November 10, Chairman Simplot and Members of the METRO Board of Directors

Transcription

1 9:45 am I November 17, 2010

2 November 10, 2010 To: From: Chairman Simplot and Members of the METRO Board of Directors Stephen R. Banta, Chief Executive Officer Date: November 17, 2010 Time: Location: 9:45 a.m. METRO 101 N. First Ave., 13 th Floor Board Room Phoenix, AZ Please park in the garage in the US Bank Building (enter from Adams Street) and bring your parking ticket to the meeting as parking will be validated. Transit passes will be provided to those using transit. For those using bicycles, please lock your bicycle in the bike rack located on the 2 nd level of the parking garage across from the ticket handler booth. METRO Board (Board) members may attend the meeting by teleconference. If you have any questions or need additional information regarding attendance by teleconference, please contact Gina Frackiewicz at (602) Item Action Requested 1. Call to Order 2. Call to the Audience Information A 15-minute opportunity will be provided to members of the public at the beginning of the meeting to address the METRO Board on all agenda items. The Chairman may recognize members of the public during the meeting at his/her discretion. Up to three minutes will be provided per speaker. 3. Minutes Action Summary minutes from the October 20, 2010 Board meeting are presented for review and approval. 4. Chief Executive Officer s (CEO) Report Information Stephen R. Banta will brief the Board on current light rail issues. Please see attached ridership information as requested by the Board at a previous meeting.

3 METRO Board of Directors Agenda November 10, 2010 Page 2 of 3 Item Action Requested Consent Agenda 5. Approval of Consent Agenda Action The Board is being requested to take action on the Consent Agenda. Board members may request that items be removed from the Consent Agenda. Items Proposed for Consent 5a. URS Contract Amendment for Phoenix West Extension Consent Staff is requesting that the Board authorize the CEO to amend the Phoenix West Planning, Concept Engineering & Environmental Studies contract no. LRT A-PCES with URS Corporation and extend it until June 30, Please see information attached for Agenda Item 5a for additional information. 5b. Federal Legislative Representative Contract Consent Staff is requesting that the Board authorize the CEO to enter into a contract for federal representation in Washington, D.C. Please see information attached for Agenda Item 5b for additional information. Regular Agenda 6. Tempe South Alternative Analysis Study Recommendation Acceptance Staff is requesting that the Board accept the METRO staff recommendations for the Tempe South Alternatives Analysis. Please see information attached for Agenda Item 6 for additional information. 7. Federal Update Information METRO federal representation is currently provided by Denny Miller & Associates. Representatives from the firm will be present to provide information to the Board on the current status and future outlook of transportation issues and funding at the federal level. There is no additional information attached for this item. 8. Future METRO Board Agenda Items Information The Board may request consideration of future agenda items. No additional information is attached.

4 METRO Board of Directors Agenda November 10, 2010 Page 3 of 3 Item Action Requested 9. Adjournment Action With 24-hours notice, special assistance, including provision of materials in alternate formats, can be provided for persons with sight and/or hearing impairments. Call (voice) or (TTY) to request accommodations.

5 AGENDA ITEM 4 Chief Executive Officer s Report

6 Ridership 2010 Total Avg Weekday Avg Saturday Avg Sunday/Holiday January 1,003,041 37,208 30,055 18,101 February 1,037,398 43,509 27,838 19,876 March 1,161,733 41,413 31,938 20,373 April 1,208,924 44,932 34,533 20,573 May 991,999 37,267 28,366 17,472 June 942,154 35,315 24,370 16,938 July 858,404 29,635 24,321 22,894 August 1,027,760 38,137 26,460 16,579 September 1,179,952 44,577 35,325 20,506 October 1,165,737 43,425 30,039 20,722 November December 2009 vs Total Ridership Change January 911,883 1,003, % February 908,052 1,037, % March 972,962 1,161, % April 1,044,135 1,208, % May 928, ,999 +7% June 815, , % July 750, , % August 882,328 1,027, % September 1,054,286 1,179, % October 1,124,924 1,165,737 +4% November December

