When an Energy Efficiency Program Grows by Leaps and Bounds
|
|
- August Richardson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 When an Energy Efficiency Program Grows by Leaps and Bounds Erinn Monroe, Commonwealth Edison Charles Budd, KEMA ABSTRACT ComEd is a transmission and distribution utility with 5,300 miles of overhead transmission lines and 36,000 miles of overhead distribution and 29,000 miles of underground lines. ComEd s service territory covers 11,411 square miles in Northern Illinois including the city of Chicago. ComEd serves about 70% of the population of Illinois, about 3.8 million customers. ComEd s peak system demand is just under 23,000 Megawatts. Spurred on by Illinois new energy efficiency legislation in 2008, ComEd s Smart Ideas for Your Business program doubled its goals between Year One and Year Two, and is slated for an additional 50% increase for Year 3. Over the course of the three program years, ComEd expects to help customers save 486 net GWh. With funding capped and performance penalties in place, the program raced through available Year One funding in four months, and Year Two s in less than six months. This paper will discuss how ComEd managed the challenges of high program growth in a previously untapped market, managed customer expectations, developed market channel partners and exceeded program goals while remaining under strict budget caps. ComEd also employed tactics throughout the program year to help manage customer interest and build a solid framework for a growing program. We will summarize two full years of program operations statistics, comparing Year Two experience to the initial start-up year ComEd recognized and addressed key trends and changes, including significant changes in the average size of projects submitted, most popular energy efficiency measures, trade ally performance, and the realities of program implementation vs. original program design. To meet increased goals for the 3 rd program year, ComEd has increased its marketing through customer case studies, trade ally events, and increased Account Manager efforts. Legislative Background Enactment of Public Act created a new Section of the Illinois Public Utilities Act, and, among other things, set forth new energy efficiency and demand response goals. Section s goals vaulted Illinois into the top-tier of states with respect to required investment in energy efficiency and, within four years, the levels of demand-side program investment and energy efficiency savings realized will place Illinois second to only California. By 2011, ComEd is projected to be investing more in customer energy management than every utility in the country except for Pacific Gas & Electric and Southern California Edison. i The legislation provides for funding and programs to be provided in ComEd s service territory by ComEd and the Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity (DCEO) on roughly a 75/25 split. The statutory program goals (across business and residential) are shown in the Table 1. ii 5-276
2 Statutory Portfolio Goals in First Three Program Years (Residential and Business) Annual Goal Total Spending Screen ($M) $39.4 $81.6 $126.7 $247.7 Maximum increase in per kwh rate 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 3.0% Energy Efficiency Goal (MWh) 188, , ,077 1,166,497 Incremental % of energy 0.2% 0.4% 0.6% 1.2% delivered ComEd Goal (MWh) 148, , , ,100 DECO Goal (MWh) 39,887 81, , ,397 Table 1-Goals and Budget: Source ComEd Energy Efficiency and Demand Response Plan Implementation Challenges There is no doubt that this legislation was good for energy efficiency in Illinois; however, the statute did include some elements that made implementing the programs challenging. Strict spending caps, limits on banking savings from one year to the next and measure-level costeffectiveness requirements created challenges for the implementation team. In addition the legislation imposed significant penalties for underperformance (and no incentive if the utility was to exceed the goal). Illinois is a deregulated market so there is no integrated resource or least-cost planning process. The generation mix is determined by the choices customers make when purchasing from various suppliers. Energy efficiency budgets and goals in Illinois are set through legislation. The maximum amount that can be collected under the law can result in a per kwh increase of 0.5% per kwh for customers each year for three years starting in iii This not to exceed budget limits for each year of the program; any spending beyond this is not recoverable. In addition, the legislation limits the amount of savings that a utility can carry over from one year to the next or bank to maximum of 10% of the savings. If ComEd were to exceed the goal by 20% only half of those kwh could be applied to the next year s goal. In addition the company runs the risk that the cost incurred by going above 110% of the goal would not be considered recoverable even if it is below the spending screens. Limited yearly funding and the inability to carry projects over between years effectively meant that the program was to be implemented as three separate one-year programs instead of as a three-year program. Also, the statute requires that every measure incentivized through the programs pass the total resource cost (TRC) test. As a result, the utility cannot bundle less cost-effective measures with those that are more cost-effective. This limited the company s ability to offer incentives on emerging technologies or deeper, whole building offerings. Finally, the Illinois legislation sets fourth penalties should the utilities not make the goal and does not include any incentives for exceeding the goal. The penalty for missing the goal in the second year would be a $665,000 contribution to the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP). The penalty for missing the goal the third year (any every subsequent threeyear period thereafter) is again a $665,000 contribution to LIHEAP and the transfer of the program to the Illinois Power Agency. Given these constraints, the program needed to be able to hit the annual goals within the budget but not exceed them or face a steep penalty. The final program design needed consider several issues including: 5-277
3 Annual spending caps and limited available funding in early years of program Unknown pent-up demand Significant ramp-up (goals that escalate every year) Measure level TRC Penalties for underperformance Program Plan and Design ComEd developed a portfolio of energy efficiency and demand response programs to achieve the ambitions goals. The programs spanned all customer classes and covered a diverse set of energy efficiency and demand response technologies and measures. The business sector energy efficiency programs, ComEd Smart Ideas for Your Business, offer prescriptive, custom, new construction, and retro-commissioning incentives. Prescriptive and custom incentives were launched in Year One with new construction and retro-commissioning phased in later. This paper will focus on the prescriptive and custom elements of the program because they account for up to 90% of the program activity. The three-year budgets and goals are shown in the following tables: iv Prescriptive/Custom Program Budget Program Element Total C&I Prescriptive Incentives $6,970K $13.9M $27M $47.9M Custom Incentives $2,520K $10.5M $13.4M $26.4M Totals $9.5M $24.3M $40.4M $74.3M Table 2- Prescriptive and custom budget. Source: ComEd Energy Efficiency and Demand Response Plan Prescriptive/Custom Program Savings Goals Program Element MWh Total C&I Prescriptive Incentives 43,255 86, , ,378 Custom Incentives 18,932 74,475 95, ,651 Totals 62, , , Table 3- Savings Goals Source: ComEd Energy Efficiency and Demand Response Plan Prior to the launch of these programs, there were no programs in the ComEd service territory. The staff expected a massive market response due to significant pent-up demand, but there was no guarantee that this would be the case. If there was inadequate demand the team would need to market the programs heavily or if the demand was overwhelming the budget would be exhausted. During the program design process the team integrated several controls intended to either ramp up or dial back the program depending on the market response. Even with these controls in place the program rapidly oversubscribed in the first year and the team needed to rapidly develop and implement a wait list process. In general, projects followed the process flow outlined in Figure
