Our reference/name Tel.-Extension/ Date Page of 10
|
|
- Susan Butler
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 TÜV SÜD AG Munich Germany IFRS Foundation Publications Department 30 Cannon Street, London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Our reference/name Tel.-Extension/ Date Page Andreas Gaar of 10 andreas.gaar@tuev-sued.de Dear Ladies and Gentlemen, TÜV SÜD Group appreciates the opportunity to participate in the Post-implementation Review: IFRS 3 Business Combinations. TÜV SÜD Group is a global technical services provider. Our range of services covers testing, inspection and certification, as well as consulting and training. As dedicated and responsible specialists with wide-ranging industry expertise, we develop made to-measure solutions for retail customers as well as for industry, trade and government. As consultants, we optimize technology, systems and know-how, while focusing on the entire value added chain. Headquartered in Munich, Germany, TÜV SÜD Group operates in some 50 countries around the world. At 800 locations on five continents, 20,000 employees increase safety and add economic value for our customers, thus generating revenues of 1.9bn in As a privately held company which prepares its consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS we concluded a total of 42 business combinations which fall under the scope of IFRS 3 since January 1, As a consequence, we were able to gather extensive experience in accounting for business combinations both under IFRS 3 (2008) and IFRS 3 (2004). Even though we believe that IFRS 3 conveys valuable information to users of financial statements, additional guidance on certain issues could contribute to improving the cost effectiveness of business combination accounting. Headquarters: Munich Trade Register Munich HRB VAT ID No. DE Information pursuant to Section 2(1) DL-InfoV (Germany) at Supervisory Board: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Hans-Jörg Bullinger (Chairman) Board of Management: Dr. Axel Stepken (Chairman), Dirk Eilers, Dr. Matthias J. Rapp, Horst Schneider, Karsten Xander Phone: Fax: TÜV SÜD AG Group Accounting Westendstr Munich Germany
2 Page 2 of 10 In case of questions or if you wish to discuss our remarks in more detail, please do not hesitate to contact us. Kind regards, Stefan Lembert Head of Group Accounting Andreas Gaar Group Accounting / International Accounting
3 Page 3 of 10 Appendix 1: The following are TÜV SÜD Group s answers to the questions raised in the PiR IFRS Business Combinations request for information: Question 1: Please tell us: (a) about your role in relation to business combinations (ie preparer of financial statements, auditor, valuation specialist, user of financial statements and type of user, regulator, standard-setter, academic, accounting professional body etc). (b) your principal jurisdiction. If you are a user of financial statements, which geographical regions do you follow or invest in? (c) whether your involvement with business combinations accounting has been mainly with IFRS 3 (2004) or IFRS 3 (2008). (d) if you are a preparer of financial statements: (i) whether your jurisdiction or company is a recent adopter of IFRS and, if so, the year of adoption; and (ii) with how many business combinations accounted for under IFRS has your organisation been involved since 2004 and what were the industries of the acquirees in those combinations. (e) if you are a user of financial statements, please briefly describe the main business combinations accounted for under IFRS that you have analysed since 2004 (for example, geographical regions in which those transactions took place, what were the industries of the acquirees in those business combinations etc). TÜV SÜD is a preparer of financial statements, headquartered in Germany. Our scope of investment is worldwide, with a strong focus on industrialized and emerging markets. Having adopted IFRS as of January 1, 2007, we applied both IFRS 3 (2004) and IFRS 3 (2008). Overall, since that date we concluded 42 business combinations of which the majority of transactions have been accounted for under IFRS 3 (2008). All acquirees were from the technical services industry. Question 2: (a) Are there benefits of having separate accounting treatments for business combinations and asset acquisitions? If so, what are these benefits? (b) What are the main practical implementation, auditing or enforcement challenges you face when assessing a transaction to determine whether it is a business? For the practical implementation challenges that you have indicated, what are the main considerations that you take into account in your assessment?
4 Page 4 of 10 M&A transactions concluded by TÜV SÜD in recent years all satisfied the requirements of a business combination. Given that under IFRS 3.B7 an organized workforce capable of following rules is considered sufficient to satisfy the need for processes, we believe that in the people driven services industry, asset acquisitions will be few and far between. Moreover, such transactions will likely not be material. This, however, might be different in other industries. Question 3: (a) To what extent is the information derived from the fair value measurements relevant and the information disclosed about fair value measurements sufficient? (a) If there are deficiencies, what are they? (b) What have been the most significant valuation challenges in measuring fair value within the context of business combination accounting? What have been the most significant challenges when auditing or enforcing those fair value measurements? (c) Has fair value measurement been more challenging for particular elements: for example, specific assets, liabilities, consideration etc? (a) According to the Conceptual Framework information is relevant if it has predictive value, confirmatory value or both. We believe that the measuring assets and liabilities of the acquiree at fair value does convey valuable information to a user of financial statements. Based on the disclosed fair values, the reader of the financial statements has the opportunity to confirm as to whether the entity accounting for a business combination does share his views on the value drivers of the acquiree. We believe that this information has both confirmatory value and predictive value. However, limitations to the relevance of information apply to the valuation of specific intangible assets, if certain valuation methods are applied or if historic data is not available. Generally, the most significant challenges in valuing assets and liabilities within the scope of a business combination are: Measuring intangible assets at fair value to which cash flows cannot be attributed, either directly or indirectly, frequently causes the relevance of valuation results to be rather low. For measuring fair value of such assets, like accreditations to issue certifications or perform certain restricted services, preparers of financial statements regularly have to resort to apply reproduction or replacement cost methods. Due to the inherent limitations of these valuation methods, the appraised asset value might not reflect the ex ante value contribution of these assets considering the value driver analysis of the acquiree. The valuation of (non-contractual) customer relationships, especially determining certain parameters such as the remaining economic useful life of such relationships, can be challenging if no past statistical data, such as customer retention rates are available which can be used as a valid starting point for estimating certain valuation inputs. This often is the case for remaining useful life, if the acquiree is providing services on a per project basis or if the acquiree is a SME with limited controlling systems that did not keep track of such data in the past. One approach to adequately derive and document such parameters in absence of historical data is to use scoring models which consider a
