Fitch Affirms JFK IAT (NY) Project Bonds at 'BBB+'; Outlook Stable

Transcription

1 Fitch Affirms JFK IAT (NY) Project Bonds at 'BBB+'; Outlook Stable Fitch Ratings-New York-18 October 2017: Fitch Ratings has affirmed the rating on the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey JFK International Air Terminal's (IAT or Terminal 4) approximately $1.3 billion outstanding parity special project bonds series 6 and series 8 at 'BBB+'. The Rating Outlook is Stable. KEY RATING DRIVERS The 'BBB+' rating reflects the strong performance of the terminal following the completion of its Phase II expansion project, which added 11 regional jet gates and relocated domestic activity for Delta Airlines' (Delta; 'BBB-'/Stable Outlook) to Terminal 4. Traffic increases have bolstered IAT's position, leaving the terminal with a strong debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) of 2.3x in fiscal year 2016 (FY16) and more rapid deleveraging compared to original expectations. Cost per enplanement levels remain slightly higher than peer terminals, however, capacity constraints and the resulting economic value to airlines serving the region mitigate this concern. The rating reflects IAT's strategic significance to foreign-flag carriers and to Delta as the hub for its operations in the New York area. IAT's long-term airline agreement with Delta is contracted through the rated debt's maturity and provides IAT with adequate cost and debt service recovery terms. Despite the significant investment Delta has made into the terminal, the single asset nature of IAT as well as its heavy reliance on one dominant carrier present material credit risks that keep the credit in the 'BBB' category. IAT also faces on-going competition for domestic and international traffic from other terminals at JFK, Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR), and LaGuardia (LGA) airports. Strong Market despite Competition - Revenue Risk (Volume): Midrange

2 The NYC region remains one of the most affluent and historically, culturally and economically important regions in the U.S. and, as such, the terminal benefits from an exceptionally strong catchment area, for both international and domestic services. Nevertheless, IAT faces a high degree of competition, not only from other independently operated JFK international terminals, but also from EWR and LGA. The effect of competition is partly mitigated by limited capacity in the market, particularly during peak travel periods. The terminal experienced significant passenger growth in 2016, up 6% from 2015, following completion of the Phase II expansion project, as Delta shifted its domestic service to Terminal 4. Reasonable Pricing Power - Revenue Risk (Price): Midrange IAT has complete flexibility to enter into agreements with airlines and set rates as it sees fit. IAT's agreement with Delta essentially functions as a blend of cost recovery methodology and a traditional lease, and agreements with contract carriers reflect negotiated pricing based on market conditions. IAT's pricing power benefits from Terminal 4 being the only facility at JFK with a 24 hour federal inspection service (FIS) facility making it desirable for international traffic. Average airline cost per enplanement (CPE) is comparatively high, and has remained in the $36-$42 range since 2013; however, this should be viewed in the context of high ticket prices for international travel and limited cheaper options for airlines wishing to serve a very competitive region. Limited Future Capital Needs - Infrastructure Development & Renewal: Stronger The Phase II expansion project was completed in the first quarter of Following completion of the Phase II expansion project, terminal facilities have been modernized and improved and are not expected to require major renewal in the foreseeable future. Uncertainty remains surrounding the possibility of the Phase III expansion project which will add capacity for growing Delta operations, but also could add additional leverage to the current debt profile. Well-Structured Debt Protects Noteholders - Debt Structure: Stronger All of IAT's debt is fixed rate and fully amortizing, maturing prior to the expiration of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey's (PANYNJ)

3 lease with the City of New York, and Delta's tenant agreement with the terminal. Debt covenants remain standard, with reserves cash funded at their required amounts. Financial Profile The 2010 issuance of series 8 to fund its Phase I expansion project doubled IAT's outstanding senior debt quantum, and the increased leverage amplified the effect of possible construction risks on IAT's credit profile. Following the completion of Phase II, leverage declined to a Fitch calculated approximately 4.2x in 2016 down from 4.8x in 2015, and is expected to continue to decrease to the 3x-4x range by IAT is expected to be able to maintain a debt service coverage profile above 1.9x while maintaining a competitive CPE around current levels from PEER GROUP The most similar peers to IAT are Terminal One Group Association (TOGA; 'A-'/Stable Outlook) and LaGuardia Gateway Partners (LGP; 'BBB'/Stable Outlook) which operate under a similar, relatively unique business model as IAT and compete for New York air travel with other terminals at JFK, LGA, and EWR airports. While IAT and TOGA are operating terminals, LGP is under construction and as such, is subject to completion risk and more leveraged than its peers. IAT and LGP share similar, large-scale operations, which are double those of TOGA. TOGA's higher rating reflects a contractually-sound payment obligation from four major carriers on a jointand-several basis. RATING SENSITIVITIES Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative Rating Action: --A sharp decline in enplanements driven either by a reduction in services offered by airlines other than Delta or a failure by Delta to fully utilize the terminal resulting in a material change in financial metrics. --Any further significant construction works at the terminal, requiring

