GFSI BENCHMARKING REQUIREMENTS GFSI GUIDANCE DOCUMENT VERSION 7.1
|
|
- Alannah Walters
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 GFSI BENCHMARKING REQUIREMENTS GFSI GUIDANCE DOCUMENT VERSION 7.1 PART I THE BENCHMARKING PROCESS
2 CONTENTS Introduction Application GFSI Scopes of Recognition...4 Defining the Scope...5 Benchmarking Options Benchmarking Re-benchmarking Extensions to Scope of Recognition for Schemes Benchmarked Against V Significant Change The GFSI Benchmark Methodology Introduction The Key Procedural Steps Step 1: Scheme Owner Fills out the Self-Assessment Step 2: Preliminary Desk Review of the Self-Assessment Step 3: Call to Go through Findings Step 4: Scheme Owner Updates (where applicable) Resends Final Self- Assessment Step 5: Office Visit Step 6: Public Stakeholder Consultation Step 7: GFSI Board Final Decision Communication Step 8: Annual Assessment Based on GFSI Integrity Programme Sanctioning GFSI Appeals Procedure - GFSI Recognition The GFSI Benchmarking Requirements PART I THE BENCHMARKING PROCESS
3 PART I THE BENCHMARKING PROCESS Introduction The Global Food Safety Initiative works closely together with stakeholders Scheme Owners to provide continuous improvement in food safety management systems to ensure confidence in the delivery of safe food to consumers worldwide. We have used this input to develop the version 7 (V7) Benchmark criteria, also adopt a new approach towards our Benchmarking procedure. We seek to increase transparency streamline the Benchmarking procedure in a more uniform manner, thus enabling GFSI Benchmarked Scheme Owners to efficiently comply with the criteria laid out in the GFSI Benchmarking Requirements V7. It will contribute to the following GFSI objectives: 1. Reduce food safety risks by delivering equivalence convergence between effective food safety management systems. 2. Manage cost in the global food system by eliminating redundancy improving operational efficiency. 3. Develop competencies capacity building in food safety to create consistent effective global food systems. 4. Provide a unique international stakeholder platform for collaboration, knowledge exchange networking This section is the first part of the GFSI Benchmarking Requirements, which has been developed published by the Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI) to specify the requirements for the recognition of food safety schemes. The detailed steps procedures developed by GFSI serve to demonstrate that the GFSI benchmarking process is carried out in an impartial transparent manner by a technically competent Benchmark Leader under the supervision of GFSI Technical Manager. The objective of this document is to give stakeholders a clear insight into the benchmark process for GFSI Benchmarking Requirements V7. Further clarification will be provided during the application process. The benchmarking process carried out by GFSI is the method by which a food safety Scheme Owner is objectively compared to the defined requirements as set out in the GFSI Benchmarking Requirements V7 to determine equivalence. GFSI shall ensure that the process of GFSI benchmarking associated procedures are transparent open to stakeholder scrutiny. The systems procedures associated with the GFSI benchmarking process will be reviewed, maintained updated to ensure consistency integrity. 1 Application Any Scheme Owner that wishes to be recognised must apply via the GFSI website. The Scheme Owner downloads an application form template finds detailed guidance for the completion of the application supporting documents. The Scheme Owner s application must include GFSI Benchmarking Requirements Part II (Requirements for the Management of Schemes) at least one industry scope. The GFSI Technical Manager shall review the application, if in agreement, shall send a contract to cover all aspects of the benchmarking process as well as terms conditions. The GFSI Technical Manager reserves the right to reject or refer an application back to the Scheme Owner if the quality of the application is poor. An applicant Scheme Owner shall be permitted to lodge multiple benchmarking applications with GFSI, but shall only be permitted to submit one re-submission within a twelve-month period, if the initial application is deemed to be unsuccessful. A list with available Benchmark Leaders will be presented on the GFSI website. The GFSI Technical Manager will appoint a Benchmark Leader for the Scheme record the selection in the application file. The Technical Manager may assign additional Benchmark Leaders to ensure that the benchmarking takes place within the desired timeframe. This will be done with the written consent of the Scheme Owner. Once the GFSI Technical Manager accepts the Scheme for benchmarking, the benchmarking process will only progress once a contract has been signed between the applicant Scheme Owner GFSI. The GFSI Benchmarking Requirements 3
4 After the signed contract is received, the GFSI Technical Manager shall transfer all appropriate excel files for selfassessment to the Scheme Owner present a work plan. This work plan of activities key dates will be agreed upon by the GFSI Technical Manager, the Benchmark Leader the Scheme Owner based on the number of scopes volume of documentation submitted. Confirmation of acceptance of the work plan shall be published on the GFSI website Benchmarking DEFINING THE SCOPE Every Scheme Owner that applies shall have a defined scope in relation to food safety or services directly associated with food safety, which shall be subject to certification by accredited Certification Bodies. GFSI has set up several requirements for the management of the schemes. These requirements are described in Part II apply to all Scheme Owners wishing to go through the GFSI benchmarking process for V7. GFSI has clearly defined scopes in relation to products or services for which Schemes can seek recognition by GFSI. The Scheme shall clearly specify the scope of activity within its application to GFSI. GFSI has categorised the food supply chain into sectors sub-sectors in which there is a defined series of requirements for food safety criteria which are dependent upon the relevant sector. These requirements shall be clearly defined in the stard of the applicant s Scheme as these shall be assessed against the requirements of the relevant section of the GFSI Benchmarking Requirements (Reference Part III Scheme Scope Key Elements). A Scheme s stard may have a major focus or historical focus other than those related to food safety. Only those requirements relating to food safety shall be assessed by GFSI for the purpose of recognition. The GFSI sector sub-sector scopes for recognition are as follows; The GFSI sector sub-sector scopes for recognition are as follows; GFSI SCOPE OF RECOGNITION (Benchmarking Category Code) BENCHMARKING CATEGORY NAME EXAMPLES OF PRODUCTS / SERVICES AND METHOD OF PRODUCTION AI AII BI BII C Farming of Animals for Meat/ Milk/ Eggs/ Honey Farming of Fish Seafood Farming of Plants (other than grains pulses) Farming of Grains Pulses Animal Conversion Animals (other than fish seafood) used for meat production, egg production, milk production or honey production Growing, keeping, trapping hunting (slaughtering at point of hunting) Fish seafood used for meat production Growing, trapping fishing (slaughtering at point of capture) Growing or harvesting of plants (other than grains pulses) for food Growing or harvesting of grains pulses for food Lairage, slaughter, evisceration, bulk chilling, bulk freezing of animals Gutting, bulk freezing of fish Storage of game 4 The GFSI Benchmarking Requirements
5 D Pre-process hling of plant products, nuts grain De-shelling of nuts Drying of grain Grading of fruit vegetables Storage Cleaning, washing, rinsing, fluming, sorting, grading, trimming, bundling, cooling, hydro-cooling, waxing, drenching, packing, re-packing, staging, storing, loading / or any other hling activity that does not significantly transform the product from its original harvested form. E I E II E III Processing of perishable animal products Processing of perishable plant products Processing of perishable animal plant products (mixed products) Production of animal products including fish seafood Meat, eggs, dairy fish products Deboning, cutting, washing, trimming, grading, pasteurisation, cooking, curing, fermentation, smoking, chilling, freezing, packed in modified atmosphere, packed in vacuum packing Production of plant products (products (including grains, nuts, pulses) Washing, slicing, dicing, cutting, shredding, peeling, grading, pasteurisation, cooking, chilling, juicing, pressing, freezing, packed in modified atmosphere, packed in vacuum packing or any other activity that significantly transforms the product from its original whole state Production of animal plant products Mixing, cooking, chilling, freezing, packed in modified atmosphere, packed in vacuum packing E IV Processing of ambient stable products Production of food products from any source that are stored sold at ambient temperature Aseptic filling, baking, bottling, brewing, canning, cooking, distilling, drying, extrusion, fermentation, freeze drying, pressing, frying, hot filling, irradiating, milling, mixing blending, packed in modified atmosphere, packed in vacuum packing, pasteurising, pickling, roasting, salting refining The GFSI Benchmarking Requirements 5
