NEWTON PARISH REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT 2008 REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY CAS, Inc MILLER ~ DODSON ASSOCIATES. Community Management by:

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "NEWTON PARISH REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT 2008 REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY CAS, Inc MILLER ~ DODSON ASSOCIATES. Community Management by:"

Transcription

1 REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT 2008 NEWTON PARISH NEWTON PARISH REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2008 Community Management by: CAS, Inc Mr. Dan Quartermane 1930 N. Salem Street, Suite 101 Apex, NC Consultant: MILLER ~ DODSON ASSOCIATES 929 West Street, Suite 310 Annapolis, MD Tel: Fax:

2 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

3 Section A Replacement Reserve Analysis REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT NEWTON PARISH Raleigh, North Carolina Executive Summary - A1 Reserve Status & Funding Plan - A1 General Information - A2 Cash Flow Method - A4 Component Method - A6 Current Association Funding - A8 Reserve Analysis Comments - A9 Section B Replacement Reserve Inventory Replacement Reserve Inventory General information - B1 Replacement Reserve Inventory Comments - B2 Schedule of Projected Replacements and Exclusions - B3 Section C Projected Annual Replacements Projected Annual Replacements General Information - C1 Reserve Analysis and Inventory Policies, Procedures, and Administration - C2 Calendar of Projected Annual Replacements - C2 Scope. Newton Parish is a condominium community located in Raleigh, North Carolina, which was constructed in The community consists of 150 single family and townhouse units. The survey examined the common elements of the property, including: Asphalt drive and parking. Concrete sidewalks and steps. Retaining walls, fencing, and railings. Swimming pool and pool building. Building exteriors. Level of Service. This study has been performed as a Level I, Full Service Reserve Study as defined under the National Reserve Study Standards that have been adopted by the Community Associations Institute. As such, a complete component inventory was established based on information regarding commonly-owned components provided by the community manager and upon quantities derived from field measurement and/or quantity takeoffs from to-scale engineering drawings. The condition of all commonly-owned components was ascertained from a site visit and the visual inspection of each component by the Analyst. The life expectancy and the value of the components are provided based in part on these observations. The fund status and funding plan have been derived from analysis of this data. Section D Condition Assessment Section E Attachments Appendix

4 Purpose. The purpose of this Replacement Reserve Study is to provide Newton Parish (hereinafter called the Association) with an inventory of the common community facilities and infrastructure components that require periodic replacement. The Study includes a general view of the condition of these items and an effective financial plan to fund projected periodic replacements. Inventory of Items Owned by the Association. Section B Replacement Reserve Inventory lists the Projected Replacements of the commonly owned items that require periodic replacement using funding from Replacement Reserves. The Replacement Reserve Inventory also provides information about excluded items, which are items whose replacements are not scheduled for funding from Replacement Reserves. Condition of Items Owned by the Association. Section B Replacement Reserve Inventory includes our estimates of the normal economic life and the remaining economic life for the projected replacements. Section C Calendar of Projected Annual Replacements provides a year-by-year listing of the projected replacements. Section D Condition Assessment provides additional detail for items that are unique or deserving of attention because of their condition or the manner in which they have been treated in this Study. Financial Plan. The Association has a fiduciary responsibility to protect the appearance, value, and safety of the property and it is therefore essential the Association have a financial plan that provides funding for the projected replacements. In conformance with American Institute of Certified Public Accountant guidelines, Section A Replacement Reserve Analysis evaluates the current funding of Replacement Reserves as reported by the Association and recommends annual funding of Replacement Reserves by two generally accepted accounting methods; the Cash Flow Method and the Component Method. Section A Replacement Reserve Analysis includes graphic and tabular presentations of these methods and current Association funding. An Executive Summary of these calculations is provided on Page A1. Basis. The data contained in this Replacement Reserve Study is based upon the following: The Request for Proposal submitted and executed by the Association. Our visual evaluation and measurements on February 6 and 7, Miller - Dodson Associates has visually inspected the common elements of the property in order to ascertain the remaining useful life and the replacement costs of these components. Engineering Drawings. No architectural drawings or engineering site plans were available for review in connection with this study. We recommend the Association assemble a library of site and building plans of the entire community. Reproducible drawings should be stored and kept in a secure fireproof location. The Association will find these drawings to be a valuable resource in planning and executing future projects. Acknowledgement. Miller - Dodson Associates would like to acknowledge the assistance and input of Mr. Dan Quartermane. Mr. Quartermane provided very helpful insight into the current operations at the property. Analyst s Credentials. This study has been performed by James E. Piper, who holds a Bachelors Degree and a Masters Degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Akron and a PhD from the University of Maryland. Mr. Piper is a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of Maryland, and the author of articles and books on the subject of the condition assessment of facilities. He has over 20 years experience in the evaluation and the management of the physical plant of the University of Maryland. He is currently a Reserve Specialist (RS) for Miller-Dodson Associates. Respectfully submitted, MILLER - DODSON ASSOCIATES, INC. James Piper, RS Reserve Specialist

5 Replacement Reserve Analysis - Page A1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Newton Parish Replacement Reserve Inventory identifies 113 Projected Replacements for funding from Replacement Reserves, with an estimated one-time replacement cost of $3,375,021. The Replacement Reserve Analysis calculates recommended funding of Replacement Reserves by the two generally accepted methods, the Cash Flow Method and the Component Method. The Analysis also evaluates current funding of Replacement Reserves, as reported by the Association. The calculations and evaluation are summarized below: $157,496 CASH FLOW METHOD MINIMUM ANNUAL FUNDING OF REPLACEMENT RESERVES IN THE STUDY YEAR, $87.50 Per unit (average), minimum monthly funding of Replacement Reserves The Cash Flow Method (CFM) calculates Minimum Annual Funding of Replacement Reserves that will fund Projected Replacements identified in the Replacement Reserve Inventory from a common pool of Replacement Reserves and prevent Replacement Reserves from dropping below a Minimum Recommended Balance. CFM - Minimum Annual Funding remains the same between peaks in cumulative expenditures called Peak Years. The first Peak Year occurs in 2028 and the CFM - Minimum Annual Funding of Replacement Reserves in 2029 declines to $81,447 ($45.25 per unit, per month), after the completion of $3,326,174 of replacements in 2008 to After 2028 the CFM - Minimum Annual Funding remains constant for the remainder of the Study Period. $387,983 COMPONENT METHOD RECOMMENDED ANNUAL FUNDING OF REPLACEMENT RESERVES IN THE STUDY YEAR, $ Per unit (average), recommended monthly funding of Replacement Reserves The Component Method is a time tested and very conservative funding model developed by HUD in the early 1980's. The Component Method treats each projected replacement in the Replacement Reserve Inventory as a separate account. Deposits are made to each individual account, where funds are held for exclusive use by that item. Based on this funding model, the Association has a Current Funding Objective of $1,752,225. The Association reports having $120,000 on deposit, which is 6.8% funded. $46,675 CURRENT ANNUAL FUNDING OF REPLACEMENT RESERVES (as reported by the Association). $25.93 Per unit (average), reported current monthly funding of Replacement Reserves The evaluation of Current Funding, as reported by the Association, has calculated that if the Association continues to fund Replacement Reserves at the current level, there will NOT be adequate funds for Projected Replacements in 27 years of the 30-year Study Period, and a maximum shortfall of $-2,304,822 occurs in Pages A2 and A3 explain the Study Year, Study Period, Adjustments (interest & inflation), Beginning Balance, and Projected Replacements. Pages A4 to A9 explain in more detail the calculations associated with the Cash Flow Method, Component Method, and Current Funding. REPLACEMENT RESERVE STATUS AND FUNDING PLAN Current funding of Replacement Reserves is inadequate to fund Projected Replacements. We recommend the Association adopt a Replacement Reserve Funding Plan based on the Cash Flow Method or the Component Method, to ensure that adequate funding is available throughout the 30-Year Study Period for the $3,800,484 of Projected Replacements listed in the Newton Parish Replacement Reserve Inventory. The Funding Plan should be professionally evaluated every three to five years or after completion of each major replacement project. The Board of Directors has a fiduciary responsibility to review the Funding Plan annually and should consider annual increases in Replacement Reserve funding at least equal to the Consumer Price Index.

6 Replacement Reserve Analysis - Page A2 REPLACEMENT RESERVE ANALYSIS - GENERAL INFORMATION The Newton Parish Replacement Reserve Analysis calculations of recommended funding of Replacement Reserves by the Cash Flow Method and the Component Method, and the evaluation of the Current Funding, are based upon the same General Information; including the Study Year, Study Period, Adjustments (for interest, inflation, and/or a constant increase in annual funding), Beginning Balance, and Projected Replacements: STUDY YEAR The Association reports that their accounting year begins on January 1, and the Study Year, the first year evaluated by the Replacement Reserve Analysis, begins on January 1, STUDY PERIOD The Replacement Reserve Analysis evaluates the funding of Replacement Reserves over a 30-year Study Period that begins on January 1, ADJUSTMENTS The calculations in this Replacement Reserve Analysis do not account for interest earned on Replacement Reserves, the effects of inflation on the costs of Projected Replacements, or a constant annual increase in Annual Funding of Replacement Reserves. If requested, we will provide a Replacement Reserve Analysis with adjustments for inflation, interest, and/or a constant annual increase in funding, using values provided by the Association. BEGINNING BALANCE The Association reports Replacement Reserves on Deposit totaling $120,000 at the start of the Study Year. Graph #1. Annual Expenditures for Projected Replacements This bar graph summarizes annual expenditures for the $3,800,484 of Projected Replacements identified in the Replacement Reserve Inventory over the 30-year Study Period. The red line shows the average annual expenditure of $126,683. $500,000 $400,000 $386,580 $386,936 $126, YR AVERAGE $82,617 $15,042 $169,964 $12,614 $198,292 $139,641 $336,793 $211,353 $347,728 $44,337 $351,096 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $180,287 $65,580 $21,301 $188,655 $10,391 $151,934 $12,628 $12,406 $76,542 $7,324 $35,120 $51,123 $142,089 $26,802 $51,549 $11,206 $72,556 $

7 Replacement Reserve Analysis - Page A3 PROJECTED REPLACEMENTS The Newton Parish Replacement Reserve Inventory (Section B) identifies 113 Projected Replacements with a one-time Replacement Cost of $3,375,021 and replacements totaling $3,800,484 over the 30-year Study Period. Projected Replacements are the replacement of commonly-owned items that: require periodic replacement and whose replacement is to be funded from Replacement Reserves. The Replacement Reserve Inventory also identifies 36 Excluded Items. Expenditures for the replacement of these items are NOT scheduled for funding from Replacement Reserves. The accuracy of the calculations made in the Replacement Reserve Analysis is dependent on expenditures NOT being made for Excluded Items. The rationale behind these exclusions is discussed in detail on Page B1. Expenditures from Replacements Reserves should be made only after consultation with an accounting professional. The Section B - Replacement Reserve Inventory, contains Tables that list each Projected Replacement (and any Excluded Items) broken down into 17 major categories (Pages B3 to B18). Tables are also included that list each Projected Replacement by year for each of the 30 years of the Study Period beginning on Page C1. The accuracy of this Replacement Reserve Analysis is dependent upon expenditures from Replacement Reserves being made only for the Projected Replacements specifically listed in the Replacement Reserve Inventory. Graph #2. Comparison of Cumulative Replacement Reserve Funding and Expenditures The line graph shows Replacement Reserves - Cumulative Receipts over the 30-year Study Period by the Cash Flow Method (red circles), Component Method (purple diamonds), and the Current Funding Plan as reported by the Association (blue triangles). The bar graph shows the Cumulative Expenditures necessary to fund the Project Replacements listed in the Replacement Reserve Inventory (Section B) and summarized in Graph #1. $6,000,000 Cash Flow Method - Cumulative Receipts Component Method - Cumulative Receipts Current Funding - Cumulative Receipts Projected Replacements - Cumulative Expenditures $5,480,097 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,800,484 $4,160,446 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,520,250 $1,000,000 $

8 Replacement Reserve Analysis - Page A4 CASH FLOW METHOD $157,496 CASH FLOW METHOD MINIMUM ANNUAL FUNDING OF REPLACEMENT RESERVES IN THE STUDY YEAR, $87.50 Per unit (average), minimum monthly funding of Replacement Reserves General. The Cash Flow Method is founded on the concept that the Replacement Reserve Account is solvent if cumulative receipts always exceed cumulative expenses. The Cash Flow Method calculates a MINIMUM annual deposit to Replacement Reserves that will: Fund all Projected Replacements listed in the Replacement Reserve Inventory (see Section B) Prevent Replacement Reserves from dropping below the Minimum Recommended Balance Allow a constant annual funding level between peaks in cumulative expenditures Graph #3. Cash Flow Method - Cumulative Receipts and Expenditures Graph $5,000,000 Cash Flow Method - Cumulative Receipts Cash Flow Method - Year End Balance Cumulative Expenditures $4,000,000 $3,800,484 $4,160,446 First Peak Year $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $359,961 $

