Telephone Consumer Protection Act: New Challenges Stemming from the July 2015 FCC Declaratory Ruling and Order
|
|
- Sabrina Brown
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Telephone Consumer Protection Act: New Challenges Stemming from the July 2015 FCC Declaratory Ruling and Order Authors Daniel JT McKenna Ballard Spahr, LLP Philadelphia, PA Nicole M. Strickler Messer, Stilp & Strickler, LTD Chicago, IL Zachary D. Miller Burr & Forman, LLP Nashville, TN Mauricio Videla CFPB New York, NY The 2015 Declaratory Ruling and Order On July 10, 2015, the Federal Communications Commission ( FCC ) approved a Declaratory Ruling and Order ( Order ) addressing nineteen petitions that requested the FCC clarify its prior interpretations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). 1 The Order creates new challenges for businesses attempting to comply with the TCPA and avoid liability from consumers asserting a private right of action through class action lawsuits. While the Order provides targeted, content-specific relief for certain industries, the FCC s interpretations create significant new TCPA risks for any business that contacts consumers via telephone. Defining Called Party. As a general rule, the TCPA prohibits the use of an automatic telephone dialing system ( ATDS ) to call a cellular phone without the prior express consent of the called party. 47 U.S.C. 227(b)(1)(A)(iii). The statute, however, does not define the term called party. The FCC attempted to clarify the definition to mean the subscriber, i.e., the consumer assigned the telephone number dialed and billed for the call, or the non-subscriber customary user of a telephone number included in a family or business calling plan. Order, p. 41. This clarified definition provides some relief for businesses by expanding the avenues to obtain prior express consent to include consent provided by the customary user of the telephone line. In other words, a customary user may now bind a subscriber by providing prior express consent, and vice versa. The expanded definition also increases the category of individuals who may assert a TCPA claim and, as discussed further below, it can be difficult or in some cases, impossible to verify the identity of the customary user of a cellular telephone. Defining Autodialers. Prior to the Order, some federal district courts had taken a narrower view than the FCC of the term ATDS. The statutory language of the TCPA states that an ATDS is equipment which has the capacity (A) to store or produce telephone numbers to be called, using a random or sequential number generator; and (B) to dial such numbers. 47 U.S.C. 227(a)(1). In Hunt v. 21st Mortg. Corp., No. 2:12 CV 2697 WMA, 2013 WL (N.D. Ala. Sept. 17, 2013), the court held that a system must have the present capacity to store or produce and call numbers from a number generator at the time the calls are being made in order to meet the TCPA definition of an automatic telephone dialing system. The FCC broadly defined autodialer to include a wide array of calling equipment and software by interpreting capacity to include equipment that lacks the present ability to dial randomly or sequentially, and that equipment that could be easily modified through software changes has the capacity to dial randomly or sequentially. Order, p. 14. While the FCC provides general parameters for present ability, it leaves open 1 Available at 1
2 almost limitless categories of equipment that could be included within its interpretation. In particular, the FCC proposed that there must be more than a theoretical potential that the equipment could be modified to satisfy the autodialer definition, and that while in theory a rotary-dial phone could be modified to be an autodialer, that possibility is too attenuated for the FCC to find that such a phone has the requisite capacity. Order, p. 15. Companies must now consider how easily their dialing equipment could be modified so that it could dial randomly or sequentially. Departing from its previous interpretation that ATDS required the equipment to dial numbers without human intervention, the FCC has setup new hurdles for potential litigants by requiring a case-by-case analysis regarding how much human intervention is required for a specific piece of equipment to function as an autodialer. Order p. 15. Moreover, the Order clarifies that companies may not divide the ownership of dialing equipment to circumvent liability under the TCPA. For example, if companies contractually divide the storage of consumer information and the actual calling function between separate entities, a voluntary combination of the two may be considered an ATDS if the net result enables the combined equipment to have the capacity to store or produce telephone numbers and to call those numbers randomly or sequentially. Companies using such a model should reassess their TCPA compliance risks. Revoking Consent. The TCPA itself is silent on whether or how consumers may revoke their prior express consent to receive autodialed and prerecorded calls. The Order grants consumers more protections by permitting them to revoke their prior express consent through any reasonable means and in any manner that clearly express[es] a desire not to receive further messages. Additionally, callers may not infringe on that ability by designating an exclusive means to revoke. Order, pp The Order plainly states that consent to receive autodialed and prerecorded calls may be revoked either orally or in writing, for example at an in-store bill payment location, among other possibilities. Id. at 36. In determining the reasonableness of the consumers revocation, the Order states that whether a consumer s revocation is reasonable is a factual question and can be determined by asking: 1. Whether the consumer had a reasonable expectation that he or she could effectively communicate his or her revocation in that circumstance; and 2. Whether the caller could have implemented mechanisms to effectuate a requested revocation without incurring undue burdens. Id. Based on this, companies will need to assess the adequacy of their procedures to ensure they have controls in place to handle the multiple ways through which consumers may revoke their consent for autodialed and prerecorded calls. At a minimum, companies must honor consumers written, oral, and in-person revocation requests. Calls to Reassigned Phone Numbers. Pursuant to the Order, the actual receiving party s consent is required to make an autodialed call. The Order states that callers must have the prior express consent of the current subscriber or the telephone s customary user. If a telephone number is reassigned to a new consumer, a company cannot rely on the prior owner s consent to avoid TCPA liability. Order, p. 39. However, as noted, determining the identity of the subscriber or customary user of a cellphone is not always easy. Cellphone companies routinely reassign telephone numbers after customers close their accounts or switch to another carrier. Further, unless a customer informs a company, there is no reliable way for businesses to promptly determine that a particular customer s cellphone number has been reassigned. Therefore, a company may unknowingly expose itself to liability under the TCPA. The FCC points out that [n]othing in the TCPA or [its] rules prevents parties from creating, through a contract or other private agreement, an obligation for the person giving consent to notify the caller when the number has been 2
