5 Areas that Major U.S. Banks Should Leverage between CCAR and Basel III
|
|
- Shanon Charles
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CLARENDONPTRS.COM 5 Areas that Major U.S. Banks Should Leverage between CCAR and Basel III CCAR Basel III OPTIMIZATION OF REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS Learn how executives and compliance directors from major U.S. Bank Holding Companies can increase efficiency by focusing on the aspects where the CCAR and Basel III programs overlap. Practical solutions that work.
2 5 Areas that Major U.S. Banks Should Leverage between CCAR and Basel III Introduction In July of 2013, the Federal Reserve Board (FRB) approved a final rule for the implementation of Basel III 1 regulatory capital reforms into its annual stress protocol. For the major U.S. Bank Holding Companies (MUSBHCs) that are required to comply with the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) 2 program, this measure made it more difficult to continually meet the minimum capital requirements ratios set forth by the FRB. Most notably, the revision introduced a common equity tier one ratio, and mandated a steady increase in the quantity and quality of required capital holdings for MUSBHCs to be phased in up until The substantial regulatory burden placed on MUSBHCs since the global credit crisis of has been welldocumented, and the Basel III final rule is yet another method of forcing these companies to forgo profits in order to maintain capital requirements and reduce risk. But a less well-known impact of the Basel III final rule is that it provides MUSBHCs with opportunities to step back and more efficiently organize their compliance activities. While achieving CCAR and Basel III compliance are not entirely seamless propositions, there are a large number of overlapping regulatory requirements between the two programs. The following two organizational structures are predominant for MUSBHCs when it comes to compliance: Separate CCAR and Basel III teams Combined CCAR and Basel III teams A representative from one of the MUSBHCs highlights the advantages to standing up two separate model development teams for CCAR and Basel III: Basel models are fundamentally simple, with a dominant emphasis on following very specific regulations. The CCAR models can be much more complex [they seek to] capture behavior over many time periods, and need to replicate business processes. [CCAR and Basel] each has its own documentation requirements and production support requirements. A representative from another MUSBHC prefers to keep CCAR and Basel professionals working in a single, integrated team for each core area, citing this structure as one that creates clarity and consistency on how to deal with all issues around capital preservation and regulatory requirements. When comparing the separated vs. single team approaches for satisfying the regulatory requirements of CCAR and Basel III, it is clear that each offers its own advantages and disadvantages, and that the required level of collaboration differs between MUSCBHCs. However, if executives and compliance directors from MUSBHCs are able to focus on the aspects where the CCAR and Basel III programs overlap, efficiencies can be found and exploited. 1 Internal regulatory framework for banks (Basel III). Last visited on August 4, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review 2015 Summary Instructions and Guidance. October
3 FIGURE 1: Overlap of CCAR Specific vs. Basel III Specific Characteristics As shown in figure 1, MUSBHCs can streamline operations and thereby cut compliance costs by re-thinking how they manage the following 5 core areas of CCAR and Basel III: 1 Data Processing and Management Model Development Model Validation Internal Audit and Control Reporting CCAR Specific Basel III Specific Overlap Data must cover a full economic cycle Models are generally more complex due to broad interpretation and framework flexibility Reporting is more extensive Data Processing and Management Model Development and Implementation Model Validation Internal Control and Audit Data must go back 5 years More straightforward framework leads to less complex models Reporting is included within CCAR reporting Reporting Data Processing and Management The reference data sets required are similar in most aspects for CCAR and Basel stress testing. Managers of data processing and management at MUSBHCs must be cognizant, however, that CCAR and Basel are different in terms of 1) historical timeframe requirements and 2) securities classification. Basel requires MUSBHCs to include 5 years of historical data in their reference data sets. CCAR does not specify a numerical historical timeframe requirement, mandating instead that BHCs include a full economic cycle when selecting reference data. In addition, certain classifications of securities such as the definition of losses for loans differ between CCAR and Basel. MUSBHC project managers who are in charge of data teams must take these differences into account when processing and organizing data to be used the by the organization during preparation for CCAR and Basel compliance. Both CCAR and Basel III regulations nonetheless require efficient data infrastructure to compile, clean, and consolidate data from risk and finance systems. Reliable, comprehensive data processing and control systems are critical to support risk identification, risk aggregation, quantitative modeling, stress-testing and reporting exercises. 2
