Premiums Surplus Bond Proceeds Debt Exclusions
|
|
- Rodney McCarthy
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Christopher C. Harding Commissioner of Revenue Sean R. Cronin Senior Deputy Commissioner Premiums Surplus Bond Proceeds Debt Exclusions Prepared for Massachusetts Municipal Auditors and Accountants Association March 13, 2018 PRESENTER Patricia F. Hunt, Tax Counsel, Bureau of Municipal Finance Law, Division of Local Services, MA Department of Revenue Supporting a Commonwealth of Communities P.O. Box 9569 Boston, MA (617)
2
3 Supporting a Commonwealth of Communities Massachusetts Municipal Auditors and Accountants Association Premiums, Surplus Bond Proceeds and Debt Exclusions March 13, 2018 Agenda Borrowing - Overview Debt definition Legal authority to borrow Borrowing authorization votes Debt issuance Borrowing proceeds 1
4 Agenda Premiums Definition Treatment Before Municipal Modernization Act After Municipal Modernization Act Multi-purpose borrowings Restricted funds borrowings Borrowings subject to Prop 2 ½ debt exclusion Agenda Surplus borrowing proceeds Definition Treatment of surplus proceeds Restricted funds borrowings Borrowings subject to Prop 2 ½ debt exclusion 2
5 Borrowing What is Debt? Money one person, organization or government owes to another person, organization or government Borrower usually has a limited amount of time to repay with interest 3
6 What is Municipal Debt? Debt issued by cities, towns and districts to fund governmental obligations Funds advanced to government borrower by lender to finance asset acquisition or capital project Unconditional obligation to repay by government borrower by pledge of Full faith and credit (general obligation) raised by taxation if not funded (G.L. c. 59, 23; G.L. c. 44, 16) Particular revenue stream (revenue) of government borrower Tax exemption on interest for purchaser Legal Authority to Borrow No home rule power to borrow May only borrow as authorized by legislature Strict state regulation of borrowing Purposes Terms Payment structure Total authorized and outstanding debt (debt limit) 4
7 Legal Authority to Borrow General Laws G.L. c. 44, 1-28 (cities, towns & districts) G.L. c. 44B, 11 (Community Preservation Act) G.L. c. 71, 14D, 16(d) and (n) (regional school districts) G.L. c. 44, 28A (applicability of G.L. c. 44, issuance procedures to RSDs) G.L. c. 71B, 6(d) and (e) (MSBA school projects) G.L. c. 121B, 20 (redevelopment projects) Borrowing Authorization Cities, towns and improvement districts (G.L. c. 44, 1, 7 and 8) authorize debt by: 2/3 vote of all members of city council, with mayor s approval if required by charter 2/3 vote town or district meeting members present and voting by: Unanimous Actual counted 2/3 Declared 2/3 if authorized by by-law or vote (G.L. c. 39, 15) 5
8 Debt Issuance Local Officials Treasurer Prepare and issue notes or bonds Selectboard/Mayor/Regional School Committee/Prudential Committee Sign notes or bonds Debt Issuance Financial Advisors Assist municipal officials issue debt Advise on restrictions and options Work with bond counsel on legal and tax issues Prepare offering documents Prepare preliminary and final official statements Advise on selection of bids Prepare note and bond documents 6
9 Debt Issuance - Bond Counsel Advise on Borrowing purpose Town meeting warrant article, notices and vote Charter or by-laws State agency approvals (MFOB, DEP) Issue Legal Opinion Debt properly authorized and issued Interest is tax-exempt Borrowing Proceeds G.L. c. 44, 20 Expenditure of borrowing proceeds limited to Purposes specified in loan authorization Costs to prepare, issue and market bonds or notes Amended by Municipal Modernization Act: Treatment of premiums Use of surplus proceeds 7
10 Premiums What is a premium? When market borrowing interest rates are low, buyers (underwriters) of bonds (debt) may offer cash payments (premiums) in exchange for higher interest rate on bond to make bond more marketable A bond buyer may offer a premium to make its bid more competitive or to break a tie 8
11 What is a premium? Example City offers $2 million bond for sale Market interest rates are 1.5% Proposed buyer offers to buy bond at 2.5% rate of interest and to pay city premium of $100,000 If city accepts offer and issues $2m bond, bond will issue at 2.5% and city will receive cash from buyer of $2.1m (bond proceeds + premium) Premium Treatment Before Municipal Modernization Act - Premiums and accrued interest on bonds/notes sold before 11/7/2016 = general fund revenue Special rules for debt excluded under Proposition 2½ After Municipal Modernization Act - Premiums and accrued interest on bonds/notes sold on or after 11/7/2016 are not general fund revenue Two options for premium treatment 9
12 Premium Treatment (After Muni-Mod) - Two Options 1. Apply net premium (after issuance costs) and accrued interest to project costs and reduce borrowing authorization by like amount if legislative body vote so authorizes; or 2. Reserve net premium for appropriation for capital projects for which may borrow for equal/longer period than original loan Premium arising from restricted funds remains subject to restriction (Enterprise /CPA) If borrowing is subject of Prop 2½ debt exclusion, there may be a reduction in the annual excluded amount Example 1 (Premium Treatment) At its May, 2016 ATM, Anytown s legislative body voted to authorize $2 million borrowing for construction of a new police station On or after 11/7/16, the treasurer offers for sale $2 million permanent debt and receives an offer to buy the debt with a premium of $100,000 (after issuance costs) If the offer is accepted What are the options for treatment of the net premium? Do you need additional information? 10
13 Example 1 (Premium Treatment) Missing information --- Did legislative body vote include authority to apply net premium to project costs and reduce amount of borrowing authorization? If no, what are options for treatment of the $100,000 net premium? Example 1 (Premium Treatment) If legislative body vote did not authorize application of net premium to project costs and reduction of borrowing authorization by same amount Result = Only one option for treatment of the $100,000 net premium 1. Must reserve $100k net premium for appropriation for projects for which can borrow for same or longer term. Treasurer issues debt for $2 million and credits $2m borrowing proceeds to project construction fund. 11
14 Example 1 (Premium Treatment) If legislative body vote did authorize application of net premium to project costs and reduction of borrowing authorization by same amount: Result = Two options for net premium treatment 1. Apply $100k to project costs and reduce amount of debt authorization. Issue debt of $1.9 million and credit $1.9m + $100k premium to project construction fund. 2. Reserve $100k net premium for appropriation for projects for which can borrow for same or longer term. Issue debt of $2m and credit $2m to project construction fund. Example 2 (Premium Treatment) Multi-purpose bonds in the amount of $20,000,000 are sold on or after 11/7/16, for four projects: Project 1 - $500,000 Acquisition of Vehicles 5 yrs. Project 2 - $500,000 Acquisition of FD Pumper 20 yrs. Project 3 - $18,000,000 Acquisition of Land 30 yrs. Project 4 - $1,000,000 Municipal Building Construction 20 yrs. The legislative body votes authorizing the borrowings for projects 1, 2 and 4 included authority to apply premiums to project costs and reduce the amount of the borrowing authorization by like amount. A net premium of $1,000,000 is received. How is the net premium treated? 12