6 FI G H I J K L M N Production of feed Catering Retail / Wholesale Provision of Food Safety Services Provision of Storage Distribution Services Food Feed Manufacture of Food Processing Equipment Production of (Bio) Chemicals (Additives, Vitamins, Minerals, Bio-cultures, Flavourings, Enzymes Processing aids) Production of Food Packaging Food Broker / Agent Production of feed from a single or mixed food source Drying, cooking, milling, mixing blending extrusion Production of food products from any source for consumption outside the home Cooking, mixing blending, preparation of component products Provision of finished food feed products to a customer Retailing wholesaling of food feed Supply of services related to the safe production of food Water Supply Pest Control Cleaning Services Test Laboratories Storage facilities for food feed Distribution vehicles for food feed Production of food feed processing equipment Production of food feed additives, vitamins, minerals, bio-cultures, flavourings, enzymes processing aids Production of food feed packaging, packaging materials, packaging components in the form of raw materials, part processed, semi converted, converted or fully finished packaging materials products for use in the supply chain. The supply of finished food feed products 6 The GFSI Benchmarking Requirements
7 BENCHMARKING OPTIONS Benchmarking The requirements specified within this clause shall apply to Schemes, which have: not previously undergone benchmarking by GFSI, been assessed previously, but have withdrawn the application without completing the benchmarking process. been previously recognised by GFSI, but have had recognition withdrawn. GFSI will require the applicant Scheme Owner to submit an application for recognition to GFSI together with supporting evidence proving that; the Scheme Owner is a legal entity. the Scheme Owner is not a Certification Body shall not be governed or owned by one or more certification bodies. there is an agreement with one or more Accreditation Bodies for Certification Bodies to operate to ISO/IEC or ISO /IEC for the scope of their Scheme. The Accreditation Bodies granting accreditation to the scope of the Scheme shall be members of the International Accreditation Forum (IAF) shall be signatories to the Multilateral Recognition Arrangement (MLA). contractual relationships exist with at least two Certification Bodies that have accreditation for the scope of the Scheme with an Accreditation Body. the Scheme has in place ten valid accredited certificates (for each relevant scope of the application) issued by Certification Bodies, including at least one valid certificate issued by each contracted Certification Body during a twelve-month period prior to the date of the application. the Scheme has been operational for a minimum period of twelve months prior to the date of application. During this period, certificates have been issued to a number of organisations. A Scheme is deemed to become operational on the date on which the first accredited certificate is issued by a Certification Body. the Scheme shall not be undergoing a significant change (See criteria for significant change to its stard, management, governance or operational procedures at the time of application of recognition by GFSI). the Scheme shall not have any practices that are deemed as restricting access to markets. the Scheme has undertaken a self-assessment to validate that the Scheme management requirements are in compliance with the GFSI Benchmarking Requirements Re-benchmarking The requirements specified within this section of the GFSI Benchmarking Requirements shall apply to: Schemes that have successfully undergone benchmarking by GFSI. All existing GFSI-recognised Schemes under V6 have to undergo re-benchmarking for all the scopes against the GFSI Benchmark criteria V7 within the time period of 12 months from publication of V7. GFSI Board has the authority to extend this period under special circumstances. Schemes which have been subject to suspension by GFSI or have temporarily or voluntarily agreed on withdrawal in accordance with the GFSI Executive Director for any other reason for a period of less than 1 year from suspension or withdrawal. GFSI will require the applicant Scheme Owner to submit an application for recognition to GFSI together with supporting evidence proving that: there is an agreement with one or more Accreditation Bodies for Certification Bodies to operate to ISO/ IEC ISO17065 or ISO /IEC for the scope of their Scheme. The Accreditation Bodies granting accreditation to the scope of the Scheme shall be members of the International Accreditation Forum (IAF) shall be signatories to the Multilateral Recognition Arrangement (MLA). there are contractual relationships with at least two Certification Bodies, who are accredited with an Accreditation Body for the relevant scope for which the Scheme is applying for recognition. the Scheme has in place 10 accredited certificates (for the relevant scope of the application) issued by Certification Bodies, during a twelve-month period prior to the date of the suspension or withdrawal. The GFSI Benchmarking Requirements 7
8 the Scheme shall not be undergoing a significant change to its stard, management, governance or operational procedures at the time of application of recognition by GFSI will have completed all activities that remedy or re-establish the Scheme after the suspension or withdrawal Extensions to Scope of Recognition for Schemes Benchmarked Against V7 The requirements specified within this clause shall apply to Schemes, which are: already benchmarked against V7 for different scope/ scopes seeking to apply for a new GFSI scope of recognition. seeking an extension for a new stard (scope of accreditation) within the GFSI scope of recognition, for which they are currently recognised. This will not include change to the governance or ownership or the management system. seeking an extension of an existing recognised scope, where there has been change to the Scheme s stard or operational normative documents, but these changes do not represent significant change which could compromise the Scheme s recognition by GFSI. GFSI will require the applicant Scheme Owner to submit an application for recognition to GFSI together with supporting evidence proving that; there is an agreement with one or more Accreditation Bodies for Certification Bodies to operate to ISO/ IEC or ISO /IEC for initial accreditation programme or the scope extension of their Scheme. The Accreditation Bodies granting accreditation to the scope of the Scheme shall be members of the International Accreditation Forum (IAF) shall be signatories to the Multilateral Recognition Arrangement (MLA). there are contractual relationships with at least two Certification Bodies, who are accredited with an Accreditation Body for the scope for which the Scheme is applying for recognition. the Scheme has in place ten certificates (for the relevant new scope of the application) issued by contracted Certification Bodies to demonstrate market dem, including at least one certificate issued by at least two Certification Bodies. There must be formal acknowledgment evidence provided that accredited certification for the scope extension shall be in place within one year. twelve months prior to the date of application. A Scheme is deemed to become operational on the date on which the first accredited certificate is issued by an Accredited Certification Body. From the moment when GFSI starts to finalise the new version of the benchmarking requirements, GFSI will no longer accept any applications from new Scheme Owners for a period of one year. A notice will be displayed on the GFSI website to indicate the starting date of this one-year period. Additionally, GFSI will not accept any applications for scope extension from existing Scheme Owners in the last 6 months of this one-year period Significant Change A Scheme seeking continued recognition prior to a Scheme change is defined as a Scheme which is: Recognised by GFSI on the Benchmark criteria V7 but will be making a change to its governance or ownership, or a significant change to its management system, stard or normative documents, which could compromise the Scheme s recognition by GFSI. Scheme Owners will inform the GFSI Executive Director in writing about the significant change. A significant change can lead to additional actions from the Benchmark Leader. The type of action will depend on the impact of the significant change. GFSI will require the applicant Scheme Owner to submit an application for recognition to GFSI together with supporting evidence proving that: there is an agreement with one or more Accreditation Bodies for Certification Bodies to operate to ISO/ IEC ISO17065 or ISO /IEC for the scope of their Scheme. The Accreditation Bodies granting accreditation to the scope of the Scheme shall be members of the International Accreditation Forum (IAF) shall be signatories to the Multilateral Recognition Arrangement (MLA). there are contractual relationships with at least two Certification Bodies, that have accreditation for the scope of the Scheme with an Accreditation Body. the Scheme has in place 10 accredited certificates (for each relevant scope of the application) issued by an accredited Certification Bodies, during a twelve-month period prior to the date of the application. the host Scheme has been operational for a period of 8 The GFSI Benchmarking Requirements
