Mid-Term-Evaluation on behalf of WHH Country Office Afghanistan

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Mid-Term-Evaluation on behalf of WHH Country Office Afghanistan"

Transcription

1 Mid-Term-Evaluation on behalf of WHH Country Office Afghanistan 1 Introduction Country: Afghanistan Project title: Strengthening Food Security and Natural Resource Management in Jawzjan province in Northern-Afghanistan" Project No.: AFG-1177 Project holder: Welthungerhilfe Approved budget: Deutsche Welthungerhilfe e.v. Committed funds: 2.5 Mio EUR Co-financer (line): German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ Private Agencies) Project period: Welthungerhilfe (WHH), formerly known German Agro Action (GAA),Is a German based, non-profit making, non-aligned international NGO that aspires to see a world without hunger and poverty. Welthungerhilfe's activities in Afghanistan began back in immediately after the former Soviet Union's occupation - to provide emergency aid for refugees. In 1992, Welthungerhilfe further increased their emergency aid activities and services, as well as rehabilitation and reconstruction assistance. Currently, WHH s draws most of its funding from the German government as well as from donations of the German public with the aim to reduce the level of poverty while improving the livelihoods for the most vulnerable population. Since Dec 2015, North Regional Office of Welthungerhilfe Afghanistan in Jawzjan - in partnership with one local NGO (PRB Partners Revitalization and Building) has been implementing a project for food insecure people in three districts (Sheberghan, Khanaqa and Aqcha) of Jawzjan province. The project main objective is to improve the food and nutrition security in the three districts of Jawzjan. In particular the population of the three districts of Jawzjan is to be supported to regain and improve their livelihoods through activities in the area of agriculture and livestock breeding, internal production of food as well as restoration of and better handling of natural resources. Project Overall Objective (Impact): The food and nutrition security in the three districts of Jawzjan has improved. Project objective (Outcome): The population of the three districts of Jawzjan was able to restore and improve its livelihood. Project Outputs / Expected Results: 1- Farmers can improve their productivity, their diversity and their land management. (Availability, access and stability).

2 Target Indicators: a) By the project end, 40% of the 800 target farmers increase their productivity by at least 20% and cultivate more different plants (exact value placement takes place after the baseline study). b) By the project end, at least 15% more land is irrigated for production purposes than the current land area recorded in the baseline study. c) In the year after the PTD (participatory technology development), 50% of the 800 target farmers use techniques for increased diversity and productivity. (Behavioural change /economic status can hinder). d) By the project end, at least 60% of the 800 beneficiary farmers have introduced measures to protect soil and water, such as drip irrigation, erosion protection measures, dry crops. e) By the project end, 18 farmers (of 24 beneficiaries from the 4 pilot units) achieve at least a 20% higher income from the processing and marketing of selected marketable products. 2- Livestock owners can improve the productivity of livestock (availability and access). Target Indicators: a) By the project end, at least 50% of the 1,200 beneficiaries adopt improved management practices and receive better advisory services. b) In the year after the implementation of the FFS, 50% of the 1200 FFS graduates apply improved (including environmentally friendly) practices in livestock farming. c) By the project end, the livestock owners have restored a total of two hectares of private pastureland. d) By the project end, local veterinary assistants deliver services to 600 or 50% of the trained livestock owners. e) By the project end, 1,200 (800 male and 400 female) livestock owners have access to medicine and vaccines. f) By the project end, at least 8 monitoring reports and at least 8 financial and narrative reports have been submitted by the implementation partner all of them in accordance with international standards, accurate and in time. 3- Women (of child-bearing age) can ensure better health and nutrition in the household (use and utilisation). Target Indicators: a) By the project end, at least 40% of the 432 beneficiary households (HH = 7 members, according to UN) show a generally better nutritional diversity (use of more than 4 food groups), "improved food consumption score" based on the results of the baseline study. b) In the year after the training, at least 60% of the 432 beneficiary households continue to care for their kitchen gardens. c) In the year after the training, at least 30% of the 432 beneficiary households use SLM methods (mulching, composting, collecting of rainwater). d) In the year after the training, 40% of the 432 target households continue to use at least one food preservation method. e) At the end of each training course cycle, at least 90% of the 432 women know about nutrition at infant age and in early childhood and 60% apply this knowledge. f) At the end of the project, the hygiene in at least 60% of the addressed 432 households has improved (handwashing with soap, water storage, use of toilets). 2

3 4- Communal facilities and local authorities can better manage and administer the natural resources together (stability). Target Indicators: a) At least 24 functioning NRMCs, at least 30 teachers and students (male and female) of the Institute for Agriculture and Livestock, as well as ten members of the DAIL and DRRD have improved capacities and can better manage and administer the natural resources. b) By the project end, 24 NRMCs have administrative plans and processes (including financial plans/processes), in order to improve the usage and ownership structures of restored natural resources. c) By the end of the first year of the implementation, 24 villages create an inventory of their natural resources and multiple-year natural resources plans. d) By the end of the first year of the implementation, 24 villages create an inventory of their natural resources and multiple-year natural resources plans. e) By the project end, 24 villages produce management plans (including financial plans, if necessary), in order to preserve the restored natural goods. f) By the project end, 24 villages, civil society organisations and local authorities understand the community-based NRM and their roles in regard to the NRM. g) 24 NRMCs and CDCs present their management plans to the responsible ministries, which link the NRM projects with management structures at a higher level. h) Ten members of the DAIL and DRRD as well as at least 30 teachers and students (male and female) of the Institute for Agriculture and Livestock Breeding have participated together in four (theoretical and practical) training course meetings about the handling of natural resources and the knowledge increase, such as the linking of science and management, leads to a better understanding and appropriate national planning. Project Partner: The activities under result2 (livestock management) are being implemented in partnership with Partners Revitalization and Building (PRB) in three districts of Jawzjan province, and Welthungerhilfe is responsible for implementation of three other results which are being implemented in the same mentioned area. Objective of the Mid-Term Evaluation: The project holder would like to conduct a mid-term evaluation of the full project. The results will be used by the project holder to improve the work during the remaining half of the project and, pending on observations and recommendations, possibly also guide on whether replanning or planning adjustments have to be made for the remaining time of the project. The evaluation results will be shared with the donor. 2 Task description The main tasks for the evaluation team are drafted below. The suggested structure of the report is attached as an annex. 2.1 Questions of specific interest for Welthungerhilfe and its partners The objective of this Mid-Term evaluation is to provide a comprehensive assessment of the project and an opportunity to critically assess administrative and technical strategies and issues. The evaluation gives recommendations to improve the potential of the Project to achieve expected outcomes and objectives within the project timeframe. 3