5 Page 5 of 10 number of factors impacting the strength of the customer relationship such as the nature of the customer relationship, contract details, the market structure and competitive situation in the market. However, in absence of hard data substantial leeway remains for the entity accounting for a business combination in determining the economic useful life of customer relationships. This fact impedes the comparability of business combination accounting for transactions within the same industry. For TÜV SÜD Group, the global financial crisis did not lead to a significant increase in challenges encountered in measuring assets or liabilities identified at fair value. This is mainly due to the fact that our business model in the TIC (testing, inspection and certification) market is comparably stable and thus not susceptible to short-term economic fluctuations. Question 4 (a) Do you find the separate recognition of intangible assets useful? If so, why? How does it contribute to your understanding and analysis of the acquired business? Do you think changes are needed and, if so, what are they and why? (b) What are the main implementation, auditing or enforcement challenges in the separate recognition of intangible assets from goodwill? What do you think are the main causes of those challenges? (c) How useful do you find the recognition of negative goodwill in profit or loss and the disclosures about the underlying reasons why the transaction resulted in a gain? We believe that the separate recognition of intangible assets significantly enhances the relevance of business combinations accounting for the following reasons: By recording intangible assets separately from goodwill, the user of financial statements receives valuable information as to how the acquiring entity views and weighs the value drivers of the acquiree. Especially in the services industry which exhibits low equipment intensity and a high share of intangible assets in total value, separate recognition of intangible assets conveys a high degree of relevant information to the user of financial statements, even if there are inherent limitations to the valuation of intangible assets: i.e. as intangible asset valuations frequently require a large number of entity specific level 3 inputs, the supportable range of values often is larger than in an ordinary business valuation. We do not believe that changes to the current principles of accounting are required. Based on our experience, the challenges in implementing separate recognition criteria are correctly identifying value drivers of the acquiree and attributing these value drivers to particular intangible assets. Due to interdependencies between intangible assets and their impact on the business, this is not always straightforward: e.g. it is not clear at first sight, which impact a brand has on customer retention. Soft facts as the customers` prior experience of the quality of products and services offered by the acquiree must be considered. A deep understanding of
6 Page 6 of 10 the acquiree s business, market environment and industry practices is necessary to arrive at adequate results. With regards to negative goodwill, we do not think that recording negative goodwill directly within profit and loss provides a significant advantage as opposed to recording negative goodwill in the balance sheet and amortizing the amount over a pre-determined period. We believe however, that disclosures about the underlying reasons of a negative goodwill could be valuable to users of financial statements, if they are comprehensively made. Question 5 (a) How useful have you found the information obtained from annually assessing goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives for impairment, and why? (b) Do you think that improvements are needed regarding the information provided by the impairment test? If so, what are they? (c) What are the main implementation, auditing or enforcement challenges in testing goodwill or intangible assets with indefinite useful lives for impairment, and why? In general, we believe that the information conveyed by performing impairment tests on goodwill and intangible assets is useful to the user as well as for the preparer of financial statements: By way of the results and more importantly the disclosures of key assumptions employed by the accounting entity in its impairment tests, users of financial statements can receive additional information on management`s expectations for each CGUs future prospects. Annual impairment testing for goodwill and indefinite useful life intangible assets forces the accounting entity to put more focus on analyzing the potential outcomes of transactions, thus promoting the use of scenarios before and after conclusion of a transaction. In our view, this often is to the benefit of the acquirer. The main challenge in implementing impairment testing for goodwill and intangible assets is to utilize existing systems in a way to automate the process of impairment testing. By using standard models and standard reports, the effort required for impairment testing is manageable, even for medium-sized entities such as TÜV SÜD Group. Also, even if the impairment only approach was scrapped, a goodwill impairment test would still have to be performed in case of a triggering event. Thus, irrespective of the initial accounting treatment of goodwill, efficient impairment testing processes need to be maintained. As a consequence, in our view, savings in cost and effort would be limited while the quality of results would likely be lower due to lack of repetition. Further challenges encountered are: Allocating corporate assets to CGUs often requires substantial manual adjustments not only to the carrying amount of a CGU, but also to the business plan. If a Group charges
7 Page 7 of 10 the costs associated with corporate assets to its subsidiaries, these charges have to be reversed and replaced by operating costs and depreciation associated with corporate assets. In addition, reinvestments in corporate assets need to be considered. We thus encourage the IASB to provide clarifying guidance that an allocation of corporate assets is not required if costs associated with these assets are charged to CGUs at market rates (including an adequate profit margin). Determining the correct level of impairment testing for intangibles assets (with or without indefinite useful life) has been a matter of discussion in past and present. Whereas there are parties, that believe that a separate asset which was initially measured by using the income approach should also be tested for impairment on the level of a separate asset using the same valuation method, other parties have advocated the view that an impairment test should always be performed at the level of (a more aggregated) CGU. Further guidance on part of the IASB on this issue would be appreciated. Question 6 (a) How useful is the information resulting from the presentation and measurement requirements for NCIs? Does the information resulting from those requirements reflect the claims on consolidated equity that are not attributable to the parent? If not, what improvements do you think are needed? (b) What are the main challenges in the accounting for NCIs, or auditing or enforcing such accounting? Please specify the measurement option under which those challenges arise. To help us assess your answer better, we would be grateful if you could please specify the measurement option under which you account for NCIs that are present ownership interests and whether this measurement choice is made on an acquisition-by-acquisition basis. To date we have measured NCI for all acquisitions accounted for under IFRS 3 (2008) at the proportionate share of identifiable net assets (Proportionate share method). If a preparer of financial statements chooses to apply the proportionate share of net assets method, the amount of goodwill recognized depends on the percentage of shares acquired. Irrespective of further share purchases or disposals, the goodwill will not change. Thus, the goodwill recognized will not reflect the overall consideration paid. On the other hand, measuring the NCI at fair value permits the accounting entity with a wider margin for discretion in determining fair value. We do not believe that either option is clearly superior and in absence of a better approach, we agree with the notion that preparers should be able to choose which method to apply. Irrespective of the merits of the methods to measure NCI as of acquisition date, we believe that the option to choose on acquisition-by-acquisition basis between measuring NCI either with the proportionate share method or the fair value method might limit the information value of the financial statement of the accounting entity. We therefore suggest to compel preparers to choose one of the two methods and apply it consistently in all business combinations.