9 2 THE GFSI BENCHMARK METHODOLOGY 2.1 Introduction The benchmarking process is performed by a Benchmark Leader, who has been selected approved by the GFSI Board in order to ascertain whether a Scheme can demonstrate conformity with the requirements of the GFSI Benchmarking Requirements. The Benchmark Leader reports to the GFSI Technical Manager who will supervise all the Benchmark activities communication with the Scheme Owners. All Benchmark Leaders will undergo the same training. In addition to this, there will be harmonisation activities several times a year to maintain alignment of the evaluation approaches adopted by the various Benchmark Leaders. The Benchmark Leader will, under supervision of the GFSI Technical Manager, execute the benchmarking process as described in this document. GFSI will select the Benchmark Leader for the Scheme after signing an impartiality declaration from both the side of the Scheme Owner the Benchmark Leader. A Benchmark Leader may perform the benchmarking activities for a maximum period of 3 years per Scheme. The GFSI Executive Director may reassign the Benchmark Leader at any time, at his or her discretion, if it is deemed necessary to do so. 2.2 The Key Procedural Steps The benchmarking process shall be carried out in accordance with the following key procedural steps: 1. Scheme Owner fills out the Self-Assessment. 2. Preliminary desk review by Benchmark Leader. 3. Call to Go Through Findings. 4. Scheme Owner updates (where applicable) resends the final Self-Assessment. 5. Office Visit. 6. Public stakeholder consultation. 7. GFSI Board final decision communication. 8. Annual assessment based on the GFSI Integrity Programme. GFSI BENCHMARKING - Methodology SELF- ASSESSMENT Scheme Owner fills in the Self-Assessment (SA) Review of SA by Benchmark Leader (BL) under supervision of GFSI Technical Manager (TM) i BL details made available on GFSI website. GFSI appoints BL for Scheme. PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT BL TM inform SO of preliminary results SO updates SA resends it i BL checks SA evidence, identifies need for additional info communicates it to GFSI TM. BL summary report recommendation Office visit carried out by BL GFSI TM i As part of BP GFSI performs an office audit. FINAL ASSESSMENT Public Consultation (PC) i Based on recommendation of BL TM, GFSI Board makes final decision on GFSI recognition. Board Decision Update S0 i Based on the assessment, BL drafts report to be shared during PC with stakeholders. SO COMMUNICATION WITH STAKEHOLDERS The GFSI Benchmarking Requirements 9
10 2.2.1 Step 1: Scheme Owner Fills out the Self- Assessment The objective of the Self-Assessment is to allow the Scheme Owner to demonstrate that the Scheme covers all the requirements listed in the benchmark documents of V7, including Part II Requirements for the Management of Schemes as well as the appropriate sections of GFSI Benchmarking Requirements Part III Scheme Scope Key Elements. GFSI will provide an Excel sheet with the relevant scopes that Scheme Owners may use to rank themselves against the GFSI V7 benchmark criteria. For each criterion, the Scheme Owner must evaluate: is the GFSI criteria covered in their Scheme? What is the justification for it? What is the name of the Scheme s document where the criteria are covered? On which page in what paragraph? Can objective evidence be uploaded to support this claim? Along with the application materials provided to the Scheme Owners, GFSI will also provide a detailed description of what is expected from the Scheme Owners throughout the process Step 2: Preliminary Desk Review of the Self-Assessment After the completed Self-Assessment is received, the Benchmark Leader, under the supervision of the GFSI Technical Manager, will perform a preliminary Desk Review. For each GFSI criterion, the Benchmark Leader will review the corresponding requirements in the Scheme Owner s stard check the reference given by the Scheme Owner on where it is covered. The Benchmark Leader will assess the objective evidence delivered by the Scheme Owner. The Benchmark Leader will take note of any criteria where additional information is needed /or where he or she does not agree with the ranking of the Scheme Owner. These comments will be supported by comprehensive explanations. All these findings are sent back to the Scheme Owner in writing form the basis of the conference call in step Step 3: Call to Go through Findings In a conference call, the Benchmark Leader the GFSI Technical Manager will exchange their findings in detail with the Scheme Owner. This will give the Scheme Owner greater insight into what extra information is needed or what needs to be adjusted. During the conference call the time frame for execution of actions will be agreed Step 4: Scheme owner Updates (where applicable) Resends Final Self-Assessment Within the agreed timeframe, the Scheme Owner will update the Self-Assessment /or send the necessary additional information. In order to limit a possible back-forth exchange of information the Scheme Owner will be required to deliver the requested information /or adjustments to the final Self-Assessment. The final version of the Self-Assessment must be signed off by the Director of the Scheme Owner Step 5: Office Visit The Benchmark Leader the GFSI Technical Manager will organise a visit to the nominated offices of the Scheme Owner. The purpose of the visit is to reconcile any discrepancies identified by the Benchmark Leader during the review of the Scheme Owner Self-Assessment check the implementation of the Scheme Owner Integrity Programme. Following the visits to the Scheme Owner s offices, the Benchmark Leader shall complete the report with the findings. The applicant Scheme Owner should ensure that all resources including expert staff members, documentation records are available to support the visit criteria verification process. The findings of this office visit will be reported the Scheme Owner will have to respond with a corrective action plan. Timelines on when the corrective action plan needs to be received will be agreed with the Scheme Owner will depend on the type of finding Step 6: Public Stakeholder Consultation The spreadsheet with the findings the Benchmark Leader s report will be made available by the GFSI Technical Manager on the GFSI website for stakeholder consultation for a period of four weeks. The Scheme Owner will be given the opportunity to approve the content of the report before it is made available in the public domain. The report will only be put to consultation once agreed by all above parties. Any comments, observations or objections made by stakeholders about the report will be collected by the GFSI Technical Manager shared with the Scheme Owner, who shall address these points. The Benchmark Leader the GFSI Technical Manager will evaluate every response from the Scheme Owner will inform the GFSI Board in the form of a final summary report previously agreed upon with the Scheme Owner Step 7: GFSI Board Final Decision Communication The GFSI Board will come to a decision based on consensus following the recommendation that will be presented by the Benchmark Leader the GFSI Technical Manager. If a vote is necessary, the votes of the majority 10 The GFSI Benchmarking Requirements