4 The evaluation aims to determine: 1. To analyse the design of the project; and evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the projects implementation by WHH and partner (PRB) within the agreed contractual conditions, time- frame, work-plan, log frame, and budget. 2. To analyse the level of coordination and cooperation between WHH, and its partner (PRB) and find out the gaps, shortcoming, weaknesses and strength points. 3. To analyze that how the intervention improved food security of target groups in the targeted area so far. 4. To identify and record lesson learn, best practices, strengths and provide recommendations for improvement. 2.2 Criteria for the assessment of the project/ Questions of special interest For assessment of the project, the evaluation team uses the OECD/DAC criteria of relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, impact and sustainability (see annex 4). In addition to the OECD/DAC criteria, the evaluator or team should analyse any other pertinent issues that need addressing or which may or should influence future project direction. Based on the observations and findings, the evaluator should come up with clear recommendations for the remaining time of the project. Relevance: To what extent is the project suited to: o Is the Project addressing the right target group in the targeted area and likewise, is the project meet the priorities and needs of target group in the intervention area? o Are the Welthungerhilfe relevant standards, procedures and donor priorities considered? o Are the activities and outputs of the project consistent with the project primary goal and the attainment of the objectives? o Are the activities and output of the project consistent with the intended impacts and effects? Effectiveness: To what extent has the project achieved it s below stated purpose? o Farmers have improved access to irrigation water and enhanced their skills in agricultural production techniques, to what extent the intervention increased/will be increased their production and productivity and improved their livelihood. o Livestock holders and women have improved their skills through livestock management and kitchen gardening, to what extent the skills applied/will be applied in their daily life/livelihood. o To what extent the project helped/will help the target groups food & nutrition security and their livelihood extension. o Is the project improved the natural resource management in the area of intervention, to what extent the community NRM plans coordinated with line departments, and to what extent the community NRM plans integrated into provincial annual plan. o Are the project results (outputs) achieved/will be achieved in term of quantity and quality, and to what extent the project outcome achieved/will be achieved? o To what extend the accountability and transparency considered in the project. o What were the major factors influencing the achievement or non-achievement of the objectives? Efficiency: o o o How cost efficient were the project activities? Were the project objectives detailed above achieved/will be achieved on time? Was the project implemented in the most efficient way? 4

5 Impact: What are the positive and negative changes produced by the project, directly or indirectly, intended or unintended? o o What outcome (positive, negative) can be observed and what impacts expected? What recommendations for the future programme can be made on the basis of the lessons learnt and good practices in all part of the project, particularly on strengthening partnership? Sustainability: Assessment on whether the project will be environmentally as well as financially sustainable? Whether the benefits of the project activities are likely to continue after donor funding has been withdrawn. o o To what extent are the benefits of the project expected to continue once the donor funding has ceased? What are the major factors, which have so far influenced the achievement or non-achievement of sustainability of the programme or project 2.3 Description of context and project With regard to questions and criteria the evaluation team describes the following: context, status quo of the relevant professional discourse, important actors, the project, experiences of similar projects on the country or international level. This chapter provides information for the analysis in the chapter relevance. 2.4 Evaluation design and methodology As part of the assignment, the successful evaluator will apply a mixture of different methodologies, including primary data collection and review of existing resources: a) A desk review of all project-related documents, reports (narrative, financial and monitoring reports), review of proposal and budget and contract with donor and between WHH and its two implementing partners, b) Field data collection on a sample of outcomes (selection to be discussed by the evaluator with the project team) to verify data collected to date, c) Structured interview with direct & indirect beneficiaries with consideration of sufficient sample size. (Quantitative approach), d) Focus group discussions with beneficiaries including girls, boys, men and women, parents, and teachers, e) Key informants interview with community representative, relevant government officials and key staff. (Quantitative & Qualitative approach). As part of the assignment, the evaluator will provide a detailed planning on proposed methodologies. WHH will review the planned methodologies proposed by the evaluator and provide feedback before the evaluation process begins. We would also like the evaluator to suggest any particularly innovative or interesting methodologies they may employ. A critical assessment and discussion of the project s strengths and challenges is welcome. Welthungerhilfe is ready to learn from mistakes. The study design should follow international standards concerning accuracy and reliability of data. 2.5 Reporting and documentation a) Minutes of the kick-off meeting (a lighter form of an inception report), documenting decisions, specifications, agreed dates for field visits, reporting etc. emerging from the meeting. b) Debriefing paper, at the end of the field mission that outlines the most important findings of the evaluation, 1-2 pages 5

6 c) Evaluation report, at the latest four weeks after the field mission, pages maximum, plus annexes. d) Draft management response; integration of the recommendations into Welthungerhilfe s management response form, together with the final version of the evaluation report. Details of the reports and documentations are included as annex 1. 3 Timetable and phases of the evaluation Evaluation to begin in first half of August 2017 (time-frame to be discussed with evaluator), and work in the field to be undertaken around an approximately 28 days timeline with the final report to be submitted by September 15, 2017 at the latest. 4 Profile of the evaluation team The evaluator should meet the following criteria: a) An advanced degree or equivalent experience in Agriculture, Natural resource management and/or relevant academic field. b) At least 5 years of experience working on and evaluating livelihood, food & nutrition security, and natural resource management projects. c) Knowledge of livelihood, Food security/natural resource management sectors in Afghanistan. d) Knowledge of partnership models and assessing their effectiveness, especially in a North-South relationship e) Clear, effective writer in English f) Experience of working with participatory methodologies 5 Quality Check of the evaluation report Welthungerhilfe will check the quality of the evaluation report. The applied grid is documented as an annex. 6 Proposal content, Deadline and Place of Submission: Consulting firms or individual freelancing evaluator that fulfill the requirement shall submit as PDF: a) Application letter, signed by lead applicant; b) Financial and technical proposal with schedule; c) Detailed CV of the consulting team; d) References Please note that applications in other format than PDF and applications with an application letter lacking a signature will not be considered. These should be submitted to afg.kab.hr@welthungerhilfe.de by 5pm July 5, The technical proposal for the content of the evaluation must at least contain: a) Methodology: detail of the following should be presented - Type of study design - Sampling technique - Data collection technique - Methods of data compilation, analyzing and interpreting b) Understanding of the TOR c) Organizational experience and capacity to undertake the assignment d) The physical input (e.g. computer, printer, fax, telephone and internet access) which would be used by the team of consultant 6

7 e) Work schedule f) Composition of the whole evaluation team including data collectors and supervisors Financial part The offer should contain the costs of personnel (lead and assistant consultant, enumerators, supervisors, etc) and inputs (stationary, photocopying, etc). Costs for unforeseen expenses should not be included in the calculation. When preparing budget, the following to be considered; Soft and hard copies of relevant documents will be provided by WHH Transportation will be provided by WHH WHH staff will facilitate community entry Laptop to be provided by the evaluator Preferred budget structure: Item Total Cost (AFN / USD) Evaluator s Fee: XX XX AFN / USD Total = XXXX USD/AFN Other costs (please specify) Total 7 Proposal evaluation The evaluation will be done in two stages. During the first stage, the technical part of the proposal will be evaluated and rated. The technical part and the financial part will get 60% and 40% of the evaluation. 8 Termination If the Client finds that the CONSULTANT is not discharging its duties according to this terms of reference; it may at any time unilaterally terminate the contract and holds the consultants liable for all damages, financial and otherwise including advance payments. 9 Reimbursement and support for proposal preparation: The cost of preparation of the financial and technical proposals is neither reimbursable nor can be considered as a direct cost of the project. Annexes Annex 1: Structure of reports and documents Annex 2: Management Response to Project Evaluation Annex 3: Quality check of the evaluation report (Welthungerhilfe) Annex 4: Information about DAC Criteria 7

