Digging Deeper Into Deepwater Horizon
|
|
- Abraham Wheeler
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY Phone: Fax: Digging Deeper Into Deepwater Horizon Law360, New York (May 31, 2013, 12:24 PM ET) -- In a wakeup call to insurers and policyholders alike, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals recently extended additional insured coverage beyond the scope of liabilities assumed in an underlying service contract between the policyholder and an additional insured. The Fifth Circuit panel concluded that BP was an additional insured under Transocean s insurance policies with respect to subsurface pollution arising out of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, even though Transocean agreed to assume only liabilities arising from surface pollution and agreed to extend additional insured coverage to BP for liabilities assumed by [Transocean] under the terms of this Contract. The Fifth Circuit held that BP was an additional insured as to liabilities beyond those for which Transocean agreed to indemnify BP because the policies did not contain any limitation on additional insured coverage or incorporate limits from the underlying drilling contract. See In re Deepwater Horizon, 710 F.3d 338 (5th Cir. 2013). The Fifth Circuit should grant the unusual remedy of rehearing the case en banc and should vacate the panel decision. The most reasonable reading of the policies is that the insurers provided BP with additional insured coverage only for liabilities that Transocean assumed under the drilling contract that is, only for liabilities from surface pollution but not the subsurface pollution at issue in the Deepwater Horizon blowout. The Fifth Circuit panel based its decision on a Texas Supreme Court decision that is factually distinguishable and did not follow Fifth Circuit precedent supporting the insurers position. The decision could affect thousands of policies and drilling contracts in the heart of the U.S. oil and gas industry. In the wake of In re Deepwater Horizon, meanwhile, insurers and policyholders should consider expressly limiting additional insured coverage to the scope of liabilities assumed in underlying contracts. Digging Deeper Into In Re Deepwater Horizon Transocean and BP entered into a contract for exploratory drilling at the Macondo Well in the Gulf of Mexico. Under the drilling contract, Transocean assumed liability for surface pollution, while BP assumed liability for subsurface pollution. Transocean agreed to indemnify BP against losses arising from surface pollution. Likewise, BP agreed to indemnify Transocean from liabilities arising from subsurface pollution.
2 The contract required: Without limiting the indemnity obligation or liabilities of [Transocean] or its insurer, at all times during the term of this Contract, [Transocean] shall maintain insurance covering the operations to be performed under this Contract as set forth in Exhibit C. Exhibit C to the drilling contract required, in paragraph 1.c, that Transocean carry Comprehensive General Liability Insurance, including contractual liability insuring the indemnity agreement as set forth in the Contract. Exhibit C also required, in paragraph 3, that BP be named as an additional insured in each of [Transocean s] policies, except Workers Compensation for liabilities assumed by [Transocean] under the terms of this Contract. Transocean s insurance policies provided that the insurers agreed to pay for ultimate net loss by reason of liability assumed by the Insured under an Insured Contract. The policies defined insured as any person or entity to whom the Insured is obliged by written Insured Contract... to provide insurance such as is afforded by this Policy but only with respect to... liability arising out of operations conducted by the Named Insured or on their behalf. They defined insured contract as any contract entered into by the Insured and pertaining to business under which the Insured assumes the tort liability of another party to pay for... Property Damage... to a Third Party. A general condition of the policies was that the insurers agree where required by written contract [that] additional insureds are automatically included hereunder. The policies were governed by Texas law. The Deepwater Horizon Blowout In April 2010, Transocean s Deepwater Horizon offshore drilling platform exploded and sank, resulting in the spilling of millions of gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico. BP claimed additional insured coverage under Transocean s insurance policies following the blowout. BP argued that it was entitled to additional insured coverage beyond the scope of Transocean s contractual indemnity of BP (since Transocean indemnified BP only for liabilities from surface pollution, while the liabilities at issue stemmed from subsurface pollution). Transocean s insurers sought a declaratory judgment that they had no additional insured obligations to BP. The insurers argued that additional insured coverage was limited to the scope of liabilities that Transocean assumed and as to which Transocean indemnified BP under the underlying drilling contract. The Fifth Circuit ruled that BP was an additional insured under the policies. It relied on Texas Supreme Court precedent to conclude that the insurance policies, and not the indemnity provisions of the drilling contract, governed whether BP was an additional insured. It concluded that the policies did not contain any limitation on additional insured coverage or incorporate any limits from the underlying drilling contract, as long as the insurance provision and the indemnity provision in the drilling contract were separate and independent. An exhibit to the drilling contract required, in one paragraph, that Transocean obtain insurance coverage for its contractual liabilities. The same exhibit, in a separate paragraph, required that BP be named as an additional insured in Transocean s policies.