4 A group of well-organized and highly collaborative CCAR and Basel III professionals should work to accomplish the following data-related tasks at MUSBHCs: Collate and organize historical data to capture a full economic and business cycle; ideally at both the account and monthly level Forecast accurate economic loss data including loss amount and loss date for each resolution type (charge off, REO sale, and NPL sale) Facilitate well-justified treatment of bank mergers, records of management actions, government intervention, portfolio liquidation, and other disruptive events Build a warehouse that efficiently stores and sorts the following data elements: market risk, counter-party credit risk, liquidation risk, operational risk, economic capital and risk-weighted assets (RWAs) 3 Market risk exposure: the Value at Risk (VaR) metric employs variance/covariance matrices and historical/ Monte Carlo simulation. Variable selection is dependent on information ranking, pattern discovery, clustering, and population validation. CCAR allows for a more flexible framework in terms of model development and implementation. This flexibility, however, sometimes leads to the construction of CCAR models that utilize more advanced modeling methods than corresponding Basel models. The high number of similarities between the two frameworks still allow for CCAR and Basel models to be streamlined among a consolidated group of professionals with the optionality of building separate CCAR models when necessary. Model Validation 2 Model Development MUSBHCs are required to develop their quantitative models in a manner that closely integrates business strategy across assets classes and at each line of business into the capital framework. These models development and implementation therefore become paramount in building an initial line of defense for supporting the reporting deliverables required to satisfy both CCAR and Basel III. Many MUSBHCs currently build models to satisfy both CCAR and Basel III regulations that have the following shared characteristics: The quantitative methodologies fall into one of two categories: loss estimation and Pre-Provision Net Revenue (PPNR) projection. Parametric modeling methods (such as discrete choice, survival analysis, linear regression, and time series) are widely used for credit loss estimation and revenue projection. Non-parametric approaches (classification tree and regression tree) are complementary to derive Probability of Default (PD), Loss Given Default (LGD), and Exposure at Default (EAD) metrics. MUSBHCs should have a transparent, repeatable, and well-supported validation framework to evaluate: Conceptual soundness with developmental evidence Ongoing monitoring of implemented models Outcome analysis from back testing Conservative assumptions for loss forecasting and revenue estimation are expected to be applied throughout the stress testing process to ensure the appropriateness of each test. Highly segmented, independentlyworking model validation teams for CCAR and Basel often add significant costs for major U.S. BHCs. Collaboration between these teams allows MUSBHCs to operate more efficiently because of the ability to share code libraries and hire contract employees that have the niche skills required to complete the necessary model validation procedures in a timely manner. 3
5 CLARENDONPTRS.COM 4 5 Internal Audit and Control The internal audit and control process is known as the third line, or last line, of defense for the MUSBHCs among industry insiders. These teams evaluate the entire capital planning process and ensure the integrity of each assessment metric and deliverable before they are probed and tested by regulatory authorities. MUSBHCs often combine their CCAR and Basel III internal audit and control teams into one without significantly increasing operational risk. Most MUSBHCs require many rounds of reconciliation and crosschecking between business lines and project teams throughout the internal audit and control process. When the internal audit and control teams work independently, this creates more work for all parties involved, as personnel are often asked to deliver the same deliverables twice or more. The act of streamlining the internal audit and control process for both CCAR and Basel III addresses the requirements from both sets of regulations, and can substantially improve the efficiency of a MUSBHC s capital planning process. Reporting The regulatory reports necessary for CCAR submission are similar to Basel III in several aspects. In fact, Basel III reports are generally included within CCAR submission reporting packages (FRY 14 reports, e.g.). Reports are presented in a wide range of templates and frequency requirements (ranging from monthly to annually). Most are complex and time consuming, with thousands of line items and metrics included in each. Given the similarities between CCAR and Basel III reporting requirements, MUSBHCs that silo the two project teams in charge of each will inevitably waste resources by forcing their teams to complete the same work twice. With a project manager that can properly ensure that the team understands the differences between CCAR and Basel III reporting requirements while at the same time exploiting the similarities to reduce time and resource expenditure, MUSBHCs will benefit from streamlining their CCAR and Basel III reporting teams as much as possible. FIGURE 2: List of 31 CCAR Banks (MUSBHCS) All of the banks listed below have consolidated assets of $50 billion or more, and were therefore required to submit capital plans to the Federal Reserve: American Express CitiGroup, Inc. Morgan Stanley U.S. Bancorp Bank of America Corporation The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. Northern Trust Corporation Wells Fargo & Co. The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation HSBC North America Holdings Inc. The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Capital One Financial Corporation JP Morgan Chase and Co. State Street Corporation Ally Financial Inc. Citizens Financial Group, Inc. Fifth Third Bancorp MUFG Americas Holding Corporation Zions Bancorporation BB&T Corporation Comerica Incorporated Huntington Bancshares Incorporated Regions Financial Corporation BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc. Deutsche Bank Trust Corporation KeyCorp Santander USA Holdings, Inc. BMO Financial Corp. Discover Financial Services M&T Bank Corporation SunTrust Banks, Inc. 4
