The definitive source of actionable intelligence on hedge fund law and regulation. Reclamation Rights
|
|
- Harold Marsh
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The definitive source of CLAIMS TRADING How Claim Traders Can Pursue Reclamation and Administrative Expense Claims in Retail and Other Insolvencies By Darius J. Goldman, Matthew W. Olsen and Jessica P. Chue Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP As a result of changing consumer spending habits, numerous retailers including Sports Authority, Pacific Sunware, Aeropostale and, most recently, American Apparel have been forced to close down their storefronts or enter into bankruptcy. Others, such as Macy s, Sears, J.Crew and Toys-R-Us, are also reaching distressed levels. While these retail bankruptcies have negative implications for landlords, tenants and other stakeholders, they may offer great opportunities for claim traders in the secondary distressed trading market. The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Customer Protection Act of 2005 (2005 Amendment) sought to strengthen vendor-creditor rights under the federal bankruptcy law through two key provisions: Federal Reclamation, which allows a vendor to reclaim goods delivered during the 45 days before the bankruptcy filing date (Petition Date); and Reclamation Administrative Expense Priority, which created the right to assert an administrative priority claim for goods received by the debtor during the 20 days prior to the Petition Date. Armed with the proper tools, a claims trader could find value in the recent influx of retail bankruptcies. This article outlines how a vendor-creditor s claim may qualify for reclamation or administrative expense priority under the 2005 Amendment. For additional insight from Goldman and Chue, see What the LSTA s Revised Delayed Compensation Requirements Mean for Loans Trading on Par/Near Par Documents (Oct. 27, 2016). For more on claims trading from Goldman, see How Hedge Fund Claim Traders Can Protect Their Interests in the Visa/MasterCard Litigation (Jun. 14, 2016); and What Hedge Fund Claim Traders Need to Know About the Visa/MasterCard Settlement (Jun. 25, 2015). Reclamation Rights Under Section 546(c) of the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 (Bankruptcy Code),[1] a trade vendor (Vendor) has the right to recover unpaid physical goods sold to an insolvent tradecustomer (Debtor). Reclamation rights have always existed under state law, and the Bankruptcy Code recognizes the validity of such state laws. Upon the occurrence of a bankruptcy filing, however, Section 546(c) of the Bankruptcy Code serves as the exclusive remedy for a Vendor to recover possession of its goods from an insolvent Debtor. This means that a Vendor cannot rely on typical common law provisions such as Section 2-702(2) of the Uniform Commercial Code[2] (UCC), a state court replevin action[3] or other forms of self-help activities and must affirmatively prove all elements of its reclamation claim under the federal Bankruptcy Code. Elements of a Federal Reclamation Rights Claim To successfully assert a right of reclamation under Section 546(c)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code (Reclamation Rights), a Vendor must affirmatively prove the following statutory requirements by a preponderance of the evidence: 1. The Debtor was insolvent at the time it received the goods. The Debtor must be insolvent, as defined under 101(32) of the Bankruptcy Code, which states that the sum of [the Debtor s] debts is greater than all of such [Debtor s] property, at a fair valuation, exclusive of certain exempted property. Insolvency is determined by using a balance sheet test, which could lead to different results depending on which method is used. While it may be difficult (and possibly expensive) to
2 prove that a Debtor was actually insolvent at the time it received goods, most Debtors in bankruptcy are, in fact, insolvent, and that is not usually a disputed issue. 2. The goods were sold in the ordinary course of the Vendor s business. Courts generally use the UCC s definition of goods, which is defined, in relevant part, as all things (including specially manufactured goods) [that] are movable at the time of identification to the contract for sale other than the money in which the price is to be paid, investment securities and things in action. [4] 3. The Debtor received the goods within 45 days of bankruptcy. Courts generally use the UCC s definition of receipt, which is defined as taking physical possession. [5] Therefore, receipt of goods occurs when the Debtor takes physical possession of them or when the Debtor takes constructive possession through physical possession of the goods by its agent.[6] While this is generally a straightforward determination, it could be more difficult if the Vendor used a thirdparty common carrier, in which case, the Vendor may have difficulty providing evidence of actual delivery, especially if the Vendor s records differ from those of the Debtor. Obtaining a written receipt of that delivery from the Debtor or its agent is critical to proving that this element has been met. 4. The Vendor made a timely written reclamation demand. The Vendor must make a written demand for reclamation within 45 days of the Debtor s receipt of the goods. However, if the Debtor files for bankruptcy within this 45-day period, the Vendor is given an additional 20 days from the Petition Date within which to make the reclamation demand, thereby potentially giving the Vendor 65 days to recover its goods.[7] The demand must be made by the Vendor; a third party, such as an assignee or bailee of the Vendor, cannot make the demand on behalf of the Vendor.[8] The Bankruptcy Code does not specify at what point in time a reclamation demand is deemed to be made. Most courts apply the dispatch rule, under which a reclamation demand is made when it is sent by the Vendor, provided that the method of communication is commercially reasonable.