ANNEX E CONTENTS LIST E-1 Eligibility 1.1. Funded credit protection On-balance sheet netting Master netting agreements repurchase

Transcription

1 ANNEX E CONTENTS LIST E-1 Eligibility 1.1. Funded credit protection On-balance sheet netting Master netting agreements repurchase transactions / securities or commodities lending or borrowing Collateral Eligibility under all approaches Additional eligibility under the Financial Collateral Comprehensive Method Additional eligibility for repurchase transactions / securities or commodities lending or borrowing Additional eligibility under the Foundation IRB Approach (a) Real estate collateral (b) Receivables (c) Other physical collateral Other funded protection Cash on deposit, or cash assimilated instruments held by, a third party bank Life insurance policies pledged to the lending institution Institution instruments repurchased on request 1.2. Unfunded credit protection Eligibility under all approaches Eligible types of credit derivatives E.2 Minimum requirements 2.1. Funded credit protection On-balance sheet netting Master netting agreements repurchase transactions / securities or commodities lending or borrowing Financial collateral Minimum requirements under all approaches and methods Additional minimum requirements under the Financial Collateral Simple Method Minimum requirements for real estate collateral under the Foundation IRB Approach Minimum requirements for receivables under the Foundation IRB Approach Minimum requirements for other physical collateral under the Foundation IRB Approach Minimum requirements for leasing under the Foundation IRB Approach Minimum requirements for the recognition of other funded protection Cash on deposit, or cash assimilated instruments held by, a third party bank Life insurance policies pledged to the lending institution 2.2. Unfunded credit protection Requirements common to guarantees and credit derivatives Requirements for guarantees 1

2 Requirements for credit derivatives E-3 Calculating the effects of credit risk mitigation 3.1. Funded credit protection On-balance sheet netting Master netting agreements repurchase transactions / securities or commodities lending or borrowing Calculating the fully adjusted exposure value (a) Using 'Supervisory' or 'Own Estimates' volatility adjustments (b) Using the Internal Models approach Calculating risk weighted assets Financial collateral Financial Collateral Simple Method (a) Valuation (b) Calculating risk weighted assets Financial Collateral Comprehensive Method (a) Calculating adjusted values (b) Calculating volatility adjustments to be applied (i) Supervisory volatility adjustments (ii) Own Estimates of volatility adjustments (iii) Scaling up of volatility adjustments (iv) Conditions for applying a 0% volatility adjustment (c) Calculating risk weighted assets (i) Standardised Approach (ii) IRB Foundation Approach Other eligible collateral under the IRB Foundation Approach Valuation Calculating risk weighted assets Calculating risk weighted assets for mixed pools of collateral Other funded credit protection Deposits with third party institutions Life insurance policies pledged to the lending institution Institution instruments repurchased on request 3.2. Unfunded credit protection Valuation Calculating risk weighted assets Partial protection tranching Standardised Approach Foundation IRB Approach E-4 Maturity mismatches 4.1. Definition of maturity 2

3 4.2. Regulatory capital treatment Funded credit protection Financial Collateral Simple Method Funded credit protection Financial Collateral Comprehensive Method Unfunded credit protection E-5 Combinations of CRM in the Standardised Approach E-6 Basket CRM techniques 6.1. First-to-default credit derivatives 6.2. Second-to-default credit derivatives 3

4 ANNEX E-1 Eligibility This section sets out the assets and third party entities that may be recognised as eligible sources of funded and unfunded credit protection respectively for the purposes of granting capital relief Funded credit protection On-balance sheet netting Subject to paragraph below, where the credit risk mitigation technique relies on the on-balance sheet netting of mutual claims between the institution and its counterparty, eligibility is limited to reciprocal cash balances between the institution and the counterparty. Only loans and deposits of the lending institution may receive regulatory capital relief as a result of an on-balance sheet netting agreement Master netting agreements covering repurchase transactions / securities or commodities lending or borrowing transactions For institutions adopting the Financial Collateral Comprehensive Method, the effects of bilateral netting contracts covering only repurchase transactions and/or securities or commodities lending or borrowing transactions with a counterparty may be recognised. To be recognised the collateral taken and securities or commodities borrowed within such agreements must comply with the eligibility requirements in respect of collateral set out below. The effects of such agreements shall not be recognised where transactions covered by the agreement include both transactions whereby securities or guaranteed rights relating to title to securities are transferred and transactions whereby commodities or guaranteed rights relating to commodities are transferred Collateral Where the credit risk mitigation technique used relies on the right of the institution to liquidate or retain assets, eligibility depends upon whether capital is calculated under the Standardised Approach or the IRB Foundation Approach. Eligibility further depends upon whether, in calculating the reduction in capital requirements as a result of the use of financial collateral, the Financial Collateral Simple Method is used or the Financial Collateral Comprehensive Method as set out in section E-3 of this Annex. In relation to repurchase transactions / securities or commodities lending or borrowing transactions, eligibility also depends upon whether the transaction is booked in the Banking Book or the Trading Book Eligibility under all Approaches to collateral Eligible Collateral is as follows: (a) Cash on deposit with, or cash assimilated instruments held by, the lending institution. 4