9 Replacement Reserve Analysis - Page A5 CASH FLOW METHOD (cont'd) Replacement Reserves - Minimum Recommended Balance. The Minimum Recommended Balance is $101,251, which is 3.0 percent of the one-time replacement cost of the Projected Replacements listed in the Replacement Reserve Inventory. Unless otherwise noted in the Comments on Page A-9, the Minimum Recommended Balance has been established by the Analyst based upon an evaluation of the types of items included in the Replacement Reserve Inventory. Peak Years. The Cash Flow Method calculates a constant annual funding of Replacement Reserves between peaks in cumulative expenditures called Peak Years. In Peak Years, Replacement Reserves on Deposit decline to the Replacement Reserves - Minimum Recommended Balance discussed in the paragraph above. First Peak Year. The First Peak Year occurs in 2028, after the completion of $3,326,174 of replacements in 2008 to The Cash Flow Method - Minimum Annual Funding of Replacement Reserves declines from $157,496 in 2028 to $81,447 in Subsequent Peak Years. There are no subsequent Peak Years and after the first Peak Year in 2028, the Cash Flow Method - Minimum Annual Funding remains constant for the remainder of the Study Period. Study Period. The Cash Flow Method calculates the recommended contributions to Replacement Reserves over the 30-year Study Period. These calculations are based upon a 40-year projection of expenditures for Projected Replacements to avoid the Replacement Reserve balance dropping to the Minimum Recommended Balance in the final year of the Study Period. Failure to Fund. The Cash Flow Method calculates a MINIMUM annual funding of Replacement Reserves. Failure to fund Replacement Reserves at the minimum level calculated by the Cash Flow Method will result in Replacement Reserves not being available for the Projected Replacements listed in the Replacement Reserve Inventory and/or Replacement Reserves dropping below the Minimum Recommended Balance. Adjustment to the Cash Flow Method for interest and inflation. The calculations in this Replacement Reserve Analysis do not account for interest earned on Replacement Reserves, the effects of inflation of the cost of Projected Replacements, or a constant annual increase in Annual Funding of Replacement Reserves. Comparison of Cash Flow Funding and Average Annual Expenditure. The Average Annual Expenditure for Projected Replacements listed in the Reserve Inventory over the 30-year Study Period is $126,683 (see Graph #1). The Cash Flow Method - Minimum Annual Funding of Replacement Reserves in the Study Year is $157,496. This is percent of the Average Annual Expenditure, indicating that the Association is building Replacement Reserves in advance of the first Peak Year in Table #1. Cash Flow Method Data - Years 1 through 30 Year Starting balance $120,000 Annual deposit $157,496 $157,496 $157,496 $157,496 $157,496 $157,496 $157,496 $157,496 $157,496 $157,496 Expenditures $82,617 $15,042 $169,964 $12,614 $198,292 $139,641 $211,353 $44,337 $180,287 $65,580 Year end balance $194,879 $337,333 $324,865 $469,747 $428,952 $446,807 $392,951 $506,111 $483,320 $575,237 Minimum rec. funding lvl. $101,251 $101,251 $101,251 $101,251 $101,251 $101,251 $101,251 $101,251 $101,251 $101,251 Cumulative expenditures $82,617 $97,659 $267,624 $280,238 $478,530 $618,171 $829,524 $873,861 $1,054,147 $1,119,727 Cumulative receipts $277,496 $434,993 $592,489 $749,986 $907,482 $1,064,978 $1,222,475 $1,379,971 $1,537,468 $1,694,964 Year Annual deposit $157,496 $157,496 $157,496 $157,496 $157,496 $157,496 $157,496 $157,496 $157,496 $157,496 Expenditures $386,580 $21,301 $188,655 $10,391 $336,793 $151,934 $347,728 $12,628 $351,096 $12,406 Year end balance $346,153 $482,348 $451,190 $598,296 $419,000 $424,562 $234,330 $379,199 $185,599 $330,690 Minimum rec. funding lvl. $101,251 $101,251 $101,251 $101,251 $101,251 $101,251 $101,251 $101,251 $101,251 $101,251 Cumulative expenditures $1,506,308 $1,527,608 $1,716,263 $1,726,654 $2,063,446 $2,215,381 $2,563,109 $2,575,737 $2,926,832 $2,939,238 Cumulative receipts $1,852,460 $2,009,957 $2,167,453 $2,324,950 $2,482,446 $2,639,943 $2,797,439 $2,954,935 $3,112,432 $3,269,928 Year Annual deposit $157,496 $81,447 $81,447 $81,447 $81,447 $81,447 $81,447 $81,447 $81,447 $81,447 Expenditures $386,936 $76,542 $7,324 $35,120 $51,123 $142,089 $26,802 $51,549 $11,206 $72,556 Year end balance $101,251 $106,155 $180,278 $226,604 $256,928 $196,286 $250,931 $280,830 $351,070 $359,961 Minimum rec. funding lvl. $101,251 $101,251 $101,251 $101,251 $101,251 $101,251 $101,251 $101,251 $101,251 $101,251 Cumulative expenditures $3,326,174 $3,402,716 $3,410,040 $3,445,161 $3,496,283 $3,638,372 $3,665,174 $3,716,722 $3,727,929 $3,800,484 Cumulative receipts $3,427,425 $3,508,871 $3,590,318 $3,671,765 $3,753,212 $3,834,658 $3,916,105 $3,997,552 $4,078,999 $4,160,446 First Peak Year

10 Replacement Reserve Analysis - Page A6 COMPONENT METHOD $387,983 COMPONENT METHOD RECOMMENDED ANNUAL FUNDING OF REPLACEMENT RESERVES IN THE STUDY YEAR, $ Per unit (average), recommended monthly funding of Replacement Reserves General. The Component Method is a time tested and very conservative mathematical model developed by HUD in the early 1980s. Each of the 113 Projected Replacements listed in the Replacement Reserve Inventory is treated as a separate account. The Beginning Balance is allocated to each of these individual accounts, as is all subsequent funding of Replacement Reserves. These funds are "locked" in these individual accounts and are not available to fund other Projected Replacements. The calculation of the Recommended Annual Funding of Replacement Reserves is a multi-step process outlined in more detail on Page A7. Graph #4. Component Method - Cumulative Receipts and Expenditures Graph $6,000,000 Component Method - Cumulative Receipts Component Method - Year End Balance Projected Replacements - Cumulative Expenditures $5,480,097 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,800,484 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,679,613 $1,000,000 $

11 Replacement Reserve Analysis - Page A7 COMPONENT METHOD (cont'd) Current Funding Objective. A Current Funding Objective is calculated for each of the Projected Replacements listed in the Replacement Reserve Inventory. Replacement Cost is divided by the Normal Economic Life to determine the nominal annual contribution. The Remaining Economic Life is then subtracted from the Normal Economic Life to calculate the number of years that the nominal annual contribution should have been made. The two values are then multiplied to determine the Current Funding Objective. This is repeated for each of the 113 Projected Replacements. The total, $1,752,225, is the Current Funding Objective. For an example, consider a very simple Replacement Reserve Inventory with one Projected Replacement, a fence with a $1,000 Replacement Cost, a Normal Economic Life of 10 years, and a Remaining Economic Life of 2 years. A contribution to Replacement Reserves of $100 ($1, years) should have been made in each of the previous 8 years (10 years - 2 years). The result is a Current Funding Objective of $800 (8 years x $100 per year). Funding Percentage. The Funding Percentage is calculated by dividing the Beginning Balance ($120,000) by the Current Funding Objective ($1,752,225). At Newton Parish the Funding Percentage is 6.8% Allocation of the Beginning Balance. The Beginning Balance is divided among the 113 Projected Replacements in the Replacement Reserve Inventory. The Current Funding Objective for each Projected Replacement is multiplied by the Funding Percentage and these funds are then "locked" into the account of each item. If we relate this calculation back to our fence example, it means that the Association has not accumulated $800 in Reserves (the Funding Objective), but rather at 6.8 percent funded, there is $55 in the account for the fence. Annual Funding. The Recommended Annual Funding of Replacement Reserves is then calculated for each Projected Replacement. The funds allocated to the account of the Projected Replacement are subtracted from the Replacement Cost. The result is then divided by the number of years until replacement, and the result is the annual funding for each of the Projected Replacements. The sum of these is $387,983, the Component Method Recommended Annual Funding of Replacement Reserves in the Study Year (2008). In our fence example, the $55 in the account is subtracted from the $1,000 Total Replacement Cost and divided by the 2 years that remain before replacement, resulting in an annual deposit of $473. Next year, the deposit remains $473, but in the third year, the fence is replaced and the annual funding adjusts to $100. Adjustment to the Component Method for interest and inflation. The calculations in the Replacement Reserve Analysis do not account for interest earned on Replacement Reserves, the effects of inflation of the cost of Projected Replacements, or a constant annual increase in Annual Funding of Replacement Reserves. Table #2. Component Method Data - Years 1 through 30 Year Starting balance $120,000 Annual deposit $387,983 $319,735 $314,459 $266,524 $264,430 $233,951 $221,800 $199,787 $197,132 $183,511 Expenditures $82,617 $15,042 $169,964 $12,614 $198,292 $139,641 $211,353 $44,337 $180,287 $65,580 Year end balance $425,366 $730,059 $874,553 $1,128,463 $1,194,601 $1,288,911 $1,299,358 $1,454,808 $1,471,654 $1,589,585 Cumulative Expenditures $82,617 $97,659 $267,624 $280,238 $478,530 $618,171 $829,524 $873,861 $1,054,147 $1,119,727 Cumulative Receipts $507,983 $827,718 $1,142,177 $1,408,701 $1,673,131 $1,907,082 $2,128,882 $2,328,669 $2,525,801 $2,709,312 Year Annual deposit $180,725 $162,520 $162,011 $153,280 $153,123 $144,343 $143,025 $136,493 $136,493 $131,540 Expenditures $386,580 $21,301 $188,655 $10,391 $336,793 $151,934 $347,728 $12,628 $351,096 $12,406 Year end balance $1,383,730 $1,524,948 $1,498,305 $1,641,194 $1,457,525 $1,449,933 $1,245,230 $1,369,095 $1,154,493 $1,273,626 Cumulative Expenditures $1,506,308 $1,527,608 $1,716,263 $1,726,654 $2,063,446 $2,215,381 $2,563,109 $2,575,737 $2,926,832 $2,939,238 Cumulative Receipts $2,890,037 $3,052,557 $3,214,568 $3,367,848 $3,520,972 $3,665,314 $3,808,339 $3,944,832 $4,081,325 $4,212,865 Year Annual deposit $131,540 $127,838 $126,398 $126,398 $126,369 $126,090 $125,665 $125,665 $125,634 $125,634 Expenditures $386,936 $76,542 $7,324 $35,120 $51,123 $142,089 $26,802 $51,549 $11,206 $72,556 Year end balance $1,018,231 $1,069,526 $1,188,601 $1,279,878 $1,355,125 $1,339,126 $1,437,989 $1,512,106 $1,626,534 $1,679,613 Cumulative Expenditures $3,326,174 $3,402,716 $3,410,040 $3,445,161 $3,496,283 $3,638,372 $3,665,174 $3,716,722 $3,727,929 $3,800,484 Cumulative Receipts $4,344,405 $4,472,243 $4,598,641 $4,725,039 $4,851,408 $4,977,498 $5,103,163 $5,228,828 $5,354,463 $5,480,097

12 Replacement Reserve Analysis - Page A8 CURRENT FUNDING $46,675 CURRENT ANNUAL FUNDING OF REPLACEMENT RESERVES (as reported by the Association). $25.93 Per unit (average), reported current monthly funding of Replacement Reserves General. Our evaluation of the Current Association Funding assumes that the Association will continue to fund Replacement Reserves at the current level of $46,675 per year in each of the 30 years of the Study Period. Our evaluation is based upon this Replacement Reserve Funding Level, a $120,000 Beginning Balance, the Projected Annual Replacement Expenditures shown in Graph #1 and listed in the Replacement Reserve Inventory, and any interest, inflation rate, or constant annual increase in annual contribution adjustments discussed below. Evaluation. Our calculations have determined that Current Annual Funding of Replacement Reserves, as reported by the Association, is inadequate to fund Projected Replacement beginning in The Current Annual Funding of Replacement Reserves results in insufficient funds to make Projected Replacements in 27 years of the 30-year Study Period, and a maximum shortfall of $-2,304,822 occurs in Adjustment to the Current Association Funding for interest and inflation. The Calculations in the Replacement Reserve Analysis do not account for interest earned on Replacement Reserves, the effects of inflation of the cost of Projected Replacements, or a constant annual increase in Annual Funding of Replacement Reserves. Comparison of Current Association Funding and Average Annual Expenditure. The average annual expenditure for Projected Replacements listed in the Reserve Inventory over the 30-year Study Period is $126,683 (see Graph #1). Current Association annual funding of Replacement Reserves is $46,675, or approximately 37 percent of the Average Annual Expenditure. Graph #5. Current Association Funding - Cumulative Receipts and Expenditures Graph $5,000,000 Current Funding - Cumulative Receipts Current Funding - Year End Balance Projected Replacements - Cumulative Expenditures $4,000,000 $3,800,484 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,520,250 $1,000,000 $0 ($1,000,000) ($2,000,000) ($2,280,234) ($3,000,000)

13 Replacement Reserve Analysis - Page A9 CURRENT FUNDING (cont'd) Table #3. Current Funding Data - Years 1 through 30 Year Starting balance $120,000 Annual deposit $46,675 $46,675 $46,675 $46,675 $46,675 $46,675 $46,675 $46,675 $46,675 $46,675 Expenditures $82,617 $15,042 $169,964 $12,614 $198,292 $139,641 $211,353 $44,337 $180,287 $65,580 Year end balance $84,058 $115,691 ($7,599) $26,462 ($125,155) ($218,121) ($382,799) ($380,461) ($514,072) ($532,977) Cumulative Expenditures $82,617 $97,659 $267,624 $280,238 $478,530 $618,171 $829,524 $873,861 $1,054,147 $1,119,727 Cumulative Receipts $166,675 $213,350 $260,025 $306,700 $353,375 $400,050 $446,725 $493,400 $540,075 $586,750 Year Annual deposit $46,675 $46,675 $46,675 $46,675 $46,675 $46,675 $46,675 $46,675 $46,675 $46,675 Expenditures $386,580 $21,301 $188,655 $10,391 $336,793 $151,934 $347,728 $12,628 $351,096 $12,406 Year end balance ($872,883) ($847,508) ($989,488) ($953,204) ($1,243,321) ($1,348,581) ($1,649,634) ($1,615,587) ($1,920,007) ($1,885,738) Cumulative expenditures $1,506,308 $1,527,608 $1,716,263 $1,726,654 $2,063,446 $2,215,381 $2,563,109 $2,575,737 $2,926,832 $2,939,238 Cumulative receipts $633,425 $680,100 $726,775 $773,450 $820,125 $866,800 $913,475 $960,150 $1,006,825 $1,053,500 Year Annual deposit $46,675 $46,675 $46,675 $46,675 $46,675 $46,675 $46,675 $46,675 $46,675 $46,675 Expenditures $386,936 $76,542 $7,324 $35,120 $51,123 $142,089 $26,802 $51,549 $11,206 $72,556 Year end balance ($2,225,999) ($2,255,866) ($2,216,515) ($2,204,961) ($2,209,408) ($2,304,822) ($2,284,949) ($2,289,822) ($2,254,354) ($2,280,234) Cumulative Expenditures $3,326,174 $3,402,716 $3,410,040 $3,445,161 $3,496,283 $3,638,372 $3,665,174 $3,716,722 $3,727,929 $3,800,484 Cumulative Receipts $1,100,175 $1,146,850 $1,193,525 $1,240,200 $1,286,875 $1,333,550 $1,380,225 $1,426,900 $1,473,575 $1,520,250 COMMENTS ON THE REPLACEMENT RESERVE ANALYSIS This Replacement Reserve Study has been developed in compliance with the Community Associations Institute, National Reserve Study Standards, for a Level One Study - Full Service. Newton Parish has 150 units. The type of property is HOA. Our calculations assume that Replacement Reserves are not subject to tax.