[9] A minority of courts apply the receipt rule, under which a reclamation demand is made when it is received by the Debtor. Of note, the dispatch rule is more favorable to Vendors as it deems the reclamation demand to have been made at an earlier date. Although not as exacting as the four elements summarized above, the Vendor must also satisfy the following implicit requirements: 1. the goods are still in the Debtor s possession on the later of the Petition Date or reclamation demand date;[10] 2. the goods are identifiable on the later of the Petition Date or reclamation demand date and have not been incorporated into another product;[11] and 3. the Debtor has not sold the goods to another buyer in good faith. Indeed, a Vendor s right to recover its goods is subject to the right of other parties, particularly buyers in the ordinary course and good faith purchasers of the Debtor. As amended by the 2005 Amendment, Section 546(c) of the Bankruptcy Code provides that a Vendor s Reclamation Rights are subject to the prior rights of a holder of a security interest in such goods or the proceeds thereof. Therefore, to the extent one or more secured creditors of the Debtor have a blanket lien on all the Debtor s assets, including inventory, the Vendor s Reclamation Rights under Section 546(c) are subject, and subordinate, to the rights of those secured creditors. In fact, many courts take the viewpoint that the value of the specific good the Vendor seeks to reclaim must exceed the value of the Debtor s total secured indebtedness, which could also include post-petition debtor-in-possession financing. Given the prevalence of asset-based lending and other forms of commercial lending in the retail sector, this exception to Section 546(c) may make it difficult for a Vendor to exercise its Reclamation Rights. Finally, many Vendors may have little incentive to reclaim goods (for instance, if the goods are specific to the Debtor, if they are seasonal or if they have significantly lower resale value
3 once reclaimed) and will often prefer to receive cash as bargained. In some cases, where the goods subject to valid reclamation demands are essential to the Debtor s business, the Debtor may seek authority from the bankruptcy court to pay for the goods in cash, resulting in immediate and full payment to the Vendor without waiting for confirmation of a plan and the ordinary post-confirmation payment of claims.[12] Given the procedural shortcomings attendant to Reclamation Rights, more typically, Vendors may find that utilizing administrative expense priority as set forth in Section 503(b)(9) of the Bankruptcy Code, when applicable, offers a much better remedy when compared against reclamation. 503(b)(9) Administrative Expense Claims Within a Vendor s general Reclamation Rights, lies a subcategory under Section 503(b)(9) of the Bankruptcy Code that grants the Vendor an administrative priority expense (Admin Claim) for the value of goods received by the Debtor within 20 days prior to the Petition Date. This alternative remedy is available to Vendors of goods regardless of whether they meet the requirements of reclamation or fail to assert their Reclamation Rights. The effect of Section 503(b)(9) is to elevate the priority of a Vendor s claim for goods delivered within the 20-day period to an administrative expense priority claim from a non-priority general unsecured claim. Debtors are generally required to provide for the payment of all Admin Claims in full, in cash, on the effective date of their proposed chapter 11 plan of reorganization in order to obtain confirmation of the plan by the court.[13] In contrast, general unsecured creditors have no assurance of a recovery in chapter 11, and their claims typically receive only a fraction of the face amount in distributions. Unlike a Vendor s Reclamation Rights asserted under Section 546(c) of the Bankruptcy Code, Admin Claims are not reduced by a secured creditor s floating lien on the Debtor s existing and after-acquired inventory (provided a chapter 11 plan is confirmed).[14] Therefore, Admin Claims are often considered to be more valuable than Reclamation Rights under Section 546(c) of the Bankruptcy Code, even though the look-back period for Reclamation Rights is 25 days longer than for Admin Claims under Section 503(b)(9). Vendors must satisfy the following requirements to qualify for Section 503(b)(9) treatment: 1. The claim must apply only for goods as defined by Section 2-105(1) of the UCC. Services furnished to the Debtor do not qualify. 2. The goods must be sold to the Debtor in the ordinary course of the Debtor s business (in contrast to reclamation, which requires the goods to be sold in the ordinary course of the Vendor s business). 3. The goods must be received by the Debtor within 20 days prior to the date of commencement of the bankruptcy. In many cases, application of Section 503(b)(9) converts a substantial amount of a Debtor s trade claims from general unsecured claims receiving only partial recoveries to Admin Claims entitled to full payment under a plan. For claim traders, Admin Claims are highly sought after because they are likely to receive a full cash payment for these goods and must be paid in full in cash by the effective date of the plan of reorganization as a condition to confirmation. While an Admin Claim still has priority, however, it may not be entitled to full payment to the extent the Debtor is unable to confirm a plan and is forced to liquidate. Furthermore, because the Bankruptcy Code does not require immediate payment of Admin Claims, in most cases, Vendors holding these claims must wait until the plan effective date (or later) to receive payment. If the Debtor defers payment of Admin Claims and incurs excessive expenses including professional fees (which are also entitled to administrative priority) during the course of the bankruptcy case, there is a greater risk that the Debtor will be administratively insolvent. In that case, the other
