First American International Corp. First American International Bank

Transcription

1 First American International Corp. holding company for First American International Bank Annual Report 2011

2 FIRST AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL CORP. June 14, 2012 Dear Stockholders: As you know, our company, and our subsidiary bank, First American International Bank, faced challenging years in 2009 and 2010, principally as a result of weaknesses in our loan portfolio. These weaknesses followed on the heels of unprecedented economic weaknesses throughout the country, and substantial weaknesses in our local real estate markets. For a number of years, our bank has been involved in providing construction financing for apartment buildings, condominium developments and commercial real estate developments in our market area. These loans were an important component of our mission to aid in community development and revitalization. However, as the economy weakened, these construction loans suffered the hardest. Other loans also suffered from problems due to the economic weaknesses. Throughout 2011, our staff has worked aggressively to turn the corner on these problems and strengthen our loan portfolio. We have sought to resolve satisfactorily as many problem loans as possible. At the same time, our retail banking staff has worked closely with our customers to maintain relationships and keep our position as an important financial institution in our local community. I am pleased to report to you that we have net income of $725,000, after accruing our preferred stock dividends, compared to a net loss of $7,368,000 in Although we still had a provision for loan losses of $3,500,000 in 2011, the trend is positive. Most of that provision was taken in the first quarter of 2011, and we had no provision for loan losses during the third and fourth quarters of 2011, nor did we have any provisions for loan losses in the first quarter of Of course, we can t guarantee that this trend will continue, but we believe that our loan portfolio is now stronger than it has been for a number of years. We also expect that this improvement will result in improved net income during We already started 2012 with the best quarter in the Bank s history. Although we cannot guaranty the same performance for the rest of the year, we believe the outlook for the foreseeable future is positive. Detailed information about our financial results is included in this annual report. We urge you to read it carefully, along with our audited financial statements included at the end of the annual report. As always, we at First American International Corp. welcome your business and we welcome your comments about our results. We look forward to a long and profitable relationship with our stockholders and we look forward to improving stockholder value in the foreseeable future. Alfonso Lau, President

3 SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION The selected data we are presenting below at and for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009 come from our audited consolidated financial statements. Selected Financial Condition Data: Total assets... Loans held for sale... Loans receivable, net... Allowance for loan losses... Other interest-earning assets... At December 31, (In thousands) $533,036 $588,742 $644,264 13,515 20,890 4, , , ,744 15,681 22,174 11,521 90,760 44,850 97,455 Deposits... Borrowings... Stockholders equity ,826 22,567 52, ,547 27,567 52, ,266 28,567 58,969 Selected Operations Data: For the year ended December 31, (In thousands) Interest income... $32,805 $ 36,530 $ 41,136 Interest expense... 6,692 9,375 14,937 Net interest income... 26,113 27,155 26,199 Provision for loan losses... 3,500 22,976 10,153 Net interest income after provision for loan losses... 22,613 4,180 16,046 Non-interest income ,988 7,475 Non-interest expenses... 21,673 23,504 22,124 BEA grant (a) Income before income taxes. 2,235 (11,736) 2,097 Income taxes (5,195) 954 Net income (loss) 1,423 $ (6,541) $ 1,143 Income available (loss attributable) to common stockholders $ (7,368) $ 463 Earnings per share Basic... $0.34 $(3.47) $0.22 Earnings per share Diluted.. $0.34 $(3.47) $0.21 (a) Represents Bank Enterprise Award grants from the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund (a federal government department) for our lending and community investment activities in the amounts shown. i

4 Selected Financial Ratios and Other Data 1 : Performance Ratios: At or for the year ended December 31, Return on average assets (net income to average total assets)....19% (1.05)%.23% Return on average net worth (net income to average net worth) % (11.56)% 2.56% Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities % 119% 114% Net interest rate spread % 4.30% 3.96% Net interest margin % 4.60% 4.43% Net interest income after provision for loan losses to total other expenses % 17.8% 75.0% Non-interest income to total revenue 4.7% 21.8% 32.7% Non-interest expense to total revenue % 67.6% 56.8% Non-interest expense to average assets. 3.78% 3.77% 4.73% Net Worth and Asset Quality Ratios: Average net worth to average total assets. 9.10% 9.09% 9.03% Total net worth to assets end of period % 8.97% 9.19% Non-performing assets to total assets % 9.02% 5.23% Non-performing loans to total loans % 10.37% 6.49% Allowance for loan losses to total loans % 4.35% 2.25% Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans % 41.9% 33.9% Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio % 11.27% 12.87% Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital Ratio 12.66% 9.98% 11.61% Leverage Capital Ratio % 9.04% 10.18% Book value per share... $16.88 $16.93 $19.79 Dividends on common stock (1) Asset quality and net worth ratios are at end of period. All other ratios are based on daily balances. (2) The net interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. (3) The net interest margin, also known as the net yield on average interest-earning assets, represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets. ii

5 Our Business MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS We are a New York-based community banking institution focused on providing full service banking to small businesses, real estate investors and consumers within the Chinese-American market located within Brooklyn, Queens and Manhattan, three of the five boroughs of New York City. The Chinese-American market consists of individuals of Chinese ancestry who were born in the United States, ethnic Chinese who have immigrated to the United States and ethnic Chinese who live abroad but conduct business in the United States. Our primary operating subsidiary, First American International Bank (the Bank ), is a New York-chartered commercial bank. The Bank commenced operations in November 1999 and we established our bank holding company, First American International Corp., in July As of December 31, 2011, we had total assets of $533.0 million, net loans receivable of $387.3 million, total deposits of $451.8 million and total stockholders equity of $52.8 million. During 2010, we began to reduce our level of commercial real estate and construction and development loans, which had grown at a faster rate than our capital growth over the last few years. We continued this process in Our capital and other balance sheet trends are described below. Our business strategy involves a systematic approach toward the establishment of a full service community financial services company. Since the Bank first opened for business in November 1999, our Board of Directors has developed, and management has implemented, policies to grow the size of the Bank through retail branch expansion. The Bank is based in Brooklyn and at year end 2011 it had nine branches, two in Brooklyn, four in Queens, and three in Chinatown in Manhattan. We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock to maximize retained earnings and provide capital support for growth. We have grown faster than our retained earnings would have allowed, so we have raised additional capital in stock offerings after we opened for business. In a transaction that closed on March 13, 2009, we issued $17 million of preferred stock under the U.S. Government TARP CPP program, supplementing our capital. The preferred stock originally had an after tax rate of 5% per year for the first five years and, if not redeemed, the dividend rate was then to increase to 9% per year. We exchanged that stock for new TARP preferred stock with a 2% per year cost for eight years effective August 16, Since the Bank is a Community Development Financial Institution ( CDFI ), we were not required to issue warrants to accompany the preferred stock, as most other non CDFI institutions were required to do. As required by the United States Treasury Department as part of the CPP program, we agreed to dividend limits and corporate governance restrictions. These generally continue so long as we do not redeem the preferred stock and it is not sold to an independent third party not affiliated with the US Treasury. 1. For three years after the closing, we may not pay dividends to our common stockholders in excess of the quarterly dividends we previously paid. In the following seven years, our common stock dividend will be limited to 103% of our prior year s dividends. Since we did not pay any dividends to common stockholders prior to issuing the preferred stock, no dividends will be permitted without the consent of the Treasury Department as long as we do not redeem the preferred stock and it is not sold to an independent third party. 2. We may not repurchase any of our capital stock, equity securities or trust preferred securities. 3. If the preferred stock has not all been redeemed within 10 years, all dividends and stock repurchases are prohibited until the preferred stock is redeemed. 4. Our executive compensation programs are subject to restrictions including limits on both golden parachute payments and incentive compensation or bonus payments based upon unnecessary or excessive risks. There is also a requirement that we have the right to recover back any bonuses or incentive compensation paid based upon reported earnings, gains or other criteria that are later shown to be materially incorrect. We believe that we do not have any plans, contracts or agreements that require payments that would violate these restrictions. We have the right to defer quarterly dividend payments that we are required to make on account of the TARP preferred stock. As discussed below, we began deferring the payment of dividends on the TARP preferred stock in the second quarter of 2011 because the Federal Reserve refused to allow us to make the payments. If we iii

