Does Inconvenience Explain Low Take-up? Evidence from UI Claiming Procedures
|
|
- Darleen Norton
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Preliminary and Incomplete. Please Do Note Cite. Does Inconvenience Explain Low Take-up? Evidence from UI Claiming Procedures Avraham Ebenstein 1 Kevin Stange 2 November 7, 2005 Abstract One popular explanation for why many individuals do not apply for and claim the social benefits to which they are entitled is that doing so is inconvenient. Applications take time and some individuals may decide that the financial benefits do not outweigh these costs. This paper investigates this explanation by documenting the take-up and compositional effects of recent administrative changes that have made it easier for individuals to file initial claims for Unemployment Insurance. We find that the adoption of remote forms of UI claiming (e.g. phone, mail, Internet) did not have an appreciable impact on one rough measure of UI take-up, the claimant to unemployed ratio. At face value, this finding is inconsistent with a time- and transaction-cost explanation for low take-up if remote UI claiming is indeed less time-intensive, as claimant surveys suggest. We do find weak evidence for compositional shifts towards wealthier, more able claimants, which is consistent with the theory. 1 Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley. ebenstei@econ.berkeley.edu 2 Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley. kstange@econ.berkeley.edu 1
2 I. INTRODUCTION It has been documented that take-up of social programs in the United States is less than complete. In her extensive survey of the empirical evidence, Currie (2004) finds that take-up rates for means tested programs range from very low (8-14% for State Children s Health Insurance Program) to relatively high (82-87% for the Earned Income Tax Credit and 60-90% for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families), with most other major social programs falling somewhere in between. Take-up of non means-tested programs is generally higher (nearly 100% for Medicare), but often far from complete (72-83% for unemployment insurance). The latter is particularly puzzling if one expects the stigma associated with participation in non means-tested programs to be lower than that associated with means-tested ones. While stigma and informational issues are important, Currie concludes that concrete transaction costs must also be a major determinant of participation in social programs among those eligible. However, there has been relatively little direct evidence on the importance of these costs in practice. The importance of non-monetary program features such as the complexity of application paperwork, the presence of default or automatic enrollment, mandated in-person interviews or the frequency of re-application have been largely ignored in studies of social program participation, despite their potential importance. This present study addresses this void by examining the take-up consequences of changes in unemployment insurance claiming procedures over the 1990 s. Between 1990 and 2003, many states abandoned the practice of requiring UI claimants to appear in person at local offices in favor of easier, remote filing methods such as phone, mail, and the Internet. If these changes reduced the transaction costs associated with receiving UI benefits, then a simple model of program participation would suggest that overall take-up should increase as a result. Furthermore, the marginal UI claimant should shift further up the income distribution if income is a proxy for the value of eligibles time. We exploit cross-state variation in the timing of UI claiming procedures in order to test these predictions. The experience of Colorado, the first state to receive initial UI claims by phone, is typical of our general findings. In 1990, nearly all initial UI claimants in Colorado filed in-person. By 1991, the share had dropped to fifty-four percent and by 1992, only three percent of claims were made in person. However, the number of claims per unemployed person our measure of take-up and the composition of claimants were virtually unchanged during that period. Figures 1 and 2 report the fraction of claims filed in-person, the number of initial claims filed per unemployed person, and some characteristics of claimants over time for Colorado. This same pattern emerges when we look across all 21 states that implemented sharp changes in UI claiming procedures and when we control for other factors that may influence take-up and claimant composition. Though preliminary, these findings suggest that in aggregate 2
3 individuals eligible for UI did not respond to dramatic improvements in filing ease, casting doubt on inconvenience as a major determinant of program participation, at least in the case of UI. This paper is organized as follows. The next section provides a brief theoretical motivation for understanding how claiming convenience may influence individual s take-up decisions. Section III provides background on UI claiming procedures in the US since 1988 with particular focus on why and how states implemented changes. Section IV details our empirical approach and introduces our data. Results are reported in Section V and Section VI concludes. II. THEORETICAL MOTIVATION [In Process] III. BACKGROUND ON UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE CLAIMING PROCEDURES IN U.S. One of the biggest administration changes in state UI programs over the past decade has been the introduction of remote methods for filing an initial claim. In 1990, virtually all claimants were required to file their initial claim for Unemployment Insurance at a local state UI office. 3 Beginning in 1991, however, claimants in the State of Colorado were required to file their initial claim by telephone. A single call center was established in Denver where claims takers solicited caller s information and filed their claim over the telephone. The state UI agency no longer maintained staff in local offices to collect initial claims. This change was primarily in response to cost pressure and a desire to improve customer service. Since 1991, almost all other states have followed or plan to follow Colorado s lead by implementing procedures to receive initial UI claims over the telephone. More recently, many states have introduced Internet claims filing as an additional remote filing alternative. Figure 3 plots the fraction of all initial UI claims that were filed using various methods from 1988 to In the late 1990 s, the fraction of claims filed in person dropped dramatically as more and more states introduced remote filing. By 2003, only one-quarter of all initial UI claims were filed in person. There has been considerable variation in the motivation for, details of, and timing of states implementation of telephone (and now Internet) claiming methods. The U.S. Department of Labor commissioned an evaluation study, completed in 2000, of the implementation and impact of telephone initial claims filing in seven states [Needles et. al., 2000], which we summarize here and in Table 1. State UI administrators reported two common motivations for their switch from in-person filing at local UI offices to telephone claiming: administrative cost savings and improved customer service. It was believed that centralized call centers would allow states to realize economies in staff, office space, and training, 3 Perhaps due to the remote nature of many of its communities, Alaska has long permitted individuals to file UI benefits through the mail. 3
4 while making claiming easier for clients. The authors conclude that some states experienced a reduction in costs, while others did not. In some states, reductions in personnel and office space rental costs were offset by increases in communication and in equipment-related costs. States also vary in their implementation details. The primary implementation decisions facing states are how quickly to implement, whether to close local UI offices after implementation, the number of call centers to open, whether to offer a toll-free number, and whether to use a Interactive Voice Response (IVR) system. Since cost-savings was a primary motivation, most states closed local UI offices (eliminating the in-person filing option) after the introduction of telephone claiming. However, many states offer claimants dedicated on-site telephones at local UI offices and One-Stop Centers (which provide other UI-related and job-search activities) to use to file initial claims. Most states make use of IVR technologies to automate part of the initial claims process and four of the seven profiled states offer toll-free numbers. Important for our approach is whether phone claiming is preferred to and more convenient than in-person claiming since most states eliminated the in-person filing option following the introduction of telephone claiming. As reported in Needles et. al. (2000), customer satisfaction surveys in Maine, Massachusetts, Missouri, and Wisconsin suggest that claimants overwhelmingly prefer telephone to inperson claiming. Eighty-six to ninety-six percent of respondents in these states, half of whom are former in-person filers, report that telephone claiming is easier, more convenient, or faster. In a 1998 nationwide survey