3 The court concluded that the insurance provision and the indemnity provision in the drilling contract were separate and independent. It therefore held that the additional insured coverage was not limited by the scope of Transocean s contractual indemnity to BP, and thus, BP was an additional insured. Why the Fifth Circuit Should Grant En Banc Review and Vacate the Panel Decision The policies afford BP additional insured coverage only for liabilities assumed by Transocean for which Transocean provided indemnity to BP in the drilling contract. The drilling contract required that Transocean insure the indemnity agreement as set forth in the drilling contract. It required that BP be named as an additional insured in each of [Transocean s] policies, except Workers Compensation for liabilities assumed by [Transocean] under the terms of this Contract. Transocean agreed to indemnify BP against losses arising from surface pollution but not subsurface pollution. The drilling contract thus required Transocean to provide additional insured coverage to BP for liabilities assumed by Transocean and as to which Transocean indemnified BP, namely, for surface pollution, but not subsurface pollution. The policies, in turn, insured against liability assumed by an insured under an insured contract, defined as any contract under which the Insured assumes the tort liability of another party to pay for... Property Damage... to a Third Party. The insurers agreed to add additional insureds where required by written contract. The most reasonable interpretation of these provisions is that BP was an additional insured only for liabilities assumed by Transocean under the terms of the drilling contract. In a belt and suspenders approach, the policies and the drilling contract provided coextensive additional insured and indemnity coverage to BP. Read reasonably, BP was an additional insured only to the extent that Transocean assumed such liabilities in the underlying drilling contract. After all, drilling contracts are designed to provide an operator with rigs and crews, not with insurance coverage for its own risks. The Texas Supreme Court s decision on which the Fifth Circuit relied, Evanston Ins. Co. v. ATOFINA Petrochems. Inc., 256 S.W.3d 660 (Tex. 2008), did not compel a ruling that BP s additional insured coverage was broader than liabilities Transocean assumed in the drilling contract. In ATOFINA, the Texas Supreme Court held that a refinery owner was an additional insured under its contractor s insurance policies in connection with liabilities from a wrongful death lawsuit. The Fifth Circuit in Deepwater Horizon distilled from ATOFINA and the Fifth Circuit s decision in Aubris Resources LP v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 566 F.3d 483 (5th Cir. 2009), the principle that only the umbrella policy itself may establish limits upon the extent to which an additional insured is covered. In re Deepwater Horizon, 710 F.3d at 347. However, the Fifth Circuit incorrectly extended the rulings of ATOFINA and Aubris beyond the facts of those cases. First, the policy in ATOFINA did not refer to the underlying service contract. The policy in ATOFINA defined insured as a person or organization for whom you have agreed to provide insurance as is afforded by this policy. ATOFINA, 256 S.W.3d at 664.
4 By contrast, the Transocean policies defined insured as an entity to whom the insured was obliged by an insured contract to provide insurance. An insured contract was a contract under which Transocean assumes the tort liability of another party. The insurers agreed to add additional insureds only where required by written contract. The Transocean policies unlike the policy in ATOFINA required resort to the drilling contract to determine the scope of additional insured coverage. Second, the additional insured provision in Aubris was broader than the additional insured provision in the Deepwater Horizon drilling contract. The service contract in Aubris required that Aubris shall be named as additional insureds in each of Contractor s policies except Workers Compensation; however, such extension of coverage shall not apply with respect to any obligations for which United has specifically agreed to indemnify Contractor. Aubris, 566 F.3d at 487. The additional insured provision granted broad coverage with a limited exclusion, whereas the BP- Transocean drilling contract provided limited coverage only for liabilities assumed by [the policyholder] under the terms of this Contract. The court in Aubris concluded that a separately considered and extra-contractual decision was required for Aubris to specifically agree to indemnify the contractor and thus exclude additional insured coverage. Id. at 490. The court found additional insured coverage because there was no separate, specific indemnity agreement. Unlike the contract in Aubris, the BP-Transocean drilling contract s insurance provision referred to the drilling contract itself rather than to extra-contractual indemnities and therefore it permitted a court to consider the indemnity provision in determining additional insured coverage. The conclusion in ATOFINA and Aubris that the court must consider only the insurance policy, and not the service agreement, in determining the scope of additional insured coverage flowed directly from the language of the contracts in those cases. That rule, however, does not apply where the relevant contracts extend additional insured coverage for liabilities assumed by [the policyholder] under the terms of this Contract language which requires that the policies and the drilling contract be read together to determine coverage. Moreover, Fifth Circuit precedent permits courts to consider an underlying services contract in determining the scope of additional insured coverage under an insurance policy. In Becker v. Tidewater Inc., 586 F.3d 358, 370 (5th Cir. 2009), the insurance policy defined assured as a person the named assured was obligated by contract to name. The service agreement required Tidewater to name Becker as an additional insured but only with respect to the risks assumed by [Tidewater] in this Charter. The court held that the scope of coverage was limited to risks assumed by Tidewater under the underlying services contract. Id. at Limiting BP s additional insured coverage to liabilities Transocean assumed in the BP-Transocean drilling contract is therefore consistent with ATOFINA, with prior Fifth Circuit precedent and with the wellestablished principle that courts must give effect to the parties unambiguous agreement. Insurers and policyholders may nonetheless wish to ensure that service contracts and insurance policies expressly limit additional insured coverage to the scope of liabilities assumed in underlying contracts, where they desire, if only to confirm the plain meaning of such contracts and to avoid costly litigation.