8 Annex 1: Final Report Outline Table of contents List of abbreviations and acronyms Lists of tables, illustrations, boxes, etc. Acknowledgement and disclaimer I. Summary 1 Brief description of the project and framework conditions 2 Relevance 3 Effectiveness 4 Efficiency 5 Outcomes and impacts 6 Sustainability 7 Most important recommendations 8 General conclusions and lessons learnt II. Main text 0 Prior remarks 0.1 Reason and aim of the evaluation 0.2 Evaluation process 0.3 Evaluation methods 1 Description of the project 1.1 Brief project description 1.2 Framework conditions 1.3 Brief description of the target group 2 Relevance 2.1 Relevance to core problems of the target group 2.2 Relevance to the objectives of Welthungerhilfe 2.3 Relevance to the objectives of the partner organisation and the partner country 3 Effectiveness 3.1 Achievement of project purpose 3.2. Project preparation Quality of target group, actor and situational analyses Extent self-help approaches and structures are taken into account 3.3 Project planning Quality of the project planning matrix Analysis of the results chain Realism of project purpose Appropriateness of staff, material and financial planning 3.4 Quality of the analysis of project holder (partner(s) or external structure of the Welthungerhilfe) Organisational structure and focal points of work Staff, equipment and logistics Project steering and financial administration 3.5 Steering by the head office, regional office and cooperation with the project holder 3.6 Quality of the project execution Presentation and evaluation of the project outputs and activities Involvement of the target group and project cooperations 8

9 3.6.3 Overall evaluation of the execution Occurrence of assumptions and risks 4 Efficiency 4.1 Observation on cost/benefit ratio for the overall project 4.2 Observation on cost/performance ratio for the individual measures (if possible) 4.3 Quality of the internal project M&E system 4.4 Other aspects 5. Direct and indirect, short, medium and long-term outcomes and impacts 5.1 Use of Outputs / Outcomes Economic outcomes Socio-cultural outcomes Organisational and institutional/political outcomes Environmental outcomes 5.2. Impacts Economic impacts (if possible) Socio-cultural impacts Organisational and institutional/political impacts Environmental impacts (if possible) 6 Sustainability 6.1 Economic-financial (if possible) 6.2 Socio-cultural 6.3 Organisational and institutional/political 6.4 Environmental (if possible) 6.5 Other aspects 7 Conclusions and recommendations 7.1 Project specific conclusions 7.2 Recommendations 8 General conclusions 8.1 Important lessons learnt 8.2 Positive examples from the project (good practice) Annexes Terms of reference Project planning matrix Travel and work schedule References,sources (resource persons, documents, surveys, etc.) Case Studies, special narrative, Minutes of the final on-site meeting, de-briefing, de-briefing workshop Maps Pictures, photographs and comments, explanations Others. 9

10 Annex 2 Management Response to Project Evaluation Project Name: Time evaluation was conducted: Response form filled in by: Project Number: Evaluator: Date of response: Evaluator: Please insert recommendations mentioned in the report into below section with green headings and if appropriate, suggest a timeframe. Country/ Project Office: This document serves as a working document for you to follow up on recommendations. Please fill in the fields with column headings in grey and send back a copy to MELA unit at headquarter 3-6 months after the evaluation. No Recommendation Directed To Partne r/ Organi sation WHH proje ct offic e WHH country office/ HQ Bonn Priorit y/ Timefr ame Recommend ation already implemente d? How? When was/ will the recommendation be implemented? Responsible person/ unit? The recommendatio n will not be implemented, because [Reference to chapter/ topic/ DAC criterion] [Reference to chapter/ topic/ DAC criterion] 10

11 Accuracy Utility Project information Annex 3: Quality Check of the evaluation report (Welthungerhilfe) Assessment by, date: No Criteria Categories Information / Assessment 1 Project title 2 Project No. 3 Co-financer 4 Project holder / partners 5 Local consultant 6 Cost (review and project) 7 ToR respected? a) fully b) mostly c) less than 50% 8 Quality of reporting (principal is clear; executive summary provides clear insides of the results, language is good etc.) 9 Methods of data collection / evaluation methods Quality of proceeding 10 (proceeding is transparent and comprehensible; facts, analysis, conclusions and recommendations are distinguished) 11 Technical terms are used correctly (DAC criteria, results chain, output, outcomes etc.) 12 Participation of target groups in the process of the review; 13 gender is considered in data collection and analysis deviations explained? a) very good/ good b) okay / acceptable c) rather poor a) review of documents b) interviews c) questionnaire d) group discussions e) other: Things that are countable are counted; things which are measurable are measured 1 : a) very good/ good b) okay / acceptable c) rather poor a) very good/ good b) okay / acceptable c) rather poor a) very good/ good b) okay / acceptable c) rather poor a) rather high b) okay / normal c) rather low a) rather high b) okay /normal c) rather low 1 For important aspects the consultant provides details in the sense of: 2 out of 10 partner organizations (interviewed) stressed that they want to focus on irrigation in Instead of: Some partner organizations stressed that 11

12 Fairness/ Utility 14 Important issues or/and strength & weaknesses are discussed. a) rather high b) okay / normal c) rather low 15 Conclusion: Quality of the report 16 Further remarks; interesting issues. a) very good/ good b) okay / acceptable c) rather poor 12

13 Annex 4: Information about DAC Criteria Source, 12 June 2015: ; DAC Criteria for Evaluating Development Assistance When evaluating programmes and projects it is useful to consider the following criteria. Relevance The extent to which the aid activity is suited to the priorities and policies of the target group, recipient and donor. In evaluating the relevance of a programme or a project, it is useful to consider the following questions: To what extent are the objectives of the programme still valid? Are the activities and outputs of the programme consistent with the overall goal and the attainment of its objectives? Are the activities and outputs of the programme consistent with the intended impacts and effects? Effectiveness A measure of the extent to which an aid activity attains its objectives. In evaluating the effectiveness of a programme or a project, it is useful to consider the following questions: To what extent were the objectives achieved / are likely to be achieved? What were the major factors influencing the achievement or non-achievement of the objectives? Efficiency Efficiency measures the outputs -- qualitative and quantitative -- in relation to the inputs. It is an economic term which signifies that the aid uses the least costly resources possible in order to achieve the desired results. This generally requires comparing alternative approaches to achieving the same outputs, to see whether the most efficient process has been adopted. When evaluating the efficiency of a programme or a project, it is useful to consider the following questions: Were activities cost-efficient? Were objectives achieved on time? Was the programme or project implemented in the most efficient way compared to alternatives? 13

14 Impact The positive and negative changes produced by a development intervention, directly or indirectly, intended or unintended. This involves the main impacts and effects resulting from the activity on the local social, economic, environmental and other development indicators. The examination should be concerned with both intended and unintended results and must also include the positive and negative impact of external factors, such as changes in terms of trade and financial conditions. When evaluating the impact of a programme or a project, it is useful to consider the following questions: What has happened as a result of the programme or project? What real difference has the activity made to the beneficiaries? How many people have been affected? Sustainability Sustainability is concerned with measuring whether the benefits of an activity are likely to continue after donor funding has been withdrawn. Projects need to be environmentally as well as financially sustainable. When evaluating the sustainability of a programme or a project, it is useful to consider the following questions: To what extent did the benefits of a programme or project continue after donor funding ceased? What were the major factors which influenced the achievement or non-achievement of sustainability of the programme or project? 14

Terms of Reference. External monitoring mission for the Project Mid-Term Review

Terms of Reference. External monitoring mission for the Project Mid-Term Review I- BACKGROUND Project: Supporting Citizens Access to Justice Terms of Reference External monitoring mission for the Project Mid-Term Review a) Standard UNDP M&E requirements The UNDP M&E (monitoring and

More information

Planning, Budgeting and Financing

Planning, Budgeting and Financing English Version Planning, Budgeting and Financing Post-Disaster Recovery and Reconstruction Activities in Khammouane Province, Lao PDR Developed under the Khammouane Development Project (KDP), Implemented