3 relinquished. Order, pp As the dissenting Commissioners note, however, prudent businesses would be hesitant to enforce such as clause given the risk to a company s reputation in filing suit against a consumer for a seemingly innocuous failure to update contact information. Even if a company did file suit, it likely would not recover sufficient damages from the consumer to cover its losses given the substantial litigation costs involved in a TCPA action. The Order permits a company to make a single call to the reassigned number to obtain actual or constructive knowledge of the reassignment. Id. at 5, 40. This single call exemption, or safe harbor, extends to an entire corporate family, including all affiliates and subsidiaries. The company, however, may not make a single call if it has actual knowledge of the reassignment. This single call exemption is limited to one call whether the new consumer answers or not. The Order suggests companies adopt best practices to identify reassigned phone numbers. For example, it suggests using a private database that tracks reassigned wireless numbers, even though the database only claims to be accurate 80% of the time. Id. at 45, fn 293, Companies may look for signs of a telephone number s reassignment, such as tones indicating a number is no longer in service or hearing a new name in a voic greeting. Id. at 48. Companies will need to quickly develop procedures to avoid strict liability for contacting reassigned numbers. Porting Telephone Numbers. Porting a telephone number from a residential or business wireline telephone to a mobile telephone number does not revoke a consumer s prior express consent for autodialed calls to that number. Order, p. 32. If the consent obtained for the wireline number satisfies the prior express consent requirements for wireless telephones (i.e., prior express written consent for telemarketing calls or simply prior express consent for collection calls), then the caller may continue to rely on that consent to make autodialed or prerecorded calls to the ported number. Making or Initiating Autodialed Calls (mobile app text messages). Several companies requested the FCC clarify that text messages sent by certain mobile app group text messaging functions were not calls initiated by the company that provided the app, but rather were calls initiated by the user. Order, A company that makes or initiates an autodialed or prerecorded call must comply with the TCPA. Noting that the TCPA does not define how a party makes or initiates an autodialed call, the FCC determined that this is a factual question. The Order creates a two-question test for determining who makes or initiates an autodialed call: 1. Who took the steps necessary to physically place the call; and 2. Whether another person or entity was so involved in placing the call as to be deemed to have initiated it, considering the goals and purposes of the TCPA. Id. at 20. Further, with regards to mobile app text messaging features, the Order clarifies that the fact that a consumer s wireless number is in the contact list on another person s wireless phone, by itself, does not demonstrate consent to autodialed or prerecorded calls or text messages. This presumed consent is insufficient for TCPA purposes. Id. at Prior Express Written Consent for Marketing Calls. The Order clarifies that to obtain a consumer s prior express written consent for marketing calls, telemarketers must disclose to consumers that they will receive telemarketing calls using an autodialer and that consent is not a condition of purchase. Companies may not rely on oral or unwritten prior express consent obtained before the Commission implemented the prior express written consent rule in Order, pp On Demand Text Message Offers. A company may immediately respond to a consumer-initiated request for a text message with a single text message response. Order, pp On demand text message offers 3
4 may suggest a consumer send a text message to a retailer for a special discount or other offer. The Order confirms that a company may respond to the consumer with an immediate one-time text message that fulfills the consumer s request. This one time reply may only contain the information requested by the consumer, and may not contain any marketing messages. Internet-to-Phone Text Messaging. The Order finds that internet-to-phone text messages sent through an or a web portal system are sent using an autodialer and are subject to the TCPA. The Order also confirms that text messages are calls under the TCPA. Order, p. 57. Free to End User Calls by Financial Institutions. The Order grants an exemption requested by the American Bankers Association for certain free to end user autodialed calls by financial institutions. Order, pp The Order exempts four types of calls: Calls intended to prevent fraudulent transactions or identity theft; Data security breach notifications; Measures consumers may take to prevent identity theft following a data breach; and Money transfer notifications. Id. at In addition to being free to the recipient, the Order places seven additional requirements for these exempt calls. Id. at Free to End User Calls by Healthcare Providers. The Order confirms that a consumer consents to autodialed healthcare-related calls subject to HIPAA from a healthcare provider and business associates acting on its behalf when the consumer provides their telephone number to the HIPAA-covered provider. The Order also finds that when a consumer is unable to provide prior express consent because of a medical incapacity, prior express consent for healthcare calls may be obtained from a third party. The Order also exempts, subject to certain requirements, autodialed calls made for a healthcare treatment purpose. These include: Appointment and exam confirmations and reminders; Hospital pre-registration instructions; Pre- and post-operative care instructions; Prescription notifications; and Home healthcare instructions. Like the exempt calls for financial institutions, these healthcare-related exempt calls must be free to the end user and are subject to seven additional requirements. Order, pp Call Blocking Technology. Confirming that telephone carriers may offer consumers the option to block the receipt of autodialed and prerecorded calls to their residential and wireless telephones, the FCC advised that carriers offering blocking services must make clear to consumers that blocking technology may block calls the consumer actually wishes to receive. Order, pp Challenging the Order in Court. After the Order s issuance, three separate organizations have filed suit against the FCC. The three lawsuits are styled as follows: Professional Association for Customer Engagement, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Case No (7th Cir.); ACA International v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, No (D.C. Cir.); and Sirius XM Radio Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, No (D.C. Cir.). 4
