TWENTY FIRST ANNUAL NORTHEAST SURETY AND FIDELITY CLAIMS CONFERENCE
|
|
- Chloe Lynch
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 TWENTY FIRST ANNUAL NORTHEAST SURETY AND FIDELITY CLAIMS CONFERENCE rd th SEPTEMBER 23-24, 2010 REGULATING ETHICS - ATTEMPTS TO REGULATE SURETY CLAIMS PRACTICES PRESENTED BY: CYNTHIA E. RODGERS-WAIRE Wright, Constable & Skeen, LLP 100 North Charles Street Baltimore, MD OMAR J. HARB Alber Crafton, PSC 2301 West Big Beaver Road - Suite 300 Troy, MI
2 REGULATING ETHICS ATTEMPTS TO REGULATE SURETY CLAIMS PRACTICES By: Cynthia E. Rodgers-Waire and Omar J. Harb INTRODUCTION While generally, a determination of whether a surety has conducted itself in an ethical manner would be a case-by-case determination, there have been various attempts over the years to remove the guesswork from this analysis. These exercises began with model acts, which have been adopted (with various modifications) by most states. This paper will briefly examine the history of the model acts and some common issues addressed by the various states in their versions of the model acts. I. BASIS FOR STATE LEGISLATION/REGULATION/MODEL ACTS A. Unfair Trade Practices Act Although insurance regulation has largely been left to the purview of the individual states, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), an organization comprised of the elected or appointed regulators of the individual states, was formed in 1871 to, in part, coordinate regulation of multi-state insurers. 1 The Unfair Trade Practices Act, first promulgated in 1947, proposed wide-ranging model regulations for nearly all facets of insurance regulation, including claims handling practices. 2 Significantly, the UTPA did not exclude suretyship from its provisions or definitions, and was widely, but not uniformly, adopted by the states. B. Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act In 1991, NAIC sought to further clarify and amplify the broad claims handling provisions and promulgated the Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act (UCSPA). The USPCA sought to delve into more specific detail in more uniformly identifying the specific acts, or failures to act, which would constitute an unfair claims settlement practice, including: - knowingly misrepresenting to claimants and insureds relevant facts or policy provisions relating to coverages at issue - failing to acknowledge with reasonable promptness pertinent communications with respect to claims arising under its policies - failing to adopt and implement reasonable standards for prompt investigation and settlement of claims arising under its policies - not attempting in good faith to effectuate prompt, fair and equitable settlement of claims submitted in which liability has become reasonably clear 1 See 2 NAIC, Unfair Trade Practices Act (1947).
3 - compelling insureds or beneficiaries to institute suits to recover amounts due under its policies by offering substantially less than the amounts ultimately recovered in suits brought by them - refusing to pay claims without conducting a reasonable investigation - failing to affirm or deny coverage of claims within a reasonable time after having completed its investigation related to such claim or claims - attempting to settle or settling claims for less than the amount that a reasonable person would believe the insured or beneficiary was entitled by reference to written or printed advertising material accompanying or made part of an application - attempting to settle or settling claims on the basis of an application that was materially altered without notice to, or knowledge or consent of, the insured - making claims payments to an insured or beneficiary without indicating the coverage under which each payment is being made - unreasonably delaying the investigation or payment of claims by requiring both a formal proof of loss form and subsequent verification that would result in duplication of information and verification appearing in the formal proof of loss form - failing in the case of claims denials or offers of compromise settlement to promptly provide a reasonable and accurate explanation of the basis of such actions - failing to provide forms necessary to present claims within fifteen (15) calendar days of a request with reasonable explanations regarding their use - failing to adopt and implement reasonable standards to assure that the repairs of a repairer owned by or required to be used by the insurer are performed in a workmanlike manner. 3 Interestingly, the USPCA 1 also provides that: [t]he purpose of this Act is to set forth standards for the investigation and disposition of claims arising under policies or certificates of insurance issued to residents of [state]. It is not intended to cover claims involving workers compensation, fidelity, suretyship or boiler and machinery insurance. 4 Like its predecessor, the UCSPA was adopted by many of the states in the years following its original promulgation. However, due in part to the vagaries of the individual states own existing regulations and practices, their adaptation of modified versions of the UTPA and/or the UCSPA, and the UCSPA s intentional exclusion of suretyship from its scope, neither the UTPA nor the UCSPA delivered uniformity or clarity to the states definitions and regulation of unfair claims settlement practices for sureties. 3 Uniform Claims Settlement Practices Act (1991). 4 Id. 2
4 II. SOME ISSUES AND PRACTICES COVERED BY STATE LEGISLATION AND REGULATION A. Are Sureties Covered by Insurance Legislation/Regulation? Every state has some form of insurance claim handling legislation. Nearly every state has adopted some version of the UCSPA or its predecessor, the UTPA. 5 Because insurance law is purely a creature of state law, each state legislature is free to create its own unique modifications. Although many states have adopted the UCSPA in full, verbatim, some states have made minor variations to conform to their own interests. Thus, it is necessary in each instance to examine the applicable jurisdiction s statute and regulations to determine what alterations, if any, have been made. 6 One good example of such state-by-state variation is whether the unfair insurance claims practices legislation applies to sureties. As noted above, UCSPA Section 1 expressly excludes suretyship from coverage under the UCSPA. 7 The majority of states have elected not to adopt UCSPA s Section 1 exclusion of sureties. A few states, by their own legislation, explicitly exclude sureties from coverage. For example, in Maryland, the applicable statute states that it does not apply to reinsurance, worker s compensation insurance or surety insurance but does apply to fidelity policies. 8 In contrast, the Colorado insurance statute defines insurance policy or insurance contract in a manner that includes all contracts of suretyship. 