More information

Terms of Reference (ToR)

Terms of Reference (ToR) Terms of Reference (ToR) Mid -Term Evaluations of the Two Programmes: UNDP Support to Deepening Democracy and Accountable Governance in Rwanda (DDAG) and Promoting Access to Justice, Human Rights and Peace

More information

Final Evaluation & Outcome Assessment of Promotion of Sustainable Agriculture for Nutrition and Food Security (POSAN FS) Project

Final Evaluation & Outcome Assessment of Promotion of Sustainable Agriculture for Nutrition and Food Security (POSAN FS) Project Terms of Reference (TOR) For Final Evaluation & Outcome Assessment of Promotion of Sustainable Agriculture for Nutrition and Food Security (POSAN FS) Project Re-circulation date: 11/01/ Closing date: 18/01/

More information

TERMS OF REFERENCE Final evaluation consultant AUP Project, Kayin State, Myanmar

TERMS OF REFERENCE Final evaluation consultant AUP Project, Kayin State, Myanmar TERMS OF REFERENCE Final evaluation consultant AUP Project, Kayin State, Myanmar 1. Background The European Union approved a project (February 2013 to April 2017) implemented by a consortium of HelpAge

More information

Management response to the recommendations deriving from the evaluation of the Mali country portfolio ( )

Management response to the recommendations deriving from the evaluation of the Mali country portfolio ( ) Executive Board Second regular session Rome, 26 29 November 2018 Distribution: General Date: 23 October 2018 Original: English Agenda item 7 WFP/EB.2/2018/7-C/Add.1 Evaluation reports For consideration

More information

Terms of Reference (ToR) Business Potential survey in Doti District

Terms of Reference (ToR) Business Potential survey in Doti District Terms of Reference (ToR) Business Potential survey in Doti District 1. Background Good Neighbors International (GNI) is an international humanitarian and development NGO in general consultative status

More information

Coordination and Implementation of the National AIDS Response

Coordination and Implementation of the National AIDS Response Coordination and Implementation of the National AIDS Response Iris Semini, MENA RST Yvonne Nkrumah, ASAP Oussama Tawil THE 3 ONES Comprehensive Response to HIV Prevention, Treatment, Care and Support toward

More information

Guidelines for the United Nations Trust Fund for Human Security

Guidelines for the United Nations Trust Fund for Human Security Guidelines for the United Nations Trust Fund for Human Security Eighth Revision 1 30 October 2014 1 This sets out the revised Guidelines for the United Nations Trust Fund for Human Security, effective

More information

Fund for Gender Equality Monitoring and Evaluation Framework Executive Summary

Fund for Gender Equality Monitoring and Evaluation Framework Executive Summary Fund for Gender Equality Monitoring and Framework Executive Summary Primary Goal of the Monitoring and Framework The overall aim of this Monitoring and (M&E) Framework is to ensure that the Fund for Gender

More information

EXTERNAL END OF PROJECT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

EXTERNAL END OF PROJECT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION EXTERNAL END OF PROJECT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION 1. Background TERMS OF REFERENCE PT. Rainforest Alliance (RA) is leading a consortium group in implementing the Cocoa Revolution: High-Yielding Climate Smart

More information

United Nations Fund for Recovery Reconstruction and Development in Darfur (UNDF)

United Nations Fund for Recovery Reconstruction and Development in Darfur (UNDF) United Nations Fund for Recovery Reconstruction and Development in Darfur (UNDF) Terms of Reference 29 March 2013 1 Contents I. Introduction... 3 II. Purpose, Scope and Principles of the UNDF... 4 III.

More information

Terms of Reference. Impact Assessment Study of

Terms of Reference. Impact Assessment Study of Terms of Reference For Impact Assessment Study of Partnership in Climate Services for Resilient Agriculture in India (PCSRA) ToR No: ABC122019XYZ Dated: 31-1-2019 Partnership in Climate Services for Resilient

More information

WSSCC, Global Sanitation Fund (GSF)

WSSCC, Global Sanitation Fund (GSF) Annex I WSSCC, Global Sanitation Fund (GSF) Terms of Reference Country Programme Monitor (CPM) BURKINA FASO 1 Background The Water Supply and Sanitation Collaborative Council (WSSCC) was established in

More information

Roma Integration 2020

Roma Integration 2020 Roma Integration 2020 is co-funded by the European Union Roma Integration 2020 Reference number: 018-018 Terms of Reference: Title: Contracting Authority: RCC Department: Reporting to: Application Deadline:

More information

Ethiopia Protection of Basic Services Social Accountability Program Social Accountability Guide First edition

Ethiopia Protection of Basic Services Social Accountability Program Social Accountability Guide First edition Ethiopia Protection of Basic Services Social Accountability Program Social Accountability Guide First edition Chapter 0 of 13 Ethiopia Social Accountability Program Phase 2 MANAGEMENT AGENCY Multi Donor

More information

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR INDIVIDUAL CONTRACTORS

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR INDIVIDUAL CONTRACTORS TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR INDIVIDUAL CONTRACTORS ASSIGNMENT TITLE: International Planning/Budgeting Expert Discussion Paper - Integration of the SDGs into Myanmar s Planning and Budgeting Frameworks DURATION:

More information

PEFA Handbook. Volume I: The PEFA Assessment Process Planning, Managing and Using PEFA

PEFA Handbook. Volume I: The PEFA Assessment Process Planning, Managing and Using PEFA PEFA Handbook Volume I: The PEFA Assessment Process Planning, Managing and Using PEFA Second edition November 20, 2018 PEFA Secretariat Washington DC, USA Table of Contents PEFA ASSESSMENT HANDBOOK...

More information

LCRP Steering Committee Meeting 3 JULY 2018

LCRP Steering Committee Meeting 3 JULY 2018 LCRP Steering Committee Meeting 3 JULY 2018 Agenda Opening speech by H.E. Minister of Social Affairs, Pierre Bou Assi Welcome note by the UN RC/HC, Philippe Lazzarini Overview of the LCRP 2017: funding,

More information

Framework Programmes

Framework Programmes GZ: RL/10-ZGI/2017 Framework Programmes Co-financing of Austrian Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) Funding Guideline the operational unit of the Austrian Development Cooperation Zelinkagasse 2, 1010 Vienna,

More information

UN BHUTAN COUNTRY FUND

UN BHUTAN COUNTRY FUND UN BHUTAN COUNTRY FUND Terms of Reference Introduction: 1. The UN system in Bhutan is implementing the One Programme 2014-2018. The One Programme is the result of a highly consultative and participatory

More information

2 nd INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL EVALUATION of the EUROPEAN UNION AGENCY FOR FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS (FRA)

2 nd INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL EVALUATION of the EUROPEAN UNION AGENCY FOR FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS (FRA) 2 nd INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL EVALUATION of the EUROPEAN UNION AGENCY FOR FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS (FRA) TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS 15 July 2016 1 1) Title of the contract The title of the contract is 2nd External

More information

NEPAD/Spanish Fund for African Women s empowerment

NEPAD/Spanish Fund for African Women s empowerment NEPAD/Spanish Fund for African Women s empowerment Project Proposal Format Annex 0 1 P age Proposal Format Proposal Cover Page: PROPOSAL TO THE NEPAD- SPANISH FUND FOR AFRICAN WOMEN s EMPOWERMENT Organization