6 continue to defer making the payments for eight calendar quarters, whether or not consecutive, then the authorized number of directors that we have will increase by two members and the holders of the TARP preferred stock will have the right to elect two members of our Board of Directors. If we continue to defer dividends through the first quarter of 2013, the holder of the TARP preferred stock will then have this right to elect two directors. Regulatory Consent Orders In December 2010, the Bank entered into consent orders (the Orders ) with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Superintendent of Banks of the State of New York requiring that, among other things, the Bank: Retain the services of a consultant to develop a written analysis and assessment of the Bank's management needs; Formulate and implement a plan to reduce the Bank s risk position in classified assets and assets designated as special mention, principally loans that are either past due or have other material weaknesses that may result in losses or require special attention from management; Formulate and implement a plan to reduce the concentration of the Bank s assets in non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans and acquisition, development and construction loans; Revise its loan policy to address weaknesses identified by federal and state bank regulators; Revise its procedures for determining the appropriateness of its allowance for loan and lease losses and implement regular quarterly Board of Directors review of the allowance; Improve the Bank s internal audit function, management information system, and Internal Control Policy; Develop and implement a Profit and Budget Plan; Maintain capital ratios of at least an 8% Leverage ratio, a 9% Tier 1 risk-based ratio and a 10% Total riskbased ratio; Not accept, increase, renew, or rollover any brokered deposits; and Establish a Board of Directors Compliance Committee to monitor compliance with the Orders and make quarterly reports to the bank regulators regarding the Bank s activities in furtherance of the Orders. In addition, in March 2011, we entered into an agreement (the Agreement ) with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, acting on behalf of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, pursuant to which we agreed to certain restrictions and limitations, principally related to capital and distributions. In the Agreement, we agreed not to pay any dividends or make any distributions, including dividends on our TARP preferred stock and interest on our trust preferred securities, without advance approval from the Federal Reserve. We also agreed to act as a source of strength for the Bank. The Federal Reserve did not approve our preferred stock dividend and trust preferred interest payments due in the second quarter of 2011, and based upon the continued effectiveness of the Orders and the Agreement, we have not requested permission to make any of the TARP or trust preferred payments in future quarters. However, we accrue those payments for financial statement purposes at the holding company level during any period in which we are prohibited from making the payment, so withholding the payments will provide additional cash but will not affect capital ratios at the holding company level. The Agreement also provides that no new director of our Company may be appointed without advance approval of Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve. In 2011, we sought regulatory approvals for the appointment of Christopher Hooke as a director of both the Bank and our Company. The required approvals were received, and Mr. Hooke is now a director of both the Bank and our Company. Management believes that it is currently in substantial compliance with the requirements of the Orders and the Agreement. Asset Quality During 2009 and 2010, as the real estate economy worsened in our marketplace, we experienced a substantial increase in loan delinquencies and defaults, particularly in our commercial real estate and construction iv

7 loan portfolios. As an indicator of the problem, the Bank s ratio of past due loans to total loans, which had previously been below 1% for almost its entire existence, increased to 5.85% at year end 2009 and further increased to 11.88% at year end As a result of the increase in delinquencies, loan losses also increased. Charge offs of loan losses, which had always been at or near zero in the past, increased to 0.73% of total loans for all of 2009 and to 2.42% of total loans for At December 31, 2010, the Bank had $44.1 million of loans past due 90 days or more. As a result of these weaknesses, management has adopted a multi-faceted approach to improving asset quality. The Bank has increased staffing in the loan department to focus on loan workouts. A Chief Lending Officer was appointed in early 2011 and he is concentrating his efforts on resolving problem loans. The Bank has added two licensed in-house appraisers to assist in the collateral valuation process. Every problem loan is subject to a weekly internal progress review and meetings are held with construction loan borrowers on a monthly basis to assess progress. The Bank has tightened its collateral review process to increase the frequency of reappraisals and other assessments of the value of collateral. While addressing individual problems loans on a micro basis, the Bank has also adopted a number of macro general policies to reduce the risk profile of its loan portfolio. The Bank has temporarily ceased originating nonowner occupied commercial mortgage loans in an effort to reduce its level of such loans to not more than 300% of capital. At December 31, 2011, those loans totaled 423.5% of risk based capital, down from 602.8% of risk based capital at December 31, The Bank has also worked to sell problem loans in its portfolio when acceptable prices could be obtained in order to reach a final resolution of those loans and allow management to concentrate its efforts in other areas. In 2011, the Bank sold $19.8 million of problem loans to independent third parties. The Bank had $3.4 million of loan charge offs and write-downs on the loans that were sold. The Bank is also seeking to enter into appropriate modification or extension agreements with borrowers of troubled loans when management determines that such an arrangement is likely to maximize recovery. All such modifications or extensions are approved by the Board s Loan Committee or the full Board of Directors. On a quarterly basis during 2011, management evaluated the weaknesses in the Bank s loan portfolio and determined the appropriate allowance for loan losses that the Bank was required to maintain in order to reflect losses probable and incurred in the portfolio. The Board of Directors then undertook a review of management s quarterly analysis to verify the processes undertaken and the reasonableness of the determinations. As a result of this process, the Bank determined each quarter the appropriate level of its allowance for loan losses. If the existing allowance was less than the amount determined to be appropriate, the Bank recorded a provision for loan losses to increase the allowance to the level deemed appropriate. During 2011, the Bank recorded an aggregate provision for loan losses of $3,500,000, which compares favorably to the provision for loan losses of $22,976,000 during The allowance for loan and lease losses was $15,681,000, or 3.89% of total loans, at December 31, 2011, compared to $22,174,000, or 4.51% of total loans, at December 31, The loan department continues to exert regular efforts to realize upon existing problem loans. There is an individual action plan for all classified or special mention loans. These action plans generally seek to maximize recovery of a problem loan through the use of one of the following strategies: On construction loans, working with borrowers to allow sufficient time to complete construction, obtain a certificate of occupancy and either rent the space to tenants who can provide funds to service the loan, sell the property, or obtain permanent financing from another lender; Selling loans to third party investors, usually at a discount, when that strategy is believed to maximize recovery for the Bank; Restructuring mortgage loans to reduce a borrower s payment obligation to give the borrower the opportunity to find rent-paying tenants, improve an operating business or otherwise solve short term problems that caused a payment default; If a satisfactory resolution leaving the borrower in place is not feasible, seeking to acquire the real property by deed in lieu of foreclosure to allow the Bank to take prompt control of the property and proceed to an orderly liquidation; or v

8 When other methods of maximizing recovery do not appear likely to be successful, commencing a foreclosure or other legal action to acquire title to mortgaged property or otherwise to collect on the debt through the legal process. The ability of the Bank to resolve satisfactorily its problem loans depends, in substantial part, on the local economy. If the real estate market in Manhattan, Brooklyn and Queens continues to stagnate, or worse if there are additional value declines, our losses on problem loans may increase. We are exerting what we believe to be appropriate efforts to address the weaknesses in our loan portfolio, but there can be no assurance that additional losses will not arise. Comparison of Financial Condition at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 Total assets were $533,036,000 at December 31, 2011, a decrease of $55,706,000, or 9.5%, from $588,742,000 at December 31, This decrease was principally the result of a reduction in the loan portfolio. At December 31, 2011, loans receivable, net were $387,258,000, a reduction of 17.5% from $469,592,000 at December 31, The reduction was caused by a combination of factors. These included normal scheduled principal payments; borrower refinances and payoffs due to borrower sales of the mortgaged property; the reclassification of some loans to loans held for sale in preparation for the sale of those loans; the actual sale of loans; and loan charge-offs. The allowance for loan losses reduces gross loans in reporting loans, net, and thus a net reduction in the allowance of $6,493,000 partially offsets the reported decline in loans, net. The loan portfolio was not replenished with new loans because the Bank ceased originating new commercial mortgage loans, including construction loans. The Bank instead sought to originate 1-4 family residential mortgage loans for portfolio investment and for sale to FNMA. Loans originated for sale to FNMA do not require significant capital or balance sheet funding. Liquid overnight assets, including cash, due from banks, and federal funds sold, were $49,007,000 at December 31, 2011, compared to $31,640,000 at December 31, The $17, 367,000 increase in liquid assets occurred because of a lack of available investment securities with acceptable yields at a time when our loan originations were reduced. Our liquidity is adequate for our funding needs, with additional funds available from liquid securities investments and lines of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York ( FHLBNY ). Total deposits were $451,826,000 at December 31, 2011, declining $51,721,000, or 10.3 %, from $503,547,000 at December 31, The principal deposit categories at December 31, 2011 were $58,101,000 in demand deposit accounts; $138,198,000 in savings and money market accounts; and $255,527,000 in time certificates of deposit. This compares to December 31, 2010 amounts of $58,032,000 in demand deposit accounts; $158,965,000 in savings and money market accounts; and $286,549,000 in time certificates of deposit. We did not aggressively compete for certificates of deposit in 2011 to reduce our cost of funds at a time when we did not need additional funds for asset growth. We had borrowings of $22,567,000 at December 31, 2011, compared to $27,567,000 at December 31, These borrowings included a $7.2 million junior subordinated debenture that we issued in connection with our trust preferred securities transaction in December 2004 and FHLBNY advances with fixed rates and initial terms from three to ten years that we obtained principally to lengthen the average maturity of our liabilities. From time to time, we use borrowings as an interest rate risk management tool by engaging in fixed-rate borrowings with longer terms to repricing than our deposit liabilities. We can also use borrowings to provide funds for asset growth when sufficient funds are not available from deposit growth. We did not have to increase borrowings on our FHLBNY line of credit as a funding source in The FHLBNY line is relatively low cost and provides an additional source of liquidity over and above branch deposits. We had unused availability on our line of credit with the FHLBNY of more than $90,000,000 at the end of Total stockholders equity was $52,815,000 at December 31, 2011, compared with $52,920,000 at December 31, The $105,000 decrease in stockholders equity was principally due to a $1,191,000 increase in the unrealized loss on our securities available for sale portfolio and a $337,000 reduction related to our TARP preferred stock, partially offset by net income of $1,423,000. vi