5 For example, a form contract of the International Association of Drilling Contractors provides that a contractor shall name an operator as an additional insured under its policies of insurance but only to the extent of the indemnification obligations assumed herein. See IADC Daywork Drilling Contract 13. Similarly, insurers may wish to consider language limiting additional insured status to the extent that the named insured has assumed the additional insured s liability in a written insured contract. Insurers and policyholders should, of course, consult closely with counsel to draft effective language in light of the relevant contractual relationships and recent case law in the governing jurisdiction. Such language may confirm the plain meaning and intent of the contracts in In re Deepwater Horizon: that the insurers named additional insureds only to the extent of the liabilities assumed under the underlying services contract. --By Ethan V. Torrey, Choate Hall & Stewart LLP Ethan Torrey is a partner in the insurance and reinsurance practice group at Choate Hall & Stewart in Boston. The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the firm, its clients, or Portfolio Media Inc., or any of its or their respective affiliates. This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice. All Content , Portfolio Media, Inc.
Will Deepwater Horizon Change a Long Standing Rule of Law? ACCIDENT. Insurance Provisions in the Drilling Contract
Will Deepwater Horizon Change a Long Standing Rule of Law? In re Deepwater Horizon, 710 F.3d 338 (5 th Cir. 2013, withdrawn on r hrg). r In re Deepwater Horizon, 728 F.3d 491 (5 th Cir. 2013). ACCIDENT
More informationATLANTA AUSTIN GENEVA HOUSTON LONDON NEW YORK SACRAMENTO WASHINGTON, DC
By Stephany Olsen LeGrand Institute of Energy Law, 5th Oilfield Services Conference - October, 2015 Unsurprisingly, serious incidents in the oil and gas industry, specifically those resulting in harm to
More informationThe BP/Transocean Decision
The BP/Transocean Decision Lloyd s Library Presentation April 24, 2013 Richard N. Dicharry, Esq. Phelps Dunbar LLP The Dispute As a result of notice from BP in May 2010, Underwriters sought a declaration
More informationThe Perils of Additional Insured Provisions
The Perils of Additional Insured Provisions By: Jack Carnegie Strasburger & Price LLP 909 Fannin, Suite 2300 Houston, Texas, 77010 713 951 5673 Jack.Carnegie@Strasburger.com 1 Risk Allocation Mechanisms
More informationAllocating Risk in Real Estate Leases: Contractual Indemnities, Additional Insured Endorsements and Waivers of Subrogation
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Allocating Risk in Real Estate Leases: Contractual Indemnities, Additional Insured Endorsements and Waivers of Subrogation Structuring Lease Provisions
More informationAdditional Insured Coverage: Achieving Your Intended Risk Allocation
Additional Insured Coverage: Achieving Your Intended Risk Allocation Presented to: South Carolina Association of Corporate Counsel June 17, 2016 Jennifer H. Thiem K&L Gates LLP Defining Additional Insured
More informationNEGOTIATNG INDEMNITIES AND LIABILITIES
NEGOTIATNG INDEMNITIES AND LIABILITIES 20 November 2018 Olga Labai Director INTRODUCTION www.ogc.works Oil and Gas Consultants is a training consultancy comprising professionals experienced in various
More informationCase 2:12-cv Document 1 Filed 07/31/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Case 2:12-cv-01978 Document 1 Filed 07/31/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, NATIONAL
More informationBaker & McKenzie LLP is a member firm of Baker & McKenzie International, a Swiss Verein with member law firms around the world. In accordance with
Baker & McKenzie LLP is a member firm of Baker & McKenzie International, a Swiss Verein with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional service organizations,
More informationStakes Are High For ERISA Fiduciaries
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Stakes Are High For ERISA Fiduciaries Law360, New
More informationGULF COAST ESCROW FUND CLAIMS PROCEDURE ESTABLISHED FOR THE DEEPWATER HORIZON OIL SPILL VERSUS REMEDIES AVAILABLE UNDER CURRENT LAW
GULF COAST ESCROW FUND CLAIMS PROCEDURE ESTABLISHED FOR THE DEEPWATER HORIZON OIL SPILL VERSUS REMEDIES AVAILABLE UNDER CURRENT LAW Jonathan K. Waldron Blank Rome LLP ABA Environmental and Energy Business
More informationTHE 24TH ANNUAL INSURANCE SYMPOSIUM: ALLOCATION & OTHER INSURANCE ROBERT J. WITMEYER & KATYA G. LONG
THE 24TH ANNUAL INSURANCE SYMPOSIUM: ALLOCATION & OTHER INSURANCE BY: ROBERT J. WITMEYER & KATYA G. LONG 2017 This paper and/or presentation provides information on general legal issues. It is not intended
More informationIP Agreements: Structuring Indemnification and Limitation of Liability Provisions to Allocate Infringement Risk
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A IP Agreements: Structuring Indemnification and Limitation of Liability Provisions to Allocate Infringement Risk TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 1, 2015 1pm Eastern
More informationThe Right To Reimbursement Of Defense Costs?