of 2,773 claimants, respondents estimated that it took 11 minutes to file an initial claim by telephone and 61 minutes to file in-person [Marcus and Frees, 1998)]. A similar picture of considerable timesavings from telephone claiming was also found in surveys of claimants in San Diego (2:20 hours inperson to 14 minutes via phone) and Colorado (3.4 hours to 1.7 hours). The case of Massachusetts is also illustrative. Despite being given the option to file in-person, only 11% of individuals chose to do so in Though far from conclusive, these anecdotes suggest that remote claiming methods are overwhelmingly preferred to in-person methods. States also differed in the precise timing of their remote claiming implementation. Table 1 also lists the dates each state introduced telephone initial claiming and the fraction of all claims filed in person in each state from 1988 to Two features of this data are important for our empirical approach. First, states introduced remote claiming at different times and during different macroeconomic environments. There is actually considerable more timing variation than shown in Table 1, as there are many states that implemented telephone claiming after 1997 or not at all by Second, the shift from in-person to remote claiming is remarkably rapid in many states. Most states that have nearly universal remote initial claiming saw this change happen over the span of a few short years. As discussed in the next section, the 4
5 cross-state variation in timing of rapid remote claiming adoption is used to identify the effect of these changes on take-up and claimant composition. IV. EMPIRICAL APPROACH We utilize cross-state variation in the timing of changes to UI claiming procedures to assess the importance of convenience to UI program participation. As discussed in the previous section, states implement remote UI claiming at different times or often not at all. This permits us to identify treatment effects separately from aggregate year effects and unobserved state characteristics, both of which may also influence take-up and claimant composition. A. THE DATA We construct a panel dataset of states for the years 1988 to 2003 from several different sources. Information on UI claiming procedures is from the Benefit Accuracy Measurement (BAM) program, administered by the U.S. Department of Labor. BAM is designed to measure the accuracy of paid and denied UI claims and determine the source of any inaccuracies, in order to improve UI administrative processes. BAM samples approximately 400 UI claimants per year in each state. Most important for our purposes is that claiming method (in person, phone, mail, Internet, , through employer) is recorded for each person in the sample. From this data, we estimate the fraction of UI claimants using each method in each state for every year from 1988 to As described in the next section, these fractions are used to construct policy event indicator variables and identify states to be used as a control group. Administrative data on the number of initial claimants, average duration on UI, number of weeks compensated and claimed, average weekly benefit amount, and several other measures of UI utilization were obtained from the Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration, quarterly by state. The unemployment rate and the number of individuals unemployed, employed, and in the labor force was obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. We use the ratio of initial claims per unemployed person as our measure of UI program take-up. Finally, from the March CPS we obtain characteristics of all unemployed individuals at a point in time as well as characteristics of individuals who claimed to have received unemployment compensation in the previous year. The characteristics of the unemployed population in a given year are used as controls in our regression analysis, while characteristics of retrospective UI recipients in a year are used as a dependent variable. All nominal values for earnings, wages, and benefit amounts are converted to 2003 Dollars using the CPI-U. B. DEFINITION OF EVENT AND CONTROL STATES We define a remote claiming event to be a sudden decline in the fraction of individuals that file UI claims in-person. We operationalize this definition by identifying the first year in which more than 5
6 20% of a state s UI claims were filed remotely and defining this year as the event year. While this threshold is inherently arbitrary, it aligns reasonably well with the actual timing of phone claiming implementation for the seven states depicted in Table 1. We also restrict the sample to states that experienced a sharp event: dropping from at least 80% of claims in-person to at least 80% remote over a two-year span. Finally, to permit at least two post-event observations, we further restrict the sample to states whose remote claiming event occurred before Overall, twenty-one states passed these criteria and were used as event states in the analysis. To estimate aggregate-level yearly trends in the absence of remote claiming technology, we also sought to develop a group of control states whose claiming methods did not change appreciable over the period. Any state whose fraction of claims filed remotely did not change by at least thirty percentage points over the period was used as a control state. This procedure generates 12 control states (including the District of Columbia). C. ESTIMATION MODEL Throughout, we estimate variants of Equation (1) using least squares (1) yit = γ 0 + γ R Rit + γ R Rit + γ R Rit + γ RRit + γ RRit + γ RRit + γ RRit + γ X X it + γ i + γ t + ε it Our outcome measure y it is the number of UI claimants per person unemployed in state i in year t. This is one commonly used, though rough, measure of UI take-up. Our policy indicator variable R is an indicator for time relative to the first year state i permitted remote UI claiming. k it equals 1 if more than 20% of UI claims were filed remotely in state i for the first time k years earlier, and zero otherwise. Thus 3 R it, claiming event took place. 2 R it, and 1 R it are indicators for time periods before the remote X it is a vector of time-varying covariates such as the unemployment rate and the characteristics of the unemployed population in state i during year t. γ i and γ t are fixed state and year effects, while ε it is an error term. The parameters of interest are{ γ k R}, which can be interpreted as the effect of having adopted remote UI claiming k periods earlier on UI take-up in the 0 current period. γ R is the UI take-up change in the first year remote claiming was permitted, relative to not adopting the policy. We assume these effects to be constant across states and over calendar time. This method can be thought of as a generalized difference-in-difference, where a treatment-control difference is calculated at several points before and after treatment. When a full set of state and year effects is included, { γ k R} is estimated on policy changes within states over time, net of any aggregate yearly changes in UI take-up common to all states. Fixed differences in the levels of UI take-up k R it 6
7 across states will be absorbed into state fixed effects. In Equation (1), the unobserved counterfactual is implicitly estimated from individual state level effects (identified by pre-event observations) and aggregate time trends (identified by control states). This specification has the additional benefit of possessing a built-in test of our identification assumptions: if the policy event is sharp and not correlated with pre-existing trends in UI take-up within states, pre-event coefficients { 3, 2, γ γ γ 1 } should be zero. We can foresee at least two challenges to our identification strategy. First, states may have implemented other reforms that may also affect take-up (e.g. expanded outreach) concurrent with changes to claiming methods. Depending on the nature of the reform, omitted variable bias may over- or understate the true causal effect. A second problem is policy endogeneity. State administrators may adopt more automated claiming methods in response to higher anticipated demand placed on program resources due to higher anticipated take-up. If so, our estimates will be biased upwards. R R R V. RESULTS A. TAKE-UP Figure 4 provides a visual summary of our main findings on take-up. The figure plots the number of UI claimants per unemployed person from 1988 to 2003 for each event state along with the fraction of initial claimants that filed in-person. Vertical lines indicate the year a state first received more than 20% of UI claims remotely. From Figure 4, there does not appear to be a noticeable increase in take-up following the adoption of remote claiming procedures. To formalize this, Table 2 provides results from least squares estimation of Equation (1) with and without controls. Column (1) presents results from estimation with state and year fixed effects only. The change in take-up in the years leading up to and following remote claiming adoption are not significantly different from zero. Controlling for the unemployment rate and several characteristics of the unemployed (columns (2) and (3)) changes the point estimates very little and has no bearing on their statistical significance. Figure 5 plots the coefficients and 95% confidence intervals from the model with all controls. Though we find no statistically significant effects, we cannot rule out moderate effects of a few percentage point increase in take-up. B. COMPOSITIONAL EFFECTS An inconvenience explanation for low take-up also predicts that as the time cost of take-up is reduced, individuals with a higher time valuation or for whom benefits are less valuable will become more likely to participate. Micro data would be ideal for examining such heterogeneous effects, but is not readily available. Instead we note that heterogeneous effects would also shift the composition of UI claimants towards more wealthy (lower marginal utility of income) individuals. A wealthier claimant 7