9 The following table shows our regulatory capital ratios and those of the Bank for the quarter ended December 31, FAIC The Bank Tier I Leverage Capital Ratio % 10.27% Tier I Risk-Based Capital Ratio % 12.60% Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio % 13.88% All of the above ratios exceed the minimum ratios necessary to be considered well-capitalized under applicable federal regulations and the levels necessary to satisfy the requirements of the Orders, as discussed above. See Note 15 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information about our capital ratios. Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 General. We had net income of $1,423,000 in 2011, compared to a net loss of $6,541,000 in Results for 2010 include a $22,976,000 provision for loan losses, compared to a $3,500,000 provision in The reduction in the provision for loan losses in 2011 was the principal reason for the improvement in net income. Interest Income. Interest income was $32,805,000 for 2011 compared to $36,530,000 in 2010, a decrease of $3,725,000 or 10.2%. The primary reason for the decrease was a substantial decline in our volume of loans, which are our highest-yielding asset category. Average loans were $514,069,000 in 2010 but declined to $456,672,000 in 2011, a decline of 11.2%. This decline was partially offset by increases in average securities investments and federal funds sold, resulting in an overall decrease in average earning assets of 7.1% from $590,870,000 in 2010 to $548,745,000 in The average yield on earning assets declined from 6.19% in 2010 to 5.95% in The decrease in earning assets was primarily driven by our decision to reduce balance sheet risk by suspending the origination of new construction and commercial real estate loans. We also elected to concentrate our loan department efforts on addressing weaknesses in our construction loan and other commercial real estate loan portfolios. Loans decreased from an average of 87.0% of earning assets in 2010 to 83.2% of earning assets in This change in mix away from our highest yielding asset category contributed to the decline in average earning asset yields. We estimate that the decrease in the average volume of loans from 2010 to 2011 resulted in a $3,874,000 decrease in interest income and the decrease in the average rate on loans reduced interest income by $940,000. The remainder of the loan yield decline was principally due to two factors: (i) a reduction in the origination of residential mortgage loans for sale to Fannie Mae, which reduced the amount of origination fee income that the Bank recognized as interest income and (ii) the historically low market interest conditions which continued during We estimate that the fees earned on loans sold to FNMA contributed 36 basis points to our yield on loans in 2010, compared to16 basis points in In addition, many of our commercial mortgage loans were originated with ten or fifteen year terms and rates of interest that adjust every five years. However, we imposed minimum interest rates (floors) on many of those loans and the floor is usually the initial interest rate. Thus, for example, the yields on loans originated 2005 did not decline when the interest rates were adjusted in 2010 as much as the decline in the prime rate from 2005 to The interest rate floors thus buffered the decline that would have otherwise occurred as interest rates declined during 2007 and 2008 and then remained relatively level from 2009 through Our average yield on interest-earning assets decreased from 6.19% in 2010 to 5.95% in 2011, as the decline in loan yield caused the overall average yield to decline by 24 basis points. Non-loan interest earning assets increased from an average of 13% of earning assets in 2010 to 17% in During 2011, we would have recognized approximately $2,300,000 of interest income on non-accrual loans if those loans had been paid according to their terms, but we recognized only $265,000 of interest on those loans vii

10 when we actually received that interest on a cash basis. In comparison, in 2010, $2,900,000 of interest income should have been received on non-accrual loans, but we actually recognized only $285,000 of that interest during Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased from $9,375,000 in 2010 to $6,692,000 in This decrease of $2,683,000, or 28.6%, was principally due to continued low market interest rates in 2011, which allowed us to lower our average cost of deposits by 39 basis points from 1.75% in 2010 to 1.36% in In addition, our decision to reduce loan originations also contributed to the decline in interest expense because we did not need to compete aggressively for deposits to fund loan growth. The effect of our ability to decrease deposit rates was reflected in a 36 basis point decline in the average cost of savings and money market accounts, due to reductions in the rates we paid on those accounts, as well as a 43 basis point decline in the average cost of certificates of deposit as existing deposits matured and were replaced with new certificates of deposit at lower rates. Slightly offsetting the decline in rates was a minor shift in the mix of deposits towards certificates of deposit, our highest cost deposit funding source, and away from savings and money market deposits, which have lower costs. This reversed a trend we experienced from 2009 to Certificates of deposit represented 74% of average deposits in 2009, 65% in 2010 and 66% in We did not aggressively compete for deposits because our funding needs were reduced as we reduced our portfolio of commercial real estate loans, which had been the largest component of our loan portfolio. The decrease in the average volume of certificates of deposit resulted in a decrease of $331,000 of interest expense from 2010 to 2011, while the decrease in average cost resulted in a decrease of $1,255,000 in interest expense. The decrease in the volume of savings and money market accounts generated a $167,000 decrease in interest expense, while the decrease in the rate we paid on those accounts generated a $539,000 decrease in interest expense. Net Interest Income. Net interest income decreased by $1,042,000 from $27,155,000 in 2010 to $26,113,000 in 2011, representing the combined effect of the $3,725,000 decrease in interest income partially offset by the $2,683,000 decrease in interest expense. Because the rate we paid on our liabilities decreased by 0.42%, which was more than the decrease of 0.24% in rate we earned on our assets, our average spread, representing the difference between the rate we earn on our interest-earning assets and the rate we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities, improved from 4.30% in 2010 to 4.49% in 2011, an increase of 19 basis points. Our net interest margin increased by 13 basis points, from 4.60% in 2010 to 4.73% in The margin increased less than the spread because the margin factors in the effect of non-interest bearing liabilities and the lower overall yields on assets meant that non-interest bearing deposits were less valuable when we were able to invest them only at lower yields. Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses results from our analysis of the appropriateness of our allowance for loan losses. If we determine that an increase in the allowance is warranted, then the increase is accomplished through a provision for loan losses, which is an expense on our income statement. The provision for loan losses was $3,500,000 in 2011, compared to $22,976,000 for The provision that we record each year is the amount that we believe is necessary to maintain an allowance for loan losses that is appropriate for our loan portfolio, based upon the risks in the portfolio. In 2008, we began to experience weaknesses in our loan portfolio, principally construction and other commercial real estate loans. These problems accelerated in 2009 and As a result, we recorded a substantial provision for loan losses in 2010 to increase our allowance for loan losses to the level we believed appropriate to address the loan portfolio weaknesses. We had loan charge offs of $12,324,000 in 2010 and $10,575,000 in 2011, which are considerably higher than our experience of prior years, when there were limited loan losses. We had recoveries of $1,000 in 2010 and recoveries of $583,000 in Recoveries are added back to the allowance for loan losses. During 2010, even after the charge-offs, we experienced a substantial increase in problem loans, with non-performing loans increasing from $30,201,000 at year end 2009 to $52,681,000 at year end During 2011, non-performing loans declined and totaled $24,662,000 at December 31, 2011 as a result of loan sales, the repayment of some non-performing loans, charge-offs, transfers of loans to other real estate, and the restoration of loans to performing status as the result of a consistent period of regular payment. viii

11 When a loan is categorized as nonperforming, we do not return it to accruing status until the loan is brought current and the borrower makes regular and consistent payments on the loan. These regular payments must continue for at least six months and sometimes longer, depending upon the circumstances of the loan, before we treat the loan as a performing loan once again. We evaluate the appropriateness of our allowance for loan losses by first analyzing, on a loan by loan basis for all loans in our loan portfolio, the potential loss on all impaired loans. Impaired loans are loans for which we believe it is probable that we will not receive all principal and interest according to the original loan terms. We calculate our expected recovery on each impaired loan based upon either the present value of expected future cash flows on the loan, the fair value of the collateral less the costs of getting control over and selling the collateral, or the observable market price (which normally applies only to loans held for sale). Residential one-to-four family consumer mortgage loans that are impaired are evaluated monthly. All other impaired loans in the loan portfolio are also evaluated monthly. All unimpaired loans are evaluated collectively in homogenous groups of loans with similar characteristics. We first consider our historical loss experience for each type of loan, adjust the historical experience based upon out assessment of current environmental facts, and then we determine an appropriate percentage to apply to the amount of loans of that type in our portfolio. The process is designed to determine the appropriate allowance component for loan of that type. Once the process is completed, we add the estimated appropriate allowance for the unimpaired loans to the appropriate amount determined on a loan by loan basis for impaired loans. The result is the amount of allowance for loan losses that we consider to be appropriate. If the actual allowance on our books is less than the calculated appropriate allowance, then we record a provision for loan losses sufficient to bring the allowance up to an appropriate level. The process is repeated each calendar quarter, first with an evaluation by officers and staff, and then with a review by the Board of Directors. At December 31, 2011, our allowance for loan losses was $15,681,000, or 3.88% of total loans, compared to $22,174,000, or 4.5% of total loans, at year end Both the dollar amount of the allowance and the percentage of total loans covered by the allowance declined from year end 2010 to year end 2011 because of efforts undertaken during 2011 to resolve problem loans. We believe that, at December 31, 2011, the risks remaining in the loan portfolio had declined, requiring a lower allowance for loan losses. Although we consider the allowance to be appropriate, there is uncertainty in the estimates we use to determine the magnitude of the allowance. In addition, changed circumstances in the future may adversely affect our loan portfolio, the ability of our borrowers to repay, and the value of the collateral for our loans. We can give no assurance that material additions to the allowance will not be necessary in the future, particularly if real estate market conditions deteriorate. If significant additional provisions for loan losses are required in the future, there could be a material adverse effect on net income. Non-interest Income. Our non-interest income for 2011 was $1,295,000, compared to $7,588,000, for There were two principal reasons for the decline, both of which are components of an aggregate $4,189,000 loss on the sale of loans. First, we sold a number of nonperforming or other problem commercial mortgage loans that were designated as loans held for sale at an aggregate net loss of $2,523,000 in When a loan is first designated as held for sale, the carrying value of the loan is written down to the fair value and any write down is charged to the allowance for loan losses. Thereafter, any further decline in the value of the loan and a sale at less than our carrying value are included as components of the loss on the sale of loans. In addition, due to accelerated prepayment of residential mortgage loans during 2011 and other factors affecting the value of our mortgage servicing rights portfolio, we reduced the recorded value of that portfolio by $1,666,000. This amount is also reflected as a component of the loss on sale of loans because the mortgage servicing portfolio was originally created when loans were sold and we retained the servicing rights. A decrease in the sales of 1-4 family residential mortgage loans to FNMA also contributed to a reduction of the gain on sale of loans. We originated $51,647,000 of residential mortgage loans for sale in 2011 compared to $235,255,000 in The decrease in origination volume was the result of a decision during 2011 to focus on strengthening the administrative process of originating and servicing residential mortgage loans and improving quality control procedures, which reduced the origination of new loans, principally during the first part of In addition, many competitors stopped or reduced originating residential loans for sale in 2009 and 2010, but they re-entered the ix