6 Conclusion The CCAR and Basel III compliance programs are largely similar, with a few key differences. These differences are mostly in the areas of data classification and treatment, modelling theory and framework, and reporting. MUSBHCs should seek to exploit the similarities between CCAR and Basel III whenever possible thereby creating a more efficient compliance operation without compromising accuracy or effectiveness. The focus on collaboration between CCAR and Basel III teams cuts costs and creates efficiencies by 1) lowering the number of FTEs and consultants required, 2) streamlining communication teams and business lines, and 3) minimizing repeat deliverables that are inevitably produced when the CCAR and Basel III teams work separately. Clarendon Partners combines extensive industry knowledge with business skills that allow us to deliver pragmatic advice and guidance to help our clients improve performance, effectively manage risk, and gain insights from data in order to achieve their business objectives. Rather than following a formulaic methodology, we tailor our approach to each engagement to improve the outcomes for our clients. Since its inception, Clarendon Partners has developed a reputation for working with financial services firms to improve performance, effectively manage risk, and gain insights to achieve business objectives. Our team has experience working with a diverse group of bank holding companies to develop advanced statistical models, formulate sophisticated business strategies, and facilitate organizational transformations. For MUSBHCs that seek to improve the efficiency of their compliance activities, Clarendon Partners has the knowledge and expertise to assist in each applicable core area. 7 Clarendon Partners. All rights reserved Clarendon Blvd., Suite 102, Arlington, VA clarendonptrs.com
Visuals of 2016 CCAR and DFAST Results
July, 1 Visuals of 1 CCAR and DFAST Results This document includes visuals of the Federal Reserve s 1 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review ( CCAR ) results as well as the supervisory Dodd- Frank Act
More information2014 Stress Test and CCAR Summary & Analysis
2014 and CCAR Summary & Analysis On March 20, 2014, the Federal Reserve (the Fed ) released its 2014 Dodd-Frank Act (DFAST) results. This DFAST process tests how capital of the largest 30 U.S. banks and
More informationANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS. April 8, 2014
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS April 8, 2014 Cautionary Statement A number of statements in our presentations, the accompanying slides and the responses to your questions are forward-looking statements.
More informationQuarterly Trends for Consolidated U.S. Banking Organizations Third quarter 2014
Quarterly Trends for Consolidated U.S. Banking Organizations Third quarter 214 Federal Reserve Bank of New York Research and Statistics Group This report presents consolidated financial statistics for
More informationQuarterly Trends for Consolidated U.S. Banking Organizations First quarter 2015
Quarterly Trends for Consolidated U.S. Banking Organizations First quarter 15 Federal Reserve Bank of New York Research and Statistics Group This report presents consolidated financial statistics for the
More informationQuarterly Trends for Consolidated U.S. Banking Organizations First quarter 2016
Quarterly Trends for Consolidated U.S. Banking Organizations First quarter 6 Federal Reserve Bank of New York Research and Statistics Group This report presents consolidated financial statistics for the
More informationQuarterly Trends for Consolidated U.S. Banking Organizations Fourth Quarter 2017
Quarterly Trends for Consolidated U.S. Banking Organizations Fourth Quarter 7 Federal Reserve Bank of New York Research and Statistics Group This report presents consolidated financial statistics for the
More informationThe Capital and Loss Assessment Under Stress Scenarios (CLASS) Model
The Capital and Loss Assessment Under Stress Scenarios (CLASS) Model Beverly Hirtle, Federal Reserve Bank of New York (joint work with James Vickery, Anna Kovner and Meru Bhanot) Federal Reserve in the
More informationComprehensive Capital Analysis and Review 2012: Methodology and Results for Stress Scenario Projections
Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review 2012: Methodology and Results for Stress Scenario Projections March 13, 2012 BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM Comprehensive Capital Analysis and
More informationLiquidity Management in the New Era Regulatory Update
Liquidity Management in the New Era Regulatory Update Jeff Avers Director, Corporate Liquidity Specialist April 205 Regulatory Reform: Strengthened but not Simplified 2 Regulatory Reform A Sampling Higher
More informationDesignating Bank SIFIs: An Arbitrary Threshold for Risk
Designating Bank SIFIs: An Arbitrary Threshold for Risk James Barth and Moutusi Sau November 2015 In response to the recent severe financial crisis and the worst recession since the Great Depression, the
More informationflash Newsletter Issue #45 April 24, 2013
flash Newsletter Issue # April, Influence of Federal Reserve on Compensation Design in Financial Services An Analysis of Compensation Disclosures of Large Banking Organizations April By Eric Hosken and
More informationINDUSTRY REPORT JUNE 2016 FINANCIAL SERVICES
REPORT INDUSTRY REPORT JUNE 2016 FINANCIAL SERVICES 2015/2016 INDUSTRY REPORT CAP is a leading independent consulting firm specializing in executive and director compensation and related corporate governance
More informationEstimating Commercial Real Estate (CRE) Stressed Loss Measures Under Federal Reserve 2016 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) Scenarios
MARCH 2016 QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH GROUP MODELING METHODOLOGY Estimating Commercial Real Estate (CRE) Stressed Loss Measures Under Federal Reserve 2016 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) Scenarios
More informationGoldman Sachs U.S. Financial Services Conference 2018
Goldman Sachs U.S. Financial Services Conference 2018 Andy Cecere Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Terry Dolan Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer December 4, 2018 U.S. BANCORP Forward-looking