8 Page 8 of 10 Question 7 (a) How useful do you find the information resulting from the step acquisition guidance in IFRS 3? If any of the information is unhelpful, please explain why. (b) How useful do you find the information resulting from the accounting for a parent s retained investment upon the loss of control in a former subsidiary? If any of the information is unhelpful, please explain why. The main advantage of the accounting treatment of step acquisitions under IFRS (2008) is that it is comparably easy to apply and understand (especially compared to the guidance in IFRS (2004)). Generally, it is useful that the business combination accounting is based on the consideration transferred plus the fair value of the shares owned by the accounting entity prior to taking control over the acquiree (pre-existing investment). Recording a gain or loss from the revaluation of the pre-existing investment is consistent with the treatment of the remaining investment in the former subsidiary after a loss of control. The quality of information conveyed by this is somewhat limited if the basis is not disclosed on which the fair value of the pre-existing investment was determined. The same is true for the revaluation of shares retained after the loss of control. In order to better assess the revaluation gain or loss, it would be helpful to require additional disclosures on how the fair value of the pre-existing investment was calculated (e.g. whether the transaction price was deemed to be equal to fair value and if not, what factors led to the deviation). Question 8 (a) Is other information needed to properly understand the effect of the acquisition on a group? If so, what information is needed and why would it be useful? (b) Is there information required to be disclosed that is not useful and that should not be required? Please explain why. (c) What are the main challenges to preparing, auditing or enforcing the disclosures required by IFRS 3 or by the related amendments, and why? In order to evaluate the effect the business combination accounting will have on future EBIT, getting an idea on the future impact of business combinations on EBIT is extremely valuable. Therefore, we suggest to require preparers of financial statements to disclose a schedule on how depreciation and amortization of fair value adjustments and other quantifiable p&l effects from business combinations are expected to impact profit and loss in future years. This would
9 Page 9 of 10 also be useful for third party stakeholders trying to assess the value of a publicly listed reporting entity by way of income or cash flow based valuation models. IFRS 3.B64q requires the disclosure of the amount the acquiree contributed to the consolidated profit and loss of the current financial year. As profit and loss is not clearly defined preparers are free to choose which profit they disclose (e.g. EBIT, or EBT or net profit). Thus, the ability of users of financial statements to compare the disclosures between entities of the same industry is limited. This could be avoided by either clarifying which definition of profit (or loss) should be disclosed. Alternatively, preparers of financial statements should at least be required to disclose which definition of profit has been presented in the Group notes. IFRS 3.B64q(ii) currently requires that revenue and profit and loss are to be disclosed as if all business combinations had taken place on the first day of the reported financial year. Acquirees that are small- and medium sized entities generally do not report according to IFRS and thus, for the period prior to the acquisition date revenue and profit and loss figures generally are only available based on local GAAP guidelines. We suggest that if for the period prior to acquisition date financial data is only available according to accounting rules other than IFRS and if this is likely to have material impact on the reported revenue and profit and loss, the preparer of financial statements should disclose this fact and the most likely impact on the figures disclosed. We further suggest to include in IFRS 3 Appendix A a clarification on the definition of acquisition related costs, most notably if and to what extent internal costs are part of acquisition related costs. Question 9 Are there other matters that you think the IASB should be aware of as it considers the PiR of IFRS 3? The IASB is interested in: (a) understanding how useful the information that is provided by the Standard and the related amendments is, and whether improvements are needed, and why; (b) learning about practical implementation matters, whether from the perspective of applying, auditing or enforcing the Standard and the related amendments; and (c) any learning points for its standard-setting process. Implementation matters often arise in situations where IFRS 3 requires business accounting to be applied based on the preparers assessment of economic circumstances while the standard only provides very general guidance on how this economic circumstances should be assessed. One example for such a situation is the accounting guidance for determining whether a transaction is part of a business combination transaction, most notably the guidance for arrangements for contingent payments to employees or selling shareholders. Even we realize that there are limits to the level of detail the application guidance can provide, we suggest to include more practical examples in such application guidance sections appended to the standard.