5 (b) (c) Debt securities issued by central governments or central banks which securities have a credit assessment by a recognised ECAI or ECA which credit assessment is mapped by the competent authority into credit quality step 4 or above under the relevant methodology for the risk weighting of claims on sovereigns or central banks under the Title II, Chapter 1, Section I of this Directive; For these purposes, debt securities issued by central governments or central banks shall be deemed to include - debt securities issued by regional governments or local authorities claims on which are treated as claims on the sovereign in whose jurisdiction they are established under Annex C-1, section 2; - debt securities issued by multilateral development banks to which a 0% risk weight is applied under or by virtue of Annex C-1, section 4; - debt securities issued by international organisations which are assigned a 0% risk weight under Annex C-1, section 5. Debt securities issued by institutions which securities have a credit assessment by a recognised ECAI which is mapped by the competent authority into credit quality step 3 or above under the Credit Assessment Based Methodology for the risk weighting of claims on institutions under Title II, Chapter 1, Section 1 of this Directive. For these purposes, debt securities issued by institutions include - debt securities issued by regional governments or local authorities other than those claims on which are treated as claims on the sovereign in whose jurisdiction they are established under Annex C-1, section 2; - debt securities issued by public sector entities, claims on which are treated as claims on institutions under Annex C-1, section 3; - debt securities issued by multilateral development banks other than those to which a 0% risk weight is applied under or by virtue of Annex C-1, section 4; (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) Debt securities issued by other entities which securities have a credit assessment by a recognised ECAI which is mapped by the competent authority into credit quality step 3 or above under the methodology for the risk weighting of claims on corporates under Titlle II, Chapter 1, Section I of this Directive. Short term debt securities with a credit assessment by a recognised external credit assessment institution which is mapped by the competent authority into credit quality step 3 or above under the methodology for the risk weighting of short term claims under Title II, Chapter 1, Section I of this Directive. Equities that are included in a main index; and Gold Debt securities issued by institutions which securities do not have a credit assessment by a recognised external credit assessment institution are eligible for recognition if they fulfil each of the following criteria: 5

6 (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) they are listed on a recognised exchange; they qualify as senior debt; all other rated issues by the issuing institution of the same seniority having a credit assessment by a recognised ECAI have a credit assessment by a recognised external credit assessment institution which is mapped by the competent authority into credit quality step 3 or above under the Credit Assessment Based Methodology for the risk weighting of claims on institutions under Title II, Chapter 1, Section I of this Directive or into credit quality step 3 or above under the methodology for the risk weighting of short term claims under Title II, Chapter 1, Section I of this Directive; the lending institution has no information to suggest that the issue would justify a credit assessment below one which would be mapped into credit quality step 3 under the Credit Assessment Based Methodology for the risk weighting of claims on institutions under Title II, Chapter 1, Section I of this Directive or into credit quality step 3 under the methodology for the risk weighting of short term claims under Title II, Chapter 1, Section I of this Directive; and the competent authority is sufficiently confident about the market liquidity of the instrument. Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities (UCITS) and mutual fund units are eligible for recognition under the following conditions: (i) they have a daily public price quote; and (ii) the UCITS/mutual funds must be limited to investing in other instruments that are eligible for recognition in the Financial Collateral Simple Method. The use (or potential use) by a UCITS or mutual fund of derivative instruments to hedge permitted investments shall not prevent units in that UCITS or mutual fund from being eligible. No debt security which is required to be assigned a risk weight of 150% under section 10 of Annex C-1 shall be eligible for recognition. In relation to paragraphs (b), (c), (d) and (e) above, where two external credit assessments of recognised ECAIs would apply to securities, the less favourable assessment shall be deemed to apply. In cases where more than two external credit assessments of recognised ECAIs would apply, the two most favourable assessments shall be deemed to apply. If the two most favourable assessments are different, the less favourable of the two shall be deemed to apply Additional eligibility under the Financial Collateral Comprehensive Method whether used in the Standardised Approach or the IRB Foundation Approach In addition to the collateral set out above, in the Financial Collateral Comprehensive Method when applied under the Standardised Approach or the IRB Foundation Approach, the following collateral is eligible: Equities not included in a main index but traded on a recognised exchange. 6