4 Funds Reservation There were two types of applications (pre-approval or final). Customers could submit a pre-approval application to reserve funds before the project was initiated or submit a final application after the project was completed. There were only a few measures that required preapproval, however ComEd encouraged all customers to receive reservations before initiating projects to ensure that funds would be available. Fig. 1 Funds Reservation Process Application Flow Chart Most applications can enter at either point A or Point. in the above figure. Point A represents projects that received a reservation prior to initiating a project and point F represented projects that did not. Only a few measures required a reservation but ComEd encouraged all customers to obtain a reservation before moving forward with their projects. This was to ensure customers would not complete a project without first securing funding. Reservation Expiration Deadlines Upon receiving a reservation customers were given 90 days to complete their projects. This rather short timeline was to ensure that projects were moving forward. If the project was not moving forward (as documented by purchase orders and signed contracts) then the funding was released and made available to the next customer. A 90 day reservation window is very short, but the ComEd staff felt this was necessary because of the heavy demand and to ensure the very limited funding was not tied up in projects that weren t moving forward. The funds reservation process and tight expiration deadlines proved very useful tools in the ramp up/dial back scenario. At the same time this mechanism was more favorable to projects with shorter lead times and shut out projects that require longer planning and implementation timelines
5 Prescriptive/Custom Split The original plan filed with the commission called for separate budgets and goals for prescriptive and custom incentives however, in the final program design the team decided to combine the budgets. The team decided that custom and prescriptive were really simply two different ways to access the same funding and were not separate programs. In addition the team felt that ramping-up and/or dialing-back two separate programs would be too difficult to manage in the first few years. Results from Year One In the first year of the program the response was dramatic. Figure 2 shows the week-byweek status of applications in the program and illustrates how quickly the prescriptive and custom incentives became fully subscribed. The various colors of the bars indicate the different statuses (under review, reserved, paid or wait listed) of the applications throughout the year. Figure 2-Year One Reservations Paid and Reserved Application Statuses Year One Oversubscription and Wait List The overwhelming response brought about many challenges including; How do you wind down a program once its out in the market? In order to mitigate the attrition risk, the team decided to over-reserve the incentive funds by 20%. When the program reached 120% of goal in paid and reserved projects the team instituted a wait list policy. This allowed customers to queue up projects to receive incentive funding that would be made available if another project dropped out. Even after instituting a wait list the flow of applications remained high and in November the program stopped accepting applications altogether. It s important to note that the payments significantly lagged behind reservations, even given the 90 day reservation deadline. The green portions of the bar in Figure 1 (which represent paid projects) show a slow and steady incline through the year. The yellow and blue portions of the bar (which represent projects that are reserved and under review ) show a much steeper increase from the beginning of the program year and then a gradual leveling off as the projects moved from reserved to paid. One reason that the payments lagged behind the reservations 5-280
6 was that many customers requested and received extensions. Extensions were only granted when a customer could produce documentation proving that the project was moving forward (for example purchase orders). The table also reflects the natural attrition rates of projects that are cancelled throughout the program year. Prevalence of Prescriptive Lighting Projects In the original plan filed with the Commission ComEd estimated that about a quarter of the incentive budget would go to custom projects. Prescriptive projects tend to be smaller and less complicated than custom projects and they also typically require shorter lead times. Because the team combined the budgets for prescriptive and custom incentives and instituted a 90 day reservation expiration deadline, more than 90% of the funding went to prescriptive projects. Fig. 3 Custom/Prescriptive Incentive Split Year One Custom/Prescriptive Split Custom 9% Prescriptive 91% Within prescriptive, the vast majority (88%) of the projects completed were lighting related. Figure 4 shows the breakdown in savings that came from the different technology categories in custom and prescriptive. Although a more balanced portfolio would have been preferred, a potential study that was completed following the launch of Year One aligned almost exactly with the results that ComEd achieved. v Fig. 4- Technology breakdown Refrigeration 0.5% Technology Breakdown Compressed Air 0.8% Process 2.5% HVAC 7.8% Motors 0.1% Lighting 88% 5-281
7 Communication Challenges Before the programs launched ComEd held a number of workshops to explain how the programs would work but there was still a lot of confusion in the market. Some trade allies and customers were skeptical and didn t understand why a utility would pay customers to use less of the product they sell. They were also confused about how incentive programs work; many customers thought the incentives were tax credits from the federal government or bill credits. Unfortunately just as many trade allies were getting up to speed on how to use the program, the funding started to dry up and ComEd had to scramble to come up with a plan to handle the incoming applications and to communicate the funding levels. ComEd communicated the wait list process by posting a message on the ComEd website, sending customers and trade allies letters and hosting a webinar to explain how the wait list process would work. Even with these communications, customers and trade allies called to continually check the status of their wait listed applications and ask various questions about the wait list process. Changes Made for Year Two For Program Year Two of Smart Ideas for Your Business, the budget and goals almost doubled: The goal was 161 net GWh and the incentive budget was $17 million. The team assumed that a wait list would again be necessary, and, based on the lessons learned in Year One, made a number of changes in order to diversify the portfolio, improve communication, manage risk and control the wait list process. Diversify the Portfolio The first change was to reduce the incentive on