9 The statute also contains specific examples of unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the business of insurance. 10 The California insurance code does not state whether a surety is subject to the statutory unfair claim provisions; however, related regulations provide that the term insurance policy does not include a surety bond. 11 Instead, California provides a separate section in its regulations containing standards applicable to surety bonds. 12 In some states where the statutory language is inconclusive, courts have stepped in to express their 5 Mississippi has not adopted any version of the USCPA or UTPA; rather, Mississippi s insurance statute merely provides that insurance companies cannot act or engage in practices considered unfair or deceptive. Miss. Code Ann (1). In Alabama, an insurance company cannot refuse to pay or settle claims without just cause and with such frequency as to indicate a general business practice. Ala. Code See James P. Diwik, A State by State Survey of Unfair Insurance Practices Regulations, in The Fidelity and Surety Desk Reference Book (DeWitte Thompson ed., 2006), for a then current list of applicable statutes. 7 8 In contrast, there is no similar provision under the UTPA excluding sureties. See Md. Code Ann. Ins (b). 9 Colo. Rev. Stat (2). See also Brighton Sch. Dist. 27 J v. Transamerica Premier Ins. Co., 923 P.2d 328 (Colo. App. 1996) aff d. 940 P.2d 348 (Colo. 1997) Colo. Rev. Stat (1)(h). Cal. Code of Reg., tit. 10, Chapter 5, Subchapter 7.5, (j). Cal. Code of Reg., tit. 10, Chapter 5, Subchapter 7.5,
5 opinions. For example, in Great American Ins. Co. v. North Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 13, the Supreme Court of Texas, recognizing the fundamental differences between suretyship and insurance, held that a surety is not in the business of insurance and was not subject to Texas version of the UCSPA. Subsequently, Texas enacted its Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act, which supported the appellate court s interpretation and excludes sureties from the definition of the types of insurers to which the Act is applicable. 14 B. Degree of Intentional Conduct Necessary for Liability to be Found The statutes are not consistent with regard to what conduct is necessary to trigger liability as an unfair claim practice. In some states, a single act in violation of one of the prohibited unfair claims settlement practices, if knowingly committed, can form the basis for liability. Colorado s statute references a willful violation of the statute. 15 Alternatively, an insurer can also be found liable under the Colorado statute by engaging in a prohibited practice with such frequency that it is found to be a general business practice. California s statute scheme is similar. 16 In order to find liability under New York s statute, the insurer must commit the proscribed act without just cause and with such frequency as to indicate a general business practice. 17 Finally, in yet another variation, Connecticut s Unfair Claim Settlement Practices Statute omits any reference to a willful component and establishes liability only when the improper conduct is engaged in as a general business practice. 18 Apart from certain egregious actions of deception described in the statute, Florida s law likewise requires the insurer to engage in the prohibited acts as part of a general business practice in order to establish liability. 19 C. Conducting a Reasonable Investigation Most states have adopted some version of the following unfair settlement practice found in the UCSPA: Failing to adopt and implement reasonable standards for prompt investigation and settlement of claims arising under its policies S.W.2d 415, 424 (Tex. 1995). Tex. Ins. Code Ann ; see also Tex. Admin. Code tit (6) and Colo. Rev. Stat (1)(h). Cal. Ins. Code (h). N.Y. ISC. LAW Conn. Gen. Stat. 38A-816(6). Fla. Stat (1)(i)(3). 4
6 Other statutes simply direct an insurer to conduct a reasonable investigation before denying any claim. What is determined to be reasonable is a fact-specific inquiry addressed on a case-by-case basis. D. Promptness of Investigation/Response to Claim Many states statutes or regulations require an insurer or surety to respond to a claimant within a particular time period or within a reasonable time. For obvious reasons, a claimant has an interest in having its claim resolved at the soonest possible opportunity. States have determined that it is an improper practice to act in a dilatory manner in investigating or responding to a claim. In New York, for example, the Rules provide the following among the Standards for prompt, fair and equitable settlements : Within 15 business days after receipt by the insurer of a properly executed proof of loss and/or receipt of all items, statements and forms which the insurer requested from the claimant, the claimant, or the claimant's authorized representative, shall be advised in writing of the acceptance or rejection of the claim by the insurer. 20 Such a rule contemplates that the 15-day period does not begin to run until after the insurer/surety receives all items requested from the claimant. This leaves the issue of whether the claimant has appropriately complied with all requests for information or documentation open for discussion, potentially. However, to the extent the claimant has at least arguably provided all requested items, a surety has only 15 days to provide a response. Note that the provision gives the insurer/surety an opportunity to obtain additional time to determine whether a claim should be accepted or rejected, as long as it sends a notice to the claimant to that effect and provides the reasons why additional time is required. Id. In Pennsylvania, on the other hand, the insurer/surety is not given an express period of time within which to respond, but rather must do so within a reasonable time. Specifically, the Pennsylvania statute provides that one of the acts that would constitute an unfair claim settlement practice (if committed with sufficient frequency to be considered a business practice) is [f]ailing to affirm or deny coverage of claims within a reasonable time after proof of loss statements have been completed and communicated to the company or its representative. 21 It is left to interpretation what is considered reasonable, and presumably this would be a case-by-case determination. E. Promptness of Payment Commonly, states require insurers/sureties to promptly pay claims when coverage is not contested. For example, in Connecticut, it is an unfair claim settlement practice to fail to promptly settle claims, where liability has become reasonably clear, under one portion of NYCRR 216.6(c). 40 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann (a)(10)(v). 5