8 population may have lower unemployment durations, higher weekly benefits, higher annual earnings, and be more likely to have graduated from college or be in an executive, professional, or specialized technical occupation. We examine each of these possibilities below. Figure 6 plots the average duration on unemployment insurance from 1988 to 2003 for each event state along with the fraction of initial claimants that filed in-person. Again, vertical lines indicate the year a state first received more than 20% of UI claims remotely. Average duration does decrease following the adoption of remote claiming procedures in many states, but not all. To formalize this, Table 3 provides results from least squares estimation of Equation (1) with average duration on UI as the dependent variable. In column (1), which controls for state and year effects only, coefficients on the post-event variables are all negative and statistically different from zero. Controlling for the unemployment rate and several characteristics of the unemployed (columns (2) and (3)) changes the point estimates very little, but does reduce their significance. One possible interpretation of the finding that average duration falls by about one half of a week when remote claiming is made available is that workers with short expected unemployment spells decide to claim unemployment insurance when it becomes easier to do so. Figure 7 plots the average weekly benefit amount (in 2003 Dollars) from 1988 to 2003 for each event state along with the fraction of initial claimants that filed in-person. Again, vertical lines indicate the year a state first received more than 20% of UI claims remotely. A clear visual pattern does not emerge from these graphs. Some states such as California, Maine, and Wisconsin saw a drop in average weekly benefits following their introduction of remote claiming methods, while others such as Kansas, Minnesota, and Vermont saw average benefit levels rise. To formalize this, Table 4 provides results from least squares estimation of Equation (1) with real average weekly benefit amount as the dependent variable. Column (1) controls for state and year effects only, while columns (2) and (3) also include controls for the unemployment rate and characteristics of unemployed workers, respectively. All three specifications result in negative and highly significant coefficients on all seven remote claiming variables. The significant coefficients on the pre-event indicator variables suggest the presence of an unobserved time-variant factor that is correlated with both timing of remote claiming implementation and average weekly benefit amount. We have not yet examined this anomalous result further. Our final approach to examine compositional shifts is to look at the characteristics of people who claimed to have received unemployment compensation at some time in the previous calendar year, from the March CPS. Figure 8 plots the share of UI recipients (as self-reported in the CPS) that have a college degree and that are typically in an executive, professional, or specialized technical occupation from 1988 to 2003 for each event state (using the left axis, denoted with triangles and circles respectively). On the same graph, we also plot the average real annual wage and salary earnings for the same group of individuals (right hand axis, denoted with squares). Again, vertical lines indicate the year a state first 8
9 received more than 20% of UI claims remotely. All three series are quite noisy due to limited sample size, but several patterns do emerge. The fraction of UI recipients with college degrees or in highly skilled occupations does appear to have grown over time in many states, but this does not appear to be associated implementation of remote claiming technology. Average real wages have also grown, but this does appear to coincide with the adoption of remote claiming. To formalize this, Table 5 provides results from least squares estimation of Equation (1) with these three characteristics of UI recipients as dependent variables. All three specifications include fixed state and year effects and controls for the unemployment rate and characteristics of unemployed workers. Economic changes that shift the pool of unemployed workers who could potentially claim UI are controlled for. We find no evidence of a shift in UI claimants towards the college-educated or workers in highly skilled occupations coinciding with remote claiming. We do, however, observe a statistically significant $1,600 increase in the average annual earnings of UI recipients. This is suggestive of an increased take-up rate for wealthier individuals, as easier and less time-intensive UI filing options became available. VI. CONCLUSIONS This preliminary analysis suggests that the adoption of remote forms of UI claiming (e.g. phone, mail, Internet) did not have an appreciable impact on one rough measure of UI take-up, the claimant to unemployed ratio. At face value, this finding is inconsistent with a time- and transaction-cost explanation for low take-up if remote UI claiming is indeed less time-intensive, as claimant surveys suggest. However, our estimates are sufficiently imprecise such that we cannot rule out moderate effects of a few percentage point increase in take-up rates. Large to moderate effects for a small population of marginal claimants may not show up in state aggregate take-up rates. This possibility underscores the importance of testing for heterogeneous effects. The evidence on whether claimant characteristics changed with the advent of remote claiming is weak. We find that the average UI benefit duration of claimants fell while their average real earnings increased, but the share of college graduates or workers in highly skilled occupations did not change. We could not identify the effect on average weekly benefit amount because our identification assumption does not appear to hold. Future analysis should test for heterogeneous effects directly using individual-level micro data with imputed UI eligibility. 9
10 REFERENCES Anderson, Patricia M. and Bruce D. Meyer, Unemployment Insurance Takeup Rates and the After-Tax Value of Benefits. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, August Blank, Rebecca M. and David E. Card, Recent Trends in Insured and Uninsured Unemployment: Is There an Explanation? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, November Currie, Janet, The Take-Up of Social Benefits. NBER Working Paper National Bureau of Economic Research, May Marcus, Steven S., and Joseph W. Frees, US Department of Labor Unemployment Insurance Claimant Satisfaction Study. Prepared for the US Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance Service. Portland, OR: Bardsley and Neidhart, Inc. September Needles, Karen, Walter Corson, Tim Meier, Ira Harley, and Karen Blass, Evaluation of the Impact of Telephone Initial Claims Filing. Report submitted to the US Department of Labor and the National UI Information Technology Support Center. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. March Vroman, Wayne, Low Benefit Recipiency in State Unemployment Insurance Programs. Prepared for the US Department of Labor. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. June Storer, Paul and Marc A. Van Audenrode, Unemployment insurance take-up rates in Canada: facts, determinants, and implications. Canadian Journal of Economics, November
11 Figure 1: UI Take-Up and Initial Claiming Method In Colorado Initial UI Claims per Unemployed Person Fraction Filing in-person 11
12 Figure 2: Characteristics of UI Claimants In Colorado Real Wage and Salary Earnings Exec, Prof, Tech Occupation Have College Degree 12 Fraction of UI Recipients 2003 Dollars
13 Figure 3: Method Used to File Initial UI Claims Figure 2: Method Used To Claim Unemployment Insurance Person Phone Other Method Internet Year 13 Fraction of All Claims
14 Figure 4: UI Take-up and Fraction of Claims Filed In-Person 14
15 Figure 5: Regression-Adjusted Effect of Remote Claiming on UI Take-up 95% CI Upper Bound Coefficient on Event Year Indicator 95% CI Lower Bound Years Since Remote Claiming Event Note: This graph plots the coefficients and 95% confidence intervals from Table 2, specification (3) 15
16 Figure 6: UI Duration and Fraction of Claims Filed In-Person 16
17 Figure 7: Average Weekly Benefit Amount and Fraction of Claims Filed In-Person 17
18 Figure 8: Selected Characteristics of UI Recipients 18