the program s most popular project: upgrading high intensity discharge (HID) fixtures to T8 or T5 fluorescent fixtures with electronic ballasts, generally in highbay applications. The incentive went from $0.40 to $0.30 per kwh reduced. In addition, the incentive was capped at $100 per fixture. This had little effect on the number of highbay projects, and made more funds available for other projects. The second change was to target high-value non-lighting projects with deliberate outreach efforts. An outreach manager was added to the team, and marketing efforts focused on supporting non-lighting trade allies. Outreach efforts targeted compressed air projects and HVAC VSD projects in particular. Finally, when the wait list was implemented in December of Program Year Two, it applied only to lighting projects. This allowed non-lighting projects access to the funding that had been reserved too quickly in the first year of the program. Improve Communication To reduce the number of questions and complaints in Year Two, a communications plan was developed in advance and put in place in anticipation of the program starting a wait list. Trade allies were able to track the available of funds on the ComEd web site by checking the Fund-o-Meter a thermometer-style graphic that was updated weekly. The trade ally e
8 newsletter also provided updates. Finally, a set of talking points with the wait list rules, explanations and answers to potential questions was prepared in advance. When the wait list was called on December 2, the communications plan was implemented: All contractors with projects in the program in Program Year Two received an letter from the vice president of Marketing and Environmental Programs (Val Jensen). The was followed by an issue of the trade ally newsletter with more detail and FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions). The rules and FAQs were posted on the ComEd web site. Two webinars presented the rules and covered questions. A message was placed under the Fund-o-Meter on the ComEd website explaining the status of funds. Attendance at the two webinars was low compared with attendance at other webinars (less than 100 total), which indicated that the wait list information that had been sent was clear. Subsequently there were questions about whether non-lighting projects were on the wait list, showing that some trade allies assumed that the Year Two wait list process was identical to the Year One process. Improved Risk Management One of the challenges in Year One was deciding when to begin putting projects on a wait list. There is always some attrition due to projects being cancelled or delayed. ComEd knew that it would be necessary to accept more reservations than the final budget could allow but it was difficult to know exactly how far over the goal and budget ComEd could target. Any spending above the legislatively mandated budget and goal could be considered imprudent and the company faced a penalty if it fell short of the goal. Based on the experience in Year One ComEd know that pre-approval applications provided a good leading indicator of completed projects. A review of cancelled projects, including the project size and when in the process the project was cancelled, enabled the team to assign a probability of completion to the projects in the preapproval stage. In addition to the probability of cancellation, the evaluation results from the first year were integrated into the probability number when they became available. Applying the probability to projects in each application status gave a more accurate reading of where the program was in terms of budget and kwh savings. Arriving at the probability number was part data analysis and part experience, and the results were used to determine timing of the wait list. Figure 5 shows the probability chart that ComEd used to get a more accurate prediction of the final paid projects and savings achieved
9 Fig. 5- Probability Table This is a snapshot of the actual report that ComEd used to project progress to goal. the column on the left shows the status of the applications. The column titled Projected Incentive shows the incentives that would be paid after all applicable caps were applied. The Probability column shows the probabilities that were applied to the various statuses and the far right columns titled kwh and Incentive show the final savings and incentive that could be expected from projects in each of the statuses. The probabilities were continually updated as new information became available. Year Two Results As expected, the program was also oversubscribed in Year Two. With about double the budget in incentives the program was able to last an additional three months. Just as the Smart Idea team started the year with lessons learned, the trade allies had learned from the tumultuous first year. Unfortunately, the lesson many trade allies had learned was: Get applications in as soon as possible, whether the project is fully defined or not. This eagerness to get funds reserved lead to a larger volume of incomplete or incorrect applications which slowed the process to some extent. Other patterns seen in Program Year Two: More projects, smaller projects Fewer projects from program trade allies, more projects from unaffiliated contractors and in-house staff Portfolio was still lighting heavy despite direct outreach to customers and non-lighting trade allies and wait listing lighting projects. Also as you can see in Figure 6, far fewer projects were placed on the wait list in Year Two (as indicted by the red portion of the bars). As in Year One the amount of projects reserved or under-review (yellow and blue portions of the bar) increased steeply at the beginning of the year while payments (indicated by the green bar) lagged behind
10 Figure 6- Application Statuses in Year Two Year Two Application Status Source: ComEd tracking scorecard Conclusions Utilities launching programs into new markets face unique challenges. In ComEd s case this was exacerbated by funding limits and unknown pent-up demand. In the first two years of implementation the programs became quickly oversubscribed leaving ComEd to shut the programs down. One key lesson that ComEd learned was how to manage massive demand, oversubscription and risk. Dealing with legislative and regulatory constraints. All programs are subject to various constraints set forth in the laws and policies governing them. In the case of ComEd the mechanism created to limit the energy efficiency spend could not fund the programs adequately to keep pace with the demand. This was exacerbated by the fact that the program was established as three separate one-year programs with distinct annual goals and budgets with limited carryover between years; more flexibility would have allowed the program to better respond to the market. Managing risk. The Illinois law that governs the utility-run energy efficiency programs contains significant penalties for under performance and no incentives for overachievement. In fact, if the programs were too successful and overshot the goal by more than 10% ComEd could have feasibly run the risk of being unable to recover costs associated with over achievement; leaving little room for error. Therefore it was in ComEd s best interest to come out of the gates strong and fast and then shut the program off when the goal was in reach. It also motivated ComEd to implement a very short (90 day) reservation limit. This lead to confusion in the market and some (albeit luckily minor) customer dissatisfaction. Additionally because of uncertainty of the market, it was difficult to know exactly when to shut the programs down. To manage this ComEd created a probability factor to model the progress toward the goals. This model was 5-285