7 Ridership By Day for October 2010 Total Ridership By City Mesa Tempe Phoenix Total Mesa Tempe Phoenix Day Total Total Total Total Total % Total % Total % Friday, October 01, ,660 14,334 34,045 53, , % 365, % 691, % Saturday, October 02, ,485 11,755 19,507 34,747 Sunday, October 03, ,213 6,730 12,721 21,664 Weekday Ridership By City Monday, October 04, ,449 12,403 21,382 37,234 Tuesday, October 05, ,818 14,481 22,615 40,914 Mesa Tempe Phoenix Wednesday, October 06, ,102 13,443 22,999 40,544 Total % Total % Total % Total Avg/Day Thursday, October 07, ,321 14,051 22,499 40,871 83, % 283, % 545, % 911,933 43,425 Friday, October 08, ,483 12,224 22,840 38,547 Saturday, October 09, ,084 8,253 17,468 28,805 Saturday Ridership By City Sunday, October 10, ,376 10,270 13,665 26,311 Mesa Tempe Phoenix Monday, October 11, ,351 13,087 23,261 40,699 Tuesday, October 12, ,103 15,578 28,643 48,324 Total % Total % Total % Total Avg/Day Wednesday, October 13, ,311 13,674 27,739 45,724 16, % 48, % 85, % 150,195 30,039 Thursday, October 14, ,403 12,890 24,964 41,257 Friday, October 15, ,717 12,162 28,233 45,112 Sunday/Holiday Ridership By City Saturday, October 16, ,068 6,601 15,638 25,307 Mesa Tempe Phoenix Total Sunday, October 17, ,644 5,244 10,774 17,662 Total % Total % Total % Total Avg/Day Monday, October 18, ,324 13,818 25,774 42,916 Tuesday, October 19, ,887 14,230 26,326 44,443 10, % 33, % 59, % 103,609 20,722 Wednesday, October 20, ,869 14,010 27,508 45,387 Thursday, October 21, ,970 12,624 23,930 40,524 Friday, October 22, ,329 12,578 30,651 47,558 Saturday, October 23, ,492 7,432 16,768 26,692 Sunday, October 24, ,932 4,782 11,136 17,850 Monday, October 25, ,985 13,550 25,472 43,007 Tuesday, October 26, ,169 13,993 27,106 45,268 Wednesday, October 27, ,000 13,757 27,651 45,408 Thursday, October 28, ,257 12,821 24,001 40,079 Friday, October 29, ,697 13,494 27,887 45,078 Saturday, October 30, ,940 14,216 16,488 34,644 Sunday, October 31, ,955 6,553 11,614 20,122 Total 109, , ,305 1,165,737 Total Ridership By Day Of Week Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Total % Total % Total % Total % Thursday Friday Saturday Total % Total % Total % 103, % 163, % 178, % 177, % 162, % 229, % 150, % 11/10/2010 Copy of Oct 10 Passenger Summary-Final (3)

8 AGENDA ITEM 3 Minutes

9 October 20, North First Avenue 13 th Floor Board Room Phoenix, Arizona Board Members Present Councilman Tom Simplot, City of Phoenix Chair Councilmember Shana Ellis, City of Tempe (via teleconference) Mike James, City of Mesa (via teleconference) Jamsheed Mehta, City of Glendale (via teleconference) Councilmember Rick Heumann, City of Chandler Vice Mayor Ron Aames, City of Peoria (via teleconference) Others Present Mathew Dudley, City of Glendale Cary Pfeffer, Clear Comm 1. Call to Order Chairman Simplot called the meeting to order at 9:47 a.m. 2. Call to the Audience There were no requests to address the Board. 3. Minutes IT WAS MOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER HEUMANN AND SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR AAMES AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED TO APPROVE THE SEPTEMBER 15, 2010 MEETING MINUTES. 4. Chief Executive Officer s (CEO) Report Mr. Stephen R. Banta, METRO s Chief Executive Officer, addressed the following items as part of his report: Central Mesa and Tempe South Extensions: Two successful meetings occurred in late September in Washington, DC with the Federal Transit Administration and Congressional Delegation relating to the status of the projects, the importance of the extensions as they impact the communities, and a discussion of continuing to build a total transit network in the valley. Mayor Scott Smith of Mesa and Board Member Shana Ellis also attended the meeting, respectively.

10 METRO Board of Directors Meeting Minutes October 20, 2010 Page 2 of 5 Public hearing meetings related to the streetcar for Tempe South have concluded. Tempe Council will be taking action on October 21 relating to the recommendations on the Tempe South Corridor Alternatives Analysis study. The Central Mesa project is in the project development stage. Mr. Banta thanked Board Members Ellis and Heumann for attending the meetings and supporting the efforts in advancing the Tempe South project. South Central Phoenix Corridor High Capacity Transit Feasibility Study: While in Washington, DC Congressman Pastor and his staff were briefed on the status of the South Central Phoenix Corridor. A Request for Proposals (RFP) for the study has been advertised. A prepoposal conference occurred on October 19. Proposals are due on November 15. METRO Fare Enforcement: Increased efforts are taking place to increase the fare enforcement opportunities along the alignment. METRO is working cooperatively with the member cities to advance the following message: Engage Educate and Enforce. It is important to engage our customers, hold our riders accountable for fare payment and show them that we care about their safety on the system. New and improved Hand Held Verifiers (HHV s) have been deployed to assist in this effort in support of the mission to enforce. The HHV s have the capability to read Platinum Cards, U-Passes, or other fare medium to determine if the customer has tapped or activated their fare. If they have not, it gives us the opportunity to engage, educate, and ultimately enforce. Violations range from $50 to $500. Councilmember Heumann asked if the HHV s have the capability to validate the fare medium. Mr. Banta replied that they do not. The HHV currently provides a tool to determine whether the fare medium is valid. Denver RTD Tour: Prior to the National League of Cities meeting in Denver, RTD staff, Board members, elected leaders, and community members will be providing a tour and presentation of the Denver public transportation system. To date, METRO has received approximately 30 RSVP s from invited METRO, Regional Public Transportation Authority (RPTA), and Maricopa Association of Governments Board Representatives and Members. On November 30, RTD will provide an overview of the regional system, growth of the city, and multimodal options available to the Denver region. Public Private Partnership with the RTD s commuter rail line extending to the airport and the advancement of the regional plan during current economic conditions will also be addressed. Chairman Simplot requested that the details of the Denver tour and presentation are sent to Mr. Mike Trailor, State Housing Director. City of Tempe's Beautification Awards: METRO was a recipient of the award at the October 7 Tempe City Council. The award was for the design, construction, and architectural design of the Light Rail Bridge.