19 TABLE 1: SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS OF EARLY PHONE CLAIMING IMPLEMENTATION Dates of Implementation Colorado Maine Massachusetts Missouri Montana Utah Wisconsin A: Selected Characteristics of Implementation April 1991 April 1997 July 1997 February 1996 November 1996 November 1996 October 1997 October 1996 October 1997 April 1997 August 1997 May 1995 January 1996 Main Motivation Reduce costs Reduce costs Reduce costs, response to privatized employment service Reduce costs, relieve office space pressure Improve training, reduce costs Improve customer service, reduce costs Reduce costs, improve customer service Closed local offices? Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Toll-free number? Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Use Interactive Voice Minimal Extensive Extensive Extensive Minimal Extensive Extensive Response System? B: Fraction of Claims Filed in Person Denotes year that state first received more than twenty percent of its initial UI claims remotely. This is the event indicator used in the analysis that follows. Source: Panel A is adapted from Needles et. al., (2000), Table 2-1. Panel B is from author s calculations of data from the U.S. Department of Labor Benefit Accuracy Management program. 19
20 TABLE 2: TAKE-UP Dependent Variable: Initial UI Claims per Unemployed Person (1) (2) (3) Time relative to event year 3 years before (0.020) (0.020) (0.020) 2 years before (0.018) (0.017) (0.017) 1 year before (0.020) (0.019) (0.020) Same year (0.023) (0.021) (0.021) 1 year after (0.026) (0.021) (0.022) 2 years after (0.031) (0.027) (0.024) 3 years after (0.029) (0.026) (0.026) Unemployment rate (0.612)** (0.606)** Characteristics of the unemployed Average age (0.001) Percent female (0.058)* Percent non-white (0.066) Percent with college degree (0.109) Average weeks looking for work (0.001) Percent in manufacturing or construction industry (0.058) Percent in executive, professional, or technical occupations (0.110) Average hourly wage (0.002) Average earnings in previous year (0.000) Average weeks worked in previous year (0.002)* State dummy Yes Yes Yes Year dummy Yes Yes Yes Observations R-squared Notes: All specifications are estimated with 21 Event states and 12 Control states (including the District of Columbia). Specifications (1) and (2) are estimated over the years 1988 through 2003, while specification (3) is estimated over the years 1989 through Robust standard errors in parentheses * significant at 5%; ** significant at 1% 20
21 TABLE 3: AVERAGE DURATION ON UI Dependent Variable: Average Weeks Receiving UI (1) (2) (3) Time relative to event year 3 years before (0.161) (0.150) (0.154) 2 years before (0.148) (0.134) (0.122)* 1 year before (0.174) (0.155) (0.157) Same year (0.199) (0.168) (0.170) 1 year after (0.273)* (0.250) (0.240) 2 years after (0.245)** (0.220)** (0.207)** 3 years after (0.206)* (0.177)* (0.189) Unemployment rate (4.611)** (5.240)** Characteristics of the unemployed Average age (0.011) Percent female (0.559) Percent non-white (0.519) Percent with college degree (0.866) Average weeks looking for work (0.011)** Percent in manufacturing or construction industry (0.526)* Percent in executive, professional, or technical occupations (0.774) Average hourly wage (0.006) Average earnings in previous year (0.000) Average weeks worked in previous year (0.014) State dummy Yes Yes Yes Year dummy Yes Yes Yes Observations R-squared Notes: All specifications are estimated with 21 Event states and 12 Control states (including the District of Columbia). Specifications (1) and (2) are estimated over the years 1988 through 2003, while specification (3) is estimated over the years 1989 through Robust standard errors in parentheses * significant at 5%; ** significant at 1% 21
22 TABLE 4: REAL AVERAGE WEEKLY BENEFITS Dependent Variable: Real Average Weekly Benefits, in 2003 Dollars (1) (2) (3) Time relative to event year 3 years before (2.220)** (2.284)** (2.320)** 2 years before (2.528)** (2.591)** (2.520)** 1 year before (2.653)** (2.660)** (2.628)** Same year (2.826)** (2.816)** (2.895)** 1 year after (3.643)** (3.658)** (3.614)** 2 years after (3.466)** (3.394)** (3.418)** 3 years after (3.644)** (3.537)** (3.683)** Unemployment rate (87.221)** (88.779)** Characteristics of the unemployed Average age (0.183) Percent female (8.198) Percent non-white (8.849) Percent with college degree (13.786) Average weeks looking for work (0.172) Percent in manufacturing or construction industry (9.587) Percent in executive, professional, or technical occupations (15.163) Average hourly wage (0.138) Average earnings in previous year (0.000) Average weeks worked in previous year (0.210) State dummy Yes Yes Yes Year dummy Yes Yes Yes Observations R-squared Notes: All specifications are estimated with 21 Event states and 12 Control states (including the District of Columbia). Specifications (1) and (2) are estimated over the years 1988 through 2003, while specification (3) is estimated over the years 1989 through Robust standard errors in parentheses * significant at 5%; ** significant at 1% 22
23 TABLE 5: CHARACTERISTICS OF UI RECIPIENTS Time relative to event year 3 years before (0.014) 2 years before (0.016) 1 year before (0.015) Same year (0.013) 1 year after (0.017) 2 years after (0.018) 3 years after (0.016) Dependent Variable: Characteristics of individuals receiving UI at any time during year Percent with college degree Percent in exec, prof, tech occ Average earnings during year UI was received (1) (2) (3) (0.021) (0.021) (0.014) (0.013) (0.015) (0.013) (0.015) 896 (984) 1,292 (699) -58 (755) 10 (684) 1,674 (850)* 683 (844) 1,669 (831)* Unemployment rate (0.492) (0.417) -62,361 (20,018)** Characteristics of the unemployed Average age (0.001) (0.001) (52.6) Percent female (0.039) (0.042) 1,877 (1,994) Percent non-white (0.048) (0.051) -4,564 (2,599) Percent with college degree (0.078) (0.080) 4,248 (3,663) Average weeks looking for work (0.001) (0.001) 79.4 (51.1) Percent in manufacturing or construction industry (0.050) (0.047) -2,374 (2,257) Percent in executive, professional, or technical occupations (0.076) (0.072) -12,685 (3,874)** Average hourly wage (0.001) (0.001) 15.6 (26.6) Average earnings in previous year (0.000) (0.000) (0.080) Average weeks worked in previous year (0.001) (0.002) (70.1) State dummy Yes Yes Yes Year dummy Yes Yes Yes Observations R-squared Notes: All specifications are estimated with 21 Event states and 12 Control states (including the District of Columbia). Specifications (1) and (2) are estimated over the years 1988 through 2003, while specification (3) is estimated over the years 1989 through Robust standard errors in parentheses * significant at 5%; ** significant at 1% 23
24 24
FRBSF ECONOMIC LETTER
FRBSF ECONOMIC LETTER 2009-28 September 8, 2009 New Highs in Unemployment Insurance Claims BY AISLING CLEARY, JOYCE KWOK, AND ROB VALLETTA Unemployment insurance benefits have been on an upward trend over
More informationThe Effects of Increasing the Early Retirement Age on Social Security Claims and Job Exits
The Effects of Increasing the Early Retirement Age on Social Security Claims and Job Exits Day Manoli UCLA Andrea Weber University of Mannheim February 29, 2012 Abstract This paper presents empirical evidence
More informationThe Impact of a $15 Minimum Wage on Hunger in America
The Impact of a $15 Minimum Wage on Hunger in America Appendix A: Theoretical Model SEPTEMBER 1, 2016 WILLIAM M. RODGERS III Since I only observe the outcome of whether the household nutritional level
More informationNew Jersey Public-Private Sector Wage Differentials: 1970 to William M. Rodgers III. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development
New Jersey Public-Private Sector Wage Differentials: 1970 to 2004 1 William M. Rodgers III Heldrich Center for Workforce Development Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy November 2006 EXECUTIVE
More informationAverage Earnings and Long-Term Mortality: Evidence from Administrative Data
American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings 2009, 99:2, 133 138 http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/aer.99.2.133 Average Earnings and Long-Term Mortality: Evidence from Administrative Data
More informationMarch Karen Cunnyngham Amang Sukasih Laura Castner
Empirical Bayes Shrinkage Estimates of State Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Participation Rates in 2009-2011 for All Eligible People and the Working Poor March 2014 Karen Cunnyngham Amang Sukasih
More informationLeft Out of the Boom Economy: UI Recipients in the Late 1990s
Contract No.: M-7042-8-00-97-30 MPR Reference No.: 8573 Left Out of the Boom Economy: UI Recipients in the Late 1990s Executive Summary October 2001 Karen Needels Walter Corson Walter Nicholson Submitted
More informationState-Level Estimates of Union Density, 1964 to Present
DATA WATCH State-Level Estimates of Union Density, 1964 to Present Barry T. Hirsch Department of Economics Trinity University 715 Stadium Drive San Antonio, Texas 78212-7200 Voice: (210)999-8112 Fax: (210)999-7255
More informationGender Differences in the Labor Market Effects of the Dollar
Gender Differences in the Labor Market Effects of the Dollar Linda Goldberg and Joseph Tracy Federal Reserve Bank of New York and NBER April 2001 Abstract Although the dollar has been shown to influence
More informationDo Domestic Chinese Firms Benefit from Foreign Direct Investment?