More information

DESK REVIEW UNDP AFGHANISTAN OVERSIGHT OF THE MONITORING AGENT OF THE LAW AND ORDER TRUST FUND FOR AFGHANISTAN

DESK REVIEW UNDP AFGHANISTAN OVERSIGHT OF THE MONITORING AGENT OF THE LAW AND ORDER TRUST FUND FOR AFGHANISTAN UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME DESK REVIEW OF UNDP AFGHANISTAN OVERSIGHT OF THE MONITORING AGENT OF THE LAW AND ORDER TRUST FUND FOR AFGHANISTAN Report No. 1310 Issue Date: 9 October 2014 Table of

More information

MANUAL OF PROCEDURES FOR DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS TO PARTICIPATING PARTNERS

MANUAL OF PROCEDURES FOR DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS TO PARTICIPATING PARTNERS MANUAL OF PROCEDURES FOR DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS TO PARTICIPATING PARTNERS Global Strategy to Improve Agricultural and Rural Statistics The main steps of the procedure for disbursement of funds (from the

More information

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE TEAM LEADER NATIONAL INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANT

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE TEAM LEADER NATIONAL INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANT TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE TEAM LEADER NATIONAL INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANT MID TERM REVIEW OF THE MAINSTREAMING SUSTAINABLE LAND MANAGEMENT IN AGROPASTORAL PRODUCTION SYSTEMS OF KENYA PROJECT 1. INTRODUCTION

More information

Open Call for Consulting Services Consultant for Mapping of funding opportunities for Roma integration measures, policies and programs

Open Call for Consulting Services Consultant for Mapping of funding opportunities for Roma integration measures, policies and programs Roma Integration 2020 is co-funded by the European Union Open Call for Consulting Services Consultant for Mapping of funding opportunities for Roma integration measures, policies and programs 022-017 Reference

More information

UNDP Pakistan Monitoring Policy STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT UNIT UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME, PAKISTAN

UNDP Pakistan Monitoring Policy STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT UNIT UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME, PAKISTAN UNDP Pakistan Monitoring Policy STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT UNIT UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME, PAKISTAN Approved Version April 2014 Contents Contents... 2 1. Key Elements of Results Based Management in

More information

Hawala cash transfers for food assistance and livelihood protection

Hawala cash transfers for food assistance and livelihood protection Afghanistan Hawala cash transfers for food assistance and livelihood protection EUROPEAN COMMISSION Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection In response to repeated flooding, ACF implemented a cash-based

More information

UNDP Initiation Plan to programme the project preparation grant received from the GEF. (otherwise called GEF PPG)

UNDP Initiation Plan to programme the project preparation grant received from the GEF. (otherwise called GEF PPG) UNDP Initiation Plan to programme the project preparation grant received from the GEF (otherwise called GEF PPG) effective for all PIFs approved as of GEF November work programme 2017 A. Background: The

More information

INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT NOTICE TOR - CONSULTANCY IC/2012/026. Date: 16 April 2012

INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT NOTICE TOR - CONSULTANCY IC/2012/026. Date: 16 April 2012 INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT NOTICE IC/2012/026 TOR - CONSULTANCY Date: 16 April 2012 Position: Consultant - RESOURCE MOBILISATION STRATEGY 2012-2015 for UNCT ETHIOPIA Duty Station: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

More information

Pacific Islands Regional Oceanscape Program (PROP) Project Number: P151780

Pacific Islands Regional Oceanscape Program (PROP) Project Number: P151780 Pacific Islands Regional Oceanscape Program (PROP) Project Number: P151780 Department of Fisheries Ministry of Natural Resources Teone, Funafuti TUVALU Email: proptuv@gmail.com / proptuv@tuvalufisheries.tv

More information

PROJECT PROPOSAL WRITING (A Tool for Resource Mobilization and Effective Attainment of Organization Objectives) OJI OGBUREKE, PhD November 2011

PROJECT PROPOSAL WRITING (A Tool for Resource Mobilization and Effective Attainment of Organization Objectives) OJI OGBUREKE, PhD November 2011 PROJECT PROPOSAL WRITING (A Tool for Resource Mobilization and Effective Attainment of Organization Objectives) OJI OGBUREKE, PhD November 2011 OBJECTIVES OF THE PRESENTATION By the end of the presentation,

More information

Overview of the Social Transfers Policy Framework. NAP 2 Pillars Key features of the HSCT Who are the stakeholders? How will it be implemented?

Overview of the Social Transfers Policy Framework. NAP 2 Pillars Key features of the HSCT Who are the stakeholders? How will it be implemented? Overview of the Social Transfers Policy Framework. NAP 2 Pillars Key features of the HSCT Who are the stakeholders? How will it be implemented? Where will it be implemented? When will it be implemented?

More information

VANUATU NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE MASTERPLAN. Terms of Reference for Consultants

VANUATU NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE MASTERPLAN. Terms of Reference for Consultants VANUATU NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE MASTERPLAN Terms of Reference for Consultants 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Government of Vanuatu has requested TA support in the formulation and preparation of a national infrastructure

More information

Definitions. Terms of Reference

Definitions. Terms of Reference Terms of Reference National or International consultants: International Description of the assignment (Title of consultancy): Mid-Term Review of the LEPAP project Project Title: Lebanon Environmental Pollution

More information

E Distribution: GENERAL. Executive Board Second Regular Session. Rome, October September 2007 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH

E Distribution: GENERAL. Executive Board Second Regular Session. Rome, October September 2007 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH Executive Board Second Regular Session Rome, 22 26 October 2007! E Distribution: GENERAL 11 September 2007 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH Cost (United States dollars) Current budget Increase Revised budget WFP food

More information

STEP 7. Before starting Step 7, you will have

STEP 7. Before starting Step 7, you will have STEP 7 Gap analysis Handing out mosquito nets in Bubulo village, Uganda Photo credit: Geoff Sayer/Oxfam Step 7 completes the gap-analysis strand. It should produce a final estimate of the total shortfall

More information

UNICEF Moldova. Terms of Reference

UNICEF Moldova. Terms of Reference UNICEF Moldova Terms of Reference Individual Consultancy on Public Finance for Development of the National Action Plan for Gradual Implementation of the Sanitary and Hygiene Norms for Preschools Duration

More information

(1) PROJECT COORDINATOR (2) SENIOR EXPERT RESILIENCE

(1) PROJECT COORDINATOR (2) SENIOR EXPERT RESILIENCE TERMS OF REFERENCE bx (1) PROJECT COORDINATOR (2) SENIOR EXPERT RESILIENCE INCEPTION PHASE OF UNICEF RESILIENCE PROJECT IN SOMALIA This TOR is to support the process of hiring a consultant for the project

More information

Public Service Provision Improvement Programme for Agriculture and Rural Development in Hoa Binh and Cao Bang, Vietnam ( )

Public Service Provision Improvement Programme for Agriculture and Rural Development in Hoa Binh and Cao Bang, Vietnam ( ) Public Service Provision Improvement Programme for Agriculture and Rural Development in Hoa Binh and Cao Bang, Vietnam (2008-2015) Phase 1: 2008-2010 Development Goal To contribute to the improvement of

More information

INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT NOTICE

INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT NOTICE INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT NOTICE Date: April 9th, 2018 Duty Station: Home based Description of the assignment: 12842 RSC 2018 SUSTAINABLE PALM OIL INITIATIVE -SENIOR STRATEGY AND PARTNERSHIP ADVISOR

