111~IIW~I~n~t LEDER LETTER OF COMMENT NO. \ 0 \\J. Telephone (441) International Internationa! Accounting Standards Board.
|
|
- Robert Wood
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 <-: A 'I' L IN s~\..a,. JL., I.l^J,-,,--, T CATLIN GROUP LIMITED ^ _^ CATLIN GROUP LIMITED 111~IIW~I~n~t * * LEDER LETTER OF COMMENT NO. \ 0 \\J Cumberland House, 6 th 1h Floor, 1 Victoria Street, Hamilton, Bermuda HM11 P.O. Box HM 1287 p o Box j^ 12g7 Hamilton HMFX 14 November 2007 Bermuda Telephone (441) International Internationa! Accounting Standards Board Fax (441) Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Dear Sirs IASB Discussion Paper, Preliminary Views on Insurance Contracts Catlin Group Croup Limited ('Catlin') CCatlin'} is pleased to comment on the IASB Discussion Paper on insurance contracts. Catlin is one of the largest underwriters at Lloyd's of London, and has operations in Bermuda, the UK and the US, as well as a network of international offices. Catlin underwrites a diversified portfolio of direct and reinsurance property and casualty business, and uses outwards third-party reinsurance both to protect its capital base and to increase underwriting capacity. Catlin is domiciled in Bermuda and listed on the London Stock Exchange. The consolidated group financial statements are prepared in accordance with US GAAP. The enclosed appendix details our responses to selected questions raised in the Discussion Paper. Our principal observations are set out below. Overall objectives The introduction to the Discussion Paper notes that the final standard should address the need for users of an insurer's financial statements to receive relevant and reliable information, capable of preparation at a reasonable cost, as a basis for economic decisions; and that this information should enable users to compare the financial position and financial performance of insurers within a country and in different countries. We wholeheartedly agree that these objectives, of relevance, reliability, comparability and cost-effectiveness, should be central to the final standard. In principle, we are in agreement with the framework and the building-block approach set out in the Discussion Paper, but we are concerned over the potential inconsistencies that will arise during implementation. We believe that, without more specific guidance, guidance, divergence in practice will lead to increased confusion and uncertainty for shareholders and other users of the financial statements. We feel that the proposed approach risks compromising the objectives of comparability and costeffectiveness, whilst any improvements to relevance or reliability are as yet unproven. cost-
2 CA'TLIN A. "I 1 JL 1 NT Single model mode! We are not opposed to a single reporting model for all insurance contracts, but we believe that achieving the appropriate accounting treatment for different types of insurance is of greater importance. For many types of insurance business, most notably non-life insurance, current practices are widely accepted and understood by users of financial statements. We believe that incremental changes to these existing practices could be more beneficial than a fundamental change to the basis for measuring non-life insurance liabilities. Specifically, we believe that there may be benefit to an approach that aims for convergence of international practices by non-life insurers and is supported by disclosures explaining the associated uncertainties, as this would improve users' understanding of the risks to which insurance business is exposed. Although existing practices are not necessarily market-consistent, the fact that they involve less judgement can potentially result in more comparable, reliable and useful financial statements. At the present time it is not evident that there will be convergence between IASB tasb proposals, US GAAP and the Solvency II regulatory framework in Europe. One necessary condition for convergence will be the joint joint development of proposals between IASB and FASB. A second condition for convergence will be that the practical implementation of IFRS Phase II does not follow a very different trajectory to Solvency II. Without convergence in reporting bases, we are concerned that the outcome from the different bodies will be increased confusion for users as well as significant cost implications for the preparing cornpanies. companies. Need for appropriate field testing Whilst we acknowledge many of the theoretical rnerits merits of the approach described in the Discussion Paper, we believe that the full irnplications implications will only become apparent when the guidance is implemented in practice. Further evidence is therefore needed to demonstrate that the costs of implementing this new approach do not exceed the benefits. This is particularly relevant for non-life business; business: as indicated above, above/ we believe that a robust model based on current practices for non-life insurance could prove more useful to users of insurance entity financial statements than a fundamental change in approach. We would encourage either a process of rigorous field-testing prior to issuing a final standard, standard/ or alternatively a 'phased in' approach whereby entities report the effects of the new basis as supplementary disclosures for a number of reporting periods prior to full implementation. It is already possible to learn lessons from the field-testing which has been carried out under Solvency II. There are messages already emerging for general insurers from Solvency II with obvious parallels to IFRS Phase" II proposals. We would encourage the board to give consideration to the difficulties and ambiguities that have been encountered, even under Solvency II where there is much greater stipulation of methods and assumptions (relative to the high-level principles approach of the IASB Discussion Paper). Adequate and specific guidance We believe that the lack of specific guidance in the Discussion Paper on cash flows and risk margins allows a degree of subjectivity that could potentially create significant divergence in practice. This is clearly a potential area of difference with Solvency II that users of the accounts will find difficult to comprehend, particularly if there is not a consistent approach with regard to risk margins. 2