7 UCITS and mutual fund units that (a) have a daily price quote; and (b) are units in UCITS or mutual funds that are limited to investing in other instruments that are eligible for recognition in the Financial Collateral Comprehensive Method. The use (or potential use) by a UCITS or mutual fund of derivative instruments to hedge permitted investments shall not prevent units in that UCITS or mutual fund from being eligible Additional eligibility for repurchase transactions / securities or commodities lending or borrowing transactions under the Financial Collateral Comprehensive Method whether used in the Standardised Approach or the IRB Foundation Approach For repurchase transactions / securities or commodities lending or borrowing transactions booked in the Trading Book, all financial instruments and commodities that are eligible to be included in the Trading Book will be regarded as eligible collateral Additional eligibility under the IRB Foundation Approach (a) Real estate collateral (I) Residential real estate which is or will be occupied or let by the borrower and commercial real estate i.e. offices and other commercial premises are eligible for recognition under the conditions in (II) below: (II) 1. The value of the property does not materially depend upon the credit quality of the obligor. This requirement is not intended to preclude situations where purely macroeconomic factors affect both the value of the property and the performance of the borrower. 2. The risk of the borrower does not materially depend upon the performance of the underlying property or project, but rather on the underlying capacity of the borrower to repay the debt from other sources. As such, repayment of the facility does not materially depend on any cash flow generated by the underlying property serving as collateral. Institutions may also recognise shares in Finnish residential housing companies operating in accordance with the Finnish Housing Company Act of 1991 or subsequent equivalent legislation in respect of residential property which is or will be occupied or let by the borrower, as residential real estate collateral, provided that the conditions laid down in this Section are fulfilled. The competent authorities of the member states may also authorise their institutions to recognise shares in Finnish housing companies operating in accordance with the Finnish Housing Company Act of 1991 or subsequent equivalent legislation as commercial real estate collateral, provided that the conditions laid down in this paragraph are fulfilled. Member States shall inform the Commission of the use they make of this paragraph. The competent authorities of the member states may waive the requirement for their institutions to comply with the condition 2 above for exposures secured by residential real 7

8 estate property situated within the territory of those Member States that use this waiver, if the competent authorities of the Member States have evidence that this is a well-developed and long-established market with loss-rates which are sufficiently low to justify such treatment. This shall not prevent the competent authorities of a Member State, which does not use this waiver from recognising it for RRE property within the territories of those member states that use the waiver. Member States shall inform the Commission of the use they make of this waiver. The competent authorities of the member states may waive the requirement for their institutions to comply with the condition 2 above for CRE collateral situated within the territory of those Member States that use this waiver, if the competent authorities of the Member States have evidence that this is a well-developed and long-established market and loss-rates stemming from CRE lending do not exceed the following limits: a) up to 50 % of the market value (or where applicable and if lower 60 % of loan-tovalue (LTV) based on mortgage-lending-value (MLV)) must not exceed 0.3 % of the outstanding CRE loans in any given year. b) overall losses stemming from CRE lending must not exceed 0.5 % of the outstanding loans in any given year. If either of these tests is not satisfied in a given year, the eligibility to use this treatment will cease and the original eligibility criteria would need to be satisfied again before it could be applied in the future. Countries applying such a treatment must publicly disclose that these conditions are met. This shall not prevent the competent authorities of a Member State, which does not use this waiver, from recognising it for CRE collateral within the territories of those member states that use the waiver. Member States shall inform the Commission of the use they make of this waiver. (b) Receivables The following financial assets of the borrower: Claims with an original maturity of less than or equal to one year where repayment will occur through the commercial or financial flows related to the underlying assets of the borrower. This includes both self-liquidating debt arising from the sale of goods or services linked to a commercial transaction and general amounts owed by buyers, suppliers, renters, national and local governmental authorities, or other non-affiliated parties not related to the sale of goods or services linked to a commercial transaction. Eligible receivables do not include those associated with securitisations, sub-participations or credit derivatives. (c) Other physical collateral Competent authorities may recognise the credit risk mitigating effect of other types of physical collateral if satisfied as to the following in respect of the type of physical collateral in question: the existence of liquid markets for disposal of collateral in an expeditious and economically efficient manner; the existence of well-established, publicly available market prices for the collateral. The institution must be able to demonstrate that there is no evidence that the net prices it receives when collateral is realised deviates significantly from these market prices. 8

9 (d) Leasing Subject to meeting the requirements set out at section E-2, paragraph 2.1.7, leasing will be accorded the same treatment as loans collateralised by the same type of collateral Other funded credit protection Cash on deposit with, or cash assimilated instruments held by, a third party bank. Cash on deposit with, or cash assimilated instruments held by, a third party institution pledged to the lending institution may be recognised as eligible credit protection Life insurance policies pledged to the lending institution Life insurance policies pledged to the lending institution may be recognised as eligible credit protection Institution instruments repurchased on request Instruments issued by third party institutions which will be repurchased by that institution on request may be recognised as eligible credit protection. 9