11 METRO Board of Directors Meeting Minutes October 20, 2010 Page 3 of 5 RPTA and METRO Administrative Efficiency Opportunities Team: The RPTA Board will discuss the opportunities at their meeting on October 21. As RPTA is preparing to move into the US Bank Building, both organizations are discussing ways in creating efficiencies between the two organizations. Mr. Banta proposed that the study team involve METRO and RPTA staff to work together in determining the efficiency opportunities and report back to the Board member study commission made up of both organizations. Stop on Red Train Wrap Unveiling Event: The campaign and unveiling of the train wrap to educate the public about stopping on red occurred on October 7 at the Operations and Maintenance Center. Vice Chairman Jones and Board Member Ellis attended. Ridership: Ridership continues to surpass levels of the same month last year. Per Board request, additional options in presenting ridership information, such as ridership by time of day, is being developed. Councilmember Heumann asked if the ridership information presented today represents paid ridership. Mr. Banta replied that the information presented represents passenger boardings utilizing the Automatic Passenger Counters which are installed onboard the trains and noted that information collected from fare inspectors indicates a fare evasion rate of less than one percent. Ridership and revenue are compared on a monthly basis. Councilmember Heumann requested additional information related to fare collection. Mr. Banta stated that based on ridership that surpasses estimates; the revenues are exceeding the budgeted projections for this year. He noted that METRO is about to implement the new HHV s to fare inspectors, which should provide additional fare collection information. Vice Mayor Aames asked if the fare evasion is only one percent and how is that determined. Mr. Banta stated that the fare inspectors collect the information and report it to METRO. The information provided shows less than one percent fare evasion. Councilmember Heumann asked when the data for the recent increased fare enforcement efforts will be available. Mr. Banta stated that the information will begin to be collected upon issuance of the HHV s. He noted that our mission with the enhanced inspection effort is to ensure that we engage, educate, and enforce. It is important to get the attention of our riders, and stepped up enforcement can accomplish that effort. Councilmember Heumann asked to see the analysis at the next meeting to see what it uncovers.

12 METRO Board of Directors Meeting Minutes October 20, 2010 Page 4 of 5 5. Approval of Consent Agenda 5a. Tempe South Extension Public Involvement Support Services IT WAS MOVED BY VICE MAYOR AAMES AND SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER HEUMANN AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED TO AUTHORIZE THE CEO TO EXECUTE A CHANGE ORDER FOR PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SERVICES WITH HDR ENGINEERING, INC. FOR PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SUPPORT AT AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $50,000 FOR FY b. Central Mesa Extension Artist Contracts Councilmember Heumann asked if there is a percentage requirement by statute for art on the METRO system. Mr. Banta stated that there is a percentage on contract value for public art and the amount is determined based on the local city s policies. IT WAS MOVED BY VICE MAYOR AAMES AND SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER HEUMANN AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED TO AUTHORIZE THE CEO TO EXECUTE CONTRACTS WITH THE ARTISTS IDENTIFIED HEREIN. THE ARTISTS WILL INITIALLY BE ASSIGNED A LIMITED NOTICE TO PROCEED FOR DESIGN SERVICES ONLY, IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS. FUTURE AUTHORIZATIONS UP TO THE BUDGETED AMOUNTS IDENTIFIED HEREIN WILL OCCUR AFTER FEDERAL FUNDING APPROVAL HAS BEEN SECURED. 5c. Light Rail Vehicle #144 Repair Contract IT WAS MOVED BY VICE MAYOR AAMES AND SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER HEUMANN AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED TO AUTHORIZE THE CEO TO AWARD A SINGLE SOURCE CONTRACT TO DELAWARE CAR COMPANY FOR THE ACTUAL COSTS TO REPAIR LRV #144 ESTIMATED TO BE $1,094, Regular Agenda 6. Section 5309 Project Budget Adjustments Mr. John McCormack, Director of Finance and Administration, presented information regarding Section 5309 contract budget adjustments to various project elements. The report focused on the specific cost savings in certain budget areas being transferred to cover other project costs. The overall project budget remains within the overall Full Funding Grant Agreement (FFGA) budget. IT WAS MOVED BY VICE MAYOR AAMES AND SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER HEUMANN AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED TO AUTHORIZE THE FOLLOWING CHANGES TO THE SECTION 5309 PROJECT BUDGETS: INCREASE THE STATION FINISHES BUDGET BY $2,009,030 TO $56,590,030; DECREASE THE PROJECT RESERVE BY ($2,009,030) TO $3,596,502.