11 continually updated as new information and data became available. Data from previous years of experience is a very valuable tool for forecasting what will happen in the future. Managing oversubscription. Although ComEd views this as becoming less of a problem when the budgets start to keep pace with demand, oversubscription was a serious issue in the first two years of program implantation. ComEd encouraged all customers to reserve funding before starting the project in order to lock up funding. With the reserved projects approaching the budget limit and an unknown attrition rate ComEd instituted a wait list. Projects off the wait list would be accepted if other projects with reservations dropped out. The wait list was instituted after ComEd reached 120% in reserved, paid and underreview projects. Communicating with customers and trade allies. Communication is critical. For ComEd, customers and trade allies were totally unfamiliar with how utility incentive programs work and were also a little skeptical. In the first year ComEd made an effort very early on to educate customers and trade allies about how the programs work only to have to re-educate them a few months later when the funding began to dry up and the program was reaching its goal. ComEd used this learning and improved its communication plan for the second year. ComEd used web, , mail and webinars to communicate program updates and changes. Diversifying the portfolio. Program administrators in new markets can expect to see a large portion of their savings to come from lighting projects. Lighting projects generally have shorter planning periods and very quick simple paybacks. ComEd expected this as well. In the first year the Smart Ideas team wasn t sure how the market would respond and rules were put in place that favored projects that could be planned and implemented quickly. To diversify the portfolio for the second year ComEd adjusted incentives and wait listed only lighting projects. With many new utilities joining the energy efficiency market and existing programs seeing increased budgets and goals, it is an exciting time to be in the energy efficiency industry. However, these rapidly increasing goals and budgets bring about a whole host of new challenges for program implementers. Illinois has taken a big step forward in energy efficiency and as funding increases and stakeholders see the positive impacts of these programs hopefully we can keep moving forward. References i Commonwealth Edison Company s Energy Efficiency and Demand Response Plan, Docket No , ComEd Ex. 1.0, November 15, 2007, page 1. ii Ibid, page 2. iii State of Illinois, Illinois Commerce Commission iv ComEd Commercial and Industrial Energy Efficiency Incentive Program Implementation Request for Proposals, page 16 v Dimetrosky, Scott. Et al.. (2009). Assessment of Energy Efficiency and Load Management Potential ( ) Prepared for Commonwealth Edison by The Cadmus Group, Inc
Trade Allies Poised for ComEd
Trade Allies Poised for ComEd Beyond Lighting Erinn Monroe ACEEE Energy Efficiency as a Resource Chicago, IL Trade Allies Poised for ComEd: Beyond Lighting Quick Launch Recruiting and training trade allies
FIVE YEAR PLAN FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY
FIVE YEAR PLAN FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY Executive Summary Prepared for: Holy Cross Energy Navigant Consulting, Inc. 1375 Walnut Street Suite 200 Boulder, CO 80302 303.728.2500 www.navigant.com July 15, 2011
Home Energy Reports of Low-Income vs. Standard Households: A Parable of the Tortoise and the Hare?
Home Energy Reports of Low-Income vs. Standard Households: A Parable of the Tortoise and the Hare? Anne West, Cadmus, Portland, OR Jim Stewart, Ph.D., Cadmus, Portland, OR Masumi Izawa, Cadmus, Portland,
Quarterly Report to the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Quarterly Report to the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission For the Period September 1, 2015 through November 30, 2015 Program Year 7, Quarter 2 For Pennsylvania Act 129 of 2008 Energy Efficiency and
(b) There are no additional key aspects of program performance goals. (c) There are no updates to the forecast of net energy and demand impacts.
Program Administrator: The Brooklyn Union Gas Company d/b/a National Grid NY Program/Project: Residential High-Efficiency Heating and Water Heating and Controls Program Reporting period: Quarter 4 (October
Don Fishback's ODDS Burning Fuse. Click Here for a printable PDF. INSTRUCTIONS and FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Don Fishback's ODDS Burning Fuse Click Here for a printable PDF INSTRUCTIONS and FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS In all the years that I've been teaching options trading and developing analysis services, I
Energy Efficiency Resource Ramping Assumptions
Energy Efficiency Resource Ramping Assumptions Class 2 DSM Resource Ramping This document presents the methods used by The Cadmus Group, Inc. (Cadmus) and the Energy Trust of Oregon (Energy Trust) to develop
Community-Solar Utility Programs
Community-Solar Utility Programs Andrea Romano, CSVP Team Consultant Navigant Consulting November 2015 Community Solar Value Project interviewed five program managers at utilities across the United States
DRAFT VILLAGE OF MUNDELEIN ELECTRIC POWER AGGREGATION. Plan of Operation and Governance
DRAFT VILLAGE OF MUNDELEIN ELECTRIC POWER AGGREGATION Plan of Operation and Governance I. INTRODUCTION Public Act 96-1076 amended the Illinois Power Agreement Act by adding Section 1-92 to Chapter 20,
Planned Actual Planned Adjusted
Section I: Program Overview A. Program Summary Program Description The Commercial Prescriptive Lighting Program is a contractor-driven program that provides financial incentives to commercial and industrial
Energy Conservation Resource Strategy
Energy Conservation Resource Strategy 2008-2012 April 15, 2008 In December 2004, EWEB adopted the most recent update to the Integrated Electric Resource Plan (IERP). Consistent with EWEB s three prior
Quarterly Report to the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Quarterly Report to the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission For the Period September 1, 2015 through November 30, 2015 Program Year 7, Quarter 2 For Pennsylvania Act 129 of 2008 Energy Efficiency and
Quarterly Report to the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Quarterly Report to the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission For the Period June 1, 2015 through August 31, 2015 Program Year 7, Quarter 1 For Pennsylvania Act 129 of 2008 Energy Efficiency and Conservation
A New Approach to Public Safety Pension Funding
A New Approach to Public Safety Pension Funding Objectives Identify key assumptions impacting annual pension funding requirements; Consider alternative approaches to funding public safety pensions; and
Quarterly Report to the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Quarterly Report to the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission For the Period November 05 through February 06 Program Year 7, Quarter For Pennsylvania Act 9 of 008 Energy Efficiency and Conservation Plan
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO Proceeding No. A- E IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF BLACK HILLS/COLORADO ELECTRIC UTILITY COMPANY, LP FOR APPROVAL OF ITS ELECTRIC DEMAND
Market Mastery Protégé Program Method 1 Part 1
Method 1 Part 1 Slide 2: Welcome back to the Market Mastery Protégé Program. This is Method 1. Slide 3: Method 1: understand how to trade Method 1 including identifying set up conditions, when to enter
KOJZAREK, Laesch, Donahue, Davoust, Lewis, Barreiro, Allan. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTEE County Board Room Thursday, May 15, :00 a.m.