3 c; C--, A. / T ' \ -1-' r 'I N,",, Market versus settlement model The 'current exit value' is based on a theoretical transfer of liabilities to a third party at market rates; in practice, such transactions are rare due to the lack of a real market, and may also be subject to regulatory restrictions. Insurance liabilities are typically extinguished through settlement of claims and we therefore believe that a settlement-based model would be more consistent with economic realities. We would suggest the use of estimates of future cash flows and risk margins that are entity-specific, rather than market-based. One of the difficulties with a market-consistent model is that, without an existing market, a wide range of legitimate interpretations can be applied, leading to a potential lack of comparability between insurers. Reinsurance As noted in the Discussion Paper, a reinsurance contract may not cover the same period as the underlying contract. Typically, outwards reinsurance is purchased at key renewal dates in the year with some underlying exposure sold evenly during the year. Recognition of both gross liabilities and reinsurance assets when the insurer becomes party to the contract potentially gives a mismatch between gross and net profit, which would, in our view, lead to inappropriate presentation. We believe that financial statements that match the exposure on gross business and outwards reinsurance are important in understanding the strategy and performance of a non-life company. Adequate disclosures We believe that the uncertainties inherent in determining risk-adjusted discounted cash flows can only be understood with sufficient supplemental disclosure. IFRS 4 sets out disclosure principles, but additional specific guidance guidance will be necessary in the context of the revised reporting basis under Phase" II for insurance contracts. Diversification We strongly believe that risk margins used to measure insurance liabilities should reflect diversification between portfolios, and between reporting companies within a Croup Group structure, as this is fundamental to how an insurance entity manages risk, risk. We would be happy to discuss any of our comments with you. Yours faithful Christopher Stooke Chief Financial Officer, Catlin Group limited Limited cc. Financial Accounting Standards Board 3
4 QUESTIONS FOR RESPONDENTS IN PHASE II DISCUSSION PAPER Chapter 2 RECOGNITION AND DERECOGNITION Question 1 Should the recognition and derecognition requirements for insurance contracts be consistent with those in las IAS 39 for financial instruments? Why or why not? As described in the Discussion Paper, the effect of applying las!as 39 recognition criteria to insurance is that recognition occurs when an insurer becomes party to a contract. While in principle we are not opposed to this approach, we see two primary issues arising in cases where there is a gain or loss at inception. Firstly, as described further below, an insurance entity can become party to reinsurance outwards contracts at materially different dates from the underlying insurance covered, leading to misleading net results. Secondly, under the las IAS 39 criteria, profit for a period is sensitive to short-term timing differences. An entity's profit for a period could potentially be materially different depending on whether insurance is written - or reinsurance purchased - before or after the period end. This could be a particular issue for reinsurance business, as significant volumes are written around the first of January and first of July each year. Such timing issues could lead to misleading distortions in an entity's results, and are also prone to manipulation. Chapter 3 MEASUREMENT- - CORE ISSUES Question 2 Should an insurer measure ai/ all its insurance liabilities using the fol/owing following three building blocks (a) explicit, unbiased, market-consistent, probability-weighted and current estimates of the contractual cash flows, (b) current market discount rates that adjust the estimated future cash flows for the time value of money, and (c) an explicit and unbiased estimate of the margin that market participants require for bearing risk (a risk margin) and for providing other services, if any (a service margin)?? If not, what approach do you propose, and why? We agree that the three building blocks represent a conceptually appropriate basis for measuring insurance liabilities. However, we are not convinced that sufficient evidence yet exists that in practice they will lead to significantly more relevant or reliable information for users of financial statements. This is particularly the case for non-life insurance, where existing practices are widely accepted and understood. ; As indicated in our response to question 5, we believe that cash flows and margins are more relevant (and reliable) when based on entity-specific settlement expectations than when based on a notional market. We also believe that if the building-block approach is used, there should be appropriate presentation and disclosure guidelines. For example, estimates of cash flows relating to unexpired periods of risk are more subjective than those relating to expired risks, and should therefore be disclosed separately.
5 I-\.rrCI"IIUIA Question 3 Is the draft guidance on cash flows (appendix E) and risk margins (appendix F) at the right level of detail? Should any of that guidance be modified, deleted or extended? Why or why not? Subject to our previous comments on the use of market-based measures, we believe the guidance on cash flows and risk margins provides a clear and concise explanation of the general principles to be applied. However, we believe that without more specific guidance, particularly as regards risk margins, insurers are likely to develop practices that are not necessarily consistent with, or comparable to, each other. In particular, unless there is a recommended standard approach to methodology and underlying capital of the proposed transfer "market" it will be e)(tremely extremely difficult if not impossible to compare two companies that have adopted different practices. For example how would one judge a 75'h th percentile approach compared to a factor based capital approach especially where one company considers a theoretical market to have more diversification (thus lowering cost of capital) compared to a company that considers a theoretical run off market being less diverse than itself (thus raising the cost of capital)? Without consistency comparisons across companies may become meaningless and perhaps more damaging to the more prudent company when the users of the accounts are unfamiliar with highly complex methods which have not been road tested alongside the existing reporting framework. We would prefer a company specific cost of capital approach that is therefore relevant and explainable by the company. Question 4 What role should the actual premium charged by the insurer play in the calibration of margins, and why? Please say which of the following alternatives you support. (a) The insurer should calibrate the margin directly to the actual premium (less relevant acquisition costs), subject to a liability adequacy test. As a result, an insurer should never recognise a profit at