12 market in Towards the end of 2011, volume increased and reached $26,210,000 of residential loans originated for sale in the fourth quarter of Volume in 2012 is difficult to predict because it will depend upon many uncertain factors, such as the strength of the housing market, interest rate conditions, competition, and the strength of the economy in general. We had a $285,000 increase in gains on sales of securities in 2011 versus 2010 because the values of interest-bearing investment securities increased as market interest rates remained very low. Fee income from customer service transactions declined by $387,000, or 7.6%, from 2010 to 2011 primarily due to the decline in FNMA activity. Our principal fee-based customer services include deposit fees, safe deposit rentals, and investment and insurance sales. We received a BEA grant of $448,000 in 2011, which decreased from the $600,000 grant received in Our BEA grant revenue since 2001 has totaled approximately $6.6 million. In 2011, as in prior years, the BEA grant was awarded by an office of the United States Treasury Department for our incremental level of lending in low and moderate income census tracts in New York. We expect that we will apply for another BEA grant in 2012, but have no assurance of such award since it is dependent on various competitive factors and government budgeting and policy decisions that are not under our control. Non-interest Expense. Our non-interest expense for 2011 was $21,673,000, compared to $23,504,000 in The $1,831,000 reduction was primarily due to cost controls implemented by the Bank, including a reduction in full time equivalent employees from 183 in 2010 to 177 in Earlier in 2011, full time equivalent employees were even lower, but we hired additional employees towards the end of As a result, salaries and employee benefit expenses declined by $854,000, or 7.9%, from 2010 to Other declines in noninterest expense included a $520,000 decline in our provision for loan repurchase expense due to a reduction in loan repurchase demands from FNMA and a $982,000 decline in loan processing fees due to decline in lending activities. These improvements were partially offset by a $232,000 increase in FDIC assessment expense and a $647,000 increase in insurance expense due to a decision to increase insurance coverage, principally with respect to distressed real estate loans. Income Taxes. For 2011, we had income tax expense of $812,000, representing 36.3% of pre-tax income. For 2010, we recorded an income tax benefit of $5, or 48.3% of our pretax loss. The different between the effective tax rates of 36.31% for 2011 and 44.43% for 2010 is 8.1%. We incur taxes at the federal, state and local levels on substantially all of our income. Liquidity Liquidity represents funds available to us for operating, investing and financing activities. Our primary sources of funds are deposits, borrowings, sales of loans and other assets, and payments we receive on loans and investment securities. Our primary uses of those funds are making loans and purchasing investment securities. Liquidity also provides us with the ability to meet customer withdrawals from their deposit accounts. At December 31, 2011, cash and cash equivalents, which include cash and due from banks, money market accounts, and federal funds sold, were $49,007,000, or 9.19% of total assets. During 2011, our principal sources of cash were $31,135,000 in principal payments we received on our securities portfolio and $71,690,000 representing a decrease in loans receivable. These funds, combined with available case at the beginning of 2011, were used principally to purchase $53,398,000 of new securities and fund a $51,721,000 decrease in deposits. We also received $9,254,000, net, in proceeds upon the sale of loans originated or held for sale. As a net result of these and other transactions, we experienced a $17,367,000 increase in cash and cash equivalents in We did not aggressively seek new deposits because yields available to us on investment securities were very low due to low market interest rates and we reduced our origination of loans, as discussed above. At December 31, 2011, we had a line of credit with the FHLBNY with unused capacity of approximately $90,000,000, which is available to us for liquidity purposes. This liquidity line of credit can be increased by x

13 pledging additional collateral, in the form of securities, loans or cash. We currently have sufficient qualifying collateral to provide short term liquidity if needed. Certificates of deposit at December 31, 2011 that were scheduled to mature in 2012 were $194,214,000. Based on historical patterns of our depositors, we believe that we will retain a significant portion of these deposits. We also believe that sources of funds will be adequate to meet our short and long-term liquidity needs. Forward-Looking Statements When used in this Annual Report, or in any written or oral statement made by us or our officers, directors or employees, the words and phrases will result, expect, will continue, anticipate, estimate, project, should or similar terms are intended to identify forward-looking statements. A variety of factors could cause our actual results and experiences to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in any forward-looking statements. The following is a non-exclusive list of some of the risks and uncertainties that may affect our operations, performance, development and results: deterioration in local, regional, national or global economic conditions which could result in, among other things, an increase in loan delinquencies, a decrease in property values, or a change in the real estate turnover rate; changes in market interest rates or changes in the speed at which market interest rates change; changes in laws and regulations affecting the financial service industry; changes in the public s perception of financial institutions in general and banks in particular; changes in competition; and changes in consumer preferences by our customers or the customers of our business borrowers. In addition, may important factors used to evaluate our bank s condition or results, such as the interest rate sensitivity of our assets and liabilities, and the adequacy of our loan loss allowance, inherently involve forwardlooking assessments of the future and represent forward-looking statements. Whether those forward-looking assessments turn out to be correct likewise depends upon, among other factors, the risks and uncertainties set forth above. Please do not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement, which speaks only as of the date made. There are many factors, including those described above, that could affect our future business activities or financial performance and could cause our actual future results or circumstances to differ materially from those we anticipate or project. We do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement after it is made. xi

14 FIRST AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December31,2011 and2010

15 Brooklyn, New York CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2011and2010 CONTENTS REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS... 1 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION... CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME... CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY... CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

16 Crowe Horwath. Crowe Horwath LLP Independent Member Crowe Hor.vath International REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS Board of Directors and Stockholders First American International Corp. and Subsidiaries Brooklyn, New York We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of First American International Corp. and Subsidiaries ("Company") as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. New York, New York May 10, 2012 Crowe Horwath LLP 1

17 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION December 31, 2011 and ASSETS Cash and due from banks - noninterest bearing $ 5,179,755 $ 13,583,700 Due from banks - interest-bearing overnight and money market accounts 42,295,828 16,840,351 Federal funds sold - overnight 1,531, Total cash and cash equivalents 49,006,583 31,640,051 Time deposits with banks 196, ,414 Securities available for sale 45,299,692 24,859,467 Residential mortgage loans held for sale 7,446,250 2,630,000 Commercial loans held for sale 6,068,489 18,259,687 Loans receivable, net 387,257, ,591,826 Bank premises and equipment, net 13,910,920 14,135,333 Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") stock, at cost 1,437,300 1,639,900 Accrued interest receivable 2,417,028 2,975,323 Other real estate owned 1,081, ,000 Mortgage servicing rights 5,319,926 6,950,000 Prepaid Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") insurance 1,489,138 3,194,664 Other assets ,391,567 $ :143 $ 588 B2232 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Liabilities Deposits Demand $ 58,101,460 $ 58,032,445 NOW 1,895,305 1,756,472 Money market and savings 136,302, ,208,904 Time deposits, less than $100, ,997, ,807,823 Time deposits, $100,000 and over 108,529, Total deposits 451,825, ,546,680 Other borrowed funds 15,350,000 20,350,000 Junior subordinated debentures 7,217,000 7,217,000 Accrued interest payable 2,103, 125 2,070,851 Accounts payable and other liabilities 3,724,813 2,637,909 Total liabilities 480,220, ,822,440 Commitments and contingencies Stockholders' equity Series B preferred stock, $0.10 par value; 17,000 shares authorized; 17,000 shares issued and aggregate liquidation value of $17,255,000 and $17,000,000 at December 31, 2011 and ,700 1,700 Preferred stock, $0.10 par value; 750,000 shares authorized; no shares issued Common stock, $.0001 par value; 3,000,000 shares authorized; and 2,123,711 shares issued and outstanding Additional paid-in capital 54,917,093 54,555,967 Treasury stock, 2,500 shares of common stock at cost (68,000) (68,000) Retained earnings (deficit) (1,641,683) (2,367,087) Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (394,000) Total stockholders' equity 52,815,322 52,919,792 $ :143 $ 588B2 232 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 2