More informationEnhanced Disclosure Task Force 2015 Progress Report Appendix 4: Leading Practice Examples of EDTF Recommendations. October 2015
Enhanced Disclosure Task Force 2015 Progress Report Appendix 4: Leading Practice Examples of EDTF Recommendations October 2015 1 Table of Contents Page 1 General recommendations 4 2 Risk governance and
More informationBank Capital Plans and Stress Tests
Federal Reserve Issues Instructions and Guidance for the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review and Capital Plan Review Programs for 2013: Outline of Certain Key Aspects On November 9, 2012, the Board
More informationWelcome Huntington Bancshares Incorporated
Welcome Huntington Bancshares Incorporated 2018 RBC Capital Markets Financial Institutions Conference March 7, 2018 2018 Huntington Bancshares Incorporated. All rights reserved. (NASDAQ: HBAN) Disclaimer
More informationCredit Suisse Financial Services Conference. Jeffrey M. Peek, Chairman & CEO February 2009
Credit Suisse Financial Services Conference Jeffrey M. Peek, Chairman & CEO February 2009 Forward-Looking Statements This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable
More informationBank Capital Plans and Stress Tests
Federal Reserve Issues Instructions and Guidance for the 2015 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review Program On October 16, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Federal Reserve
More informationBancAnalysts Association of Boston Conference Presentation. November 9, 2018
BancAnalysts Association of Boston Conference Presentation November 9, 2018 Disclaimer This presentation contains forward- looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
More informationShareholders at the Top 50 Say Yes on Pay
Shareholders at the Top 50 Say Yes on Pay By Julie Lewis and Greg Loehmann July 7, 2011 If investors are dissatisfied with executive pay, voting results during this proxy season are certainly not reflecting
More informationUnit of Measure and Dependence
2011 Update Industry Position Paper Unit of Measure and Dependence Introduction This paper on Unit of Measure and assumptions surrounding the estimation of dependence between losses drawn from different
More informationCURRENT EXPECTED CREDIT LOSSES (CECL) BENCHMARKING SURVEY
CURRENT EXPECTED CREDIT LOSSES (CECL) BENCHMARKING SURVEY INTRODUCTION EXEC SUMMARY Surveying industry readiness for CECL We are pleased to present the results of our CECL survey, which assesses U.S. banks
More informationHUNTINGTON BANCSHARES INCORPORATED
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event
More informationThe Decline of Too Big to Fail
The Decline of Too Big to Fail Antje Berndt Darrell Duffie Yichao Zhu ANU Stanford ANU 2019 Dolomites Winter Finance Conference Big-bank credit spreads much higher after the crisis 300 1.6 Fitted big bank
More informationThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES For the period ended June 30, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Index of Tables 1 Introduction 2 Regulatory Capital 5 Capital Structure 6 Risk-Weighted
More informationReviewing DFAST And CCAR Results. Coming off recent passage of living wills, large banks continue to pass stress tests June 2017
Reviewing DFAST And CCAR Results Coming off recent passage of living wills, large banks continue to pass stress tests June 017 Executive Summary The largest banks have more than doubled capital since the
More informationStress Tests From stressful times to business as usual an updated point of view
Stress Tests From stressful times to business as usual an updated point of view Informational presentation for our clients May 2009 1 Point of view From stressful times to business as usual Stress test
More informationPILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. December 2012 PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES For the period ended June 30, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Index of Tables 2 Introduction 3 Regulatory Capital 7 Capital Structure 8
More informationPILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES
. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. December 2012 PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES For the period ended December 31, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Index of Tables 2 Introduction 3 Regulatory Capital 7 Capital Structure
More informationRegulatory Capital Disclosures
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. Regulatory Capital Disclosures For the period ended December 31, 2013 0 Page Introduction The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (Group Inc.) is a leading global investment banking,
More informationThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Goldman Sachs Bank USA Annual Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Disclosure
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Goldman Sachs Bank USA 2018 Annual Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Disclosure June 2018 1 Overview and Requirements For the U.S. Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
More informationThe Supervisory Capital Assessment Program: Motivation and Results of the Bank Stress Test
The Supervisory Capital Assessment Program: Motivation and Results of the Bank Stress Test Beverly Hirtle, Til Schuermann, and Kevin Stiroh Federal Reserve Bank of New York January 14, 2010 * Disclaimer
More informationThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES For the period ended September 30, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Index of Tables 1 Introduction 2 Regulatory Capital 5 Capital Structure 6 Risk-Weighted
More informationThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and. Goldman Sachs Bank USA Annual Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Disclosure
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Goldman Sachs Bank USA 2014 Annual Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Disclosure March 2014 1 2014 Annual Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Disclosure for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