7 the insurance policy coverage in order to influence settlements under other portions Very similar language is contained under California s Insurance Code. 23 These provisions appear to be intended to prevent an insurer/surety from using a payment on an undisputed portion of a claim as leverage to obtain a favorable settlement on another claim. Michigan s statute is more specific, expressly requiring an insurer/surety to pay the undisputed portion of a claim within 60 days after receiving the proof of loss. 24 That statute further provides that the amount of the claim that is payable accrues interest at the rate of 12 percent per year, commencing 60 days after the proof of loss is received. 25 F. Statements or Representations Regarding the Statute of Limitations Less common is a requirement that the insurer/surety notify claimants of the imminent expiration of the applicable statute of limitations. A Minnesota statute provides that the following constitutes an unfair settlement practice : failing to advise in writing an insured or claimant who has filed a notification of claim known to be unresolved, and who has not retained an attorney, of the expiration of a statute of limitations at least 60 days prior to that expiration. 26 The provision only pertains to unrepresented claimants, and is aimed at protecting such claimants from being surprised by the running of the statute of limitations. Note, however, that the statute creates an exception with respect to claimants who have not communicated with the insurer/surety for two years prior to the running of the statute of limitations, creating the assumption that the claimant is no longer pursuing the claim. 27 It is unclear whether this statute would apply to contractual periods of limitations, in addition to statutory limitations periods. G. Is There a Private Right of Action Under Unfair Claims Practices Acts? Both the UTPA and the UCSPA expressly provide that they are not intended to provide for a private right of action; however, because states have not all uniformly adopted all of the provisions of either the UTPA or the UCSPA, it is not clear in every state whether a private cause of action exists under the applicable unfair claims practices statute. In those states where the statute does not expressly prohibit a private right of action and where no case authority is established, the law remains uncertain. In 1979, the California Supreme Court ruled that third parties had standing to sue insurers for violations of California s unfair claims Conn. Gen. Stat. 38a-816(6)(m). Cal. Ins. Code Sec (h)(12). MCL (3). MCL (4). Minn. Stat. 72A.201 (Subsection 4) (8). Id. 6
8 settlement practices statute. 28 Nine years later, the California Supreme Court reserved itself and stated that California s statute did not create a private right of action for any party, whether first-party insured or third-party claimant, and was intended to be used as an enforcement device by the State s insurance commissioner. 29 Most courts that have addressed this issue have ruled that no statutory private cause of action exists, though common-law claims of bad faith are recognized in many jurisdictions. A handful of states continue to recognize a private right of action under unfair claim practice statutes. III. INDUSTRY SELF-REGULATION In addition to claims-handling rules imposed by states, insurance companies themselves can elect to implement a set of guidelines for ethical standards to be followed. The Chartered Property Casualty Underwriters ( CPCU ) Society published a Guide to Organizational Ethics Policy, which provides assistance to an insurer that wishes to develop and maintain an ethics policy. The CPCU s Guide sets forth various steps involved in the process of developing an organizational ethics policy, including: Creating an ethical mission Selecting the appropriate major topics and sub topics to be addressed, each containing a short statement of the expected behavior for each topic or sub topic Identification of how and to whom any violations of the Policy should be reported (including whether the reporting individual may choose to remain anonymous) Identification of the sanctions for violations (ranging from discussions with management to warnings to suspension or termination of the individual) Identification of an appeals process for persons sanctioned, if any Obtaining approval of the Policy from senior management and the organization s counsel Introduction of the Policy to members of the organization (it is recommended that this be done by top management, and that all members be required to sign a statement that he or she has read, understands and will abide by the Ethics Policy) Periodically updating the Policy as appropriate Royal Globe Ins. Co. v. Superior Court, 592 P.2d 329 (Cal. 1979). Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman s Fund Ins. Cos., 758 P.2d 58 (Cal. 1988). 7
9 While an internal ethics policy may not be binding as it relates to a particular claimant, it could be persuasive if the insurer/surety s good faith is at issue. In other words, evidence that the claims handler followed the company s ethics policy could be important evidence in determining whether the claim was handled in good faith. Conversely, evidence that the claims handler did not follow the company s own internal procedures could be a significant hurdle in the company s attempt to defend a claim of bad faith against it. In any event, companies that determine to develop and implement an internal ethics policy should do so with great care and only after consultation with counsel. IV. CONCLUSION The various statutes and regulations enacted by the states provide important ethical guidelines for the surety and insurance industry. As shown by the differing language and provisions enacted by some of the states, it is important for claims handlers to review and become familiar with the particular guidelines in effect in the states in which they are working. To the extent the insurance or surety company has its own policies, those must be taken into account as well in making claims handling decisions v3 8
MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2001
MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2001 By: Representative Stevens To: Insurance HOUSE BILL NO. 656 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 AN ACT TO CREATE THE "UNFAIR CLAIMS SETTLEMENT PRACTICES ACT"; TO SET FORTH STANDARDS
More informationUNFAIR CLAIMS SETTLEMENT PRACTICES. 1. What insurer practices are addressed by statute, regulation and/or insurance department advisory?
UNFAIR CLAIMS SETTLEMENT PRACTICES New Hampshire Law 1. What insurer practices are addressed by statute, regulation and/or insurance department advisory? a. Misrepresentation of facts or policy provisions.