Portfolio Media, Inc. 648 Broadway, Suite 200 New York, NY 10012 www.law360.com Phone: +1 212 537 6331 Fax: +1 212 537 6371 customerservice@portfoliomedia.com The Right To Reimbursement Of Defense Costs?
More informationLee H. Shidlofsky AN UPDATE ON RECENT INSURANCE COVERAGE DECISIONS THE POLICYHOLDERS PERSPECTIVE
AN UPDATE ON RECENT INSURANCE COVERAGE DECISIONS AND THEIR IMPACT ON THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY: THE POLICYHOLDERS PERSPECTIVE LEE H. SHIDLOFSKY DOUGLAS P. SKELLEY SHIDLOFSKY LAW FIRM PLLC 7200 N. Mopac
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, v. Plaintiff, SHORENSTEIN REALTY SERVICES, LP; SHORENSTEIN MANAGEMENT,
More informationThursday, March 6, 2014 Houston, TX. 10:00 11:15 a.m. INDEMNITY, ADDITIONAL INSURED, AND THE BP OIL SPILL
Thursday, March 6, 2014 Houston, TX 10:00 11:15 a.m. INDEMNITY, ADDITIONAL INSURED, AND THE BP OIL SPILL Presented by Tracy Alan Saxe Partner Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. Robert Cunningham Partner Roach
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case: 15-10210 Document: 00513387132 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/18/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
More informationA Minor Setback In Recovering CERCLA Costs
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com A Minor Setback In Recovering CERCLA Costs Robert
More informationWHAT DOES IT MEAN TO EXHAUST AN UNDERLYING LAYER OF INSURANCE?
WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO EXHAUST AN UNDERLYING LAYER OF INSURANCE? By Robert M. Hall Mr. Hall is an attorney, a former law firm partner, a former insurance and reinsurance executive and acts as an insurance
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV. DAVID MILLS, Appellant V. ADVOCARE INTERNATIONAL, LP, Appellee
Dismissed and Opinion Filed September 10, 2015 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00769-CV DAVID MILLS, Appellant V. ADVOCARE INTERNATIONAL, LP, Appellee On Appeal from
More informationCash Collateral Orders Revisited Following ResCap
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Cash Collateral Orders Revisited Following ResCap
More informationThe Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and its Economic Impact on the Seafood. Industry. Introduction
Tiajuana Robinson Admiralty Law Professor Hooks November 16, 2012 The Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and its Economic Impact on the Seafood Industry Introduction The United States has faced many grave tragedies
More informationHands Off My Coverage! The Risks and Rewards of Allocating Risk Through Contracts and Additional Insured Endorsements
Hands Off My Coverage! The Risks and Rewards of Allocating Risk Through Contracts and Additional Insured Endorsements SPEAKERS: Meghan Magruder King & Spalding Jennifer Rutecky Services Shelby Guilbert
More informationResident counsel: Rockport, Texas office (by appointment)
Robert J. Cunningham Roach & Newton, LLP 10777 Weseimer Rd, Suite 212 Houston, Texas 77042 713-652-2033 office R 713-652-2029 fax R 832-971-6232 mobile rcunningham@roachnewton.com Resident counsel: Rockport,
More information2013 YEAR IN REVIEW SIGNIFICANT DECISIONS IN 2013: INSURANCE LAW UPDATE. By Jennifer Kelley
SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 2013 YEAR IN REVIEW SIGNIFICANT DECISIONS IN 2013: INSURANCE LAW UPDATE By Jennifer Kelley Lennar Corp. v. Markel American Ins. Co., No. 11-0394, 2013 Tex. LEXIS 597 (Tex. Aug. 23,
More informationLee H. Shidlofsky AN UPDATE ON RECENT INSURANCE COVERAGE DECISIONS THE POLICYHOLDERS PERSPECTIVE
AN UPDATE ON RECENT INSURANCE COVERAGE DECISIONS AND THEIR IMPACT ON THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY: THE POLICYHOLDERS PERSPECTIVE LEE H. SHIDLOFSKY DOUGLAS P. SKELLEY SHIDLOFSKY LAW FIRM PLLC 7200 N. Mopac
More informationSome Observations on Notice Requirements Under Claims-Made Forms and Other Policies with Strict Claim Reporting Requirements
Some Observations on Notice Requirements Under Claims-Made Forms and Other Policies with Strict Claim Reporting Requirements By Laura A. Foggan Partner, Wiley Rein LLP lfoggan@wileyrein.com Perhaps the