More information

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 291 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 291 thereof, L 244/12 COMMISSION IMPLEMTING REGULATION (EU) No 897/2014 of 18 August 2014 laying down specific provisions for the implementation of cross-border cooperation programmes financed under Regulation (EU)

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS SUBJECTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS. Roles and responsibilities

TABLE OF CONTENTS SUBJECTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS. Roles and responsibilities IDP REVIEW PROCESS PLAN DEPARTMENT OF THE OFFICE OF THE MUNICIPAL MANAGER JULY 2009-JUNE2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUBJECTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS Roles and responsibilities 2.1 Council

More information

Financial Monitoring of a Development Project by FMSF - A Concept Note

Financial Monitoring of a Development Project by FMSF - A Concept Note Financial Monitoring of a Development Project by FMSF - A Concept Note Section 1 About Monitoring 1.1 What is Monitoring? Monitoring is. To check that things are going as per plan. Monitoring is the systematic

More information

Strategic Partnerships

Strategic Partnerships GZ: RL/6-OE/2017 Strategic Partnerships with Austrian Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) Funding Guideline the operational unit of the Austrian Development Cooperation Zelinkagasse 2, 1010 Vienna, phone:

More information

OFFICIAL -1 L(-L DOCUMENTS. Between. and

OFFICIAL -1 L(-L DOCUMENTS. Between. and Public Disclosure Authorized OFFICIAL -1 L(-L DOCUMENTS ADDENDUM No 2 TO ADMINISTRATION AGREEMENT Between Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized the EUROPEAN UNION (represented by the

More information

Terms of Reference FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANTS/CONTRACTORS (IC)

Terms of Reference FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANTS/CONTRACTORS (IC) Terms of Reference FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANTS/CONTRACTORS (IC) Post Title: Consultancy Services Terminal Evaluation for the Kenya Adaptation to Climate Change in Arid Lands (KACCAL) project Agency/Project

More information

ANNEX I: TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR)

ANNEX I: TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) ANNEX I: TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) National Communications Consultant for UNDP Project: Strengthening Transparency and Code of Ethics for Enhanced Public Confidence in Court of Cassation in Turkey 1. Background

More information

«HUMANITARIAN PROGRAMME MANAGER» (HPM) TRAINING PROGRAMME MANAGING FINANCE & FUNDING

«HUMANITARIAN PROGRAMME MANAGER» (HPM) TRAINING PROGRAMME MANAGING FINANCE & FUNDING SHORT TRAINING EUROPE 2012 «HUMANITARIAN PROGRAMME MANAGER» (HPM) TRAINING PROGRAMME MANAGING FINANCE & FUNDING Une formation au métier de Logisticien de Santé + Dates November 5-23 2012 _ LYON _ 2000

More information

EVALUATION AND FITNESS CHECK (FC) ROADMAP

EVALUATION AND FITNESS CHECK (FC) ROADMAP TITLE OF THE EVALUATION/FC LEAD DG RESPONSIBLE UNIT TYPE OF EVALUATION EVALUATION AND FITNESS CHECK (FC) ROADMAP Evaluation of the impact of the CAP measures towards the general objective "viable food

More information

BACKGROUND PAPER ON COUNTRY STRATEGIC PLANS

BACKGROUND PAPER ON COUNTRY STRATEGIC PLANS BACKGROUND PAPER ON COUNTRY STRATEGIC PLANS Informal Consultation 7 December 2015 World Food Programme Rome, Italy PURPOSE 1. This update of the country strategic planning approach summarizes the process

More information

BASELINE SURVEY ON REVENUE COLLECTION & STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING LOCAL REVENUE IN PUNTLAND May- June 2013

BASELINE SURVEY ON REVENUE COLLECTION & STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING LOCAL REVENUE IN PUNTLAND May- June 2013 BASELINE SURVEY ON REVENUE COLLECTION & STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING LOCAL REVENUE IN PUNTLAND May- June 2013 Jointly Conducted by: Puntland Ministries of Interior and Finance Garowe 1 Acknowledgement The

More information

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANT

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANT Advertised on behalf of: TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANT POST TITLE: National Consultant to formulate the upgraded guideline packages of the District Development Fund (DDF) AGENCY/PROJECT

More information

Guideline for strengthened bilateral relations. EEA and Norway Grants

Guideline for strengthened bilateral relations. EEA and Norway Grants Guideline for strengthened bilateral relations EEA and Norway Grants 2009 2014 Adopted by the Financial Mechanism Committee 29.03.2012, amended on 28 January 2016 Contents 1 Purpose of the guideline...

More information

TERMS OF REFERENCE EXTERNAL EVALUATION OF UNICEF S CASH TRANSFER PROJECT IN NIGER SEPTEMBER 2010

TERMS OF REFERENCE EXTERNAL EVALUATION OF UNICEF S CASH TRANSFER PROJECT IN NIGER SEPTEMBER 2010 TERMS OF REFERENCE EXTERNAL EVALUATION OF UNICEF S CASH TRANSFER PROJECT IN NIGER SEPTEMBER 2010 I. Background Following poor crops in 2009-2010 in Niger, the vulnerability survey conducted in April 2010

More information

Adolescents 360 Baseline Survey Request for Proposals (RFP)

Adolescents 360 Baseline Survey Request for Proposals (RFP) Adolescents 360 Baseline Survey Request for Proposals (RFP) Background This invitation to tender invites proposals from potential service providers for conducting a baseline survey for the Adolescent 360

More information

CALL FOR PROPOSAL. Title: Improving Tenure Security of Smallholder Farmers in Select Areas in the Philippines

CALL FOR PROPOSAL. Title: Improving Tenure Security of Smallholder Farmers in Select Areas in the Philippines CALL FOR PROPOSAL The purpose of the Call for Expression of Interest is to solicit interest from regional or national not for profit rural civil society organizations as Implementing Partners that wish

More information

Terms of Reference for consultancy to carry out Project Base line study in the Malawi, Mozambique, Tanzania, Zambia and SADC region

Terms of Reference for consultancy to carry out Project Base line study in the Malawi, Mozambique, Tanzania, Zambia and SADC region Terms of Reference for consultancy to carry out Project Base line study in the Malawi, Mozambique, Tanzania, Zambia and SADC region STRENGTHENING THE SOCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY AND OVERSIGHT CAPACITY OF PARLIAMENTARY

More information

Building a Nation: Sint Maarten National Development Plan and Institutional Strengthening. (1st January 31st March 2013) First-Quarter Report

Building a Nation: Sint Maarten National Development Plan and Institutional Strengthening. (1st January 31st March 2013) First-Quarter Report Building a Nation: Sint Maarten National Development Plan and Institutional Strengthening (1st January 31st March 2013) First-Quarter Report Contents 1. BACKGROUND OF PROJECT... 3 2. PROJECT OVERVIEW...