KOJZAREK, Laesch, Donahue, Davoust, Lewis, Barreiro, Allan ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTEE County Board Room Thursday, May 15, 2014 9:00 a.m. AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: April 10,
HERO Program Profile Final Report
HERO Program Profile Final Report CALMAC ID: PGE0388.01 October 3, 2016 Pacific Gas and Electric Company, San Diego Gas & Electric, Southern California Edison, and Southern California Gas Company This
REPORT ON THE COST EFFECTIVENESS AND PROGRESS OF THE SUSTAINABLE BUILDING 2030 STANDARDS
This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp REPORT ON THE COST
(b) There are no additional key aspects of program performance goals. (c) There are no updates to the forecast of net energy and demand impacts.
: Program/Project: Residential High-Efficiency Heating and Water Heating and Controls Program Reporting period: Quarter 4 (October - December) 2011 Report Contact person: Lisa Tallet 1. Program Status
Philadelphia Gas Works Customer Responsibility Program. Final Evaluation Report
Philadelphia Gas Works Customer Responsibility Program Final Evaluation Report February 2006 Table of Contents Table of Contents Executive Summary... i Introduction...i Customer Responsibility Program...
2017 Rate Supported Budgets - Solid Waste Management Services and Recommended 2017 Waste Rates
EX20.23 REPORT FOR ACTION 2017 Rate Supported Budgets - Solid Waste Management Services and Recommended 2017 Waste Rates Date: November 15, 2016 To: Budget Committee, Executive Committee From: General
Load and Billing Impact Findings from California Residential Opt-in TOU Pilots
Load and Billing Impact Findings from California Residential Opt-in TOU Pilots Stephen George, Eric Bell, Aimee Savage, Nexant, San Francisco, CA ABSTRACT Three large investor owned utilities (IOUs) launched
Request for Proposal Seeking Lighting Suppliers to Provide Energy Efficient Lighting Fixtures & Controls
New Jersey Office of Clean Energy Direct Install Program Request for Proposal Seeking Lighting Suppliers to Provide Energy Efficient Lighting Fixtures & Controls Issued by TRC Energy Services Commercial
Boost Collections and Recovery Results With Analytics
Boost Collections and Recovery Results With Analytics As delinquencies continue to rise, predictive analytics focus collections and recovery efforts to maximize returns and minimize loss Number 31 February
BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION
BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PETITION OF UGI UTILITIES, INC. ELECTRIC DIVISION FOR APPROVAL OF ITS ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION PLAN DOCKET NO. M-0- TESTIMONY OF BRIAN J. FITZPATRICK
OREGON STANDARD AVOIDED COST RATES AVOIDED COST PURCHASES FROM ELIGIBLE QUALIFYING FACILITIES Page 1
S ELIGIBLE QUALIFYING FACILITIES Page 1 Available To owners of Qualifying Facilities making sales of electricity to the Company in the State of Oregon. Applicable For power purchased from Base Load and
New Tools for Data-Driven Portfolio Course-Correction Strategies
New Tools for Data-Driven Portfolio Course-Correction Strategies Lee Wood, Ryan Del Balso, Keith Downes, Toben Galvin, Frank Stern; Navigant Nicholas DeDominicis, Marina Geneles; PECO ABSTRACT Meeting
Optimizing Water Infrastructure Investments
Maureen Duffy T: 856-309-4546 maureen.duffy@amwater.com Optimizing Water Infrastructure Investments Introduction In the U.S., water services are often so reliable that many of us do not think twice about
UNIQUE ATTRIBUTES OF RENEWABLE POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENTS
11.11.2009 UNIQUE ATTRIBUTES OF RENEWABLE POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENTS Power Purchase Agreements ( PPA ) are highly negotiated long term agreements through which power producers (often referred to as sellers)
Demo 3 - Forecasting Calculator with F.A.S.T. Graphs. Transcript for video located at:
Demo 3 - Forecasting Calculator with F.A.S.T. Graphs Transcript for video located at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=de29rsru9js This FAST Graphs, Demo Number 3, will look at the FAST Graphs forecasting
The Road to Residential On-Bill Repayment
The Road to Residential On-Bill Repayment Christine Koch, The United Illuminating Company ABSTRACT One of the biggest hurdles to increase the adoption of deeper residential energy efficiency retrofits
Incentive Scenarios in Potential Studies: A Smarter Approach
Incentive Scenarios in Potential Studies: A Smarter Approach Cory Welch, Navigant Consulting, Inc. Denise Richerson-Smith, UNS Energy Corporation ABSTRACT Utilities can easily spend tens or even hundreds
BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION
BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PETITION OF PECO ENERGY : COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF ITS : ACT 129 PHASE III ENERGY : DOCKET NO. M-2015 EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION : PLAN : PETITION OF PECO
Credit collection and default listing March 2018
Credit collection and default listing March 2018 Background EWOV receives and investigates complaints about credit and collection issues, including situations where customers have been default listed,
Following Institutional Footprints
Strategies Following Institutional Footprints Trading Expansions of Range and Volume Equity market cycles provide opportunity in every phase of liquidity. The greatest possibilities are evident when expansion-of-range-and-volume
EEAC EM&V Briefing. Ralph Prahl EEAC Consultant EM&V Team Leader July 9th, 2013
EEAC EM&V Briefing Ralph Prahl EEAC Consultant EM&V Team Leader July 9th, 2013 Organization of Presentation EM&V in Massachusetts: Past, Present and Future Past Background Review of MA EM&V Framework Current
California ISO. Flexible Ramping Product Uncertainty Calculation and Implementation Issues. April 18, 2018
California Independent System Operator Corporation California ISO Flexible Ramping Product Uncertainty Calculation and Implementation Issues April 18, 2018 Prepared by: Kyle Westendorf, Department of Market
Executive Director s Summary Report
Executive Director s Summary Report to the Board of Trustees of the Efficiency Maine Trust July 20, 2016 1. Communications A.) Awareness and Press Outreach Events o Save the date for the Trust s Combined
Pennsylvania s Energy Efficiency Uncapped
Pennsylvania s Energy Efficiency Uncapped Assessing the Potential Impact of Expanding the State s Energy Efficiency Program Beyond the Current Budget Cap Prepared for Keystone Energy Efficiency Alliance
Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No.
Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No. 52806-E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No. 51618-E Rule 22.1 Sheet 1 The following terms and conditions apply to
JOHN MORIKIS: SEAN HENNESSY:
JOHN MORIKIS: You ll be hearing from Jay Davisson, our president of the Americas Group, Cheri Pfeiffer, our president of our Diversified Brands Division, Joel Baxter, our president of our Global Supply
Application Terms & Conditions and Final Payment Agreement
Prescriptive, Self-Direct Custom Program & Self-Direct Application Terms & Conditions and Final Payment Agreement Version: January 1, 2015 January 2017 TERMS AND CONDITIONS AEP Ohio offers Efficient Products
TURN DATA REQUEST-014 SDG&E-SOCALGAS 2019 GRC A /8 SDG&E_SOCALGAS RESPONSE DATE RECEIVED: FEBRUARY 8, 2018 DATE RESPONDED: FEBRUARY 27, 2018
The following questions relate to SDG&E-15, electric distribution O&M. Workpapers relate to the relevant workpapers for this Chapter, SDG&E-15-WP WSpeer. 1. Regarding SDG&E s response to DR-TURN-04, Excel
Settlement Statements and Invoices. IESO Training
Settlement Statements and Invoices IESO Training May 2017 Settlement Statements and Invoices AN IESO MARKETPLACE TRAINING PUBLICATION This guide has been prepared to assist in the IESO training of market
ARMCHAIR INVESTOR (sm) MORNING MARKET NEWSLETTER A TREND-FOLLOWING STRATEGY
5/10/2018 Uptrend. Nasdaq and S&P500 UP for 5 days! Still looking for Volume Thursday Volume 17 #90 ARMCHAIR INVESTOR (sm) MORNING MARKET NEWSLETTER A TREND-FOLLOWING STRATEGY To open the FULL ARMCHAIR
Annual Report to the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission For the period December 2009 to May 2010 Program Year 2009
Annual Report to the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission For the period December 2009 to May 2010 Program Year 2009 For Act 129 of 2008 Energy Efficiency and Conservation Program Prepared by Duquesne
A Lost Revenue Adjustment Mechanism and a Shared Savings Mechanism for Ontario s Electric Utilities
Ontario Energy Board RP-2004-0188 A Lost Revenue Adjustment Mechanism and a Shared Savings Mechanism for Ontario s Electric Utilities Pre-filed Evidence of Jack Gibbons Public Interest Economics On Behalf
Participation: A Performance Goal or Evaluation Challenge?
Participation: A Performance Goal or Evaluation Challenge? Sean Murphy, National Grid ABSTRACT Reaching customers who have not participated in energy efficiency programs provides an opportunity for program
Risk Management User Guide. Prepared By: Neville Turbit Version Feb /01/2009 Risk Management User Guide Page 1 of 36
Risk Management User Guide Prepared By: Neville Turbit Version 1.0 1 Feb 09 22/01/2009 Risk Management User Guide Page 1 of 36 Table of Contents Document Origin...2 Change History...2 Risk Guidelines...
Books & Trades # 191. March 31, Dr. Alexander Elder The Impulse System Education/ Traders Camp New Software Special.
Books & Trades # 191 March 31, 2012 Dr. Alexander Elder www.elder.com The Impulse System Education/ Traders Camp New Software Special Dear Trader, I ve just returned from the Austrian Alps where I co-taught
How Ontario is Putting Conservation First
How Ontario is Putting Conservation First Nik Schruder Conservation & Corporate Relations, IESO September 2015 Presented at the 2015 ACEEE National Conference on Energy Efficiency as a Resource Overview
Student Guide: RWC Simulation Lab. Free Market Educational Services: RWC Curriculum
Free Market Educational Services: RWC Curriculum Student Guide: RWC Simulation Lab Table of Contents Getting Started... 4 Preferred Browsers... 4 Register for an Account:... 4 Course Key:... 4 The Student
Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No.
Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No. 62547-E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No. 57088-E APPLICABILITY Schedule CCA-INFO Sheet 1 Applicable to Community
Backgrounder October 2007
Backgrounder October 2007 Guaranty Associations Approach to Unearned Premium Claims Puts Payment on the Fast Track for Homeowners, Auto Policyholders By Nick Crews National Conference of Insurance Guaranty
THE ELECTRIC HONEYPOT: THE PROFITABILITY OF DEREGULATED ELECTRIC GENERATION COMPANIES By Edward Bodmer
THE ELECTRIC HONEYPOT: THE PROFITABILITY OF DEREGULATED ELECTRIC GENERATION COMPANIES By Edward Bodmer EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Purpose and Conclusions of the Study This report presents the results of an investigative
ECE 333 Green Electric Energy
ECE 333 2002 2017 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 1 ECE 333 Green Electric Energy Recitation: Economics Applications George Gross Department of Electrical
As the size of the GorillaTrades portfolio increases, the Gorilla understands that not every new stock idea can be purchased.