14 Intentionally Left Blank

15 Replacement Reserve Inventory - Page B1 REPLACEMENT RESERVE INVENTORY GENERAL INFORMATION Newton Parish - Replacement Reserve Inventory identifies 149 items. Two types of items are identified, Projected Replacements and Excluded Items: PROJECTED REPLACEMENTS. 113 of the items are Projected Replacements and the periodic replacements of these items are scheduled for funding from Replacement Reserves. The Projected Replacements have an estimated one-time replacement cost of $3,375,021. Replacements totaling $3,800,484 are scheduled in the Replacement Reserve Inventory over the 30-year Study Period. Projected Replacements are the replacement of commonly owned physical assets that require periodic replacement and whose replacement is to be funded from Replacement Reserves. EXCLUDED ITEMS. 36 of the items are Excluded Items, and expenditures for these items are NOT scheduled for funding from Replacement Reserves. The accuracy of the calculations made in the Replacement Reserve Analysis is dependent on expenditures NOT being made for Excluded Items. The Excluded Items are listed in the Replacement Reserve Inventory to identify specific items and categories of items that are not to be funded from Replacement Reserves. There are multiple categories of items that are typically excluded from funding by Replacement Reserves, including but not limited to: Tax Code. The United States Tax Code grants very favorable tax status to Replacement Reserves, conditioned on expenditures being made within certain guidelines. These guidelines typically exclude maintenance activities, partial replacements, repairs, capital improvements, and one-time only replacements. Value. Items with a replacement cost of less that $1,000 are typically excluded from funding from Replacement Reserves. This exclusion is made to accurately reflect how Replacement Reserves are administered. If the Association has selected an alternative level, it will be noted in the Replacement Reserve Inventory - General Comments on Page B2. Long-lived Items. Items that when properly maintained, can be assumed to have a life equal to the property as a whole, are typically excluded from the Replacement Reserve Inventory. Unit improvements. Items located on property owned by a single unit and where the items serve a single unit are generally assumed to be the responsibility of that unit, not the Association. Other non-common improvements. Items owned by the local government, public and private utility companies, the United States Postal Service, Master Associations, state and local highway authorities, etc., may be installed on property that is owned by the Association. These types of items are generally not the responsibility of the Association and are excluded from the Replacement Reserve Inventory. The rationale for the exclusion of an item from funding by Replacement Reserves is discussed in more detail in the 'Comments' section of it's page of the Replacement Reserve Inventory. CATEGORIES. The 149 items included in the Newton Parish Replacement Reserve Inventory are divided into 17 major categories. Each category is printed on a separate page, Pages B3 to B18. LEVEL OF SERVICE. This Replacement Reserve Inventory has been developed in compliance with the standards established for a Level One Study - Full Service, as defined by the National Reserve Study Standards, established in 1998 by Community Associations Institute, which states: A Level I - Full Service Reserve Study includes the computation of complete component inventory information regarding commonly owned components provided by the property manager, quantities derived from field measurements and/or quantity takeoffs from to-scale engineering drawings that may be made available. The condition of all components is ascertained from a visual inspection of each component by the analyst. The life expectancy and the value of the components are provided based on these observations and the funding status and funding plan are then derived from analysis of this data.

16 Replacement Reserve Inventory - Page B2 REPLACEMENT RESERVE INVENTORY - GENERAL INFORMATION (cont'd) INVENTORY DATA. Each of the 113 Projected Replacements listed in the Replacement Reserve Inventory includes the following data: Item Number. The Item Number is assigned sequentially and is intended for identification purposes only. Item Description. We have named each item included in the Inventory. Where the name of the item and the category are not sufficient to specifically identify the item, we have included additional information in the Comments section at the bottom of the page. Units. We have used standard abbreviations to identify the number of units including SF-square feet, FT-feet, SY-square yard, LS-lump sum, EA-each, and PR-pair. Nonstandard abbreviations are noted in the Comments section on the page on which the abbreviation is used. Number of Units. The methods used to develop the quantities are discussed in "Level of Service" above. Unit Replacement Cost. We use two sources to develop the unit cost data shown in the Inventory; industry standard estimating manuals published by R. S. Means Company, Inc., and data that we have developed based upon our experience with similar replacement projects. We frequently use our best professional judgment to modify these values to reflect conditions at the site that we believe will affect the unit costs. Actual Replacement Costs may vary substantially from our estimates because of unforeseen demolition costs, engineering and architectural fees, timing of the replacement, etc. Normal Economic Life (Yrs). The number of years that a new and properly installed item should be expected to remain in service. Economic Life Remaining (Yrs). The estimated number of years before an item will need to be replaced. In "normal" conditions, this could be calculated by subtracting the age of the item from the Normal Economic Life of the item, but only rarely do physical assets age "normally". Some items may have longer or shorter lives depending on many factors such as environment, initial quality of the item, maintenance, etc. Total Replacement Cost. This is calculated by multiplying the Unit Replacement Cost by the Number of Units. Each of the 36 Excluded Items includes the Item Description, Units, and Number of Units. Many of the Excluded Items are listed as a 'Lump Sum' with a quantity of 1. For the Excluded Items, this indicates that all of the items identified by the 'Item Description' are excluded from funding by Replacement Reserves. REVIEW OF EXPENDITURES. All expenditures from Replacement Reserves should be made only after consultation with an accounting professional. PARTIAL FUNDING. Items may have been included in the Replacement Reserve Inventory at less than 100 percent of their full quantity and/or replacement cost. This is done on items that will never be replaced in their entirety, but which may require periodic replacements over an extended period of time. The assumptions that provide the basis for any partial funding are noted on in the Comments section.

17 Replacement Reserve Inventory - Page B3 CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND STEPS PROJECTED REPLACEMENTS UNIT NORMAL REMAINING ITEM ITEM NUMBER REPLACEMENT ECONOMIC ECONOMIC REPLACEMENT # DESCRIPTION UNIT OF UNITS COST ($) LIFE (YRS) LIFE (YRS) COST ($) 1 Concrete flatwork (6%) sf 1,397 $ $10,478 2 Concrete flatwork (6%) sf 1,397 $ $10,478 3 Concrete flatwork (6%) sf 1,397 $ $10,478 4 Concrete flatwork (6%) sf 1,397 $ $10,478 5 Concrete flatwork (6%) sf 1,397 $ $10,478 6 Concrete flatwork (6%) sf 1,397 $ $10,478 7 Concrete flatwork (6%) sf 1,397 $ $10,478 8 Concrete flatwork (6%) sf 1,397 $ $10,478 9 Concrete flatwork (6%) sf 1,397 $ $10, Concrete flatwork (6%) sf 1,397 $ $10, Concrete steps (6%) lf 19 $ $1, Concrete steps (6%) lf 19 $ $1, Concrete steps (6%) lf 19 $ $1, Concrete steps (6%) lf 19 $ $1, Concrete steps (6%) lf 19 $ $1, Concrete steps (6%) lf 19 $ $1, Concrete steps (6%) lf 19 $ $1, Concrete steps (6%) lf 19 $ $1, Concrete steps (6%) lf 19 $ $1, Concrete steps (6%) lf 19 $ $1,728 CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND STEPS - Replacement Costs - Subtotal $122,058 CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND STEPS COMMENTS

18 Replacement Reserve Inventory - Page B4 BRICK STEPS PROJECTED REPLACEMENTS UNIT NORMAL REMAINING ITEM ITEM NUMBER REPLACEMENT ECONOMIC ECONOMIC REPLACEMENT # DESCRIPTION UNIT OF UNITS COST ($) LIFE (YRS) LIFE (YRS) COST ($) 21 Brick steps (6%) lf 565 $ $33, Brick steps (6%) lf 565 $ $33, Brick steps (6%) lf 565 $ $33, Brick steps (6%) lf 565 $ $33, Brick steps (6%) lf 565 $ $33, Brick steps (6%) lf 565 $ $33, Brick steps (6%) lf 565 $ $33, Brick steps (6%) lf 565 $ $33,912 BRICK STEPS - Replacement Costs - Subtotal $271,296 BRICK STEPS COMMENTS

19 Replacement Reserve Inventory - Page B5 ASPHALT PAVEMENT PROJECTED REPLACEMENTS UNIT NORMAL REMAINING ITEM ITEM NUMBER REPLACEMENT ECONOMIC ECONOMIC REPLACEMENT # DESCRIPTION UNIT OF UNITS COST ($) LIFE (YRS) LIFE (YRS) COST ($) 29 Penny Hill Lane asphalt sf 33,222 $ $48, Seal coat Penny Hill Lane sf 33,222 $ none 2 $5, Brynwick Place asphalt sf 6,422 $ $9, Seal coat Brynwick Place sf 6,422 $ $1, Ashbury Court asphalt sf 11,290 $ $16, Seal coat Ashbury Court sf 11,290 $ $1, Sweet Bay Lane asphalt sf 37,900 $ $54, Seal coat Sweet Bay Lane sf 37,900 $ none 2 $6, No name off of Sweet Bay asphalt sf 5,418 $ $7, Seal coat no name sf 5,418 $ $ Galloway Court asphalt sf 15,525 $ $22, Seal coat Galloway Court sf 15,525 $ $2, Bracken Court asphalt sf 25,650 $ $37, Seal coat Bracken Court sf 25,650 $ $4, Weatherburn Lane asphalt sf 39,262 $ $56, Seal coat Weatherburn Lane sf 39,262 $ $6,282 ASPHALT PAVEMENT - Replacement Costs - Subtotal $281,249 ASPHALT PAVEMENT COMMENTS We have assumed that the Association will replace the asphalt pavement by the installation of a 2 inch thick overlay. The pavement will need to be milled prior to the installation of the overlay. Milling and the cost of minor repairs (5 to 10 percent of the total area) to the base materials and bearing soils beneath the pavement is included in the cost shown above.

20 Replacement Reserve Inventory - Page B6 SITE FACILITIES PROJECTED REPLACEMENTS UNIT NORMAL REMAINING ITEM ITEM NUMBER REPLACEMENT ECONOMIC ECONOMIC REPLACEMENT # DESCRIPTION UNIT OF UNITS COST ($) LIFE (YRS) LIFE (YRS) COST ($) 45 Wythe Circle asphalt sf 18,822 $ $27, Seal coat Wythe Circle sf 18,822 $ none 2 $3, Storage shed roof sf 187 $ $ Storage shed siding sf 416 $ $1, Community sign ea 2 $1, $2, Mailbox clusters ea 13 $1, $23, Wood retaining wall sf 261 $ $8,352 SITE FACILITIES - Replacement Costs - Subtotal $66,762 SITE FACILITIES COMMENTS Comprehensive drawings detailing the components of the systems listed above were not available for our review. We have included the estimated cost of the systems based upon our experience with other similar communities. We have assumed that 10 percent of the system(s) will require replacement every 20 years. In the future, this assumption and the estimated costs should be adjusted based upon actual experience at the community.

21 Replacement Reserve Inventory - Page B7 SITE UTILITIES PROJECTED REPLACEMENTS UNIT NORMAL REMAINING ITEM ITEM NUMBER REPLACEMENT ECONOMIC ECONOMIC REPLACEMENT # DESCRIPTION UNIT OF UNITS COST ($) LIFE (YRS) LIFE (YRS) COST ($) 52 Sanitary sewer - mains (10%) LS 1 $23, $23, Domestic water - mains (10%) LS 1 $14, $14, Storm water - structure & pipe (10%) LS 1 $27, $27,750 SITE UTILITIES - Replacement Costs - Subtotal $65,250 SITE UTILITIES COMMENTS

22 Replacement Reserve Inventory - Page B8 TOWNHOUSE & SINGLE-FAMILY EXTERIORS PROJECTED REPLACEMENTS UNIT NORMAL REMAINING ITEM ITEM NUMBER REPLACEMENT ECONOMIC ECONOMIC REPLACEMENT # DESCRIPTION UNIT OF UNITS COST ($) LIFE (YRS) LIFE (YRS) COST ($) 55 Asphalt shingles, 25% sf 37,951 $ $148, Asphalt shingles, 25% sf 37,951 $ $148, Asphalt shingles, 25% sf 37,951 $ $148, Asphalt shingles, 25% sf 37,951 $ $148, Gutter and downspouts, 25% ft 3,699 $ $16, Gutter and downspouts, 25% ft 3,699 $ $16, Gutter and downspouts, 25% ft 3,699 $ $16, Gutter and downspouts, 25% ft 3,699 $ $16, Siding, 10% sf 26,729 $ $160, Siding, 10% sf 26,729 $ $160, Siding, 10% sf 26,729 $ $160, Siding, 10% sf 26,729 $ $160, Siding, 10% sf 26,729 $ $160, Siding, 10% sf 26,729 $ $160, Siding, 10% sf 26,729 $ $160, Siding, 10% sf 26,729 $ $160, Siding, 10% sf 26,729 $ $160, Siding, 10% sf 26,729 $ $160,376 TOWNHOUSE & SINGLE-FAMILY EXTERIORS - Replacement Costs - Subtotal $2,262,365 TOWNHOUSE & SINGLE-FAMILY EXTERIORS COMMENTS We have assumed that the masonite siding will be replaced with a cement board siding.

23 Replacement Reserve Inventory - Page B9 TOWNHOUSE & SINGLE-FAMILY EXTERIORS PROJECTED REPLACEMENTS UNIT NORMAL REMAINING ITEM ITEM NUMBER REPLACEMENT ECONOMIC ECONOMIC REPLACEMENT # DESCRIPTION UNIT OF UNITS COST ($) LIFE (YRS) LIFE (YRS) COST ($) 73 Window shutters, 10% pr 46 $ none 2 $5, Window shutters, 10% pr 46 $ $5, Window shutters, 10% pr 46 $ $5, Window shutters, 10% pr 46 $ $5, Window shutters, 10% pr 46 $ $5, Window shutters, 10% pr 46 $ $5, Window shutters, 10% pr 46 $ $5, Window shutters, 10% pr 46 $ $5, Window shutters, 10% pr 46 $ $5, Window shutters, 10% pr 46 $ $5, Masonry tuckpointing, 10% sf 4,939 $ $24, Chimney caps ea 150 $ $18,750 TOWNHOUSE & SINGLE-FAMILY EXTERIORS - Replacement Costs - Subtotal $98,286 TOWNHOUSE & SINGLE-FAMILY EXTERIORS COMMENTS

24 Replacement Reserve Inventory - Page B10 SWIMMING POOL PROJECTED REPLACEMENTS UNIT NORMAL REMAINING ITEM ITEM NUMBER REPLACEMENT ECONOMIC ECONOMIC REPLACEMENT # DESCRIPTION UNIT OF UNITS COST ($) LIFE (YRS) LIFE (YRS) COST ($) 85 Swimming pool structure sf 920 $ $64, Swimming pool finish sf 920 $ $3, Swimming pool waterline tile lf 132 $ $5, Swimming pool coping, brick lf Swimming pool filter/chlorinator ls 1 $5, $5, Swimming pool valves & plumbing sf 920 $ $1, Swimming pool pump ea 1 $2, $2, Swimming pool concrete deck, 25% sf 801 $ $8, Swimming pool concrete deck, 25% sf 801 $ $8, Swimming pool concrete deck, 25% sf 801 $ $8, Swimming pool concrete deck, 25% sf 801 $ $8, Swimming pool furniture (25%) ls 1 $ $ Swimming pool furniture (25%) ls 1 $ $ Swimming pool furniture (25%) ls 1 $ $ Swimming pool furniture (25%) ls 1 $ $ Pool fence lf 230 $ $3,220 SWIMMING POOL - Replacement Costs - Subtotal $121,271 SWIMMING POOL COMMENTS We have assumed that the project to replace the pool deck will include the replacement of the plumbing and electrical systems installed beneath the pavement.