4 administrative expenses of equal priority will be paid on a pro rata basis under 100 percent. An important consideration for claim traders is that the right to an Admin Claim is not automatic. Instead, a Vendor s Admin Claim will only be allowed after notice and hearing, and the Debtor will likely dispute the merits of the Vendor s claim (e.g., the value of the goods, the date of receipt and whether the goods were sold in the ordinary course of business). As with a Vendor s assertion of Reclamation Rights under Section 546(c) of the Bankruptcy Code, it is critical that the Vendor obtain written documentation confirming the delivery dates of its delivered goods. Thus, while Section 503(b)(9) provides Vendors with a useful tool in a retail bankruptcy case, it is not entirely without cost to file, prove and defend the Admin Claim. This raises the need for proper legal diligence and review of a purported Admin Claim prior to acquisition thereof. Conclusion Vendors regularly supply goods on credit to their customers, but as retailers increasingly face chapter 11, Vendors must understand their options under the Bankruptcy Code to mitigate the risk of non-payment. Although the 2005 Amendment provided Vendors with greater protections under the Bankruptcy Code, the rules are not without their intricacies and complications. To protect their rights, Vendors and claim traders must be knowledgeable of applicable bankruptcy protections, their rules and their shortcomings, so they may properly exercise and assess the rights of a Vendor against a retailer in bankruptcy. Claim traders should engage legal counsel familiar with not only the intricacies of the Bankruptcy Code, but also their practical application when diligencing Reclamation and Admin Claims for purchase. Similarly, any transfer documentation should be carefully negotiated to identify and carve out these risks so that the Vendor-claim seller bears the burden of proper categorization. Darius J. Goldman is head of Katten s distressed debt and claims trading practice. Goldman provides transactional guidance to clients who originate, restructure and invest in or trade distressed assets in both domestic and foreign jurisdictions. He represents financial institutions, hedge funds and sophisticated investors engaged in the purchase and sale of bank debt, trade claims, private securities and other investments in companies undergoing financial distress and has settled countless transactions for the transfer of secured, administrative expense, general unsecured and customer claims. Matthew W. Olsen is a partner in Katten s Insolvency and Restructuring practice and represents secured and unsecured lenders, municipal bond issuers and investors, asset purchasers, distressed debt investors and intellectual property licensors and licensees in all aspects of bankruptcy proceedings and workouts, including a broad range of transactional and litigation matters. His experience covers a wide array of industries with an emphasis on manufacturing, real estate, fashion and retail, entertainment and media and municipal finance. Jessica Chue is a senior associate in Katten s distressed debt and claims trading practice. [1] 11 U.S.C. 101 et seq. [2] Section of the UCC states that Where the seller discovers that the buyer has received goods on credit while insolvent he may reclaim the goods upon demand made within ten days after the receipt, but if misrepresentation of solvency has been made to the particular seller in writing within three months before delivery the ten day limitation does not apply. Except as provided in this subsection the seller may not base a right to reclaim goods on the buyer s fraudulent or innocent misrepresentation of solvency or of intent to pay. [3] A replevin action is an action seeking return of personal property wrongfully taken or held by the defendant. [4] UCC 2-105(1) [5] UCC 2-103(1)(c) [6] See Montello Oil Corp. v. Marin Motor Oil, Inc. (In re Marin Motor Oil, Co.), 740 F.2d 220, (3d Cir. 1984).
5 [7] However, in cases where the 45-day period following the Debtor s receipt of goods would expire later than 20 days after the Petition Date, the more prudent approach is to assume that the reclamation demand still must be made within 20 days after the Petition Date. [8] See Oakland Gin Co., Inc. v. Marlow (In re Julien Co.), 44 F.3d 426, 432 n.4 (6th Cir. 1995). [9] See In re Marin Motor Oil, Co., 740 F.2d at 228. [10] See, e.g., In re Adventist Living Ctrs., Inc., 52 F.3d 159, 163 (7th Cir. 1995); In re Pester Refining Co., 964 F.2d 842, 845 (8th Cir. 1992); In re Rawson Food Serv., Inc., 846 F.2d 1343, 1347 (11th Cir. 1988) [11] See Galey & Lord Inc. v. Arley Corp. (In re Arlco, Inc.), 239 B.R. 261, (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1999) (citing Party Packing Corp. v. Rosenberg (In re Landy Beef Co., Inc.), 30 B.R. 19, 21 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1983)). [12] One (non-retail) example of where such reclamations procedures were approved was in the American Airlines chapter 11 cases, in which the court authorized the debtors to elect whether to return goods subject to reclamation or pay for them in cash. See In re AMR Corp., et al. (Bankr. S.D.N.Y, Chapter 11 Case No (SHL) (Jointly Administered)) (ECF Doc. Nos. 283 and 3388). [13] 11 U.S.C 1129(a)(9)(A). [14] In the event the Debtor is unable to confirm a plan of reorganization and its case is converted to a liquidation under chapter 7, administrative expense claims have a diminished priority and would be subject to the prior rights of secured creditors. Thus, when a Debtor is unable to pay even its administrative expense claims, let alone its general unsecured claims, it is referred to as being administratively insolvent.
Reclamation Rights in Bankruptcy What Every Credit Manager Needs to Know By: Schuyler G. Carroll, Esq. & George Angelich, Esq.
Reclamation Rights in Bankruptcy What Every Credit Manager Needs to Know By: Schuyler G. Carroll, Esq. & George Angelich, Esq. Abstract Vendors of goods regularly extend business credit to customers. However,
More informationDelaware Bankruptcy Court Creates Vendor-Friendly Forum by Preserving Reclamation Rights in the Face of DIP Lenders Liens
Delaware Bankruptcy Court Creates Vendor-Friendly Forum by Preserving Reclamation Rights in the Face of DIP Lenders Liens 2017 Volume IX No. 12 Delaware Bankruptcy Court Creates Vendor-Friendly Forum by
More informationTHE EFFECT OF THE 2005 BANKRUPTCY CODE AMENDMENTS ON PERSONAL PROPERTY SECURED TRANSACTIONS IN BUSINESS CASES
THE EFFECT OF THE 2005 BANKRUPTCY CODE AMENDMENTS ON PERSONAL PROPERTY SECURED TRANSACTIONS IN BUSINESS CASES Gabriel R. Safar and Edwin E. Smith Bingham McCutchen LLP November 8, 2005 The Bankruptcy Abuse
More informationCREDITORS RIGHTS A SHIPMAN & GOODWIN ALERT
CREDITORS RIGHTS A SHIPMAN & GOODWIN ALERT February 8, 2018 Supplier Strategies for the Financially Distressed Buyer Authors: Eric S. Goldstein (860) 251-5059 egoldstein@goodwin.com Latonia C. Williams
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship 1993 From the Bankruptcy Courts: Eighth Circuit Protects Seller's Reclamation Rights
More informationClaims Traders Beware: More Risk Than You Bargained For!