11 of a quorum of the GFSI Board shall determine the final decision. Records shall be kept of the numbers of votes for, against abstaining. The GFSI Board decision shall be communicated in writing to the Scheme Owner by the GFSI Executive Director, as soon as practicable after the GFSI Board decision, will be communicated on the GFSI website. The GFSI Technical Manager shall ensure that those stakeholders who submitted comments during the stakeholder consultation receive feedback.in the event of recognition by the GFSI Board, the GFSI Technical Manager shall prepare a news release confirming this decision with the co-operation of the Scheme Owner. The Scheme Owner will be expected to issue a similar news release. The timing of these announcements shall be agreed on by the GFSI Executive Director the Scheme Owner. The GFSI Technical Manager shall publish the confirmation of the Scheme s recognition on the GFSI website (Conformance Statement). In the event that the final decision of the GFSI Board is nonrecognition, the reasons for the Board decision shall be clearly documented the GFSI Technical Manager shall make the Scheme Owner aware of the reasons behind this decision. The Scheme Owner shall have the right of appeal against the GFSI Board decision the appeal shall be undertaken in accordance with the procedures specified in Scheme Owner Agreement Step 8: Annual Assessment Based on GFSI Integrity Programme The Global Food Safety Initiative has the responsibility to create a transparent level playing field for all Scheme Owners undergoing benchmarking against the criteria described in the GFSI Benchmarking Requirements V7. In order to ensure that benchmarked Scheme Owners have implemented all the controls necessary to ensure food safety, GFSI has introduced the Integrity Programme Execution of the Integrity Programme: The execution of the Integrity Programme will be managed by the same independent Benchmark Leader who performed the benchmarking process for V7. The execution will take place under the supervision of the GFSI Technical Manager ensure that the appropriate confidentiality is in place throughout the process Elements Frequency of Execution of Integrity Programme The GFSI Integrity Programme consists of three elements: 1. Rom record review - two times a year 2. Scheme Owner Office Audit - once a year 3. Complaint Investigation - incident driven Content of the Rom Record Review The rom record review is an administrative audit that is based on a sampling exercise. Twice a year, the Benchmark Leader will go on the platform of the Scheme Owner romly select 5 audits performed by CB s. From the selected audits, the Scheme Owner will receive a list with request for objective evidence of files related to these audits. These requests are all related to Part 2 Requirements for the Management of Schemes to the scopes against which the Scheme Owner is benchmarked. For example: Certificate report /or auditor notes Contract with the CB Examination file of the auditor Scope allowance of the auditor Etc. The Benchmark Leader will report back its findings. These findings will be discussed during the office audit Content of the Office Audit The focus of the office audit will be on the execution of the Integrity Programme of the Scheme Owner towards the CB s. Based on two rom selected audits on the day of the office visit, the Benchmark Leader will check the implementation effectiveness of the execution of the Integrity Programme of the Scheme Owner. The check will include: An investigation on the findings of the rom record review (when relevant) All elements of Part 2 Use of the GFSI logo The implementation of the corrective actions plan from previous audit (when relevant) The findings of this office audit will be reported Scheme Owner will have to respond with a corrective action plan. Timelines on when the corrective action plan needs to be received will be agreed with the Scheme Owner, will depend on the type of finding Complaint Investigation In the event of a serious complaint towards a GFSIrecognized Scheme, the GFSI Technical Manager has the right to investigate the complaint. This can be done by a desktop investigation or an office visit. The GFSI Technical Manager is responsible for the investigation of any complaints or suspected non-conformity in relation to the compliance of a GFSI-recognised Scheme with the requirements specified within the GFSI Benchmarking Requirements. The GFSI Benchmarking Requirements 11
12 In the event that a complaint or report is received by the GFSI Technical Manager regarding the non-conformity of a Scheme with the GFSI Benchmarking Requirements, the Technical Manager will promptly acknowledge, in writing, the receipt of the complaint or report to the party concerned. When a complaint is received, the GFSI Technical Manager will initiate investigative procedures to verify the accuracy of the complaint. The Technical Manager shall ensure that the details of the complaint are clearly understood documented, that any claims or comments made by the complainant are properly authenticated appropriately documented. This authentication shall be verified as being accurate correct by independent sources, in addition to the complainant. It is the responsibility of the complainant to provide information that can be appropriately authenticated. It is at the discretion of the GFSI Technical Manager to appoint the Benchmark Leader or an independent assessor at any stage during the investigation process. The GFSI Technical Manager must ensure impartiality preserve confidentiality. If the Benchmark Leader or an assessor is appointed, he or she shall carry out a thorough investigation of the complaint, where possible, provide a resolution for the issues, fully document the complaint process, provide a detailed report to the GFSI Executive Director Sanctioning Activities of the GFSI Integrity Programme may lead to sanctions for the Scheme Owner. In the event that evidence of nonconformity against the requirements specified in the GFSI Benchmarking Requirements is found by a Benchmark Leader during the annual assessment, the GFSI Executive Director shall promptly contact the Scheme Owner concerned. The GFSI Technical Manager shall fully document the process of investigation decision-making. The GFSI Technical Manager shall make a decision after the review of the submitted evidence will either: 1. take no action against the Scheme Owner, or 2. convene a meeting of GFSI Board members to gain agreement on one of three possible outcomes - continued recognition, suspension of recognition, or the withdrawal of recognition. Irrespective of the decision taken by the GFSI Executive Director, the Scheme Owner the GFSI Board members shall be informed in writing of the decision, this will include a full explanation for the actions taken. GFSI SUSPENSION OF RECOGNITION PROCEDURE If, following the review of the evidence gathered submitted by the GFSI Technical Manager consultation with the Scheme Owner, the GFSI Board considers that a period of suspension of recognition shall be imposed, the Scheme Owner shall be informed of this decision, any remediation conditions imposed by the GFSI Board to regain recognition status. The period of suspension of recognition expected outcomes shall be made known to the Scheme Owner. The Scheme Owner shall confirm to the GFSI Board that these remediation conditions can be achieved within the timescales set out by the GFSI Board, when evidence of the results of the corrective action can be expected, continued conformity to the requirements of the GFSI Benchmarking Requirements can be established. If the GFSI Board is not satisfied with the commitment of the Scheme under suspension to take the appropriate corrective action, they shall withdraw recognition. In the event that a period of suspension is imposed, the GFSI website shall clearly specify the details conditions of the suspension GFSI Withdrawal of Recognition Procedure If, following the review of the evidence gathered submitted by the GFSI Executive Director consultation with the Scheme Owner, the GFSI Board considers that a withdrawal of recognition is required, the Scheme Owner shall be informed of this decision. In the event that GFSI recognition is withdrawn, GFSI shall issue a news release the GFSI website shall clearly specify the details conditions of the withdrawal. A Scheme Owner may choose to voluntarily withdraw from GFSI recognition when unforeseen circumstances put the Scheme into contravention of GFSI requirements. In this instance, the Scheme Owner will make a request to withdraw voluntarily, a full dossier of the circumstances at the disposal of the GFSI Executive Director. The GFSI Executive Director will inform the GFSI Board regarding the circumstances convene a meeting to discuss the issue as soon as possible. It is at the discretion of the GFSI Board to grant voluntary withdrawal or to launch the suspension process GFSI Appeals Procedure - GFSI Recognition The Scheme Owner has the right to appeal against any decision made by the GFSI Board, the GFSI Executive Director or any person contracted to the GFSI in relation 12 The GFSI Benchmarking Requirements