More informationRegulatory Capital Disclosures Report. For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2014
REGULATORY CAPITAL DISCLOSURES REPORT For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014 Table of Contents Page Part I Overview 1 Morgan Stanley... 1 Part II Market Risk Capital Disclosures 1 Risk-based Capital
More informationMarket Risk Capital Disclosures Report. For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2014
MARKET RISK CAPITAL DISCLOSURES REPORT For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014 Table of Contents Page Part I Overview 1 Morgan Stanley... 1 Part II Market Risk Capital Disclosures 1 Risk-based Capital
More informationUnderstanding the Economics of Large Banks
TCH Research Study November 2011 Understanding the Economics of Large Banks 3 Introduction Sidebar: Review of literature on large banks................................................................................................................................5
More informationBMO Equal Weight US Banks Index ETF (ZBK) (the ETF )
ANNUAL MANAGEMENT REPORT OF FUND PERFORMANCE (ZBK) (the ETF ) For the 12-month period ended December 31, 2018 (the Period ) Manager: BMO Asset Management Inc. (the Manager and portfolio manager ) Management
More informationThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES For the period ended December 31, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Index of Tables 1 Introduction 2 Regulatory Capital 5 Capital Structure 6 Risk-Weighted
More information2011 FBR Fall Investor Conference. November 29, 2011
2011 FBR Fall Investor Conference November 29, 2011 Disclaimer This presentation contains forward looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act giving the Company's
More informationDodd-Frank Act 2013 Mid-Cycle Stress Test
Dodd-Frank Act 2013 Mid-Cycle Stress Test Submitted to the Federal Reserve Bank on July 5, 2013 SECTION TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1 Background to Mid-Cycle Company-Run Stress Test 1 2 Description of the Company
More informationU.S. Bancorp Fixed Income Investor Presentation
U.S. Bancorp Fixed Income Investor Presentation May 2017 U.S. BANCORP Forward-looking Statements and Additional Information The following information appears in accordance with the Private Securities Litigation
More informationCOMMENTS ON: RETHINKING FINANCIAL STABILITY BY AIKMAN, HALDANE, HINTERSCHWEIGER AND KAPADIA
COMMENTS ON: RETHINKING FINANCIAL STABILITY BY AIKMAN, HALDANE, HINTERSCHWEIGER AND KAPADIA Jeremy Stein Harvard University Peterson Institute Rethinking Macro Policy Conference October 12-13, 2017 DOES
More informationRegulatory Capital Disclosures
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. Regulatory Capital Disclosures For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013 0 P age Introduction The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (Group Inc.) is a leading global investment
More informationProportionality in regulation Brazilian experience. 18th Annual International Conference on Policy Challenges for the Financial Sector
Proportionality in regulation Brazilian experience 18th Annual International Conference on Policy Challenges for the Financial Sector Agenda Motivation Proportionality in International Standards Implementation
More informationI. Scenario Analysis Perspectives & Principles
Industry Position Paper I. Scenario Analysis Perspectives & Principles Introduction This paper on Scenario Analysis (SA) (Part I Perspectives and Principles) is one in a series of industry position papers
More informationCCAR and DFAST The journey continues
CCAR and DFAST The journey continues July 2016 CCAR and DFAST The journey continues The Federal Reserve (Fed) released the results of its Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) for 2016 on June
More informationThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES For the period ended December 31, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Index of Tables 1 Introduction 2 Regulatory Capital 5 Capital Structure 6 Risk-Weighted
More informationMorgan Stanley 3Q15 Fixed Income Investor Call. November 3, 2015
Morgan Stanley 3Q15 Fixed Income Investor Call November 3, 2015 Notice The information provided herein may include certain non-gaap financial measures. The reconciliation of such measures to the comparable
More informationInvestor Presentation Q1 2018
Investor Presentation Q1 2018 2 CAUTION CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This presentation contains forward looking statements regarding, among other things, Desjardins Group s business objectives
More informationOverview and Assessment of the Methodology Used by the Federal Reserve to Calibrate the Single-Counterparty Credit Limit
Overview and Assessment of the Methodology Used by the Federal Reserve to Calibrate the Single-Counterparty Credit Limit June 2016 SUMMARY In March 2016, the Federal Reserve issued a notice of proposed
More informationGoldman Sachs Group UK (GSGUK) Pillar 3 Disclosures
Goldman Sachs Group UK (GSGUK) Pillar 3 Disclosures For the year ended December 31, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Introduction... 3 Regulatory Capital... 6 Risk-Weighted Assets... 7 Credit Risk... 7
More informationThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES For the period ended March 31, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Index of Tables 1 Introduction 2 Regulatory Capital 5 Capital Structure 6 Risk-Weighted
More information2015 Annual DFAST. SunTrust Banks, Inc. Dodd-Frank Act 2015 Annual Stress Test Results Disclosure. March 6, 2015
SunTrust Banks, Inc. Dodd-Frank Act 2015 Annual Stress Test Results Disclosure March 6, 2015 Page 1 of 8 03/6/2015 Overview SunTrust Banks, Inc. ( SunTrust or the Company ) regularly evaluates financial
More informationM&T Bank Corporation. Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company. Company-Run Stress Test Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Results Disclosure.