10 1.2. Unfunded Credit Protection Eligibility of protection providers under all Approaches Subject to paragraph below third parties eligible to provide credit protection by way of guarantee or credit derivative are as set out below. This applies under the Standardised and IRB Foundation Approaches. (a) Central governments and central banks; (b) regional governments or local authorities; (c) multi-lateral development banks; (d) international organisations which receive a 0% risk weight under section 5 of Annex C-1. (e) public sector entities claims on which are treated by the competent authorities as claims on institutions under section 3 of Annex C-1 (f) (g) Institutions; and Other corporate entities, including parent, subsidiary and affiliate corporate entites, that have a credit assessment by a recognised ECAI which is mapped by the competent authority into credit quality step 2 or above under the methodology for the risk weighting of claims on corporates under the Standardised Approach and, in the case of institutions using the IRB Approach, unrated corporate entities which are internally rated and associated with a PD equivalent to credit quality step 2 or above under the Standardised Approach Types of credit derivatives The following types of credit derivatives are eligible for recognition subject to the qualifications set out below. (i) (ii) (iii) Credit default swaps that provide credit protection equivalent to guarantees Total return swaps that provide credit protection equivalent to guarantees Credit linked notes to the extent of their cash funding 10

11 Where an institution buys credit protection through a total return swap and records the net payments received on the swap as net income, but does not record offsetting deterioration in the value of the asset that is protected (either through reductions in fair value or by an addition to reserves), the credit protection will not be recognised In relation to credit linked notes, there are no eligibility requirements as to the persons providing the protection The following definitions shall apply: Credit default swap means a contract according to which one party to the contract undertakes to make a payment to the other party to the contract on the occurrence of a specified event or events relating to the creditworthiness of a third party. The making of such payment does not in itself give rise to a legal entitlement in the protection provider against the third party. Total return swap means a contract according to which one party to the contract undertakes to make payments to the other party to the contract of all cashflows arising from a specified asset (or assets) plus any increase in the market value of the asset (or assets) since the last payment date or the commencement date of the contract, whichever is the most recent, and according to which the recipient of these amounts undertakes to pay to the first party an interest rate related flow plus any decrease in the market value of the asset (or assets) since the last payment date or the commencement date, whichever is the most recent. Credit linked note means a cash funded debt instrument which is redeemable by the issuer in accordance with the terms of the instrument, or the terms of redemption of which are altered, on the occurrence of a specified event or events related to the creditworthiness of a third party. 11

12 ANNEX E-2 Minimum Requirements This section sets out the minimum requirements that must be fulfilled before regulatory capital relief will be granted on the basis of credit risk mitigation. Where an institution seeks regulatory capital relief on the basis of its credit risk mitigation practices, the institution must satisfy its supervisor that it has adequate risk management processes to control those risks to which the institution may be exposed as a result of carrying out credit risk mitigation practices Funded credit protection On-balance sheet netting (other than master netting agreements covering repurchase transactions / securities or commodities lending or borrowing transactions) The following requirements apply under the Standardised and IRB Foundation Approaches. To be recognised, such netting agreements 1. must have a well-founded legal basis and be legally enforceable under applicable law, including in the event of the bankruptcy of a counterparty 2. give the non-defaulting party the unfettered, legally enforceable right to immediately close-out all transactions under the agreement upon the event of default, including in the event of the bankruptcy of the counterparty 3. the institution must be able at any time to determine those assets and liabilities with the same counterparty that are subject to the netting agreement 4. the institution must monitor and control its roll-off risks; 5. the institution must monitor and control the relevant exposures on a net basis Master netting agreements covering repurchase transactions and/or securities or commodities lending or borrowing transactions To be recognised, such netting agreements must: 1. have a well founded legal basis and be legally enforceable under applicable law, including in the event of the bankruptcy or insolvency of a counterparty 2. give the non-defaulting party the right to terminate and close-out in a timely manner all transactions under the agreement upon the event of default, including in the event of the bankruptcy or insolvency of the counterparty 3. provide for the netting of gains and losses on transactions closed out under a master agreement so that a single net amount is owed by one party to the other. 12

13 In addition the minimum requirements for the recognition of financial collateral set out in paragraphs below must be fulfilled. Netting across positions in the banking book and trading book will only be recognised when the netted transactions fulfill the following conditions: all transactions are marked to market daily the collateral instruments used in the transactions are recognised as eligible financial collateral in the banking book Financial collateral Minimum requirements for the recognition of financial collateral under all Approaches and Methods Before capital relief will be granted under this approach the following conditions must be met: a) Low correlation The credit quality of the obligor and the value of the collateral must not have a material positive correlation. Securities issued by the collateral provider, or any related group entity are not eligible. b) Legal certainty Institutions must fulfill any contractual and statutory requirements in respect of the enforceability of the collateral arrangements under the law applicable to the bank s interest in the collateral. Institutions must have appropriate legal opinions confirming the enforceability of the collateral arrangements in all relevant jurisdictions. Institutions must further ensure that the analysis in these opinions remains current. Institutions procedures must ensure that any legal conditions required for declaring the default of the customer and liquidating the collateral are observed. c) Operational requirements The collateral arrangements must be properly documented, with a clear and robust procedure for the timely liquidation of collateral. Institutions must employ robust procedures and processes to control risks arising from the use of collateral, including in particular strategy, consideration of the underlying credit, valuation, policies and procedures, systems, control of roll-off risks, and management of concentration risk arising from the institution s use of collateral and its interaction with the institution s overall credit risk profile. Institutions must calculate the market value of the collateral, and revalue it accordingly, with a minimum frequency of once every six months. 13