More information

South Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund Allocation Process Guidelines

South Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund Allocation Process Guidelines South Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund Allocation Process Guidelines 27 January 2012 ACRONYMS AB CAP CERF CHF HC HCT HFU ISWG NCE NGO OCHA OPS PPA PRT PUNO TOR UN UNDP Advisory Board Consolidated Appeal

More information

TCP Facility COMPONENT DESCRIPTION

TCP Facility COMPONENT DESCRIPTION TCP Facility COMPONENT DESCRIPTION Title of the component: Provide assistance to the State Service for Food Safety of the Ministry of Agriculture of Armenia with risk assessment methodology and system

More information

Community Participatory Monitoring

Community Participatory Monitoring Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Ministry for Rural Rehabilitation and Development National Solidarity Programme Monitoring and Evaluation Department Community Participatory Monitoring Implementation of

More information

Progress on the Strengthening of the European Integration Structures

Progress on the Strengthening of the European Integration Structures TENTH MEETING OF THE STABILISATION AND ASSOCIATION PROCESS TRACKING MECHANISM CONCLUSIONS PRISTINA, 14 JULY 2006 The tenth meeting of the Stabilisation and Association Process Tracking Mechanism was held

More information

PROJECT PROPOSAL PROJECT TITLE: BUILD SCHOOL TOILETS FOR 1000 PUPILS IN MALAWI PREPARED BY PRESENTED TO THE GLOBAL GIVING UK OCTOBER, 2015

PROJECT PROPOSAL PROJECT TITLE: BUILD SCHOOL TOILETS FOR 1000 PUPILS IN MALAWI PREPARED BY PRESENTED TO THE GLOBAL GIVING UK OCTOBER, 2015 PROJECT PROPOSAL PROJECT TITLE: BUILD SCHOOL TOILETS FOR 1000 PUPILS IN MALAWI PREPARED BY ACTION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (ASUD) P.O. BOX 91, MZUZU, MALAWI Mobile: +265 888 389 619 EMAIL: actionsustainable@gmail.com

More information

CEI Know-how Exchange Programme (KEP) KEP AUSTRIA Call Expression of Interest

CEI Know-how Exchange Programme (KEP) KEP AUSTRIA Call Expression of Interest ANNEX I To be completed by the CEI Executive Secretariat Ref. No.: 1206.XXXA-14 CEI Know-how Exchange Programme (KEP) KEP AUSTRIA Call 2015 Expression of Interest IMPORTANT This Expression of Interest,

More information

Date of Issue: 25 August 2017 Closing Date: 31 August 2017 SSA Announcement No. UNWOMEN/MCO/2017/030

Date of Issue: 25 August 2017 Closing Date: 31 August 2017 SSA Announcement No. UNWOMEN/MCO/2017/030 Date of Issue: 25 August 2017 Closing Date: 31 August 2017 SSA Announcement No. UNWOMEN/MCO/2017/030 I. POSITION INFORMATION Title Duty Station Type of Contract Contract Duration No of Positions Contract

More information

PEFA Handbook. Volume I: The PEFA Assessment Process Planning, Managing and Using PEFA

PEFA Handbook. Volume I: The PEFA Assessment Process Planning, Managing and Using PEFA PEFA Handbook Volume I: The PEFA Assessment Process Planning, Managing and Using PEFA October 18, 2016 PEFA Secretariat Washington DC USA 1 Table of Contents PEFA ASSESSMENT HANDBOOK... 5 Preface... 5

More information

75 working days spread over 4 months with possibility of extension 1. BACKGROUND

75 working days spread over 4 months with possibility of extension 1. BACKGROUND TERMS OF REFERENCE 1. Environmental Finance Expert Contracting Agency: Coordinating Agency: Place: Expected duration: United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Bhutan UNDP Country Office Thimphu, Bhutan.

More information

Terms of Reference. Protection, Care and Support of Children and Families Living with HIV, Consultancy

Terms of Reference. Protection, Care and Support of Children and Families Living with HIV, Consultancy Terms of Reference Protection, Care and Support of Children and Families Living with HIV, Consultancy Location: NYHQ Language(s) Required: English, French is an advantage Travel: Yes, as required Duration

More information

TERMS OF REFERENCE FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST FUND

TERMS OF REFERENCE FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST FUND TERMS OF REFERENCE FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST FUND Type of Position: Local consultant Sustainable finance expert Location: Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia Type of Contract: Individual contract Expected

More information

TERMS OF REFERENCE Overview assessment of DSW institutional structure. 1. Background

TERMS OF REFERENCE Overview assessment of DSW institutional structure. 1. Background TERMS OF REFERENCE Overview assessment of DSW institutional structure 1. Background HelpAge International has supported Myanmar since 2004 and has been an implementing partner of the Livelihoods and Food

More information

UNDP Sudan, CPAP Mid-Term Review Terms of Reference (Draft)

UNDP Sudan, CPAP Mid-Term Review Terms of Reference (Draft) UNDP Sudan, CPAP 2009-2012 Mid-Term Review Terms of Reference (Draft) 1. Background and Rationale for the Mid-Term Review The United Nations Development Assistance Framework for Sudan (UNDAF) 2009-2012

More information

Malawi Public Works Program- Local Development Fund (LDF) Mechanism Project. John Ng ambi Social Development Specialist Malawi Social Action Fund

Malawi Public Works Program- Local Development Fund (LDF) Mechanism Project. John Ng ambi Social Development Specialist Malawi Social Action Fund Malawi Public Works Program- Local Development Fund (LDF) Mechanism Project John Ng ambi Social Development Specialist Malawi Social Action Fund Brief overview of the program Objectives (PDO): MASAF III

More information

Chapter 6 MPRS Implementation, Monitoring and Evaluation

Chapter 6 MPRS Implementation, Monitoring and Evaluation Chapter 6 MPRS Implementation, Monitoring and Evaluation The implementation of the MPRS will involve all stakeholders. However, the responsibility for overall co-ordination of implementation will rest

More information

Food security and linking relief, rehabilitation and development in the European Commission

Food security and linking relief, rehabilitation and development in the European Commission FAO International Workshop on Food Security in Complex Emergencies: building policy frameworks to address longer-term programming challenges Tivoli, 23-25 September 2003 Food security and linking relief,

More information

OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS. The World Bank. Public Disclosure Authorized. Public Disclosure Authorized

OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS. The World Bank. Public Disclosure Authorized. Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS The World Bank 1818 H Street N.W. (202) 473-1000 INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT Washington, D.C. 20433 Cable Address: INTBAFRAD INTERNATIONAL

More information

CHF Sudan 2015 Standard Allocation. Project Proposal and Budget Guidelines: SUBMISSION OF CONCEPT NOTES

CHF Sudan 2015 Standard Allocation. Project Proposal and Budget Guidelines: SUBMISSION OF CONCEPT NOTES CHF Sudan 2015 Standard Allocation Project Proposal and Budget Guidelines: SUBMISSION OF CONCEPT NOTES Content 1. Eligibility criteria and allocation process 2. Creation of project Concept Note 3. Project

More information

Project management guidelines. November 2013

Project management guidelines. November 2013 p r o j e c t m a n a g e m e n t g u i d e l i n e s N O V E M B E R 2 0 1 3 T e l e c o m m u n i c a t i o n D e v e l o p m e n t S e c t o r Project management guidelines November 2013 Please consider

More information

Evaluating the Mchinji Social Cash Transfer Pilot

Evaluating the Mchinji Social Cash Transfer Pilot Evaluating the Mchinji Social Cash Transfer Pilot Dr. Candace Miller Center for International Health and Development Boston University & Maxton Tsoka Centre for Social Research University of Malawi Benefits

More information

ZIMBABWE_Reporting format for final scoring (Ref. 4)

ZIMBABWE_Reporting format for final scoring (Ref. 4) Process 1: Bringing people in the same space Score each step: 0 (not applicable); 1 (started); 2 (on-going); 3 (nearly completed); 4 (completed) STEP 1. Select/develop coordinating mechanisms at country