Do Domestic Chinese Firms Benefit from Foreign Direct Investment? Chang-Tai Hsieh, University of California Working Paper Series Vol. 2006-30 December 2006 The views expressed in this publication are those
More informationIncome Inequality and Household Labor: Online Appendicies
Income Inequality and Household Labor: Online Appendicies Daniel Schneider UC Berkeley Department of Sociology Orestes P. Hastings Colorado State University Department of Sociology Daniel Schneider (Corresponding
More informationContemporaneous and Long-Term Effects of CHIP Eligibility Expansions on SSI Enrollment
Contemporaneous and Long-Term Effects of CHIP Eligibility Expansions on SSI Enrollment Michael Levere Mathematica Policy Research Sean Orzol Mathematica Policy Research Lindsey Leininger Mathematica Policy
More informationEvaluating Pooled Evidence from the Reemployment Bonus Experiments
Upjohn Institute Working Papers Upjohn Research home page 1994 Evaluating Pooled Evidence from the Reemployment Bonus Experiments Paul T. Decker Mathematica Policy Research Christopher J. O'Leary W.E.
More informationSources of Health Insurance Coverage in Georgia
Sources of Health Insurance Coverage in Georgia 2007-2008 Tabulations of the March 2008 Annual Social and Economic Supplement to the Current Population Survey and The 2008 Georgia Population Survey William
More informationUnemployment Insurance Primer: Understanding What s At Stake as Congress Reopens Stimulus Package Debate. Wayne Vroman January 2002
Unemployment Insurance Primer: Understanding What s At Stake as Congress Reopens Stimulus Package Debate Wayne Vroman January 2002 With the economy in recession, President Bush is asking (has asked) Congress
More informationTHE CONTINGENT WORKFORCE
23 THE CONTINGENT WORKFORCE Christopher J. Surfield, Lander University ABSTRACT The perceived increase in the use of contingent work arrangements, such as consulting, contracting, and temporary employment,
More informationOutput and Unemployment
o k u n s l a w 4 The Regional Economist October 2013 Output and Unemployment How Do They Relate Today? By Michael T. Owyang, Tatevik Sekhposyan and E. Katarina Vermann Potential output measures the productive
More informationDoes It Pay to Move from Welfare to Work? Reply to Robert Moffitt and Katie Winder
Does It Pay to Move from Welfare to Work? Reply to Robert Moffitt and Katie Winder Sheldon Danziger Hui-Chen Wang The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 ended the entitlement
More informationObesity, Disability, and Movement onto the DI Rolls
Obesity, Disability, and Movement onto the DI Rolls John Cawley Cornell University Richard V. Burkhauser Cornell University Prepared for the Sixth Annual Conference of Retirement Research Consortium The
More informationFirm Manipulation and Take-up Rate of a 30 Percent. Temporary Corporate Income Tax Cut in Vietnam
Firm Manipulation and Take-up Rate of a 30 Percent Temporary Corporate Income Tax Cut in Vietnam Anh Pham June 3, 2015 Abstract This paper documents firm take-up rates and manipulation around the eligibility
More informationSupplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participation during the economic recovery of 2003 to 2007
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participation during the economic recovery of 2003 to 2007 Janna Johnson Janna Johnson is a graduate student in Public Policy at the Harris School, University
More informationThe Persistent Effect of Temporary Affirmative Action: Online Appendix
The Persistent Effect of Temporary Affirmative Action: Online Appendix Conrad Miller Contents A Extensions and Robustness Checks 2 A. Heterogeneity by Employer Size.............................. 2 A.2
More informationMINIMUM WAGE WORKERS IN HAWAII 2013
WEST INFORMATION OFFICE San Francisco, Calif. For release Wednesday, June 25, 2014 14-898-SAN Technical information: (415) 625-2282 BLSInfoSF@bls.gov www.bls.gov/ro9 Media contact: (415) 625-2270 MINIMUM
More informationThe Interaction of Workforce Development Programs and Unemployment Compensation by Individuals with Disabilities in Washington State
External Papers and Reports Upjohn Research home page 2011 The Interaction of Workforce Development Programs and Unemployment Compensation by Individuals with Disabilities in Washington State Kevin Hollenbeck
More informationThe Unions of the States
The Unions of the States John Schmitt February 2010 Center for Economic and Policy Research 1611 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20009 202-293-5380 www.cepr.net CEPR The Unions of the
More informationUnemployment Insurance Benefits
C E N T E R O N L A B O R, H U M A N S E R V I C E S, A N D P O P U L A T I O N RE S E ARCH RE P O R T Unemployment Insurance Benefits Performance since the Great Recession Wayne Vroman February 2018 AB
More informationIssue Brief No Sources of Health Insurance and Characteristics of the Uninsured: Analysis of the March 2005 Current Population Survey
Issue Brief No. 287 Sources of Health Insurance and Characteristics of the Uninsured: Analysis of the March 2005 Current Population Survey by Paul Fronstin, EBRI November 2005 This Issue Brief provides
More informationBonus Impacts on Receipt of Unemployment Insurance
Upjohn Press Book Chapters Upjohn Research home page 2001 Bonus Impacts on Receipt of Unemployment Insurance Paul T. Decker Mathematica Policy Research Christopher J. O'Leary W.E. Upjohn Institute, oleary@upjohn.org
More informationEPI & CEPR Issue Brief
EPI & CEPR Issue Brief IB #205 ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE & CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND POLICY RESEARCH APRIL 14, 2005 FINDING THE BETTER FIT Receiving unemployment insurance increases likelihood of re-employment
More informationReemployment Bonuses, Unemployment Duration, and Job Match Quality
Reemployment Bonuses, Unemployment Duration, and Job Match Quality Taehyun Ahn School of Economics, Sogang University Seoul 121-742, Korea ahn83@sogang.ac.kr, tahn.83@gmail.com July 2016 ABSTRACT This
More informationThe Impact of Expanding Medicaid on Health Insurance Coverage and Labor Market Outcomes * David E. Frisvold and Younsoo Jung. April 15, 2016.