More informationDefendant. SUMMARY ORDER. Pending is plaintiff Utica Mutual Insurance Company s motion for
Case 6:13-cv-01178-GLS-TWD Document 99 Filed 07/23/15 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UTICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, v. Plaintiff, 6:13-cv-1178 (GLS/TWD) CLEARWATER
More informationEXCESS POLICY ATTACHMENT: POLICY LANGUAGE PREVAILS
EXCESS POLICY ATTACHMENT: POLICY LANGUAGE PREVAILS One of the most important issues under excess insurance policies relates to when liability attaches to the excess policy. In recent years, attachment
More informationDeepwater Horizon Oil Spill In the Wake of Disaster
Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill In the Wake of Disaster Steve McKinney Chair Environmental & Natural Resources Section Balch & Bingham LLP Chair Section of Environment Energy & Resources American Bar Association
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. v. CIVIL ACTION NO. H MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Case 4:14-cv-00849 Document 118 Filed in TXSD on 09/03/15 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION MID-CONTINENT CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff,
More informationNo Premium Recovery Guarantees For 5th Circ. Lenders
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com No Premium Recovery Guarantees For 5th Circ.
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge, KELLY and O BRIEN, Circuit Judges.
MARGARET GRAVES, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit April 21, 2017 Elisabeth
More informationState By State Survey:
Connecticut California Florida State By State Survey: and Exhaustion in the Additional Insured Context The Right Choice for Policyholders www.sdvlaw.com and Exhaustion 2 and Exhaustion in the Additional
More informationInsurance news. IndustrynewS. In Re: Deepwater Horizon Insurance Litigation Fifth Circuit Reverses in Favor of BP s Additional Insured Claim
A Newsletter from the Insurance Practice Group at Wiggin and Dana LLP Insurance news Spring 2013 We are pleased to share this latest issue of the Wiggin and Dana Insurance Practice Group Newsletter. We
More informationInsurance Tips For 'No Poach' Employment Antitrust Claims
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Insurance Tips For 'No Poach' Employment
More informationAppeal from the United States District Courtfor the Southern District of TexasUSDC 4:08-CV-21
MID-CONTINENT CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff - Appellant v. ACADEMY DEVELOPMENT, INCORPORATED; CHELSEA HARBOUR, LIMITED; LEGEND CLASSIC HOMES, LIMITED; LEGEND HOME CORPORATION, Defendants - Appellees No.
More informationOklahoma's Insurance Business Transfer Act: Objections Overruled?
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Oklahoma's Insurance Business Transfer Act:
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 06-1018 444444444444 D.R. HORTON-TEXAS, LTD., PETITIONER, v. MARKEL INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD., RESPONDENT 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444
More informationA Notable Footnote In High Court Merit Management Decision
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com A Notable Footnote In High Court Merit Management
More informationRECOVERING MORE INSURANCE FOR SEC AND INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS
RECOVERING MORE INSURANCE FOR SEC AND INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS By Mary Craig Calkins and Linda D. Kornfeld Recent decisions in the Office Depot, 1 MBIA, 2 and Gateway, Inc. 3 cases have refined the law
More informationTCPA Insurance Claim Issues Continue To Evolve
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com TCPA Insurance Claim Issues Continue To Evolve
More informationOFFSHORE ENERGY BULLETIN
Offshore Energy June 2013 OFFSHORE ENERGY BULLETIN Welcome to the second edition of our quarterly Offshore Energy Bulletin. We open this Bulletin with an article from our Australian practice, reporting
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. MERCHANTS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. LAIGHTON HOMES, LLC & a.