More information

Child Rights Governance, Education, Protection, Health and Nutrition Youth and Livelihood, HIV and AIDS, Emergency and Disaster Management

Child Rights Governance, Education, Protection, Health and Nutrition Youth and Livelihood, HIV and AIDS, Emergency and Disaster Management 1. Title of project: Engaging civil society organisations in advocating and sustaining political will for government action for scaling up nutrition 2. Location: Nepal 3. Details of focal point organisation

More information

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR CONDUCTING MID-TERM EVALUATION FOR MALARIA PROJECT IN GEITA

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR CONDUCTING MID-TERM EVALUATION FOR MALARIA PROJECT IN GEITA TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR CONDUCTING MID-TERM EVALUATION FOR MALARIA PROJECT IN GEITA Harnessing on the Private Health Sectors Potential in the Fight against Malaria 1.0. Introduction and Background Information

More information

Indicator Performance Tracking Table (IPTT)

Indicator Performance Tracking Table (IPTT) Food for Peace Monitoring and Evaluation Workshop for FFP Development Food Security Activities Indicator Performance Tracking Table (IPTT) January, 2018 Kampala, Uganda Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance

More information

FRAMEWORK AND WORK PROGRAM FOR GEF S MONITORING, EVALUATION AND DISSEMINATION ACTIVITIES

FRAMEWORK AND WORK PROGRAM FOR GEF S MONITORING, EVALUATION AND DISSEMINATION ACTIVITIES GEF/C.8/4 GEF Council October 8-10, 1996 Agenda Item 6 FRAMEWORK AND WORK PROGRAM FOR GEF S MONITORING, EVALUATION AND DISSEMINATION ACTIVITIES RECOMMENDED DRAFT COUNCIL DECISION The Council reviewed document

More information

2011 SURVEY ON MONITORING THE PARIS DECLARATION

2011 SURVEY ON MONITORING THE PARIS DECLARATION TASK TEAM ON MONITORING THE PARIS DECLARATION 2011 SURVEY ON MONITORING THE PARIS DECLARATION Revised Survey Materials Initial Annotated Draft 3 May 2010 FOR COMMENT This initial text with annotations

More information

Annex 1. Action Fiche for Solomon Islands

Annex 1. Action Fiche for Solomon Islands Annex 1 Action Fiche for Solomon Islands 1. IDENTIFICATION Title/Number FED/2012/023-802 Second Solomon Islands Technical Cooperation Facility (TCF II) Total cost EUR 1,157,000 Aid method / Method of implementation

More information

Consultancy Announcement

Consultancy Announcement Consultancy Announcement Title of Consultant : Monitoring and Evaluation Consultant Timeframe : 5 months (November 2018 March 2019) BACKGROUND My Justice: Strengthening Women s Access to Justice in Mon

More information

OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME under THE FUND FOR EUROPEAN AID TO THE MOST DEPRIVED

OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME under THE FUND FOR EUROPEAN AID TO THE MOST DEPRIVED OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME under THE FUND FOR EUROPEAN AID TO THE MOST DEPRIVED 2014-2020 1. IDENTIFICATION (max. 200 characters) The purpose of this section is to identify only the programme concerned. It

More information

SPECIFIC TERMS OF REFERENCE. EU contribution to 2012 Federal PEFA assessment in Pakistan

SPECIFIC TERMS OF REFERENCE. EU contribution to 2012 Federal PEFA assessment in Pakistan SPECIFIC TERMS OF REFERENCE EU contribution to 2012 Federal PEFA assessment in Pakistan FWC BENEFICIARIES 2009 - LOT 11: Macro economy, Statistics and Public finance management DCI-ASIE/2011/277245/1 1

More information

JORDAN. Terms of Reference

JORDAN. Terms of Reference JORDAN Terms of Reference Jordan: Strengthening municipal financial management systems to sustain service delivery in municipalities affected by the refugee crisis Assessment of Municipal Public Financial

More information

TERMS OF REFERENCE Project Mid Term Evaluation

TERMS OF REFERENCE Project Mid Term Evaluation 1. Project Summary Project Title: TERMS OF REFERENCE Project Mid Term Evaluation PIMS 2091 Coastal and Marine biodiversity conservation and sustainable use in the Con Dao islands region Project ID: 00049728

More information

ANNEX. Technical Cooperation Facility - Suriname Total cost 2,300,000 (EC contribution 100%) Aid method / Management mode

ANNEX. Technical Cooperation Facility - Suriname Total cost 2,300,000 (EC contribution 100%) Aid method / Management mode ANNEX 1. IDTIFICATION Title Technical Cooperation Facility - Suriname Total cost 2,300,000 (EC contribution 100%) Aid method / Management mode DAC-code 15010 Project approach Partially decentralised management.

More information

SPECIFIC TERMS OF REFERENCE Country Programme Interim Evaluation (CPiE)

SPECIFIC TERMS OF REFERENCE Country Programme Interim Evaluation (CPiE) SPECIFIC TERMS OF REFERENCE Country Programme Interim Evaluation (CPiE) FWC BENEFICIARIES 2009 - LOT 11: Macro Economy, Statistics, Public Finance Management EuropeAid/127054/C/SER/multi 1. BACKGROUND

More information

Committee Recommendations (10, 11, & 12)

Committee Recommendations (10, 11, & 12) 3. MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND IRRIGATION 3.1 2001 Committee Recommendations (10, 11, & 12) Number 10 Extension Services: Substantially increase the budget for Government extension services, and designate

More information

GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING A PROVINCIAL PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW (PPER) OF THE AGRICULTURE SECTOR

GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING A PROVINCIAL PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW (PPER) OF THE AGRICULTURE SECTOR Socialist Republic of Vietnam MINISTRY OF FINANCE VIE/96/028: Public Expenditure Review Phase GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING A PROVINCIAL PUBLIC EPENDITURE REVIEW (PPER) OF THE AGRICULTURE SECTOR DECEMBER 2001

More information

AUDIT UNDP AFGHANISTAN. Local Governance Project (Project No ) Report No Issue Date: 23 December 2016

AUDIT UNDP AFGHANISTAN. Local Governance Project (Project No ) Report No Issue Date: 23 December 2016 UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME AUDIT OF UNDP AFGHANISTAN Local Governance Project (Project No. 90448) Report No. 1745 Issue Date: 23 December 2016 Table of Contents Executive Summary i I. About the

More information

Regulation on the implementation of the European Economic Area (EEA) Financial Mechanism

Regulation on the implementation of the European Economic Area (EEA) Financial Mechanism the European Economic Area (EEA) Financial Mechanism 2014-2021 Adopted by the EEA Financial Mechanism Committee pursuant to Article 10.5 of Protocol 38c to the EEA Agreement on 8 September 2016 and confirmed

More information

INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT NOTICE

INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT NOTICE INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT NOTICE Reference Code: Country: Description of the Assignment: Project: UNDP/SCR/SSS/IC/2017/08 Turkey Capacity development on operational efficiency and strategic planning

More information

Project Fiche IPA Annual Action Programme 2007 for Bosnia and Herzegovina Support for Rural Development Programming (SRDP) in B&H

Project Fiche IPA Annual Action Programme 2007 for Bosnia and Herzegovina Support for Rural Development Programming (SRDP) in B&H Project Fiche IPA Annual Action Programme 2007 for Bosnia and Herzegovina Support for Rural Development Programming (SRDP) in B&H 1. Basic information 1.1. CRIS Number: 43040 Rural Development 1.2. Title:

More information