More informationUNFAIR CLAIMS SETTLEMENT PRACTICES ACT. Cease and Desist and Penalty Orders Penalty for Violation of Cease and Desist Orders
Model Regulation Service January 1997 Table of Contents Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. Section 5. Section 6. Section 7. Section 8. Section 9. Purpose Definitions Unfair Claims Settlement Practices
More informationTITLE DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION
230-RICR-20-40-2 TITLE 230 - DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION CHAPTER 20 - INSURANCE SUBCHAPTER 40 - CLAIMS PART 2 - Unfair Property/Casualty Claims Settlement Practices 2.1 Authority This Part is adopted
More informationTHE UNFAIR CLAIMS SETTLEMENT PRACTICES REGULATION. AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending Order R 78-3, filed 7/27/78, effective 9/1/78)
THE UNFAIR CLAIMS SETTLEMENT PRACTICES REGULATION WAC 284-30-300 Authority and purpose. RCW 48.30.010 authorizes the commissioner to define methods of competition and acts and practices in the conduct
More informationH 7412 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D
LC00 01 -- H 1 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 01 A N A C T RELATING TO INSURANCE - UNFAIR CLAIMS SETTLEMENT PRACTICES ACT Introduced By: Representatives Palangio,
More informationGUIDELINES ON CORPORATE OWNED LIFE INSURANCE
Model Regulation Service April 2005 Corporate Owned Life Insurance (COLI) is life insurance a corporate employer buys covering one or more employees. With COLI, the employer is generally the applicant,
More informationCh. 146 UNFAIR INSURANCE PRACTICES CHAPTER 146. UNFAIR INSURANCE PRACTICES A. UNFAIR CLAIMS SETTLEMENT PRACTICES
Ch. 146 UNFAIR INSURANCE PRACTICES 31 146.1 CHAPTER 146. UNFAIR INSURANCE PRACTICES Subchap. Sec. A. UNFAIR CLAIMS SETTLEMENT PRACTICES... 146.1 Authority The provisions of this Chapter 146 issued under
More informationModel Regulation Service April 2000 UNIFORM DEPOSIT LAW
Model Regulation Service April 2000 Table of Contents Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. Section 5. Section 6. Section 7. Section 8. Section 9. Section 10. Section 1. Definitions Deposit Requirement
More informationMODEL REGULATION ON UNFAIR DISCRIMINATION IN LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE ON THE BASIS OF PHYSICAL OR MENTAL IMPAIRMENT
Table of Contents Model Regulation Service June 1979 MODEL REGULATION ON UNFAIR DISCRIMINATION IN LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 1. Authority Purpose Unfairly Discriminatory
More informationInsurance Industry Regulation. Unfair Claims Settlement Practices. Insurance Code (h) 1 & 2
Insurance Industry Regulation The Insurance Code established The California Department of Insurance to regulate the practice of insurance in California. To a large extent they are involved in financial
More informationTHE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS
THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS Fair Claims Settlement Practices Regulations Sections 2695.3. File and Record Documentation. Summary: Insurers are required to maintain complete and legible files with
More informationRULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INSURANCE DIVISION OF INSURANCE UNFAIR CLAIMS SETTLEMENT PRACTICES TABLE OF CONTENTS
RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INSURANCE DIVISION OF INSURANCE 0780-01-05 UNFAIR CLAIMS SETTLEMENT PRACTICES TABLE OF CONTENTS 0780-01-05-.01 Purpose 0780-01-05-.02 Scope 0780-01-05-.03
More informationPROPERTY AND CASUALTY MODEL RATING LAW (PRIOR APPROVAL VERSION)
Model Regulation Service July 2009 PROPERTY AND CASUALTY MODEL RATING LAW (PRIOR APPROVAL VERSION) Table of Contents Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. Section 5. Section 6. Section 7. Section
More informationFlorida Senate SB 1592
By Senator Thrasher 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 A bill to be entitled An act relating to civil remedies against insurers; amending s. 624.155, F.S.; revising
More informationModel Regulation Service July 1996
Model Regulation Service July 1996.MODEL INDEMNITY CONTRACTS ACT Editor s Note: These laws are generally referred to as Reciprocal Insurance or Inter-Insurance. Table of Contents Section 1. Section 2.
More informationInsurance Chapter ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER STANDARDS FOR PROPERTY/CASUALTY INSURANCE CLAIMS
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 482-1-125 STANDARDS FOR PROPERTY/CASUALTY INSURANCE CLAIMS TABLE OF CONTENTS 482-1-125-.01 Authority 482-1-125-.02 Purpose 482-1-125-.03 Definitions
More informationJuly 25, AGOP CANCIK TINKER AVE Tujunga,CA, 91042
July 25, 2016 AGOP CANCIK 10516 TINKER AVE Tujunga,CA, 91042 RE: Insured: AGOP CANCIK Policy Number: ANG 0285282-08(01) Claim Number : 3102149 Date of Loss: 7/21/2016 Dear AGOP CANCIK : Pacific Specialty
More informationCLM 2016 New York Conference December 1, 2016 New York, New York
CLM 2016 New York Conference December 1, 2016 New York, New York Adjuster training - Teaching Good Faith to prevent Bad Faith, Including Practice Advice to Avoid Extra-Contractual Claims in the Claim Handling
More informationN.J.A.C. 11: NEW JERSEY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE Copyright (c) 2016 by the New Jersey Office of Administrative Law
N.J.A.C. 11:2-17.1 NEW JERSEY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE Copyright (c) 2016 by the New Jersey Office of Administrative Law *** This file includes all Regulations adopted and published through the *** *** New
More informationTHE NAIC MODEL UNFAIR CLAIMS SETTLEMENT PRACTICES ACT
REPRINTED IN PART FROM: The Punitive Damages Lottery Chase Is Over: Is There A Regulatory Alternative To The Tort Of Common Law Bad Faith And Does It Provide An Alternative Deterrent? 37 ARIZ. ST. L.J.