25 Replacement Reserve Inventory - Page B11 POOL BUILDING PROJECTED REPLACEMENTS UNIT NORMAL REMAINING ITEM ITEM NUMBER REPLACEMENT ECONOMIC ECONOMIC REPLACEMENT # DESCRIPTION UNIT OF UNITS COST ($) LIFE (YRS) LIFE (YRS) COST ($) 101 Pool building roof sf 1,142 $ $4, Pool building gutter & downspouts lf 148 $ $ Pool building soffit sf 432 $ $1, Pool building siding sf 380 $ $2, Pool building brick tuckpointing sf 640 $ $3, Pool building doors ea 5 $ $2, Pool building restroom fixtures ls 1 $4, $4, Pool building foot bridge surface sf 135 $ $1, Pool building foot bridge structure sf 135 $ $2, Pool building foot bridge railing lf 54 $ $594 POOL BUILDING - Replacement Costs - Subtotal $23,742 POOL BUILDING COMMENTS

26 Replacement Reserve Inventory - Page B12 tennis court PROJECTED REPLACEMENTS UNIT NORMAL REMAINING ITEM ITEM NUMBER REPLACEMENT ECONOMIC ECONOMIC REPLACEMENT # DESCRIPTION UNIT OF UNITS COST ($) LIFE (YRS) LIFE (YRS) COST ($) 111 Tennis court - base asphalt sf 12,840 $ none 2 $44, Tennis court - color coat sf 12,840 $ none 2 $9, Tennis court - fence ft 454 $ none 2 $8,172 tennis court - Replacement Costs - Subtotal $62,742 tennis court COMMENTS Tot lots and tot lot equipment should be evaluated annually by a playground safety specialist for compliance with the Consumer Product Safety Commission, Handbook for Public Playground Safety. Defects should be corrected immediately to protect the users of the facilities from potential injury and the Association from potential liability for those injuries.

27 Replacement Reserve Inventory - Page B13 VALUATION EXCLUSIONS EXCLUDED ITEMS UNIT NORMAL REMAINING ITEM ITEM NUMBER REPLACEMENT ECONOMIC ECONOMIC REPLACEMENT # DESCRIPTION UNIT OF UNITS COST ($) LIFE (YRS) LIFE (YRS) COST ($) Site lighting fixtures ls 1 3 EXCLUDED Miscellaneous signage ls 1 3 EXCLUDED Electric heaters ls 1 3 EXCLUDED Tennis court posts and nets ls 1 3 EXCLUDED VALUATION EXCLUSIONS COMMENTS Valuation Exclusions. For ease of administration of the Replacement Reserves and to reflect accurately how Replacement Reserves are administered, items with a dollar value less than $1, have not been scheduled for funding from Replacement Reserves. Examples of items excluded from funding by Replacement Reserves by this standard are listed above. The list above exemplifies exclusions by the cited standard(s) and is not intended to be comprehensive.

28 Replacement Reserve Inventory - Page B14 LONG-LIFE EXCLUSIONS EXCLUDED ITEMS UNIT NORMAL REMAINING ITEM ITEM NUMBER REPLACEMENT ECONOMIC ECONOMIC REPLACEMENT # DESCRIPTION UNIT OF UNITS COST ($) LIFE (YRS) LIFE (YRS) COST ($) Masonry features ls 1 3 EXCLUDED Miscellaneous culverts ls 1 3 EXCLUDED Exterior brick veneer ls 1 3 EXCLUDED Building foundation(s) ls 1 3 EXCLUDED Concrete floor slabs (interior) ls 1 3 EXCLUDED Wall, floor, & roof structure ls 1 3 EXCLUDED Common element electrical services ls 1 3 EXCLUDED LONG-LIFE EXCLUSIONS COMMENTS Long Life Exclusions. Components that when properly maintained, can be assumed to have a life equal to the property as a whole, are normally excluded from the Replacement Reserve Inventory. Examples of items excluded from funding by Replacement Reserves by this standard are listed above. Exterior masonry is generally assumed to have and unlimited economic life but periodic tuckpointing is required and we have included this for funding in the Replacement Reserve Inventory. The list above exemplifies exclusions by the cited standard(s) and is not intended to be comprehensive.

29 Replacement Reserve Inventory - Page B15 UNIT IMPROVEMENTS EXCLUSIONS EXCLUDED ITEMS UNIT NORMAL REMAINING ITEM ITEM NUMBER REPLACEMENT ECONOMIC ECONOMIC REPLACEMENT # DESCRIPTION UNIT OF UNITS COST ($) LIFE (YRS) LIFE (YRS) COST ($) Domestic water pipes serving one unit ls 1 3 EXCLUDED Sanitary sewers serving one unit ls 1 3 EXCLUDED Electrical wiring serving one unit ls 1 3 EXCLUDED Gas service serving one unit ls 1 3 EXCLUDED Cable TV service serving one unit ls 1 3 EXCLUDED Telephone service serving one unit ls 1 3 EXCLUDED Stairs on an individual lot ls 1 3 EXCLUDED Fence on an individual lot ls 1 3 EXCLUDED Unit windows & doors ls 1 3 EXCLUDED Unit deck, patio, and/or balcony ls 1 3 EXCLUDED Unit interior ls 1 3 EXCLUDED UNIT IMPROVEMENTS EXCLUSIONS COMMENTS Unit improvement Exclusions. We understand that the elements of the project that relate to a single unit are the responsibility of that unit owner. Examples of items excluded from funding by Replacement Reserves by this standard are listed above. The list above exemplifies exclusions by the cited standard(s) and is not intended to be comprehensive.

30 Replacement Reserve Inventory - Page B16 UTILITY EXCLUSIONS EXCLUDED ITEMS UNIT NORMAL REMAINING ITEM ITEM NUMBER REPLACEMENT ECONOMIC ECONOMIC REPLACEMENT # DESCRIPTION UNIT OF UNITS COST ($) LIFE (YRS) LIFE (YRS) COST ($) Primary electric feeds ls 1 3 EXCLUDED Electric transformers ls 1 3 EXCLUDED Cable TV systems and structures ls 1 3 EXCLUDED Telephone cables and structures ls 1 3 EXCLUDED Gas mains and meters ls 1 3 EXCLUDED UTILITY EXCLUSIONS COMMENTS Utility Exclusions. Many improvements owned by utility companies are on property owned by the Association. We have assumed that repair, maintenance, and replacements of these components will be done at the expense of the appropriate utility company. Examples of items excluded from funding Replacement Reserves by this standard are listed above. The list above exemplifies exclusions by the cited standard(s) and is not intended to be comprehensive.

31 Replacement Reserve Inventory - Page B17 MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR EXCLUSIONS EXCLUDED ITEMS UNIT NORMAL REMAINING ITEM ITEM NUMBER REPLACEMENT ECONOMIC ECONOMIC REPLACEMENT # DESCRIPTION UNIT OF UNITS COST ($) LIFE (YRS) LIFE (YRS) COST ($) Cleaning of asphalt pavement ls 1 3 EXCLUDED Painting of curbs ls 1 3 EXCLUDED Striping of parking spaces ls 1 3 EXCLUDED Numbering of parking spaces ls 1 3 EXCLUDED Landscaping and site grading ls 1 3 EXCLUDED Exterior painting ls 1 3 EXCLUDED MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR EXCLUSIONS COMMENTS Maintenance activities, one-time-only repairs, and capitol improvements. These activities are NOT appropriately funded from Replacement Reserves. The inclusion of such component in the Replacement Reserve Inventory could jeopardize the special tax status of ALL Replacement Reserves, exposing the Association to significant tax liabilities. We recommend that the Board of Directors discuss these exclusions and Revenue Ruling with a Certified Public Accountant. Examples of items excluded from funding by Replacement Reserves by this standard are listed above. The list above exemplifies exclusions by the cited standard(s) and is not intended to be comprehensive.

32 Replacement Reserve Inventory - Page B18 GOVERNMENT EXCLUSIONS EXCLUDED ITEMS UNIT NORMAL REMAINING ITEM ITEM NUMBER REPLACEMENT ECONOMIC ECONOMIC REPLACEMENT # DESCRIPTION UNIT OF UNITS COST ($) LIFE (YRS) LIFE (YRS) COST ($) State maintained roads ls 1 3 EXCLUDED Curb & gutter at State roads ls 1 3 EXCLUDED Sidewalks at state roads ls 1 3 EXCLUDED GOVERNMENT EXCLUSIONS COMMENTS Government Exclusions. We have assumed that some of the improvements installed on property owned by the Association will be maintained by the local government. Examples of items excluded from funding by Replacement Reserves by this standard are listed above. The list above exemplifies exclusions by the cited standard(s) and is not intended to be comprehensive.

33 Projected Annual Replacements - Page C1 PROJECTED ANNUAL REPLACEMENTS GENERAL INFORMATION CALENDAR OF ANNUAL REPLACEMENTS. The 113 Projected Replacements in the Newton Parish Replacement Reserve Inventory whose replacement is scheduled to be funded from Replacement Reserves are broken down on a year-by-year basis, beginning on Page C2. REPLACEMENT RESERVE ANALYSIS AND INVENTORY POLICES, PROCEDURES, AND ADMINISTRATION REVISIONS. Revisions will be made to the Replacement Reserve Analysis and Replacement Reserve Inventory in accordance with the written instructions of the Board of Directors. No additional charge is incurred for the first revision, if requested in writing within three months of the date of the Replacement Reserve Study. It is our policy to provide revisions in electronic (Adobe PDF) format only. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. Neither Miller - Dodson Associates nor the Reserve Analyst has any prior or existing relationship with this Association which would represent a real or perceived conflict of interest. RELIANCE ON DATA PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT. Information provided by an official representative of the Association regarding financial, physical conditions, quality, or historical issues is deemed reliable. INTENT. This Replacement Reserve Study is a reflection of the information provided by the Association and the visual evaluations of the Analyst. It has been prepared for the sole use of the Association and is not for the purpose of performing an audit, quality/forensic analyses, or background checks of historical records. PREVIOUS REPLACEMENTS. Information provided to Miller - Dodson Associates regarding prior replacements is considered to be accurate and reliable. Our visual evaluation is not a project audit or quality inspection. UPDATING. In the first two or possibly three years after the completion of a Level One Replacement Reserve Study, we recommend the Association review and revise the Replacement Reserve Analysis and Inventory annually to take into account replacements which have occurred and known changes in replacement costs. This can frequently be handled as a Level Two or Level Three Study (as defined by the Community Associations Institute), unless the Association has completed major replacement projects. A full analysis (Level One) based on a comprehensive visual evaluation of the site should be accomplished every three to five years or after each major replacement project. EXPERIENCE WITH FUTURE REPLACEMENTS. The Calendar of Annual Projected Replacements, lists replacements we have projected to occur over the next thirty years, begins on Page C2. Actual experience in replacing the items may differ significantly from the cost estimates and time frames shown because of conditions beyond our control. These differences may be caused by maintenance practices, inflation, variations in pricing and market conditions, future technological developments, regulatory actions, acts of God, and luck. Some items may function normally during our visual evaluation and then fail without notice. REVIEW OF THE REPLACEMENT RESERVE STUDY. For this study to be effective, it should be reviewed by the Newton Parish Board of Directors, those responsible for the management of the items included in the Replacement Reserve Inventory, and the accounting professionals employed by the Association.

34 Projected Annual Replacements - Page C2 PROJECTED REPLACEMENTS - YEARS 1 TO 6 Item 2008 $ Item 2009 $ Item 2010 $ 30 Seal coat Penny Hill Lane $5, Seal coat Ashbury Court $1, Seal coat Bracken Court $4, Seal coat Sweet Bay Lane $6, Seal coat Galloway Court $2, Siding, 10% $160, Seal coat Wythe Circle $3, Swimming pool finish $3, Window shutters, 10% $5, Window shutters, 10% $5, Swimming pool waterline tile $5, Tennis court - base asphalt $44, Swimming pool furniture (25 $ Tennis court - color coat $9, Pool building foot bridge sur $1, Tennis court - fence $8, Pool building foot bridge rail $594 Total Scheduled Replacements $82,617 Total Scheduled Replacements $15,042 Total Scheduled Replacements $169,964 Item 2011 $ Item 2012 $ Item 2013 $ 11 Concrete steps (6%) $1, Seal coat Weatherburn Lane $6, Brick steps (6%) $33, Seal coat Brynwick Place $1, Mailbox clusters $23, Penny Hill Lane asphalt $48, Seal coat no name $ Siding, 10% $160, Seal coat Penny Hill Lane $5, Wood retaining wall $8, Window shutters, 10% $5, Seal coat Sweet Bay Lane $6, Swimming pool furniture (25 $ Pool building doors $2, Seal coat Wythe Circle $3, Storage shed siding $1, Community sign $2, Masonry tuckpointing, 10% $24, Swimming pool furniture (25 $ Pool building soffit $1, Pool building siding $2, Tennis court - color coat $9,630 Total Scheduled Replacements $12,614 Total Scheduled Replacements $198,292 Total Scheduled Replacements $139,641

35 Projected Annual Replacements - Page C3 PROJECTED REPLACEMENTS - YEARS 7 TO 12 Item 2014 $ Item 2015 $ Item 2016 $ 1 Concrete flatwork (6%) $10, Bracken Court asphalt $37, Brynwick Place asphalt $9, Seal coat Ashbury Court $1, Seal coat Bracken Court $4, Seal coat Brynwick Place $1, Galloway Court asphalt $22, Swimming pool pump $2, Seal coat no name $ Seal coat Galloway Court $2, Swimming pool furniture (25 $ Siding, 10% $160, Siding, 10% $160, Window shutters, 10% $5, Window shutters, 10% $5, Swimming pool finish $3, Swimming pool concrete dec $8,213 Total Scheduled Replacements $211,353 Total Scheduled Replacements $44,337 Total Scheduled Replacements $180,287 Item 2017 $ Item 2018 $ Item 2019 $ 12 Concrete steps (6%) $1, Brick steps (6%) $33, Ashbury Court asphalt $16, Weatherburn Lane asphalt $56, Seal coat Penny Hill Lane $5, Seal coat Ashbury Court $1, Seal coat Weatherburn Lane $6, Sweet Bay Lane asphalt $54, Seal coat Galloway Court $2, Swimming pool furniture (25 $ Seal coat Sweet Bay Lane $6, Swimming pool furniture (25 $ Wythe Circle asphalt $27, Seal coat Wythe Circle $3, Storage shed roof $ Sanitary sewer - mains (10% $23, Domestic water - mains (10% $14, Storm water - structure & pip $27, Siding, 10% $160, Window shutters, 10% $5, Swimming pool filter/chlorina $5, Swimming pool valves & plu $1, Pool fence $3, Pool building restroom fixtur $4, Tennis court - color coat $9,630 Total Scheduled Replacements $65,580 Total Scheduled Replacements $386,580 Total Scheduled Replacements $21,301