13 to the benchmarking process, associated systems procedures. Only the Scheme Owner to which the decision relates to has the right to appeal to the GFSI Board. The Scheme Owner shall submit an appeal to the GFSI Executive Director within 30 days of the matter in dispute occurring. The appeal shall be submitted in writing to the GFSI Executive Director, shall clearly describe the reason provide a full explanation together with substantive evidence to support the thorough investigation of the appeal. When the appeal procedure is initiated, the status of the Scheme shall be amended on the GFSI website to reflect that the Scheme is subject to an appeal. Any appeal shall be heard by a Committee (the Appeals Committee), which is a body specifically assembled by the GFSI Board for the purposes of hearing an individual appeal. The GFSI Board shall ensure that such an Appeals Committee should not include any person or GFSI staff member involved with the decision that is being appealed. The Appeals Committee shall be assembled from members of the GFSI Board shall consist of a minimum of three members of the Board. The GFSI shall ensure that the investigation is conducted in an impartial professional manner, without any actual or perceived conflict of interest. The final outcome of the investigation by the Appeals Committee shall be heard by the GFSI Board, the decision made by the Appeals Committee shall be upheld by the GFSI Board. The decision submitted to the GFSI Board by the Appeals Committee shall be conveyed to the Scheme Owner that has raised the appeal. The decision of the Appeals Committee shall be final the appeal process will then be closed. The GFSI Benchmarking Requirements 13
Contact address: Global Food Safety Initiative Foundation c/o The Consumer Goods Forum 22/24 rue du Gouverneur Général Eboué Issy-les-Moulineaux
Contact address: Global Food Safety Initiative Foundation c/o The Consumer Goods Forum 22/24 rue du Gouverneur Général Eboué 92130 Issy-les-Moulineaux France Secretariat email: gfsinfo@theconsumergoodsforum.com
More informationAnimal Products (Dairy) Conditions for Recognition. June Final
Conditions for Recognition June 2005 Table of Contents 1 Scope...2 2 Outcome...3 3 Issuing and Availability of Conditions...4 4 Conditions for Recognition...5 5 Duties For Recognised Agencies...6 6 Part
More informationANNEX IV REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 2.2 RULES OF ORIGIN
ANNEX IV REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 2.2 RULES OF ORIGIN ANNEX IV REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 2.2 RULES OF ORIGIN TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I Article 1 Article 2 Article 3 Article 4 Article 5 Article 6 Article 7
More informationRULES FOR THE LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION ASSURANCE PROGRAM (LPA)
V 1.16 RULES FOR THE LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION ASSURANCE PROGRAM (LPA) 2017 National Livestock Identification System Limited Copyright protects this publication. Except for purposes by the Copyright Act, reproduction
More informationRULES FOR THE LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION ASSURANCE PROGRAM (LPA)
V 1.18 RULES FOR THE LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION ASSURANCE PROGRAM (LPA) 2017 Integrity Systems Company Limited Copyright protects this publication. Except for purposes by the Copyright Act, reproduction by whatever
More informationLOW VOLTAGE AGREEMENT GROUP (LOVAG) AGREEMENT
LOW VOLTAGE AGREEMENT GROUP (LOVAG) AGREEMENT October 2013 LOVAG M-1 ISSUE 8 LOW VOLTAGE AGREEMENT GROUP (LOVAG) AGREEMENT CONTENTS REFERENCE SECTION ISSUE DATE LOVAG M-1 Low Voltage Agreement Group 8
More informationEA-0/09: Procedure. For. Internal Audits. Publication Reference PURPOSE. This procedure describes the process for EA internal audits.
Publication Reference EA-0/09: 2015 Procedure For Internal Audits PURPOSE This procedure describes the process for EA internal audits. October 2015_rev01 1 of 9 Authorship This document has been written
More informationCEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations - Part 4: Internal Regulations Part 4. Certification
Internal Regulations Part 4 Certification July 2018 European Committee for Standardization Tel: +32 2 550 08 11 European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization Tel: +32 2 550 08 11 Rue de la Science
More informationThe DCA Certification Scheme: Guidelines for DATA CENTRES
The DCA Certification Scheme: Guidelines for DATA CENTRES 2015, Data Centre Alliance Limited (www.datacentrealliance.org). All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced in Whole or in part;
More informationILM Enquiries and Appeals Policy. V2 November 2017
ILM Enquiries and Appeals Policy V2 November 2017 Contents Document Change History 2 Scope 3 Definition 4 How to lodge an enquiry 7 Appeal 10 Independent Appeals Board 13 Policy for Centre or Provider
More informationAnnex to II.6 MANDATORY PROVIDENT FUND SCHEMES ORDINANCE (CAP. 485) INTERNAL CONTROLS OF REGISTERED SCHEMES
MANDATORY PROVIDENT FUND SCHEMES ORDINANCE (CAP. 485) INTERNAL CONTROLS OF REGISTERED SCHEMES Version 2 July 2010 INTERNAL CONTROLS OF REGISTERED SCHEMES CONTENTS Page 1. Introduction 1 2. Reporting Requirements
More informationTHE EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY CUSTOMS UNION (RULES OF ORIGIN) RULES ANNEX III
THE EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY CUSTOMS UNION (RULES OF ORIGIN) RULES ANNEX III THE EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY CUSTOMS UNION (RULES OF ORIGIN) RULES TABLE OF CONTENTS RULE TITLE 1 Citation 2 Purpose of the Rules
More information1.0 Scope. 2.0 Program Participation Application
Page 1 of 16 1.0 Scope Registration is open to all interested organizations. This procedure describes the events, which occur during the registration process. The purpose of the registration process is
More informationACCREDITATION OF BEE VERIFICATION AGENCIES
ACCREDITATION OF BEE VERIFICATION AGENCIES Approved By: Chief Executive Officer: Ron Josias Senior Manager: Christinah Leballo Date of Approval: 2013-02-28 Date of Implementation: 2013-02-28 SANAS Page
More informationBy repealing the meanings designated for the terms "identical goods" and "similar goods" and replacing them with the following:
Law No. ( ) For The Year 1999 A Law Amending the Customs Law Article (1): This Law shall be named (The Law Amending the Customs Law for the year 1999) and shall be read in conjunction with the Law No.
More informationNo. 10 Caribbean Community (CARICOM) Dominican Republic Free Trade
No. 10 Caribbean Community (CARICOM) Dominican 2001 131 (vi) the customs regimes and procedures; (vii) the current domestic legislation relating to import taxes, customs and port charges, and any subsequent
More informationTreatment Programme. Overview and General Requirements for the Supply of Official Treatments. 15 November 2018
Treatment Requirement Treatment Programme Overview and General Requirements for the Supply of Official Treatments Issued by the Ministry for Primary Industries TITLE Treatment Requirement: Treatment Programme
More informationSpecialist Accreditation Program
Specialist Accreditation Program SMSF Specialist Auditor - Rules and Conditions 11 September 2015 Version 1.1 dated 11 September 2015 Table of Contents Section 1: Why Become a SMSF Association Accredited
More informationUL s Medical Quality Management System Registration. Program Requirements
UL s Medical Quality Management System Registration Program Requirements 00-MB-C0032 8.0 7.0 Revised: 2012/06/07 2011/6/09 At of the date of issuance of this document, UL LLC. is accredited by the following
More information(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS
12.7.2012 Official Journal of the European Union L 181/1 II (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 600/2012 of 21 June 2012 on the verification of greenhouse gas emission reports
More informationAUS-MEAT Animal Welfare Certification Program Rules for Livestock Processing Establishments
AUS-MEAT Animal Welfare Certification Program Rules for Livestock Processing Establishments 2 nd Edition: August 2018 2018 AUS-MEAT Limited Copyright protects this publication. Except for purposes by the
More information46th CIML Meeting DRAFT BASIC PUBLICATION. Draft 2. 46th CIML Meeting. Prague 2011 ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION
DRAFT Draft 2 Draft 2 - Revision of OIML B 10 SUBMITTED FOR CIML APPROVAL BASIC PUBLICATION Revision of B 10 Framework for a Mutual Acceptance Arrangement on OIML Type Evaluations 46th CIML Meeting Prague
More informationINTERNAL REGULATIONS PART 4 CERTIFICATION (Aussi disponible en français) (Auch in deutscher Fassung erhältlich)
INTERNAL REGULATIONS PART 4 CERTIFICATION (Aussi disponible en français) (Auch in deutscher Fassung erhältlich) 2014-01 CEN-CENELEC Foreword These CEN-CENELEC Internal Regulations Part 4 are divided in
More informationArticle 26 Co-operation in the Field of Automotive Industry
Article 26 Co-operation in the Field of Automotive Industry The Countries shall co-operate, with the participation of their respective automotive industries, to further enhance competitiveness of the automotive
More informationON METROLOGY. Based on Article 65 (1) of the Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo, LAW ON METROLOGY CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS.