10 Page 10 of 10 Question 10 From your point of view, which areas of IFRS 3 and related amendments: (a) represent benefits to users of financial statements, preparers, auditors and/or enforcers of financial information, and why; (b) have resulted in considerable unexpected costs to users of financial statements, preparers, auditors and/or enforcers of financial information, and why; or (c) have had an effect on how acquisitions are carried out (for example, an effect on contractual terms)? In contrast to not recording hidden reserves and losses separately, but amortizing goodwill over a period of no more than 20 years as required in IAS 22, we believe that the impairment only approach better reflects economic facts and circumstances. For entities that employ push down accounting and use KPIs which reflect both p&l and balance sheet numbers such as Economic Value Added (EVA) or Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) the impairment only approach leads to more useful results as both the p&l and the balance sheet (capital employed) are less affected by normalizations without economic basis (such as standardized scheduled goodwill amortization periods). Further we believe that the amendment in the accounting for step acquisitions in IFRS 3 (2008) increased both relevance and reliability of business combinations. Whereas the new rules provide more up to date information, the results are also likely to be more reliable. While in theory the approach of accounting for each share purchase step separately on a retrospective basis as required by IFRS 3 (2004) is appealing, the quality of data and information as of the date of past acquisition steps often was not good enough to produce relevant results. Even if sufficient data and information was available, the information generated by performing multiple steps of analysis as of different acquisition dates was not worth the time nor cost efficient. Additional costs of analysis and costs of internal communication have been caused by the implementation of the revised rules for the accounting of contingent consideration and for determining whether a transaction is part of a business combination transaction. Both rules impact the p&l and therefore require extensive explanation to different levels of management. It is necessary to anticipate potential p&l impacts so as to avoid management being surprised by adverse p&l effects after the closing of a transaction. This is especially true for the guidance on whether a transaction is part of a business combination, as the guidance included in the standard IFRS 3 is rather vague. Since IFRS 3 (2008) has become effective, we have observed that contingent payments to employees and selling shareholders are increasingly scrutinized due to potential adverse p&l impacts.
Constituents generally agreed that IFRS 3 is conceptually sound, but that it is often difficult to apply in practice, in New Zealand.
30 May 2014 Mr Hans Hoogervorst Chairman The International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Dear Hans Post-implementation Review of IFRS 3 Business Combinations
More informationWe welcome the opportunity to comment on the above post-implementation review.
31 May 2014 International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Dear Sir/Madam, IASB Post implementation Review: IFRS 3 Business Combinations Standard Chartered Bank
More informationRequest for Information Post-implementation Review IFRS 3 Business Combinations
Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London United Kingdom EC4M 6XH Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited 2 New Street Square London EC4A 3BZ United Kingdom Tel:
More informationVMEBF Bilanzierung in Familienunternehmen
Mr Hans Hoogervorst Chairman of the International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Weinheim, 03/03/2014 Dear Mr Hoogervorst, ED/2013/9 IFRS FOR SMES: PROPOSED
More informationSCHOENBRUNNER STRASSE /1/6 A-1120 VIENNA AUSTRIA. TEL +43 (1) FAX +43 (1) WEB
C/O KAMMER DER WIRTSCHAFTSTREUHÄNDER SCHOENBRUNNER STRASSE 222 228/1/6 A-1120 VIENNA AUSTRIA Mr Hans Hoogervorst, Chairman International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH
More informationInternational Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH UK. Cc: EFRAG. Oslo, November 29, Dear Sir/Madam
International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH UK Cc: EFRAG Oslo, November 29, 2012 Dear Sir/Madam Request for Information: Comprehensive Review of the IFRS for SMEs We appreciate
More information22 December EFRAG 35 Square de Meeûs B-1000 Brussels Belgium. Dear Sirs GOODWILL AND IMPAIRMENT ICAEW REP 197/16
22 December 2016 EFRAG 35 Square de Meeûs B-1000 Brussels Belgium Dear Sirs GOODWILL AND IMPAIRMENT ICAEW REP 197/16 ICAEW welcomes the opportunity to comment on the EFRAG/ ASBJ joint study entitled What
More informationStuttgart, Invitation to comment Exposure Draft ED/2012/3 Equity Method: Share of Other Net Asset Changes
Porsche Automobil Holding SE, Porscheplatz 1, 70435 Stuttgart, Germany International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London United Kingdom EC4M 6XH Porsche Automobil Holding SE Porscheplatz
More informationComment Letter on Exposure Draft ED/2017/2 Improvements to IFRS 8 Operating Segments (Proposed amendments to IFRS 8 and IAS 34)
ss KPMG IFRG Limited Tel +44 (0) 20 7694 8871 15 Canada Square Fax +44 (0) 20 7694 8429 London E14 5GL United Kingdom mark.vaessen@kpmgifrg.com Mr Hans Hoogervorst International Accounting Standards Board
More informationRef: IASB s Exposure Draft Accounting Policy Changes Proposed amendments to IAS 8
ESMA Regular Use Date: 25 June 2018 ESMA32-61-271 Mr Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) 30 Cannon Street EC4M 6XH London United Kingdom Ref: IASB s Exposure Draft
More informationANC s comments on the Post-Implementation Review main issues are presented below.
AUTORITÉ DES NORMES COMPTABLES 5, PLACE DES VINS DE FRANCE 75573 PARIS CÉDE 12 Phone (+ 33 1) 53.44.28 53 Internet http://www.anc.gouv.fr/ Mel patrick.de-cambourg@anc.gouv.fr Paris, 22 nd September, 2017
More informationSummary of responses to RfI in Korea
Summary of responses to RfI in Korea May 2014 Korea Accounting Standards Board (KASB) Contents 1. Your background and experience 2. Definition of a business 3. Fair value 4. Separate recognition of intangible
More informationRe: Comments on IASB s Exposure Draft on Classification and Measurement: Limited Amendments to IFRS 9
March 27, 2013 Mr. Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Dear Hans, Re: Comments on IASB s Exposure Draft on Classification
More informationOur detailed comments and responses to the fifteen questions raised in the DP are set out below.