15 Example 2 (Premium Treatment) Step 1 - Allocate $1 million net premium among borrowing purposes - divide each original borrowing purpose amount by total original borrowing Borrowing Purpose Project 1 - Vehicles (5 yrs.) Project 2 FD Pumper (20 yrs.) Project 3 Land (30 yrs.) Project 4 Municipal Bldg. Constr. (20 yrs.) Original Allocation Percentage Borrowing Amount $500,000 $500,000/20,000,000 = 2.5% $500,000 $500,000/20,000,000 = 2.5% $18,000,000 $18,000,000/20,000,000 = 90% $1,000,000 $1,000,000/20,000,000 = 5% Net Premium Allocated 2.5% of $1m = $25, % of $1m = $25,000 90% of $1m = $900,000 5% of $1m = $50,000 $20,000, % $1,000,000 Example 2 (Premium Treatment) Step 2 Determine allowable treatment of allocated premium assigned to each project Same two options - If legislative body vote for project authorized application net premium to project costs and reduction of borrowing authorization, city/town may use this option. If not, must reserve net premium for appropriation for projects of equal or longer term. Project 1 - $500,000 Acquisition of Vehicles 5 yrs. Net premium allocated = $25,000 Yes borrowing vote authorization Project 2 - $500,000 Acquisition of FD Pumper 20 yrs. Net premium allocated = $25,000 Yes borrowing vote authorization Project 3 - $18,000,000 Acquisition of Land 30 yrs. Net premium allocated = $900,000 No borrowing vote authorization Project 4 - $1,000,000 Municipal Building Construction 20 yrs. Net premium allocated = $50,000 Yes borrowing vote authorization 13
16 Example 2 (Premium Treatment) Step 3 Determine Final Borrowing Amount - Apply allocated net premiums to project costs where borrowing vote so authorizes and reduce their borrowing authorizations Project 1 $500,000 Acquisition of Vehicles 5 yrs. Yes borrowing vote authorization Apply $25,000 net premium to project costs & reduce borrowing Final project debt issued $475,000 Project 2 - $500,000 Acquisition of FD Pumper 20 yrs. Yes borrowing vote authorization Apply $25,000 net premium to project costs & reduce borrowing Final project debt issued $475,000 Project 3 - $18,000,000 Acquisition of Land 30 yrs. No borrowing vote authorization $900,000 net premium must be reserved for appropriation for capital projects for which can borrow for 30 years or more Final project debt issued $18,000,000 Project 4 - $1,000,000 Municipal Building Construction 20 yrs. Yes borrowing vote authorization Apply $50,000 net premium to project costs & reduce borrowing Final project debt issued $950,000 Final amount multi-purpose bond = $19,900,000 Example 3 (Premium Treatment) Same multi-purpose borrowing as in the previous example, but none of the borrowing authorization votes for any of the projects include authority to apply net premium to project costs and reduce borrowing authorization How is premium treated? 14
17 Example 3 (Premium Treatment) Project 1 $500,000 Acquisition of Vehicles 5 yrs. No authority to apply premium to project costs Must reserve $25,000 net premium for appropriation for projects for which may borrow > 5 years Final project debt issued $500,000 Project 2 - $500,000 Acquisition of FD Pumper 20 yrs. No authority to apply premium to project costs Must reserve $25,000 net premium for appropriation for projects for which may borrow > 20 years Final project debt issued $500,000 Project 3 - $18,000,000 Acquisition of Land 30 yrs. No authority to apply premium to project costs Must reserve $900,000 net premium for appropriation for projects for which may borrow for > 30 years Final project debt issued $18,000,000 Project 4 - $1,000,000 Municipal Building Construction 20 yrs. No authority to apply premium to project costs Must reserve $50,000 net premium for appropriation for projects for which may borrow for > 20 years Final project debt issued $1,000,000 Final principal amount multi-purpose bond = $20,000,000 (No reduction from original) Example 3 (Premium Treatment) What will the reservations look like? Project 1 $25,000 net premium Project 2 - $25,000 net premium Project 3 - $900,000 net premium Project 4 - $50,000 net premium Reserved for appropriation for capital projects for which may borrow > 5 years Reserved for appropriation for capital projects for which may borrow > 20 years Reserved for appropriation for capital projects for which may borrow > 30 years Reserved for appropriation for capital projects for which may borrow > 20 years 15
18 Example 4 (Premium Treatment) Same multi-purpose borrowing as in the previous example, but the land acquisition project is funded with Community Preservation Funds Does this change the treatment of the $900k net premium allocated to this project? Example 4 (Premium Treatment) Yes - if project funded with restricted funds, restriction stays with reserved premium $18,000,000, 30-year borrowing to acquire land for community preservation purposes (CP funding). No borrowing vote authority to apply premium to project costs & reduce borrowing authorization. Must reserve $900k net premium for appropriation for capital projects For which may borrow for > 30 years Which may be funded with community preservation funds Recommendation of community preservation committee (CPC) required for appropriation 16
19 Treatment of Premiums Debt Excluded under Proposition 2 ½ (After Muni-Mod) Premium Treatment (Excluded Debt) Same Two Options 1. Apply net premium (after issuance costs) and accrued interest to project costs and reduce borrowing authorization by like amount if legislative body vote so authorizes; or 2. Reserve net premium for appropriation for capital projects for which may borrow for equal/longer period than original loan Premium arising from restricted funds remains subject to restriction (Enterprise /CPA) If borrowing is subject of Prop 2½ debt exclusion, there may be a reduction in the annual excluded amount 17
20 Premium Treatment (Excluded Debt) G.L. c. 44, 20 requires [a]dditions to the levy limit for a debt exclusion are restricted to the true interest cost incurred to finance the project. As a result, for excluded debt 1. If net premium & accrued interest applied to project costs and borrowing reduced, no reduction in amount of debt exclusion 2. If net premium & accrued interest reserved for appropriation, debt exclusion reduced as follows: a. If net premium & accrued interest at time of sale < $50,000, no reduction in annual excluded amount (de minimis exception) b. If net premium > $50,000, there will be a reduction in annual excluded amount Example 5 (Premiums and Excluded Debt) Legislative body authorizes $18 million borrowing for construction of police station, including authority to apply net premium & accrued interest to project costs and reduce borrowing authorization by same amount The voters approve debt exclusion for the borrowing under Prop 2 ½ On or after 11/7/16, treasurer offers the $18 million bond for sale and receives offer to buy the debt with premium of $800,000 What are the options for treatment of the net premium? 18
21 Example 5 (Premiums and Excluded Debt) Same Two Options 1. Apply net premium (after issuance costs) and accrued interest to project costs and reduce borrowing authorization by like amount if legislative body vote so authorizes; or 2. Reserve net premium for appropriation for capital projects for which may borrow for equal/longer period than original loan Premium arising from restricted funds remains subject to restriction (Enterprise /CPA) If borrowing is subject of Prop 2½ debt exclusion, there may be a reduction in the annual excluded amount Example 5 (Premiums and Excluded Debt) Option 1 - Apply $800k net premium to project costs and reduce borrowing authorization Treasurer reduces $18m borrowing by amount of $800k net premium to $17.2 million Treasurer receives $18m in cash ($17.2m borrowing proceeds + $800k premium) $18 million is credited to project construction fund to fund the project Because debt service will reflect the true interest cost incurred to finance the project, there is no reduction in the amount of the annual debt exclusion 19
22 Example 5 (Premiums and Excluded Debt) Option 2 - Reserve $800k net premium for appropriation (for projects for which may borrow for equal or longer time) Treasurer issues $18m debt Treasurer receives $18,800,000 cash ($18m borrowing proceeds + $800k premium) $18 million is credited to project construction fund to fund the project Debt service will not reflect true interest cost incurred to finance the project Because net premium > $50k, there will be a reduction in the annual debt exclusion No option to use reserved premium to pay debt service (as before Muni-Mod) Example 5 (Premiums and Excluded Debt) Calculation of annual debt exclusion reduction $18,000, year permanent bond issued $800,000 net premium (reserved for appropriation for projects for which may borrow equal / longer period) Interest payable over life of borrowing = $10,000,000 1 st fiscal year interest payment = $600,000 The reduction to fiscal year debt exclusion is Net premium $800,000 Divided by total interest over life of issue $10,000,000 Premium as % of interest 8% Fiscal Year Interest Due Premium Adjustment Fiscal Year Debt Exclusion Adjustment (Reduction) $600,000 8% $48,000 20