14 Where the collateral is held by a third party, institutions must take reasonable steps to ensure that the third party segregates the collateral from its own assets Additional minimum requirements for the recognition of financial collateral under the Financial Collateral Simple Method In addition to the requirements set out above the following requirement applies under the Financial Collateral Simple Method The collateral must be pledged for the life of the exposure Minimum requirements for the recognition of real estate collateral under the IRB Foundation Approach. In order to receive recognition for real estate collateral an institution must meet the following standards: a) Legal certainty Any collateral pledged shall be legally enforceable under all applicable laws and statutes, and pledges over collateral shall be properly filed on a timely basis. Pledges over collateral shall reflect a perfected lien (i.e. all legal requirements for establishing the pledge shall been fulfilled). The collateral agreement and the legal process underpinning it shall enable the institution to realise the collateral value within a reasonable timeframe. b) Collateral valuation principles The property shall be valued at or less than the current market value under which it could be sold under private contract between a willing seller and an arm s-length buyer on the date of valuation. The value of the collateral shall be based on the value of the property and the nature and extent of the pledge of the property taking into account the existence of prior claims. c) Monitoring of property values The institution shall monitor the value of the collateral and property on a frequent basis and at a minimum once every year. More frequent monitoring shall be required where the market is subject to significant changes in conditions. Statistical methods may be used to monitor the value of the property and to identify property that needs revaluation. The property shall be evaluated by a qualified professional when information indicates that the value of the property may have declined materially relative to general market prices. d) Documentation The types of CRE and RRE collateral accepted by the institution and its lending policies (advance rates) when this type of collateral is taken shall be clearly documented. 14

15 e) Insurance The institution shall have procedures to monitor that the property taken as collateral is adequately insured against damage Minimum requirements for the recognition of receivables as collateral under the IRB Foundation Approach Legal certainty The legal mechanism by which collateral is given must be robust and ensure that the lender has clear rights over the proceeds from the collateral. Institutions must take all steps necessary to fulfil local requirements in respect of the enforceability of security interest. There should be a framework which allows the lender to have a first priority claim over the collateral subject to national discretion to allow such claims to be subject to the claims of preferential creditors provided for in legislative or implementing provisions. Institutions must obtain legal opinions confirming the enforceability of the collateral arrangements in all relevant jurisdictions. The collateral arrangements must be properly documented, with a clear and robust procedure for the timely collection of collateral. Institutions procedures should ensure that any legal conditions required for declaring the default of the customer and timely collection of collateral are observed. In the event of the borrower s financial distress or default, the institution should have legal authority to sell or assign the receivables to other parties without consent of the receivables obligors Risk management The institution must have a sound process for determining the credit risk in the receivables. Such a process should include, among other things, analyses of the borrower s business and industry and the types of customers with whom the borrower does business. Where the institution relies on the borrower to ascertain the credit risk of the customers, the institution must review the borrower s credit practice to ascertain its soundness and credibility. The margin between the amount of the exposure and the value of the receivables must reflect all appropriate factors, including the cost of collection, concentration within the receivables pool pledged by an individual borrower, and potential concentration risk within the institution s total exposures beyond that controlled by the institution s general methodology. The institution must maintain a continuous monitoring process that is appropriate for the specific exposures (either immediate or contingent) attributable to the collateral to be utilised as a risk mitigant. This process may include, as appropriate and relevant, ageing reports (listing receivables by customer name, balance outstanding and current payment status), control of trade documents, borrowing base certificates, frequent audits of collateral, confirmation of accounts, control of the proceeds of accounts paid, analyses of dilution (credits given by the borrower to the issuer, as for returns of the product, forgiveness of obligations and bad debts) and regular financial analysis of both the borrower and the issuers of the receivables, especially in the case when a small number of large-sized receivables are taken as collateral. Observance of the 15