The Impact of Expanding Medicaid on Health Insurance Coverage and Labor Market Outcomes * David E. Frisvold and Younsoo Jung April 15, 2016 Abstract Expansions of public health insurance have the potential
More informationThe Effects of State Policy Design Features on Take-up and Crowd-out Rates for the State Children s Health Insurance Program
The Effects of State Policy Design Features on Take-up and Crowd-out Rates for the State Children s Health Insurance Program Cynthia Bansak Steven Raphael Abstract We evaluate the effects of state policy
More informationDid the Social Assistance Take-up Rate Change After EI Reform for Job Separators?
Did the Social Assistance Take-up Rate Change After EI for Job Separators? HRDC November 2001 Executive Summary Changes under EI reform, including changes to eligibility and length of entitlement, raise
More informationThe U.S. Gender Earnings Gap: A State- Level Analysis
The U.S. Gender Earnings Gap: A State- Level Analysis Christine L. Storrie November 2013 Abstract. Although the size of the earnings gap has decreased since women began entering the workforce in large
More information820 First Street, NE, Suite 510, Washington, DC Tel: Fax:
820 First Street, NE, Suite 510, Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org http://www.cbpp.org June 26, 2002 THE IMPORTANCE OF USING MOST RECENT WAGES TO DETERMINE UNEMPLOYMENT
More informationUsing Differences in Knowledge Across Neighborhoods to Uncover the Impacts of the EITC on Earnings
Using Differences in Knowledge Across Neighborhoods to Uncover the Impacts of the EITC on Earnings Raj Chetty, Harvard and NBER John N. Friedman, Harvard and NBER Emmanuel Saez, UC Berkeley and NBER April
More informationOnline Appendix to The Impact of Family Income on Child. Achievement: Evidence from the Earned Income Tax Credit.
Online Appendix to The Impact of Family Income on Child Achievement: Evidence from the Earned Income Tax Credit Gordon B. Dahl University of California, San Diego and NBER Lance Lochner University of Western
More informationState Minimum Wages: An Overview
Wages: An Overview David H. Bradley Specialist in Labor Economics January 2, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R43792 Wages: An Overview Summary The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA),
More informationChanges in the Experience-Earnings Pro le: Robustness
Changes in the Experience-Earnings Pro le: Robustness Online Appendix to Why Does Trend Growth A ect Equilibrium Employment? A New Explanation of an Old Puzzle, American Economic Review (forthcoming) Michael
More informationFIGURE I.1 / Per Capita Gross Domestic Product and Unemployment Rates. Year
FIGURE I.1 / Per Capita Gross Domestic Product and Unemployment Rates 40,000 12 Real GDP per Capita (Chained 2000 Dollars) 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 Real GDP per Capita Unemployment
More informationState Unemployment Insurance Tax Survey
444 N. Capitol Street NW, Suite 142, Washington, DC 20001 202-434-8020 fax 202-434-8033 www.workforceatm.org State Unemployment Insurance Tax Survey NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE WORKFORCE AGENCIES April
More informationThe impact of cigarette excise taxes on beer consumption
The impact of cigarette excise taxes on beer consumption Jeremy Cluchey Frank DiSilvestro PPS 313 18 April 2008 ABSTRACT This study attempts to determine what if any impact a state s decision to increase
More informationAdditional Evidence and Replication Code for Analyzing the Effects of Minimum Wage Increases Enacted During the Great Recession
ESSPRI Working Paper Series Paper #20173 Additional Evidence and Replication Code for Analyzing the Effects of Minimum Wage Increases Enacted During the Great Recession Economic Self-Sufficiency Policy
More informationThe Changing Incidence and Severity of Poverty Spells among Female-Headed Families
American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings 2008, 98:2, 387 391 http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/aer.98.2.387 The Changing Incidence and Severity of Poverty Spells among Female-Headed
More informationEstimating the Number of People in Poverty for the Program Access Index: The American Community Survey vs. the Current Population Survey.
Background Estimating the Number of People in Poverty for the Program Access Index: The American Community Survey vs. the Current Population Survey August 2006 The Program Access Index (PAI) is one of
More informationThe Role of Unemployment in the Rise in Alternative Work Arrangements. Lawrence F. Katz and Alan B. Krueger* 1 December 31, 2016
The Role of Unemployment in the Rise in Alternative Work Arrangements Lawrence F. Katz and Alan B. Krueger* 1 December 31, 2016 Much evidence indicates that the traditional 9-to-5 employee-employer relationship
More information820 First Street, NE, Suite 510, Washington, DC Tel: Fax:
820 First Street, NE, Suite 510, Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1080 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org Revised September 19, 2002 NUMBER OF WORKERS EXHAUSTING FEDERAL UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
More informationTHE EMPLOYMENT SITUATION: SEPTEMBER 2000
Internet address: http://stats.bls.gov/newsrels.htm Technical information: USDL 00-284 Household data: (202) 691-6378 Transmission of material in this release is Establishment data: 691-6555 embargoed
More informationHistorical Trends in the Degree of Federal Income Tax Progressivity in the United States
Kennesaw State University DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University Faculty Publications 5-14-2012 Historical Trends in the Degree of Federal Income Tax Progressivity in the United States Timothy Mathews
More informationDiscussion of The Role of Expectations in Inflation Dynamics
Discussion of The Role of Expectations in Inflation Dynamics James H. Stock Department of Economics, Harvard University and the NBER 1. Introduction Rational expectations are at the heart of the dynamic
More informationAlternate Specifications
A Alternate Specifications As described in the text, roughly twenty percent of the sample was dropped because of a discrepancy between eligibility as determined by the AHRQ, and eligibility according to
More informationFigure 1a: Wage Distribution Density Estimates: Men, Minimum Minimum 0.60 Density
Figure 1a: Wage Distribution Density Estimates: Men, 1979-1989 0.90 0.80 1979 1989 1979 Minimum 0.70 1989 Minimum 0.60 Density 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00-1.75-1.50-1.25-1.00-0.75-0.50-0.25 0.00 0.25
More informationLabor Market Protections and Unemployment: Does the IMF Have a Case? Dean Baker and John Schmitt 1. November 3, 2003
cepr Center for Economic and Policy Research Briefing Paper Labor Market Protections and Unemployment: Does the IMF Have a Case? Dean Baker and John Schmitt 1 November 3, 2003 CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND POLICY
More informationFinal Report on MAPPR Project: The Detroit Living Wage Ordinance: Will it Reduce Urban Poverty? David Neumark May 30, 2001
Final Report on MAPPR Project: The Detroit Living Wage Ordinance: Will it Reduce Urban Poverty? David Neumark May 30, 2001 Detroit s Living Wage Ordinance The Detroit Living Wage Ordinance passed in the
More informationWikiLeaks Document Release
WikiLeaks Document Release February 2, 2009 Congressional Research Service Report RL32598 TANF Cash Benefits as of January 1, 2004 Meridith Walters, Gene Balk, and Vee Burke, Domestic Social Policy Division
More informationFew public policy issues receive greater attention than the
Impact of the Earned Income Tax Credit on Health Insurance Coverage Evaluating the Impact of the Earned Income Tax Credit on Health Insurance Coverage Abstract - The goals and design of the Earned Income
More informationThe Role of Exponential-Growth Bias and Present Bias in Retirment Saving Decisions
The Role of Exponential-Growth Bias and Present Bias in Retirment Saving Decisions Gopi Shah Goda Stanford University & NBER Matthew Levy London School of Economics Colleen Flaherty Manchester University
More informationGOVERNMENT TAXES ITS PEOPLE TO FINANCE
REGRESSIVE STATE TAX SYSTEMS: FACTS, SEVERAL POSSIBLE EXPLANATIONS, AND EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE* Zhiyong An, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing, China INTRODUCTION GOVERNMENT TAXES ITS PEOPLE
More informationPhase-Out of Federal Unemployment Insurance
National Employment Law Project Phase-Out of Federal Unemployment Insurance FACT SHEET June 2012 As of June 2012, 24 states will no longer qualify for a portion of benefits under the federal Emergency
More informationDo Alternative Base Periods Increase Unemployment Insurance Receipt Among Low-Educated Unemployed Workers?