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme
More informationCERCLA s Equitable Allocation Of Liability
Portfolio Media, Inc. 648 Broadway, Suite 200 New York, NY 10012 www.law360.com Phone: +1 212 537 6331 Fax: +1 212 537 6371 customerservice@portfoliomedia.com CERCLA s Equitable Allocation Of Liability
More information[J ] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : OPINION. MR. JUSTICE EAKIN Decided: December 22, 2004
[J-164-2003] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT BARBARA BERNOTAS AND JOSEPH BERNOTAS, H/W, v. SUPER FRESH FOOD MARKETS, INC., v. GOLDSMITH ASSOCIATES AND ACCIAVATTI ASSOCIATES APPEAL
More informationState Farm Lloyds v. Page No , 0799, June 11, 2010, Texas Supreme Court
State Farm Lloyds v. Page No. 08-0799, 0799, June 11, 2010, Texas Supreme Court Mold coverage under the Texas homeowner s s policy: The Supreme Court s reconciliation of Balandran and Fiess Facts The policy:
More informationMaster Service Agreements for Oil and Gas: Key Provisions, Court Treatment
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Master Service Agreements for Oil and Gas: Key Provisions, Court Treatment TUESDAY, MARCH 13, 2018 1pm Eastern 12pm Central 11am Mountain 10am Pacific
More informationInsurance Coverage Law Update: The Recent Cases You Need to Know
Insurance Coverage Law Update: The Recent Cases You Need to Know October 13, 2016 Katherine J. Henry Kate Margolis J. Alex Purvis Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP Attorney-Client Privilege. Topics We Will
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 09-4001 KARL SCHMIDT UNISIA, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc
SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc STATE ex rel. CITY OF GRANDVIEW, MISSOURI Relator, v. No. SC95283 THE HONORABLE JACK R. GRATE, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN PROHIBITION Opinion issued April 5, 2016
More informationAppellant, Lower Court Case No.: CC O
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO- MOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, CASE NO.: CVA1-06 - 19 vs. CARRIE CLARK, Appellant, Lower Court Case
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION, ET AL. **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 15-291 ANTHONY J. BESLIN VERSUS ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION, ET AL. ********** APPEAL FROM THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF ACADIA, NO.
More informationRIGHT TO INDEPENDENT COUNSEL: OVERVIEW AND UPDATE
RIGHT TO INDEPENDENT COUNSEL: OVERVIEW AND UPDATE Wes Johnson Cooper & Scully, P.C. 900 Jackson Street, Suite 100 Dallas, TX 75202 4452 Telephone: 214 712 9500 Telecopy: 214 712 9540 Email: wes.johnson@cooperscully.com
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: Filing Date: April 4, 2011 Docket No. 29,537 FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF ARIZONA, v. Plaintiff-Appellee, CHRISTINE SANDOVAL and MELISSA
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case: 16-30456 Document: 00514043591 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED June 21, 2017 INTERNATIONAL
More informationMASTER SERVICE AGREEMENTS
MASTER SERVICE AGREEMENTS C. WILLIAM SMALLING; BSMALLING@BILLSMALLINGLAW.COM; (713) 513-7153 1 MASTER SERVICE AGREEMENTS MASTER SERVICE AGREEMENTS Often oil and gas producers use master service agreements
More informationThe 2004 ISO Additional Insured Endorsement Revisions Jack P. Gibson, CPCU, CLU, ARM 1 W. Jeffrey Woodward, CPCU 2
The 2004 ISO Additional Insured Endorsement Revisions Jack P. Gibson, CPCU, CLU, ARM 1 W. Jeffrey Woodward, CPCU 2 In filings announced in December 2003, Insurance Services Office, Inc. (ISO) introduced
More information2014 IL App (5th) U NO IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT
NOTICE Decision filed 12/12/14. The text of this decision may be changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Peti ion for Rehearing or the disposition of the same. 2014 IL App (5th) 140033-U NO. 5-14-0033
More informationWhat the Stats Don t Show: D&O Coverage Issues in the Real World. Presentation by White and Williams LLP
What the Stats Don t Show: D&O Coverage Issues in the Real World Presentation by White and Williams LLP Recent Trends in Securities Litigation / Regulatory Enforcement Actions and Impact on D&O Coverage
More informationALLOCATION AMONG MULTIPLE CARRIERS IN CONSTRUCTION DEFECT LITIGATION
ALLOCATION AMONG MULTIPLE CARRIERS IN CONSTRUCTION DEFECT LITIGATION FRED L. SHUCHART COOPER & SCULLY, P.C. 700 Louisiana Street, Suite 3850 Houston, Texas 77002 7th Annual Construction Law Symposium January
More informationNOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED OF FLORIDA
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JAMES MOTZENBECKER, ELIZABETH MOTZENBECKER, CHELSEA ACKERMECHT,
More informationCould the Viking Pump Decision by the New York Court of Appeals Signal a Broader Trend Nationwide on Long Tail Coverage Issues?