the inception of an insurance contract. (b) There should be a rebuttable presumption that the margin implied by the actual premium (less relevant acquisition costs) is consistent with the mwgin ma/gin that market participants require. If you prefer this approach, what evidence should be needed to rebut the presumption? (c) The premium (less relevant acquisition costs) may provide evidence of the margin that market participants would require, but has no higher status than other possible evidence. In most cases, insurance contracts are expected to provide a margin consistent with the requirements of market participants. Therefore, if a significant profit or loss appears to arise at inception, further investigation is needed. Nevertheless, if the insurer concludes, after further investigation, that the estimated market price for risk and service differs from the price implied by the premiums that it charges, the insurer would recognise a profit or loss at inception. (d) Other (please specify). We believe that alternative (c) is most consistent with the building-block building-block approach. In principle, we do not oppose the recognition of profit or loss at inception. However, as described in our responses to questions 1 and 12, there are potential consequent implications in relation to the timing of recognition and to outwards reinsurance that may need to be addressed. Question 5 This paper proposes that the measurement attribute for insurance liabilities should be the amount the insurer would expect to pay at the reporting date to transfer its remaining contractual rights and obligations immediately to another entity. The paper labels that measurement attribute 'current exit value'. 2
6 (a) (aj Is that measurement attribute appropriate for insurance liabilities? Why or why not? If not, which measurement attribute do you favour, and why? (b) Is 'current exit value' the best label for that measurement attribute? Why or why not? In the overwhelming majority of instances an insurance entity extinguishes its insurance liabilities liabililies through settlement of claims rather than through an arm's-length transfer to a third party. In many cases, no deep or liquid market exists, and it is not uncommon for regulatory requirements to prohibit the transfer of insurance liabilities altogether. We do not therefore believe that the 'current exit value' 1 as described corresponds to economic realities of insurance business. We would suggest that the measurement of insurance liabilities based on an entity's expectations of the amount and timing of settlements is a more relevant attribute. A suitable label for this attribute might be 'current settlement value'. Chapter 4 POLICYHOLDER BEHAVIOUR, CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS AND ACQUISITION COSTS Question 6 We have no comments on question 6. Question 7 We have no comments on question 7. Question 8 Should an insurer recognise acquisition costs as an expense when incurred? Why or why not? We believe that recognition of acquisition costs should be consistent with the final reporting basis. Therefore if the current proposal is confirmed then this would be consistent with the building-block approach. Question 9 Do you have any comments on the treatment of insurance contracts acquired in a business combination or portfolio transfer? We believe that the building-block approach described in the Discussion Paper is broadly consistent with the measurement requirements of I IFRS 3 Business Combinations. Chapter 5 MEASUREMENT- - OTHER ISSUES Question 10 Do you have any comments on the measurement of assets held to back insurance liabilities? For non-life business, we do not believe that any specific measurement guidance is required for assets backing insurance liabilities. 3
7 Question 11 Should risk margins (a) be determined for a portfolio of insurance contracts? Why or why not? If yes, should the portfolio be defined as in IFRS 4 (a portfolio of contracts that are subject to broadly similar risks and managed together as a single portfolio)?? Why or why not? (b) reflect the benefits of diversification between (and negative correlation between) portfolios? Why or why not? Our view is that diversification is fundamental to the way in which insurance business is managed. Diversification is often managed at a Group and entity level, and this should be reflected in financial statements accordingly with both Group and entity diversification effects measured. We therefore strongly believe that risk margins should reflect the effects of diversification and negative correlation between portfolios. Question 12 (a) Should a cedant measure reinsurance assets at current exit value? Why or why not? (b) Do you agree that the consequences of measuring reinsurance assets at current exit value include the following? Why or why not? (i) A risk margin typically increases the measurement of the reinsurance asset, and equals the risk margin for the corresponding part of the underlying insurance contract. (ii) (ti) An expected loss model would be used for defaults and disputes, not the incurred loss model required by IFRS 4 and las IAS 39. (iii) (Hi) If the cedant has a contractual right to obtain reinsurance for contracts that it has not yet issued, the current exit value of the cedant's reinsurance asset includes the current exit value of that right. However, the current exit value of that contractual right is not likely to be material if it relates to insurance contracts that will be priced at current exit value. We believe that the measurement of reinsurance assets should be on a consistent basis with the underlying gross insurance exposure. If the building-block approach is applied to inwards insurance liabilities, associated reinsurance assets should be measured on a similar basis but allowing for the matching of gross and inwards reinsurance exposure (i.e. allowing for the expected future purchase of reinsurance to match gross exposure already sold or future selling of gross business to match reinsurance contracts already purchased). We believe this would be consistent with the current lea ICA approach in the UK. Unless this matching is allowed for, potential issues may arise from the timing of recognition of insurance liabilities and related reinsurance. The combination of the las IAS 39 recognition criteria and the potential for day one profits arising from the building-block approach could result in disparity between the recognition of outwards reinsurance and the covered inwards business. For example, it is quite common for outwards reinsurance to be purchased at key renewal dates in the year with the underlying exposure sold evenly during the year. In these circumstances, the proposals in the Discussion Paper could result in losses or gains on the purchase of reinsurance that do not match the corresponding gains or losses on the inwards insurance, resulting in distorted net results. We would also add the observation that the guidance on reinsurance forms a relatively small part of the Discussion Paper. For many insurers, outwa~ds outwards reinsurance is a fundamental part of the way in which business is managed, and it would therefore be helpful if this guidance were expanded. Question 13 We have no comments on question 13. 4