More informationANTI-ARSON APPLICATION MODEL BILL
Model Regulation Service - January 1993 ANTI-ARSON APPLICATION MODEL BILL Table of Contents Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. Section 5. Section 6. Section 1. Purpose Anti-Arson Application -
More informationVARIABLE CONTRACT MODEL LAW
Model Regulation Service April 1999 Table of Contents Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. Section 5. Section 6. Section 1. Domestic Companies Contract Statement Required License Required Power
More informationRECOGNITION OF THE 2001 CSO MORTALITY TABLE FOR USE IN DETERMINING MINIMUM RESERVE LIABILITIES AND NONFORFEITURE BENEFITS MODEL REGULATION
Model Regulation Service January 2003 Table of Contents Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. Section 5. Section 6. Section 7. Section 8. Section 9. Section 1. Authority Purpose Definitions 2001
More informationResponding to Allegations of Bad Faith
Responding to Allegations of Bad Faith Matthew M. Haar Saul Ewing LLP 2 N. Second Street, 7th Floor Harrisburg, PA 17101 (717) 257-7508 mhaar@saul.com Matthew M. Haar is a litigation attorney in Saul Ewing
More informationNexus Assistant Results
Nexus Assistant Results Tax Type: Corporate Income Legend: N/A - Not Applicable Alabama --Company Business income includes income from intangible personal property, the acquisition, management, and disposition
More informationARTICLE 8. PROHIBITED PRACTICES, PENALTIES R Unfair Claims Settlement Practices A. Applicability. This rule applies to all persons and to
ARTICLE 8. PROHIBITED PRACTICES, PENALTIES R20-6-801. Unfair Claims Settlement Practices A. Applicability. This rule applies to all persons and to all insurance policies, insurance contracts and subscription
More informationSection 6 Unfair Trade Practices, Unfair Claims Settlement Practices, the Need for Errors and Omissions Coverage, and the Golden Rule
Section 6 Unfair Trade Practices, Unfair Claims Settlement Practices, the Need for Errors and Omissions Coverage, and the Golden Rule States have implemented unfair trade practices acts. These acts attempt
More informationNOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT SERENITY HARPER, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4987 )
More informationSTOP LOSS INSURANCE MODEL ACT
Model Regulation Service July 2002 Table of Contents Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. Section 5. Section 1. Purpose and Intent Definitions Stop Loss Insurance Coverage Standards Actuarial Certification
More informationRe: Letter of Amici Curiae Supporting Petition for Review in PacifiCare Life and Health Insurance Co. v. Jones, No. S252252
November 29, 2018 Via TrueFiling Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye & Honorable Associate Justices California Supreme Court 350 McAllister Street San Francisco, CA 94102 Re: Letter of Amici Curiae Supporting
More informationYour right to file a grievance regarding a decision about your benefits A. Standard Grievance Procedure Appeals Unit
Your right to file a grievance regarding a decision about your benefits Most questions or concerns about how we processed your claim or request for benefits can be resolved through a phone call to one
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS ERNESTINE DOROTHY MICHELSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, FOR PUBLICATION January 10, 2003 9:05 a.m. v No. 233114 Saginaw Circuit Court GLENN A. VOISON and VOISON AGENCY, LC No.
More informationSurvey Of Bond Requirements For Mortgage Brokers And Lenders
1140 19th Street NW, Suite 500 Washington, DC 20036 www.surety.org Survey Of Bond Requirements For s And Lenders August 2017 The Surety & Fidelity Association of America, 2017 SURVEY OF BOND REQUIREMENTS
More informationAssembly Bill No. 12 Committee on Commerce and Labor
Assembly Bill No. 12 Committee on Commerce and Labor CHAPTER... AN ACT relating to adjusters; requiring adjusters to complete certain continuing education; establishing standards of conduct for adjusters;
More informationMODEL REGULATION PERMITTING THE RECOGNITION OF PREFERRED MORTALITY TABLES FOR USE IN DETERMINING MINIMUM RESERVE LIABILITIES
Model Regulation Service October 2009 MODEL REGULATION PERMITTING THE RECOGNITION OF PREFERRED MORTALITY TABLES FOR USE IN DETERMINING MINIMUM RESERVE LIABILITIES Table of Contents Section 1. Section 2.
More informationSTOCKHOLDERS INFORMATION SUPPLEMENT SCHEDULE SIS
Model Regulation Service April 2001 STOCKHOLDERS INFORMATION SUPPLEMENT SCHEDULE SIS Table of Contents Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. Section 5. Section 1. General Instructions Financial Reporting
More informationReferred to Committee on Commerce and Labor. SUMMARY Makes various changes relating to insurance adjusters. (BDR )
REQUIRES TWO-THIRDS MAJORITY VOTE (, ) A.B. ASSEMBLY BILL NO. COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE AND LABOR (ON BEHALF OF THE DIVISION OF INSURANCE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY) PREFILED NOVEMBER, 0 Referred
More informationCORPORATE GOVERNANCE ANNUAL DISCLOSURE MODEL REGULATION
Table of Contents Model Regulation Service 4 th Quarter 2014 Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. Section 5. Section 6. Section 1. Authority Purpose Definitions Filing Procedures Contents of Corporate
More informationASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 211th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED MAY 17, 2004
ASSEMBLY, No. STATE OF NEW JERSEY th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED MAY, 00 Sponsored by: Assemblyman NEIL M. COHEN District 0 (Union) SYNOPSIS Revises the "New Jersey Surplus Lines Insurance Guaranty Fund Act."