23 Example 5 (Premiums and Excluded Debt) Debt exclusion reduction ($48,000) Reported in Gateway on the DE-1 Gross debt service excludable for the fiscal year (principal and interest) is entered Debt exclusion reduction ($48,000) entered Net excluded debt service for the FY = gross debt service excludable minus $48,000 Calculation and exclusion reduction continues throughout life of the loan See IGR Treatment of Premiums Refunding Bonds 21
24 Premiums on Refunding Bonds Refunding bonds - used to refinance existing debt Separate statute governs refunding bonds - G.L. c. 44, s. 21A Requires proceeds of refunding bonds (including premiums received at issuance) be used to pay off bonds to be refunded, including principal, interest, redemption premium No option to reserve premium for appropriation; must use premium to pay off bonds to be refunded Flow Chart Treatment of Net Premiums and Accrued Interest Received on Bonds or Notes After Muni-Mod 22
25 Exercise Treatment of Premiums Exercise - Treatment of Premiums Multi-purpose bonds in the amount of $20,000,000 are sold on or after 11/7/16, for three projects: Project 1 - Acquisition of Land Community Preservation Funds - 30 yrs. $5,000,000 Project 2 - Municipal Building Construction 20 yrs. $10,000,000 Project 3 Dredging of Municipal Harbor 20 yrs. $5,000,000 The legislative body votes authorizing the borrowings for projects 2 and 3 included authority to apply premiums to project costs and reduce the amount of the borrowing authorization by like amount. A net premium of $1,000,000 is received. How is the net premium treated? 23
26 Exercise - Treatment of Premiums Step 1 Allocate the $1,000,000 net premium among the borrowing purposes Borrowing Purpose Project 1 - Acquisition of Land $5m - CP Funds - 30 yrs. Project 2 - Municipal Building Construction - $10m - 20 yrs. Project 3 Dredging of Municipal Harbor $5m - 20 yrs. Allocation Amount of Net Percentage (1) Premium Allocated (2) Note 1 Divide amount of each borrowing by total borrowing amount ($20,000,000) Note 2 Apply percentage to total net premium Exercise - Treatment of Premiums Step 1 Allocate the $1,000,000 net premium among the borrowing purposes Borrowing Purpose Project 1 - Acquisition of Land $5m CP Funds - 30 yrs. Project 2 - Municipal Building Construction - $10m - 20 yrs. Allocation Amount of Net Percentage (1) Premium Allocated (2) $5,000,000/ $20,000,000 = 25% $10,000,000/ $20,000,000 = 50% 25% of $1,000,000 = $250,000 50% of $1,000,000 = $500,000 Project 3 Dredging of $5,000,000/ 25% Municipal Harbor $5m - 20 yrs. $20,000,000 = 25% of $1,000,000 = $250,000 Total borrowing = $20,000, % $1,000,000 Note 1 Divide amount of each borrowing by total borrowing amount ($20,000,000) Note 2 Apply percentage to total net premium 24
27 Exercise - Treatment of Premiums Step 2 Determine allowable treatment of allocated premium assigned to each project If legislative body vote for project authorized application of net premium to project costs and reduction of borrowing authorization, city/town may use this option If not, must reserve net premium for appropriation for projects of equal or longer term Exercise - Treatment of Premiums Step 2 Determine allowable treatment of allocated premium assigned to each project Project 1 - Acquisition of Land $5,000,000 - CP Funds - 30 yrs. - $250,000 net premium No authority to apply net premium to project costs. Project 2 - Municipal Building Construction $10,000, yrs. - $500,000 net premium. Yes, authority to apply net premium to project costs. Project 3 Dredging of Municipal Harbor $5,000, yrs. - $250,000 net premium. Yes, authority to apply net premium to project costs. Allowable Premium Treatment 25
28 Exercise - Treatment of Premiums Step 2 Determine allowable treatment of allocated premium assigned to each project Project 1 - Acquisition of Land $5,000,000 - CP Funds - 30 yrs. - $250,000 net premium No authority to apply net premium to project costs. Project 2 - Municipal Building Construction $10,000, yrs. - $500,000 net premium. Yes, authority to apply net premium to project costs. Project 3 Dredging of Municipal Harbor $5,000, yrs. - $250,000 net premium. Yes, authority to apply net premium to project costs. Allowable Premium Treatment Only 1 option - Must reserve $250,000 net premium for appropriation for: projects for which may borrow for 30 yrs. or more and are fundable by the CPA and are recommended for appropriation by the CPC Two Options 1. Apply net premium to project costs and reduce amount of each borrowing authorization or 2. Reserve net premium for appropriation for projects for which may borrow for equal or longer time than original project Exercise - Treatment of Premiums Step 3 Determine Final Borrowing Amount - Apply allocated net premiums to project costs where borrowing vote authorizes and reduce their borrowing authorizations Project Project 1 - Acquisition of Land $5,000,000 - CP Funds - 30 yrs. - $250,000 net premium No authority to apply net premium to project costs. Project 2 - Municipal Building Construction $10,000, yrs. $500,000 net premium applied to project costs. Project 3 Dredging of Municipal Harbor $5,000, yrs. $250,000 net premium applied to project costs. Final amount multi-purpose bond Final Amount of Borrowing 26
29 Exercise - Treatment of Premiums Step 3 Determine Final Borrowing Amount - Apply allocated net premiums to project costs where borrowing vote authorizes and reduce their borrowing authorizations Project Project 1 - Acquisition of Land $5,000,000 - CP Funds - 30 yrs. - $250,000 net premium No authority to apply net premium to project costs. Project 2 - Municipal Building Construction $10,000, yrs. $500,000 net premium applied to project costs. Project 3 Dredging of Municipal Harbor $5,000, yrs. $250,000 net premium applied to project costs. Final Amount of Borrowing $5,000,000 $9,500,000 $4,750,000 Final amount multi-purpose bond $19,250,000 Surplus Borrowing Proceeds 27
30 Surplus Borrowing Proceeds Completed Project Surplus proceeds definition Difference between amount borrowed and amount spent for each purpose for which the city/town has authorized debt Does not matter if sold in multi-purpose bond Amount of surplus determined at the time of project completion Surplus Borrowing Proceeds Completed Project - Surplus Proceeds Treatment Governed by G.L. c. 44, s. 20 (amended by Muni-Mod) Law, as amended, applies to all surplus proceeds regardless when debt authorized/sold or purpose completed Surplus proceeds are available funds for restricted purposes Surplus proceeds arising from restricted funds project (e.g., enterprise or CPA funds) remain subject to restriction 28
31 Surplus Borrowing Proceeds Completed Project - Surplus Proceeds Treatment Two Options Surplus proceeds in any amount may be appropriated for purpose for which loan may be incurred for equal or longer period than original loan (same as before Muni-Mod) If surplus is $50,000 or less (at project completion), it may be applied without appropriation to pay any debt service with approval of CEO (Selectboard/Mayor) (added by Muni-Mod) Surplus Borrowing Proceeds Completed Project - Surplus Proceeds Treatment Excluded debt under Prop 2 ½ debt exclusion G.L. c. 44, s. 20 requires that debt exclusion reflect true interest cost of borrowing If surplus proceeds from excluded debt are applied to the payment of debt service or appropriated for purpose which is not debt excluded, the debt exclusion may be proportionately reduced 29