8 Question 14 (a) Is the current exit value of a liability the price for a transfer that neither improves nor impairs its credit characteristics? Why or why not? (b) Should the measurement of an insurance liability reflect (i) its credit characteristics at inception and (ii) (it) subsequent changes in their effect? Why or why not? We do not believe that the measurement of the insurance liability should reflect credit characteristics. Whilst there may be theoretical arguments for adjusting for credit characteristics, we do not believe that users of the financial statements would expect such adjustments or find them useful. Question 15 We have no comments on question 15. Chapter 6 POLICYHOLDER PARTICIPATION TlON Question 16 We have no comments on question 16. Question 17 We have no comments on question 17. Chapter 7 CHANGES IN INSURANCE LIABILITIES Question 18 Should an insurer present premiums as revenue or as deposits? deposits? Why? For non-life insurance, we see no reason why an insurer should not present premiums as revenue. Question 19 Which items of income and expense should an insurer present separately on the face of its income statement? Why? We believe that the current guidance in las IAS 1 and IFRS 4 is adequate in respect of income statement presentation. Any amendments to this guidance should be considered in conjunction with the lass's lasb's Financial Statement Presentation project. Question 20 Should the income statement include all income and expense arising from changes in insurance liabilities? Why or why not? We believe that under current IFRS, it would be appropriate to include all income and expense arising from changes in non-life insurance liabilities in the income statement. As indicated above, the income statement presentation of insurance contracts may be affected by the lass's lasb's Financial Statement Presentation project. 5
9 Ar-r-t:... UIA Other matters Question 21 Do you have other comments on this paper? We note that the Discussion Paper does not include extensive discussion of disclosures around insurance contracts. Appropriate disclosures will be essential to understanding insurance liabilities measured using the building-block approach. The disclosure principles in IFRS 4 provide a suitable basis for such disclosures, but further application or implementation guidance would be helpful, particularly around the uncertainty inherent in insurance liability measurement. 6
Reference: IASB Discussion Paper Preliminary Views on Insurance Contracts
CEIOPS Westhafen Tower, 14 floor, Westhafenplatz 1 60327 Frankfurt Germany Sir David Tweedie Chairman IASB 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Contact: Carlos Montalvo Rebualta Phone: +49(0)6995111922
More informationPractical guide to IFRS 23 August 2010
Practical guide to IFRS 23 August 2010 Insurance contracts Fundamental accounting changes proposed At a glance The IASB ( the board ) released an exposure draft on 30 July 2010 proposing a comprehensive
More informationRe: Comments on ED/2012/4 Classification and Measurement: Limited Amendments to IFRS 9
China Accounting Standards Committee April 11, 2012 Mr. Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London, EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Dear Mr. Hans Hoogervorst, Re:
More informationAgenda papers for this meeting 1. We have prepared the following agenda papers for this meeting:
IASB Meeting Agenda reference 5 Staff Paper Date April, Project Topic Insurance contracts Cover Note Agenda papers for this meeting 1. We have prepared the following agenda papers for this meeting: Agenda
More informationThere is a lack of clarity around the interaction between revenue recognition and insurance contracts phase II proposals
Sir David Tweedie International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London, EC4M 6XH 16 June 2009 Dear Sir David, We welcome the opportunity to comment on your Discussion Paper Preliminary Views
More informationBusiness Combinations II
April 2006 IASB Update is published as a convenience to the Board's constituents. All conclusions reported are tentative and may be changed or modified at future Board meetings. Decisions become final
More informationSAICA SUBMISSION ON THE EXPOSURE DRAFT ON FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS: EXPECTED CREDIT LOSSES
5 July 2013 International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Email: CommentLetters@ifrs.org Dear Sir/Madam SAICA SUBMISSION ON THE EXPOSURE DRAFT ON FINANCIAL In
More informationEBF Comment Letter on the IASB Exposure Draft - Financial Instruments: Expected Credit Losses
Chief Executive DM/MT Ref.:EBF_001692 Mr Hans HOOGERVORST Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London, EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Email: hhoogervorst@ifrs.org Brussels, 5 July
More informationInsurance Europe comments on the Exposure Draft: Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting.
To: From: Mr Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH Economics & Finance department Date: 18 November 2015 Reference: ECO-FRG-15-278 Subject:
More informationOrganismo Italiano di Contabilità OIC (The Italian Standard Setter) Italy, Roma, Via Poli 29 Tel. 0039/06/ fax 0039/06/
Organismo Italiano di Contabilità OIC (The Italian Standard Setter) Italy, 00187 Roma, Via Poli 29 Tel. 0039/06/6976681 fax 0039/06/69766830 Mr. Alan Teixeira Senior Project Manager IASB 30 Cannon Street
More informationHans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH. 25 October Dear Mr Hoogervorst,
Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH 25 October 2013 Dear Mr Hoogervorst, Exposure Draft: Insurance Contracts We would like to thank the IASB
More informationCOMMITTEE OF EUROPEAN SECURITIES REGULATORS
COMMITTEE OF EUROPEAN SECURITIES REGULATORS IASB 30 Cannon Street LONDON EC4M 6XH United Kingdom commentletters@iasb.org Date: 25 September 2009 Ref.: CESR/09-895 RE: CESR s response to the IASB s Exposure
More informationMr Hans Hoogervorst Chairman IFRS Foundation 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom (By online submission)
A S C ACCOUNTING STANDARDS COUNCIL SINGAPORE 30 October 2015 Mr Hans Hoogervorst Chairman IFRS Foundation 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom (By online submission) Dear Hans RESPONSE TO EXPOSURE