Claims Traders Beware: More Risk Than You Bargained For! Article contributed by Lawrence V. Gelber, David J. Karp, and Jamie Powell Schwartz of Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP Introduction 1 Bankruptcy claims
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: MARK RICHARD LIPPOLD, Debtor. 1 FOR PUBLICATION Chapter 7 Case No. 11-12300 (MG) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
John D. Fiero (CA Bar No. ) Kenneth H. Brown (CA Bar No. 00) Miriam Khatiblou (CA Bar No. ) Teddy M. Kapur (CA Bar No. ) 0 California Street, th Floor San Francisco, California -00 Telephone: /-000 Facsimile:
More informationSigned January 17, 2019 United States Bankruptcy Judge
Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 865 Filed 01/17/19 Entered 01/17/19 16:51:55 Page 1 of 7 The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described. Signed January 17, 2019
More informationRe: Issue Number: (Bankruptcy Credit Event in respect of Sears Roebuck Acceptance Corporation)
To: DC Secretary Re: Issue Number: 2018101502 (Bankruptcy Credit Event in respect of Sears Roebuck Acceptance Corporation) Date: November 13, 2018 Pursuant to Rule 3.3(d) of the 2018 ISDA Credit Derivatives
More informationrdd Doc 162 Filed 05/12/14 Entered 05/12/14 18:17:14 Main Document Pg 1 of 9
Pg 1 of 9 David S. Heller Paul E. Harner Matthew L. Warren (appearing pro hac vice) LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 885 Third Avenue New York, New York 10022-4834 Telephone: (212) 906-1200 Facsimile: (212) 751-4864
More informationGetting to the Front of the Line What to Do When Your Debtor Declares Bankruptcy
Getting to the Front of the Line What to Do When Your Debtor Declares Bankruptcy August 22, 2013 All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others George Orwell, Animal Farm Edward H.
More informationCase KG Doc 396 Filed 10/24/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Chapter 11 : : : :
Case 18-11736-KG Doc 396 Filed 10/24/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ----------------------------------------------------------x In re HERITAGE HOME GROUP
More informationCredit Research Foundation Education Brief
Credit Research Foundation Education Brief Trade Credit Insurance as Protection from Bankruptcy Preference Risk: Negotiating for the Broadest Coverage By: Bruce S. Nathan, Esq., Mark Regenhardt and James
More informationMAKE-WHOLE CLAIMS AND BANKRUPTCY POLICY
MAKE-WHOLE CLAIMS AND BANKRUPTCY POLICY Douglas P. Bartner and Robert A. Britton* Loan agreements and bond indentures frequently contain make-whole or yield maintenance provisions that are designed to
More informationCase ast Doc 673 Filed 01/22/18 Entered 01/22/18 17:46:18
Case 8-14-70593-ast Doc 673 Filed 01/22/18 Entered 01/22/18 17:46:18 GARFUNKEL WILD, P.C. 111 Great Neck Road Great Neck, New York 11021 Telephone: (516) 393-2200 Fax: (516) 466-5964 Burton S. Weston Adam
More informationalg Doc 4468 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:17:20 Main Document Pg 1 of 17. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT Hearing Date: August 5, 2013
Pg 1 of 17 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT Hearing Date: August 5, 2013 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Hearing Time: 11:00 a.m. ------------------------------------------------------x : In re : Chapter 11
More informationThe Webinar Will Begin Shortly
From Negotiated Reorganization to Pre- Packaged Bankruptcy: What Creditors Need to Know The Webinar Will Begin Shortly Presented by Stephen Williamson, Esq. Montgomery Barnett, L.L.P. New Orleans, LA Samuel
More informationCase GLT Doc 577 Filed 06/23/17 Entered 06/23/17 14:22:20 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 8
Document Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA In re: Case No. 17-22045 (GLT rue21, inc., et al., 1 Chapter 11 Debtors. (Jointly Administered Hearing
More informationFIRST LIEN/SECOND LIEN INTERCREDITOR AGREEMENTS AND RELATED ISSUES
FIRST LIEN/SECOND LIEN INTERCREDITOR AGREEMENTS AND RELATED ISSUES An Introduction to the ABA Model Intercreditor Agreement Presented by: Michael S. Himmel, Chapman and Cutler LLP ABA Business Law Section
More informationCase: SDB Doc#:26 Filed:02/28/18 Entered:02/28/18 16:24:33 Page:1 of 7
Case:18-10274-SDB Doc#:26 Filed:02/28/18 Entered:02/28/18 16:24:33 Page:1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION In re: Chapter 11 FIBRANT, LLC,
More informationHow To Negotiate A Ch. 11 Plan Support Agreement
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com How To Negotiate A Ch. 11 Plan Support Agreement Law360,
More informationDefault Remedies under Subscription Credit Facilities: Guide to the Foreclosure Process
Default Remedies under Subscription Credit Facilities: Guide to the Foreclosure Process Kiel Bowen Sean Scott Alexander Righi Although the growing market for subscriptionbacked credit facilities (each,
More informationCase MFW Doc 1321 Filed 04/21/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.