18 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME Years ended December 31, 2011and Interest income Loans, including fees $ 30,652,277 $ 35,442,580 Securities 2,067,517 1,000,085 Due from banks and money market accounts 80,023 82,991 Federal funds sold ,805,495 36,530,460 Interest expense Deposits 5,879,964 8,170,670 Other borrowed funds 630,950 1,020,271 Junior subordinated debentures ,130 6, ,375,071 Net interest income 26,113,235 27,155,389 Provision for loan losses 3,500, ,547 Net interest income after provision for loan losses 22,613,235 4,179,842 Noninterest income Service and transaction fees 4,690,201 5,077,522 Gain on sale of securities, net 345,351 60,206 Grants from U.S. Treasury Department 448, ,000 (loss) gain on sale of loans, net (4, 189,378) 1,850,507 1,294,644 7,588,235 Noninterest expenses Salaries and employee benefits General and administrative Depreciation, amortization and occupancy 9,955,155 7,794,483 3,923,310 21,672,948 10,808,928 8,679,330 4,015,426 23,503,684 Income (loss) before income tax expense 2,234,931 (11,735,607) Income tax expense (benefit) 811,551 (5,195,100) Net income (loss) 1.423,380 (6,540,507) Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion Net income available (loss attributable) to common stockholders $ Z $ (Z ~68 ~ZZ) See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 3

19 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 Preferred Stock {Accumulated Accumulated (Series A and 8) Common Stock Additional Treasuet Stock Deficit) Other Number of Number of Paid-in Number of Retained Comprehensive Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital Shares Amount Earnings Income!Loss) Total 17,000 $ 170 2,116,611 $ 212 $ 54,385,070 (2,500) $ (68,000) $ 5,001,290 $ (350,000) $ 58, (6,540,507) {6,540,507) 1,147, {5,393,507) 1,530 (1,530) 172,427 (172,427) (655,443) (655,443) 17,000 1,700 2, 116, ,555,967 (2,500) (68,000) (2,367,087) 797,000 52,919,792 1,423,380 1,423,380 (1,191,000) ( ) 232, (697,976) ( ) $ "'=$ =~21~2 $ ) $ ) $ { ) $ ) $ See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 4

20 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS Years ended December 31, 2011 and Cash flows from operating activities Net income (loss) $ 1,423,380 $ (6,540,507) Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities Deferred taxes 2,210,742 (5, 106,076) Provision for loan losses 3,500,000 22,975,547 Gain on sale of securities (345,351) (60,206) Loss (Gain) on sale of residential mortgage and commercial loans 4,189,378 (1,850,507) Depreciation 878, ,931 Loss on write down of other real estate owned 363,515 Residential mortgage loans originated for sale (51,646,813) (235,254,749) Proceeds from sales of residential mortgage and commercial loans originated for sale 60,900, ,524,756 Net change in deferred loan fees (189,146) (388,918) Decrease (Increase) in accrued interest receivable 558, ,119 Increase in other assets and prepaid FDIC insurance 2,391, ,366 Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable, accounts payable and other liabilities 864,230 (753,265) Net cash provided by operating activities 25,098,514 14,005,439 Cash flows from investing activities Proceeds from maturities, sales, and calls of securities 31, 134,856 38,448,207 Purchases of securities (53,397, 730) (31,915,958) Redemption of FHLB stock 202,600 36,400 Decrease in time deposits with banks 98,000 98,188 Net (increase) decrease in loans receivable 71,689,806 (9,683,824) Capital expenditures (653,717) (547,688) Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 49,073,815 (3,574,675) Cash flows from financing activities Dividends paid on preferred stock (85,000) (655,443) Repayment of other borrowed funds (5,000,000) (11,000,000) Proceeds from other borrowed funds 10,000,000 Net increase (decrease) in deposits (51,720,797) (47,719,789) Net cash used in financing activities (56,805, 797) (49,375,232) Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents 17,366,532 (38,944,468) Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 31,640,051 70,584,519 Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $ ~9 QQ6 56;3 ~ ;3:1 6~Q Q5:l Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information Cash paid (received) for Interest $ 6,659,985 $ 11,002,328 Income taxes (1,353,751) (1,084,232) Supplemental non-cash disclosures Transfer of loans to other real estate owned $ 1,265,000 $ Transfer of loans to commercial loans held for sale 6,068,489 18,259,687 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 5

21 December 31, 2011 and 2010 NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Nature of Operations and Principles of Consolidation: First American International Corp. ("Company") is a bank holding company headquartered in Sunset Park, Brooklyn, New York. Through its subsidiaries, First American International Bank ("Bank") and FAIC Insurance Services, Inc., the Company provides individuals, corporations and other businesses, and institutions with commercial and retail banking services, including loans and deposits, mortgage banking, insurance and other financial services. The Bank is a New York State chartered commercial bank. The Bank is a member of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") and provides full banking services to customers through its headquarters branch and eight other branch locations in Brooklyn, Queens and Manhattan. The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Use of Estimates: To prepare financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (or with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles) management makes estimates and assumptions based on available information. These estimates and assumptions affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the disclosures provided, and actual results could differ. The allowance for loan losses, mortgage servicing rights, and fair value of financial instruments are particularly subject to change. Cash Flows: For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash and amounts with maturities less than 90 days including due from banks, interest and noninterest bearing, overnight, money market accounts and federal funds sold. Net cash flows are reported for customer loan and deposit transactions, interest bearing deposits in other financial institutions, and federal funds purchased. Interest-Bearing Deposits in Other Financial Institutions: Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions, including money market funds and time deposits with other financial institutions, mature within one year and are carried at cost. Securities: Debt securities are classified as held to maturity and carried at amortized cost when management has the positive intent and ability to hold them to maturity. Debt securities are classified as available for sale when they might be sold before maturity. Securities available for sale are carried at fair value, with unrealized holding gains and losses reported in other comprehensive income, net of tax. Interest income includes amortization of purchase premium or discount. Premiums and discounts on securities are amortized on the level-yield method without anticipating prepayments, except for mortgage backed securities where prepayments are anticipated. Gains and losses on sales are recorded on the trade date and determined using the specific identification method. Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment ("OTTI") on at least a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation. For securities in an unrealized loss position, management considers the extent and duration of the unrealized loss, and the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer. Management also assesses whether it intends to sell, or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell, a security in an unrealized loss position before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met, the entire difference between amortized cost and fair value is recognized as impairment through earnings. For debt securities that do not meet the aforementioned criteria, the amount of impairment is split into two components as follows: 1) OTT! related to credit loss, which must be recognized in the income statement and 2) other-than-temporary impairment (OTT!) related to other factors, which is recognized in other comprehensive income. The credit loss is defined as the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis. For equity securities, the entire amount of impairment is recognized through earnings. 6

22 December 31, 2011 and 2010 NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Loans Held for Sale: Loans intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value in the aggregate. Net unrealized losses, if any, are recognized through a valuation allowance by charges to income. Mortgage loans originated for sale are generally sold with servicing rights retained. The carrying value of mortgage loans sold is reduced by the amount allocated to the servicing right. Gains and losses on sales of mortgage loans are based on the difference between the selling price and the carrying value of the related loan sold. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company held $6 million and $18 million in commercial loans held for sale that the Company intends to sell in the subsequent year. Prior to the Company's intentions to sell these loans, the loans were held for investment as loans receivable. Loans: Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are reported at the principal balance outstanding, net of unearned interest, deferred loan fees and costs, and an allowance for loan losses. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees, net of certain direct origination costs, are deferred and recognized in interest income using the level-yield method without anticipating prepayments. Interest income on mortgage, commercial, and consumer loans is discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days delinquent unless the loan is well-secured and in process of collection. Past due status is based on the contractual terms of the loan. In all cases, loans are placed on nonaccrual or charged-off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful. All interest accrued but not received for loans placed on nonaccrual is reversed against interest income. Interest received on such loans is accounted for on the cash-basis or cost-recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured. Allowance for Loan Losses: The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit losses. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. Management estimates the allowance balance required using past loan loss experience, the nature and volume of the portfolio, information about specific borrower situations and estimated collateral values, economic conditions, and other factors. Allocations of the allowance may be made for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in management's judgment, should be charged off. The allowance consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans that are individually classified as impaired. The general component covers non-classified loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for current factors. A loan is impaired when full payment under the loan terms is not expected. Commercial and commercial real estate loans are individually evaluated for impairment. If a loan is impaired, a portion of the allowance is allocated so that the loan is reported, net, at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan's existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans, such as consumer and residential real estate loans, are collectively evaluated for impairment, and accordingly, they are not separately identified for impairment disclosures. Loans for which the terms have been modified resulting in a concession, and for which the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties, are considered troubled debt restructurings and classified as impaired. 7