More informationIASB Update. Welcome to IASB Update. Balance sheet - offsetting. Insurance contracts. June Contact us
IASB Update From the International Accounting Standards Board June 2010 Welcome to IASB Update This IASB Update is a staff summary of the tentative decisions reached by the Board at a public meeting. As
More informationResponse to the IASB Exposure Draft Financial Instruments: Expected Credit Losses
Response to the IASB Exposure Draft Financial Instruments: Expected Credit Losses 14 June 2013 CA House 21 Haymarket Yards Edinburgh EH12 5BH enquiries@icas.org.uk +44 (0)131 347 0100 icas.org.uk Direct:
More informationDRAFT. Re: Exposure Draft ED 1: First-time Application of International Financial Reporting Standards
October xx, 2002 Sir David Tweedie Chairman IASB 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH UK Dear David, DRAFT Re: Exposure Draft ED 1: First-time Application of International Financial Reporting Standards On
More informationRe: Exposure Draft, Financial Instruments: Expected Credit Losses IASB Reference ED/2013/3
277 Wellington Street West, Toronto, ON Canada M5V 3H2 Tel: (416) 977-3322 Fax: (416) 204-3412 www.frascanada.ca 277 rue Wellington Ouest, Toronto (ON) Canada M5V 3H2 Tél: (416) 977-3322 Téléc : (416)
More informationJanuary 13, The Honorable Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London, EC4M 6XH United Kingdom
The Honorable Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London, EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Re: IASB Discussion Paper: A Review of the Conceptual Framework for Financial
More informationImplications of Exposure Draft IFRS 4 Phase II and its Implementation
www.pwc.co.uk Implications of Exposure Draft IFRS 4 Phase II and its Implementation Institute of Actuaries of India Conference 17 October 2011 Gautam Kakar Agenda Definition and scope of contracts Measurement
More informationExposure Draft: Financial Instruments: Expected Credit Losses
International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Stockholm 5 July 2013 Exposure Draft: Financial Instruments: Expected Credit Losses FAR, the Institute for the Accountancy
More informationIASB Discussion Paper of Accounting for Dynamic Risk Management: a Portfolio Revaluation Approach to Macro Hedging
Our Ref.: C/FRSC Sent electronically through the IASB Website (www.ifrs.org) 11 November 2014 International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Dear Sirs, IASB Discussion
More informationIFRS4 An Update. PwC. *connected thinking. Presented by Shu-Yen Liu 7 th November 2007
IFRS4 An Update Presented by Shu-Yen Liu 7 th *connected thinking PwC IFRS 4 Phase I Objectives 1 2 3 Interim standard - focuses primarily on disclosures and classification of insurance contracts. Introduces
More informationRe: OIC response to the IASB Exposure Draft Financial Instruments: Impairment
Organismo Italiano di Contabilità OIC (The Italian Standard Setter) Italy, 00187 Roma, Via Poli 29 Tel. 0039/06/6976681 fax 0039/06/69766830 e-mail: presidenza@fondazioneoic.it Mr Hans HOOGERVORST Chairman
More information28 July Re.: FEE Comments on IASB Discussion Paper Preliminary Views on Revenue Recognition in Contracts with Customers
28 July 2009 Sir David Tweedie Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street GB - LONDON EC4M 6XH E-mail: commentletters@iasb.org Ref.: ACC/HvD/SS/LF/ID Dear Sir David, Re.: FEE Comments
More informationComment Letter No Consultation response IFRS Exposure Draft ED/2010/9 : Leases
Consultation response IFRS Exposure Draft ED/2010/9 : Leases December 2010 About the Actuarial Profession The Institute and Faculty of Actuaries is the chartered professional body for actuaries in the
More informationI am writing on behalf of the Conseil National de la Comptabilité (CNC) to express our views on the above-mentioned Discussion Paper.
CONSEIL NATIONAL DE LA COMPTABILITE 3, BOULEVARD DIDEROT 75572 PARIS CEDEX 12 Phone 01 53 44 52 01 Fax 01 53 18 99 43 / 01 53 44 52 33 Internet E-mail LE PRÉSIDENT JFL/MPC http://www.cnc.minefi.gouv.fr
More informationInternational Accounting Issues
International Accounting Issues Rob Esson, NAIC & Chair of the IAIS Insurance Contracts Subcommittee Overview of presentation Outline of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) process and
More informationIASB Supplement to Exposure Draft of Financial Instruments: Impairment (File Reference No )
Our Ref.: C/FRSC Sent electronically through email (director@fasb.org) 1 April 2011 International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Financial Accounting Standards
More informationTel: +44 [0] Fax: +44 [0] ey.com. Tel: Fax:
Ernst & Young Global Limited Becket House 1 Lambeth Palace Road London SE1 7EU Tel: +44 [0]20 7980 0000 Fax: +44 [0]20 7980 0275 ey.com Tel: 023 8038 2000 Fax: 023 8038 2001 International Accounting Standards
More informationReference: IASB Exposure Draft Fair Value Option for Financial Liabilities
CEIOPS Westhafen Tower, 14 floor, Westhafenplatz 1 60327 Frankfurt Germany Sir David Tweedie Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Contact: Carlos
More informationDear Mr. Golden, Key Messages:
Deutsche Bank AG London Winchester House 1 Great Winchester Street London EC2N 2DB Tel. +44 20 7545 8000 Mr. Russell Golden, Technical Director 7 September 2010 File Reference No. 1830-100, Financial Accounting
More informationHans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standard Board (IASB) 30 Cannon Street London, EC4M 6XH
THE CHAIRPERSON Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standard Board (IASB) 30 Cannon Street London, EC4M 6XH EBA/2015/D/376 25 November 2015 Exposure Draft: Conceptual Framework for Financial
More informationED/2013/7 Exposure Draft: Insurance Contracts
Ian Laughlin Deputy Chairman 31 October 2013 Mr. Hans Hoogervorst Chairman IFRS Foundation 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Dear Mr. Hoogervorst, ED/2013/7 Exposure Draft: Insurance Contracts
More informationED 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures
Hill House 1 Little New Street London EC4A 3TR United Kingdom Tel: National +44 20 7936 3000 Direct Telephone: +44 20 7007 0907 Direct Fax: +44 20 7007 0158 www.deloitte.com www.iasplus.com 21 October
More informationComments on Discussion Paper Preliminary Views on Revenue Recognition in Contracts with Customers
19 June 2009 International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Dear Sir or Madame Comments on Discussion Paper Preliminary Views on Revenue Recognition in Contracts
More informationHans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH. To: Date: 14 January 2014
To: Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH Date: 14 January 2014 DP/2013/1: A Review of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting Dear