36 Projected Annual Replacements - Page C4 PROJECTED REPLACEMENTS - YEARS 13 TO 18 Item 2020 $ Item 2021 $ Item 2022 $ 2 Concrete flatwork (6%) $10, Seal coat Brynwick Place $1, Seal coat Weatherburn Lane $6, Seal coat Bracken Court $4, No name off of Sweet Bay a $7, Asphalt shingles, 25% $148, Siding, 10% $160, Seal coat no name $ Gutter and downspouts, 25% $16, Window shutters, 10% $5, Swimming pool furniture (25 $ Siding, 10% $160, Swimming pool concrete dec $8, Window shutters, 10% $5,484 Total Scheduled Replacements $188,655 Total Scheduled Replacements $10,391 Total Scheduled Replacements $336,793 Item 2023 $ Item 2024 $ Item 2025 $ 13 Concrete steps (6%) $1, Seal coat Ashbury Court $1, Seal coat Bracken Court $4, Brick steps (6%) $33, Seal coat Galloway Court $2, Window shutters, 10% $5, Seal coat Penny Hill Lane $5, Asphalt shingles, 25% $148, Swimming pool pump $2, Seal coat Sweet Bay Lane $6, Gutter and downspouts, 25% $16, Swimming pool furniture (25 $ Seal coat Wythe Circle $3, Siding, 10% $160, Window shutters, 10% $5, Window shutters, 10% $5, Masonry tuckpointing, 10% $24, Swimming pool waterline tile $5, Swimming pool finish $3, Pool building brick tuckpoint $3, Swimming pool furniture (25 $ Pool building foot bridge sur $1, Pool building roof $4, Pool building foot bridge stru $2, Pool building gutter & downs $ Pool building foot bridge rail $ Tennis court - base asphalt $44, Tennis court - color coat $9, Tennis court - fence $8,172 Total Scheduled Replacements $151,934 Total Scheduled Replacements $347,728 Total Scheduled Replacements $12,628

37 Projected Annual Replacements - Page C5 PROJECTED REPLACEMENTS - YEARS 19 TO 24 Item 2026 $ Item 2027 $ Item 2028 $ 3 Concrete flatwork (6%) $10, Seal coat Weatherburn Lane $6, Brick steps (6%) $33, Seal coat Brynwick Place $1, Window shutters, 10% $5, Seal coat Penny Hill Lane $5, Seal coat no name $ Swimming pool furniture (25 $ Seal coat Sweet Bay Lane $6, Asphalt shingles, 25% $148, Seal coat Wythe Circle $3, Gutter and downspouts, 25% $16, Storage shed siding $1, Siding, 10% $160, Community sign $2, Window shutters, 10% $5, Asphalt shingles, 25% $148, Swimming pool concrete dec $8, Gutter and downspouts, 25% $16, Siding, 10% $160, Tennis court - color coat $9,630 Total Scheduled Replacements $351,096 Total Scheduled Replacements $12,406 Total Scheduled Replacements $386,936 Item 2029 $ Item 2030 $ Item 2031 $ 14 Concrete steps (6%) $1, Seal coat Bracken Court $4, Seal coat Brynwick Place $1, Seal coat Ashbury Court $1, Swimming pool finish $3, Seal coat no name $ Seal coat Galloway Court $2, Wood retaining wall $8, Window shutters, 10% $5, Window shutters, 10% $5, Swimming pool structure $64, Chimney caps $18, Swimming pool furniture (25 $ Swimming pool furniture (25 $640 Total Scheduled Replacements $76,542 Total Scheduled Replacements $7,324 Total Scheduled Replacements $35,120

38 Projected Annual Replacements - Page C6 PROJECTED REPLACEMENTS - YEARS 25 TO 30 Item 2032 $ Item 2033 $ Item 2034 $ 4 Concrete flatwork (6%) $10, Brick steps (6%) $33, Seal coat Ashbury Court $1, Seal coat Weatherburn Lane $6, Penny Hill Lane asphalt $48, Galloway Court asphalt $22, Mailbox clusters $23, Seal coat Penny Hill Lane $5, Seal coat Galloway Court $2, Swimming pool concrete dec $8, Seal coat Sweet Bay Lane $6, Pool building doors $2, Seal coat Wythe Circle $3, Window shutters, 10% $5, Masonry tuckpointing, 10% $24, Swimming pool furniture (25 $ Pool fence $3, Pool building soffit $1, Tennis court - color coat $9,630 Total Scheduled Replacements $51,123 Total Scheduled Replacements $142,089 Total Scheduled Replacements $26,802 Item 2035 $ Item 2036 $ Item 2037 $ 15 Concrete steps (6%) $1, Brynwick Place asphalt $9, Weatherburn Lane asphalt $56, Bracken Court asphalt $37, Seal coat Brynwick Place $1, Seal coat Weatherburn Lane $6, Seal coat Bracken Court $4, Seal coat no name $ Window shutters, 10% $5, Window shutters, 10% $5, Swimming pool finish $3, Swimming pool pump $2, Swimming pool furniture (25 $ Swimming pool furniture (25 $640 Total Scheduled Replacements $51,549 Total Scheduled Replacements $11,206 Total Scheduled Replacements $72,556

39 Miller - Dodson Associates, Inc. Condition Assessment - Page D1 Newton Parish February 6, 2008 CONDITION ASSESSMENT General Comments. Miller - Dodson Associates conducted a Reserve Study at Newton Parish in February, Newton Parish is in average condition for a condominium community constructed in A review of the Replacement Reserve Inventory will show that we are anticipating most of the components achieving their normal economic lives. The following comments pertain to the larger, more significant components in the Replacement Reserve Inventory and to those items that are unique or deserving of attention because of their condition or the manner in which they have been treated in the Replacement Reserve Analysis or Inventory. SITE IMPROVEMENTS Concrete Flatwork. The concrete flatwork includes the community sidewalks and unit lead walks. The Association maintains an inventory of approximately 23,283 square feet of concrete flatwork. The overall condition of the concrete flatwork is fair with multiple areas of defects. The defects noted include the following: Cracking. There are multiple sections of the concrete flatwork that have cracked creating trip hazards. Heaving/Settlement. Sections of the concrete flatwork have heaved or settled relative to their adjacent sections, creating trip hazards. Scaling and Flaking. Several sections of the concrete flatwork are scaling and flaking. Scaling and flaking is the loss of the surface mortar in concrete. It is typically caused by water freezing within the concrete. Once started, scaling and flaking can be expected to continue to grow as a result of exposure of the concrete to freeze-thaw cycles. These scaled sections are creating trip hazards. The standards we used for recommending replacement are as follows: 1. Trip hazard, 0.5 inch height difference. 2. Severe cracking. 3. Severe spalling 4. Uneven riser heights on steps. 5. Steps with risers in excess of 8.25 inches. Because it is highly unlikely that all of the community s concrete components will fail and require replacement in the period of the study, we have programmed funds for the replacement of 60% of the inventory and spread those funds over a 60-year timeframe to reflect the incremental nature of this work. This approach assumes a failure rate of 1% per year. Concrete Steps. The community has a several sets of exterior steps that are constructed from poured concrete. The steps currently are in good condition. The standards we used for recommending replacement are as follows: Trip hazard, 0.5 inch height difference. Severe cracking. Severe spalling Uneven riser heights on steps. Steps with risers in excess of 8.25 inches.

40 Miller - Dodson Associates, Inc. Condition Assessment - Page D2 Newton Parish February 6, 2008 Because it is highly unlikely that all of the community s concrete components will fail and require replacement in the period of the study, we have programmed funds for the replacement of 60% of the inventory and spread those funds over a 60-year timeframe to reflect the incremental nature of this work. This approach assumes a failure rate of 1% per year. Brick Steps. The community has exterior steps that are of brick construction at the entrance to most of the units. The steps vary in condition from good to poor with a number of defects. The defects noted include the following: Failed Mortar Joints. A number of the mortar joints between the bricks have failed and are in need of tuckpointing. Cracks. Movement of the base material under the bricks has resulted in the development of cracks in a number of the brick steps. Broken Nosing. We noted a number of locations where the nosing of the brick steps was damaged, creating an uneven edge that poses a trip hazard Settlement. We noted several locations where steps have settled, creating uneven surfaces that pose a trip hazard. Because it is highly unlikely that all of the community s brick steps will fail and require replacement in the period of the study, we have programmed funds for the replacement of 60% of the inventory and spread those funds over a 60-year timeframe to reflect the incremental nature of this work. This approach assumes a failure rate of 1% per year. Asphalt Pavement. The site includes asphalt pavement for vehicle access and parking. In general, the asphalt pavement is in fair to poor condition with multiple areas of defects. The Association maintains an inventory of 193,521 square feet of asphalt pavement, including the following streets and parking areas: The defects noted include the following: Location Area (square feet) Penny Hill Lane 33,222 Brynwick Place 6,422 Ashbury Court 11,290 Sweet Bay Lane 37,900 (no name) 5,418 Galloway Court 15,525 Bracken Court 25,650 Weatherburn Lane 39,262 Wythe Circle 18,822 Total: 193,521 Open Cracks. There are multiple locations where open cracks are allowing water to penetrate to the asphalt base and the bearing soils beneath the pavement. This water will erode the base accelerating the deterioration of the asphalt pavement. If the cracks have allowed the deterioration of the base materials and the bearing soil, the damaged areas should be removed and replaced. All other cracks should be cleaned and filled. Alligatoring. There are multiple locations where the asphalt has developed a pattern of cracking known as alligatoring. Alligatoring is the result of an unstable base under the asphalt. Shifting in the base causes the asphalt to crack and shift, forming the cracks that resemble the skin of an alligator. Once these cracks extend through the asphalt, they will allow water to penetrate to the

41 Miller - Dodson Associates, Inc. Condition Assessment - Page D3 Newton Parish February 6, 2008 base, accelerating the rate of deterioration. The only solution is to remove the defective asphalt and compact the base before new asphalt is installed. Potholes. There are a number of locations where potholes have formed as the result of the failure of the underlying base material or the surface material. Repair will require removal of the asphalt and base material, installation and compaction of new base material, and resurfacing with asphalt. Depressions. There are areas where the asphalt surface is depressed due to deformation in the surface or underlying layers. These depressions may continue to grow with exposure to traffic. Water ponding was noted in several of these areas. Repair will require removal of the asphalt and base material, installation and compaction of new base material, and resurfacing with asphalt. Tree Root Damage. There are locations where roots from trees planted near the asphalt surface have pushed up through the asphalt, causing cracks and heaving. Repair of these areas will require removal of the asphalt and the tree roots. Cracking Along Edges. Sections of the asphalt pavement have developed cracks along their edges as a result of a lack of curbing to hold it in place. The pavement will continue to deteriorate with time. Photo 1 - Typical alligatoring Photo 2 - Typical broken up section As a rule of thumb, asphalt should be overlayed when approximately five percent of the surface area has become cracked or has failed. The normal service life of asphalt pavement is typically 18 to 20 years. In order to maintain the condition of the pavement throughout the community and to insure the longest life of the asphalt, we recommend a systematic and comprehensive maintenance program that includes: 1. Crack Sealing. All cracks should be sealed with an appropriate sealing compound to prevent water infiltration through the asphalt compound into the base. This repair should be done annually. This is an entirely different process from the seal coating discussed below. Crack sealing is normally considered a maintenance activity and is not funded from Reserves. Areas of extensive cracking or deterioration that cannot be made watertight by crack sealing should be cut out and patched. 2. Cleaning. Long-term exposure to oil or gas breaks down asphalt. Because this asphalt pavement is generally not used for long term parking, it is unlikely that frequent cleaning will be necessary. When necessary, spill areas should be cleaned, or if deterioration has penetrated the asphalt, patched. This is a maintenance activity, and we have assumed that it will not be funded from Reserves.

42 Miller - Dodson Associates, Inc. Condition Assessment - Page D4 Newton Parish February 6, Seal Coating. The asphalt should be seal coated every three to five years. For this maintenance activity to be effective in extending the life of the asphalt, the crack sealing and cleaning of the asphalt, discussed above should be done first. Pricing used in the study is based on a recent contract for a two inch overlay and reflects the current local market. Storage Shed. The association maintains a storage shed by the community pool. We have included the roof and the siding from the shed in the reserve analysis. Mailboxes. The cluster mailboxes located throughout the community are in fair condition, with moderate rust on most units. We have assumed that when the mailboxes are replaced, fiberglass units will be installed. Photo 3 - Typical mailbox cluster Pressure Treated Wood Retaining Wall. The Association maintains a single wood retaining wall. The general condition of the retaining wall is fair to poor. The defects noted include the following: Bowing. We found a number of areas where sections of the retaining walls are bowing outward. Bowing occurs as the result of moderate to severe loading of the wall by the material being supported. If the bowing is allowed to continue, eventually it will lead to the failure of the retaining wall. Correcting bowing requires replacement of the sections of retaining wall and installation of better drainage materials behind the wall. Leaning. We found a number of areas where sections of the retaining walls are leaning. Leaning occurs when the pressure of the material being held in place by the retaining wall is sufficient to cause the wall to shift away from the vertical. Once a retaining wall starts to lean, it is at risk of failing and must be replaced. Rot. We found a number of areas where sections of the retaining walls have moderate rot. Once rotting occurs, those effected sections must be replaced.

43 Miller - Dodson Associates, Inc. Condition Assessment - Page D5 Newton Parish February 6, 2008 Photo 4 - Wood retaining wall Photo 5 - Rotted section of retaining wall When it becomes necessary to replace these walls, we recommend the Association consider one of the segmental block retaining wall systems instead of the wood construction. These systems are impervious to decay, which occurs even with the pressure treated wood systems. If over time the wall experiences movement, sections of the walls can be re-stacked at a very small portion of the cost of a new wall. These walls have an initial cost 15 to 30 percent greater than wood walls but once installed, they have a service life of 40 years or more. Underground Utilities. The Association is responsible for the maintenance of the underground utility lines, including the water mains and sanitary sewer lines. No engineering drawings were available to accurately determine distances, sizes of lines and materials used for underground components of the system. Accordingly, we have provided an estimate of the approximate replacement cost based on our experience with other communities of similar size and on our inspection of the visible components while on site. Inspection of the underground lines and structures is beyond the scope of work of this study. BUILDING EXTERIORS Asphalt Shingle Roofing. The asphalt shingle roofs are in good condition. We have estimated the remaining useful life of the roofs based on the conditions seen at the site as well as the age of the roofs. We have assumed that when the roofs eventually will require replacement, all roofs will be replaced with 20 year roofs. We have assumed that the gutters and downspouts will be replaced when the roofs are replaced. Due to the large inventory and the varying rates at which the roofing materials will age and require replacement, we have divided the roof inventory into four equal components and spread their replacement over a six year period.