Case 16-10527-MFW Doc 1321 Filed 04/21/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: SPORTS AUTHORITY HOLDINGS, INC., et al., 1 Debtors. Chapter 11 Case No. 16-10527
More informationCase hdh11 Doc 223 Filed 12/26/17 Entered 12/26/17 15:19:42 Page 1 of 163
Case 17-33964-hdh11 Doc 223 Filed 12/26/17 Entered 12/26/17 15:19:42 Page 1 of 163 Gregory G. Hesse (Texas Bar No. 09549419) HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP 1445 Ross Avenue Suite 3700 Dallas, Texas 75209 Telephone:
More informationPrinciples of Business Credit
Principles of Business Credit National Education Department 8840 Columbia 100 Parkway, Columbia, MD 21045-2158 Fax: 410-740-5574 Email: education_info@nacm.org Eighth Edition Questions for Discussion
More informationCase PJW Doc 762 Filed 07/29/13 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 13-10061-PJW Doc 762 Filed 07/29/13 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ------------------------------------------------------x In re : Chapter 11 : Penson
More informationThis Webcast Will Begin Shortly
Page 1 This Webcast Will Begin Shortly If you have any technical problems with the Webcast or the streaming audio, please contact us via email at: accwebcast@commpartners.com Thank You! Page 2 DOING BUSINESS
More informationNo Surcharge for You: Third Circuit Rules That Section 506(c) Surcharge Is "Sharply Limited" January/February Lauren M. Buonome Mark G.
No Surcharge for You: Third Circuit Rules That Section 506(c) Surcharge Is "Sharply Limited" January/February 2014 Lauren M. Buonome Mark G. Douglas The ability to "surcharge" a secured creditor's collateral
More informationMEMORANDUM. Chairman John S.R. Issues Relating to Use of Repurchase Agreements by Mutual Funds. This memorandum presents a preliminary legal analysis
i L~ MEMORANDUM TO- FROM : RE : Chairman John S.R Green,~~ Edward F. General Counsel Lad Issues Relating to Use of Repurchase Agreements by Mutual Funds September 3, 1982 I. Introduction This memorandum
More informationREMINGTON OUTDOOR COMPANY, INC. (Exact name of company as specified in its charter)
REMINGTON OUTDOOR COMPANY, INC. (Exact name of company as specified in its charter) Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 870 Remington Drive P.O. Box 1776 Madison, North
More informationBankruptcy Litigation Services
Bankruptcy Litigation Services Providing sophisticated support for complex bankruptcy litigation matters Deloitte CRG Deloitte Transactions and Business Analytics LLP Bankruptcy-related litigation presents
More informationPrinciples of Business Credit
Principles of Business Credit National Education Department 8840 Columbia 100 Parkway, Columbia, MD 21045-2158 Fax: 410-740-5574 Email: education_info@nacm.org Eighth Edition UCC ARTICLE 2 SALES OFFER
More informationmg Doc 5285 Filed 10/04/13 Entered 10/04/13 16:34:28 Main Document Pg 1 of 7
Pg 1 of 7 STORCH AMINI & MUNVES PC 2 Grand Central Tower, 25 th Floor 140 East 45 th Street New York, New York 10017 Tel. (212 490-4100 Noam M. Besdin, Esq. nbesdin@samlegal.com Counsel for Simona Robinson
More informationCase Document 671 Filed in TXSB on 03/29/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Case 17-36709 Document 671 Filed in TXSB on 03/29/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION IN RE: Chapter 11 COBALT INTERNATIONAL ENERGY, CASE NO. 17-36709
More informationThe Agriprocessors Bankruptcy Can The Bankruptcy Trustee Recover Payments Made To Suppliers Within 90 Days of the Bankruptcy Filing?
The Agriprocessors Bankruptcy Can The Bankruptcy Trustee Recover Payments Made To Suppliers Within 90 Days of the Bankruptcy Filing? 2321 N. Loop Drive, Ste 200 Ames, Iowa 50010 www.calt.iastate.edu December
More informationIn re: : Case No (JMP) (Jointly Administered)
Hearing Date: August 9, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. (ET) Dennis F. Dunne Evan R. Fleck MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY & M c CLOY LLP 1 Chase Manhattan Plaza New York, NY 10005 Telephone: (212) 530-5000 Facsimile: (212)
More informationMaster Currency means the currency in which the Facility is principally denominated.