5 Each of the lawsuits requests judicial review of the Order, arguing that it is arbitrary and capricious, an abuse of discretion, in excess of the FCC s statutory authority, and otherwise contrary to the Constitution and other laws. Specifically, the ACA s petition seeks to set aside the FCC s treatment of: 1. capacity within the definition of ATDS; 2. predictive dialers and treat them in a way that does not expand the statutory definition of ATDS; and, 3. prior express consent, including the FCC s treatment of reassigned numbers, and compel the FCC to: a. establish a viable safe harbor for autodialed wrong number non-telemarketing calls to reassigned wireless numbers, or b. define called party as a call s intended recipient. The three lawsuits have been consolidated since their initial filing. The U.S. Panel on Multidistrict Litigation randomly selected the U.S. Court of Appeals for D.C. Circuit to hear the matters. On August 10, 2015, several additional parties sought leave to intervene in the lawsuit or, in the alternative, leave to participate as amici curiae. These purported interveners Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC, Diversified Consultants, Inc., and Mercantile Adjustment Bureau, LLC describe themselves as debt collection agencies, state that they have each made a significant investment in call center technologies and contend that the actions of the [FCC] in these proceedings significantly affect the ways in which calls can lawfully be made, and make anyone making outbound telephone calls subject to a claim that calls violated the [TCPA], and expose the caller to spurious class action claims that seek to impose ruinous damages invariably prompting extortionate settlements. See Corrected Mot. to Intervene at 3, In re Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, CG Docket No (FCC No ). Defendants looking to challenge the Order in civil litigation face an uphill battle. Federal courts have afforded significant deference to the FCC s prior rulings and orders on the TCPA. Most recently, the Eleventh Circuit unanimously reversed the controversial lower court ruling in Mais v. Gulf Coast Collection Bureau, 768 F.3d 1110 (11th Cir. 2014). In Mais, the plaintiff s cellphone number was provided to a Florida emergency room in connection with the plaintiff s receipt of medical services. The plaintiff s medical debt went unpaid and the account was forwarded to collections. Plaintiff filed suit under the TCPA against the hospital-based radiology provider and the third-party debt collector for making autodialed calls to his cellphone. The debt collector, Gulf Coast, contended that the calls fell within the statutory exception for prior express consent, as interpreted in a 2008 FCC Declaratory Ruling ( Ruling ). The Ruling stated that the provision of a cellphone number to a creditor, e.g., as part of a credit application, reasonably evidences prior express consent by the cellphone subscriber to be contacted at that number regarding the debt. Ruling, p. 6. The FCC further concluded in its Ruling that calls placed by a third party collector on behalf of that creditor are treated as if the creditor itself placed the call. Id. at 7. The district court granted partial summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, finding that the FCC s interpretation of prior express consent was inconsistent with the language of the TCPA, and alternatively, that the 2008 FCC Ruling did not apply to medical debts and was therefore inapplicable to the case at hand. In reversing the Ruling, the Eleventh Circuit found that the district court lacked the power to consider in any way the validity of the 2008 FCC Ruling and also erred in concluding that the FCC s interpretation did not control the disposition of the case. 768 F.3d 1110, 1113 (11th Cir. 2014). Importantly, the Hobbs Act provides that courts of appeals have exclusive jurisdiction to determine the validity of all FCC final orders. By refusing to enforce the FCC s interpretation, the Eleventh Circuit ruled that the district court exceeded its power. The Eleventh Circuit further concluded that the FCC did not distinguish or exclude medical creditors from the 2008 Ruling, but rather the general language contained in the 2008 Ruling was meant to reach a wide range of creditors and collectors, including those pursuing medical debts. Accordingly, the Eleventh Circuit reversed the partial grant of summary judgment to the plaintiff and remanded the case to the district court with instructions to enter summary judgment in favor of Gulf Coast. 5
6 The majority of federal courts have afforded significant deference to the Commission in interpreting the TCPA. Thus, businesses hoping for a judicial review of the Order should closely follow the developments in the D.C. Circuit and should not assume that challenges to the Order will be successful. Conclusion Companies should work with counsel to review the architecture of their dialing hardware and software systems and to take stock of their policies and procedures for contacting consumers by telephone. In light of the Order, companies may need to revise their systems architecture and develop new policies and procedures to avoid both individual and class-wide exposure for violating the TCPA. The TCPA provides for a private right of action, statutory damages of $500 per violation, and treble damages for willful violations. As pointed out by the dissenting Commissioners, there were almost 2,000 TCPA class action cases filed in About the Authors Daniel JT McKenna Daniel JT McKenna is a partner in the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania office of Ballard Spahr, LLP. Mr. McKenna devotes his practice to privacy and data security, consumer financial services, and mortgage banking litigation. As Co-Practice Leader of the Firm s Privacy and Data Security Group, Mr. McKenna s privacy practice focuses on new product and process design, privacy impact assessments and audits, privacy management and policy, incident planning, incident response and notification, third-party and vendor management, privacy counseling, regulatory comments, and litigation. His clients include banks, loan service providers, health care providers, manufacturers, colleges and universities, and member organizations. Mr. McKenna s consumer financial services practice focuses on individual and class litigation and arbitration in mortgage, credit card, debt-collection, auto loan, and servicing matters. His clients include banks and nonbank lenders, mortgage lenders and servicers, third-party service providers, auto lenders, and repossession companies. He regularly represents clients in a variety of individual and class action matters, including claims brought under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), Truth in Lending Act (TILA), Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA), Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), Electronic Funds Transfer Act (EFTA), Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act (HOEPA), Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA), Alternative Mortgage Transaction Parity Act (AMTPA), Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), and state Unfair, Deceptive, or Abusive Acts or Practices (UDAAP) statutes. Mr. McKenna has trial experience in both federal and state courts and significant experience with JAMS and AAA. Zachary D. Miller Zachary D. Miller is an associate in the Nashville, Tennessee office of Burr & Forman, LLP. Mr. Miller is a member of the firm s financial services litigation practice group, where he defends financial institutions such as banks, mortgage lenders, credit card companies, auto finance companies and debt buyers/collectors in consumer lawsuits filed under various state and federal laws, including the Truth-in-Lending Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. He is currently serving as defense counsel on several nationwide TCPA class actions and has defended TCPA claims in jurisdictions across the country. While specializing in consumer finance litigation, Zach also handles numerous general commercial litigation matters. Zach is a member of the Tennessee, Alabama and Florida State Bar. Zach serves as a Young Lawyer Liaison for the Debt Collection and the Bankruptcy Subcommittee of the American Bar Association s 6