44 Miller - Dodson Associates, Inc. Condition Assessment - Page D6 Newton Parish February 6, 2008 Masonite Siding. The masonite siding on the buildings is in poor overall condition. We understand that the community has maintained an inventory of replacement sections of siding, but that all sections have now been used. With masonite siding no longer available, cement fiber siding has been customized and used as a replacement on a board by board basis. Defects we noted include the following: Loose Sections. We found numerous areas with loose sections of siding. Loose sections can easily be torn from the building by even moderate winds. It is recommended that all loose sections be reattached as soon as possible. Swelling. There are numerous areas where the masonite siding is swelling along its edges. Swelling in masonite siding is an indication that moisture has penetrated the surface. All boards with swelling will require replacement. Disintegration. There are a number of areas where the masonite siding is disintegrating due to moisture. All damaged boards will require replacement. We recommend that the community consider replacing the masonite siding on a building by building basis with cement fiber siding. This will allow the replacement o take place without having to modify the replacement siding to match the existing siding. Due to the large inventory and the varying rates at which the siding materials will age and require replacement, we have divided the siding inventory into ten equal components and spread their replacement over a twenty year period. Window Shutters. We have phased the replacement of the window shutters to take place at the same time that the siding is replaced. Brickwork. The brickwork on the buildings is in good condition. Brick is usually considered to be a life of structure item and therefore excluded from reserve funding. Because weather and other conditions result in the slow deterioration of the mortar in the brick joints, we have included funding in the Reserve Analysis for tuckpointing. We have assumed that ten percent of the brick will require tuckpointing every ten years. Chimney Caps. All chimney caps were replaced approximately two years ago. We have assumed a 25- year service life for the caps. RECREATIONAL FACILITIES Photo 6 - Damaged sections of siding, typical Swimming Pool. The community operates an outdoor pool of concrete construction with a concrete deck. The concrete deck is not coated. Listed below are the major components of the pool facilities; Pool Shell. The shell for the swimming pool is in good condition. Pool shells normally have a finite life of approximately 45 years. At that time it may not be necessary to replace the entire structure. However, it is prudent to anticipate a major expenditure for replacement of underground lines and sections of the pool. Based on our research, we have found it to be prudent to program $70 per square foot of pool surface to cover these needs. Pool Deck. The pool has a concrete. The overall condition of the deck is good. Because it is highly unlikely that all of the community s concrete pool deck sections will fail and require

45 Miller - Dodson Associates, Inc. Condition Assessment - Page D7 Newton Parish February 6, 2008 replacement at the same time, we have divided the deck into four equal components in the Reserve Analysis and have spread their replacement over a eighteen year period. Whitecoat. The pool whitecoat is in poor condition. We have assumed a service life of seven years for the pool whitecoat. Coping. The pool is edged with brick coping. The coping is in fair condition. Waterline Tile. The waterline tile is in fair condition. We have assumed that the waterline tile will be replaced or restored when the pool is whitecoated. Pump and Filter System. The filter system is in good operating condition. We have assumed a service life of 20 years for the filter system, and 10 years for the pump. Photo 7 - The community pool Photo 8 - Typical coping section Pool Building. The pool building houses two small restrooms and the pool equipment. Listed below are the major components of the pool building: Roof. The asphalt shingle roof is in good condition. We have estimated the remaining useful life of the roof based on the conditions seen at the site as well as the age of the roof. We have assumed that when the roof eventually will require replacement, it will be replaced with a 20 year roof. We have assumed that the gutters and downspouts will be replaced when the roof is replaced. Photo 9 - The pool building Siding. The pool building also has masonite siding. We recommend that the community consider replacing the masonite siding with cement fiber siding. Fixtures. We have assumed a 20 year service life for the restroom fixtures. Tennis Courts. The community maintains two tennis courts. The overall condition of these courts is poor. Listed below are the major components of the tennis court facilities. Asphalt Pavement. The asphalt pavement for the tennis court is in poor condition with cracks and splits that extend into the playing surface. We have assumed a service life of 20 years for the asphalt.

46 Miller - Dodson Associates, Inc. Condition Assessment - Page D8 Newton Parish February 6, 2008 Color Coat. The color coat on the tennis courts is in poor condition with some major defects in its finish. Fencing. The fencing installed around the tennis courts is chain link and in good condition. There were no noted defects. We have assumed that the fencing will be replaced when the asphalt pavement is replaced. Photo 10 - Crack between courts Photo 11 - Crack in playing surface This Condition Assessment is based upon our visual survey of the property. The sole purpose of the visual survey was an evaluation of the common elements of the property to ascertain the remaining useful life and the replacement costs of these common elements. Our evaluation assumed that all components met building code requirements in force at the time of construction. Our visual survey was conducted with care by experienced persons, but no warranty or guarantee is expressed or implied. End of Condition Assessment

REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2010 WOODWIND ASSOCIATION. N & H Enterprises MILLER ~ DODSON ASSOCIATES. Community Management by:

REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2010 WOODWIND ASSOCIATION. N & H Enterprises MILLER ~ DODSON ASSOCIATES. Community Management by: REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2010 WOODWIND ASSOCIATION WOODWIND ASSOCIATION REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2010 Community Management by: N & H Enterprises PO Box 5539 Greenville, SC 29607 864-467-1600

More information

TIMBERLAKE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION

TIMBERLAKE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION TIMBERLAKE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2014 TIMBERLAKE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2014 Community Management by: Mr. Phil Massa, AMS, PCAM 933 Windsor Oaks

More information

REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2015 WOODBRIDGE CONDOMINIUM CHESAPEAKE BAY MANAGEMENT. Community Management by: Ms. Kimberly Marston

REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2015 WOODBRIDGE CONDOMINIUM CHESAPEAKE BAY MANAGEMENT. Community Management by: Ms. Kimberly Marston REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2015 WOODBRIDGE CONDOMINIUM WOODBRIDGE CONDOMINIUM REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2015 Community Management by: CHESAPEAKE BAY MANAGEMENT Ms. Kimberly Marston 100 Volvo Parkway,

More information

REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2011 VILLAGE GREEN HOA. Ravenel Associates, Inc. Community Management by: Chad Hammond, Property Manager

REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2011 VILLAGE GREEN HOA. Ravenel Associates, Inc. Community Management by: Chad Hammond, Property Manager REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2011 VILLAGE GREEN HOA VILLAGE GREEN HOA REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2011 Community Management by: Ravenel Associates, Inc. Chad Hammond, Property Manager 3690 Bohicket

More information

REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2016

REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2016 REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2016 VILLAS AT PARKWOOD ESTATES VILLAS AT PARKWOOD ESTATES REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2016 Community Management by: Community Management Professionals, LLC Beth Maurer

More information

REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2016

REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2016 REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2016 EVANS MILL POND REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2016 EVANS MILL POND Community Management by: EVANS MILL POND, HOA Evans Mill Road McLean, Virginia 22101 Consultant: 929

More information

The Ford Plantation - POA Revised August 17, THE FORD10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Ford Plantation - POA Revised August 17, THE FORD10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Replacement Reserve Analysis - Page A1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Ford Plantation - POA Replacement Reserve Inventory identifies 77 Projected Replacements for funding from Replacement Reserves, with an estimated

More information

REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2017 CAMDEN TOWNES ROCKTOWN REALTY. Community Management by: Bernard Hamann

REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2017 CAMDEN TOWNES ROCKTOWN REALTY. Community Management by: Bernard Hamann REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2017 CAMDEN TOWNES REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2017 CAMDEN TOWNES Community Management by: ROCKTOWN REALTY Bernard Hamann 218 Market Street Harrisonburg, VA 22801 40-70-7080

More information

FLINT HILL MANOR FLINT HILL MANOR. Replacement Reserve Study. Oakton, Virginia. Property Management: Flint Hill Manor Townhouse Association

FLINT HILL MANOR FLINT HILL MANOR. Replacement Reserve Study. Oakton, Virginia. Property Management: Flint Hill Manor Townhouse Association Replacement Reserve Study REPLACEMENT RESERVE STUDY Oakton, Virginia Property Management: Flint Hill Manor Townhouse Association Jamie Critchfield Vice President Email: tommie0200@aol.com Consultant: RICHARD

More information

OCEAN NEIGHBORS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2017 POSTON & COMPANY. Community Management by: Melissa Blocker, Property Manager

OCEAN NEIGHBORS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2017 POSTON & COMPANY. Community Management by: Melissa Blocker, Property Manager REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2017 OCEAN NEIGHBORS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION OCEAN NEIGHBORS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2017 Community Management by: POSTON & COMPANY Melissa Blocker,

More information

REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2019 SANCTUARY AT FALSE CAPE. Prepared for: Ms. Rebecca Beamon

REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2019 SANCTUARY AT FALSE CAPE. Prepared for: Ms. Rebecca Beamon SANCTUARY AT FALSE CAPE REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2019 SANCTUARY AT FALSE CAPE REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2019 Prepared for: SANCTUARY AT FALSE CAPE Ms. Rebecca Beamon 3700 Sandpiper Road Virginia

More information

REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2018 SANCTUARY AT FALSE CAPE. Prepared for: Ms. Rebecca Beamon

REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2018 SANCTUARY AT FALSE CAPE. Prepared for: Ms. Rebecca Beamon SANCTUARY AT FALSE CAPE REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2018 SANCTUARY AT FALSE CAPE REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2018 Prepared for: SANCTUARY AT FALSE CAPE Ms. Rebecca Beamon 3700 Sandpiper Road Virginia

More information

CAPITAL RESERVE STUDY. Meadow Wood Commons. City, State

CAPITAL RESERVE STUDY. Meadow Wood Commons. City, State CAPITAL RESERVE STUDY FOR THE Meadow Wood Commons City, State Management Company: Any Management Company Contact Name: Mr. Bob Smith Date: July 28, 2014 Table of Contents Section Name Section # Executive

More information

REPLACEMENT RESERVE STUDY 2006

REPLACEMENT RESERVE STUDY 2006 CLOPPERS MILL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION REPLACEMENT RESERVE STUDY 2006 MILLER DODSON ASSOCIATES CAPITAL RESERVE CONSULTANTS 929 West Street, Suite 310 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 Tel: 800.850.2835 Fax: 410.268.8483

More information

REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2017 TOWNE SQUARE MASTER ASSOCIATION

REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2017 TOWNE SQUARE MASTER ASSOCIATION REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2017 TOWNE SQUARE MASTER ASSOCIATION REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2017 TOWNE SQUARE MASTER ASSOCIATION Community Management by: PROPERTY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES Sharon Grozich

More information

Level 3 Reserve Study without a Site a Site Visit Visit

Level 3 Reserve Study without a Site a Site Visit Visit Level 3 Reserve Study without a Site a Site Visit Visit We offer two types of reports for a Level 3 Reserve Study with a Site Visit, RS-3 - Standard Reserve Study without a site visit SMRS-3 - Statutory

More information

VILLAGE AT LAKE CHELAN

VILLAGE AT LAKE CHELAN VILLAGE AT LAKE CHELAN Manson, Washington STANDARD LEVEL 3 RESERVE STUDY UPDATE WITHOUT A SITE VISIT With funding recommendations for the 2019 fiscal year Issued October, 2018 Next Update: Level 3 by October,

More information

DUNN LORING VILLAGE SEQUOIA MANAGEMENT COMPANY. Craig Courtney Property Manager. Vienna, Virginia. Property Management: Consultant:

DUNN LORING VILLAGE SEQUOIA MANAGEMENT COMPANY. Craig Courtney Property Manager. Vienna, Virginia. Property Management: Consultant: Replacement Reserve Study DUNN LORING VILLAGE RSTUDY+ REPLACEMENT RESERVE STUDY DUNN LORING VILLAGE Vienna, Virginia Property Management: SEQUOIA MANAGEMENT COMPANY Craig Courtney Property Manager 13998

More information

SOMERSET CREEK STANDARD LEVEL 3 RESERVE STUDY UPDATE WITHOUT A SITE VISIT. With funding recommendations for the 2019 fiscal year

SOMERSET CREEK STANDARD LEVEL 3 RESERVE STUDY UPDATE WITHOUT A SITE VISIT. With funding recommendations for the 2019 fiscal year SOMERSET CREEK Bellevue, Washington STANDARD LEVEL 3 RESERVE STUDY UPDATE WITHOUT A SITE VISIT With funding recommendations for the 2019 fiscal year Issued April, 2018 Next Update: Level 2 by April, 2019

More information

WHAT IS A RESERVE STUDY AND WHY ARE THEY IMPORTANT?

WHAT IS A RESERVE STUDY AND WHY ARE THEY IMPORTANT? WHAT IS A RESERVE STUDY AND WHY ARE THEY IMPORTANT? Tom Larson, PE, RS, PRA Facility Engineering Associates, PC What is a Reserve Study? A budget planning tool which identifies the current status of the

More information

THE VINEYARDS AT DUBLIN GREENE OWNERS ASSOCIATION

THE VINEYARDS AT DUBLIN GREENE OWNERS ASSOCIATION THE VINEYARDS AT DUBLIN GREENE OWNERS ASSOCIATION Full Reserve Study With On-site Visual Inspection October 3, 2018 Reserve Study for Fiscal Year: 01/01/2019 through 12/31/2019 2059 Camden Ave. Suite 151

More information

CAPITAL RESERVE STUDY

CAPITAL RESERVE STUDY CAPITAL RESERVE STUDY FOR THE HIALEAH CONDOMINIUM WILDWOOD CREST, NEW JERSEY Project Number: 12-1066 W:\2012\12-1066\CORR\12-1066v1.doc Date: March 29, 2013 Table of Contents Section Page Executive Summary...

More information

What are Capital Reserves?

What are Capital Reserves? Capital Reserves What are Capital Reserves? A separate account set up by the Association to fund large, non-annual repairs Stormwater pond repair, dredging and drainage improvements Fence repair, retaining

More information

DRAFT CAPITAL RESERVE STUDY. The Piano Works Condominium Association. Deep River, Connecticut FOR THE. Project Number:

DRAFT CAPITAL RESERVE STUDY. The Piano Works Condominium Association. Deep River, Connecticut FOR THE. Project Number: CAPITAL RESERVE STUDY DRAFT FOR THE Management Company: Sound Real Estate Services, Contact Name: Josh Parsons Date: August 22, 2016 Table of Contents Section Name Section # Executive Summary... 1 Reserve

More information

BRAMBLETON REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2016 BRAMBLETON, VIRGINIA. Property Management: Brambleton Community Association. Mr.

BRAMBLETON REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2016 BRAMBLETON, VIRGINIA. Property Management: Brambleton Community Association. Mr. REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT - FY 2016 BRAMBLETON BRAMBLETON, VIRGINIA BRAMBLETON COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2016 Property Management: Brambleton Community Association Mr. Richard

More information

WOODBRIDGE AT EAGLE HARBOR CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2016

WOODBRIDGE AT EAGLE HARBOR CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2016 WOODBRIDGE AT EAGLE HARBOR CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS COMPILATION REPORT 1 BALANCE SHEET 2 STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND

More information

Cottonwoods at Vine. Reserve Study. October 2012

Cottonwoods at Vine. Reserve Study. October 2012 Reserve Study October 2012 Tab Table of Contents Reserve Study Analysis Executive Summary... Remaining Useful Life Analysis... Reserve Study Schedule... Annual Expenditures... Funding Plan Summary... Percentage

More information

HUDSON PARK ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION HUDSON, OHIO

HUDSON PARK ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION HUDSON, OHIO RESERVE FUND STUDY HUDSON PARK ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION HUDSON, OHIO Criterium Liszkay Engineers 110 N. High St. Gahanna, OH 43230 614-418-7200 www.clengineers.com AUGUST 2016 CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...

More information

.USI.COMMERCIAL. (888) Funding Reserve Analysis. for. The Retreat at Gleannloch Farms Homeowners Association Spring, TX

.USI.COMMERCIAL. (888) Funding Reserve Analysis. for. The Retreat at Gleannloch Farms Homeowners Association Spring, TX .USI.COMMERCIAL (888)225-3755 www.usicommercial.com Funding Reserve Analysis for The Retreat at Gleannloch Farms Homeowners Association Spring, TX October 14, 2014 Page 1 of 31 Pages Funding Reserve Analysis

More information

FIR RIDGE II CONDOMINIUM

FIR RIDGE II CONDOMINIUM FIR RIDGE II CONDOMINIUM BELLINGHAM, WASHINGTON UPDATE WITHOUT SITE VISIT FEBRUARY 2014 FOR USE WITH THE FEBRUARY 2012 RESERVE STUDY PREPARED BY: DENISE DANA, RESERVE SPECIALIST M. ARCH, REGISTERED ARCHITECT

More information

CAPITAL RESERVE STUDY. Providence Corner. Upper Providence Twp.

