Regionwise Priority Sector Advances in India

Transcription

1 Journal of Social Science for Policy Implications, Vol. 1 No. 2, December Regionwise Priority Sector Advances in India Najmi Shabbir 1 Abstract In this paper we look at the geographical distribution of PSA (Priority Sector Advances). After nationalisation of the Banks directed lending to certain sectors, such as, Agriculture, Small Scale Industries and weaker section and others, collectively known as Priority Sector was emphasized. Under this Sectoral and Sub-sectoral targets have been laid down from time to time, with the aim of upliftment of these sectors and to bring about a balanced development of the country. PSA was not uniformly distributed. In some parts of the country the advances to priority sector is above the required level, while in some other parts of the Country, it is less than the required level. For this purpose we make a regional analysis. In the regional analysis the Country has been divided into six regions namely Northern region, North Eastern region, Eastern region, Central region, Southern region, where we look at PSA in all regions, this has been done for four points of time namely , , and Thus how the performance of the regions has been changing has also been revealed. Key Words: Priority Sector Advances, Nationalisation, Weaker Sections, Agriculture, Small Scale industries. 1. Literature Review Joshi (1972) has suggested to RBI to give clear & specific definition of the different components of priority sector as some of the bankers are not clear about the scope of agricultural lending. 1 The Working Group on the Modalities of Implementation of the Priority Sector Lending recommended that out of the advances to priority sector, at least 40 per cent should be extended to agriculture sector by each bank. It also specified that out of total direct lendings under agriculture; at least 50 per cent should be to the weaker sections (small and marginal farmers and landless labourers and persons engaged in allied activities with borrowal limits not exceeding Rs 10,000). Housing loans up to Rs 5000 for construction of houses for SC/ST and weaker sections, assistance to any governmental agency for construction of houses for SC/ST and low-income groups (where loan component does not exceed Rs 5000 per unit) and pure consumption loans granted under the Consumption Credit Scheme was recommended for inclusion in priority sector. It also recommended that decision to increase the share of priority sector targets for public sector banks, should be applicable for private banks in the same way. 2 The working Group on the Role of Banks suggested that the existing target of 40 per cent of total credit to priority sector should remain unchanged. 1 Lecturer Shia P.G. College, Lucknow, Address: 392/FN-3, Gulshana Zahra Apartment Abbass Colony, Maidan L.H. Khan,Kashmiri Mauhalla, Taapa Wali Gali, Lucknow

2 10 Journal of Social Science for Policy Implications, Vol. 1 No. 2, December 2013 The Group suggested a target of 14 per cent of total bank credit for direct finance to agriculture and allied activities against the existing target of 16 per cent for both direct and indirect finance. It suggested that definition of weaker sections should include artisans, village and cottage industries and beneficiaries of IRDP and DRI scheme and SCs/STs and advances to weaker sections should account for 25 per cent of priority sector lending by March Angadi (1983) analyses that because of rapid branch expansion, deposit mobilization, privileged cropped area, and adoption of high yielding variety, the concentration of PSL and agriculture advances is more in some states. 4 Joshi (1986) identified weak fund management capacity of banks due to SLR, CRR & PSL.He found that the low yield rate & rising cost contributed a lot to the declining trend in profitability of banks. 5 Singh (1987) identified many exogenous and endogenous factors contributed a lot to the declining trend in profitability of banks. Continuous increase in the SLR, CRR, emphasis on social goals, growing incidence of industrial sickness, rapid branch expansion in under banked areas are the factors responsible for low profitability of banks. 6 Muhammad Yunus (1988) identified that instead of blaming the defaulters the emphasis should be on proper loan recovery mechanism. 7 Chawala (1988) in his book has revealed that the pace of PSL of commercial banks has received impetus since nationalization. As per the analysis of 20 states, the aggregate PSA in Punjab went up more than 40 times during During the same period total credit in the state rose eleven times. The growth rate during the reference period turned out to be percent p.a. The comparative position of Punjab state in the P.S. vis-à-vis other states in Indian union were fairly good. The percent share of Priority Sector Advances advances in Punjab was the third highest, the first two being Jammu & Kashmir and Haryana in India. In 1980, Punjab relative position continued to be the same. Lending to Priority Sector in Punjab has got an important place since nationalization of 14 commercial banks. It has continued to grow at a fast rate even after crossing the target of 40 percent. Sector-wise growth of commercial banks credit to Priority Sector revealed that bank credit to various constituents of Priority Sector during in Punjab grew significantly, but among all the constituents of Priority sectors like agriculture, the self employed and professional and transport operators grew faster than sectors like small industry and retail trade. During the study period the advances to agriculture and allied activities grew almost 37 times and those to the transport operators 54 times. Although advances to small scale industries grew 6.5 times only, this was slightly better than the growth of advances to the total industrial sector which was only five times. 8 Rangarajan (1991) efficiency of banking system can be improved with the improvement in the quality of loan assets Region wise Priority Sector Lending in India In Table 1, Region wise lending to Priority sector shows that the growth rate of lending in Northern Region was highest in at 27 percent and lowest at 12 percent in as compared to other years. It reveals that in Northern Region rate of lending to Priority Sector was more in and less in In North Eastern Region rate of lending to Priority Sector was highest at 27 percent in as compared to 5 percent in In rate of lending reduced to 16 percent as compared to In Eastern region growth rate of lending remained highest at 28 percent in and lowest at 12 percent in The absolute amount to Priority Sector has increased to Rs crore in as compared to crore in but the rate of lending in was only 15 percent when compared at 28 percent in In Central Region the absolute amount of lending to Priority Sector has increased from till but the growth rate of lending was highest at 28 percent in and then at 15 percent in and lowest at 14 percent in