7 Consumer Financial Services Committee and he is also a graduate of the TIPS/ABOTA National Trial Academy. Nicole M. Strickler Nicole M. Strickler is a shareholder in the Chicago law firm Messer, Stilp, and Strickler, LTD. Ms. Strickler concentrates her practice in the defense of consumer financial litigation throughout the country. This includes representing clients in both individual and class actions involving state and federal consumer laws, including the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ("FDCPA"), Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ), and Telephone Consumer Protection Act ( TCPA ), to name just a few. In addition to her substantial experience in trial practice, she also has considerable experience representing clients before state agencies, such as the Illinois Department of Professional Regulation, federal agencies, such as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ( CFPB ), as well as in attorney general inquiries and investigations. She also routinely represents clients in both mediation and arbitrations, such as in proceedings held before JAMS. Her clients include small and publically held corporations, lending institutions, collection agencies, creditors, servicers, asset purchasers, credit reporting agencies, law firms and individuals. Ms. Strickler is considered authoritative the consumer financial services compliance field and routinely speaks before industry trade organizations on issues affecting the consumer financial services industry. She also serves as a Young Lawyer Liaison for the Compliance Management Subcommittee of the American Bar Association s Consumer Financial Services Committee. Mauricio Videla Mauricio Videla is a Compliance Examiner with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Mr. Videla previously held positions in legal, regulatory & compliance, retail banking, commercial insurance operations, and corporate governance at large private and public institutions, including TD Bank, N.A., Citibank, N.A., Chubb Group of Insurance Companies, and the City of New York. Mr. Videla holds leadership positions in the American Bar Association Business Law Section as Vice Chair of the Young Lawyers Committee, Young Lawyer Liaison to the Consumer Financial Services Committee, and Chair of the subcommittee for Young Lawyer & Law Student Involvement. Mr. Videla received his B.A. in Psychology and Business Administration from St. John s University, M.P.A. from CUNY Baruch College, and J.D. from Indiana University. This article is the result of the authors independent research and does not necessarily represent the views of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau or the United States. 7
Introduction to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Introduction to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act Utah Bankers Association Compliance Conference October 24, 2017 Copyright 2017 by Ballard Spahr LLP Overview of Presentation Overview of TCPA restrictions
More informationSpeak Softly and Carry a Big Lawyer Emerging Legal Risks to Credit Unions
Speak Softly and Carry a Big Lawyer Emerging Legal Risks to Credit Unions Stuart M. Richter Andrew Demko (May 1, 2018) What You will Hear About Today Class Action and Other Litigation Risk Areas Arbitration
More informationCOMPLIANCE AND MAXIMIZING YOUR RETURNS
COMPLIANCE AND MAXIMIZING YOUR RETURNS PRESENTED BY: JOHN KASZUBA & BRIAN BOYINGTON OF LEGAL DISCLAIMER This information is provided for informational purposes only by Professional Finance Company, Inc
More informationFair Debt Collection: What Every Bankruptcy Attorney Should Know
Fair Debt Collection: What Every Bankruptcy Attorney Should Know William M. Clanton Law Office of Bill Clanton, P.C. 926 Chulie Dr. San Antonio, Texas 78216 210 226 0800 210 338 8660 fax bill@clantonlawoffice.com
More informationBefore the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Advanced Methods to Target and Eliminate ) CG Docket No. 17-59 Unlawful Robocalls ) Comments of the Credit Union
More informationCONSUMER FINANCIAL SERVICES: SUPERVISION, ENFORCEMENT & LITIGATION
CONSUMER FINANCIAL SERVICES: SUPERVISION, ENFORCEMENT & LITIGATION Davis Wright Tremaine LLP (DWT) is a firm of approximately 550 lawyers in nine offices in the U.S. and China. DWT s consumer financial
More informationJune 6, Introduction
June 6, 2016 Commission s Secretary Office of the Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., SW Room TW-A325 Washington, DC 20554 Submitted via Regulations.gov Subject: Comments of the Consumer
More informationCollections and the Law Current Issues and Trends. The times are a changin
Collections and the Law Current Issues and Trends The times are a changin Chad V. Echols Outside General Counsel Williams & Fudge, Inc. Owner of: The Echols Firm, LLC chad.echols@theecholsfirm.com COHEAO
More informationReport and Order, Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, CG Docket No (released Aug. 11, 2016).
Jonathan Thessin Senior Counsel Center for Regulatory Compliance Phone: 202-663-5016 E-mail: Jthessin@aba.com June 28, 2018 Via ECFS Ms. Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445
More informationDELL PREFERRED ACCOUNT CREDIT AGREEMENT
DELL PREFERRED ACCOUNT CREDIT AGREEMENT IMPORTANT MESSAGE FOR CUSTOMERS Following is the DELL PREFERRED ACCOUNT CREDIT AGREEMENT that governs the Dell Preferred Account you requested for purposes of financing
More informationThe Compliance Challenges of Credit Union Collections. Collections and Compliance?
The Compliance Challenges of Credit Union Collections Presented by Maria Peyton NSWC Federal Credit Union Collections and Compliance? Yes! It is about more than just collecting a debt Collectors must be
More informationORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED No (and consolidated cases) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #15-1211 Document #1586460 Filed: 12/02/2015 Page 1 of 41 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED No. 15-1211 (and consolidated cases) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
More informationHow to Ace Your CFPB Exam
How to Ace Your CFPB Exam May 25, 2016 Moderator Alan S. Kaplinsky Practice Leader Consumer Financial Services 215.864.8544 kaplinsky@ballardspahr.com Panelists Richard J. Andreano, Jr. Practice Leader
More informationMarch 10, The Credit Union National Association (CUNA) represents America s credit unions and their more than 100 million members.