C/O KAMMER DER WIRTSCHAFTSTREUHÄNDER SCHOENBRUNNER STRASSE 222 228/1/6 A-1120 VIENNA AUSTRIA Mr Hans Hoogervorst, Chairman International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH
More informationOrganismo Italiano di Contabilità OIC (The Italian Standard Setter) Italy, Roma, Via Poli 29 Tel. 0039/06/ fax 0039/06/
Organismo Italiano di Contabilità OIC (The Italian Standard Setter) Italy, 00187 Roma, Via Poli 29 Tel. 0039/06/6976681 fax 0039/06/69766830 Mr. Alan Teixeira Senior Project Manager IASB 30 Cannon Street
More informationInternational Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs ) A Briefing for Chief Executives, Audit Committees & Boards of Directors
2012 International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs ) A Briefing for Chief Executives, Audit Committees & Boards of Directors 2012 International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs ) A Briefing for
More informationESMA s REVIEW OF THE APPLICATION OF BUSINESS COMBINATION ACCOUNTING INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING BULLETIN 2014/10
ESMA s REVIEW OF THE APPLICATION OF BUSINESS COMBINATION ACCOUNTING INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING BULLETIN 2014/10 Background The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has released a report
More informationBusiness combinations (phase I) July 2002
July 2002 The International Accounting Standards Board met in London 16-19 July 2002, when it discussed: Business combinations Consolidation and special purpose entities Convergence of accounting standards
More informationRe: Request for Information Post-implementation Review IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement
Mr Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6H United Kingdom Email: commentletters@ifrs.org 22 September 2017 Re: Request for Information Post-implementation
More informationRe: IASB Request for information: Comprehensive review of the IFRS for SMEs
Mr Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street GB LONDON EC4M 6XH E-mail: commentletters@ifrs.org 14 December 2012 Ref.: FRP/PRJ/TSI/IDS Dear Chairman, Re: IASB
More informationSent electronically through at
Our Ref.: C/FRSC Sent electronically through email at strategyreview-comm@ifrs.org 22 July 2011 Tom Seidenstein Chief Operating Officer IFRS Foundation 30 Cannon Street, London EC4M 6XH, United Kingdom
More informationNEX T GENER ATION FINANCE. NOW. Annual Financial Report as at December 31, 2016
NEXT G E N E R AT I O N FINANCE. N O W. as at Page 2 CONTENT REPORT FROM THE SUPERVISORY BOARD 04 ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (IFRS) 08 Balance Sheet 09 Income Statement 11 Statement of Cash flows 12 Statement
More informationNew items for initial consideration IAS 12 Income Taxes Recognition of deferred taxes when acquiring a single-asset entity
STAFF PAPER IFRS Interpretations Committee Meeting September 2016 Project Paper topic New items for initial consideration IAS 12 Income Taxes Recognition of deferred taxes when acquiring a single-asset
More informationESMA Report. Review on the application of accounting requirements for business combinations in IFRS financial statements. 16 June 2014/ESMA/2014/643
ESMA Report Review on the application of accounting requirements for business combinations in IFRS financial statements 16 June 2014/ESMA/2014/643 Date: 16 June 2014 ESMA/2014/643 Table of Contents Contents
More informationWe are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors
We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists 4,100 116,000 120M Open access books available International authors and editors Downloads Our
More informationComment Letter on Financial Instruments Exposure Draft
International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) First Floor 30 Cannon Street London, EC4M 6XH United Kingdom 15 September, 2009 Comment Letter on Financial Instruments Exposure Draft Dear Board Members,
More informationDecember 10, International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom
December 10, 2012 International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom RE: IFRS for SMEs Comprehensive Review - Request for Information Dear Board Members, We are sending
More informationThis response summarizes the perspectives shared by our country members, as per the following due process.
December 18 th, 2014 International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom RE: Invitation to comment on the Recognition of Deferred Tax Assets for Unrealised Losses (Amendments
More informationUS GAAP versus IFRS. The basics. October 2016
versus The basics October 2016 Table of contents Introduction... 2 Financial statement presentation... 4 Interim financial reporting... 8 Consolidation, joint venture accounting and equity method investees/associates...
More informationI am writing on behalf of the Conseil National de la Comptabilité (CNC) to express our views on the above-mentioned Discussion Paper.