3 Journal of Social Science for Policy Implications, Vol. 1 No. 2, December In Western Region lending to Priority Sector has increased in absolute terms from to but the rate of lending remained highest at 28 percent in as compared to when it was only 19 percent and the rate of lending to Priority Sector was lowest at 13 percent in when compared to In Southern Region also PSA has increased in absolute terms from till but the rate of lending remained highest in at 28 percent in Southern region also and lowest at 14 percent in (Table 1) Table 2 reveals that percentage share of Population in total Population of India was highest in Central Region of 25 percent in total but lending to Priority Sector remained highest in Southern Region. In Western Region percentage share of population is third highest in total but lending to Priority Sector was second highest in Western Region. In the Central Region percentage share of population to total population is highest but the share of lending to Priority Sector was fourth highest. The percentage share of population is same for both Southern and Eastern Region but lending to Eastern Region was on fifth number for Priority Sector. In North Eastern Region percentage shares of Population as well as share in PSA both are low. A comparative analysis between population and PSL among different regions in shows that the highest Population was in Central region but lending to priority sector was highest in Southern region i.e. Rs crore. Second highest population was in Eastern region but Lending to this region was Rs crore only. In western region the population was third highest but PSL to this region was second highest Rs crore (see Graph 1) In Graph 2, A comparative analysis of PSL in different years among different regions of the country shows that lending to Priority Sector remained more or less same at 33 percent of total PSA in India in Southern region, 23 percent to 26 percent in western region, 18 percent to 22 percent in Northern region, 13 percent and 11 percent in Central region, 11 percent and 9 percent in Eastern region and lowest at 2 percent to 1 percent in North Eastern region. Similar picture is revealed in the following Chart 1. In Northern region lending to Priority Sector had increased in as compared to and then came down in and In North Eastern region lending to Priority Sector had become half of what it was in and remained at 2 percent in , and In Eastern region lending to Priority Sector was highest in , after which it continuously decreased till In Central region lending to Priority Sector was highest in , came down in , remained constant in and remained lowest in In Western region the lending was lowest in , which increased in and came down in In Southern Region lending to Priority Sector was 33 percent in which came down to 30 percent in and then increased to 32 percent and 33 percent in and respectively ((Graph 2). At last point of time all the regions have witnessed a fall in PSL, the reason might be the worldwide recession being experienced since 2007, which has also impacted the real sectors, resulting in less banking activities. The region wise share of PSL to all India figures reveals that Southern region qualifies for highest share at all the four selected points of time.(see chart 1)

4 12 Journal of Social Science for Policy Implications, Vol. 1 No. 2, December 2013 Chart 1: Region wise Percentage Distribution of Priority Sector Advances Table 1: Region wise Amount and Growth Rate of Priority Sector Lending Regions Growth rate (percent) to Growth rate (percent) to Growth rate (percent) to Northern region North Eastern region Eastern Region Central Region Western Region Southern Region All India Source: Reserve Bank of India Table 2: Percentage Share of Population and PSA among Different Regions of the Country Regions Population (in thousands) Population % in total Northern region North Eastern region Eastern Region Central Region Western Region Southern Region All India Source: Census Report 2001 and Reserve Bank of India

5 Journal of Social Science for Policy Implications, Vol. 1 No. 2, December Graph 1: Region wise Distribution of Population and Priority Sector Advances Source: Based on data placed in table Graph 2: Region wise Priority Sector Lending in Different Years by SCBs 3. Conclusion Source: Based on data placed in table 1 The regional share in total PSL of the country shows that the share was highest in the Southern region at all selected points of time. This was followed by the Western region, the Northern region, the Central region and the Eastern region. The North Eastern region occupied the lowest position. At last point of time all the regions have witnessed a fall in PSL, the reason might be the worldwide recession being experienced since 2007, which has also impacted the real sectors, resulting in less banking activities. From the analysis following facts emerge, the PSA have witnessed a deceleration in the growth rate between 2006 to 2012, across the board in all the regions of the country. As has been indicated already there are two reasons for this (I) Worldwide recession in the financial sector from September 2007 onwards, and (II) increased NPAs in the Sector has forced the bankers to cut down the advances to this sector, in wake of the prudential norms and to enhance the productivity levels.

6 14 Journal of Social Science for Policy Implications, Vol. 1 No. 2, December 2013 References P. N. Joshi (1972), Financing of Priority Sectors by Commercial Banks, The Journal of Indian Institute of Bankers, XLIII (1):27-34 Working Group on the Modalities of Implementation of the Priority Sector Lending and 20-Point Economic Programme by Banks (Chairman: Dr K.S. Krishnaswamy), (1980) Working Group on the Role of Banks in Implementation of New 20-Point Programme (Chairman: Shri A. Ghosh), (1982) V.B. Angadi (1983), Bank s Advances to Priority Sectors: an Enquiry in to the Causes of Concentration, Economic & Political Weekly, and XVIII (13): , March 26. P.N. Joshi (1986), Profitability and Profit Planning in Banks The Journal of Indian Institute of Bankers (April-June) 57 (2). S. Singh (1987), Profitability of Commercial Banks in India, Punjab National Bank Monthly Review, (October) II (II). Yunus. Muhammad. (1988), The Poor as the Engine of Development, Economic Impact, 63: A.S. Chawala, K.K. Uppal, Keshav Malhotra (1988), Emerging issues in priority sector financing, Indian Banking towards 21 st century, Deep and Deep Publication, Pp C. Rangarajan (1991), Banking Development since 1947; Achievement and Challenges, Financial System in India, II.