More informationBest Practices for Borrower Ability to Repay Rules
March 30, 2012 Best Practices for Borrower Ability to Repay Rules by Anna DeSimone President & Founder About one year ago, I published an article entitled Borrower Repayment Ability on the Radar. The article
More informationCommonwealth Schools of Insurance
Commonwealth Schools of Insurance P.O. Box 22414, Louisville, KY 40252-0414 502.425.5987 FAX 502.429.0755 E-mail: info@commonwealthschools.com INSTRUCTIONS TO COMPLETE THE CONTINUING EDUCATION COURSE Thank
More informationINSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION WHAT YOU DON T KNOW CAN COST YOU
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF OKLAHOMA INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION WHAT YOU DON T KNOW CAN COST YOU Gail S. Kelley, P.E., Esq., LEED AP October 27, 2017 The Design Agreement Establishes each party
More informationSTATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE 300 Capitol Mall, 17 th Floor Sacramento, CA INITIAL STATEMENT OF REASONS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE 300 Capitol Mall, 17 th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 INITIAL STATEMENT OF REASONS Anti-Steering in Auto Body Repairs Date: March 04, 2016 CDI Regulation File:
More informationI. Introduction. Appeals this year was Fisher v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 2015 COA
Fisher v. State Farm: A Case Analysis September 2015 By David S. Canter I. Introduction One of the most important opinions to be handed down from the Colorado Court of Appeals this year was Fisher v. State
More informationLife Insurance Summary of State Exemptions 1 for Cash Value 2 and Proceeds 3
Life Insurance Summary of State Exemptions 1 for Cash Value 2 and Proceeds 3 State Statute Cash Value Exempt? Proceeds Exempt? Alabama Ala. Code 6-10-8, 27-14-29(c) insured or person effecting insurance
More informationUPDATE ON INSURANCE CODE ON DECEPTIVE, UNFAIR, AND PROHIBITED PRACTICES
UPDATE ON INSURANCE CODE ON DECEPTIVE, UNFAIR, AND PROHIBITED PRACTICES STEVEN R. SHATTUCK COOPER & SCULLY, P.C. 900 JACKSON STREET, SUITE 100 DALLAS, TEXAS 75202 TELEPHONE: 214/712-9500 FACSIMILE: 214/712-9540
More informationFifty State Survey of Prompt Payment Acts for Construction Contracts
To Federal Contracts 31 U.S.C. 3901 et seq.; 48 CFR 52.232-27. Progress: 14 days after invoice. Final: 30 days after invoice and final acceptance. 7 days after 7 days after Per Contract Disputes Act; compounded
More informationSubstitute for SENATE BILL No. 155
Session of Substitute for SENATE BILL No. By Committee on Financial Institutions and Insurance - 0 0 AN ACT concerning insurance; relating to surplus lines coverage; defining terms; relating to gross premiums
More informationTable of Contents. HUD / FHA Branch Requirements
Table of Contents Section Page(s) HUD/Federal Requirements 2-5 Alabama 6 California 7 Colorado 8 Connecticut 9 Delaware 10 District of Columbia 11 Florida 12 Georgia 13-14 Hawaii 15 Illinois 16-17 Louisiana
More informationBEFORE THE INSURANCE COMMISSIONER OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Respondents. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the Insurance Commissioner of the State of
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE Consumer Law Unit Wen Chao SBN: 00 S. Spring Street, th Floor Los Angeles, CA 00 Telephone: --0 Email: wen.chao@insurance.ca.gov Attorney for The California Department
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Debra Thompson, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 1227 C.D. 2016 : Submitted: January 13, 2017 Workers Compensation Appeal : Board (Exelon Corporation), : Respondent :
More informationFourteenth Court of Appeals
Affirmed and Opinion filed August 1, 2017. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-16-00263-CV RON POUNDS, Appellant V. LIBERTY LLOYDS OF TEXAS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee On Appeal from the 215th District
More informationSenate Bill No. 818 CHAPTER 404
Senate Bill No. 818 CHAPTER 404 An act to amend Section 2924 of, to amend and repeal Sections 2923.4, 2923.5, 2923.6, 2923.7, 2924.12, 2924.15, and 2924.17 of, to add Sections 2923.55, 2924.9, 2924.10,
More informationBrokerage Agreement Between Standard Lines Brokerage, Inc. (Hereinafter called SLB) and. (Hereinafter called Agency)
Brokerage Agreement Between Standard Lines Brokerage, Inc. (Hereinafter called SLB) and (Hereinafter called Agency) Agency s Federal Identification Number THIS BROKERAGE AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is made
More informationSEC. 5. SMALL CASE PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING COMPETENT AUTHORITY ASSISTANCE.01 General.02 Small Case Standards.03 Small Case Filing Procedure
26 CFR 601.201: Rulings and determination letters. Rev. Proc. 96 13 OUTLINE SECTION 1. PURPOSE OF MUTUAL AGREEMENT PROCESS SEC. 2. SCOPE Suspension.02 Requests for Assistance.03 U.S. Competent Authority.04
More informationCOLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2012 COA 160. Kyle W. Larson Enterprises, Inc., Roofing Experts, d/b/a The Roofing Experts,
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2012 COA 160 Court of Appeals No. 11CA2205 City and County of Denver District Court No. 10CV6064 Honorable Ann B. Frick, Judge Kyle W. Larson Enterprises, Inc., Roofing Experts,
More informationGROUP COVERAGE DISCONTINUANCE AND REPLACEMENT MODEL REGULATION
Table of Contents Model Regulation Service October 2002 GROUP COVERAGE DISCONTINUANCE AND REPLACEMENT MODEL REGULATION Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. Section 5. Section 6. Section 7. Section
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 97 Article 4 1
Article 4. North Carolina Self-Insurance Security Association. 97-130. Definitions. As used in this Article: (1) "Association" means the North Carolina Self-Insurance Security Association established by
More informationFLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE TARGET MARKET CONDUCT REPORT OF PENN TREATY NETWORK AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY AS OF June 30, 2000 DIVISION OF INSURER SERVICES BUREAU OF LIFE AND HEALTH INSURER SOLVENCY
More informationCALIFORNIA FAIR CLAIMS SETTLEMENT CERTIFICATION
CALIFORNIA FAIR CLAIMS SETTLEMENT CERTIFICATION This course provides third party annual certification of compliance with California Fair Claims Settlement Training Regulations: Title 10, Chapter 5. TO
More informationCASE NO. 1D Roy W. Jordan, Jr., of Roy W. Jordan, Jr., P.A., West Palm Beach, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA SUSAN GENA, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D11-1783
More informationState Tax Return PENALTIES FOR GEORGIA TAX RETURN PREPARERS
June 2009 State Tax Return Volume 16 Number 2 PENALTIES FOR GEORGIA TAX RETURN PREPARERS E. Kendrick Smith Shane A. Lord Atlanta Atlanta (404) 581-8343 (404) 581-8055 On March 30, 2009, the Georgia General
More informationOklahoma's Insurance Business Transfer Act: Objections Overruled?