CONSEIL NATIONAL DE LA COMPTABILITE 3, BOULEVARD DIDEROT 75572 PARIS CEDEX 12 Phone 01 53 44 52 01 Fax 01 53 18 99 43 / 01 53 44 52 33 Internet E-mail LE PRÉSIDENT JFL/MPC http://www.cnc.minefi.gouv.fr
More informationRequest for Information Comprehensive Review of the IFRS for SMEs. response to request. 3 December 2012
Request for Information Comprehensive Review of the IFRS for SMEs response to request 3 December 2012 CIPFA, the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy, is the professional body for people
More informationInternational Financial Reporting Standard. Small and Medium-sized Entities
A Staff Overview This overview of the IASB s exposure draft of a proposed International Financial Reporting Standard for Small and Medium-sized Entities (IFRS for SMEs) was prepared by Paul Pacter, IASB
More informationBusiness combinations
May 2004 The International Accounting Standards Board met in London on 18 and 19 May 2004, when it discussed: Business combinations (phase II) Consolidation Financial instruments Financial risk disclosures
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate General Internal Market and Services. CAPITAL AND COMPANIES Accounting and financial reporting
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate General Internal Market and Services CAPITAL AND COMPANIES Accounting and financial reporting Brussels, 15/05/2014 MARKT F3 (2014) Endorsement of Annual Improvements to
More informationIASB Exposure Draft of Proposed Amendments to IFRS 3, Business Combinations
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Hill House 1 Little New Street London EC4A 3TR United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)20 7936 3000 Fax: +44 (0)20 7583 8517 www.deloitte.com Mr. Alan Teixeira Senior Project Manager International
More informationLONDON EC4M 6XH. Re: IASB Questionnaire on Possible Recognition and Measurement Modifications for Small and Medium-sized Entities (SMEs)
PARIS, 2 ND JUNE, 2005 CL 16 M. Paul PACTER Director of Standards for SMEs IASB 30 Cannon Street LONDON EC4M 6XH Re: IASB Questionnaire on Possible Recognition and Measurement Modifications for Small and
More informationDelivering value through transformation. Practical Guide to New Singapore Financial Reporting Standards for 2014
Delivering value through transformation to New Singapore Financial for 2014 Contents Introduction 4 Developments in IFRS not yet adopted by ASC 5 1. New/revised standards and interpretations 6 FRS 27
More informationIASB update: Progress and Plans
Agenda paper 2.1 International Financial Reporting Standards IASB update: Progress and Plans November 2014 The views expressed in this presentation are those of the presenter, not necessarily those of
More informationBaden-Baden CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Baden-Baden CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS for the year ended December 31, 2016 Berlin CONTENT DECLARATION OF THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 2-3 BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORT 4-17 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
More informationInvitation to comment Exposure Draft ED/2017/5 Accounting Policies and Accounting Estimates - Proposed amendments to IAS 8
Ernst & Young Global Limited Tel: +44 [0]20 7980 0000 6 More London Place Fax: +44 [0]20 7980 0275 London ey.com SE1 2DA Tel: 023 8038 2000 International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London
More informationRe: Revenue from Contracts with Customers November 2011
Mr Hans Hoogervorst Chairman of the International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EX4M 6XH United Kingdom Our Ref. Phone Fax E-mail Date CTL/HDF +49-89-7445-4555 +49-89-7445-4874 Crispin.Teufel@linde-le.com
More informationExposure Draft ED 2013/10 Equity Method in Separate Financial Statements
Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London United Kingdom EC4M 6XH Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited 2 New Street Square London EC4A 3BZ United Kingdom Tel:
More informationthe lack of clarity about the nature of the Right-of-Use (RoU) asset, and possible consequences for regulatory capital treatment; and
David Schraa Regulatory Counsel September 13, 2013 Mr. Russell Golden, Chairman Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 PO Box 5116 Norwalk, Connecticut 06856-5116 Mr. Hans Hoogervorst, Chairman
More informationwxyz890- TUV Sir David Tweedie Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London United Kingdom EC4M 6XH
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu 2 New Street Square London EC4A 3BZ United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) 20 7936 3000 Fax: +44 (0) 20 7583 1198 www.deloitte.com Direct: +44 20 7007 0907 Direct Fax: +44 20 7007 0158 kwild@deloitte.co.uk
More informationRequest for Information: Comprehensive Review of IFRS for SMEs
30 November 2012 Level 7, 600 Bourke Street MELBOURNE VIC 3000 Postal Address PO Box 204 Collins Street West VIC 8007 Telephone: (03) 9617 7600 Facsimile: (03) 9617 7608 Mr Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International
More informationA OSSG Comments on I ASB Request for Information Comprehensive Review of the I F RS for SM Es
11 December 2012 Mr. Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH UNITED KINGDOM Dear Mr. Hoogervorst, A OSSG Comments on I ASB Request for Information
More informationTHE GROUP AT A GLANCE 2016
THE GROUP AT A GLANCE 2016 Key figures 01 IN MILLION 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 1 IFRS IFRS IFRS IFRS IFRS Business development Revenue 2,343.2 2,222.0 2,061.4 1,939.0 1,820.6 Personnel expenses 1,421.2
More informationApril 1, Sir David. Tweedie Chairman. Dear David, the IASB. Impairment. achieved on. observer. Page 1 of 8
April 1, 2011 Sir David Tweedie Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Dear David, Re: Comments on IASB s Supplement to ED on Financial Instruments:
More informationSagicor Real Estate X Fund Limited. Financial Statements 31 December 2014
Financial Statements Draft date: 31/03/2015 Index Page Independent Auditors' Report to the Shareholders Financial Statements Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income 1 Consolidated Statement of Financial
More informationTHE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA (set up by an Act of Parliament)
23 January, 2015 Mr. Hans Hoogervorst Chairman, International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Dear Hans, Sub: ICAI comments on IASB Discussion Paper: Reporting
More informationre: Comments on Request for Views on Agenda Consultation 2011
Mr. Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom 30 November 2011 Dear Mr. Hoogervorst: re: Comments on Request for Views on Agenda
More informationThe IDW appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Exposure Draft Insurance
Mr Hans Hoogervorst Chairman of the International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom 23 October 2013 567/550 Dear Mr Hoogervorst Re.: IFRS Exposure Draft 2013/7
More informationDeutsches Rechnungslegungs Standards Committee e.v. Accounting Standards Committee of Germany
e. V. Zimmerstr. 30 10969 Berlin Mr Hans Hoogervorst Chairman of the International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom IFRS Technical Committee Telefon: +49 (0)30