Welcome to the GorillaTrades System tutorial. Feel free to learn at your own pace. You can pause anytime, and can also select different chapters. If you d prefer to read through the material yourself,
Matthew F. Hilzinger Chief Financial Officer
Matthew F. Hilzinger Chief Financial Officer Morgan Stanley Global Electricity & Energy Conference April 3, 2008 Forward-Looking Statements This presentation includes forward-looking statements within
Thomson Reuters Legal Tracker LDO Index BENCHMARKING & TRENDS REPORT
Thomson Reuters Legal Tracker LDO Index BENCHMARKING & TRENDS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: KEY FINDINGS In this inaugural edition of the Thomson Reuters Legal Tracker LDO Index, we begin a series of semiannual
STATEWIDE EVALUATION TEAM PRELIMINARY ANNUAL REPORT TO THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION
STATEWIDE EVALUATION TEAM PRELIMINARY ANNUAL REPORT TO THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION Year 5 June 1, 2013 through May 31, 2014 Pennsylvania Act 129 of 2008 Energy Efficiency and Conservation
Grow your business 2016 Issue 07
2016 ISSUE 07 CONTENTS Have you considered a wealth analysis? The decision to lease vs. buy is still important today. Managing time is essential for small business success. Have you considered a wealth
PENSION SYSTEM RESUMPTION (PSR) RECOVERY PLAN PROJECT
NASCIO AWARD NOMINATION FOR DIGITAL GOVERNMENT: GOVERNMENT TO BUSINESS (G TO B) PENSION SYSTEM RESUMPTION (PSR) RECOVERY PLAN PROJECT CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM INITIATED MARCH 2010
IMPACT AND PROCESS EVALUATION OF AMEREN ILLINOIS COMPANY BEHAVIORAL MODIFICATION PROGRAM (PY5) FINAL OPINION DYNAMICS. Prepared for: Prepared by:
IMPACT AND PROCESS EVALUATION OF AMEREN ILLINOIS COMPANY S BEHAVIORAL MODIFICATION PROGRAM (PY5) FINAL Prepared for: AMEREN ILLINOIS COMPANY Prepared by: OPINION DYNAMICS 1999 Harrison Street Suite 1420
A Fast Track to Structured Finance Modeling, Monitoring, and Valuation: Jump Start VBA By William Preinitz Copyright 2009 by William Preinitz
A Fast Track to Structured Finance Modeling, Monitoring, and Valuation: Jump Start VBA By William Preinitz Copyright 2009 by William Preinitz APPENDIX A Mortgage Math OVERVIEW I have included this section
ARMCHAIR INVESTOR (sm) MORNING MARKET NEWSLETTER
01/23/2019 UPTREND day 13 Market FLAT, holding above 50-day m.a. line. Wednesday Volume 18 #15 To open the FULL ARMCHAIR INVESTOR NEWSLETTER, click here Then click on CURRENT NEWSLETTER. Fell modes CURRENT
Northern Trust Investments is proud to sponsor this podcast Investing in a World of
INVESTING IN A WORLD OF BUBBLES Northern Trust Investments is proud to sponsor this podcast Investing in a World of Bubbles. This podcast will be of particular interest to advisors looking to help temper
SUBSTANTIVE RULES APPLICABLE TO ELECTRIC SERVICE PROVIDERS. ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CUSTOMER-OWNED RESOURCES.
25.181. Energy Efficiency Goal. (a) (b) (c) Purpose. The purposes of this section are to ensure that: (1) electric utilities administer energy savings incentive programs in a market-neutral, nondiscriminatory
Quarterly Report to the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Quarterly Report to the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission For the Period September 1, 2012 through November 30, 2012 Program Year 4, Quarter 2 For Pennsylvania Act 129 of 2008 Energy Efficiency and
Exhibit DAS-1. Tucson Electric Power Company Demand-Side Management Program Portfolio Plan
Exhibit DAS-1 Tucson Electric Power Company Demand-Side Management Program Portfolio Plan 2008-2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction...3 2. DSM Portfolio Performance Costs, Savings and Net Benefits...3
2017 UTILITY RATE STUDY WORK SESSION #2: BACKGROUND, EDUCATIONAL/INFORMATIONAL
2017 UTILITY RATE STUDY WORK SESSION #2: BACKGROUND, EDUCATIONAL/INFORMATIONAL Receive a presentation from Lewis Young Robertson & Burningham regarding the 2017 Utility Rate Study The purpose of the Council
1.1. Version No. Settlements / Rerun. Version Date 02/02/04 Effective Date 01/16/04. Frequently Asked Questions
Table of Contents: Purpose... Page 2 1. File Headers... Page 2 2. File Format... Page 2 3. Dispute Timeline... Page 2 4. Data Delivery Timeline... Page 2 5. Difference Between this Re-run and the FERC
DEFAULT SERVICE IN PENNSYLVANIA. David B. MacGregor, Esquire Anthony D. Kanagy, Esquire Post & Schell, P.C.
DEFAULT SERVICE IN PENNSYLVANIA David B. MacGregor, Esquire Anthony D. Kanagy, Esquire Post & Schell, P.C. Synopsis: This presentation provides an overview of default electric service in Pennsylvania beginning
Subject: Give Me 1 Week and You Could Capture 81% in Citigroup
Subject: Give Me 1 Week and You Could Capture 81% in Citigroup A couple weeks ago, I alerted you to an incredible opportunity to capture BIG profits in Citigroup. At that time, my Quick-Hit Trader subscribers
Spinning Reserve Market Event Report
Spinning Reserve Market Event Report 23 January, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. MARKET EVENT... 1 2. BACKGROUND... 2 3. HYDRO GENERATION, THE HYDRO PPA AND THE AS MARKET... 4 4. CHRONOLOGY AND ANALYSIS...
Trading Execution Risks
Trading Execution Risks Version 2.0 Updated 3 rd March 2017 0 P a g e TRADING EXECUTION RISKS In order to have the best possible trading experience, all traders, regardless of their previous experience,
Request for Proposal For Municipal Aggregated Electricity Supply For Residential and Small Commercial Retail Customers Issued By: The Village of Lisle 925 Burlington Ave Lisle, IL 60532 Issue Date: April
ARMCHAIR INVESTOR (sm) MORNING MARKET NEWSLETTER A TREND-FOLLOWING STRATEGY. CURRENT MARKET DIRECTION: UPTREND under Pressure
12/11/2018 Uptrend under Pressure Market shows additional weakness. Tuesday Volume 17 #238 ARMCHAIR INVESTOR (sm) MORNING MARKET NEWSLETTER A TREND-FOLLOWING STRATEGY To open the FULL ARMCHAIR INVESTOR
How I Trade Forex Using the Slope Direction Line
How I Trade Forex Using the Slope Direction Line by Jeff Glenellis Copyright 2009, Simple4xSystem.net By now, you should already have both the Slope Direction Line (S.D.L.) and the Fibonacci Pivot (FiboPiv)
Cooperative Electric Rates 2013 Power System Engineering, Inc.