LAW No. 06/L-037 ON METROLOGY The Assembly of the Republic of Kosovo, Based on Article 65 (1) of the Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo, Approves: LAW ON METROLOGY CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS Article
More informationVERIFICATION 2005 STATEMENT OF POLICY
VERIFICATION 2005 STATEMENT OF POLICY This statement specifies the policy NZFSA will apply in regard to the performing of verification under the Animal Products Act for animal materials and products other
More informationApplicant s informative form Terms and Conditions for conformity assessment and Certification services.
HELLENIC ELECTRONICS EQUIPMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE CENTRE/HEEQAC S.A. 103, KEFALLINIAS STR., 112 51 ATHENS GREECE TEL.: +302108670588 FAX: +302108647510 e-mail: info@heeqac.gr - Url: www.heeqac.gr QUALITY
More informationAppendix A Definitions for Part 1 of LPS 1233 scheme document. An * after a term means that a definition for that term can be found in Appendix A.
Page 1 of 13 CONTENTS 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Scope 1.3 Recognition/Approval process for companies wishing to join the LPS 1233 scheme 1.4 Recognition/Approval certificates 1.5 Continuation of recognition/approval
More informationICE BENCHMARK ADMINISTRATION CONSULTATION AND FEEDBACK REQUEST: LIBOR CODE OF CONDUCT ICE Benchmark Administration Limited (IBA) is responsible for the end-to-end administration of four systemically important
More informationAPPLICATION FOR THIRD PARTY CERTIFICATION BODY ACCREDITATION UNDER THE FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION (FDA) FOOD SAFETY MODERNIZATION ACT (FSMA)
APPLICATION FOR THIRD PARTY CERTIFICATION BODY ACCREDITATION UNDER THE FOOD For IAS Accredited Organizations, please list Accreditation No.: New accreditation For new accreditation request, a copy of the
More informationGSTC-ACCREDITED MANUAL
GSTC-ACCREDITED MANUAL Version 2.2 29 February 2016 The Global Sustainable Tourism Council, 2015, All Rights Reserved The Global Sustainable Tourism Council www.gstcouncil.org To make comments on this
More informationUL s Medical Quality Management System Registration
UL s Medical Quality Management System Registration Program Requirements 00-MB-C0032 12.0 7.0 Revised: 2011/6/09 At of the date of issuance of this document, UL LLC. is accredited by the following Accreditation
More informationSCHEME RULES Effective from February Trade Assurance Scheme for Combinable Crops
SCHEME RULES Effective from February 2016 Trade Assurance Scheme for Combinable Crops 2 Trade Assurance Scheme for Combinable Crops Scheme Rules effective from February 1st 2016 FROM FARM GATE TASCC HAULAGE
More informationRAILTRACK THE RAILWAY GROUP STANDARDS CODE
RAILTRACK THE RAILWAY GROUP STANDARDS CODE June 1998 Explanatory Introduction Railtrack, by virtue of the 1993 Railways Act, its control of the network and the law relating to health and safety, has a
More informationIncentive Guidelines Investment Aid for Energy Efficiency Projects
Incentive Guidelines Investment Aid for Energy Efficiency Projects Issue Date: 18 th May 2018 Version: 1 http://support.maltaenterprise.com Malta Enterprise provides support to interested applicants to
More informationIAF Mandatory Document. Control of Entities Operating on Behalf of Accredited Management Systems Certification Bodies
IAF Mandatory Document Control of Entities Operating on Behalf of Accredited Management Systems Certification Bodies Issue 1 (IAF MD 23:2018) Issue 1 Control of Entities Operating on Behalf of Page 2 of
More informationCompany Accreditation
Company Accreditation HANDBOOK VERSION 2.0 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. NABCEP COMPANY ACCREDITATION POLICY 2 I. POLICY PURPOSE 2 II. POLICY SCOPE 2 III. COMPANY ACCREDITATION REQUIREMENTS 2
More informationCHAPTER 3 RULES OF ORIGIN
CHAPTER 3 RULES OF ORIGIN ARTICLE 3.1: DEFINITIONS For the purposes of this Chapter: aquaculture means the farming of aquatic organisms, including fish, molluscs, crustaceans, other aquatic invertebrates
More informationQuébec Reliability Standards Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Program (QCMEP) October 10, Effective date: To be set by the Régie
Québec Reliability Standards Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Program (QCMEP) October 0, 0 Effective date: To be set by the Régie TABLE OF CONTENTS. INTRODUCTION.... DEFINITIONS.... REGISTER OF ENTITIES
More informationGRATA LAW FIRM (MOSCOW)
GRATA LAW FIRM (MOSCOW) AUGUST 2014 BAN ON IMPORT OF CERTAIN PRODUCTS TO THE RUSSIA: DETERMINATION OF THE COUNTRY OF ORIGIN 1. Measures to be Taken by the Russian Customs Authorities The Decree of the
More informationSedex Membership Rules
Term Meaning A (Purchaser) Member means any Member designated as such by the Board in accordance with these Rules; AB (Supplier and Purchaser) Member means any Member designated as such by the Board in
More informationPlant Export Requirement
Plant Export Requirement MPI Certification Standard: IVA Requirements 30 March 2015 Plant export requirements issued by the Ministry for Primary Industries Contents Page Introduction 3 Part 1: MPI Authorisation
More informationAssure Certification Ltd. Scheme
Assure Self-Certification Scheme Scheme Rules Terms and Conditions This document provides the scheme rules for the Assure dwellings and non-dwelling Self- Certification Scheme and encompasses the Assure
More informationTHE LIST OF ITEMS WHERE PREFERNTIAL TARIFF IS GRANTED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF AFGHANISTAN PRODUCT DESCRIPTION MFN DUTY %
ANNEXURE - A THE LIST OF ITEMS WHERE PREFERNTIAL TARIFF IS GRANTED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF AFGHANISTAN S.NO. HS CODE PRODUCT DESCRIPTION MFN DUTY % 1 090230 Black Tea (fermented) Temporary Exempted 100 2
More informationFactsheet N 6 Project implementation: delivering project outputs, achieving project objectives and bringing about the desired change
Project implementation: delivering project outputs, achieving project objectives and bringing about the desired change Version No 13 of 23 November 2018 Table of contents I. GETTING STARTED: THE INITIATION
More informationQuality Assurance Scheme for Organisations
Quality Assurance Scheme for Organisations New policy proposals by the Professional Regulation Executive Committee Exposure Draft ED 30 Consultation paper May 2013 Contents 1. Introduction and background
More informationLEADER ICT System User Guide Project Claim
LEADER ICT System Guide Project Claim Glossary Abbreviation CRM CRO DRCD EFT EOI LCDC LDC LDS LFP Promoter RDP TCAN TRN Definition Customer Relationship Management Companies Registration Office Department
More informationProcess and methods Published: 18 February 2014 nice.org.uk/process/pmg18
Guide to the technology appraisal aisal and highly specialised technologies appeal process Process and methods Published: 18 February 2014 nice.org.uk/process/pmg18 NICE 2014. All rights reserved. Contents
More informationthe considerable financial and reputation risk run by organizations if they are discovered to be involved
Att.: To all accredited Certification Bodies Our ref.: DC2017SSV006 Milan, 16/01/2017 Subject: ACCREDIA Department of Certification and Inspection - Circular N 33/2016 Informative communication regarding
More informationSUBMISSION TO PRIMARY PRODUCTION SELECT COMMITTEE FISHERIES (FOREIGN CHARTER VESSELS AND OTHER MATTERS) AMENDMENT BILL
28 March 2013 SUBMISSION TO PRIMARY PRODUCTION SELECT COMMITTEE FISHERIES (FOREIGN CHARTER VESSELS AND OTHER MATTERS) AMENDMENT BILL FISHERIES INSHORE NEW ZEALAND SUBMISSION Introduction 1. Fisheries Inshore
More informationSantia Special Conditions (Accreditation Only)
Santia Special Conditions (Accreditation Only) Version 6 Oct 14 1 0. Content 1. Overview 2. Registration 3. Questionnaire 4. The Assessment 5. Assessment Standards 6. Accreditation / Approval 7. Safety
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Union REGULATIONS
16.5.2014 L 145/5 REGULATIONS COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) No 499/2014 of 11 March 2014 supplementing Regulations (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation
More informationFINANCIAL ADVISORY AND INTERMEDIARY SERVICES
FINANCIAL ADVISORY AND INTERMEDIARY SERVICES About The Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services (FAIS) Division was responsible for the administration of the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services
More informationU.S. Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service Administrative Review Alexandria, VA 22302
U.S. Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service Administrative Review Alexandria, VA 22302 Chula Vista Ice Cream, Appellant, v. Case Number: C0168218 Retailer Operations Division, Respondent.