23 December 31, 2011 and 2010 NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The general component covers non-impaired loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for current factors. The current factors for which the Bank evaluates, when determining adjustments to the historical loss factors, include changes to or the strength of the Bank's underwriting and related policies and procedures, economic trends within the tri-state area, changes within the composition of the portfolio, related to either changes in underlying loan types or the underlying past due or non-accrual status within that loan type, changes in management and staff, trends within the underlying collateral values, regulatory factors, and evaluation of credit concentrations. The following portfolio segments have been identified: Commercial and industrial loans, commercial real estate loans, residential real estate loans, and consumer and installment loans. Commercial and Industrial Loans: Commercial credit is extended to commercial customers for use in normal business operations to finance working capital needs, equipment purchases, or other projects. The majority of these borrowers are customers doing business within our geographic regions. These loans are generally underwritten individually and secured with the assets of the borrower and the personal guarantee of the business owners. Commercial loans are made based primarily on the historical and projected cash flow of the borrower and the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. Commercial Real Estate Loans: Commercial real estate loans, including multifamily, are subject to underwriting standards and processes similar to commercial loans. These loans are viewed primarily as cash flow loans and the repayment of these loans is largely dependent on the successful operation of the property. Loan performance may be adversely affected by factors impacting the general economy or conditions specific to the real estate market such as geographic location and property type. Commercial real estate loans also include construction loans, which are primarily collateralized by the acquired land and the constructed premises. These loans require continuous attention and monitoring of the construction progress. The repayment of these loans is contingent upon the borrower's ability to complete and sell the constructed property or generate enough rental income to service the permanent debt. As a result the risk with these loans is that they are contingent upon future events whose probability at the time of origination is uncertain. Therefore these loans receive a higher risk rating than all other loan types. Residential Real Estate Loans: Residential mortgage loans represent loans to consumers for the purchase or refinance of a one-to-four family residence. These loans are generally financed as 15 to 30 year fixed rate mortgages, and in most cases, are extended to borrowers to finance their primary residence. Real estate market values at the time of origination directly affect the amount of credit extended and, in the event of default, subsequent changes in these values may impact the severity of losses. Consumer and Installment Loans: Consumer loans are primarily comprised of lines of credit or closed-end loans secured by second mortgages. The maximum amount of a home equity line of credit is generally limited to 80% (with acceptable credit scores) of the appraised value of the property less the balance of the first mortgage. Consumer loans also include installment loans made directly to consumers. These loans have a specific matrix which consists of several factors including debt to income, type of collateral and loan to collateral value, credit history and relationship with the borrower. 8

24 December 31, 2011 and 2010 NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Troubled debt restructurings are separately identified for impairment disclosures and are measured at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan's effective rate at inception. If a troubled debt restructuring is considered to be a collateral dependent loan, the loan is reported, net, at the fair value of the collateral. For troubled debt restructurings that subsequently default, the Company determines the amount of reserve in accordance with the accounting policy for the allowance for loan losses. Bank Premises and Equipment: Land is carried at cost. Premises and equipment are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are computed on the straightline method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, or lease term, whichever is shorter. Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") Stock: The Bank is a member of the FHLB system. Members are required to own a certain amount of stock based on the level of borrowings and other factors, and may invest in additional amounts. FHLB stock is carried at cost, classified as a restricted security, and periodically evaluated for impairment based on ultimate recovery of par value. Both cash and stock dividends are reported as income. Servicing Rights: Servicing rights are recognized separately when they are created through sales of loans. When mortgage loans are sold, servicing rights are initially recorded at fair value with the income statement effect recorded in gains on sales of loans. Fair value is based on market prices for comparable mortgage servicing contracts, when available or alternatively, is based on a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing income. All classes of servicing assets are subsequently measured using the amortization method which requires servicing rights to be amortized into non-interest income in proportion to, and over the period of, the estimated future net servicing income of the underlying loans. Servicing assets are evaluated for impairment based upon the fair value of the rights as compared to carrying amount. Impairment is determined by stratifying rights into groupings based on predominant risk characteristics, such as interest rate, loan type and investor type. Impairment is recognized through a valuation allowance for an individual grouping, to the extent that fair value is less than the carrying amount. During 2011, the Company recognized impairment in the amount of $1,630,000. If the Company later determines that all or a portion of the impairment no longer exists for a particular grouping, a reduction of the allowance may be recorded as an increase to income. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, there was no valuation allowance established. The fair values of servicing rights are subject to significant fluctuations as a result of changes in estimated and actual prepayment speeds and default rates and losses. Servicing assets were approximately $5,320,000 and $6,950,000 at December 31, 2011 and During 2011 and 2010, additions to mortgage servicing rights by recognition of servicing rights pursuant to loans sales with servicing retained of $533,000 and $2,012,000 were recorded. Amortization expense of $2, 163,000 and $1,362,000 was recognized during the years ended December 31, 2011 and The fair value of servicing rights was $5,320,000 and $7, 104,000 at yearends 2011 and Fair value was determined using a discount rate of 11%, prepayment speeds ranging from % to 16.48%, depending on the stratification of the specific right, and a weighted average default rate of.59%. The unpaid principal balance of loans serviced for others, which are not included in the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition, were approximately $804,656,000 and $820,264,000 at December 31, 2011 and

25 December31, 2011and2010 NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Servicing fee income recorded for fees earned for servicing loans, net of direct expenses, is reported on the income statement with service and transaction fees. The fees are based on a contractual percentage of the outstanding principal, and are recorded as income when earned. The amortization of mortgage servicing rights is netted against loan servicing fee income. Net servicing fees totaled $2,023,463 and $1,868,415 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and Net servicing fees are reported within the service and transaction fees line item on the consolidated statements of income. Late fees and ancillary fees related to loan servicing are not material. Real Estate Owned: Assets acquired through or instead of loan foreclosure are initially recorded at fair value less costs to sell when acquired, establishing a new cost basis. These assets are subsequently accounted for at lower of cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell. If fair value declines subsequent to foreclosure, a valuation allowance is recorded through expense. Operating costs after acquisition are expensed. Income Taxes: Income tax expense is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable and the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the expected future tax amounts for the temporary differences between carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities, computed using enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance, if needed, reduces deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. A tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is "more likely than not" that the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination being presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized on examination. For tax positions not meeting the "more likely than not" test, no tax benefit is recorded. The Company recognizes interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. Stock-Based Compensation: Compensation cost is recognized for stock options issued to employees based on the fair value of these awards at the date of grant. A Black-Scholes model is utilized to estimate the fair value of stock options. Compensation cost is recognized over the required service period, generally defined as the vesting period. Comprehensive Income (Loss): Comprehensive income (loss) is defined to include all changes in equity except those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. Other comprehensive income (loss) consists of the change in unrealized gain (loss) on securities available-for-sale, net of reclassification adjustments and tax effects. Concentrations of Credit Risk: Financial instruments which potentially subject the Bank to concentration of credit risk consist primarily of temporary cash investments, which include due from banks, and loans receivable. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Bank had approximately $2,500,000 and $7,500,000, respectively, in deposit balances at certain financial institutions which were in excess of usual federallyinsured limits. Substantially all of the balances are covered by the FDIC under a Temporary Guaranty Program. The Bank also maintains due from bank accounts with various foreign financial institutions. These deposits, which are not insured, were approximately $142,000 and $830,000 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Bank limits the amount of credit exposure with any one financial institution and believes that no significant concentration of credit risk exists with respect to these cash investments. The majority of the Bank's loans and loan commitments have been granted to customers in the Bank's market area. Accordingly, the collectibility of loans and management's ability to increase net interest income will be impacted, to some extent, by economic conditions in Metropolitan New York. 10

26 December 31, 2011 and 2010 NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Fair Value of Financial Instruments: Fair values of financial instruments are estimated using relevant market information and other assumptions, as more fully disclosed in a separate note. Fair value estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment regarding interest rates, credit risk, prepayments, and other factors, especially in the absence of broad markets for particular items. Changes in assumptions or in market conditions could significantly affect the estimates. Adoption of New Accounting Standards: In April 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") amended existing guidance for assisting a creditor in determining whether a restructuring is a troubled debt restructuring. The amendments clarify the guidance for a creditor's evaluation of whether it has granted a concession and whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties. With regard to determining whether a concession has been granted, the Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") clarifies that creditors are precluded from using the effective interest method to determine whether a concession has been granted. In the absence of using the effective interest method, a creditor must now focus on other considerations such as the value of the underlying collateral, evaluation of other collateral or guarantees, the debtor's ability to access other funds at market rates, interest rate increases and whether the restructuring results in a delay in payment that is insignificant. This guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, including interim reporting periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. The Company expects to adopt this guidance when it becomes effective during the 2012 annual reporting period. The adoption of this guidance is expected to impact the allowance for loan losses estimate and related disclosures. In May 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to achieve common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements between U.S. and international accounting principles. Overall, the guidance is consistent with existing U.S. accounting principles; however, there are some amendments that change a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The amendments in this guidance are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this amendment on the consolidated financial statements. In June 2011, the FASB amended existing guidance and eliminated the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in shareholder's equity. The amendment requires that comprehensive income be presented in either a single continuous statement or in two separate consecutive statements. The amendments in this guidance are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, and interim and annual periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted. The Company expects to adopt this guidance when it becomes effective during the 2012 annual reporting period. The adoption of this amendment will change the presentation of the components of comprehensive income for the Company as part of the consolidated statement of stockholders' equity. Reclassifications: Some items in the prior year financial statements were reclassified to conform to the current presentation. Subsequent Events: The Bank has evaluated subsequent events for recognition and disclosure through May 10, 2012, which is the date the financial statements were available to be issued. 11