32 Surplus Borrowing Proceeds Completed Project Surplus Proceeds Treatment Excluded debt under Prop 2 ½ debt exclusion If surplus < $50,000, no reduction in annual debt exclusion - whether applied to payment of debt service or appropriated to non debt-excluded project (de minimis rule) If surplus > $50,000 and appropriated for another debt-excluded project, no reduction debt exclusion If surplus > $50,000 and any part of surplus appropriated for a non debt-excluded project, there will be a reduction in debt exclusion Surplus Borrowing Proceeds Calculation of annual debt exclusion reduction $18,000, year permanent bond issued Project completed - $180,000 surplus proceeds remain City/town appropriates surplus for capital projects for which may borrow for equal or longer term none are debt-excluded 1 st fiscal year interest payment = $600,000 Surplus Proceeds $180,000 Divided by total amount borrowed $18,000,000 Surplus Adjustment 1% Fiscal Year Interest Due Surplus Adjustment Fiscal Year Debt Exclusion Adjustment (Reduction) $600,000 1% $6,000 30
33 Surplus Borrowing Proceeds Debt exclusion reduction Reported in Gateway on the DE-1 ($6,000) Gross debt service excludable for the fiscal year (principal and interest) is entered Debt exclusion reduction ($6,000) is entered Net excluded debt service for the FY = gross debt service excludable minus $6,000 Calculation and exclusion reduction continues throughout life of the loan See IGR Surplus Borrowing Proceeds Abandoned/Discontinued Project Definition - Project not completed, but no outstanding liability, city/town (by 2/3 vote) votes to abandon/discontinue project Treatment of unexpended loan proceeds May be appropriated for purpose for which may borrow for equal/longer time than original No option to apply proceeds to payment of debt service 31
34 Surplus Borrowing Proceeds Abandoned/Discontinued Project For debt-excluded borrowings If proceeds < $50,000, may appropriate for non debt-excluded project and no reduction in debt exclusion (de minimis rule) If proceeds > $50,000, appropriation for non debt-excluded project will result in reduction to debt exclusion Calculate and report reduction in same manner as for completed project surplus proceeds Exercise Surplus Borrowing Proceeds 32
35 Exercise - Surplus Borrowing Proceeds Facts $2 million borrowing authorized for construction of a police station $2 million permanent debt issued Project completed and $75,000 surplus Town meeting appropriates $25,000 from the surplus for another capital project for which town may borrow for a similar period of time Question - May the town apply the remaining $50,000 surplus to the payment of debt service with CEO approval? Exercise - Surplus Borrowing Proceeds No may only apply surplus to payment of debt service if surplus proceeds at time of project completion were < $50,000. Here, $75,000 surplus. Surplus Proceeds Treatment Completed Project Surplus proceeds in any amount may be appropriated for purpose for which loan may be incurred for equal or longer period than original loan If surplus is $50,000 or less (at project completion), may be applied without appropriation to pay any debt service with approval of CEO (Selectboard/Mayor) 33
36 Exercise - Surplus Borrowing Proceeds Facts $2 million borrowing authorized for acquisition of land with CPA funds $2 million permanent debt issued Project completed and $50,000 surplus Question - May the town apply the $50,000 surplus to the payment of any debt service with CEO approval? Exercise - Surplus Borrowing Proceeds No Town may not apply the $50,000 surplus to payment of any debt service When surplus proceeds arise from restricted funds project (CPA funds), surplus remains subject to restriction Town may only apply the $50,000 surplus to payment of debt service for another community preservation borrowing Upon recommendation of CPC and Approval of chief executive officer 34
37 Pending Legislation - SD 2466 & Supp. Budget Notes (BANs) Apply net premium & accrued interest to first payment of interest Bonds Net premiums and accrued interest < $50,000 may be applied to pay indebtedness with CEO approval (excluded and non-excluded debt) If < $50,000 & not applied to indebtedness or if > $50,000: Excluded debt Must apply premium & accrued interest to project costs & reduce borrowing (leg. body auth. no longer needed) Non excluded debt - Two options: Apply premium & accrued interest to project costs & reduce borrowing (leg. body auth. no longer needed) Reserve for appropriation to pay costs of project for which city/town has or may authorize a borrowing (borrowing period no longer relevant) The End 35
38 Flow Chart - Treatment of Net Premiums and Accrued Interest Received on Bonds or Notes Sold on or after November 7, See IGR and IGR Under G.L. c. 44, 20 (after the Municipal Modernization Act), net premiums and accrued interest on bonds or notes sold on or after 11/7/2016 are not general fund revenue. They must either be: 1. Applied to the costs of the project being financed by the bonds or notes and reduce the amount authorized to be borrowed for the project by like amount (only if the legislative body borrowing vote so authorizes); or 2. Reserved in separate fund for appropriation for capital projects: Project must be one for which may borrow for equal or longer period than loan for which premium received Premium arising from restricted funds project remains subject to restriction If borrowing is the subject of an approved Proposition 2½ debt exclusion, there may be a reduction in the annual excluded amount because G.L. c. 44, s. 20 requires [a]dditions to the levy limit for a debt exclusion are restricted to the true interest cost incurred to finance the excluded project. FLOW CHART 1 Was the borrowing a refunding bond issued under G.L. c. 44, 21A? If yes, go to 7. If no, go to 2. 2 Was the borrowing a single purpose borrowing? If yes, go to 3. If no, go to 8. 3 Did the legislative body vote that authorized the borrowing include authority to apply the net premium and any accrued interest to the costs of the project being financed by the bonds or notes and reduce the amount authorized to be borrowed for the project by like amount? If yes, go to 4. If no, go to 5. 4 Treasurer is to apply the net premium and any accrued interest to pay costs of the project being financed by the bonds or notes and reduce the amount authorized to be borrowed for the project by like amount. 5 Net premium and accrued interest must be reserved for appropriation for a project for which the city, town or district has authorized a borrowing, or may authorize a borrowing, for an equal or longer period of time than the original loan: a. AND - If the borrowing was funded through restricted funds, e.g., community preservation funds or enterprise funds, the reserved net premium and accrued interest remain subject to relevant restriction. The funds may be appropriated for capital projects for which the restricted funds may be spent and for which a loan has been, or may be, authorized for an equal or longer period of time than the loan for which the premiums were received. If the original borrowing is financed with community preservation funds, a recommendation of the community preservation committee is also required for any appropriation of the reserved premiums; b. AND - If the borrowing was the subject of an approved Proposition 2½ debt exclusion, go to 6. 6 When net premiums and accrued interest received on a borrowing subject to an approved Proposition 2 ½ debt exclusion are reserved for appropriation for capital projects for which a loan has been, or may be, authorized for an equal or longer period of time than the loan for which the premiums were received, then the amount of the annual debt exclusion will be reduced by a premium adjustment as follows: a. When the total net premium and accrued interest received at the time of sale is $50,000 or less, there will be no reduction in the annual excluded amount. (de minimis exception). b. When the total net premium and accrued interest received at the time of the sale is more than $50,000, there will be a reduction in the excluded amount calculated as shown in Exhibit A* below. Note: Net premiums and accrued interest reserved for appropriation are not available for appropriation for the payment of annual debt service of the project.