March 10, 2017 Ms. Marlene H. Dortch Office of the Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12 th Street, SW Room TW-A325 Washington, DC 20554 Via electronic submission Re: Petition for Rulemaking
More informationMEMORY BANK ACCOUNT RULES (continued)
MEMORY BANK ACCOUNT RULES These Account Rules apply to any deposit account provided by Memory Bank, a division of Republic Bank & Trust Company, (hereafter referred to as Bank, we, us, or our ). Throughout
More informationLoan Growth and Compliance Pitfalls
Loan Growth and Compliance Pitfalls presented by LOANLINER Compliance Information provided in this presentation, including all materials, should not be construed as legal services, legal advice, or in
More informationKevin Patterson Partner
100 Quentin Roosevelt Boulevard Garden City, NY 11530-4850 ph: 516.296.9196 fx: 516.357.3792 kpatterson@cullenanddykman.com AREAS OF PRACTICE Banking Compliance Bank Operations Bank Regulatory and Compliance
More informationdentons.com Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)
Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) Overview Many businesses today still attract customers the oldfashioned way: by calling them. Customer solicitation/ retention
More informationCase 2:17-cv CB Document 28 Filed 02/28/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:17-cv-01502-CB Document 28 Filed 02/28/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION ) BUREAU, ) ) Petitioner, ) Civil
More informationFair Lending TILA and RESPA Integrated Disclosures ( TRID ) and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ( CFPB )
Fair Lending TILA and RESPA Integrated Disclosures ( TRID ) and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ( CFPB ) Presented by Anthony J. Sylvester, Esq. Craig L. Steinfeld, Esq. Sherman Wells Sylvester &
More informationBenjamin E. Gurstelle
Shareholder 2200 IDS Center 80 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 p: 612.977.8722 f: 612.977.8650 bgurstelle@briggs.com Ben Gurstelle is a member of the Business Litigation and Financial Institutions
More informationCENTURYLINK ELECTRONIC AND ONLINE PAYMENT TERMS AND CONDITIONS
CENTURYLINK ELECTRONIC AND ONLINE PAYMENT TERMS AND CONDITIONS Effective June 1, 2014 The following terms and conditions apply to electronic and online delivery and presentation of your invoices by CenturyLink
More informationRe: Request for Information Regarding Bureau Enforcement Processes (Docket No. CFPB )
May 14, 2018 By Electronic Submission Ms. Monica Jackson Office of the Executive Secretary Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 1700 G Street NW Washington, DC 20552 www.regulations.gov Jan Stieger, CMP,
More informationFINAL RULE ANALYSIS FCC FINAL RULE ON TCPA & FEDERAL DEBT COLLECTION
FINAL RULE ANALYSIS FCC FINAL RULE ON TCPA & FEDERAL DEBT COLLECTION OVERVIEW In August 2016, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) issued its final rule on exempting automated federal debt collection
More informationCFPB Releases FDCPA Rule Outline; Creditor Collection Rule to Come
Consumer Financial Services Update CFPB Releases FDCPA Rule Outline; Creditor Collection Rule to Come July 29, 2016 On July 28, 2016, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) released an outline
More informationMortgage Banking. Solutions in Compliance, Transactions, and Defense. Attorney Advertising
Mortgage Banking Solutions in Compliance, Transactions, and Defense Attorney Advertising The mortgage banking industry is changing rapidly. We offer broad regulatory experience, formidable skill in litigation,
More informationQ UPDATE EXECUTIVE RISK SOLUTIONS CASES OF INTEREST D&O FILINGS, SETTLEMENTS AND OTHER DEVELOPMENTS
EXECUTIVE RISK SOLUTIONS Q1 2018 UPDATE CASES OF INTEREST U.S. SUPREME COURT FINDS STATE COURTS RETAIN JURISDICTION OVER 1933 ACT CLAIMS STATUTORY DAMAGES FOR VIOLATION OF TCPA FOUND TO BE PENALTIES AND
More informationCase 3:13-cv CRS-DW Document 167 Filed 03/22/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 4892
Case 3:13-cv-01047-CRS-DW Document 167 Filed 03/22/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 4892 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU PLAINTIFF v.
More informationFAIR DEBT COLLECTIONS PRACTICES ACT IN THE FORECLOSURE PROCESS. by Steven C. Lindberg Freedman Anselmo Lindberg & Rappe LLC August, 2002
FAIR DEBT COLLECTIONS PRACTICES ACT IN THE FORECLOSURE PROCESS by Steven C. Lindberg Freedman Anselmo Lindberg & Rappe LLC August, 2002 The Fair Debt Collections Practices Act, 15 U.S.C.A. 1692A-1692O
More informationTelephony and Voic
To the Point: Telephony and Voicemail Copyright 2013 insidearm.com. All rights reserved. NOTICE: This transcript is offered for sale by insidearm.com. Purchase of this transcript entitles the buyer to
More informationINSURANCE COVERAGE COUNSEL
INSURANCE COVERAGE COUNSEL 2601 AIRPORT DR., SUITE 360 TORRANCE, CA 90505 tel: 310.784.2443 fax: 310.784.2444 www.bolender-firm.com 1. What does it mean to say someone is Cumis counsel or independent counsel?
More information27.99% This APR will vary with the market based on the Prime Rate.