More information27 July International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street, London EC4M BXH. United Kingdom. Dear Madam, dear Sir,
27 July 2009 International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street, London EC4M BXH United Kingdom Tower 42 25 Old Broad Street London EC2N 1HQ United Kingdom t + 44 (0) 20 7382 1770 f + 44 (0) 20
More informationIFRS 4 Insurance Contracts
March 2004 IFRS 4 INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARD IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts International Accounting Standards Board International Financial Reporting Standard 4 Insurance Contracts INTERNATIONAL
More informationED/2012/4 Classification and Measurement: Limited Amendments to IFRS 9
Tony Burke Director, Industry Policy & Strategy AUSTRALIAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION INC. Level 3, 56 Pitt Street, Sydney NSW 2000 p. +61 (0)2 8298 0409 f. +61 (0)2 8298 0402 www.bankers.asn.au 19 March 2013
More informationIAS 12 Income Taxes Recognising DTA s for unrealised losses on AFS debt securities
Mr Robert Garnett Chairman IFRS Interpretations Committee 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom The European Insurance CFO Forum C/O Dieter Wemmer Zurich Financial Services Ltd Mythenquai 2 CH-8002
More informationRevenue from Contracts with Customers
International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom commentletters@iasb.org cc: info@efrag.org cc: main@businesseurope.eu Stockholm, 18 October 2010 Exposure Draft
More informationNEW EXPOSURE DRAFT IFRS 4 - PHASE , Novembre 7
NEW EXPOSURE DRAFT IFRS 4 - PHASE 2 2013, Novembre 7 OVERVIEW 1. Background to the project 2. Key points of the new ED and their impact 3. Conclusion 2 01 BACKGROUND TO THE PROJECT 3 BACKGROUND The insurance
More informationRe.: IASB Exposure Draft 2013/3 Financial Instruments: Expected Credit Losses
Mr Hans Hoogervorst Chairman of the International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom 19 June 2013 540 Dear Mr Hoogervorst Re.: IASB Exposure Draft 2013/3 Financial
More informationI am writing on behalf of the Autorité des Normes Comptables (ANC) to express our views on the Exposure draft on proposed amendments to IAS 19.
AUTORITE DES NORMES COMPTABLES 3, Boulevard Diderot 75572 PARIS CEDEX 12 Phone 33 1 53 44 52 01 Fax 33 1 53 18 99 43/33 1 53 44 52 33 Internet http://www.anc.gouv.fr Mel jerome.haas@anc.gouv.fr Paris,
More informationBusiness combinations (phase I) July 2002
July 2002 The International Accounting Standards Board met in London 16-19 July 2002, when it discussed: Business combinations Consolidation and special purpose entities Convergence of accounting standards
More informationIASB /FASB Meeting 10 February A. Reinsurance. Purpose of this paper
IASB /FASB Meeting 10 February 2010 IASB agenda reference FASB memo reference 1A 38A Project Topic Insurance Contracts Reinsurance Purpose of this paper 1. An insurance contract involves purchase by a
More informationRe: Financial Instruments: Impairment, Supplement to ED/2009/12
April 1, 2011 International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street, 1st Floor London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Dear Sirs: Re: Financial Instruments: Impairment, Supplement to ED/2009/12 This letter
More informationRio de Janeiro, January 14, 2014 CONTABILIDADE 0006/2014
CONTABILIDADE 0006/2014 Rio de Janeiro, January 14, 2014 Mr Hoogervorst, Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Subject: Conceptual Framework
More informationPAAB SUBMISSION ON ED 2015/7- CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING
20 November 2015 IFRS Foundation 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Email: commentletters@ifrs.org Dear Sir/Madam PAAB SUBMISSION ON ED 2015/07 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING
More informationDiscussion Paper - Accounting for Dynamic Risk Management: a Portfolio Revaluation Approach to Macro Hedging
THE CHAIRPERSON Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH 16 October 2014 Discussion Paper - Accounting for Dynamic Risk Management: a Portfolio
More informationHans Hoogervorst Chairman IFRS Foundation 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH. 24 November Dear Hans
Hans Hoogervorst Chairman IFRS Foundation 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH 24 November 2015 Dear Hans RE: Exposure Draft: Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting The Investment Association represents
More informationFEE Comments on IASB Request for Information ( Expected Loss Model ) Impairment of Financial Assets: Expected Cash Flow Approach
11 September 2009 Sir David Tweedie Chairman International Accounting Standards Board Cannon Street GB LONDON EC4M 6XH S E-mail: commentletters@iasb.org Ref.: BAN/HvD/SS/LF/SR Dear Sir David, Re: FEE Comments
More informationQuestion 1 Adjusting the contractual service margin
Question 1 Adjusting the contractual service margin Do you agree that financial statements would provide relevant information that faithfully represents the entity s financial position and performance
More informationRe: Exposure Draft ED/2010/5 Presentation of Items of Other Comprehensive Income
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited 2 New Street Square London EC4A 3BZ United Kingdom Sir David Tweedie Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London United Kingdom EC4M 6XH Tel:
More informationRe: Proposed amendments to IAS 32 and 39 Financial Instruments
TEG0207-7.1 October XX, 2002 Sir David Tweedie Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Dear David Re: Proposed amendments to IAS 32 and 39 Financial
More informationIASB Discussion Paper DP/2014/1 Accounting for Dynamic Risk Management: a Portfolio Revaluation Approach to Macro Hedging
28 November 2014 Mr Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH UNITED KINGDOM Level 7, 600 Bourke Street MELBOURNE VIC 3000 Postal Address PO Box
More informationInternational Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs ) A Briefing for Chief Executives, Audit Committees & Boards of Directors
2012 International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs ) A Briefing for Chief Executives, Audit Committees & Boards of Directors 2012 International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs ) A Briefing for
More informationThe IDW appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Exposure Draft Insurance
Mr Hans Hoogervorst Chairman of the International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom 23 October 2013 567/550 Dear Mr Hoogervorst Re.: IFRS Exposure Draft 2013/7
More informationIASB/FASB Meeting April 2010