1 Could the Viking Pump Decision by the New York Court of Appeals Signal a Broader Trend Nationwide on Long Tail Coverage Issues? Presented by: Lisa Campisi, Esq. Andrew Nadolna, Esq. Heather Simpson,
More informationTarron L. Gartner-Ilai Cooper & Scully, PC 900 Jackson Street Suite 200 Dallas, Texas (214)
Tarron L. Gartner-Ilai Cooper & Scully, PC 900 Jackson Street Suite 200 Dallas, Texas 75202 (214) 712-9570 Tarron.gartner@cooperscully.com 2018 This paper and/or presentation provides information on general
More informationHURRICANE HARVEY AND TEXAS INSURANCE LAW UPDATE. J. Richard Rick Harmon, Jennifer M. Kearns Thompson Coe Cousins & Irons, LLP September 29, 2017
HURRICANE HARVEY AND TEXAS INSURANCE LAW UPDATE J. Richard Rick Harmon, Jennifer M. Kearns Thompson Coe Cousins & Irons, LLP September 29, 2017 Overview Hurricane Harvey New Legislation, effective 9/1/2017
More informationProcedural Considerations For Insurance Coverage Declaratory Judgment Actions
Procedural Considerations For Insurance Coverage Declaratory Judgment Actions New York City Bar Association October 24, 2016 Eric A. Portuguese Lester Schwab Katz & Dwyer, LLP 1 Introduction Purpose of
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-15-00527-CV In re Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Company ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY O P I N I O N Real party in interest Guy
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA INTERNATIONAL MARINE, LLC ET AL. VERSUS No C/W No
International Marine, LLC et al v. Integrity Fisheries, Inc. Doc. 194 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA INTERNATIONAL MARINE, LLC ET AL. CIVIL ACTION VERSUS No. 15-1446 C/W No.
More informationCase 3:14-cv MCR-CJK Document 1 Filed 03/05/14 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION
Case 3:14-cv-00112-MCR-CJK Document 1 Filed 03/05/14 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION HERSCHEL T. VINYARD, JR., Secretary, Florida Department of
More informationOil Pollution Act Liability Limits in 2012
Oil Pollution Act Liability Limits in 2012 2012 Report to Congress October 18, 2012 Executive Summary This is the sixth annual update to the report submitted on January 5, 2007, pursuant to section 603(c)
More informationCosts To Pension Withdrawal Liability May
Page 1 of 5 Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Costs To Pension Withdrawal Liability
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case: 15-20522 Document: 00513778783 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/30/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT VADA DE JONGH, Plaintiff Appellant, United States Court of Appeals Fifth
More informationReleased for Publication February 21, As Corrected March 4, Second Correction March 11, COUNSEL
REAGAN V. MCGEE DRILLING CORP., 1997-NMCA-014, 123 N.M. 68, 933 P.2d 867 WILBURN JACKSON REAGAN, JR., Plaintiff, vs. McGEE DRILLING CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, and McDONNOLD OPERATING, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
More informationF I L E D March 9, 2012
Case: 11-30375 Document: 00511783316 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/09/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit F I L E D March 9, 2012 Lyle
More informationADDITIONAL INSURED COVERAGE
ADDITIONAL INSURED COVERAGE MAXIMIZING COVERAGE IN A POST-BURLINGTON WORLD JEFFREY J. VITA, ESQ. Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. January 31, 2018 Additional Insured Coverage Maximizing Coverage in a Post-Burlington
More informationFINRA's Expanded Obligations For Broker-Dealers
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com FINRA's Expanded Obligations For Broker-Dealers Law360,
More informationTRIGGER OF COVERAGE FOR WRONGFUL PROSECUTION CLAIMS IN 2016
TRIGGER OF COVERAGE FOR WRONGFUL PROSECUTION CLAIMS IN 2016 Benjamin C. Eggert Partner WILEY REIN LLP wileyrein.com Introduction Ideally, the criminal justice system would punish only the guilty, and
More informationSecond and Fifth Circuits Split on Who is Entitled to Whistleblower Protection Under Dodd-Frank
H Reprinted with permission from the Employee Relations LAW JOURNAL Vol. 41, No. 4 Spring 2016 SPLIT CIRCUITS Second and Fifth Circuits Split on Who is Entitled to Whistleblower Protection Under Dodd-Frank
More informationIndemnification Agreements
NUCA Contracts Risk Management Manual Indemnification Agreements Atlanta, Georgia Charlotte, North Carolina Ft. Lauderdale, Florida Las Vegas, Nevada Tallahassee, Florida INTRODUCTION Owners who hire general
More informationCGL Contractual Liability Coverage: Navigating the Scope of the Liability Exclusion and its Exceptions
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A CGL Contractual Liability Coverage: Navigating the Scope of the Liability Exclusion and its Exceptions Advocating Coverage Positions for Policyholders
More informationTWO AUTOMOBILES INSURED UNDER FAMILY POLICY DOUBLES STATED MEDICAL PAYMENTS COVERAGE LIMIT OF LIABILITY
TWO AUTOMOBILES INSURED UNDER FAMILY POLICY DOUBLES STATED MEDICAL PAYMENTS COVERAGE LIMIT OF LIABILITY Central Surety & Insurance Corp. v. Elder 204 Va. 192,129 S.E. 2d 651 (1963) Mrs. Elder, plaintiff
More informationCoverage Issues After The Oil Stops Flowing By John G. Nevius, Esq., P.E. Thousands of gallons of crude oil continue to gush daily from the sea floor
This article was originally published on Insurance Law360 on June 28, 2010 Coverage Issues After The Oil Stops Flowing By John G. Nevius, Esq., P.E. Thousands of gallons of crude oil continue to gush daily
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/16/ :40 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 20 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/28/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------X LIVE NATION MARKETING, INC., LIVE NATION WORLDWIDE, INC., and WESTCHESTER
More informationCase 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/30/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Case 4:17-cv-02647 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/30/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE DEEPWATER DRILLING INC. Plaintiff,
More informationPower Of The Fiduciary Duty Contractual Waiver In LLCs
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Power Of The Fiduciary Duty Contractual Waiver
More informationThis article was originally published in Law360 on May 15, 2015.