27 December 31, 2011 and 2010 NOTE 2 - SECURITIES The amortized cost and fair value of securities available for sale, and related gross unrealized gains and losses, were as follows: Gross Gross Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Fair Cost Gains Losses Values December Municipal securities $ 1,298,774 $ 53,070 $ (773) $ 1,351,071 Asset backed securities 3,578,284 (91,871) 3,486,413 Mortgage backed securities 5,506,714 52,633 (64,786) 5,494,561 U.S. Treasury securities 6,992, ,232 7,191,876 Corporate note securities 11,510,933 39,763 (769,334) 10,781,362 Collateralized mortgage obligations 13,138,880 99,819 (225,917) 13,012,782 Mutual funds {7,836) 3,981,627 $ $ $ ( ) $ December31, 2010 Municipal securities $ 253,725 $ $ (4,575) $ 249,150 Corporate note securities 4,004,131 11,959 (74,689) 3,941,401 Collateralized loan obligations 9,631,000 1,293,836 10,924,836 Mortgage backed securities {64,925) 9,744,080 $ $ $ ( ) $ The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities by contractual maturity at year-end 2011 were as follows: Available For Sale Amortized Fair Cost Values Due before one year $ 268,757 $ 268, 172 Due after one year through five years 11,999,225 12,056,808 Due five years through ten years 7,143,643 7,071,607 Due over ten years 26,604,067 25,903,105 $ $ Securities with carrying amounts of approximately $5, 185,392 and $0 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, were pledged as collateral to secure borrowings. During 2011, proceeds from sales of securities were $26,423, 112 with gross realized gains of $1,658, 145 and gross losses of $1,312,794. During 2010, proceeds from sales of securities were $34,055,762 with gross realized gains of $485,634 and gross losses of $425,

28 December 31, 2011 and 2010 NOTE 2 - SECURITIES Securities with unrealized losses at year-end 2011 and 2010, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, are as follows: Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or Greater Totals Fair Unrealized Fair Unrealized Fair Unrealized Values Losses Values Losses Values Losses December 31, 2011 Municipal securities $ - $ - $ 250,723 $ (773) $ 250,723 $ (773) Asset backed securities 3,169,651 (72,048) 316,762 (19,823) 3,486,413 (91,871) Mortgage backed securities 3,441,375 (64,786) 3,441,375 (64,786) Corporate notes 7,427,874 (711,514) 738,204 (57,820) 8,166,078 (769,334) Collateralized mortgage obligations 7,941,029 (211,796) 374,645 (14,121) 8,315,674 (225,917) Mutual funds 2,986,043 (7,836) 2,986,043 (7,836) Total $ $ ( ) $ $ (92 537) $ $( ) Oecember31, 2010 Municipal securities $ 249,150 $ (4,575) $ - $ - $ 249,150 $ (4,575) Corporate notes 2,322,714 (73,908) 541,300 (781) 2,864,014 (74,689) Mortgage backed securities (64,925) (64,925) Total $ 6 Z $ (:143 4Q8) $ 541 3QQ $ (Z81) $ z $ (:144189) At December 31, 2011, the majority of the gross unrealized losses have existed for a period of less than twelve months. Unrealized losses on debt securities have not been realized because the issuers continue to pay interest and principal as expected and required, management does not intend to sell and it is not more likely than not that management would be required to sell the securities prior to their anticipated recovery, or the decline in fair value is largely due to changes in interest rates and other market conditions. The fair value is expected to recover as the bonds approach maturity. Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when conditions warrant such evaluation. Factors considered in determining whether an impairment is other-than-temporary includes the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and whether management intends to sell and it is not more likely than not that management would be required to sell the securities prior to their anticipated recovery. The policies followed by Bank management limit the type of investment instruments that can be purchased. These are limited to high quality securities with a rating between AAA through a3 or BBB-. The types of securities purchased consist of U.S. Treasury bills and notes, bonds issued by Government-sponsored entities and highly rated corporate bonds and mortgage backed securities. Mutual funds included in the above table apply strategies to achieve a mix of investments in debt securities including governments and their agencies, corporations, financial institutions, supranational organizations, and securities backed by mortgages and other assets. 13

29 December 31, 2011 and 2010 NOTE 3- LOANS RECEIVABLE The summary of the balance of loans receivable for December 31 were as follows: Real estate - commercial $ 280,450,434 $ 395, 142,692 Real estate- residential 111,922,255 90,065,790 Commercial and industrial 11,265,564 7,092,934 Consumer and installment 236, , ,874, ,890,524 Less: Net deferred loan fees (935,914) (1, 125,060) Allowance for loan losses (15,681,396) (22, 173,638) Loans receivable, net $ $ Activity in the allowance for loan losses was as follows: Balance at beginning of year $ 22,173,638 $ 11,521,258 Provision for loan losses 3,500,000 22,975,547 Charge-offs (10,575,242) ( 12,323,842) Recoveries 583, Balance at end of year $ :1 392 ~ 22.:lZ The following table presents the activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the year ending December 31, 2011: Real Estate Real Estate Commercial Consumer and Commercial Residential and Industrial Installment Total December 31, 2011 Allowance for loan losses: Beginning balance $ 19,324,912 $ 1,045,488 $ 1,800,378 $ 2,860 $ 22,173,638 Provision for loan losses 357,552 1,381,837 1,760,899 (288) 3,500,000 Loans charged-off (7,873,180) (809,099) (1,892,721) (242) (10,575,242) Recoveries Total ending allowance balance $ :12 3Q3 :IZ9 $ :1 mm820 $ :I 686 Q6Z $ 2 33Q $ :15 68:

30 December 31, 2011 and 2010 NOTE 3 - LOANS RECEIVABLE The following tables present the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment and based on impairment method as of December 31, 2011 and 2010: Real Estate Real Estate Commercial Consumer and Commercial Residential and Industrial Installment Total December 31, 2011 Allowance for loan losses: Ending allowance balance attributable to loans: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 3,520,959 $ 53,091 $ 702,263 $ $ 4,276,313 Collectively evaluated for impairment 8,782,220 1,636, ,804 2,330 11,405,083 Acquired with deteriorated credit quality Total ending allowance balance $ : :ll9 $ :l Q $ :l 686 Q6Z $ 2 33Q $ :1568:1 396 Loans: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 26,891,257 $ 3,622,322 $ 2,999,650 $ $ 33,513,229 Collectively evaluated for impairment 253,559, ,299,933 8,265, , ,361,758 Acquired with deteriorated credit quality Total ending allowance balance $ 28Q 45Q 434 $ :1: $ jj $ 236 Z34 $ Z December 31, 2010 Allowance for loan losses: Ending allowance balance attributable to loans: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 8,545,589 $ 297,341 $ 1,317,227 $ $ 10,160,157 Collectively evaluated for impairment 10,779, , ,151 2,860 12,013,481 Acquired with deteriorated credit quality Total ending allowance balance $ :l :12 $ : $ :1SQQ3Z8 $ 2860 $ 221Z3 638 Loans: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 45,226,490 $ 2,369,993 $ 4,683,469 $ $ 52,279,952 Collectively evaluated for impairment 349,916,202 87,695,797 2,409, , ,610,572 Acquired with deteriorated credit quality Total ending allowance balance $ 395 H2 692 $ 90 Q $ z $ 589 :108 $ Q

31 December 31, 2011 and 201 O NOTE 3- LOANS RECEIVABLE The following table presents information related to loans individually evaluated for impairment by class of loans as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011: Unpaid Allowance Principal Recorded For Loan Balance Investment Losses December With no related allowance recorded: Real estate - commercial $ 12,590,263 $ 11,535,494 $ Real estate - residential 3,165,135 2,815,672 Commercial and industrial 2,822,800 1,641,264 Consumer and installment With an allowance recorded: Real estate - commercial 17,897,151 15,355,763 3,520,959 Real estate - residential 806, ,650 53,091 Commercial and industrial 1,857,347 1,358, ,263 Consumer and installment j j3 229 $ 4 2Z6 3j3 December O With no related allowance recorded: Real estate - commercial $ 4,075,768 $ 2,949,751 $ Real estate - residential 441, ,317 Commercial and industrial 890, , 115 Consumer and installment With an allowance recorded: Real estate - commercial 43,630,037 42,276,739 8,545,589 Real estate - residential 1,972,453 1,928, ,341 Commercial and industrial 3,793,354 3,793,354 1,317,227 Consumer and installment $ $ 52 2Z9 952 $ Z The following table presents information for loans individually evaluated for impairment as of December 31, 2011 and 201 O: Average of individually impaired loans during period $ 46, 140,893 $ 41,240,661 Interest income recognized during impairment Cash basis interest income recognized 285,000 16