CAPITAL RESERVE STUDY. Providence Corner. Upper Providence Twp. CAPITAL RESERVE STUDY FOR THE Providence Corner Upper Providence Twp. Management Company: The Galman Group Contact Name: Ms. Debra Lynch Date: September 28, 2016 Table of Contents Section Name Section

More information

RESERVE STUDY SPECIALISTS

RESERVE STUDY SPECIALISTS RESERVE STUDY SPECIALISTS P.O. BOX 9178, CALABASAS, CA 91372 TEL: 818-992-1312 FAX: 818-992-1338 VILLAGE GREEN EAST HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION FULL RESERVE STUDY September 06, 2017 for Fiscal Year 2018 RESERVE

More information

PROFESSIONAL RESERVE STUDY

PROFESSIONAL RESERVE STUDY PROFESSIONAL RESERVE STUDY LEVEL 3 UPDATE Bridgewood Estates 2500 Jahn Avenue Northwest, Gig Harbor, WA 98335 For: Bridgewood Estates Homeowners Association c/o Juanita Carbaugh, Property Manager HOA Community

More information

Reserve Analysis Report

Reserve Analysis Report Reserve Analysis Report Sample HOA 2663 S Oakland St Los Angeles, CA Level I Study with Site Inspection Fiscal Year End: 11/30/2016 Phone: 858-764-1895 Fax: 800-436-3816 brian@mccafferyreserveconsulting.com

More information

2014 Reserve Study. The Bear Creek Crossing Owner's Association, Inc. Bear Haven Way Sevierville, Tennessee Report No: 2921 Version 2

2014 Reserve Study. The Bear Creek Crossing Owner's Association, Inc. Bear Haven Way Sevierville, Tennessee Report No: 2921 Version 2 2014 Reserve Study The Bear Creek Crossing Owner's Association, Inc. Bear Haven Way Sevierville, Tennessee 37862 Report No: 2921 Version 2 For the Period From: January 1, 2014 To: December 31, 2014 TABLE

More information

LEVEL 3 RESERVE STUDY UPDATE For ORCHARD GREENS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.

LEVEL 3 RESERVE STUDY UPDATE For ORCHARD GREENS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. LEVEL 3 RESERVE STUDY UPDATE For ORCHARD GREENS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. Woodburn, OR January 1, 2015 December 31, 2015 Project No: OR 11101 0006 5 Prepared By: Carson M. Horton, RS Quality Check By:

More information

RESERVESTUDYUPDATE. The Villas at Blackberry Run Dallas, GA. Prepared for:

RESERVESTUDYUPDATE. The Villas at Blackberry Run Dallas, GA. Prepared for: RESERVESTUDYUPDATE Dallas, GA Prepared for: THE VILLAS AT BLACKBERRY RUN HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. Carl Swanson-President Prepared by: CRITERIUM-CARUSO ENGINEERS 1065 POWERS PLACE, SUITE B ALPHARETTA,

More information

Reserve Analysis Report

Reserve Analysis Report Reserve Analysis Report Park Avenue 244 Quari St Denver, CO Level II Study with Site Inspection Fiscal Year End Date: 12/31/2016 Phone: 858-764-1895 Fax: 800-436-3816 brian@mccafferyreserveconsulting.com

More information

CAPTIvA SANDS. REPLACEMENT REsERvE REPORT FY2O1O. millerdodson I. Ms. Pam Conti. 50 Cascade Lane Rehoboth Beach, Delaware

CAPTIvA SANDS. REPLACEMENT REsERvE REPORT FY2O1O. millerdodson I. Ms. Pam Conti. 50 Cascade Lane Rehoboth Beach, Delaware REPLACEMENT REsERvE REPORT FY2O1O CAPTIvA SANDS Ms. Pam Conti 50 Cascade Lane Rehoboth Beach, Delaware 302.227.8448 Consultant: millerdodson I 929 West Street, Suite 310 Annapolis, MD 21401 Tel 4102680479

More information

Brookwood Homeowners Association, Inc.

Brookwood Homeowners Association, Inc. RESERVE STUDY Full Study Brookwood Homeowners Association, Inc. Published - February 05, 2013 Browning Reserve Group / Emmett, ID 83617 Office (208) 365-0977 Tony@BrowningRG.com / www.browningrg.com Browning

More information

CAPITAL RESERVE STUDY. Ellicott Meadows Condominium Association I. Ellicott City, Maryland

CAPITAL RESERVE STUDY. Ellicott Meadows Condominium Association I. Ellicott City, Maryland CAPITAL RESERVE STUDY FOR THE Ellicott Meadows Condominium Association I Ellicott City, Maryland Contact Name: Victor Brzozowski Date: October 3, 2017 Table of Contents Section Name Section # Executive

More information

Commercial Assessments

Commercial Assessments Commercial Assessments (888) 225-3755 www.commercialassessments.com Funding Reserve Analysis for Timberlake Crossing Condominium Unit Owners Association Hardy, VA January 15, 2013 Page 1 of 24 Pages Funding

More information

SAMPLE. Prepared for: SAMPLE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. Prepared by:

SAMPLE. Prepared for: SAMPLE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. Prepared by: SAMPLE FULL RESERVE STUDY Prepared for: SAMPLE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION Prepared by: CRITERIUM GILES ENGINEERS 7334 CHAPEL HILL ROAD, SUITE 200 RALEIGH, NC 27607 (919) 465-3801 NC LIC. NO. C-2871 CONTENTS

More information

MILL CREEK CONDOMINIUMS RESERVE STUDY

MILL CREEK CONDOMINIUMS RESERVE STUDY MILL CREEK CONDOMINIUMS RESERVE STUDY Fiscal Year 2016 Prepared by: Eric Harker, Assoc. AIA Alliance Project Engineers and Construction Consultants November 6, 2015 Project Number: OR14-017 MILL CREEK

More information

SMA RESERVES. Miramar Plaza Homeowners' Association. Reserve Study For Fiscal Year: 10/01/2014 through 09/30/2015

SMA RESERVES. Miramar Plaza Homeowners' Association. Reserve Study For Fiscal Year: 10/01/2014 through 09/30/2015 SMA RESERVES Miramar Plaza Homeowners' Association Reserve Study Update w/o Visual Inspection July 15, 2014 Reserve Study For Fiscal Year: 10/01/2014 through 09/30/2015 SMA RESERVES 2059 Camden Ave. Suite

More information

Calusa Point Association, Inc. Miami, Florida File #

Calusa Point Association, Inc. Miami, Florida File # A FULL RESERVE STUDY FOR Miami, Florida File # 22920-06289 FOR PERIOD: January 1, 2014 December 31, 2014 PREPARED BY GAB ROBINS, A DIVISION OF CUNNINGHAM LINDSEY 3300 W. LAKE MARY BLVD. SUITE 350 LAKE

More information

2013 Reserve Study. Sea Havens Homeowners Association, Inc Florida Shores Boulevard Daytona Beach Shores, Florida Report No: 2713 Version 2

2013 Reserve Study. Sea Havens Homeowners Association, Inc Florida Shores Boulevard Daytona Beach Shores, Florida Report No: 2713 Version 2 2013 Reserve Study Sea Havens Homeowners Association, Inc Florida Shores Boulevard Daytona Beach Shores, Florida 32118 Report No: 2713 Version 2 For the Period From: January 1, 2013 To: December 31, 2013

More information

FULL RESERVE STUDY Ameri-Cana Resorts Co-op, Inc. Rockledge, Florida April 13, 2017

FULL RESERVE STUDY Ameri-Cana Resorts Co-op, Inc. Rockledge, Florida April 13, 2017 FULL RESERVE STUDY Ameri-Cana Resorts Co-op, Inc. Rockledge, Florida April 13, 2017 This Report contains intellectual property developed by Reserve Advisors, Inc. and cannot be reproduced or distributed

More information

Reserve Analysis Report

Reserve Analysis Report Reserve Analysis Report Parkway Towers 1155 Ash St Denver, CO 80220 Level I Study with Site Inspection Fiscal Year End Date: 12/31/2014 8597 Via Mallorca Suite E La Jolla, CA 92037 Phone: 858-764-1895

More information

DRAFT FOR BOARD REVIEW. Prepared for: SPARGER SPRINGS TOWNHOME OWNER S ASSOCIATION & ALLENTON MANAGEMENT. Prepared by:

DRAFT FOR BOARD REVIEW. Prepared for: SPARGER SPRINGS TOWNHOME OWNER S ASSOCIATION & ALLENTON MANAGEMENT. Prepared by: DRAFT FOR BOARD REVIEW FULL RESERVE STUDY SPARGER SPRINGS TOWNHOMES DURHAM, NC Prepared for: SPARGER SPRINGS TOWNHOME OWNER S ASSOCIATION DURHAM, NC & ALLENTON MANAGEMENT Prepared by: CRITERIUM GILES ENGINEERS

More information

Reserve Analysis Report

Reserve Analysis Report Reserve Analysis Report Sample Condominium Association Laguna Hills, California Version 1 March 31, 2004 23201 Mill Creek Drive, Suite 100 Laguna Hills, California 92653 Phone (949) 474-9800 Facsimile

More information

NEW ALBANY COUNTRY CLUB MASTER ASSOCIATION, INC NEW ALBANY, OHIO

NEW ALBANY COUNTRY CLUB MASTER ASSOCIATION, INC NEW ALBANY, OHIO RESERVE FUND STUDY NEW ALBANY COUNTRY CLUB MASTER ASSOCIATION, INC NEW ALBANY, OHIO Criterium Liszkay Engineers 110 N. High St. Gahanna, OH 43230 614-418-7200 www.clengineers.com NOVEMBER 2013 1.0 INTRODUCTION...1

More information

PROFESSIONAL RESERVE STUDY

PROFESSIONAL RESERVE STUDY PROFESSIONAL RESERVE STUDY LEVEL 3 UPDATE Tamarack Village 10701 to 10798-221 st Lane NE, Redmond, WA 98053 For: Tamrack Village Homeowners Association c/o Tim Ambre, Property Manager econdoservices 1500-112

More information

RESERVE STUDY Component Analysis and Reserve Fund Plan Annual Review Study 2016/17 For Middlefield Meadows HOA Mountain View, CA Prepared By RESERVE ANALYSIS CONSULTING, LLC 1750 Bridgeway, Suite B106

More information

Reserve Fund Study My Condominium Plan

Reserve Fund Study My Condominium Plan Reserve Fund Study My Condominium Plan 12 3456 Number of Units 36 Number of Buildings 1 Building Construction 21 Contact Ima Happy Position(s) President Contact Phone 43.555.4321 Report Date August 8,

More information

CAPE GEORGE COLONY CLUB MARINA RESERVES

CAPE GEORGE COLONY CLUB MARINA RESERVES CAPE GEORGE COLONY CLUB MARINA RESERVES Port Townsend, Washington STANDARD LEVEL 3 RESERVE STUDY UPDATE WITHOUT A SITE VISIT With funding recommendations for the 2019 fiscal year Issued October, 2018 Next

More information

CONTENTS. Sparger Springs Townhomes Durham, NC

CONTENTS. Sparger Springs Townhomes Durham, NC CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 2 3.0 PURPOSE & SCOPE... 3 3.1 PURPOSE... 3 3.2 SCOPE... 3 3.3 SOURCES OF INFORMATION... 4 4.0 DESCRIPTION... 5 5.0 OBSERVATIONS... 6 6.0 RESERVE

More information

Sun Peak Master Association

Sun Peak Master Association Sun Peak Master Association Level 1 Reserve Study Report Period 01/01/2014 12/31/2014 Client Reference Number Property Type Fiscal Year End 17547 Master 12/31 Date of Property Inspection Prepared By Analysis

More information

GLOBAL Solution Partners, LLC - Toll free phone and fax: (844)

GLOBAL Solution Partners, LLC - Toll free phone and fax: (844) GLOBAL Solution Partners, LLC info@globalreservestudies.com - Toll free phone and fax: (844) 477-7883 - www.globalsolutionpartners.com Funding Reserve Analysis for Oak Crest Farms November 2, 2016 Page

More information

RESERVE STUDY UPDATE SUMMARY

RESERVE STUDY UPDATE SUMMARY RESERVE STUDY UPDATE SUMMARY for Fieldstone OWNERS ASSOCIATION Date Prepared: 12/4/2018 for fiscal year 2019 Prepared By: John D. Beatty & Company 8425 Brentwood Blvd., Suite A7 Brentwood, CA 94513 (925)

More information

- RS. D e sig n atio n

- RS. D e sig n atio n ALEXANDER LIU CAI - RS Reserve D e sig n atio n Specialist Sample Table Of HOA Contents Project Table of Contents Page Preface i Executive Summary 1 Membership Disclosure Summary 2 Disclosure Statement

More information

Full Reserve Study For Glenmoor Homeowners Association Conway, South Carolina

Full Reserve Study For Glenmoor Homeowners Association Conway, South Carolina Full Reserve Study For Glenmoor Homeowners Association Conway, South Carolina Prepared for FY 2016 Report Date: November 27, 2015 Southeast Region 10459 Hunters Creek Court Jacksonville, FL 32256 (904)

More information

SCT RESERVE CONSULTANTS, INC. P.O. BOX TEMECULA, CA

SCT RESERVE CONSULTANTS, INC. P.O. BOX TEMECULA, CA SCT RESERVE CONSULTANTS, INC. P.O. BOX 890129 TEMECULA, CA 92589-0129 PHONE (951) 296-3520 FAX (951) 296-5038 E-MAIL mike.g@sctreserve.com March 24, 2015 Job 2000-003-10 L3 St. Tropez Villas I, Incorporated

More information

PROFESSIONAL RESERVE STUDY

PROFESSIONAL RESERVE STUDY PROFESSIONAL RESERVE STUDY Cambridge Court 9512-1 st Avenue Northeast, Seattle, WA 98115 For: Cambridge Court Homeowners Association c/o Tim Kammer, Property Manager Condo Managements, Inc. 1661 Harbor

More information

PROFESSIONAL RESERVE STUDY

PROFESSIONAL RESERVE STUDY PROFESSIONAL RESERVE STUDY Tamarack Village 10701 to 10798-221 st Lane NE, Redmond, WA 98053 For: Tamrack Village Homeowners Association c/o Jason Kozleski Board President 10790-221 st Lane NE Redmond,

More information

Prepared for: VILLAGE AT HIGHLANDS OWNERS ASSOCIATION CROZET, VA. Prepared by:

Prepared for: VILLAGE AT HIGHLANDS OWNERS ASSOCIATION CROZET, VA. Prepared by: RESERVE FUND STUDY THE VILLAGE AT HIGHLANDS CROZET, VA 22932 Prepared for: VILLAGE AT HIGHLANDS OWNERS ASSOCIATION CROZET, VA C/O ASSOCIA COMMUNITY GROUP 1828 PAVILION CIRCLE CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911