13 METRO Board of Directors Meeting Minutes October 20, 2010 Page 5 of 5 7. Future METRO Board Agenda Items There were no requests for future agenda items. 8. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 10:04 a.m.

14 AGENDA ITEM 5A URS Contract Amendment for Phoenix West Extension

15 AGENDA ITEM 5A To: Through: From: Chairman Simplot and Members of the METRO Board of Directors Stephen R. Banta, Chief Executive Officer Wulf Grote, Director of Planning and Development Date: November 10, 2010 Re: URS Contract Amendment for Phoenix West Extension PURPOSE The purpose of this item is to request that the METRO Board (Board) authorize the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) to amend the Phoenix West Planning, Concept Engineering and Environmental Studies contract no. LRT A-PCES with URS Corporation and extend it until June 30, BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION The Phoenix West Alternatives Analysis study began on May 21, 2007 with a Notice to Proceed (NTP) issued to URS Corporation to begin phase 1 of the Planning, Conceptual Engineering and Environmental Studies for Phoenix West Extension. Subsequently, an NTP for Phase 2 of the study occurred on April 9, As METRO continues to work with its regional partners, the Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) and Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT), as well as its project stakeholders, new alternatives have been brought forward that require additional planning, concept design and environmental analysis. On July 2008, MAG Regional Council approved the I-10 right-of-way west of I-17 as the preferred location for high capacity transit (HCT) improvements. Since then, METRO has been coordinating with ADOT on their freeway projects on I-10 and I-17: specifically I-10 widening, South Mountain Loop 202 connection and I-17 widening. METRO is currently analyzing a light rail alignment adjacent to the north side of the I-10 freeway that will accommodate freeway improvements near the proposed Loop 202 interchange. This will require additional travel forecasting, conceptual design and environmental work that was not part of the original scope of work. The new alignment efforts will also require additional public outreach in the form of meetings, individual stakeholder briefings, community working groups, etc. The Phoenix West Corridor connects the West Valley to Downtown Phoenix, via the State Capitol, and connects with the Central Phoenix/East Valley Light Rail Transit starter line. The preferred alignment alternative is a transition from I-10 freeway into Downtown Phoenix using the I-17 southbound frontage road. METRO, together with City of Phoenix planning staff are working with community organizations and neighborhoods to identify land use development opportunities near proposed station areas and resolve

16 METRO Board of Directors Memo November 10, 2010 Page 2 community concerns. This will involve additional planning, conceptual design and public outreach not originally included in the URS scope of work. The light rail connection from the I-10 freeway to the I-17 southbound frontage road is proposed to be constructed early and serve as an exclusive bus ramp prior to light rail construction. The bus ramp analysis requires the conceptual design of an alignment and a Change of Access Report (COAR) since it effects current freeway operations. In addition, the current contract is set to expire on December 31, Staff proposes that the contract extend until June 30, 2012 to accommodate the additional efforts required by the study. A description of the scope of work is below: 1. North Side Running Alternative Analysis 2. Expanded Downtown Alternative Evaluation 3. Early Action Program Bus Ramp and 79 th Avenue Park-and-Ride Evaluation 4. Additional Travel Forecasting 5. Technical Assistance/ Support to Public Involvement 6. Additional Economic Development Analysis 7. Refinement of the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) The definition of the Refinement of the LPA task will occur after the adoption of the Locally Preferred Alternative. A separate NTP for this task will occur only upon successful negotiation of a detailed scope of work. FISCAL IMPACT Funds for the proposed scope of work items are available from a combination of regional PTF funds and federal grants. The contract commitment to date for the Phoenix West study is $6,518,986. The proposed contract amendment is for an additional cost not to exceed $1,698,529. The Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 adopted budget includes $1,941,000 for Phoenix West expenses, with anticipated $1,000,000 federal funding and $941,000 from the regional Public Transportation Fund (PTF). Actual Federal Funds available this fiscal year are expected to be $1,475,000 - exceeding the budget plan by $475,000 and reducing the need for PTF funds. Actual expenditures are tracking within budget and the costs for the fiscal year with the contract amendment will remain within the $1,941,000 budget. Costs beyond FY 2011 will be increased by approximately $900,000 with this action. Federal and PTF funding will be available to address the cost increase and will be identified in the next Five Year Plan update. Upon Board authorization, staff proposes that URS receive a NTP for all tasks except the Refinement of the LPA. A second NTP for the Refinement of the LPA task will occur at a future date after adoption of the LPA and negotiation of a detailed scope of work. The initial NTP is for a cost not to exceed $898,529 and the second NTP, for Refinement of the LPA, for a cost not to exceed $800,000.