FCA Threats Are Likely Greatest Outside The Fortune 100 This article was originally published in Law360 on May 15, 2015. by Jeffrey A. Kiburtz and Joseph D. Jean Jeffrey A. Kiburtz Litigation +1.213.488.7155
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed July 22, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Linn County, Mitchell E.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 9-342 / 08-1570 Filed July 22, 2009 ADDISON INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. KNIGHT, HOPPE, KURNICK & KNIGHT, L.L.C., Defendant-Appellee. Judge. Appeal from
More informationCase 2:10-md CJB-JCW Document Filed 10/30/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Case 2:10-md-02179-CJB-JCW Document 25122-1 Filed 10/30/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA In re: Oil Spill by the Oil Rig Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of Mexico,
More informationUNDERSTANDING WAIVERS OF SUBROGATION By Gary L. Wickert, Mohr & Anderson, S.C., Hartford, WI
UNDERSTANDING WAIVERS OF SUBROGATION By Gary L. Wickert, Mohr & Anderson, S.C., Hartford, WI Waivers of Subrogation are a necessary evil of underwriting, but their application and effect on subrogation
More informationIs Your Energy Contract At Risk In Texas?
For the latest breaking news and analysis on energy industry legal issues, visit Law360 today. http://www.law360.com/energy Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com
More informationINSIDE THIS EDITION: Not our First Rodeo: Navigating Insurance Law in Texas. Letter from the Insurance Company Team
Volume 10 Issue 32 Spring 2012 Letter from the Insurance Company Team This past year, the Insurance Company Team recently welcomed six new team members from The Woodlands, Texas office of Steptoe & Johnson
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE CLIFTON CUNNINGHAM and DON TEED, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, -against- Plaintiffs, FEDERAL EXPRESS
More informationHORIZONTAL v. VERTICAL EXHAUSTION: PRIORITY OF COVERAGE IN CONSTRUCTION LOSSES. Jeffrey J. Vita Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.
HORIZONTAL v. VERTICAL EXHAUSTION: PRIORITY OF COVERAGE IN CONSTRUCTION LOSSES Jeffrey J. Vita Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. February 12, 2009 Jeffrey J. Vita is a founding partner of Saxe Doernberger
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY RABRINDA CHOUDRY, and ) DEBJANI CHOUDRY, ) ) Defendants Below/Appellants, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. CPU4-12-000076 ) STATE OF
More informationTRANSBORDER ISSUES AND EXHAUSTION. Sasha Rao
TRANSBORDER ISSUES AND EXHAUSTION Sasha Rao 1 THE WITHIN THE UNITED STATES REQUIREMENT The patent statute states: whoever without authority makes, uses, offers to sell, or sells any patented invention,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 6:10-cv JA-KRS.
Case: 11-14883 Date Filed: 03/22/2013 Page: 1 of 11 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 11-14883 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 6:10-cv-00222-JA-KRS
More informationCase: 1:15-cv Document #: 34 Filed: 10/18/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:654
Case: 1:15-cv-10798 Document #: 34 Filed: 10/18/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:654 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY,
More informationSharing the Misery: Defects with Construction Defect Coverage
CLM 2016 National Construction Claims Conference September 28-30, 2016 San Diego, CA Sharing the Misery: Defects with Construction Defect Coverage I. A brief history of the law regarding insurance coverage
More informationHigh Stakes In Nev.'s Lender Vs. HOA Fight
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com High Stakes In Nev.'s Lender Vs. HOA Fight Law360,
More information