16 institution s overall concentration limits should be monitored. Additionally, compliance with loan covenants, environmental restrictions, and other legal requirements should be reviewed on a regular basis. The receivables pledged by a borrower should be diversified and not be unduly correlated with the borrower. Where there is material positive correlation, the attendant risks should be taken into account in the setting of margins for the collateral pool as a whole. Receivables from affiliates of the borrower (including subsidiaries and employees) will not be recognised as risk mitigants. The institution should have a documented process for collecting receivable payments in distressed situations. The requisite facilities for collection should be in place, even when the institution normally looks to the borrower for collections Minimum requirements for the recognition of other physical collateral under the IRB Foundation Approach In order for an institution to receive recognition for additional physical collateral, it must meet all the standards in paragraph 2.1.4, subject to the following modifications. First Claim: With the sole exception of permissible prior claims specified in paragraph [not yet included], only first liens on, or charges over, collateral are permissible. As such, the institution must have priority over all other lenders to the realised proceeds of the collateral. The loan agreement must include detailed descriptions of the collateral plus detailed specifications of the manner and frequency of revaluation. The types of physical collateral accepted by the institution and policies and practices in respect of the appropriate amount of each type of collateral relative to the exposure amount must be clearly documented in internal credit policies and procedures and available for examination and/or audit review. Institution credit policies with regard to the transaction structure must address appropriate collateral requirements relative to the exposure amount, the ability to liquidate the collateral readily, the ability to establish objectively a price or market value, the frequency with which the value can readily be obtained (including a professional appraisal or valuation), and the volatility of the value of the collateral.) Both initial valuation and revaluation must take fully into account any deterioration and/or obsolescence of the collateral. Particular attention must be paid in valuation / revaluation to the effects of the passage of time on fashion- or date-sensitive collateral. In cases of inventories (e.g., raw materials, work-in-process, finished goods, dealers inventories of autos) and equipment, the periodic revaluation process must include physical inspection of the collateral Minimum requirements for the recognition of leasing under the IRB Foundation Approach (a) The minimum requirements for the collateral type must be met (CRE/RRE or other physical collateral). In addition, the institution must also meet the following standards: 16

17 Robust risk management on the part of the lessor with respect to the location of the asset, the use to which it is put, its age, and planned obsolescence; A robust legal framework establishing the lessor s legal ownership of the asset and its ability to exercise its rights as owner in a timely fashion; and The difference between the rate of depreciation of the physical asset and the rate of amortisation of the lease payments must not be so large as overstate the credit risk mitigation attributed to the leased assets. (b) Leases that expose the bank to residual value risk will be treated in the following manner. Residual value risk is the bank s exposure to potential loss due to the fair value of the equipment declining below its residual estimate at lease inception. The discounted lease payment stream will receive a risk weight appropriate for the lessee s financial strength (PD) and supervisory or own-estimate of LGD, which ever is appropriate. The residual value will be risk weighted at 100% Minimum requirements for the recognition of other funded credit protection Cash on deposit with, or cash assimilated instruments held by, a third party institution Such funded protection shall be eligible for the treatment set out at section E-3, para below where: The borrower s claim against the third party institution is openly pledged or assigned to the lending institution; The third party institution is notified of the pledge or assignment; As a result of the notification, the third party institution is able to make payments solely to the lending institution or to other parties with the lending institution s consent. The pledge or assignment is unconditional and irrevocable Life insurance policies pledged to the lending institution. Life insurance policies pledged to the lending institution may be recognised as eligible credit protection where the following requirements are satisfied: the company providing the life insurance is eligible as an unfunded protection provider under the terms of this Directive; the life insurance policy is openly pledged or assigned to the lending institution; the company providing the life insurance is notified of the pledge or assignment and as a result may not cancel the contract or pay amounts payable under the contract without the consent of the lending institution; 17

18 the policy must have a declared surrender value which is a non-reducible amount; the lending institution must have the right to cancel the policy and receive the surrender value in a timely way in the event of the default of the borrower; the lending institution is informed of any non-payments under the policy by the policy-holder; the life insurance policy must be pledged for the maturity of the loan; and the pledge must be legally enforceable in all relevant jurisdictions. 18

19 2.2. Unfunded credit protection The following requirements apply in the Standardised Approach and the IRB Foundation Approach Requirements common to guarantees and credit derivatives Subject to paragraph , a guarantee or credit derivative attracting regulatory capital relief must fulfil each of the following conditions: (a) (b) It must represent a direct claim on the protection provider. The extent of the credit protection is clearly defined and incontrovertible. (c) A credit protection contract giving rise to regulatory capital relief must not contain any clause, the fulfilment of which is outside the direct control of the lender, that: (i) Would allow the protection provider unilaterally to cancel the credit cover; (ii) would increase the effective cost of cover as a result of deteriorating credit quality in the protected exposure; (iii) Could prevent the protection provider from being obliged to pay out in a timely manner in the event that the original obligor fails to make any payments due; or (iv) Could allow the maturity of the credit protection agreed ex ante to be reduced ex post by the protection provider. (d) It must be legally enforceable in all relevant jurisdictions Operational requirements The institution must satisfy its supervisor that it has systems in place to manage the concentration of risk arising from the institution s use of guarantees or credit derivatives. The institution must be able to demonstrate how its strategy in respect of its use of credit derivatives and guarantees interacts with its management of its overall risk profile Sovereign counter-guarantees Where an exposure is protected by a guarantee which is counter-guaranteed by a sovereign], the exposure may be treated as protected by a sovereign guarantee provided the following conditions are satisfied: (i) the counter-guarantee covers all credit risk elements of the claim; 19