17 METRO Board of Directors Memo November 10, 2010 Page 3 RAIL MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION On November 3, 2010, the Rail Management Committee (RMC) recommended that the Board authorize the CEO to amend the Phoenix West Planning, Concept Engineering and Environmental Studies contract no. LRT A-PCES with URS Corporation for an additional cost not to exceed $1,698,529 and extend the contract time until June 30, RECOMMENDATION Staff requests that the Board authorize the CEO to amend the Phoenix West Planning, Concept Engineering and Environmental Studies contract no. LRT A-PCES with URS Corporation for an additional cost not to exceed $1,698,529 and extend the contract time until June 30, 2012.

18 AGENDA ITEM 5B Federal Legislative Representative Contract

19 AGENDA ITEM 5B To: Through: From: Chairman Simplot and Members of the METRO Board of Directors Stephen R. Banta, Chief Executive Officer John Farry, Director, Community & Government Relations Date: November 10, 2010 Re: Federal Legislative Representative Contract PURPOSE The purpose of this item is to request that the METRO Board (Board) authorize the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) to enter into a contract for federal representation in Washington, D.C. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION METRO has had federal representation in Washington, D.C. since the formation of the agency. The representation is important to address federal funding and policy issues with Congress and the Administration, to keep the region informed of grants and pending legislation, and to coordinate multi-agency lobbying efforts. In general, tasks of our federal lobbyist include: Providing strategy and guidance in securing Section 5309 New Starts, Small Starts, and Very Small Starts funding opportunities from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) to advance eligible projects in the region; Addressing policy issues related to the Section 5309 New Starts program that emanate from both Congress and the Federal Transit Administration; Pursuing other federal funding for capital facilities, equipment, and operating assistance when available; and Influencing the authorization of surface transportation legislation to include principles adopted by the METRO Board that position the region for eligible funding and policies that benefit public transportation. The cost for the representation has always been shared with Valley Metro/RPTA with each agency agreeing to split expenses equally. With the expiration of the existing contract, the procurement was conducted as a joint procurement from METRO and Valley Metro/RPTA. On August 27, 2010, METRO and RPTA issued a Request for Proposal for a Federal Legislative Counsel capable of representing the interests of the agencies in attaining federal support for regional transit programs. Three proposals were received on September 27, 2010 from Blank Rome, Denny Miller & Associates, and McBee Strategic Consulting.

20 METRO Board of Directors Memo November 10, 2010 Page 2 The proposals were evaluated by a panel of six evaluators representing METRO member cities and the agencies. Evaluation criteria included the consultants work plan, understanding of the agencies needs, qualifications and primary staff, relevant transit experience, overall evaluation of the proposal, and price. The evaluators unanimously selected Denny Miller & Associates as the most advantageous offer for the agencies. FISCAL IMPACT Federal law requires that no federal funding be used to lobby the federal government. As a result, METRO s share of the funding for the contract shall be derived from the Agency Operating Budget that is funded by its member cities. The funding for the Federal Legislative Counsel is included in the FY 2011 METRO Agency Operating Budget at an annual amount of $60,000. The contract includes options for renewal for a total contract period of up to five (5) years. Should the options be exercised, funding for those renewals will be included in future year budgets. RAIL MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION On November 3, 2010, the Rail Management Committee (RMC) recommended that the Board authorize the CEO to enter into a contract with Denny Miller & Associates for federal legislative counsel services. RECOMMENDATION Staff is requesting that the Board authorize the CEO to enter into a contract with Denny Miller & Associates for federal legislative counsel services for a period of one (1) year, with four (4) one (1) year options at an amount not to exceed $300,000 over the five (5) year period, plus expenses approved by the agency.

21 AGENDA ITEM 6 Tempe South Alternative Analysis Study Recommendation

22 AGENDA ITEM 6 To: Through: From: Chairman Simplot and Members of the METRO Board of Directors Stephen R. Banta, Chief Executive Officer Wulf Grote, Director of Planning and Development Date: November 10, 2010 Re: Tempe South Alternatives Analysis Study Recommendation PURPOSE The purpose of this item is to request that the METRO Board (Board) accept the METRO staff recommendations for the Tempe South Alternatives Analysis. Included are recommendations regarding the appropriate transit technology and alignment. Additional study needs are also identified. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION In August 2007, METRO initiated a federally sponsored Alternatives Analysis in the Tempe South corridor. The study initiates the Federal Transit Administration s (FTA s) project development process in order to qualify for Section 5309 Small Start federal funding. Specific purpose and needs of the project were identified and include: Improve mobility of residential and business communities; Develop an efficient transportation system; Accommodate future travel demand; Support local and regional development goals and transit oriented development strategies; Develop a transportation system that is affordable to build, operate, and maintain; Develop transportation strategies that reinforce the cities general plan; and Develop a transportation system that provides connectivity to/from neighborhoods, employment, and recreational opportunities. The Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) includes two significant transit projects within the Tempe South study area; a two-mile high capacity/light rail transit (LRT) improvement extending south from downtown Tempe and a bus rapid transit (BRT) corridor on Scottsdale/Rural Road extending from north Scottsdale to Chandler. Both transit modes were analyzed as part of this study, but only the BRT segment south from downtown Tempe was evaluated as part of the Tempe South study effort. RPTA/METRO, and the cities of Scottsdale and Tempe have undertaken a separate analysis evaluating BRT options north from downtown Tempe to Frank Lloyd Wright Drive in the City of Scottsdale.