Standard Terms and Conditions for Par/Near Par Trade Confirmations (Published by The Loan Syndications and Trading Association, Inc. as of April 24, 2014, 2016) The following are the Standard Terms and
More informationThe Pervasive Problem Of Numerosity
Portfolio Media, Inc. 860 Broadway, 6 th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@portfoliomedia.com The Pervasive Problem Of Numerosity Law360,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re ) Chapter 11 ) SP NEWSPRINT HOLDINGS LLC, et al., ) Case No. 11-13649 (CSS) ) Debtors. ) Jointly Administered ) Hearing Date: February
More informationChapter 11 and CCAA. » A Cross-Border Comparison
Chapter 11 and CCAA» A Cross-Border Comparison TORONTO CALGARY VANCOUVER MONTRÉAL OTTAWA NEW YORK LONDON RIYADH/AL-KHOBAR* BAHRAIN BEIJING Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP *Associated Offices blakes.com Chapter
More informationWHO'S ON FIRST? NOTHING FUNNY ABOUT LIENS FOR LENDERS
WHO'S ON FIRST? NOTHING FUNNY ABOUT LIENS FOR LENDERS Banking, Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights Law Practice Group June 7, 2017 Author: Joseph M. Ammar Direct: (269) 226-8845 jammar@plunkettcooney.com Unlike
More informationCase 1:12-bk Doc 261 Filed 03/07/13 Entered 03/07/13 17:19:21 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 10
Document Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND ) Chapter 11 In re ) ) Case No. 12-10602 (WCH) PAWTUCKET ASPHALT CORP. et al. ) ) Jointly Administered Debtors. ) ) OBJECTION
More informationmew Doc 1341 Filed 09/10/17 Entered 09/10/17 12:53:00 Main Document Pg 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Pg 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------x In re Chapter 11 WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY LLC, et al., Case No. 17-10751
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Hearing Date and Time: October 11, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. Objection Deadline: October 3, 2006 at 4:00 p.m. JONES DAY 222 East 41st Street New York, New York 10017 Telephone: (212) 326-3939 Facsimile: (212)
More informationConstruing Substantial Contribution Under Section 503(b)(3)(D) May/June Jennifer L. Seidman
Construing Substantial Contribution Under Section 503(b)(3)(D) May/June 2012 Jennifer L. Seidman In keeping with the courts narrow construction of what constitutes substantial contribution in a chapter
More informationCase sgj11 Doc 910 Filed 03/26/15 Entered 03/26/15 16:49:11 Page 1 of 12
Case 14-34941-sgj11 Doc 910 Filed 03/26/15 Entered 03/26/15 16:49:11 Page 1 of 12 Aaron M. Kaufman TX Bar No. 24060067 COX SMITH MATTHEWS INCORPORATED 1201 Elm Street, Suite 3300 Dallas, Texas 75270 (214)
More informationWalter Energy, Inc. $50,000,000 Debtor-in-Possession Term Loan Facility Summary of Terms and Conditions
Walter Energy, Inc. $50,000,000 Debtor-in-Possession Term Loan Facility Summary of Terms and Conditions Borrower: Guarantors: Backstop Parties: DIP Agent: DIP Lenders: Walter Energy, Inc. (the Borrower
More informationTITLE LOAN AGREEMENT
Borrower(s): Name: Address: Motor Vehicle: Year Color Make TITLE LOAN AGREEMENT Lender: Drivers License Number VIN Title Certificate Number Model Date of Loan ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATE The cost of your credit
More informationCase Document 555 Filed in TXSB on 10/10/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Case 18-33836 Document 555 Filed in TXSB on 10/10/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION In re: NEIGHBORS LEGACY HOLDINGS, INC., et al., Debtors. 1 Chapter
More informationCayman Islands: Restructuring & Insolvency
The In-House Lawyer: Comparative Guides Cayman Islands: Restructuring & Insolvency inhouselawyer.co.uk /index.php/practice-areas/restructuring-insolvency/cayman-islands-restructuringinsolvency/ 5/3/2017
More informationAttorneys for Nortel Networks Inc.
Gary S. Lee (GL 6049) Karen Ostad (KO 5596) Dina Gielchinsky (DG 6054) LOVELLS 900 Third Avenue, 16th Floor New York, New York 10022 Tel. (212) 909-0600 Fax: (212) 909-0666 Hearing Date: January 28, 2004,
More informationCanada. Thornton Grout Finnigan LLP. 1 Overview. 2 Key Issues to Consider When the Company is in Financial Difficulties
Leanne M. Williams Thornton Grout Finnigan LLP Puya J. Fesharaki 1 Overview 1.1 Where would you place your jurisdiction on the spectrum of debtor to creditor-friendly jurisdictions? is a relatively creditor-friendly
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION --------------------------------------------------------------x In re Chapter 9 CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, Case No. 13-53846
More informationWhen Construction and Bankruptcy Converge
When Construction and Bankruptcy Converge by David W. Lannetti David W. Lannetti is a partner in the Norfolk office of Vandeventer Black LLP. He is chair of the firm s Bankruptcy Section and a member of
More informationmg Doc Filed 02/13/17 Entered 02/13/17 20:23:37 Main Document Pg 1 of 23. Attorneys for the Motors Liquidation Company GUC Trust
Pg 1 of 23 Attorneys for the Motors Liquidation CompanyGUC Trust et al. et al. Pg 2 of 23 Attorneys for the Motors Liquidation Company GUC Trust Pg 3 of 23 Pg 4 of 23 Pg 5 of 23 Pg 6 of 23 Motors Liquidation
More informationMotors Liquidation Company GUC Trust
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of report (Date of earliest event
More informationAnother Page In The Issuer-Bondholder Playbook
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Another Page In The Issuer-Bondholder Playbook
More informationCash Collateral Orders Revisited Following ResCap
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Cash Collateral Orders Revisited Following ResCap
More informationCase BLS Doc 131 Filed 05/24/18 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.