39 Flow Chart - Treatment of Net Premiums and Accrued Interest Received on Bonds or Notes Sold on or after November 7, See IGR and IGR Refunding Bonds - G.L. c. 44, 21A governs premiums received on refunding bonds and requires all proceeds of refunding bonds be used to pay off the bonds to be refunded. Proceeds of refunding bonds include premiums and accrued interest. Therefore, they must be used to pay off the bonds to be refunded. 8 Multi-Purpose Borrowings - For multi-purpose borrowings, the net premium and accrued interest are allocated to each individual borrowing based upon the proportion that the individual borrowing bears to the total amount borrowed. How a pro-rated premium is treated depends upon the borrowing to which it is allocated. If the borrowing is a refunding bond, see number 7 above for its treatment. For other borrowings, start with number 3 above and work your way through the flow chart. *Exhibit A Calculation of Premium Adjustment and Debt Exclusion Reduction A city or town, on or after November 7, 2016, sells permanent bonds payable in 20 years in the total principal amount of $18,000,000. It receives a net premium as part of the sale in the amount of $800,000 which is reserved for the appropriation of capital projects. The total interest payable over the life of the borrowing will be $10,000,000. The interest payable for the fiscal year is $600,000. The calculation to determine the adjustment of interest for the fiscal year debt exclusion is as follows: Calculation of Premium as Percentage of Interest Cost Net Premium $800,000 Divided by total interest over life of issue $10,000,000 Premium as % of interest 8% Calculation of adjustment of interest for debt exclusion: Fiscal Year Premium Debt Exclusion Adjustment Interest Due Adjustment (Reduction) $600,000 8% $48,000 The amount of the gross debt service excludable for the fiscal year (principal and interest) and the amount of the exclusion reduction ($48,000) are entered on the DE-1. The net excluded debt service will be the gross debt service excludable minus $48,000. The city or town will be required to continue to apply this premium adjustment to reduce the amount of the annual debt exclusion throughout the life of the borrowing.
Supporting a Commonwealth of Communities. Accountants School at UMASS Amherst
Supporting a Commonwealth of Communities Accountants School at UMASS Amherst March 12 14, 2018 INTRODUCTION This booklet was prepared by the staff of the Division of Local Services Bureau of Accounts to
More informationMassachusetts Municipal Auditors and Accountants Association Annual Meeting South Yarmouth, Massachusetts June 11, 2018 Peter Frazier, Managing
Massachusetts Municipal Auditors and Accountants Association Annual Meeting South Yarmouth, Massachusetts June 11, 2018 Peter Frazier, Managing Director Bonds and Notes An interest bearing promise to pay
More informationCHAPTER 3 PROPOSITION 2½ AGENDA AND OBJECTIVES
CHAPTER 3 PROPOSITION 2½ AGENDA AND OBJECTIVES A. PRESENTATION TOPICS 1. Definition and calculation of the annual levy limit. 2. Definition and calculation of new growth. 3. Definition and calculation
More information16 th Annual Riley Fletcher Basic Municipal Law Seminar Austin, Texas Thursday, February 5, 2015
16 th Annual Riley Fletcher Basic Municipal Law Seminar Austin, Texas Thursday, February 5, 2015 Kuruvilla (K.O.) Oommen Deputy City Attorney City of Irving, Texas Handbook for Mayors and Councilmembers
More informationFINANCIAL APPLICATION
Making a Difference for Maine Communities FINANCIAL APPLICATION for General Obligation Borrowers Longterm bonds for Public purpose financing of: Construction Projects Capital Improvements Acquisitions
More informationLOUISIANA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE Title 71 - Treasury Public Funds Part III. Bond Commission Debt Management. Page The Commission - Purpose 1
LOUISIANA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE Title 71 - Treasury Public Funds Part III. Bond Commission Debt Management Page The Commission - Purpose 1 Original Rules Bond Commission Meetings 1 Application Information
More informationMunicipal Modernization Act Association of Town Finance Committees October 15, 2016
Supporting a Commonwealth of Communities Municipal Modernization Act Association of Town Finance Committees October 15, 2016 Municipal Modernization Goals Streamline state oversight Eliminate or update
More informationProposition 2½ Ballot Questions Requirements and Procedures
Massachusetts Department of Revenue Division of Local Services Alan LeBovidge, Commissioner Joseph J. Chessey, Jr., Deputy Commissioner Proposition 2½ Ballot Questions Requirements and Procedures Property
More informationLEGAL COMPLIANCE MANUAL PUBLIC INDEBTEDNESS
PUBLIC INDEBTEDNESS LEGAL COMPLIANCE MANUAL PUBLIC INDEBTEDNESS Introduction The power of a government unit to incur indebtedness is governed by statutory and home rule charter provisions. Statutory provisions
More informationCITY OF TEXARKANA, TEXAS
CITY OF TEXARKANA, TEXAS Debt Management Policy The City of Texarkana, Texas (the City ) recognizes that the foundation of any wellmanaged debt program is a comprehensive debt management and post issuance
More information1. The City of Boise shall annually adopt a balanced budget where operating revenues are equal to, or exceed, operating expenditures.
Accounting, Auditing, and Financial Reporting Policies 1. The shall promote organized financial planning, budgeting, and accounting to assure disclosure of all financial transactions and to facilitate
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 203. Financing and Funds... 2 Subchapter A. General Provisions... 2 Subchapter B. Unemployment Compensation Fund...
TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 203. Financing and Funds... 2 Subchapter A. General Provisions... 2 Sec. 203.001. Definitions... 2 Sec. 203.002. Duties of Comptroller... 2 Sec. 203.003. Comptroller s Bond Liability...
More informationMONTANA BOARD OF INVESTMENTS INTERCAP PROGRAM. Page A1 A3...INTERCAP Loan Policy Page E1 E6... Electronic INTERCAP Loan Application
MONTANA BOARD OF INVESTMENTS INTERCAP PROGRAM This file was created in Microsoft Word and contains the following items: Page A1 A3...INTERCAP Loan Policy Page E1 E6... Electronic INTERCAP Loan Application
More information11/8/2013. Bonds 101. Presentation Overview. What is a Municipal Bond?
Bonds 101 Gary Olsen, Senior Financial Advisor/Vice President Jodie Zesbaugh, Financial Advisor Ehlers 2013 MASBO Fall Conference November 15, 2013 1 Presentation Overview Introduction and Background Information
More informationLOCAL REVENUE SOURCES
Statement of Purpose Scope Objective Type of Authorized Debt Unlimited Tax Bonds Maintenance Tax Notes and Tax Anticipation Notes The purpose of the District s debt management policy is to establish and
More informationFunding Capital Expenditures. A discussion of key terms and considerations for funding capital projects
Funding Capital Expenditures A discussion of key terms and considerations for funding capital projects Discuss Key Funding Tools I. Capital Exclusion II. Debt Exclusion III.Free Cash (available reserves)
More informationDebt Service Fund Overview
The Debt Service Fund is used to manage payments on all general government related debt. Required by Texas law, the Debt Service Fund is linked to the Interest and Sinking (I&S) component of the ad valorem
More informationCapital Finance for Local Governments: General Obligation Bonds
Capital Finance for Local Governments: General Obligation Bonds Kara Millonzi millonzi@sog.unc.edu January 2015 General Obligation (GO) Bonds Security Legal Projects Voter Approval LGC Approval Bond Counsel
More informationPACE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION AND GUIDELINES
PACE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION AND GUIDELINES I. Introduction In May 2009, the Vermont legislature approved Act 45 (as amended by Act 47 in May 2011), authorizing municipalities to create Property Assessed Clean
More information$5,595,000 TOWN OF FAIRHAVEN Massachusetts GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS
FINAL OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED APRIL 14, 2015 Moody s Investors Service: Aa2 (See Rating ) In the opinion of Locke Lord LLP, Bond Counsel, based upon an analysis of existing law and assuming, among other
More informationCOUNCIL POLICY NO. C-2
Exhibit 1 COUNCIL POLICY NO. C-2 TITLE: POLICY: DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY See attachment. REFERENCE: Finance Committee Report dated 8/17/15, Agenda Item No. 3.a (Supplants Finance Committee Reports dated