23 METRO Board of Directors Memo November 10, 2010 Page 2 Modern streetcar in the Mill Avenue corridor and BRT on Rural Road serve different travel markets in the Tempe South study area. Figure 1 illustrates the three travel markets; each with unique characteristics and service needs: 1) Arizona State University (ASU) 2) North Tempe (exclusive of ASU) and 3) South Tempe/Chandler. ASU, for example, is characterized by an all-day trip pattern that originates in multiple areas of the region. North Tempe is focused around downtown Tempe and is characterized as being pedestrian friendly, with greater business and residential densities around the Central Business District. South Tempe is generally characterized by lower density, higher income, and an established commute pattern. A shorter modern streetcar project will carry the significant number of trips generated within downtown Tempe as well as those trips currently using local bus service on Mill Avenue. BRT is a good solution for those looking to travel longer distances along Rural Road. It is anticipated that both will connect to the regional Central Phoenix/East Valley light rail line providing greater reach for all trip types. Alternatives Analysis Process A two-tiered alternatives development process was used to evaluate the Tempe South corridor. The first phase (Tier 1) included a mostly qualitative evaluation that analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of a wide range of potential alternatives to address the transportation needs of the corridor. Mode options included BRT, LRT, modern streetcar, and commuter rail. Route options included Rural Road, Mill Avenue, McClintock Drive, Kyrene Road, and the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR). The Tier 2 evaluation was a more rigorous screening process involving five alternatives. This included three BRT options; one adjacent to the UPRR, and the others along Mill Avenue/Kyrene Road and Rural Road; one LRT alternative along Rural Road and a modern streetcar alternative along Mill Avenue. An evaluation matrix presenting the Tier 2 criteria by alternative is included in Table 1 below. Table 1: Summary of Tier 2 Evaluation Evaluation Criteria UPRR Mill Mill Rural Rural BRT Kyrene BRT Streetcar LRT BRT Rider benefits O O Traffic issues O O O Connectivity to downtown Tempe, ASU and West O + Chandler Population served O + O Environmental issues O Urban design elements O O + + O General impact to community O O O --- O Community support O O Land use --- O O + O Economic development potential --- O + O O Design and constructability issues O + O Capital costs (1) O Operating costs (1) N/A N/A O O +

24 METRO Board of Directors Memo November 10, 2010 Page 3 Ratings: + = Alternative would have greater benefit (or lesser adverse impact) related to the other alternatives. O = Alternative would not produce a significant change from the future no-build conditions or would have a moderate impact relative to the other alternatives. --- = Alternative would have a lesser benefit (or greater adverse impact) than the other alternatives. (1) It is assumed that operating and capital funding to support the Rural Road BRT alternative have been delayed beyond funding availability identified in the RTP. Three of the five alternatives were eliminated from consideration. Below is a summary, by alternative, that include significant reasons as to why each alternative was eliminated. UPRR BRT This alternative, while achieving reasonable rider benefits suffered from a lack of community support. Additionally, this alternative was a relatively expensive option, largely due to the cost to build pedestrian and commuter access to an isolated rail line. And, finally, the UPRR BRT had the potential to cause conflict with future commuter rail planning efforts. Mill/Kyrene BRT This option was eliminated due to a lack of existing transit customers south of Baseline. It was thought that a major capital investment was premature in a corridor without an existing local transit market. Rural Road LRT This alternative was removed from consideration given the cost and neighborhood impacts of constructing an overpass at the UPRR crossing between Broadway and Apache Blvd. In addition, to maintain the traffic carrying capacity of Rural Road, significant widening would be required causing further impacts to the neighborhoods adjacent to Rural Road. The Tier 2 evaluation, coupled with extensive public comment, resulted in the advancement of two alternatives: a 2.6-mile modern streetcar on Mill Avenue; and a 12-mile BRT on Rural Road. Although not evaluated in Tier 2 because it was beyond the study s scope, commuter rail using the UPRR tracks was also recommended for further study given the amount of support identified for commuter rail through the stakeholder process. Mill Avenue Modern Streetcar The modern streetcar project would be located on Mill Avenue between Southern Avenue and downtown Tempe. A map of this project is included in Figure 2, with a close-up of the downtown alignment shown in Figure 3. Initially, the study also included analysis of a segment on Southern Avenue between Mill Avenue and Rural Road, however due to financial constraints the mile segment to Rural Road was deferred until additional funding could be pursued. Southern Avenue is important since it provides a link to Tempe community facilities at Rural Road and Southern Avenue; creates an opportunity for a park-and-ride; and provides a direct connection to existing local bus service and future regional BRT service on Rural Road. Daily ridership estimates for the modern streetcar project are 1,100 1,600 in the opening year. This ridership forecast assumes service levels comparable to existing light rail, but does not include special event ridership. It also assumes a reconfigured background bus network optimized to serve the modern streetcar alternative. It is