Do Alternative Base Periods Increase Unemployment Insurance Receipt Among Low-Educated Unemployed Workers? Alix Gould-Werth H. Luke Shaefer Abstract Unemployment Insurance (UI) is the major social insurance
More informationOnline Appendix from Bönke, Corneo and Lüthen Lifetime Earnings Inequality in Germany
Online Appendix from Bönke, Corneo and Lüthen Lifetime Earnings Inequality in Germany Contents Appendix I: Data... 2 I.1 Earnings concept... 2 I.2 Imputation of top-coded earnings... 5 I.3 Correction of
More informationAugmenting Okun s Law with Earnings and the Unemployment Puzzle of 2011
Augmenting Okun s Law with Earnings and the Unemployment Puzzle of 2011 Kurt G. Lunsford University of Wisconsin Madison January 2013 Abstract I propose an augmented version of Okun s law that regresses
More informationDeteriorating Health Insurance Coverage from 2000 to 2010: Coverage Takes the Biggest Hit in the South and Midwest
ACA Implementation Monitoring and Tracking Deteriorating Health Insurance Coverage from 2000 to 2010: Coverage Takes the Biggest Hit in the South and Midwest August 2012 Fredric Blavin, John Holahan, Genevieve
More informationRuhm, C. (1991). Are Workers Permanently Scarred by Job Displacements? The American Economic Review, Vol. 81(1):
Are Workers Permanently Scarred by Job Displacements? By: Christopher J. Ruhm Ruhm, C. (1991). Are Workers Permanently Scarred by Job Displacements? The American Economic Review, Vol. 81(1): 319-324. Made
More informationOnline Appendix for: Consumption Reponses to In-Kind Transfers: Evidence from the Introduction of the Food Stamp Program
Online Appendix for: Consumption Reponses to In-Kind Transfers: Evidence from the Introduction of the Food Stamp Program Hilary W. Hoynes University of California, Davis and NBER hwhoynes@ucdavis.edu and
More informationThe Effects of Reducing the Entitlement Period to Unemployment Insurance
The Effects of Reducing the Entitlement Period to Unemployment Insurance Benefits Nynke de Groot Bas van der Klaauw July 14, 2014 Abstract This paper exploits a substantial reform of the Dutch UI law to
More informationCommentary. Thomas MaCurdy. Description of the Proposed Earnings-Supplement Program
Thomas MaCurdy Commentary I n their paper, Philip Robins and Charles Michalopoulos project the impacts of an earnings-supplement program modeled after Canada s Self-Sufficiency Project (SSP). 1 The distinguishing
More informationA Rising Tide Lifts All Boats? IT growth in the US over the last 30 years
A Rising Tide Lifts All Boats? IT growth in the US over the last 30 years Nicholas Bloom (Stanford) and Nicola Pierri (Stanford)1 March 25 th 2017 1) Executive Summary Using a new survey of IT usage from
More informationUnemployment Insurance: Consequences of Changes in State Unemployment Compensation Laws
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Federal Publications Key Workplace Documents 10-30-2013 Unemployment Insurance: Consequences of Changes in State Unemployment Compensation Laws Katelin
More informationMontana State Planning Grant A Big Sky Opportunity to Expand Health Insurance Coverage. Interim Report
Montana State Planning Grant A Big Sky Opportunity to Expand Health Insurance Coverage Interim Report Submitted to Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) U.S. Department of Health and Human
More informationComment on Gary V. Englehardt and Jonathan Gruber Social Security and the Evolution of Elderly Poverty
Comment on Gary V. Englehardt and Jonathan Gruber Social Security and the Evolution of Elderly Poverty David Card Department of Economics, UC Berkeley June 2004 *Prepared for the Berkeley Symposium on
More informationState-Level Trends in Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance
June 2011 State-Level Trends in Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance A STATE-BY-STATE ANALYSIS Executive Summary This report examines state-level trends in employer-sponsored insurance (ESI) and the factors
More informationFull Web Appendix: How Financial Incentives Induce Disability Insurance. Recipients to Return to Work. by Andreas Ravndal Kostøl and Magne Mogstad
Full Web Appendix: How Financial Incentives Induce Disability Insurance Recipients to Return to Work by Andreas Ravndal Kostøl and Magne Mogstad A Tables and Figures Table A.1: Characteristics of DI recipients
More informationYES, FEDERAL UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS SHOULD BE TEMPORARY BUT NO, THE PROGRAM SHOULDN T BE ENDED YET. by Isaac Shapiro and Jessica Goldberg
820 First Street, NE, Suite 510, Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org May 21, 2003 YES, FEDERAL UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS SHOULD BE TEMPORARY BUT NO, THE PROGRAM
More informationCharacteristics of Low-Wage Workers and Their Labor Market Experiences: Evidence from the Mid- to Late 1990s
Contract No.: 282-98-002; Task Order 34 MPR Reference No.: 8915-600 Characteristics of Low-Wage Workers and Their Labor Market Experiences: Evidence from the Mid- to Late 1990s Final Report April 30, 2004
More informationTHE EFFECT OF SIMPLIFIED REPORTING ON FOOD STAMP PAYMENT ACCURACY
THE EFFECT OF SIMPLIFIED REPORTING ON FOOD STAMP PAYMENT ACCURACY Page 1 Office of Analysis, Nutrition and Evaluation October 2005 Summary One of the more widely adopted State options allowed by the 2002
More informationCOMPARING RECENT DECLINES IN OREGON'S CASH ASSISTANCE CASELOAD WITH TRENDS IN THE POVERTY POPULATION
COMPARING RECENT DECLINES IN OREGON'S CASH ASSISTANCE CASELOAD WITH TRENDS IN THE POVERTY POPULATION Prepared for: The Oregon Center for Public Policy P.O. Box 7 Silverton, Oregon 97381 (503) 873-1201
More informationThis article was originally published in a journal published by Elsevier, and the attached copy is provided by Elsevier for the author s benefit and for the benefit of the author s institution, for non-commercial
More informationRetirement. Optimal Asset Allocation in Retirement: A Downside Risk Perspective. JUne W. Van Harlow, Ph.D., CFA Director of Research ABSTRACT
Putnam Institute JUne 2011 Optimal Asset Allocation in : A Downside Perspective W. Van Harlow, Ph.D., CFA Director of Research ABSTRACT Once an individual has retired, asset allocation becomes a critical
More informationFebruary 2018 QUARTERLY CONSUMER CREDIT TRENDS. Public Records