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Union. (Acts whose publication is not obligatory) COMMISSION
L 67/18 II (Acts whose publication is not obligatory) COMMISSION COMMISSION DECISION of 3 February 2004 on the implementation of the Preparatory Action on the Enhancement of the European industrial potential
More informatione.com-cert Ltd. General business conditions and certification rules
Area of validity Current regulation details the general business and certification conditions of e.com-cert Ltd. which is deemed obligatory to itself, and handled as contractual agreement towards its partners.
More informationProcurement Federal Programs
626. ATTACHMENT Procurement Federal Programs This document is intended to integrate standard district purchasing procedures with additional requirements applicable to procurements that are subject to the
More informationFINAL AGENCY DECISION
U.S. Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service Administrative Review Branch Alexandria, VA 22302 Airport Party Store, Appellant, v. Case C0198700 Retailer Operations Division, Respondent. 1
More informationData Processing Agreement
Data Processing Agreement This Data Processing Agreement with EU Standard Contractual Clauses (Processors), (the DPA ) supplements the Dropbox Business Agreement between Dropbox, Inc. and Dropbox International
More informationProcurement Federal Programs
626. ATTACHMENT Procurement Federal Programs This document is intended to integrate standard district purchasing procedures with additional requirements applicable to procurements that are subject to the
More informationU.S. Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service Administrative Review Alexandria, VA FINAL AGENCY DECISION ISSUE AUTHORITY
U.S. Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service Administrative Review Alexandria, VA 22302 Frank Fuels, Inc, Appellant, v. Case Number: C0201678 Retailer Operations Division, Respondent. FINAL
More informationLFA Spot Checks of ACT Co-payment Mechanism First-Line Buyers: Terms of Reference
August 2014 LFA Spot Checks of ACT Co-payment Mechanism First-Line Buyers: Terms of Reference Background and Rationale The Private Sector Co-payment Mechanism for ACTs ( Co-payment Mechanism ) is a financing
More information2 INTRODUCTION GENERAL OBLIGATIONS Principal, Partner or Director responsibilities Breaching the Rules...
SCHEME RULES April 2019 1 1 Contents 2 INTRODUCTION... 4 3 GENERAL OBLIGATIONS... 4 3.1 Principal, Partner or Director responsibilities... 4 3.2 Breaching the Rules... 5 4 CLIENT MONEY... 5 4.1 Client
More informationWorkSafe Connect. Student Handbook 1 June 2017
WorkSafe Connect Student Handbook 1 June 2017 Contents Terms & Conditions... 3 Academic Ethical Behaviour... 5 Access, Equity and Diversity... 6 Appeals... 7 Assessment Criteria... 8 Cancellation and Refund...
More informationEnquiries and Appeals for Qualifications The process and how to apply
Enquiries and Appeals for Qualifications The process and how to apply Version 3.2 May 2018 Document change history Changes to specific sections of the document are listed below: Stage 1 - Enquiries Page
More informationThe Institute of Professional Will Writers. Desktop Audit. 15 th May 2017
The Institute of Professional Will Writers Desktop Audit 15 th May 2017 Background information The Institute of Professional Willwriters (the Institute) was formed in 1991 as a self-regulated body to safeguard
More informationEA Policy For Conformity Assessment Schemes
Publication Reference EA-02/11 EA Policy For Conformity Assessment Schemes (Sector schemes) PURPOSE EA recognises that the market sometimes requires accreditation of Conformity Assessment Bodies (CABs)
More informationU.S. Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service Administrative Review Alexandria, VA 22302
U.S. Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service Administrative Review Alexandria, VA 22302 John C s Fish Market, Appellant, v. Case Number: C0195512 Retailer Operations Division, Respondent.
More informationThe problems occur when products arrive that haven t been tested in accredited labs so we have no idea about the validity of the test results that
Hope your 2016 is off to a great start. In this issue of IANZ Argus, we take a look at the Trans Pacific Partnership, the recent issue of the quality of steel imports, a visit to IANZ by the Minister of
More informationComplaint and Appeal Process
Revision 04 (May/2017) Complaint and Appeal Process Internal distribution only Page 1 of 5 Contents Revision History... 3 Related Documents... 3 1 Introduction... 4 2 Scope... 4 3 Process........ 4 3.1
More informationAMENITY ASSURED STANDARD
THE AMENITY ASSURED STANDARD for Integrated Approaches to Professional Weed, Pest and Disease Control in the Amenity Sector AMENITY ASSURED STANDARD The Amenity Assured Standard sets a benchmark of best
More informationANNEX 3 RULES OF ORIGIN
ANNEX 3 RULES OF ORIGIN In determining the origin of a good eligible for preferential tariff treatment pursuant to Article 5 of this Agreement, the following Rules shall apply: For the purposes of this
More informationU.S. Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service Administrative Review Alexandria, VA 22302
U.S. Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service Administrative Review Alexandria, VA 22302 M&M One Stop Seafood, Appellant, v. Case Number: C0194331 Retailer Operations Division, Respondent.