More informationDATE ISSUED: 7/7/ of 11 LDU CA(LOCAL)-X
FISL MANAGEMENT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Purpose Scope Objective Debt Financing Guidelines Definition of Debt Cash Flow Financing Short-Term Debt Long-Term Debt The purpose of the District s debt management
More informationState Revolving Fund (SRF) Clean Water Program Application Instructions for Municipal Borrowers
State Revolving Fund (SRF) Clean Water Program Application Instructions for Municipal Borrowers These instructions have been designed to help you fill out the State Revolving Fund(SRF) Clean Water Program
More informationCITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, NEVADA DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY IN ACCORDANCE WITH NRS (C)
CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, NEVADA DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY IN ACCORDANCE WITH NRS 350.013 1(C) JUNE 30, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary of Debt... 2 Affordability of Debt... 8 General Obligation Bonds Supported
More informationCITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, NEVADA DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY IN ACCORDANCE WITH NRS (C)
CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, NEVADA DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY IN ACCORDANCE WITH NRS 350.013 1(C) JUNE 30, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY NRS 350.013 Subsection 1(c)... 1 Summary of Debt... 2 Affordability
More informationFIDELITY CAPITAL MARKETS
New Issue OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED JUNE 16, 2016 Rating: See Rating herein. Standard & Poor s Ratings Group: AA+ In the opinion of Locke Lord LLP, Bond Counsel, based upon an analysis of existing law and
More informationDEBT POLICY SAN JUAN COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT #3 D/B/A/ORCAS ISLAND HEALTH CARE DISTRICT. Section I. Purpose and Overview
SAN JUAN COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT #3 D/B/A/ORCAS ISLAND HEALTH CARE DISTRICT DEBT POLICY Section I. Purpose and Overview This Debt Policy is adopted by the San Juan County Public Hospital District
More informationDebt Management Policy
Debt Management Policy Policy Number: 01-07 Date: January 9, 2017 Purpose: The City of DeKalb developed this Debt Management Policy to help ensure the City s credit worthiness and to provide a functional
More information$21,000,000* TOWN OF LONGMEADOW Massachusetts
New Issue Moody s Investors Service, Inc.: (See Rating ) NOTICE OF SALE AND PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 19, 2017 In the opinion of Locke Lord LLP, Bond Counsel, based upon an analysis
More informationCITY OF BROCKTON, MASSACHUSETTS $7,820,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION STATE QUALIFIED MUNICIPAL PURPOSE LOAN OF 2011 BONDS
New Issue OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED MAY 3, 2011 Rating: See Rating herein. Moody s Investors Service, Inc.: Aa2 In the opinion of Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge LLP, Bond Counsel, based upon an analysis
More informationFINAL OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED DECEMBER 10, $21,642,000 TOWN OF TEWKSBURY Massachusetts GENERAL OBLIGATION MUNICPAL PURPOSE LOAN OF 2009 BONDS
NEW ISSUE Standard & Poor s Ratings Services: AA- (See Rating ) FINAL OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED DECEMBER 10, 2009 In the opinion of Bond Counsel, based upon an analysis of existing law and assuming, among
More informationIC Chapter 14. Miscellaneous Provisions
IC 5-1-14 Chapter 14. Miscellaneous Provisions IC 5-1-14-1 Bonds, notes, or warrants not subject to maximum interest rate limitations Sec. 1. (a) Any bonds, notes, or warrants, whether payable from property
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of April 22, 2017
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of April 22, 2017 DATE: April 21, 2017 SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2018 County Budget Resolution and Appropriations Resolution C. M. RECOMMENDATIONS:
More informationAssembly Bill No. 5 Committee on Government Affairs
Assembly Bill No. 5 Committee on Government Affairs CHAPTER... AN ACT relating to local improvements; providing for the creation of certain local improvement districts that include an energy efficiency
More informationOAKLAND OVERSIGHT BOARD
OAKLAND OVERSIGHT BOARD R E SOLUTION N O. 2018- A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF REFUNDING BONDS BY THE OAKLAND REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY, AND MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE
More informationLOCAL FINANCE NOTICE
CFO 2003-3 Notice Number New Jersey Department of Community Affairs Division of Local Government Services 3/20/2003 LOCAL FINANCE NOTICE Date JAMES E. MCGREEVEY SUSAN BASS LEVIN MATTHEW U. WATKINS GOVERNOR
More informationP.L. 2004, CHAPTER 68, approved June 30, 2004 Assembly, No. 3108
P.L. 00, CHAPTER, approved June 0, 00 Assembly, No. - - C.:B-. to :B-. - Note 0 0 AN ACT authorizing the issuance of cigarette tax securitization bonds, notes or other obligations by the New Jersey Economic
More informationANNUAL DEBT GUIDE. Palm Beach County, Florida C L ERK & C O MP TRO L L ER S O F F IC E F ISC AL Y EA R E N D ED S EP T EMB E R 30, 2009
ANNUAL DEBT GUIDE Palm Beach County, Florida P R EP A R ED B Y TH E C L ERK & C O MP TRO L L ER S O F F IC E FOR THE F ISC AL Y EA R E N D ED S EP T EMB E R 30, 2009 PREPARED BY THE CLERK & COMPTROLLER
More informationFIDELITY CAPITAL MARKETS
New Issue Moody s Investors Service: Aa3 Standard & Poor s Ratings Services: AA+ (See Ratings herein) FINAL OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED APRIL 8, 2010 In the opinion of Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge LLP, Bond
More informationMASSACHUSETTS SCHOOL BUILDING AUTHORITY. Financial Statements and Required Supplementary Information. June 30, 2015
Financial Statements and Required Supplementary Information (With Independent Auditors Report Thereon) Table of Contents Page(s) Independent Auditors Report 1 2 Management s Discussion and Analysis Required
More informationCITY OF FITCHBURG, MASSACHUSETTS. Annual Financial Statements. For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
CITY OF FITCHBURG, MASSACHUSETTS Annual Financial Statements For the Year Ended June 30, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT 1 MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 4 BASIC FINANCIAL
More informationFINANCING CAPITAL PROJECTS: Strategies to Make Your Project a Reality
FINANCING CAPITAL PROJECTS: Strategies to Make Your Project a Reality Presentation at the 63 rd Annual Conference Intended for Information Purposes Only See Disclaimers Provided Herein December 7, 2016
More information$3,971,000 TOWN OF MERRIMAC, MASSACHUSETTS General Obligation State Qualified Municipal Purpose Loan of 2013 Bonds Book-Entry-Only Bank-Qualified
NEW ISSUE Rating: Moody s Investors Service State Qualified Bond Rating: Aa2 Stable Outlook Underlying Rating: A1 FINAL OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED NOVEMBER 20, 2013 In the opinion of Edwards Wildman Palmer
More informationFINAL OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED NOVEMBER 19, 2013 $ 2,188,000 CITY OF AMESBURY, MASSACHUSETTS
Rating: Standard & Poor s AA FINAL OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED NOVEMBER 19, 2013 NEW ISSUE In the opinion of Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP, Bond Counsel, based upon an analysis of existing law and assuming,
More information$5,539,192 TOWN OF SEEKONK Massachusetts
FINAL OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED OCTOBER 12, 2016 S&P Global Ratings: AA+ (See Rating herein) In the opinion of Locke Lord LLP, Bond Counsel, based upon an analysis of existing law and assuming, among other
More informationDEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS BACKGROUND In North Carolina, an agency known as the Local Government Commission, the LGC, oversees local government bonded debt. The LGC must approve all bonded debt of local
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of April 21, 2007 DATE: April 4, 2007 SUBJECT: Sale of General Obligation Public C. M. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt, by roll call vote, the attached
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 142 Article 9 1
Article 9. State Capital Facilities Finance Act. 142-80. Short title. This Article may be cited as the State Capital Facilities Finance Act. (2003-284, s. 46.2; 2003-314, s. 1; 2004-203, s. 79.) 142-81.