February 2018 QUARTERLY CONSUMER CREDIT TRENDS Public Records p Jasper Clarkberg p Michelle Kambara This is part of a series of quarterly reports on consumer credit trends produced by the Consumer Financial
More informationDoes Raising Contribution Limits Lead to More Saving? Evidence from the Catch-up Limit Reform
Does Raising Contribution Limits Lead to More Saving? Evidence from the Catch-up Limit Reform Adam M. Lavecchia University of Toronto National Tax Association 107 th Annual Conference on Taxation Adam
More informationThe unemployment insurance (UI)
Unemployment Insurance Benefits Unemployment insurance recipients and nonrecipients in the CPS Data from unemployment insurance supplements to the Current Population Survey show that the percentages of
More informationDesign of the Worker Profiling and Reemployment Services System and Evaluation in Michigan
Upjohn Institute Working Papers Upjohn Research home page 996 Design of the Worker Profiling and Reemployment Services System and Evaluation in Michigan Randall W. Eberts W.E. Upjohn Institute, eberts@upjohn.org
More informationAssessing Systematic Differences in Industry-Award Rates of Social Security Disability Insurance
Assessing Systematic Differences in Industry-Award Rates of Social Security Disability Insurance Till von Wachter * University of California Los Angeles and NBER Abstract: Although a large body of literature
More informationHeterogeneity in the Impact of Economic Cycles and the Great Recession: Effects Within and Across the Income Distribution
Heterogeneity in the Impact of Economic Cycles and the Great Recession: Effects Within and Across the Income Distribution Marianne Bitler Department of Economics, UC Irvine and NBER mbitler@uci.edu Hilary
More informationElectronic Supplementary Material for the Article: The Impact of Internet Diffusion on Marriage Rates: Evidence from the Broadband Market
Electronic Supplementary Material for the Article: The Impact of Internet Diffusion on Marriage Rates: Evidence from the Broadband Market By Andriana Bellou 1 Appendix A. Data Definitions and Sources This
More informationkaiser medicaid and the uninsured commission on An Overview of Changes in the Federal Medical Assistance Percentages (FMAPs) for Medicaid July 2011
P O L I C Y B R I E F kaiser commission on medicaid and the uninsured July 2011 An Overview of Changes in the Federal Medical Assistance Percentages (FMAPs) for Medicaid Executive Summary Medicaid, which
More informationApril 20, and More After That, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, March 27, First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002
820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org April 20, 2012 WHAT IF CHAIRMAN RYAN S MEDICAID BLOCK GRANT HAD TAKEN EFFECT IN 2001?
More informationLabor Force Participation in New England vs. the United States, : Why Was the Regional Decline More Moderate?
No. 16-2 Labor Force Participation in New England vs. the United States, 2007 2015: Why Was the Regional Decline More Moderate? Mary A. Burke Abstract: This paper identifies the main forces that contributed
More informationExplaining procyclical male female wage gaps B
Economics Letters 88 (2005) 231 235 www.elsevier.com/locate/econbase Explaining procyclical male female wage gaps B Seonyoung Park, Donggyun ShinT Department of Economics, Hanyang University, Seoul 133-791,
More informationWage Scars and Human Capital Theory: Appendix
Wage Scars and Human Capital Theory: Appendix Justin Barnette and Amanda Michaud Kent State University and Indiana University October 2, 2017 Abstract A large literature shows workers who are involuntarily
More informationLABOR SUPPLY RESPONSES TO TAXES AND TRANSFERS: PART I (BASIC APPROACHES) Henrik Jacobsen Kleven London School of Economics
LABOR SUPPLY RESPONSES TO TAXES AND TRANSFERS: PART I (BASIC APPROACHES) Henrik Jacobsen Kleven London School of Economics Lecture Notes for MSc Public Finance (EC426): Lent 2013 AGENDA Efficiency cost
More information1. Introduction to Macroeconomics
Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University 1. Introduction to Macroeconomics E212 Macroeconomics Prof George Alogoskoufis The Scope of Macroeconomics Macroeconomics, deals with the determination
More information4 managerial workers) face a risk well below the average. About half of all those below the minimum wage are either commerce insurance and finance wor
4 managerial workers) face a risk well below the average. About half of all those below the minimum wage are either commerce insurance and finance workers, or service workers two categories holding less
More informationCLMS BRIEF 2 - Estimate of SUI Revenue, State-by-State
CLMS BRIEF 2 - Estimate of SUI Revenue, State-by-State Estimating the Annual Amounts of Unemployment Insurance Tax Collections From Individual States for Financing Adult Basic Education/ Job Training Programs
More informationHealth Status, Health Insurance, and Health Services Utilization: 2001
Health Status, Health Insurance, and Health Services Utilization: 2001 Household Economic Studies Issued February 2006 P70-106 This report presents health service utilization rates by economic and demographic
More informationOUTPUT SPILLOVERS FROM FISCAL POLICY
OUTPUT SPILLOVERS FROM FISCAL POLICY Alan J. Auerbach and Yuriy Gorodnichenko University of California, Berkeley January 2013 In this paper, we estimate the cross-country spillover effects of government
More information2016 Client Payroll Information Guide
2016 Client Payroll Information Guide 2 3 ACA Guidance-Notice to Employees of Coverage Options Positive Pay Clients State & Local Tax Forms DOL Delays Proposed FSLA Changes IN THIS ISSUE 4 State Minimum
More informationApril 2015 Forthcoming, American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings. Abstract
The Effect of Extended Unemployment Insurance Benefits: Evidence from the 2012-2013 Phase-Out Henry S. Farber Jesse Rothstein Robert G. Valletta Princeton University U.C. Berkeley FRB San Francisco April
More informationEconomists and Time Use Data
Economists and Time Use Data Harley Frazis Bureau of Labor Statistics Disclaimer: The views expressed here are not necessarily those of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. 1 Outline A Few Thoughts on Time
More information