More informationComments on the Exposure Draft Financial Instruments: Amortised Cost and Impairment
June 30, 2010 International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Dear Sir or Madame, Comments on the Exposure Draft Financial Instruments: Amortised Cost and Impairment
More informationLogwin AG. Interim Financial Report as of 30 June 2018
Logwin AG Interim Financial Report as of 30 June 2018 Key Figures 1 January 30 June 2018 Earnings position In thousand EUR 2018 2017 Revenues Group 540,104 541,383 Change on 2017-0.2 % Air + Ocean 361,316
More informationACCOUNTING POLICIES. for the year ended 30 June MURRAY & ROBERTS ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 13
12 MURRAY & ROBERTS ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 13 ACCOUNTING POLICIES for the year ended 30 June 2013 1 PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS These accounting policies are consistent with the previous
More informationCONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SUEZ ENVIRONNEMENT COMPANY FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SUEZ ENVIRONNEMENT COMPANY FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014 FINANCIAL INFORMATION RELATING TO THE COMPANY S ASSETS, FINANCIAL POSITION AND REVENUES
More informationC ONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. Algeco Scotsman Global S.à r.l. Years Ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 With Report of Independent Auditors
C ONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Algeco Scotsman Global S.à r.l. Years Ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 With Report of Independent Auditors Table of Contents Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive
More informationOCI and relevance of performance measures: recent inquiry by IASB
International Financial Reporting Standards OCI and relevance of performance measures: recent inquiry by IASB Nov. 8, 2016, Maui Wei-Guo Zhang, IASB member The views expressed in this presentation are
More informationRe: Request for Information: Comprehensive Review of the IFRS for SMEs
International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Dear Sirs, 29 November 2012 Re: Request for Information: Comprehensive Review of the IFRS for SMEs The Institute
More informationIASB Exposure Drafts Financial Instruments: Classification and Measurement and Fair Value Measurement. London, September 10 th, 2009
International Accounting Standards Board First Floor 30 Cannon Street, EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Submitted via www.iasb.org IASB Exposure Drafts Financial Instruments: Classification and Measurement and
More informationF Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
F Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. 192 1. Significant accounting policies 203 2. Accounting estimates and assessments 205 3. Significant acquisitions and dispositions of interests in companies
More informationCONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SUEZ ENVIRONNEMENT COMPANY FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014 AND 2013
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SUEZ ENVIRONNEMENT COMPANY FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014 AND 2013 1 FINANCIAL INFORMATION RELATING TO THE COMPANY S ASSETS, FINANCIAL POSITION AND REVENUES
More informationLondon, Tuesday, 31 July, IASB Announces Agenda of Technical Projects
International Accounting Standards Board Press Release London, Tuesday, 31 July, 2001 IASB Announces Agenda of Technical Projects After extensive consultation with its Standards Advisory Council, national
More informationCONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, Consolidation and Group Reporting Department
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2012 Consolidation and Group Reporting Department CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET Notes June 30, 2012 Dec. 31, 2011 ASSETS Goodwill (3) 11,281 11,041
More information114 Consolidated Statement of Operations. 116 Consolidated Statement of Financial Position. 117 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
113 Content Consolidated Financial Statements 114 Consolidated Statement of Operations 115 Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income 116 Consolidated Statement of Financial Position 117 Consolidated
More informationExposure Draft ED 2015/6 Clarifications to IFRS 15
Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London United Kingdom EC4M 6XH Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited 2 New Street Square London EC4A 3BZ United Kingdom Tel:
More informationThe basics November 2013
versus The basics November 2013 Table of contents Introduction... 2 Financial statement presentation... 3 Interim financial reporting... 6 Consolidation, joint venture accounting and equity method investees/associates...
More informationInternational Accounting Standard 36. Impairment of Assets
International Accounting Standard 36 Impairment of Assets CONTENTS paragraphs BASIS FOR CONCLUSIONS ON IAS 36 IMPAIRMENT OF ASSETS INTRODUCTION SCOPE MEASURING RECOVERABLE AMOUNT Recoverable amount based
More informationDeutsches Rechnungslegungs Standards Committee e.v. Accounting Standards Committee of Germany
ASCG Zimmerstr. 30 10969 Berlin Mr Hans Hoogervorst Chairman of the International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom IFRS Technical Committee Phone: +49 (0)30 206412-12
More informationHans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH. To: Date: 14 January 2014
To: Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH Date: 14 January 2014 DP/2013/1: A Review of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting Dear
More informationYour reference/letter of Our reference/name Tel. extension/ Fax extension Date/Document Page
TÜV SÜD Industrie Service GmbH 80684 Munich Germany DAP-PL-2885.99 DAP-IS-2886.00 DAP-PL-3089.00 DAP-PL-2722 DAP-IS-3516.01 DPT-ZE-3510.02 ZLS-ZE-219/99 ZLS-ZE-246/99 Your reference/letter of Our reference/name
More informationDeutsches Rechnungslegungs Standards Committee e.v. Accounting Standards Committee of Germany
e. V. Zimmerstr. 30 10969 Berlin Wayne Upton Chairman of the IFRS Interpretations Committee 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom IFRS Technical Committee Phone: +49 (0)30 206412-12 E-Mail: info@drsc.de
More informationDiscussion Paper DP/2013/1 A Review of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting
International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Stockholm 9 January, 2014 Discussion Paper DP/2013/1 A Review of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting
More informationConsolidated financial statements. December 31, 2017
Consolidated financial statements December 31, 2017 Table of contents 1.Consolidated statement of income... 2 Other comprehensive income... 3 2. Consolidated statement of cash flows... 4 3. Consolidated
More informationDecember 10, International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom
December 10, 2012 International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom RE: IFRS for SMEs Comprehensive Review - Request for Information Dear Board Members, The Group