M&T Bank Corporation Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company Company-Run Stress Test Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Results Disclosure June 21, 2018 1 Explanatory Note In accordance with Section 165(i)(2)
More informationDodd-Frank Act 2014 Mid-Cycle Stress Test. Submitted to the Federal Reserve Bank on July 3, 2014
Dodd-Frank Act 2014 Mid-Cycle Stress Test Submitted to the Federal Reserve Bank on July 3, 2014 Table of Contents Section Pages 1. Requirements for Mid-Cycle Company-Run Stress Test 4 2. Description of
More informationCitigroup Inc. Basel II.5 Market Risk Disclosures As of and For the Period Ended December 31, 2013
Citigroup Inc. Basel II.5 Market Risk Disclosures and For the Period Ended TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW 3 Organization 3 Capital Adequacy 3 Basel II.5 Covered Positions 3 Valuation and Accounting Policies
More informationSupervisory Views on Bank Economic Capital Systems: What are Regulators Looking For?
Supervisory Views on Bank Economic Capital Systems: What are Regulators Looking For? Prepared By: David M Wright Group, Vice President Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco July, 2007 Any views expressed
More informationAlly Financial Inc. Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test 2015 Estimates in the Supervisory Severely Adverse Scenario
EX-99.1 2 ccar2015disclosure-finalxi.htm COMPREHENSIVE CAPITAL ANALYSIS AND REVIEW 2015 Overview Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test 2015 Estimates in the Supervisory Severely Adverse Scenario As required under
More informationU.S. Top Tier Bank Holding Companies (BHCs) as of June 30, 2013
Page 1 $8, Top Tier Bank Holding Companies (BHCs) as of June 3, 213 1, $6, 8 $4, 6 4 $2, 2 Total Consolidated Assets: $16,725 Total No. of Ins tu ons: 4,553 Total Assets of Top Tier BHCs Total Assets of
More informationCredit Suisse Financial Services Forum 2018
Credit Suisse Financial Services Forum 2018 Gunjan Kedia Vice Chairman, Wealth Management & Investment Services Mark Jordahl President, Wealth Management February 13, 2018 U.S. BANCORP Forward-looking
More informationCIBC Bank USA (f/k/a The PrivateBank and Trust Company)
CIBC Bank USA (f/k/a The PrivateBank and Trust Company) DODD-FRANK ACT COMPANY-RUN STRESS TEST DISCLOSURE UNDER SUPERVISORY SEVERELY ADVERSE SCENARIO OCTOBER 31, 2017 Introduction On June 29, 2016, PrivateBancorp,
More informationGoldman Sachs U.S. Financial Services Conference 2017
Goldman Sachs U.S. Financial Services Conference 2017 Andy Cecere President, CEO Terry Dolan Vice Chairman, CFO December 5, 2017 U.S. BANCORP Forward-looking Statements and Additional Information The following
More informationMeasuring the TBTF effect on bond pricing: Supplemental data
Measuring the TBTF effect on bond pricing: Supplemental data Data discussion This publication gives further information on the methodology used in our paper published on May 22, 2013, Measuring the TBTF
More informationU.S. Banking Sector: Rising NIMs, Payouts and Potential Regulatory Reform. August 14, Live Webcast and Q&A
U.S. Banking Sector: Rising NIMs, Payouts and Potential Regulatory Reform August 14, 2017 Live Webcast and Q&A Copyright 2017 by S&P Global. All rights reserved. Recent bank rating actions Company To From
More informationDiscussion of Accounting, Capital Requirements, and Financial Stability. Anne Beatty Deloitte and Touche Chair Ohio State University
Macro Financial Modeling Conference Session III Accounting and Financial Regulation March 10 th, 2017 Discussion of Accounting, Capital Requirements, and Financial Stability Anne Beatty Deloitte and Touche