20 (ii) both the original guarantee and the counter-guarantee meet the requirements for guarantees prescribed at paragraphs , , and 2.2.2, except that the counter-guarantee need not be direct and explicit to the original claim; and (iii) the competent authority is satisfied that the cover is robust and that nothing in the historical evidence suggests that the coverage of the counter-guarantee is less than effectively equivalent to that of a direct sovereign guarantee Requirements for guarantees In order for a guarantee to give rise to regulatory capital relief, the following conditions must be satisfied: (a) (b) (c) On the qualifying default/non-payment of the counterparty, the lending institution must have the right to pursue, in a timely manner, the guarantor for monies outstanding under the loan, rather than having to pursue the obligor to recover its exposure. The act of the guarantor making a payment under the guarantee confers on the guarantor the right to pursue the obligor for monies outstanding under the loan. The guarantee must be an explicitly documented obligation assumed by the guarantor The guarantee must cover all types of payments the underlying obligor is expected to make in respect of the claim Requirements for credit derivatives In order for a credit derivative to give rise to regulatory capital relief, the following conditions must be satisfied: (a) The credit events specified under the credit derivative must at a minimum include: failure to pay the amounts due under terms of the underlying obligation that are in effect at the time of such failure (with a grace period that is close in line or shorter than the grace period in the underlying obligation). bankruptcy, insolvency or inability of the obligor to pay its debts, or its failure or admission in writing of its inability generally to pay its debts as they become due, and analagous events; and restructuring of the underlying obligation involving forgiveness or postponement of principal, interest or fees that results in a credit loss event (i.e. charge-off, specific provision or other similar debit to the profit and loss account). [Note. Work is continuing on the question of the requirement for the inclusion of restructuring as a credit event.] (b) The credit derivative shall not terminate prior to expiration of any grace period required for a default on the underlying obligation to occur as a result of a failure to pay. 20

21 (c) (e) (f) (g) (h) Credit derivatives allowing for cash settlement are recognised for capital purposes insofar as a robust valuation process is in place in order to estimate loss reliably. There must be a clearly specified period for obtaining post-credit-event valuations of the underlying obligation. If the protection purchaser s right/ability to transfer the underlying obligation to the protection provider is required for settlement, the terms of the underlying obligation must provide that any required consent to such transfer may not be unreasonably withheld. The identity of the parties responsible for determining whether a credit event has occurred must be clearly defined. This determination must not be the sole responsibility of the protection seller. The protection buyer must have the right/ability to inform the protection provider of the occurrence of a credit event; A mismatch between the underlying obligation and the reference obligation under the credit derivative (i.e. the obligation used for the purposes of determining cash settlement value or the deliverable obligation) is permissible only if (1) the reference obligation ranks pari passu with or is junior to the underlying obligation, and (2) the underlying obligation and reference obligation share the same obligor (i.e., the same legal entity) and there are in place legally enforceable cross-default or cross-acceleration clauses. A mismatch between the underlying obligation and the obligation used for purposes of determining whether a credit event has occurred is permissible only if (1) the latter obligation ranks pari passu with or is junior to the underlying obligation, and (2) both obligations share the same obligor (i.e. the same legal entity) and there are in place legally enforceable cross-default or cross-acceleration clauses. 21

22 ANNEX E- 3 Calculating the effects of credit risk mitigation For the purposes of calculating the effects of credit risk mitigation, investments in credit linked notes issued by the lending institution are to be treated as cash collateral Funded Credit Protection On-balance sheet netting (other than master netting agreements covering repurchase transactions / securities or commodities lending or borrowing transactions) For the purposes of calculating their effect for capital requirements loans and deposits with the lending institution subject to on-balance sheet netting are to be treated as cash collateral Master netting agreements covering repurchase transactions / securities or commodities lending or borrowing transactions Calculation of the fully-adjusted exposure value (a) Using the Supervisory volatility adjustments or the Own Estimates volatility adjustments approaches Subject to (b) below, in calculating the fully adjusted amount of the net exposure (E*) resulting from the application of an eligible master netting agreement covering repurchase transactions and/or securities or commodities lending or borrowing transactions, the volatility adjustments to be applied will be calculated either using the Supervisory volatility adjustments approach or the Own Estimates volatility adjustments approach as prescribed in paragraphs (b) for the Financial Collateral Comprehensive Method. The same conditions and requirements for the use of the Own Estimates approach shall apply as apply under the Financial Collateral Comprehensive Method. The net position in each type of security shall be calculated by subtracting from the total value of the securities of that type lent or sold under the master netting agreement, the total value of securities of that type borrowed or purchased under the agreement. For these purposes, type of security means securities which are issued by the same entity, have the same issue date, the same maturity and are subject to the same terms and conditions. The net position in each currency other than the settlement currency of the master netting agreement, shall be calculated by subtracting from the total value of securities denominated in that currency lent or sold under the master netting agreement added to the amount of cash in that currency lent or transferred under the agreement, the total value of securities denominated in that currency borrowed or purchased under the agreement added to the amount of cash in that currency borrowed or received by way of purchase price under the agreement. 22