IASB/FASB Meeting April 2010 - week beginning 19 April IASB agenda reference FASB memo reference 3D 43D Project Topic Insurance contracts Discounting Purpose of this paper 1. Both boards previously decided
More informationComments on the Exposure Draft Financial Instruments: Amortised Cost and Impairment
June 30, 2010 International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Dear Sir or Madame, Comments on the Exposure Draft Financial Instruments: Amortised Cost and Impairment
More informationComment Letter on Exposure Draft ED/2017/5 Accounting Policies and Accounting Estimates (Proposed amendments to IAS 8)
Tel +44 (0) 20 7694 8871 15 Canada Square reinhard.dotzlaw@kpmgifrg.com London E14 5GL United Kingdom Mr Hans Hoogervorst International Accounting Standards Board 1st Floor 30 Cannon Street London EC4M
More informationStudy of Alternative Measurement Attributes with Respect to Liabilities
Study of Alternative Measurement Attributes with Respect to Liabilities Subproject of the IAA Insurance Accounting Committee in response to a request of the IASB to help identifying an adequate measurement
More informationA F E P. Association Française des Entreprises Privées
A F E P Association Française des Entreprises Privées IASB 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH UK Paris, 7 May 2010 Re: ED Measurement of liabilities in IAS 37 We welcome the opportunity to comment on the
More informationRe: Exposure Draft Financial Instruments: Amortised Cost and Impairment
28 June 2010 International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Dear Sir / Madam Re: Exposure Draft Financial Instruments: Amortised Cost and Impairment On behalf
More informationMarch Basis for Conclusions Exposure Draft ED/2009/2. Income Tax. Comments to be received by 31 July 2009
March 2009 Basis for Conclusions Exposure Draft ED/2009/2 Income Tax Comments to be received by 31 July 2009 Basis for Conclusions on Exposure Draft INCOME TAX Comments to be received by 31 July 2009 ED/2009/2
More informationExposure Draft of Proposed amendments to IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement Exposures Qualifying for Hedge Accounting - 1 -
ISDA International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. One Bishops Square London E1 6AO United Kingdom Telephone: 44 (20) 3088 3550 Facsimile: 44 (20) 3088 3555 email: isdaeurope@isda.org website:
More informationDiscussion Paper DP/2013/1 A Review of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting
International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Stockholm 9 January, 2014 Discussion Paper DP/2013/1 A Review of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting
More informationIFRIC Draft Interpretation D23, Distributions of Non-Cash Assets to Owners
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 10-18 Union Street London SE1 1SZ Telephone +44 (0) 20 7583 5000 Facsimile +44 (0) 20 7822 4652 pwc.com/uk International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee 1st Floor
More informationConseil national de la comptabilité. Téléphone Télécopie / Internet
Conseil National de la Comptabilité 3, Boulevard Diderot 75572 PARIS CEDEX 12 Paris, 07 January 2008 Téléphone 01.53.44.52.01 Télécopie 01 53 18 99 43 / 01 53 44 52 33 Internet http://www.cnc.minefi.gouv.fr/
More informationCOUNCIL OF AUDITORS GENERAL. IASB Discussion Paper DP/2013/1 - A Review of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting
ACAG AUSTRALASIAN COUNCIL OF AUDITORS GENERAL 8 November 2013 Mr Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Dear Mr Hoogervorst IASB
More informationRe: ED of Proposed Amendments to IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets and IAS 19 Employee Benefits
28 November 2005 International Accounting Standards Board Henry Rees Project Manager 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH UK Email: CommentLetters@iasb.org Dear Henry, Re: ED of Proposed Amendments to IAS
More informationBusiness Combinations II
October 2006 IASB Update is published as a convenience for the Board's constituents. All conclusions reported are tentative and may be changed or modified at future Board meetings. Decisions become final
More informationIASB Exposure Draft Insurance Contracts
IASB Exposure Draft Insurance Contracts 23 September 2010 KUALA LUMPUR IASB Exposure Draft Insurance Contracts Jeremy Hoon 23 September 2010 KPMG LLP, SINGAPORE OECD Bank Negara Malaysia OECD-Asia Regional
More informationMonsieur Hans HOOGERVORST Chairman IASB. 30 Cannon Street LONDON EC4M 6XH UNITED KINGDOM
AUTORITÉ DES NORMES COMPTABLES 5, PLACE DES VINS DE FRANCE 75573 PARIS CÉDEX 12 Phone 33 1 53 44 28 53 Internet http://www.autoritecomptable.fr/ Mel jerome.haas@anc.gouv.fr Chairman JH n 54 Paris, the
More informationPreliminary Exposure Draft of
Preliminary Exposure Draft of International Actuarial Standard of Practice A Practice Guideline* Accounting for Reinsurance Contracts under International Financial Reporting Standards IFRS [2005] A Preliminary
More informationComments on the Discussion Paper A Review of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting
17 January 2014 International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC 4M 6XH United Kingdom Dear Sir or Madam, Comments on the Discussion Paper A Review of the Conceptual Framework for Financial
More informationComments on the Exposure Draft Hedge Accounting
International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom 9 March 2011 Dear Sir or Madame, Comments on the Exposure Draft Hedge Accounting We appreciate the efforts made
More informationRe: Request for Information: Comprehensive Review of the IFRS for SMEs
International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Dear Sirs, 29 November 2012 Re: Request for Information: Comprehensive Review of the IFRS for SMEs The Institute
More informationComment Letter on Financial Instruments Exposure Draft
International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) First Floor 30 Cannon Street London, EC4M 6XH United Kingdom 15 September, 2009 Comment Letter on Financial Instruments Exposure Draft Dear Board Members,
More informationInternational Financial Reporting Standards Updates. Joint Regional Seminar on Financial Reporting, June 2006
Actuarial Services International Financial Reporting Standards Updates Joint Regional Seminar on Financial Reporting, 22-30 June 2006 Jonathan Zhao, FSA Bruce Moore, FSA 1 Agenda Background on IFRS Review
More informationOctober 25, Mr. Hans Hoogervorst International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom
K 333 S. Wabash Ave. Chicago IL 60604 October 25, 2013 D. Craig Mense Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Telephone 312-822-1222 Facsimile 312-822-2004 Internet craig.mense@cna.com Mr.