Cooperative Electric Rates Ideas for Responding to Current Challenges Facing Electric Cooperatives Jeff Laslie Senior Financial Analyst Power System Engineering Phone: 317.322.5906 Email: lasliej@powersystem.org
Controlling State Spending: A Responsible Alternative to TABOR
Controlling State Spending: A Responsible Alternative to TABOR M. Kevin McGee Department of Economics UW Oshkosh Oshkosh WI 54901 mcgee@uwosh.edu November 2004 Proponents of TABOR the Taxpayer s Bill of
Public Utilities Commission 2012 Report to the Colorado General Assembly on Demand Side Management (DSM) Pursuant to HB ( , C.R.S.
Public Utilities Commission 2012 Report to the Colorado General Assembly on Demand Side Management (DSM) Pursuant to HB 07-1037 ( 40-3.2-105, C.R.S.) Introduction In 2007 the General Assembly passed, and
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * * In the matter, on the Commission s own motion, to implement the provisions of Section 10a(1 of Case No. U-15801 2008
US PROGRAM BUDGET AND FISCAL REPORTING TEMPLATE TEXT
US PROGRAM BUDGET AND FISCAL REPORTING TEMPLATE TEXT Table of Contents Orientation... 2 Glossary... 4 Budget Instructions... 9 Progress and Final Fiscal Reporting Instructions... 14 Rev 12/10 1 of 18 Orientation
2008 Pennsylvania, PA House District 167
2008 Pennsylvania, PA House District 167 Candidates: Carol Palmaccio, Democrat Duane Milne, Republican Questions: Electricity Deregulation Lottery Fund & Home/Community Care Health Care Reform Property
Direct Install (DI) Program. Program Guide. Fiscal Year 2018 (7/1/2017 through 6/30/2018)
Direct Install (DI) Program Program Guide Fiscal Year 2018 (7/1/2017 through 6/30/2018) Table of Contents 1. Overall Program Description... 3 2. Target Market & Eligibility... 3 3. Program Website Link...
Aerocomp, Inc. Table 1 Financial analysis of Project A: Add a twin-jet to the company s fleet Initial Expenditures
Aerocomp, Inc. As she headed toward her boss s office, Emily Hamilton, chief operating officer for the Aerocomp Corporation a computer services firm that specialized in airborne support wished she could
Lesson 3: Failing to Get Medical. Treatment the Right Way
Lesson 3: Failing to Get Medical Treatment the Right Way Rule: The insurance company picks the medical provider. The injured worker can request a change in treatment. When you need a doctor, of course
Flexible Capacity Procurement. Market and Infrastructure Policy Issue Paper
Flexible Capacity Procurement Market and Infrastructure Policy Issue Paper January 27, 2012 Discussion Paper Table of Contents 1 Introduction... 3 2 Background... 4 2.1 ISO Renewable Integration Studies...
Lens Donor Life Cycle Audit Report
Lens Donor Life Cycle Audit Report Sample ICG Client Version: 10 Prepared By: Informed Communications Group www.informedcg.com TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION... 4 1.1 Uses... 4 1.2 Our Audit Process...
Demand-Side Management Annual Status Report Electric and Natural Gas Public Service Company of Colorado
Demand-Side Management Annual Status Report Electric and Natural Gas Public Service Company of Colorado March 31, 2018 / Proceeding No. 16A-0512EG 2017 xcelenergy.com 2018 Xcel Energy Inc. Xcel Energy
David vs Goliath. How small traders can Benefit from the Big Players. coverstory. Gernot Daum
David vs Goliath How small traders can Benefit from the Big Players What does a trader need to complete his trades in a disciplined way? Confidence! And how can he get that? By knowing what he is doing
FastBreak - Year 2012 Review
FastBreak - Year 2012 Review As we enter our 18 th year since the initial release on FastBreak back in 1996, we want to thank all our loyal customers. Before reviewing FastBreak trading system performance
Colorado PUC E-Filings System
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO Proceeding No. 15A 0424E IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF BLACK HILLS/COLORADO ELECTRIC UTILITY COMPANY, LP FOR APPROVAL OF ITS ELECTRIC
Navigating The End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Payment System
Navigating The End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Payment System The Payment Systems Mark A. Meier, MSW, LICSW Page 1 of 10 00:00:00 Mark A. Meier: Let s now shift our focus to talk about the specifics associated
Prepared for the BC Sustainable Energy Association. Expanding Energy Efficiency for BC Hydro: Lessons from Industry Leaders.
Prepared for the BC Sustainable Energy Association Expanding Energy Efficiency for BC Hydro: Lessons from Industry Leaders June 19, 2012 Overview 1. Key Terms and Concepts 2. BC Hydro s IRP 3. US Data
Mind Your Own Business
Mind Your Own Business In the previous two articles we have discussed the importance of defining a Chart of Accounts that reflects how you want to measure and manage your horse business. We also discussed
FY2010. Energy Efficiency Portfolio. Evaluation Summary. Prepared by: The SRP Measurement & Evaluation Department and The Cadmus Group, Inc.
FY2010 Energy Efficiency Portfolio Evaluation Summary Prepared by: The SRP Measurement & Evaluation Department and The Cadmus Group, Inc. August, 2010 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE... 3 SRP s Sustainable Portfolio...
FINAL NOTICE. Santander UK plc FRN: Triton Square, Regent s Place, London NW1 3AN. Date: 19 December ACTION
FINAL NOTICE To: Santander UK plc FRN: 106054 Address: 2 Triton Square, Regent s Place, London NW1 3AN Date: 19 December 2018 1. ACTION 1.1. For the reasons given in this Final Notice, the Financial Conduct