Case 18-11092-BLS Doc 131 Filed 05/24/18 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: RMH FRANCHISE HOLDINGS, INC., et al., 1 Debtors. Chapter 11 Case No. 18-11092
More informationExhibit D Liquidation Analysis
Case 14-10461-MFW Doc 16-4 Filed 03/03/14 Page 1 of 5 Exhibit D Liquidation Analysis Case 14-10461-MFW Doc 16-4 Filed 03/03/14 Page 2 of 5 Liquidation Analysis The Liquidation Analysis has been prepared
More informationCase AJC Doc 10 Filed 02/26/13 Page 1 of 7. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division
Case 13-13954-AJC Doc 10 Filed 02/26/13 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division www.flsb.uscourts.gov In re: BANAH INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. Case No. 13-13954-AJC
More informationCase Doc 169 Filed 10/08/18 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WINSTON-SALEM DIVISION
Case 18-50946 Doc 169 Filed 10/08/18 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WINSTON-SALEM DIVISION IN RE: PRODUCT QUEST MANUFACTURING, LLC, et al., 1 Chapter 11 Case
More informationAlert. Fifth Circuit Orders Mandatory Subordination of Contractual Guaranty Claims. June 5, 2015
Alert Fifth Circuit Orders Mandatory Subordination of Contractual Guaranty Claims June 5, 2015 A creditor s guaranty claim arising from equity investments in a debtor s affiliate should be treated the
More informationCase: SDB Doc#:13 Filed:02/23/18 Entered:02/23/18 20:43:28 Page:1 of 7
Case:18-10274-SDB Doc#:13 Filed:02/23/18 Entered:02/23/18 20:43:28 Page:1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION In re: Chapter 11 FIBRANT, LLC,
More informationNOTICE AND INSTRUCTION FORM 1
NOTICE AND INSTRUCTION FORM 1 to the Holders (the Pre-Petition Noteholders ) of the 10-1/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2022 (CUSIP Nos. 00214T AA 6 and U04695 AA 7) (the Subordinated Notes ) issued
More informationSelective Payment of Prepetition Claims in Chapter 11 Before Distributions to Creditors Generally
Selective Payment of Prepetition Claims in Chapter 11 Before Distributions to Creditors Generally 33 rd Annual Southeastern Bankruptcy Law Institute Atlanta, Georgia April 12-14, 2007 David Neier Winston
More informationTOWING & STORAGE LIENS. (Rev. 7/9/2015)
TOWING & STORAGE LIENS (Rev. 7/9/2015) 1 This explanation is designed to provide reasonably accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is provided to the members
More informationmg Doc 3836 Filed 05/28/13 Entered 05/28/13 10:24:28 Main Document Pg 1 of 11
Pg 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------X In re: RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL, LLC, et al. Case No. 12-12020 (MG) Chapter 11 Debtors. ----------------------------------------X
More informationA good working knowledge of the UCC is critical to your auction business.
A good working knowledge of the UCC is critical to your auction business. The Uniform Commercial Code ( UCC ), in conjunction with state specific laws, and your contracts, govern the rights and obligations
More informationCase nhl Doc 211 Filed 11/29/18 Entered 11/29/18 15:41:06
JAFFE RAITT HEUER & WEISS, P.C. Paul R. Hage, Esq. (pro hac vice motion pending) 27777 Franklin, Suite 2500 Southfield, Michigan 48034 Telephone: (248) 351-3000 phage@jaffelaw.com -and- RIKER DANZIG SCHERER
More informationExhibit 13 Creditors Committee Solicitation Letter
Case 15-44931-rfn11 Doc 537-9 Filed 03/18/16 Entered 03/18/16 15:54:23 Page 1 of 6 Exhibit 13 Creditors Committee Solicitation Letter Case 15-44931-rfn11 Doc 537-9 Filed 03/18/16 Entered 03/18/16 15:54:23
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Chapter 11
JEFFREY C. KRAUSE (Cal. State Bar #94053 Email: jkrause@stutman.com EVE H. KARASIK (Cal. State Bar #155356 Email: ekarasik@stutman.com GREGORY K. JONES (Cal. State Bar #153729 Email: gjones@stutman.com
More information11 USC 505. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see
TITLE 11 - BANKRUPTCY CHAPTER 5 - CREDITORS, THE DEBTOR, AND THE ESTATE SUBCHAPTER I - CREDITORS AND CLAIMS 505. Determination of tax liability (a) (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2) of this subsection,
More informationTHIS CAUSE came on for final hearing on August 19, 2009, upon the motion, dated July
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION In re: Case No.: 8:09-bk-16766-CPM GPS Industries, Inc., Chapter 11 Debtor. / FINAL ORDER (i) AUTHORIZING THE DEBTORS TO OBTAIN
More informationLIENS OUTSIDE ARTICLES 9 AND 8 OF THE UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE
Conflicting security interests in property has been a major source of litigation in the lending industry since common law times. With respect to real estate, early recording statutes went a long way towards
More informationCase 1:09-bk Doc 502 Filed 02/03/10 Entered 02/03/10 19:53:12 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 16
Document Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND In re: Chapter 11 UTGR, INC. d/b/a TWIN RIVER, et al., 1 Case No. 09-12418 (ANV Debtors. Jointly Administered
More informationCase Doc 21 Filed 10/04/18 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 18-12221 Doc 21 Filed 10/04/18 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) ATD CORPORATION, et al., 1 ) Case No. 18-12221 ( ) ) Debtors.
More informationManaging Contract and Counter-Party Risk in a Volatile Market
Managing Contract and Counter-Party Risk in a Volatile Market Webinar Sponsored by Grain Journal and National Grain and Feed Association March 2, 2011 David C. Barrett BARRETT, EASTERDAY, CUNNINGHAM &
More informationTesting the Limits of Lender Liability in Distressed-Loan Situations. July/August Debra K. Simpson Mark G. Douglas
Testing the Limits of Lender Liability in Distressed-Loan Situations July/August 2007 Debra K. Simpson Mark G. Douglas As has been well-publicized recently, businesses are increasingly turning to private
More informationCase KG Doc 327 Filed 05/21/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 18-10834-KG Doc 327 Filed 05/21/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: Chapter 11 VER TECHNOLOGIES HOLDCO LLC, et al., 1 Case No. 18-10834 (KG Debtors.