More informationRe: Comments on Exposure Draft Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting
25 November 2015 Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Re: Comments on Exposure Draft Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting
More information(draft) Preliminary Exposure Draft. International Actuarial Standard of Practice a Practice Guideline*
(draft) Preliminary Exposure Draft International Actuarial Standard of Practice a Practice Guideline* Distributed on November 24, 2004 Comments to be received by March 24, 2005 to katy.martin@actuaries.org
More informationProposed Accounting Standards Update, Financial Instruments Credit Losses (Subtopic )
Tel +44 (0)20 7694 8871 8 Salisbury Square Fax +44 (0)20 7694 8429 London EC4Y 8BB mark.vaessen@kpmgifrg.com United Kingdom Mr Hans Hoogervorst International Accounting Standards Board 1 st Floor 30 Cannon
More informationReference: Exposure Draft Measurement of Liabilities in IAS37 (limited re-exposure of proposed amendments to IAS37)
CEIOPS Westhafen Tower, 14 floor, Westhafenplatz 1 60327 Frankfurt Germany Sir David Tweedie Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Contact: Carlos
More informationSubmitted electronically through the IFRS Foundation website (
International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH Ltd Grant Thornton House 22 Melton Street London NW1 2EP 5 July 2013 Submitted electronically through the IFRS Foundation website
More informationCL October International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom
26 October 2015 CL 33 International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Comment Letter on the Exposure Draft on Clarifications to IFRS 15 Dear Sir/Madam, SwissHoldings,
More informationED 10 Consolidated Financial Statements
December 2008 Basis for Conclusions ED10 BASIS FOR CONCLUSIONS ON EXPOSURE DRAFT ED 10 Consolidated Financial Statements Comments to be received by 20 March 2009 Basis for Conclusions on Exposure Draft
More informationI would appreciate your including our comments in your summary of analysis.
28 March 2013 International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street, London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Dear Sir or Madam: The Korea Accounting Standards Board (KASB) has finalized its comments on Exposure
More informationthe lack of clarity about the nature of the Right-of-Use (RoU) asset, and possible consequences for regulatory capital treatment; and
David Schraa Regulatory Counsel September 13, 2013 Mr. Russell Golden, Chairman Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 PO Box 5116 Norwalk, Connecticut 06856-5116 Mr. Hans Hoogervorst, Chairman
More informationProject Summary and Feedback Statement Financial Liabilities
October 2010 Project Summary and Feedback Statement Financial Liabilities Time line 2009 2010 2011 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Part 1: Classification and measurement IFRS 9 Finalisation of Financial Assets ED
More informationDear Mr. Hoogervorst,
Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH Paris, October 25 th 2013 Re: IASB ED / 2013 / 7 Insurance Contracts Dear Mr. Hoogervorst, CNP Assurances
More informationExposure draft 2016/1 Definition of a Business and Accounting for Previously Held Interests (Proposed amendments to IFRS 3 and IFRS 11)
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited 2 New Street Square London EC4A 3BZ Phone: +44 (0)20 7936 3000 Fax: +44 (0)20 7583 1198 www.deloitte.com/about 31 October 2016 Direct phone: +44 207 007 0884 vepoole@deloitte.co.uk
More informationG m A J THE GENERAL INSURANCE ASSOCIATION OF JAPAN
G m A J THE GENERAL INSURANCE ASSOCIATION OF JAPAN 2013-290 oca ~e Non-Life Insurance Building, 9, Kanda Awajicho 2-Chome, Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo ~-:- -:!:: -~0 101-8335, Japan Tel:+81-3-3255-1221 October 25,
More informationIFRS Seminar for Regulators Accounting and Regulatory Issues Insurance Sector
REPARIS A REGIONAL PROGRAM IFRS Seminar for Regulators Accounting and Regulatory Issues Insurance Sector Session 2: Implications for regulators of IFRS4 Phase I versus Phase II Teddy Nyahasha May 31, 2011
More information1 September International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street, London EC4M BXH. United Kingdom. Dear Madam, dear Sir,
1 September 2009 International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street, London EC4M BXH United Kingdom Tower 42 25 Old Broad Street London EC2N 1HQ United Kingdom t + 44 (0) 20 7382 1770 f + 44 (0)
More informationGeneral insurance reserving
General insurance reserving Challenges for today and tomorrow IFRS Phase 2 by Richard Bulmer Tuesday 7 May 2013 2013 Towers Watson. All rights reserved. IFRS 4 Phase II: Project Objectives and Timeline
More informationClarifications to IFRS 15 Letter to the European Commission
Olivier Guersent Director General, Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union European Commission 1049 Brussels 6 July 2016 Dear Mr Guersent Adoption of Clarifications to IFRS 15
More informationIFRS 17 issues Level of aggregation Draft for discussion
IFRS 17 issues Level of aggregation Draft for discussion 1 Current IASB requirements and TRG conclusions... 1 1.1 IFRS 17 requirements... 1 1.2 TRG... 5 TRG Staff analysis (2018-09 AP10)... 5 TRG Conclusion
More informationBELGIAN ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD
BELGIAN ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 * 163 0-100 * LEDER OF COMMENT NO. Z2.J International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street london EC4M 6XH United
More information