More informationHOLDEN BEACH, NORTH CAROLINA TOWN OF HOLDEN BEACH. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS June 30, 2017
HOLDEN BEACH, NORTH CAROLINA TOWN OF HOLDEN BEACH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS June 30, 2017 TOWN OF HOLDEN BEACH, NORTH CAROLINA For the Year Ended June 30, 2017 Mayor: Commissioners: J. Alan Holden John Fletcher
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of January 21, 2006 DATE: January 5, 2006 SUBJECT: Sale of General Obligation Public C. M. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt, by roll call vote, the attached
More informationDecember, His Excellency, Governor John H. Lynch and the Honorable Council State House Concord, New Hampshire 03301
December, 2010 His Excellency, Governor John H. Lynch and the Honorable Council State House Concord, New Hampshire 03301 In accordance with the provisions of RSA 35-A:26, I submit herewith the Annual Report
More informationAccrued Interest A currently unpaid amount of interest that has accumulated since the last payment on a bond or other fixed-income security.
Accrued Interest A currently unpaid amount of interest that has accumulated since the last payment on a bond or other fixed-income security. Ad Valorem Tax Translated as according to value, it is a levy
More information1. POLICY 2. PROCEDURES REGARDING BONDS. 2.1 Issuance of Bonds
ISSUANCE AND RETIREMENT OF BONDS, NOTES AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS OF THE CONNECTICUT RESOURCES RECOVERY AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS POLICY AND PROCEDURE No. 015 1. POLICY It is the policy of the Connecticut
More informationJune 25, 1987 ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION NO Eugene Barrett Commissioner Banking Department 700 Jackson, Suite 300 Topeka, Kansas Re:
ROBERT T. STEPHAN ATTORNEY GENERAL June 25, 1987 ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION NO. 87-98 Eugene Barrett Commissioner Banking Department 700 Jackson, Suite 300 Topeka, Kansas 66603-3714 Re: Banks and Banking
More informationCITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE ORDINANCE NO. 2711
CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE ORDINANCE NO. 2711 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE, WASHINGTON, PROVIDING FOR THE SUBMISSION TO THE VOTERS OF THE CITY AT A GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER
More informationCITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT. DEPARTMENT: Administrative Services MEETING DATE: January 17, PREPARED BY: Emy-Rose Hanna, Management Analyst
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT DEPARTMENT: Administrative Services MEETING DATE: January 17, 2017 PREPARED BY: Emy-Rose Hanna, Management Analyst AGENDA LOCATION: CC-6 TITLE: Update to Debt Management Policy
More informationCITY OF HOLYOKE, MASSACHUSETTS. Annual Financial Statements. For the Year Ended June 30, 2009
CITY OF HOLYOKE, MASSACHUSETTS Annual Financial Statements For the Year Ended June 30, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT 1 MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 3 BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
More informationTown of East Greenwich. Overview of Municipal Bonds
Town of East Greenwich Overview of Municipal Bonds Table of Contents East Greenwich s Bond Rating Section 1 Existing Debt Service Section 2 Ways in Which to Measure Debt Section 3 Basics of Issuing Bonds
More informationGeorgia Studies. Unit 8 Local Governments. Lesson 5 Local Governments. Study Presentation
Georgia Studies Unit 8 Local Governments Lesson 5 Local Governments Study Presentation Lesson 5 - Local Governments ESSENTIAL QUESTION Why do local governments collect and use taxes? Why are there different
More informationTOWN OF MIDDLEBOROUGH, MASSACHUSETTS
BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS WITH INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
More informationUniform Massachusetts Accounting System
Uniform Massachusetts Accounting System July, 2013 Massachusetts Department of Revenue Division of Local Services Amy A. Pitter, Commissioner Robert G. Nunes, Deputy Commissioner & Director of Municipal
More informationTOWN OF LEE, MASSACHUSETTS. Financial Statements and Supplementary Information. June 30, Independent Auditors' Report 3-4
TOWN OF LEE, MASSACHUSETTS Financial Statements and Supplementary Information June 30, 2016 Independent Auditors' Report 3-4 Management s Discussion and Analysis 5 Government-Wide Financial Statements
More information$1,950,000 TOWN OF AMHERST Massachusetts
NEW ISSUE Standard & Poor s Ratings Services: AA+ (see Rating herein) FINAL OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED FEBRUARY 3, 2015 In the opinion of Locke Lord LLP (successor by merger to Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP),
More informationSENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY 217th LEGISLATURE
LEGISLATIVE FISCAL ESTIMATE [Third Reprint] SENATE, No. 1711 STATE OF NEW JERSEY 217th LEGISLATURE DATED: JUNE 9, 2016 SUMMARY Synopsis: Type of Impact: Agencies Affected: The Municipal Stabilization and
More informationTOWN OF MARSHFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS $2,792,000* GENERAL OBLIGATION MUNICIPAL PURPOSE LOAN OF 2018 BONDS
This Preliminary Official Statement and the information contained herein are subject to completion or amendment. Under no circumstances shall this Preliminary Official Statement constitute an offer to
More informationNOTICE OF SALE $5,360,000 * PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT REFUNDING (SERIAL) BONDS, 2019 OF THE VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER, NEW YORK
NOTICE OF SALE $5,360,000 * PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT REFUNDING (SERIAL) BONDS, 2019 OF THE VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER, NEW YORK Sale Date: Place of Sale: April 11, 2019, 11:00 A.M. (Prevailing
More informationBonds 101. Michigan Association of School Boards. November 10, PFM Financial Advisors LLC. 555 Briarwood Circle Suite 333
Bonds 101 Michigan Association of School Boards November 10, 2017 PFM Financial Advisors LLC 555 Briarwood Circle Suite 333 P: 734-994-9700 F: 734-994-9710 Ann Arbor, MI 48108 www.pfm.com PFM 1 Overview
More informationISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 411 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON UNLIMITED TAX GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, 2017 RESOLUTION NO. 1095
ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 411 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON UNLIMITED TAX GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, 2017 RESOLUTION NO. 1095 A Resolution of the Board of Directors of Issaquah School District No. 411, King
More informationGENERAL OBLIGATION MUNICIPAL PURPOSE LOAN OF 2018 BONDS
This Preliminary Official Statement and the information contained herein are subject to completion or amendment. Under no circumstances shall this Preliminary Official Statement constitute an offer to
More informationCITY OF WOONSOCKET, RHODE ISLAND. Annual Financial Report. Year Ended June 30, 2016
Annual Financial Report Year Ended Year Ended Table of Contents Introductory Section... 1 List of Elected and Appointed Officials... 2 Organizational Chart... 3 Financial Section... 4 Independent Auditors
More informationBetterments and Special Assessments Assessment and Collection Procedures
Massachusetts Department of Revenue Division of Local Services Frederick A. Laskey, Commissioner Joseph J. Chessey, Jr., Deputy Commissioner Betterments and Special Assessments Assessment and Collection
More informationMUNICIPAL BONDS IN TEXAS and THE BOND SALE PROCESS
MUNICIPAL BONDS IN TEXAS and THE BOND SALE PROCESS Government Treasurers Organization of Texas Winter Seminar December 5, 2017 9:30 AM 10:30 AM Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated ( Baird ) is providing
More informationDEBT POLICY Policy 520
DEBT POLICY Policy 520 Table of Contents.1 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES... 1.2 DEBT PLANNING... 1.3 CREDIT OBJECTIVES... 1 3.1 Credit Ratings... 1 3.2 Credit Enhancement... 2.4 PURPOSE, TYPE AND USE OF DEBT...