More informationPAAB SUBMISSION ON ED 2015/7- CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING
20 November 2015 IFRS Foundation 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Email: commentletters@ifrs.org Dear Sir/Madam PAAB SUBMISSION ON ED 2015/07 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING
More informationRe: OIC response to the IASB Exposure Draft Financial Instruments: Impairment
Organismo Italiano di Contabilità OIC (The Italian Standard Setter) Italy, 00187 Roma, Via Poli 29 Tel. 0039/06/6976681 fax 0039/06/69766830 e-mail: presidenza@fondazioneoic.it Mr Hans HOOGERVORST Chairman
More informationC/O KAMMER DER WIRTSCHAFTSTREUHÄNDER
C/O KAMMER DER WIRTSCHAFTSTREUHÄNDER SCHOENBRUNNER STRASSE 222 228/1/6 A-1120 VIENNA AUSTRIA Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom
More informationRe: Exposure Draft Classification and Measurement: Limited Amendments to IFRS 9
16 April 2013 International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Dear Sir/Madam, Re: Exposure Draft Classification and Measurement: Limited Amendments to IFRS 9 On
More informationRe: Equity Method in Separate Financial Statements (Proposed amendments to IAS 27), exposure draft
11 February 2014 International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Dear Sir/Madam, Re: Equity Method in Separate Financial Statements (Proposed amendments to IAS
More informationThe basics November 2012
versus The basics November 2012!@# Table of contents Introduction... 2 Financial statement presentation... 3 Interim financial reporting... 6 Consolidation, joint venture accounting and equity method
More informationRe: Financial Instruments: Impairment, Supplement to ED/2009/12
April 1, 2011 International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street, 1st Floor London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Dear Sirs: Re: Financial Instruments: Impairment, Supplement to ED/2009/12 This letter
More informationApril 12, Submitted electronically via
277 Wellington Street West, Toronto, ON Canada M5V 3H2 Tel: (416) 977-3222 Fax: (416) 204-3412 www.frascanada.ca 277 rue Wellington Ouest, Toronto (ON) Canada M5V 3H2 Tél: (416) 977-3222 Téléc: (416) 204-3412
More informationGrupo Latinoamericano de Emisores de Normas de Información Financiera
October 25, 2013 International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Re: Exposure Draft (ED/2013/7) on Insurance Contracts Dear Board Members, The Group of Latin American
More informationRe: Exposure Draft - Applying IFRS 9 Financial Instruments with IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts (Proposed amendments to IFRS 4) (ED/2015/11)
277 Wellington Street West, Toronto, ON Canada M5V 3H2 Tel: (416) 977-3222 Fax: (416) 204-3412 www.frascanada.ca 277 rue Wellington Ouest, Toronto (ON) Canada M5V 3H2 Tél: (416) 977-3222 Téléc : (416)
More informationINDEPENDENT AUDITOR S REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF
50 CIM FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD INDEPENDENT AUDITOR S REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF Report on the Audit of the Financial Statements Opinion We have audited the financial statements of CIM Financial Services Ltd
More informationConsolidated Financial Statements and Notes
Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes 122 Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes Statement of Profit or Loss Other Comprehensive Income Statement of Profit or Loss Other Comprehensive Income
More informationIFRS Viewpoint. Common control business combinations
Accounting Tax Global IFRS Viewpoint Common control business combinations What s the issue? How should an entity account for a business combination involving entities under common control? This is an important
More informationCONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 31 DECEMBER 2013
134 Aramex PJSC and its subsidiaries CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 31 DECEMBER 135 136 137 Aramex PJSC and its subsidiaries CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 31 DECEMBER Consolidated Statement of Financial
More informationAgenda item request: Issues related to the application of IFRS 5 Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations
The Chair 2 December 2013 ESMA/2013/1773 Wayne Upton Chairman of IFRS IC Cannon Street 30 London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Agenda item request: Issues related to the application of IFRS 5 Non-current assets
More informationHans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standard Board (IASB) 30 Cannon Street London, EC4M 6XH
THE CHAIRPERSON Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standard Board (IASB) 30 Cannon Street London, EC4M 6XH EBA/2015/D/376 25 November 2015 Exposure Draft: Conceptual Framework for Financial
More informationYour reference/letter of Our reference/name Tel. extension/ Fax extension Date/Document Page
TÜV SÜD Industrie Service GmbH Westendstrasse 199 80686 Munich Germany CDM Team DAP-PL-2885.99 DAP-IS-2886.00 DAP-PL-3089.00 DAP-PL-2722 DAP-IS-3516.01 DPT-ZE-3510.02 ZLS-ZE-219/99 ZLS-ZE-246/99 Your reference/letter
More informationEndorsement of the amendments to IAS 36 Recoverable Amount Disclosures for Non-Financial Assets
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Internal Market and Services Directorate General CAPITAL AND COMPANIES Accounting Brussels, MARKT F3 D(2013) Endorsement of the amendments to IAS 36 Recoverable Amount Disclosures for
More informationResponse to Exposure Draft of Proposed Amendments to IFRS 3, 'Business Combinations'
Our ref: smk 28 October 2005 Alan Teixeira Esq. Senior Project Manager International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH Chiltern pic 3 Sheldon Square London W2 6PS T: 020 73399000
More informationThe basics December 2011
versus The basics December 2011!@# Table of contents Introduction... 2 Financial statement presentation... 4 Interim financial reporting... 6 Consolidation, joint venture accounting and equity method
More informationWelcome to the May IASB Update
May 2016 Welcome to the May IASB Update The International Accounting Standards Board (the Board) met in public from 17 to 19 May 2016 at the IFRS Foundation's offices in London, UK. The topics for discussion
More informationDear Mr. Hoogervorst,
Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH Paris, October 25 th 2013 Re: IASB ED / 2013 / 7 Insurance Contracts Dear Mr. Hoogervorst, CNP Assurances
More informationAssociation of Accounting Technicians response to the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) consultation document Improving the Statement of Cash Flows
Association of Accounting Technicians response to the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) consultation document Improving the Statement of Cash Flows 1 Association of Accounting Technicians response to the
More informationCONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, Direction de la CONSOLIDATION REPORTING GROUPE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2010 Direction de la CONSOLIDATION REPORTING GROUPE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET Notes Dec. 31, 2010 Dec. 31, 2009 ASSETS Goodwill (3) 11,030 10,740 Other intangible
More information