PHILLIPS 66 [32050D] (06/12)_BRC_T&C-I_APDF (REV 7/17) E-APPLY SYNCHRONY BANK RATES AND FEES TABLE PHILLIPS 66 CONOCO 76 COMMERCIAL CREDIT CARD ACCOUNT AGREEMENT Interest Rates and Interest Charges Annual
More informationThe staff of the FCC that attended these meetings included:
June 8, 2015 Marlene Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington DC 20554 Re: Notice of Ex Parte Presentation, CG Docket No. 02-278 Dear Ms. Dortch: On June 4, 2015,
More informationCASE 0:16-cv JNE-TNL Document 18 Filed 07/06/16 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:16-cv-00293-JNE-TNL Document 18 Filed 07/06/16 Page 1 of 5 Steven Demarais, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA v. Case No. 16-cv-293 (JNE/TNL) ORDER Gurstel Chargo, P.A.,
More informationCase 2:16-cv MHH Document 74 Filed 08/23/18 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:16-cv-00694-MHH Document 74 Filed 08/23/18 Page 1 of 22 FILED 2018 Aug-23 AM 09:22 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN
More informationMercantil Bank, N.A. Cardholder Agreement
Mercantil Bank, N.A. Cardholder Agreement This Agreement governs your credit card account ( Account ) with us. It consists of this document, a Pricing Information document, and other documents that we
More informationCase: 1:10-cv Document #: 56 Filed: 12/06/10 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:261
Case: 1:10-cv-00573 Document #: 56 Filed: 12/06/10 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:261 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION VICTOR GULLEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) )
More informationSYNCHRONY BANK RATES AND FEES TABLE PAYPAL CASHBACK MASTERCARD ACCOUNT AGREEMENT PRICING INFORMATION
FR833282333_PAYPAL CASHBACK MASTERCARD T&C DC PDF 32048AF, 32048AG, 32048AH 09/17 Interest Rates and Interest Charges Annual Percentage Rate (APR) for Purchases APR for Cash Advances Paying Interest Minimum
More informationExamination Procedures
After completing the risk assessment and examination scoping, examiners should use these procedures, in conjunction with the compliance management system Exam Date: Exam ID No. Prepared By: Reviewer: Docket
More informationCase 2:18-cv JAW Document 1 Filed 05/21/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE
Case 2:18-cv-00205-JAW Document 1 Filed 05/21/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE SHARON PAYEUR, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 5:16-cv JSM-PRL
Case: 16-17126 Date Filed: 09/22/2017 Page: 1 of 12 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 16-17126 D.C. Docket No. 5:16-cv-00387-JSM-PRL STACEY HART, versus CREDIT
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit No. 15-2984 Domick Nelson lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
More informationLending to Military Members: The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act and Military Lending Act Final Rule
Lending to Military Members: The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act and Military Lending Act Final Rule Louisiana Bankers Association 2015 Bank Counsel Conference December 11, 2015 Presented by: Laura Brown,
More informationDistrict Court Determines IRS Exceeded Regulatory Limit on FBAR Penalties
IRS Insights A closer look. In this issue: District Court Determines IRS Exceeded Regulatory Limit on FBAR Penalties... 1 Internal Revenue Service Issues Guidelines for IRS Chief Counsel on Supervisory
More informationTCPA & The Need for Reform
TCPA & The Need for Reform Bob Perrin, COHEAO Jason Goldman, US Chamber of Commerce Howard Waltzman, Mayer Brown 2013 COHEAO Annual Conference Arlington, VA January 28, 2013 1 Snapshot of TCPA History
More information8:18-cv DCC Date Filed 01/03/18 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12
8:18-cv-00014-DCC Date Filed 01/03/18 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON/GREENVILLE DIVISION JONATHAN ALSTON and DARIUS REID, individually
More informationThe DoD s 11th Hour Interpretive Rule For New MLA Rules
The DoD s 11th Hour Interpretive Rule For New MLA Rules September 20, 2016 Moderator Alan S. Kaplinsky Practice Leader Consumer Financial Services 215.864.8544 kaplinsky@ballardspahr.com Panelists John
More informationStandard Mortgage Clause Preserves Coverage for Mortgagee Notwithstanding Carrier s Denial of Named Insured s Claim
Property Insurance Law Catherine A. Cooke Robbins, Salomon & Patt, Ltd., Chicago Standard Mortgage Clause Preserves Coverage for Mortgagee Notwithstanding Carrier s Denial of Named Insured s Claim The
More informationConsumer Lending Regulatory Focus for 2017/2018
Consumer Lending Regulatory Focus for 2017/2018 Courtney H. Gilmer Shareholder Phone: 615.726.5747 Email: cgilmer@bakerdonelson.com Overview of Topics HMDA Fair Lending Debt Collection/FDCPA TCPA Arbitration
More informationPushing the Envelope: Are There Any Limits to the CFPB s Jurisdiction?
Pushing the Envelope: Are There Any Limits to the CFPB s Jurisdiction? August 18, 2015 Moderator Alan S. Kaplinsky Practice Leader Consumer Financial Services 215.864.8544 kaplinsky@ballardspahr.com Panelists
More informationLeveling the Playing Field CFPB Regulations and Guidance Targeted for Review by Treasury Under President Trump s February 3 Executive Order
Leveling the Playing Field CFPB Regulations and Guidance Targeted for Review by Treasury Under President Trump s February 3 Executive Order March 6, 2017 Moderator Richard J. Andreano, Jr. Practice Leader
More informationDevelopments in CFPB Servicing Rules and Enforcement Trends
Developments in CFPB Servicing Rules and Enforcement Trends Panel: Michelle Garcia Gilbert: Gilbert Garcia Group, P.A. Rose Marie Brook, Fabrizio & Brook, P.C. Stephen Hladik, Hladik, Onorato & Federman,
More informationCase 1:18-cv AMD-RLM Document 1 Filed 07/02/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1
Case 1:18-cv-03806-AMD-RLM Document 1 Filed 07/02/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------- ZISSY HOLCZLER
More informationDocket No. CFPB Mortgage Servicing Rules Under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (Regulation X)
Monica Jackson Office of the Executive Secretary Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 1700 G Street NW Washington, DC 20552 By electronic delivery to: www.regulations.gov Re: Docket No. CFPB-2017-0031
More informationMonthly Net Income From All Sources
APPLICATION AND CREDIT CARD ACCOUNT AGREEMENT A credit service of GE Capital Retail Bank ** MARRIED WI Residents only: If you are applying for an individual account and your spouse also is a WI resident,
More informationThrough the Crystal Ball: Predicting Important CFPB Developments in 2015
Through the Crystal Ball: Predicting Important CFPB Developments in 2015 April 2, 2015 Moderator Alan S. Kaplinsky Practice Leader Consumer Financial Services 215.864.8544 kaplinsky@ballardspahr.com Panelists
More informationVaries by State from 17% to 23%.