More information2/24/2018 PAY AS YOU GO VS. DEBT KNOW YOUR BUDGET AND CAPITAL PLAN
1 General operations of local government are financed through Current Fund appropriations (police, fire, admin., etc.) Capital improvements are financed through the Capital Fund (road imp., heavy equipment
More informationRESOLUTION NO
RESOLUTION NO. 031717-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE DESERT COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT AUTHORIZING THE SALE AND ISSUANCE OF NOT TO EXCEED $145,000,000 AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF DESERT
More informationTax-Exempt Financing for Wyoming Municipalities
Tax-Exempt Financing for Wyoming Municipalities Fred Marienthal Partner Ryan Jardine Partner November 2, 2017 1 Tax-Exempt for Whom? Tax-Exempt financing benefits a municipality as it is able to borrow
More informationLOS ANGELES COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT. June 30, 2012 and Los Angeles County, California:
June 30, 2012 and 2011 Los Angeles County, California: East Los Angeles College Los Angeles City College Los Angeles Harbor College Los Angeles Mission College Pierce College Los Angeles Southwest College
More informationMassachusetts Municipal Auditors and Accountants Association Annual School March 17, 2015 Financial Statements and Your Bond Rating Actual Case Study
Massachusetts Municipal Auditors and Accountants Association Annual School March 17, 2015 Financial Statements and Your Bond Rating Actual Case Study Roselli, Clark and Associates Tony Roselli, CPA, CGMA
More informationFinancing Alternatives
Topics Addressed Financing Alternatives Debt Options For Ohio Political Subdivisions Matt Stout 614.227.8861 mstout@bricker.com Jacquelin Lewis 614.227.7735 jlewis@bricker.com Sources of funding capital
More informationSTATE OF NEVADA STATE BOARD OF FINANCE
STATE OF NEVADA STATE BOARD OF FINANCE AUDIT REPORT Table of Contents Page Executive Summary... 1 Introduction... 3 Background... 3 Scope and Objective... 3 Findings and Recommendation... 4 Regulations
More informationCity of Tucson Finance
City of Tucson Finance Proudly Presented By: Silvia Amparano, CPA, CPFO Finance Director Association of Government Accountants Southern Arizona Chapter October 12, 2016 1 Agenda Governmental Accounting
More informationPublic Finance Tools to Fund Infrastructure February 22, 2018
Public Finance Tools to Fund Infrastructure February 22, 2018 August 15, 2016 Presentation Title Second Line 1 Introductions JOAN MICHAELS AGUILAR DEPUTY CITYMANAGER ADMINSERVICES CITY OF DIXON KENNETH
More informationMotor Vehicle Excise Information
Motor Vehicle Excise Information Our office has produced this booklet as a public service. There may be other offices to contact for specific information regarding your excise tax bill. The following offices
More informationA Wareham basic primer on Capital Planning D. Trudell
A Wareham basic primer on Capital Planning D. Trudell 7-13-2011 Town Charter 2-5 (d) Capital Planning Committee There shall be a capital planning committee which shall consist of seven members, chosen
More informationBonds 101: An Overview of City Financing
Bonds 101: An Overview of City Financing Presentation to the City of Yakima August 11, 2016 Deanna Gregory, Partner, Pacifica Law Group LLP (206) 245-1700, Deanna.Gregory@pacificalawgroup.com Lindsay Sovde,
More informationTOWN OF MARSHFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS $2,792,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION MUNICIPAL PURPOSE LOAN OF 2018 BONDS
OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED JULY 11, 2018 New Issue Rating: See Rating herein. S&P Global Ratings: AA+ In the opinion of Locke Lord LLP, Bond Counsel, based upon an analysis of existing law and assuming,
More informationMotor Vehicle Excise Information
Motor Vehicle Excise Information William Francis Galvin Secretary of the Commonwealth updated 4/13/17 William Francis Galvin Secretary of the Commonwealth Citizen Information Service One Ashburton Place,
More informationSenate Bill No. 1 Committee of the Whole
Senate Bill No. 1 Committee of the Whole CHAPTER... AN ACT relating to commerce; providing for the issuance of transferable tax credits and the partial abatement of certain taxes to a project that satisfies
More informationAPPENDIX A. Financial Statements. City of Toronto Sinking Funds December 31, 2011
APPENDIX A Financial Statements City of Toronto Sinking Funds December 31, 2011 July [x], 2012 Independent Auditor s Report To the Chair of the City of Toronto Sinking Funds Committee We have audited the
More informationGREATER ATTLEBORO-TAUNTON REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY MASSACHUSETTS
NOTICE OF SALE and PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT In the opinion of Locke Lord LLP, Bond Counsel, based upon an analysis of existing law and assuming, among other matters, compliance with certain covenants,
More informationMARLBOROUGH FIRE DISTRICT, IN THE TOWN OF MARLBOROUGH, ULSTER COUNTY, NEW YORK NOTICE OF $650,000 BOND SALE
MARLBOROUGH FIRE DISTRICT, IN THE TOWN OF MARLBOROUGH, ULSTER COUNTY, NEW YORK NOTICE OF $650,000 BOND SALE SEALED PROPOSALS will be received by the Fire District Treasurer, Marlborough Fire District,
More informationDEBT MANAGEMENT EXAMINATION (1/19)
1. Duration: a) is a measure of volatility of bond returns. b) is influenced by the coupon rate and yield to maturity. c) provides an approximation of the percentage price change in a bond due to a change
More informationNOTICE OF BOND SALE $10,000,000* CITY OF HANNIBAL, MISSOURI WATERWORKS REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2019
NOTICE OF BOND SALE $10,000,000* CITY OF HANNIBAL, MISSOURI WATERWORKS REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2019 Bids to be Accepted Bids for the purchase of $10,000,000* principal amount of Waterworks Revenue Bonds,
More informationPolicy No.: ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY Original Date: May 17, Page: 1 of 10 Owner: Financial and Administrative Services
Policy No.: 7.2.21 ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY Original Date: May 17, 2017 DEBT MANAGEMENT Revision Date: New Policy Page: 1 of 10 Owner: Financial and Administrative Services 1. PURPOSE; OBJECTIVES The Port
More informationFIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 43 (MAPLE VALLEY FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY) KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. R
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 43 (MAPLE VALLEY FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY) KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. R-2012-015 A RESOLUTION of the Board of Fire Commissioners of Fire Protection District No. 43
More informationCOLORADO HOUSING AND FINANCE AUTHORITY ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (With Independent Auditors Report Thereon) December 31, 2015 and 2014
COLORADO HOUSING AND FINANCE AUTHORITY ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (With Independent Auditors Report Thereon) December 31, 2015 and 2014 Prepared by: Accounting Division COLORADO HOUSING AND FINANCE AUTHORITY
More informationDATE ISSUED: 9/16/ of 9 LDU CCA(LOCAL)-X
Purpose Scope Debt Management Objectives Policy Review Delegation of Responsibility Ethics Disclosures The purpose of this policy is to establish guidelines governing the issuance, management, and reporting
More informationRaymond James & Associates, Inc
NEW ISSUE FINAL OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED MARCH 20, 2018 S&P Global Ratings:AA (See Rating ) In the opinion of Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., Bond Counsel, under existing law, and
More informationLOS ANGELES COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT. June 30, 2011
June 30, 2011 Los Angeles County, California: East Los Angeles College Los Angeles City College Los Angeles Harbor College Los Angeles Mission College Pierce College Los Angeles Southwest College Los Angeles
More information[MASTER TRUST LOAN AGREEMENT - AUTHORITY FORM] LOAN AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN NEW JERSEY ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE TRUST AND [NAME OF BORROWER]
Resolution No 14-64, Exhibit A2 [MASTER TRUST LOAN AGREEMENT - AUTHORITY FORM] LOAN AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN NEW JERSEY ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE TRUST AND [NAME OF BORROWER] DATED AS OF MAY 1, 2015
More information