More informationInvestor Presentation Q3 2018
Investor Presentation Q3 2018 2 CAUTION CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This presentation contains forward-looking statements regarding, among other things, Desjardins Group s business objectives
More information2018 Annual DFAST. SunTrust Banks, Inc. Dodd-Frank Act 2018 Annual Stress Test Results Disclosure. June 21, 2018
SunTrust Banks, Inc. Dodd-Frank Act 2018 Annual Stress Test Results Disclosure June 21, 2018 Page 1 of 8 06/21/2018 Overview SunTrust Banks, Inc. ( SunTrust or the Company ) regularly evaluates financial
More informationThe Market for OTC Credit Derivatives
The Market for OTC Credit Derivatives Andrew G. Atkeson Andrea L. Eisfeldt Pierre-Olivier Weill UCLA Economics UCLA Anderson UCLA Economics July 23, 213 over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives Credit default
More informationThe Capital Allocation Inherent in the Federal Reserve s Capital Stress Test
The Capital Allocation Inherent in the Federal Reserve s Capital Stress Test January 2017 Francisco Covas +1.202.649.4605 francisco.covas@theclearinghouse.org EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Post-crisis, U.S. bank regulators
More informationComplying with CECL. We assess five ways to implement the new regulations. September 2017
Complying with CECL We assess five ways to implement the new regulations September 2017 Analytical contacts Manish Kumar Director, Risk & Analytics, India manish.kumar@crisil.com Manish Malhotra Lead Analyst,
More information2018 Mid-Cycle Stress Test Disclosure
DB USA Corporation 2018 Mid-Cycle Stress Test Disclosure TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 OVERVIEW AND REQUIREMENTS... 3 1.1 Overview and Description of DB USA Corp. s Severely Adverse Scenario... 4 2 RISK TYPES...
More informationWhat Market Risk Capital Reporting Tells Us about Bank Risk
Beverly J. Hirtle What Market Risk Capital Reporting Tells Us about Bank Risk Since 1998, U.S. bank holding companies with large trading operations have been required to hold capital sufficient to cover
More informationInvested in Our Clients
Invested in Our Clients Annual Meeting of Shareholders April 11, 2017 Cautionary Statement A number of statements in our presentations, the accompanying slides and the responses to your questions are forward-looking
More informationAccuracy, straight down the line.
Trusted by the Market. Driven by You. www.yieldbook.com Accuracy, straight down the line. Portfolio analysis and risk management The is a trusted and authoritative source for fixed income analytics that
More informationRoyal Bank of Canada Investor Presentation
Royal Bank of Investor Presentation April 2009 RBC INVESTOR PRESENTATION 1 Caution regarding forward-looking statements From time to time, we make written or oral forward-looking statements within the
More informationLive Webcast and Q&A August 10, 2016 Copyright 2016 by S&P Global. All rights reserved.
U.S. Banking Sector: Searching For The Road Forward Live Webcast and Q&A August 10, 2016 Copyright 2016 by S&P Global. All rights reserved. Our 2016 outlook for U.S. banks Revenue Expect revenues to remain
More information2015 Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test (DFAST)
2015 Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test (DFAST) Company-Run Dodd-Frank Stress Test Submitted to the Federal Reserve Bank on January 5, 2015 Updated as of June 15, 2015 to include Morgan Stanley Private Bank, National
More informationDeutsche Bank s response to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision consultative document on the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book.