4 additional borrowing by IAT and thereby materially increasing its leverage profile. Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive Rating Action: --Due to the risks associated with the single asset nature of the terminal and the strong exposure to one airline, positive rating action is unlikely. CREDIT UPDATE JFK IAT, through its sole member, is a partly-owned subsidiary of Schiphol USA Inc., an indirect U.S. subsidiary of Schiphol Group, and was created as a special purpose vehicle to operate Terminal 4. IAT leases Terminal 4 under a long-term leasehold agreement with the PANYNJ expiring in Terminal 4 is home to over 30 international and domestic carriers, including Delta Airlines, who operates at the terminal under an anchor tenant agreement also expiring in Delta and its affiliates now account for over 60% of traffic within the terminal following the Delta-funded Phase II expansion project. PERFORMANCE UPDATE Traffic at Terminal 4 continues to increase following the completion of Phase II expansion project, with enplanements up 6% in 2016 to 10.3 million, and expected to reach 10.8 million in Delta and its affiliates continue to increase their presence at Terminal 4, accounting for approximately 63% of traffic in Aside from Delta, IAT maintains a diverse mix of carriers, with no one airline accounting for more than 6% of enplanements in the current year. While several carriers left the terminal following Delta's initial expansion, other airlines, such as WestJet, Thomas Cook Airlines, and Volaris have backfilled lost service. Air Serbia is also a new carrier that joined the terminal in Most notably, Virgin America has since moved to Terminal 7 due to a merger with Alaska Airlines. Fitch views near-term traffic increases as reasonable driven by increased operations from airlines and general economic growth in a very strong service area.

5 Increases in passenger traffic continue to improve financial performance with total revenue increasing 7.1% to $399 million in Total revenue growth was driven by an increase in international traffic and passenger terminal charges, exclusive airline space rentals, and other airline revenue. Delta's Terminal 4 payments grew by approximately 3.2% in 2016, while non-delta passenger terminal charges grew 11.1%. As such, blended CPE levels fell to a Fitch calculated approximately $36 in 2016, from around $41.5 in Despite the decrease, CPE levels remain elevated when compared to peers. However, the economic value to airlines serving the region is not in question and Fitch believes demand for slots at JFK remains strong. Further, when CPE is viewed in the context of higher airfares for international flights it is more reasonable. Total operation & maintenance (O&M) expenses increased coinciding with the completion of the terminal expansion project. In 2016, expenses increased 2.1% to approximately $100 million. In addition to O&M, IAT pays a ground rental fee for its lease of space at JFK with PANYNJ, which totalled approximately $23 million in 2016, and is expected to increase at an annual rate of no less than 4%. Costs are recovered in the terminal through Delta's airline payments and terminal charges from contract carriers, and Fitch expects expenses to moderate in the near term as the terminal reached a new base level of costs following Delta's increased operations. In 2018, expenses are expected to increase due to labour, repairs, and maintenance. An increase in minimum wage is the primary driver of the increase in labour costs and ultimately the projected 11.5% increase in O&M. New York State's minimum wage will be increasing by $2 from $11 to $13, before arriving at $15 in Part of this increase in expenses has already been absorbed in 2017, accounting for the estimated 8.8% increase in O&M. The growth in total revenue has enabled IAT to maintain solid coverage levels, at 2.3x in 2016 and expected to remain above 1.9x even under a period of economic decline. The project's overall leverage decreased faster than initially anticipated as a result of the relocation of domestic flights to the terminal. Fitch calculated leverage totalled approximately 4.2x in 2016, and is expected to continue to decrease to the 3x-4x range by Although a future Phase III expansion project remains uncertain, given the current involvement of Delta in the expansion of LGA, IAT management does not

6 foresee additional leverage in the near term. FITCH CASES Under Fitch's five-year base case forecast, which assumes marginal Delta and contract carrier annual enplanement growth and escalating costs of approximately 5% annually, coverage averages 2.4x through the forecast period. Following non-aviation revenue growth in 2016, CPE levels are expected to remain generally in line with historical levels, remaining in the $39-$40 range through Fitch's rating case contemplates debt service coverage under a stressed condition aimed to capture a decrease in near-term traffic with moderate recovery thereafter. Debt service coverage remains at or above 1.9x through 2021 in the rating case. The profile remains resilient to traffic losses with leverage remaining around 4x in 2018, decreasing to the low 3x range in Total blended CPE increases, yet remains in the $40-$41 range. IAT's financial profile in a rating case scenario remains strong due to the increase in Delta's domestic airline activity resulting from the Phase II expansion, and is better aligned with Fitch criteria and peers at 'BBB+'. SECURITY The bonds are secured by a facility rental payment made to PANYNJ, by IAT, in an amount sufficient to cover the required debt service obligations annually through to maturity, and by a leasehold mortgage pledged to the trustee in the leased premises. Contact: Primary Analyst Seth Lehman Senior Director Fitch Ratings, Inc. 33 Whitehall Street

7 New York, NY Secondary Analyst Jeffrey Lack Director Committee Chairperson Scott Zuchorski Senior Director Media Relations: Sandro Scenga, New York, Tel: , Additional information is available on Applicable Criteria Rating Criteria for Airports (pub. 14 Dec 2016) ( Rating Criteria for Infrastructure and Project Finance (pub. 24 Aug 2017) ( Additional Disclosures Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form ( Solicitation Status ( Endorsement Policy ( ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: ( IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS

8 ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT ( PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE AT ( FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright 2017 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY Telephone: , (212) Fax: (212) Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular

9 security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided as is without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other

10 obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no ) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001 Solicitation Status Fitch Ratings was paid to determine each credit rating announced in this Rating Action Commentary (RAC) by the obligatory being rated or the issuer, underwriter, depositor, or sponsor of the security or money market instrument being rated, except for the following: Endorsement Policy - Fitch's approach to ratings endorsement so that ratings produced outside the EU may be used by regulated entities within the EU for regulatory purposes, pursuant to the terms of the EU Regulation with respect to credit rating agencies, can be found on the EU Regulatory Disclosures ( page. The endorsement status of all International ratings is provided within the entity summary page for each rated entity and in the transaction detail pages for all structured finance transactions on the Fitch website. These disclosures are updated on a daily basis.