The table immediately below is provided for illustrative purposes only and the consumer will receive a table with their specific terms prior to the first transactions on the account. Interest Rate and
More informationPreparing for a CFPB Examination or Investigation
Preparing for a CFPB Examination or Investigation Association of Credit Counseling Professionals Fall 2013 Conference November 14, 2013, 9:15 am 10:30 am ET Tampa, Florida Jonathan L. Pompan, Esq. Venable
More informationFMEA TCPA Compliance FDCPA Update on Adding Fee to Collections Collections Best Practices
FMEA TCPA Compliance FDCPA Update on Adding Fee to Collections Collections Best Practices 1 About ONLINE Industry leader for more almost 60 years. Headquartered in North Carolina. Originally a small merchant
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cv JEC. Plaintiff - Appellant,
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 10-14619 D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cv-02598-JEC FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MARCH 30, 2012 JOHN LEY CLERK
More informationConsumer Protection: The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. By Hillary R. Ross, Esq. The FDCPA Overview
Consumer Protection: The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act By Hillary R. Ross, Esq. The FDCPA Overview 15 U.S.C. 1692 et seq. Prohibits false, deceptive, misleading, harassing, abusive and offensive conduct
More informationRicciardi v. Ameriquest Mtg Co
2006 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-17-2006 Ricciardi v. Ameriquest Mtg Co Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 05-1409 Follow
More informationSummary of Debt Collection Proposals Under Consideration 1
I. Executive Summary Summary of Debt Collection Proposals Under Consideration 1 On July 28, 2016, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ( CFPB or Bureau ) released its 117 page outline for debt collection
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 0:13-cv BB.
Case: 15-10038 Date Filed: 12/03/2015 Page: 1 of 13 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 15-10038 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 0:13-cv-62338-BB KEVIN
More informationKim Potoczny v. Aurora Loan Services
2015 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-21-2015 Kim Potoczny v. Aurora Loan Services Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2015
More informationFees and Expiration. Replacement Card at Expiration : There is no additional cost to obtain a replacement Card due to expiration.
Visa or Mastercard Prepaid Gift Card Cardholder Agreement CUSTOMER SERVICE CONTACT INFORMATION: Address: 5501 S. Broadband Ln, Sioux Falls, SD 57108 Website: MyPrepaidBalance.com and My Prepaid App Phone
More informationCase 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 05/29/14 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 JOSE SILVA, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. UNIFUND CCR, LLC AND PILOT RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT, LLC Defendants. UNITED STATES
More informationSECTION II: RATES, FEES AND PAYMENT INFORMATION
FR833282333_MILLS FLEET FARM FLEET REWARDS VISA CREDIT CARD T&C DC PDF 32047D, 32047E, 32047F 9/17 SYNCHRONY BANK RATES AND FEES TABLE PRICING INFORMATION Interest Rates and Interest Charges Annual Percentage
More information0% Introductory APR, for the first 12 billing cycles of your account opening.
Sphere 600 SPECIFIC INITIAL PRICING INFORMATION FOR YOUR CREDIT CARD ACCOUNT PART 1 OF 2 Details of Rate, Fee, and Other Cost Information: All account terms are governed by the Credit Card Agreement. Account
More informationFinancial Responsibility Agreements. Presented by: Jeane Olson, Northern Arizona University Rechelle Brown, Coast Professional, Inc.
Financial Responsibility Agreements Presented by: Jeane Olson, Northern Arizona University Rechelle Brown, Coast Professional, Inc. Required Disclaimer * The information contained within this presentation
More informationCase 3:14-cv HU Document 1 Filed 04/01/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Case 3:14-cv-00535-HU Document 1 Filed 04/01/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 1 Michael Fuller, Oregon Bar No. 09357 Attorney for the Silva Family US Bancorp Tower 111 SW 5th Ave., 31st Fl. Portland, OR 97204
More informationSYNCHRONY BANK SECTION I: RATES AND FEES TABLE LOWE S ADVANTAGE CREDIT CARD ACCOUNT AGREEMENT PRICING INFORMATION
FR833282333_LOWES CREDIT CARD T&C PLCC PDF 30807B 6/17 Interest Rates and Interest Charges Annual Percentage Rate (APR) for Purchases How to Avoid Paying Interest Minimum Interest Charge SYNCHRONY BANK
More information2/4/2014. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Update A New Era of Regulation Begins. A Quick Overview of the CFPB. CFPB Overview (cont.
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Update A New Era of Regulation Begins A Quick Overview of the CFPB The CFPB was created by Title X of the Dodd-Frank Act and became operational on July 21, 2011 Independent
More informationFR CRATE AND BARREL AND/OR CB2 CREDIT CARD PLCC TC PDF 37497B 12/18
FR833282333 CRATE AND BARREL AND/OR CB2 CREDIT CARD PLCC TC PDF 37497B 12/18 SYNCHRONY BANK SECTION I: RATES AND FEES TABLE PRICING INFORMATION Interest Rates and Interest Charges Annual Percentage Rate
More informationCase 8:17-cv SCB-MAP Document 20 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 17 PageID 280 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Case 8:17-cv-03038-SCB-MAP Document 20 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 17 PageID 280 NICHOLAS FRANCE and GRETCHEN FRANCE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION Plaintiffs, v.
More informationCompliance in the Collections Industry
Compliance in the Collections Industry Table of Contents Compliance in the Collections Industry...3 Understanding Unfair, Deceptive, or Abusive Acts or Practices (UDAAPs)...4 Fair Debt Collections Practices
More informationFlorida Foreclosure Law E-Book
Florida Foreclosure Law E-Book Simple Guide to Florida Foreclosure Law by: florida Law Advisers, P.A. 1 Table Of Contents INTRODUCTION.... 3 FIGHTING THE FORECLOSURE OF YOUR HOME.... 3 PREDATORY LENDING.....
More informationGene Salvati v. Deutsche Bank National Trust C
2014 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 7-29-2014 Gene Salvati v. Deutsche Bank National Trust C Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No.
More informationThis APR will vary with the market based on the Prime Rate.
TJX [32056M] (11/11)_T&C-I_COMBO_PDF (REV 7/17) M-APPLY / E-APPLY SYNCHRONY BANK RATES AND FEES TABLE TJX REWARDS PLATINUM MASTERCARD AND TJX REWARDS CREDIT CARD ACCOUNT Interest Rates and Interest Charges
More informationAdam P. Jaskievic Associate Attorney American Mortgage Law Group, P.C.