23 The volatility adjustment appropriate to a given type of security or cash position shall be applied to the positive or negative net position in the securities of that type. The foreign exchange risk (fx) volatility adjustment shall be applied to the net positive or negative position in each currency other than the settlement currency of the master netting agreement. The fully adjusted exposure (E*) for institutions using the Supervisory volatility adjustments or the Own Estimates volatility adjustments approaches shall be calculated according to the following formula: E* = max {0, [( (E) - (C)) + ( net position in each security x H sec) + + ( E fx x Hfx)]} Where E is the value (or in the case of cash, amount) of each separate exposure under the agreement C is the value of the securities received or purchased or the cash received as collateral or otherwise in respect of each such exposure. (E) is the sum of all Es (as defined above) under the agreement (C) is the sum of all Cs (as defined above) under the agreement E fx is the net position (positive or negative) in a given currency other than the settlement currency of the agreement as calculated under the rule prescribed above. H sec is the volatility adjustment appropriate to a particular type of security H fx is the foreign exchange volatility adjustment. E* is the fully adjusted exposure amount (taking into account the effect of the master netting agreement and volatility adjustments) (b) Using the Internal Models approach As an alternative to using the Supervisory volatility adjustments approach or the Own Estimates volatility adjustments approach in calculating the fully adjusted amount of the net exposure (E*) resulting from the application of an eligible master netting agreement covering repurchase transactions and/or securities or commodities lending or borrowing transactions, institutions may be permitted to use an Internal Models approach to the calculation of volatility adjustments which takes into account correlation effects between security positions subject to the master netting agreement as well as the liquidity of the instruments concerned. Internal models used in this approach shall provide estimates of the potential change in value of the unsecured exposure amount ( E - C). An institution may choose to use an Internal Models approach to the calculation of volatility adjustments independently of the choice it has made between the Standardised Approach and the IRB Foundation Approach to credit risk. However, if an institution seeks to use an Internal Models approach, it must do so for all counterparties and securities, excluding immaterial portfolios where it may use the Supervisory volatility adjustments approach or the Own Estimates 23

24 volatility adjustments approach subject to the conditions prescribed below for the use of such approaches under the Financial Collateral Comprehensive Method. The Internal Models approach is available to banks that have received supervisory recognition for an internal market risk model under Directive 93/6/EEC as amended. Banks which have not received supervisory recognition for use of models under that Directive, can separately apply for supervisory recognition to use their internal models for calculation of the potential change in value of the unsecured exposure amount for repo-style transactions. Internal models will only be accepted when a bank can prove the quality of its model to the supervisor through the backtesting of its output using one year of data. (The quantitative and qualitative criteria to be elaborated for the recognition of internal market risk models for repo-style transactions is in principle the same as under Directive 93/6/EEC. With regard to the liquidation period, the minimum will be 5-business days, rather than the 10-business days under that Directive.) A bank using an internal model will be required to backtest its output using a sample of 20 counterparties, identified on an annual basis. These counterparties should include the 10 largest as determined by the bank according to its own exposure measurement approach and 10 others selected at random. For each day and for each counterparty, the bank should compare the actual change in the counterparty s exposure over a 1-day horizon with the exposure value after risk mitigation (E*) using the internal models approach calculated as of the previous close of business. An exception occurs for each observation in which the actual change in exposure exceeds the internal model estimate. Depending on the number of exceptions in the observations for the 20 counterparties over the most recent 250 days (encompassing 5000 observations), the output of the internal model will be scaled up using a multiplier as provided in the table below. Zone Number of exceptions Multiplier 0 none (= 1) 20 none (= 1) Green Zone 40 none (= 1) 60 none (= 1) 80 none (= 1) Yellow Zone Red Zone 200 or more 3.0 The fully adjusted exposure (E*) for institutions using the Internal Models approach shall be calculated according to the following formula: E* = max {0, [( E - C) + (output from internal risk models x multiplier as appropriate)]} 24