EU Transparency Register ID Number 271912611231-56 31 January 2014 Mr. Wayne Byres Secretary General Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Bank for International Settlements Centralbahnplatz 2 Basel Switzerland
More informationBasel III: Comparison of Standardized and Advanced Approaches
Risk & Compliance the way we see it Basel III: Comparison of Standardized and Advanced Approaches Implementation and RWA Calculation Timelines Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary 3 2. Introduction 4
More informationSeptember 14, Dear Mr. Byres:
Mr. Wayne Byres Head of the Secretariat of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Bank for International Settlements CH 4002 Basel, Switzerland Email baselcommittee@bis.org Dear Mr. Byres: Please find
More informationGoldman Sachs Group UK Limited. Pillar 3 Disclosures
Goldman Sachs Group UK Limited Pillar 3 Disclosures For the year ended December 31, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Introduction... 3 Capital Framework... 6 Regulatory Capital... 7 Risk Management... 8
More informationApril 24, Annual Stockholder Meeting
April 24, 2008 Annual Stockholder Meeting Forward looking statements Forward-Looking Information Please note that the following materials containing information regarding Capital One s financial performance
More informationDECEMBER 2010 BASEL II - PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, Madrid Branch INTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT PROCESS
DECEMBER 2010 BASEL II - PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES INTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT PROCESS JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, Madrid Branch Financial year ending December 31, 2010 Disclosures under
More informationComprehensive Capital Analysis and Review Summary Instructions and Guidance
Blackline: 2014 CCAR Instructions vs. CCAR 2013 Instructions* *Does not include disclosure table appendix. Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review 20132014 Summary Instructions and Guidance November
More informationBancWest Mid-Year Dodd Frank Act Company-Run Capital Stress Test Disclosure. BancWest Corporation
BancWest 2017 Mid-Year Dodd Frank Act Company-Run Capital Stress Test Disclosure BancWest Corporation BancWest Overview Incorporated in this disclosure are the mid-year stress test results of BancWest
More informationFEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF MINNEAPOLIS BANKING AND POLICY STUDIES
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF MINNEAPOLIS BANKING AND POLICY STUDIES Minneapolis Options Report October 3 rd Risk neutral expectations for inflation continue to fall. Bank and Insurance company share prices
More informationA Primer on the Evolution and Complexity of Bank Regulatory Capital Standards
A Primer on the Evolution and Complexity of Bank Regulatory Capital Standards James R. Barth and Stephen Matteo Miller February 2017 MERCATUS WORKING PAPER James R. Barth and Stephen Matteo Miller. A Primer
More informationCCAR Stress Testing Basics. By: Michael Fadil October 17, 2012 Chicago
CCAR Stress Testing Basics By: Michael Fadil October 17, 2012 Chicago Risk Practitioner Conference - 2012 Stress Testing What is It?? Stress testing is a useful method for determining how a portfolio will
More informationfrom 2001:Q1 to 2014:Q1 BHCAP859 for advanced approach banks and Tier 1 Common Equity from 2014:Q1 to 2014:Q4. BHCAP859 after 2014:Q4
Appendix: Data Sources and Definitions This appendix contains the details concerning the construction of all the variables used in the construction of TCH Bank Conditions Index. The aggregate index synthesizes
More information2015 CCAR Results and Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Disclosure
2015 CCAR Results and Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Disclosure SEVERELY ADVERSE SCENARIO MARCH 13, 2015 A member of MUFG, a global financial group Table of Contents 1 Overview 3 2 Severely Adverse Scenario
More informationPILLAR 3 REGULATORY CAPITAL DISCLOSURES
PILLAR 3 REGULATORY CAPITAL DISCLOSURES For the quarterly period ended Table of Contents Disclosure map 1 Introduction 2 Report overview 2 Basel III overview 2 Enterprise-wide risk management 3 Governance
More informationSTRESS TESTING Transition to DFAST compliance
WHITE PAPER STRESS TESTING Transition to DFAST compliance Abstract The objective of this document is to explain the challenges related to stress testing that arise when a Community Bank crosses $0 Billion
More informationFEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF MINNEAPOLIS BANKING AND POLICY STUDIES
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF MINNEAPOLIS BANKING AND POLICY STUDIES Minneapolis Options Report July 25 th Banks Trading volumes were higher relative to two weeks ago but remained light. Stocks with above average
More informationOverview of Goldman Sachs. October 2014
Overview of Goldman Sachs October 2014 Cautionary Note on Forward Looking Statements Today s presentation may include forward-looking statements. These statements are not historical facts, but instead
More informationFederal Reserve Board Issues Final Rule Regarding Capital Plan and Formal Stress Test Requirements for Certain Large Bank Holding Companies
Federal Reserve Board Issues Final Rule Regarding Capital Plan and Formal Stress Test Requirements for Certain Large Bank Holding Companies BACKGROUND On November 22, 2011, the Board of Governors of the
More informationPILLAR 3 REGULATORY CAPITAL DISCLOSURES
PILLAR 3 REGULATORY CAPITAL DISCLOSURES For the quarterly period ended Table of Contents Disclosure map Introduction Report overview Basel III overview Enterprise-wide risk management Risk governance
More informationRETHINKING BANKING: FITTING YOUR BUSINESS MODEL TO REGULATORY CONSTRAINTS
RETHINKING BANKING: FITTING YOUR BUSINESS MODEL TO REGULATORY CONSTRAINTS Contents Introduction....................................... 3 Challenges for Firms..................................5 Regulatory
More information