Adam P. Jaskievic Associate Attorney American Mortgage Law Group, P.C. Mr. Jaskievic is an associate attorney with the American Mortgage Law Group, P.C. s Boston, Massachusetts office. He routinely advises
More informationARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CV-15-293 UNIFIRST CORPORATION APPELLANT V. LUDWIG PROPERTIES, INC. D/B/A 71 EXPRESS TRAVEL PLAZA APPELLEE Opinion Delivered December 2, 2015 APPEAL FROM THE SEBASTIAN
More informationThe TSR s New Prohibitions on Certain Payment Methods: Do They Apply to Online Lenders? February 16, 2016
The TSR s New Prohibitions on Certain Payment Methods: Do They Apply to Online Lenders? February 16, 2016 Today s presentation is interactive If you d like to ask a question you may do one of two things:
More informationInsurance Law Update By: Katie E. Jacobi and Michael L. Young HeplerBroom LLC, St. Louis
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 24, Number 1 (24.1.13) Insurance Law Update By: Katie E. Jacobi and Michael L. Young
More informationSYNCHRONY BANK RATES AND FEES TABLE SAM S CLUB MASTERCARD ACCOUNT AGREEMENT PRICING INFORMATION SECTION II: RATES, FEES AND PAYMENT INFORMATION
FR833282333_SAM S CLUB MASTERCARD T&C DC PDF 32052D, 32052F 09/17 Interest Rates and Interest Charges Annual Percentage Rate (APR) for Purchases APR for Cash Advances Paying Interest Minimum Interest Charge
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE CLIFTON CUNNINGHAM and DON TEED, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, -against- Plaintiffs, FEDERAL EXPRESS
More informationOBJECT BY ATTEND A HEARING ON AUGUST 30, 2018 DO NOTHING. Ask to speak in Court about the fairness of the settlement. Get no payment. Give up rights.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Jim Youngman and Robert Allen v. A&B Insurance and Financial, Inc. Case No. 6:16-cv-01478-CEM If calls from A&B Insurance were directed to
More informationCase 1:05-cv RAE Document 36 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 1:05-cv-00408-RAE Document 36 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION NAYDA LOPEZ and BENJAMIN LOPEZ, Case No. 1:05-CV-408 Plaintiffs,
More informationSpeedy Now USER AGREEMENT IMPORTANT TERMS AND CONDITIONS - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY
Speedy Now USER AGREEMENT IMPORTANT TERMS AND CONDITIONS - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY 1. Terms and Conditions. These terms and conditions outlines the terms and conditions, governing your use of the Speedy
More informationCase 2:18-cv SJF-SIL Document 1 Filed 05/25/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 2:18-cv-03095-SJF-SIL Document 1 Filed 05/25/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Alejandro Carrillo, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
More informationPRICING SCHEDULE. APR for Balance Transfers From 11.99% to 23.99%. This APR will vary with the market based on the Prime Rate. 1
PRICING SCHEDULE This is an example of terms that were available to recent applicants as of 9/30/17. They may not be available now. If you apply, your terms will be based on the terms of the offer when
More informationCFPB Policy Considerations and Near Term Priority Goals. NACARA Annual Conference and Training Event October 12, 2016
CFPB Policy Considerations and Near Term Priority Goals NACARA Annual Conference and Training Event October 12, 2016 Four industry-wide problems have been our focus 1 Problem Deception Description Situations
More information2016-CFPB-0005 Document 1 Filed 02/23/2016 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECI'ION BUREAU
2016-CFPB-0005 Document 1 Filed 02/23/2016 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECI'ION BUREAU ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 2016-CFPB- In the Matter of: CONSENT ORDER SOLOMON
More informationThe Republic of China Arbitration Law
The Republic of China Arbitration Law Amended on June 24, 1998 Effective as of December 24, 1998 Articles 8, 54, and 56 are as amended and effective as of July 10, 2002 In case of any discrepancies between
More informationPricing Information Addendum. If you are charged interest, the charge will be no less than $1.50.
Pricing Information Addendum Interest Rates and Interest Charges Annual Percentage Rate Prime Rate plus from 5.99% to 12.99%. (APR) for Purchases This APR will vary with the market based on the Prime Rate.
More informationSYNCHRONY BANK RATES AND FEES TABLE WALMART MASTERCARD ACCOUNT AGREEMENT PRICING INFORMATION SECTION II: RATES, FEES AND PAYMENT INFORMATION
FR833282333_WALMART MASTERCARD T&C DC PDF 32057F, 32057H, 32057K 9/17 Interest Rates and Interest Charges Annual Percentage Rate (APR) for Purchases APR for Cash Advances Paying Interest Minimum Interest
More informationFR WALMART CREDIT CARD TC PLCC PDF 36620C 9/18
FR833282333 WALMART CREDIT CARD TC PLCC PDF 36620C 9/18 SYNCHRONY BANK SECTION I: RATES AND FEES TABLE PRICING INFORMATION Interest Rates and Interest Charges Annual Percentage Rate (APR) for Purchases
More informationWhen Trouble Knocks, Will Directors and Officers Policies Answer?
When Trouble Knocks, Will Directors and Officers Policies Answer? Michael John Miguel Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP Los Angeles, California The limit of liability theory lies within the imagination of the
More informationMFA COMPLIANCE 2016: UNDERSTANDING INSURANCE AND LIABILITY: A FOCUS ON D&O, CYBERSECURITY AND POLICY REVIEWS
MFA COMPLIANCE 2016: UNDERSTANDING INSURANCE AND LIABILITY: A FOCUS ON D&O, CYBERSECURITY AND POLICY REVIEWS Presented by: Lynda A. Bennett Chair, Insurance Recovery Group LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP 973.597.6338
More informationCircuit Court for Prince George s County Case No. CAL UNREPORTED
Circuit Court for Prince George s County Case No. CAL-16-38707 UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 177 September Term, 2017 DAWUD J. BEST v. COHN, GOLDBERG AND DEUTSCH, LLC Berger,
More informationImplementation of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012; Establishment of a
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 11/29/2012 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2012-27672, and on FDsys.gov 6712-01 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
More information