More information(e) the term customs value of goods means the value of goods for the purposes of levying ad valorem customs duties on imported goods;
(e) the term customs value of goods means the value of goods for the purposes of levying ad valorem customs duties on imported goods; (f) the term domestic industry means the producers as a whole of the
More informationStaffordshire Pension Fund Administration Strategy
Staffordshire Pension Fund Administration Strategy Issue Date 1 December 2016 Review Date 1 December 2017 Version 1.0 1 2 Staffordshire County Council Pension Administration Strategy Introduction This
More informationModern Apprenticeship Programme Specification Published 29 March 2019
Modern Apprenticeship Programme Specification 2019-2020 Published 29 March 2019 Contents Introduction Part One 1 Eligibility Criteria for Modern Apprenticeship Funding 2 Programme Entry 2.1 Initial Assessment
More informationFOOD STANDARDS AGENCY CONSULTATION Title: The Food Law Code of Practice Review
www.food.gov.uk FOOD STANDARDS AGENCY CONSULTATION Title: The Food Law Code of Practice Review Date consultation launched: CONSULTATION SUMMARY PAGE Closing date for responses: 25 June 2013 17 September
More informationMRA for Equivalence of Technical Requirements
2009/TEL39/LSG/MRATF/006rev4 Agenda Item: 5.1. MRA for Equivalence of Technical Requirements Purpose: Information Submitted by: MRATF Chair Mutual Recognition Arrangement Task Force Meeting Singapore 13
More informationFor the purpose of this article only, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings, and are hereby defined, as follows:
1 of 7 2/7/2011 2:01 PM 18-2-1: PUBLIC POLICY STATEMENT: 18-2-2: DEFINITIONS: 18-2-3: MARKET MANAGER; APPOINTMENT, RESPONSIBILITY: 18-2-4: LOCATION OF MARKET: 18-2-5: SPACE RENTAL FEE: 18-2-6: APPLICATION:
More informationDOCUMENT PACKAGE FOR PARMELEE FARM ARTISAN MARKET. SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, am 3pm
DOCUMENT PACKAGE FOR PARMELEE FARM ARTISAN MARKET SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 2019 10am 3pm To apply for a space please submit your application by August 1, 2019 CONTENTS OF THIS PACKAGE Guidelines & Rules
More informationSub- Contracting Strategy
010416 Sub- Contracting Strategy Issue Date: 1 st August 2016 Approved: Jason Pepper Signed: To be reviewed: 31 st July 2017 Strategy Lead: Executive Director of Finance & Resources The Sheffield College
More informationFAIR FOR LIFE & FOR LIFE. Procedure for Scheme Revision
FAIR FOR LIFE & FOR LIFE Procedure for Scheme Revision Version February 2017 Prologue to this version: In March 2016, the Fair for Life Standard began the process of a particularly important revision:
More informationThe Bailiwick of Guernsey Statement of Professional Standing (SPS) CISI Terms and Conditions
The Bailiwick of Guernsey Statement of Professional Standing (SPS) CISI Terms and Conditions Applications for the Bailiwick of Guernsey Statement of Professional Standing (SPS) will only be accepted from
More informationA VOLUNTARY CODE OF PRACTICE FOR HOSPITAL PURCHASER/PROVIDER AGREEMENT NEGOTIATIONS BETWEEN PRIVATE HOSPITALS AND PRIVATE HEALTH INSURERS
A VOLUNTARY CODE OF PRACTICE FOR HOSPITAL PURCHASER/PROVIDER AGREEMENT NEGOTIATIONS BETWEEN PRIVATE HOSPITALS AND PRIVATE HEALTH INSURERS Statement from the Minister for Health and Aged Care I am pleased
More informationU.S. Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service Administrative Review Alexandria, VA 22302
U.S. Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service Administrative Review Alexandria, VA 22302 Shopper Stop, Appellant, v. Case Number: C0192579 Retailer Operations Division, Respondent. FINAL AGENCY
More informationTRADE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ZIMBABWE AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA
TRADE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ZIMBABWE AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA The Government of the Republic of Zimbabwe and the Government of the Republic of Namibia,
More informationU.S. Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service Administrative Review Alexandria, VA FINAL AGENCY DECISION
U.S. Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service Administrative Review Alexandria, VA 22302 S & S Meat And Seafood, Appellant, v. Case Number: C0194441 Retailer Operations Division, Respondent.
More informationCODEX COMMITTEE ON FOOD LABELLING (Forty-third Session) Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 9-13 May European Union Comments on CL 2014/30-FL:
CODEX COMMITTEE ON FOOD LABELLING (Forty-third Session) Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 9-13 May 2016 European Union Comments on CL 2014/30-FL: 01 October 2015 Date Marking (Proposed Draft Revision of the General
More informationNagement. Revenue Scotland. Risk Management Framework. Revised [ ]February Table of Contents Nagement... 0
Nagement Revenue Scotland Risk Management Framework Revised [ ]February 2016 Table of Contents Nagement... 0 1. Introduction... 2 1.2 Overview of risk management... 2 2. Policy Statement... 3 3. Risk Management
More informationU.S. Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service Administrative Review Branch Alexandria, VA FINAL AGENCY DECISION ISSUE AUTHORITY
U.S. Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service Administrative Review Branch Alexandria, VA 22302 Goins Gas & Produce, Appellant, v. Case Number: C0200973 Retailer Operations Division, Respondent.
More informationU.S. Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service Administrative Review Branch Alexandria, VA FINAL AGENCY DECISION ISSUE
U.S. Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service Administrative Review Branch Alexandria, VA 22302 Jai Mini Mart / ARCO AM PM #81774, Appellant, v. Case Number: C0198097 Retailer Operations Division,
More informationRegistration and Issuance Process
Registration and Issuance Process VCS Version 3 Procedural Document 21 June 2017, v3.8 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION... 4 2 OPENING A VCS REGISTRY ACCOUNT... 5 3 PIPELINE LISTING PROCESS... 6 3.1 Process...
More informationThis document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents
2008R1235 EN 06.11.2015 017.001 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents B COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1235/2008 of 8
More informationVehicle Builders and Repairers Association-Audit September 2014
Vehicle Builders and Repairers Association-Audit September 2014 Background information The Vehicle Builders and Repairers Association (VBRA) started in 1913, when the trade association represented vehicle
More informationGovernment Industry Agreement for Biosecurity Readiness and Response. Deed
Government Industry Agreement for Biosecurity Readiness and Response Deed Version 2.0 December 2016 This version 2.0 of the Government Industry Agreement for Biosecurity Readiness and Response Deed is
More informationGUIDELINES ON COMPLIANCE FUNCTION FOR FUND MANAGEMENT COMPANIES
GUIDELINES ON COMPLIANCE FUNCTION FOR FUND MANAGEMENT COMPANIES SC-GL/CGL-2005 (R2-2018) 1 st Issued : 15 March 2005 Revised : 5 January 2018 1 Page List of Revision Revision Revision Date Effective Date
More informationCTSI Requirements and Guidance on seeking approval as a Consumer ADR Body operating in non regulated sectors.
CTSI Requirements and Guidance on seeking approval as a Consumer ADR Body operating in non regulated sectors. For the purpose of The Alternative Dispute Resolution for Consumer Disputes (Competent Authorities
More informationTHE GAME FAIR 2018 Diamond Anniversary, RAGLEY HALL Exhibitors Insurance and Safety Information
THE GAME FAIR 2018 Diamond Anniversary, RAGLEY HALL Exhibitors Insurance and Safety Information All Game Fair exhibitors must provide information on their insurance and safety arrangements, as indicated
More informationAndersonville Farmers Market 2016 New Vendor Application Checklist
Andersonville Farmers Market 2016 New Vendor Application Checklist Your application WILL NOT be processed until the following items are received: ALL VENDORS: $25 Non-refundable application fee (checks
More informationFINANCIAL REGULATION
FINANCIAL REGULATION The present Financial Regulation shall enter into force on the 1 st of January 2014 Adopted in Parma on 19 December 2013 For EFSA s Management Board [SIGNED] Sue Davies Chair of the
More information