25 METRO Board of Directors Memo November 10, 2010 Page 4 anticipated that changes in future land use and economic development will enhance these ridership figures in the future. For example, daily ridership on the 1.4-mile South Lake Union modern streetcar in Seattle has increased from 900 to nearly 2,500 since opening in 2008, largely due to changes in land use and economic development. Table 2 illustrates forecasted ridership on the modern streetcar line. Table 2: Ridership on the Mill Avenue Modern Streetcar Daily Ridership Estimates Mill Modern Streetcar (2015) (1) Average daily ridership 1,100-1,600 Riders per mile (1) 2015 represents the MAG socio-economic forecasts nearest to Mill Modern Streetcar opening day. The 2.6-mile Mill Avenue modern streetcar project includes the following benefits: Increases transit ridership in the corridor; Connects neighborhoods to downtown Tempe; Connects residents to neighborhood services; Encourages redevelopment of underutilized parcels; Encourages reinvestment in neighborhoods; Promotes livable city and green initiatives; Provides seamless connection to LRT; Supports ASU travel demand; and Improves service for special events. Downtown Alignment Alternatives Mill Avenue Modern Streetcar As a result of additional community feedback, a subsequent evaluation of modern streetcar alignment options was conducted within downtown Tempe. Three circulation options were evaluated north of University Drive; a double track alignment on Mill Avenue, a double track alignment on Ash Avenue, and a one-way loop northbound on Mill Avenue, westbound on Rio Salado Parkway, southbound on Ash Avenue and eastbound on University Drive. The evaluation criteria included ridership, land use, economic development, capital and operating costs, traffic impacts, utilities, special events, and parking. Table 3 below compares and contrasts how well each downtown alignment alternative meets important community goals. Table 3: Evaluation of Downtown Alignment Alternatives Evaluation Criteria Mill Avenue Ash Avenue Mill / Ash One- Double Track Double Track Way Loop Utility Avoidance Capital Costs - O + Ease / Flexibility of Operations O + + Access to Maintenance Yard Economic Development Potential O + O Passenger Way-Finding + + O Impact to Existing Streetscape Construction Disruption Proximity to Neighborhoods O + +

26 METRO Board of Directors Memo November 10, 2010 Page 5 Ratings: + = Alternative would have greater benefit (or lesser adverse impact) related to the other alternatives. O = Alternative would not produce a significant change from the future no-build conditions or would have a moderate impact relative to the other alternatives = Alternative would have a lesser benefit (or greater adverse impact) than the other alternatives. Rural Road Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) In an the effort to balance the regional Transit Life Cycle Program (TLCP), funding for the Tempe and Chandler portion of the Rural Road BRT has been delayed beyond the 2026 funding program in the RTP. However, the Alternatives Analysis recommends this project for future implementation. The Rural Road BRT project includes: 10 minute peak service; all day service; traffic signal priority, reserved bus and right turn lanes between Baseline Road and University Drive; a limited number of stops; and bus stop improvements. Please refer to Figure 4 for a map of this alternative. The BRT has a forecasted daily ridership of 5,200-5,700 in 2030; please refer to Table 4 below for riders per mile. The 12-mile Rural Road BRT project has the following benefits: Enhances bus service levels; Relieves Rural Road bus overcrowding; Improves bus operating speeds in the corridor; Attracts a significant number of new transit riders; Provides seamless connections to LRT and other transit modes; and Better serves ASU, downtown Tempe, and Chandler Fashion Mall travel destinations. Table 4: Forecasted ridership on Rural Road BRT Daily Ridership Estimates Rural Road BRT (2030) Average daily ridership 5,200-5,700 Riders per mile Public & Agency Process METRO prepared a Public Involvement Plan for the study. The overall goal was to inform the residents, stakeholder interest groups, and involved agencies about the Tempe South Corridor Study and to present the alternatives and issues for public and agency review. During the course of the study, the public involvement team conducted ten public meetings with 446 people attending; over 47 presentations to advisory committees, neighborhood associations and civic organizations; and continuous updates via website, s, newsletters and fact sheets. Through the public outreach program, a general theme started to emerge in the feedback from the community. It centered on a few main points: Provide enhanced mobility options connecting to the regional transit system, accommodating for the current and future travel demand that exists within the study area; Connect residents and employment to the destination points within their community and to other regional centers; and