More information

Parkwood HOA. Level 1 Reserve Study. Report Period 1/1/ /31/2012. Date of Property Inspection. Report prepared on Saturday, August 11, 2012

Parkwood HOA. Level 1 Reserve Study. Report Period 1/1/ /31/2012. Date of Property Inspection. Report prepared on Saturday, August 11, 2012 Parkwood HOA Level 1 Reserve Study Report Period 1/1/2012 12/31/2012 Client Reference Number Property Type Number of Units Fiscal Year End 12784 Townhouse 8 12/31 Date of Property Inspection Prepared By

More information

LEVEL 3 RESERVE STUDY UPDATE WOOLSEY CORNER CONDOMINIUM

LEVEL 3 RESERVE STUDY UPDATE WOOLSEY CORNER CONDOMINIUM LEVEL 3 RESERVE STUDY UPDATE FOR WOOLSEY CORNER CONDOMINIUM Portland, OR January 1, 2014 December 31, 2014 Prepared By: Carson M. Horton, RS Quality Check By: L. Law Broili Date: January 1, 2014 Copyright

More information

RESERVE STUDY ANNUAL REPORT

RESERVE STUDY ANNUAL REPORT RESERVE STUDY ANNUAL REPORT PINELOCH SUN BEACH CLUB LEVEL III RESERVE STUDY UPDATE WITHOUT SITE VISIT Ronald, WA 98940 Report #50510500R FINANCIAL YEAR 01.2016 12.2016 701 Fifth Ave, Suite 4200, Seattle

More information

Shadow Ridge. Level 2 Reserve Study. Report Period 01/01/ /31/2015. Date of Property Inspection 8/21/2014

Shadow Ridge. Level 2 Reserve Study. Report Period 01/01/ /31/2015. Date of Property Inspection 8/21/2014 Shadow Ridge Level 2 Reserve Study Report Period 01/01/2015 12/31/2015 Client Reference Number 10160 Property Type Condominium Number of Units 168 Fiscal Year End 12/31 Date of Property Inspection 8/21/2014

More information

CAPITAL RESERVE STUDY

CAPITAL RESERVE STUDY Arizona Texas Nevada Utah New Mexico CAPITAL RESERVE STUDY Prepared for: Quail Creek HOA Date of Report: 6/7/2018 Capital Reserve Analysts Bringing the future into the present Capital Reserve Analysts,

More information

CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1

CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 2 3.0 PURPOSE & SCOPE... 3 3.1 PURPOSE... 3 3.2 SCOPE... 3 3.3 SOURCES OF INFORMATION... 4 4.0 DESCRIPTION... 5 5.0 OBSERVATIONS... 6 6.0 RESERVE

More information

Sample Reserve Study Your City, Your State Account Sample Reserve Study -- Version 7.0 (2003) February 01, 2003

Sample Reserve Study Your City, Your State Account Sample Reserve Study -- Version 7.0 (2003) February 01, 2003 Your City, Your State Account Sample Reserve Study -- Version 7.0 (2003) February 01, 2003 Reserve Analyst P.O. Box 797 Vernon, AZ 85940 Phone: 800-561-0173 Fax: 928-537-3377 Prepared By Quality Check

More information

PROFESSIONAL RESERVE STUDY

PROFESSIONAL RESERVE STUDY PROFESSIONAL RESERVE STUDY Licorice Fern II Homeowners Association 16880 SE Licorice Way, Renton, WA 98059 For: Licorice Fern II Homeowners Association c/o Ann Hart, Property Manager Pinnacle 2801 Alaskan

More information

Update With Site-Visit Reserve Study

Update With Site-Visit Reserve Study Washington Office Corporate Office 505 South 336 th St., Ste 620 Calabasas, CA Federal Way, WA 98003 Regional Offices TEL 253/661-5437 Phoenix, AZ FAX 253/661-5430 San Francisco, CA arwa@reservestudy.com

More information

Full Reserve Study. Nelson Farms HOA. Fort Collins, CO. Report #: For Period Beginning: May 1, 2016 Expires: April 30, 2017

Full Reserve Study. Nelson Farms HOA. Fort Collins, CO. Report #: For Period Beginning: May 1, 2016 Expires: April 30, 2017 Full Reserve Study Nelson Farms HOA Fort Collins, CO Report #: 19185-0 For Period Beginning: May 1, 2016 Expires: April 30, 2017 Date Revised: January 13, 2016 Hello, and welcome to your Reserve Study!

More information

Reserve Study Project No Prepared for Nelson Farm Homeowner Association 1771 Norwood Lane Fort Collins, Colorado

Reserve Study Project No Prepared for Nelson Farm Homeowner Association 1771 Norwood Lane Fort Collins, Colorado Reserve Study Project No. 09069 Prepared for 1771 Norwood Lane Fort Collins, Colorado Prepared by Bornengineering 1130 West 124 th Avenue, Suite 100 Westminster, Colorado 80234 January 28, 2010 1130 WEST

More information

Do-It-Yourself Reserve Study

Do-It-Yourself Reserve Study Washington Office Corporate Office 505 South 336 th St., Ste 620 Calabasas, CA Federal Way, WA 98003 Regional Offices TEL 253/661-5437 Phoenix, AZ FAX 253/661-5430 San Francisco, CA arwa@reservestudy.com

More information

GLOBAL Solution Partners, LLC - Toll free phone and fax: (844)

GLOBAL Solution Partners, LLC - Toll free phone and fax: (844) GLOBAL Solution Partners, LLC info@globalreservestudies.com - Toll free phone and fax: (844) 477-7883 - www.globalsolutionpartners.com Funding Reserve Analysis for The Bluffs at Ashley River August 2,

More information

Reserve Analysis Report

Reserve Analysis Report Reserve Analysis Report Soda Creek Condominiums Dillon, Colorado Version 2 Monday, August 19, 2013 6860 S. Yosemite Court, Suite 2000 Centennial, CO 80112 Phone (303) 953-2078 Facsimile (303) 953-2157

More information

LEVEL 3 RESERVE STUDY UPDATE WOOLSEY CORNER CONDOMINIUM

LEVEL 3 RESERVE STUDY UPDATE WOOLSEY CORNER CONDOMINIUM LEVEL 3 RESERVE STUDY UPDATE FOR WOOLSEY CORNER CONDOMINIUM Portland, OR January 1, 2017 December 31, 2017 Prepared By: Carson M. Horton, RS Quality Check By: L. Law Broili Date: April 6, 2017 Copyright

More information

Fieldstone RESERVE STUDY UPDATE. John D. Beatty & Company OWNERS ASSOCIATION. for. Date Prepared: 12/4/2018 for fiscal year 2019.

Fieldstone RESERVE STUDY UPDATE. John D. Beatty & Company OWNERS ASSOCIATION. for. Date Prepared: 12/4/2018 for fiscal year 2019. RESERVE STUDY UPDATE for Fieldstone OWNERS ASSOCIATION Date Prepared: 12/4/2018 for fiscal year 2019 Prepared By: John D. Beatty & Company 8425 Brentwood Blvd., Suite A7 Brentwood, CA 94513 (925) 831-1803

More information

CONTENTS. Greens at Lochmere Cary, NC

CONTENTS. Greens at Lochmere Cary, NC CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 2 3.0 PURPOSE & SCOPE... 3 3.1 PURPOSE... 3 3.2 SCOPE... 3 3.3 SOURCES OF INFORMATION... 4 4.0 DESCRIPTION... 6 5.0 OBSERVATIONS... 6 6.0 RESERVE

More information

Bridgewood Manor HOA

Bridgewood Manor HOA Bridgewood Manor HOA Level 1 Reserve Study Report Period 01/01/2015 12/31/2015 Client Reference Number 18076 Property Type Condominium Number of Units 40 Fiscal Year End 12/31 Date of Property Inspection

More information

Level 3 Reserve Study without a Site a Site Visit Visit

Level 3 Reserve Study without a Site a Site Visit Visit Level 3 Reserve Study without a Site a Site Visit Visit We offer two types of reports for a Level 3 Reserve Study with a Site Visit, RS-3 - Standard Reserve Study without a site visit SMRS-3 - Statutory

More information

Ashleigh Commons Condominiums Association, Inc.

Ashleigh Commons Condominiums Association, Inc. RESERVE STUDY Full Study Ashleigh Commons Condominiums Association, Inc. Published - January 14, 2016 Browning Reserve Group / Emmett, ID 83617 Office (208) 365-0977 Tony@BrowningRG.com / www.browningrg.com

More information

SCT RESERVE CONSULTANTS, INC. P.O. BOX TEMECULA, CA

SCT RESERVE CONSULTANTS, INC. P.O. BOX TEMECULA, CA SCT RESERVE CONSULTANTS, INC. P.O. BOX 890129 TEMECULA, CA 92589-0129 PHONE (951) 296-3520 FAX (951) 296-5038 E-MAIL mike.g@sctreserve.com November 23, 2017 Job 2006-127-12 L3 Sunshine Villas Homeowners

More information

DRAFT WILLOUGHBY PARK GREENVILLE, NC. Prepared for: WILLOUGHBY PARK CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION & HOA MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC.

DRAFT WILLOUGHBY PARK GREENVILLE, NC. Prepared for: WILLOUGHBY PARK CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION & HOA MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC. DRAFT FULL RESERVE STUDY WILLOUGHBY PARK GREENVILLE, NC Prepared for: WILLOUGHBY PARK CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION GREENVILLE, NC & HOA MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC Prepared by: CRITERIUM GILES ENGINEERS, INC. 1150

More information

Clearbrook HOA. Level 1 Reserve Study. Report Period 1/1/ /31/2010. Client Reference Number /23/2010 Prepared By

Clearbrook HOA. Level 1 Reserve Study. Report Period 1/1/ /31/2010. Client Reference Number /23/2010 Prepared By Clearbrook HOA Level 1 Reserve Study Report Period 1/1/2010 12/31/2010 Client Reference Number 11775 Property Type Apartment Style Number of Units 21 Fiscal Year End 12/31 Date of Property Inspection 3/23/2010

More information

FULL RESERVE STUDY Stillwood Cluster Lot Owners' Association, Inc. Stow, Ohio August 15, 2017

FULL RESERVE STUDY Stillwood Cluster Lot Owners' Association, Inc. Stow, Ohio August 15, 2017 FULL RESERVE STUDY Stillwood Cluster Lot Owners' Association, Inc. Stow, Ohio August 15, 2017 This Report contains intellectual property developed by Reserve Advisors, Inc. and cannot be reproduced or

More information

PROFESSIONAL RESERVE STUDY

PROFESSIONAL RESERVE STUDY PROFESSIONAL RESERVE STUDY Heritage Park 3208-52 nd Place NE, Tacoma, WA 98422 For: Heritage Park Homeowners Association c/o Juanita Carbaugh, Property Manager HOA Community Solutions 5500 Olympic Drive,

More information

Initial Capital Reserve Funding Information provided by the Association and agreed Forecasting Assumptions

Initial Capital Reserve Funding Information provided by the Association and agreed Forecasting Assumptions Initial Capital Reserve Funding Information provided by the Association and agreed Forecasting Assumptions 1 Organization: Highlands Condominium Association 2 Address: Spokane, WA 3 Number of Units 46

More information

Revised FULL RESERVE STUDY. Falcon Ridge at Highland Creek Homeowners Association, Inc.

Revised FULL RESERVE STUDY. Falcon Ridge at Highland Creek Homeowners Association, Inc. Revised FULL RESERVE STUDY Falcon Ridge at Highland Creek Homeowners Association, Inc. Charlotte, North Carolina Inspected - February 20, 2018 Revised - August 6, 2018 This Report contains intellectual

More information

PROFESSIONAL RESERVE STUDY

PROFESSIONAL RESERVE STUDY PROFESSIONAL RESERVE STUDY Tamarack Village 10701 to 10798-221 st Lane NE, Redmond, WA 98053 For: Tamrack Village Homeowners Association c/o Tim Ambre, Property Manager econdoservices 1500-112 th Ave NE

More information

SOMERSET VILLAGE DRAFT HOA RESERVE STUDY. Beginning Period: January 1, 2011 Ending: December 31, Prepared By:

SOMERSET VILLAGE DRAFT HOA RESERVE STUDY. Beginning Period: January 1, 2011 Ending: December 31, Prepared By: SOMERSET VILLAGE HOA RESERVE STUDY Beginning Period: January 1, 2011 Ending: December 31, 2011 Prepared By: Report Number: 10-003 Site Inspection Date: September 14, 2010 Report Submittal Date: October

More information

Central Pointe HOA. Level I Reserve Study. Report Period 1/01/08 12/31/08

Central Pointe HOA. Level I Reserve Study. Report Period 1/01/08 12/31/08 Central Pointe HOA Level I Reserve Study Report Period 1/01/08 12/31/08 Client Reference Number.... 10870 Property Type...... Mid-Rise Number of Units............ 83 Fiscal Year End....... December 31

More information

ASHLAND COCKEYSVILLE, MD Prepared for: WPM REAL ESTATE GROUP, LLC AND ASHLAND HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. Prepared by:

ASHLAND COCKEYSVILLE, MD Prepared for: WPM REAL ESTATE GROUP, LLC AND ASHLAND HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. Prepared by: RESERVE FUND STUDY ASHLAND COCKEYSVILLE, MD 21030 Prepared for: WPM REAL ESTATE GROUP, LLC AND ASHLAND HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION Prepared by: CRITERIUM-HARBOR ENGINEERS PO BOX 408 STEVENSON, MARYLAND 21153

More information

FULL RESERVE STUDY. Home Owners Association for Seale Subdivision Unit-1, Inc. San Antonio, Texas November 17, 2017

FULL RESERVE STUDY. Home Owners Association for Seale Subdivision Unit-1, Inc. San Antonio, Texas November 17, 2017 FULL RESERVE STUDY Home Owners Association for Seale Subdivision Unit-1, Inc. San Antonio, Texas November 17, 2017 This Report contains intellectual property developed by Reserve Advisors, Inc. and cannot

More information

.USI.COMMERCIAL. The Summerlyn Association of Owners Inc. Lewes, Delaware. Funding Reserve Analysis. for. September 3, 2014

.USI.COMMERCIAL. The Summerlyn Association of Owners Inc. Lewes, Delaware. Funding Reserve Analysis. for. September 3, 2014 .USI.COMMERCIAL (888)225-3755 www.usicommercial.com Funding Reserve Analysis for The Summerlyn Association of Owners Inc. Lewes, Delaware September 3, 2014 Page 1 of 25 Pages Funding Reserve Analysis for

More information

CONTENTS. Twisted Creek Townhomes Holly Springs, NC

CONTENTS. Twisted Creek Townhomes Holly Springs, NC CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 2 3.0 PURPOSE & SCOPE... 3 3.1 PURPOSE... 3 3.2 SCOPE... 3 3.3 SOURCES OF INFORMATION... 4 4.0 DESCRIPTION... 5 5.0 OBSERVATIONS... 6 6.0 RESERVE

More information