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Oklahoma's Insurance Business Transfer Act:
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D CORRECTED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2008 PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. Case No. 5D07-1176 CORRECTED RURAL/METRO
More informationREGISTRATION AND REGULATION OF THIRD PARTY ADMINISTRATORS (TPAs) (An NAIC Guideline)
REGISTRATION AND REGULATION OF THIRD PARTY ADMINISTRATORS (TPAs) (An NAIC Guideline) This Guideline, offered in two versions, is a revision of the Third Party Administrator Statute, which was first adopted
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 11-0483 444444444444 CHRISTUS HEALTH GULF COAST, ET AL., PETITIONERS, v. AETNA, INC. AND AETNA HEALTH, INC., RESPONDENTS 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444
More informationCHAPTER 22 MISSISSIPPI NONPROFIT DEBT MANAGEMENT SERVICES ACT [REPEALED EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2006] Section
Source: Mississippi Code/TITLE 81 BANKS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS/CHAPTER 22 MISSISSIPPI NONPROFIT DEBT MANAGEMENT SERVICES ACT [REPEALED EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2006] CHAPTER 22 MISSISSIPPI NONPROFIT DEBT
More informationMICHIGAN ASSIGNED CLAIMS PLAN
MICHIGAN ASSIGNED CLAIMS PLAN 1 Sec. 1. PURPOSES The Michigan Automobile Insurance Placement Facility (hereinafter referred to as MAIPF ) shall adopt, implement and maintain an assigned claims plan (hereinafter
More informationIPT 2017 Sales Tax Symposium San Antonio, Texas. I Scream, You Scream, We All Scream For Resale?
IPT 2017 Sales Tax Symposium San Antonio, Texas I Scream, You Scream, We All Scream For Resale? Presenters Jennifer White Attorney Reed Smith LLP 212.521.5406 jwhite@reedsmith.com Pamela Wegner Sales &
More informationINSURANCE COVERAGE COUNSEL
INSURANCE COVERAGE COUNSEL 2601 AIRPORT DR., SUITE 360 TORRANCE, CA 90505 tel: 310.784.2443 fax: 310.784.2444 www.bolender-firm.com 1. What does it mean to say someone is Cumis counsel or independent counsel?
More informationPORT ADMINISTRATION AND LEGAL ISSUES INSURANCE RECOVERY FOR HURRICANES AND OTHER NATURAL DISASTERS
PORT ADMINISTRATION AND LEGAL ISSUES American Association of Port Authorities February 12, 2007 INSURANCE RECOVERY FOR HURRICANES AND OTHER NATURAL DISASTERS Rhonda D. Orin Anderson Kill & Olick, L.L.P.
More informationRevenue Gain or (Loss) F.Y F.Y F.Y F.Y (000 s) General Fund $0 $0 $0 $0
Department Technical Bill February 27, 2004 Separate Official Fiscal Note Requested Fiscal Impact DOR Administrative Costs/Savings Yes No Department of Revenue Analysis of H.F. 2300 (Abrams) Revenue Gain
More informationFair Claims Settlement Practices Regulations. California Code of Regulations. Title 10, Chapter 5, Subchapter 7.5. Article 1
Fair Claims Settlement Practices Regulations California Code of Regulations Title 10, Chapter 5, Subchapter 7.5. Article 1 2695.7. (8-30-2006) (a) No insurer shall discriminate in its claims settlement
More informationFINANCE COMMISSION OF TEXAS TITLE 7. BANKING AND SECURITIES CHAPTER 7. TEXAS FINANCIAL EDUCATION ENDOWMENT FUND
TITLE 7. BANKING AND SECURITIES PART 1. TEXAS FINANCE COMMISSION OF CHAPTER 7. TEXAS FINANCIAL EDUCATION ENDOWMENT FUND 7 TAC 7.101-7.105 The Finance Commission of Texas (commission) proposes new 7 TAC,
More informationEssential Protections in the Claims Process
Essential Protections in the Claims Process Essential Protections for Policyholders is a project of the Rutgers Center for Risk and Responsibility at Rutgers Law School in cooperation with United Policyholders.
More informationProtection Against Abusive Interest Rates for Small Dollar Loan Products 50-State Detail (Scorecard based on data as of 1/15/08)
Protection Against Abusive Interest Rates for Small Dollar Loan Products 50-State Detail (Scorecard based on data as of 1/15/08) Alaska State Performance Category APR Comment $250, 2-week payday 443 $500,
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS ST. JOHN MACOMB OAKLAND HOSPITAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, FOR PUBLICATION December 8, 2016 9:00 a.m. v No. 329056 Macomb Circuit Court STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE LC No.
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2011
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2011 Opinion filed May 25, 2011. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D11-180 Lower Tribunal No. 10-38278
More informationWHAT DOES IT MEAN TO EXHAUST AN UNDERLYING LAYER OF INSURANCE?
WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO EXHAUST AN UNDERLYING LAYER OF INSURANCE? By Robert M. Hall Mr. Hall is an attorney, a former law firm partner, a former insurance and reinsurance executive and acts as an insurance
More informationM E M O R A N D U M. Executive Summary
M E M O R A N D U M From: Thomas J. Nichols, Esq. Date: March 12, 2019 Re: 2017 Wisconsin Act 368 Authority Executive Summary State income taxes paid by S corporations and partnerships, limited liability
More informationShort Term Disability Claim Form
Short Term Disability Claim Form Important notice to employee Please read carefully: You or someone acting on your behalf should complete Section 1 and then have your employer complete Section 2. Have
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. KUBICKI DRAPER, LLP, a law firm, Appellee. No. 4D17-2889 [January 23, 2019] Appeal from the Circuit
More informationInsurance Bad Faith MEALEY S LITIGATION REPORT. A commentary article reprinted from the November 24, 2010 issue of Mealey s Litigation Report:
MEALEY S LITIGATION REPORT Insurance Bad Faith Pitfalls For The Unwary: The Use Of Releases To Preserve Or Extinguish Any Potential Bad-Faith Claims Between The Primary And Excess Insurance Carriers by
More informationSUGGESTED TRUST PROTECTOR LANGUAGE Warning Legal Advice should be sought before any language is inserted into a Trust
SUGGESTED TRUST PROTECTOR LANGUAGE Warning Legal Advice should be sought before any language is inserted into a Trust 1. Trust Protector. The Trust Protector is to assist, if needed, in protecting the
More informationRULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INSURANCE DIVISION OF INSURANCE CHAPTER SELF-INSURED WORKERS COMPENSATION SINGLE EMPLOYERS
RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INSURANCE DIVISION OF INSURANCE CHAPTER 0780-1-83 SELF-INSURED WORKERS COMPENSATION SINGLE EMPLOYERS TABLE OF CONTENTS 0780-1-83-.01 Scope and Purpose 0780-1-83-.10
More information2017 HB 2104 UNINSURED AND UNDERINSURED MOTORIST COVERAGE AND INSURANCE SETOFF
kslegres@klrd.ks.gov 68-West Statehouse, 300 SW 10th Ave. Topeka, Kansas 66612-1504 (785) 296-3181 FAX (785) 296-3824 http://www.kslegislature.org/klrd To: Special Committee on Financial Institutions and
More informationCOLLECTION AGENCY ERRORS & OMISSIONS APPLICATION
Kinsale Insurance Company P. O. Box 17008 Richmond, VA 23226 (804) 289-1300 www.kinsaleins.com COLLECTION AGENCY ERRORS & OMISSIONS APPLICATION APPLICANT S INFORMATION 1. Legal name of the business who
More informationFLORIDA DEPARTMENT INSURANCE
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE TARGET MARKET CONDUCT REPORT OF UNITED BENEFIT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2000 DIVISION OF INSURER SERVICES BUREAU OF LIFE AND HEALTH INSURER SOLVENCY
More informationAvailable at:
Available at: http://www.dfs.ny.gov/legal/regulations/emergency/banking/ar419tx.htm Regulations Adopted on an Emergency Basis Part 419. Servicing Mortgage Loans: Business Conduct Rules (Statutory Authority:
More informationInsurance Bad Faith. Three Is A Crowd: Revisiting The Third Party Beneficiary Doctrine MEALEY S TM LITIGATION REPORT
MEALEY S TM LITIGATION REPORT Insurance Bad Faith Three Is A Crowd: Revisiting The Third Party Beneficiary Doctrine by Fay E. Ryan and Anita Devi P. Misir Butler Pappas Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP A commentary
More informationno later than October 16, 2006.
{Date} {Name} {Fname} {Lname} {Address1} {Address2} {City}, {ST} {Zip} Dear (Fname} {Lname}, Enclosed please find information that has been prepared for you by AIM Investments as part of our implementation
More informationTitle 24-A: MAINE INSURANCE CODE
Title 24-A: MAINE INSURANCE CODE Chapter 73: CONTINUING CARE RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES Table of Contents Section 6201. DEFINITIONS... 3 Section 6202. CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY REQUIRED... 5 Section 6203. REQUIREMENTS
More informationMISCELLANEOUS PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY APPLICATION
MISCELLANEOUS PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY APPLICATION CLAIMS MADE AND REPORTED FORM ALL QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED IN FULL. APPLICATION MUST BE SIGNED AND DATED BY THE PRINCIPAL, OFFICER OR PARTNER Applicant
More informationPART 8 DUTIES AND POWERS OF TRUSTEE General Comment
PART 8 DUTIES AND POWERS OF TRUSTEE General Comment This article states the fundamental duties of a trustee and lists the trustee s powers. The duties listed are not new, but how the particular duties
More informationReasonable Accommodations for Pregnant Workers: State and Local Laws
Reasonable Accommodations for Pregnant Workers: State and Local Laws NOVEMBER 2017 Twenty-two states, the District of Columbia and four cities have passed laws requiring some employers to provide reasonable
More informationNavigating the Waters of Large SIRs and Deductibles
2016 CLM Annual Conference April 6-8, 2016 Orlando, FL Navigating the Waters of Large SIRs and Deductibles I. Issue: Is There a Duty to Defend Before the SIR is Satisfied? A. California In Evanston Ins.
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/sonar/sonar.asp STATE OF MINNESOTA
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida CANADY, J. No. SC15-519 LEANDRO DE LA FUENTE, et al., Petitioners, vs. FLORIDA INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION, Respondent. [October 20, 2016] In this case, we consider the scope
More informationCircuit Court for Frederick County Case No.: 10-C UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2017
Circuit Court for Frederick County Case No.: 10-C-02-000895 UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 1100 September Term, 2017 ALLAN M. PICKETT, et al. v. FREDERICK CITY MARYLAND, et
More information