27 METRO Board of Directors Memo November 10, 2010 Page 6 Promote integration of fixed guideway and land use planning to support sustainability and livable community initiatives as well as economic development. Several community organizations, businesses, and residents have supported the Alternatives Analysis study recommendations. To date, the project has received 34 comments in support of the streetcar including letters of support from the following community organizations: Downtown Tempe Community Arizona State University Tempe Convention and Visitors Bureau Tempe Chamber of Commerce Tempe Union High School District The study recommendations have also received official endorsements from local and regional governing bodies, including: Tempe Transportation Commission Tempe South Corridor Study Ad Hoc Advisory Committee MAG Transit Committee Chandler Transportation Commission Tempe City Council Project Schedule Table 5 below outlines the project schedule for both the local/regional and federal processes. Table 5: Tempe South Project Schedule Process / Approval Timeline Local / Regional Approvals - Tempe City Council October 21, METRO Board (acceptance of study results only) November 17, Chandler City Council November 18, MAG Regional Council December 8, 2010 Project Design / Refinement Fall 2010 Winter 2013 Right-of-way/Utilities/Construction Spring 2013 Winter 2016 Project Opening Late 2016 Federal Environmental Assessment Spring 2011 Small Starts Project Development (PD) Process - Preparation of application to enter PD Fall 2010 Spring Submission of PD application Spring Anticipated entry into PD Fall Anticipated Project Construction Grant Agreement Early 2013

28 METRO Board of Directors Memo November 10, 2010 Page 7 FISCAL IMPACT The TLCP includes $162 million, in year of expenditure (YOE) dollars, for the development of the 2.6-mile modern streetcar project. Cost estimates for the project show a low estimate of $151.0 and a high estimate of $160.4 million in YOE dollars. Funding is programmed through a combination of regional Public Transportation Funds (PTF) and federal funding (both FTA Section 5309/Small Starts and CMAQ). Operating expenses are estimated at $3.6 million in 2017 dollars for the modern streetcar and will be paid from fares and the Tempe Transit Fund. Table 6 below outlines funding sources for the modern streetcar project. Table 6: Capital Funding Sources for Mill Avenue Modern Streetcar (YOE$ s millions) Funding Source Amount Public Transportation Fund (PTF) $ Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) $44.2 FTA Section 5339 / 5309 Small Starts $75.0 Total $151.0 $160.4 The TLCP does not currently include funding or a scheduled completion date for the Rural Road BRT project. Capital costs for this project are estimated to be $60 - $65 million in 2010 dollars. The annual Rural Road BRT operating cost is estimated to be $3 - $3.5 million in 2010 dollars, which includes the costs of BRT and Route 72. Both projects are viable and should be implemented as funding permits. The City of Tempe and its stakeholders are desirous of the BRT being advancing through implementation as soon as funds could be identified. Capital funding for high capacity transit in the Tempe South corridor remains within the rail portion of the TLCP and is scheduled for completion in RAIL MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION On November 3, 2010, the Rail Management Committee (RMC) recommended (Glendale voted no) that the Board accept staff recommendations for the Tempe South Alternatives Analysis. RECOMMENDATION Staff is requesting that the Board accept the following METRO staff recommendations for the Tempe South Alternatives Analysis: 1. A Locally Preferred Alternative for the Tempe South project, including a modern streetcar on a Mill Avenue alignment with a one-way loop in downtown Tempe; 2. Inclusion of a potential future phase of modern streetcar east along Southern Avenue to Rural Road as an Illustrative Transit Corridor in the MAG RTP; 3. Future consideration for increased service levels and capital improvements for Rural Road BRT, per the description provided herein, through the regional transportation system planning process;

29 METRO Board of Directors Memo November 10, 2010 Page 8 4. Future consideration for high capacity transit needs north of downtown Tempe along Rio Salado Parkway and south of Southern Avenue along Rural Road to the vicinity of Chandler Boulevard through the regional transportation system planning process; and 5. Further consideration of commuter rail along the Tempe Branch of the Union Pacific Railroad, through the regional transportation system planning process, and pending results from the Arizona Department of Transportation s Phoenix-Tucson Intercity Rail Alternatives Analysis.

30 METRO Board of Directors Memo November 10, 2010 Page 9 Figure 1: Travel Markets in Tempe South Study Area

31 METRO Board of Directors Memo November 10, 2010 Page 10 Figure 2: Proposed Tempe South Locally Preferred Alternative

32 METRO Board of Directors Memo November 10, 2010 Page 11 Figure 3: Downtown Mill Avenue / Ash Avenue Loop Alternative

33 METRO Board of Directors Memo November 10, 2010 Page 12 Figure 4: Proposed Rural Road Bus Rapid Transit Alternative (Unfunded)