More informationCase KG Doc 576 Filed 07/16/18 Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 18-10834-KG Doc 576 Filed 07/16/18 Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: Chapter 11 VER TECHNOLOGIES HOLDCO LLC, et al., 1 Case No. 18-10834 (KG Debtors.
More informationANTICIPATING AND ADDRESSING CUSTOMER FINANCIAL DISTRESS, DEFAULT, AND BANKRUPTCY
ANTICIPATING AND ADDRESSING CUSTOMER FINANCIAL DISTRESS, DEFAULT, AND BANKRUPTCY The financial distress rippling through the economy has roiled the supply chain and left sellers of goods to face the significant
More informationIntercreditor Agreements After Momentive: When a Hindrance Is Not a Hindrance
Legal Update December 13, 2018 Intercreditor Agreements After Momentive: When a Hindrance Is Not a Hindrance Intercreditor agreements contracts that lay out the respective rights, obligations and priorities
More informationTHE BASICS OF CASH COLLATERAL AND DIP FINANCING by Kevin M. Lippman and Jonathan L. Howell
I. Generally A. Importance THE BASICS OF CASH COLLATERAL AND DIP FINANCING by Kevin M. Lippman and Jonathan L. Howell In most Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases, a debtor 1 will need to use cash that is subject
More informationCHAPTER 13 GUIDELINES REGARDING MOTIONS TO VALUE (AKA LAM MOTIONS) (April 15, 2011) Judge Wayne Johnson
CHAPTER 13 GUIDELINES REGARDING MOTIONS TO VALUE (AKA LAM MOTIONS) (April 15, 2011) Judge Wayne Johnson I. INTRODUCTION. Applicable law provides that a chapter 13 debtor may avoid a junior lien on the
More informationCase hdh11 Doc 69 Filed 11/03/17 Entered 11/03/17 18:59:23 Page 1 of 48
Case 17-33964-hdh11 Doc 69 Filed 11/03/17 Entered 11/03/17 18:59:23 Page 1 of 48 Gregory G. Hesse (Texas Bar No. 09549419) HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP 1445 Ross Avenue Suite 3700 Dallas, Texas 75209 Telephone:
More informationCase KRH Doc 676 Filed 11/25/15 Entered 11/25/15 14:41:58 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 23
Document Page 1 of 23 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION In re: HEALTH DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY, INC., et al., Chapter 11 Case No. 15-32919 (KRH)
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION PIKEVILLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) *** *** *** ***
Case: 7:15-cv-00096-ART Doc #: 56 Filed: 02/05/16 Page: 1 of 11 - Page ID#: 2240 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION PIKEVILLE In re BLACK DIAMOND MINING COMPANY,
More informationCase CSS Doc 1223 Filed 07/06/16 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 16-10287-CSS Doc 1223 Filed 07/06/16 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) HORSEHEAD HOLDING CORP., et al., 1 ) Case No. 16-10287 (CSS)
More informationCase MFW Doc 7 Filed 08/26/15 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE : :
Case 15-11761-MFW Doc 7 Filed 08/26/15 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE --------------------------------------------------------------- x In re SANTA FE GOLD
More informationCase Document 190 Filed in TXSB on 07/10/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Case 16-32689 Document 190 Filed in TXSB on 07/10/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS In re: ) Chapter 11 ) LINC USA GP, et al. 1 ) Case No. 16-32689
More informationscc Doc 731 Filed 07/31/18 Entered 07/31/18 14:35:02 Main Document Pg 1 of 15
Pg 1 of 15 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x : In re: : Chapter 11 : TOISA LIMITED, et al., : Case No. 17-10184
More informationIn re Luedtke, Case No svk (Bankr. E.D. Wis. 7/31/2008) (Bankr. E.D. Wis., 2008)
Page 1 In re: Dawn L. Luedtke, Chapter 13, Debtor. Case No. 02-35082-svk. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin. July 31, 2008. MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER SUSAN KELLEY, Bankruptcy Judge. Dawn
More informationCase MFW Doc 1526 Filed 04/28/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 16-10527-MFW Doc 1526 Filed 04/28/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE -------------------------------------------------------x In re: : Chapter 11 : Sports
More informationUpon the annexed Application (the "Application") of SUFFOLK READY MIX, LLC,
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------X In Re: SUFFOLK READY MIX, LLC, Debtor. -------------------------------------------------------X
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. x : : : : : : : : x
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re ULTIMATE ELECTRONICS, INC., et al., Debtors. x x Chapter 11 Case No. 05- ( ) Jointly Administered Hearing Date Objection Due MOTION
More informationCase rfn11 Doc 413 Filed 06/30/14 Entered 06/30/14 13:08:22 Page 1 of 7
Case 13-41498-rfn11 Doc 413 Filed 06/30/14 Entered 06/30/14 13:08:22 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION IN RE: HI-WAY EQUIPMENT COMPANY LLC,
More informationPriority of Withholding Taxes (In re Freedomland, Inc.)
St. John's Law Review Volume 48 Issue 2 Volume 48, December 1973, Number 2 Article 8 August 2012 Priority of Withholding Taxes (In re Freedomland, Inc.) St. John's Law Review Follow this and additional
More informationNarrowing the Scope of Auditor Duties
Narrowing the Scope of Auditor Duties David Margulies, J.D. Candidate 2010 The tort of deepening insolvency refers to an action asserted by a representative of a bankruptcy estate against directors, officers,
More information