32 December 31, 2011 and 2010 NOTE 3 - LOANS RECEIVABLE The following tables present the recorded investment in nonaccrual and loans past due over 90 days with interest still on accrual by class of loans as of December 31, 2011 and 2010: Nonaccrual Loans Past Due Over 90 Days Still Accruing Real estate - commercial $ 20,991,947 $ 47,037,167 $ $ Real estate - residential 2,531,581 1,767,470 Commercial and industrial 1,138,769 3,872,371 Consumer and installment 4092 Total $ Z :s 52 68:1 :lqq $ $ Nonaccrual loans include both smaller balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment and individually classified impaired loans. The following tables present the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans by class of loans as of December 31, 2011 and 2010: Greater Than Loans Days Days 90 Days Total Not Past Due Past Due Past Due Past Due Past Due Total December 31, 2011 Real estate - commercial $ 1,951,752 $ 2,006,940 $ 19,355,429 $ 23,314, 121 $ 257,136,313 $ 280,450,434 Real estate - residential 405,941 2,531,581 2,937, ,984, ,922,255 Commercial and industrial 162,386 1,138,769 1,301,155 9,964,409 11,265,564 Commercial and installment , Total $ $ 2 OOZ 462 : IZ9. :11 2Z :11 3Z $ 103 8H 9.8Z December 31, 2010 Real estate - commercial $ 12,246,532 $ 1,488,668 $ 40,074,430 $ 53,809,630 $ 341,333,062 $ ,692 Real estate - residential 701,075 14,543 1,424, 101 2,139,719 87,926,071 90,065,790 Commercial and industrial 2,592,804 2,592,804 4,500,130 7,092,934 Commercial and installment Total $ $ $ Z $ $ $ Troubled Debt Restructurings: The Company has allocated $91,982 and $440,220 of specific reserves to customers whose loan terms have been modified in troubled debt restructurings as of December 31, 2011 and The Company has not committed to lend any additional amounts as of December 31, 2011 and 201 O, to customers with outstanding loans that are classified as troubled debt restructurings. During the years ending December 31, 2011 and 2010, the terms of certain loans were modified as troubled debt restructurings. The modification of the terms of such loans included one or a combination of the following: a reduction of the stated interest rate of the loan; an extension of the maturity date at a stated rate of interest lower than the current market rate for new debt with similar risk; or a permanent reduction of the recorded investment in the loan. 17

33 December 31, 2011 and 2010 NOTE 3- LOANS RECEIVABLE The Company will consider troubled debt restructures where: (a) the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties. (b) When adverse financial or legal events have decreased the likelihood that the Company will receive payment in full in accordance with the original loan terms. (c) a troubled debt restructuring may be granted to borrowers who the Company determines are willing to work with the Company to repay their debts and the troubled debt restructuring increases the likelihood that the Company will maximize its recovery on the loan. Modifications involving a reduction of the stated interest rate of the loan were for periods ranging from 6 months to 3 years. Modifications involving an extension of the maturity date were for periods ranging from 6 to 36 months. The following table presents loans by class modified as troubled debt restructurings that occurred during the year ending December 31, 2011: Pre- Post- Modification Modification Outstanding Outstanding Number Recorded Recorded of Loans Investment Investment Troubled Debt Restructurings: Real estate - commercial 5 $ 2,053,096 $ 1,405,642 Real estate - residential 3 1,030, ,066 Commercial and industrial 6 1,834, ,080 Consumer and installment Total 14 $ 4,917,526 $ 3,175,788 The troubled debt restructurings described above impacted the allowance for loan losses by recoveries of $91,982 and charge offs of $1, 128,988 during the year ending December 31, The following table presents loans by class modified as troubled debt restructurings for which there was a payment default within twelve months following the modification during the year ending December 31, 2011: Number Recorded of Loans Investment Troubled Debt Restructurings That Subsequently Defaulted: Real estate - commercial 3 $ 392,980 Real estate - residential 1 194,834 Commercial and industrial Consumer and installment Total 4 $ A loan is considered to be in payment default once it is 90 days contractually past due under the modified terms. The trouble debt restructurings that subsequently defaulted described above did not impact the allowance for loan losses during the year ending December 31,

34 December 31, 2011 and 2010 NOTE 3 - LOANS RECEIVABLE In order to determine whether a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, an evaluation is performed of the probability that the borrower will be in payment default on any of its debt in the foreseeable future without the modification. This evaluation is performed under the Company's internal underwriting policy. Certain loans, which were modified during the year ending December 31, 2011, did not meet the definition of a troubled debt restructurings as the modification was a delay in a payment that was considered to be insignificant. Credit Quality Indicators: The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company analyzes loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. This analysis includes loans with an outstanding balance greater than $250,000 and non-homogeneous loans, such as commercial and commercial real estate loans. This analysis is performed on a quarterly basis. For performing non-delinquent residential, home equity and consumer loans the Bank classifies these as pass rated loans. The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings: Special Mention - Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves management's close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution's credit position at some future date. Substandard - Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obliger or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a welldefined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Doubtful - Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. Loans not meeting the criteria above that are analyzed individually as part of the above described process are considered to be pass rated loans. Based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans by class of loans as of December 31, 2011 is as follows: Pass S12ecial Mention Substandard Doubtful Total Real estate - commercial Real estate - residential Commercial and industrial Consumer and installment $ 207,560, ,490,083 7,970, $ 29,688, ,456 $ 43,201,197 3,432,172 1,803,650 $ 496,186 $ 280,450, ,922,255 11,265, ,734 Total $ Z 6:l :l $ 3Q 6!H :ll:l $ 48 43l Q:l9 $ 496 :186 $ 4Q38H98Z In the normal course of business, the Bank may make loans to officers and directors, and companies in which they have a beneficial ownership (related parties). There were twenty two loans in the amount of $4,725,413 outstanding as of December 31, 2011, to related parties. There twenty five loans in the amount of $4,895,334 outstanding as of December 31, 2010, to related parties. 19

35 December 31, 2011 and 201 O NOTE 4 - REAL EST ATE OWNED Activity in real estate owned was as follows: Beginning of year $ 180,000 $ 180,000 Transfer from loan portfolio 1,265,000 Additions charged to expense Direct write-downs (363,515) End of year $ ~ Expenses related to foreclosed assets include: Net loss (gain) on sales $ $ Provision for unrealized losses Operating expenses, net of rental income 266, $ $ NOTE 5 - BANK PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT The cost and accumulated depreciation and amortization of bank premises and equipment at year-end were as follows: Land $ 400,000 $ 400,000 Buildings and improvements 13,641,617 13,630,700 Furniture, fixtures, automobiles and equipment 5, 131,008 4,999,045 Construction-in-progress 989, ,162,111 19,505,018 Less: Accumulated depreciation (6,251I191) (5,369,685) Depreciation expense was $878, 130 and $895,931 for 2011 and 2010, respectively. $ : Q ~ j~

36 December31, 2011and2010 NOTE 6 - DEPOSITS Scheduled maturities of time deposits for the next five years were as follows: 2012 $ 194,214, ,939, ,131, ,983, ,551 $ Z45 Deposits at December 31, 2011 and 2010, from related parties, which include officers, directors, stockholders and companies in which Directors of the Board have a significant ownership interest, approximated $2,247,435 and $2,558,412, respectively. NOTE 7 - OTHER BORROWED FUNDS The Bank is a member of the FHLB of New York. As such, it is eligible to borrow funds at various terms and maturities offered by the FHLB of New York. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Bank had borrowings of $15,350,000 and $20,350,000, respectively, with terms and maturities as follows: December 31, 2011 Maturity Amount Interest Rate 2012 $ 5,350, % ,000, Total $ December 31, 2010 Maturity Amount Interest Rate 2011 $ 5,000, % ,350, ,000, Total $ 2Q ~SQ OQQ The amount of loans pledged as collateral was approximately $173,000,000 and $181,000,000 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. 21

37 December 31, 2011 and 2010 NOTE 8 - JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES The Company formed First American International Statutory Trust I ("Trust"), a Delaware statutory trust in December The Trust issued 7,000 units of 30-year fixed/floating rate capital securities with an aggregate liquidation amount of $7,000,000 to an independent investor and all of its common securities, amounting to $217,000, to the Company, which is included in other assets. The capital securities of the Trust, which are non-callable for five years until December 15, 2009, mature in 2034 and are a pooled trust preferred fund of Preferred Term Securities XVI, Ltd. The Company has the option to defer interest payments on the subordinated debentures from time to time for a period not to exceed five consecutive years. The Company issued to the Trust a $7,217, year fixed/floating rate junior subordinated deferrable interest debenture having substantially similar terms. The subordinated debenture is the sole asset of the Trust. For regulatory reporting purposes, the Federal Reserve Board has indicated that the capital securities qualify as Tier I capital of the Company subject to previously specified limitations, until further notice. If regulators make a determination that the capital securities can no longer be considered in regulatory capital, the securities become callable and the Company may redeem them. The capital securities and the subordinated debenture pay interest and dividends, respectively, on a quarterly basis, at a fixed rate per annum of 6.25% through December 15, 2009, and thereafter at a rate per annum equal to the 3-month LIBOR plus 2.25% through final maturity on December 15, The rate for the three month period ended March 15, 2011, was 2.55%. Interest expense on the junior subordinated debentures was $181,346 and $184, 130 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and The Bank entered consent orders, as discussed in Note 15, with its regulators that require regulatory approval beginning in June 2011 to continue payment of dividends. As of December 31, 2011, the Bank has not received regulatory approval to continue payment of dividends. NOTE 9 - GRANTS During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Bank received grants of $448,470 and $600,000, respectively, from the U.S. Treasury Department as an award in recognition of its lending and community development activities under the Bank Enterprise Award Program. These grants were recorded as income during the years granted. NOTE 10-INCOME TAXES Allocation of federal, state and local income taxes follows for the year ended December 31: Current Federal $ (1,306,409) $ (175, 100) State and local {92,782) 86,076 (1,399,191) (89,024) Deferred Federal 1,818,904 (3,141,900) State and local 391,838 {1,964,176) 2,210,742 {5, 106,076) ~ 8:1:1 55:1 ~ (5 :195 l QQ) 22

38 December 31, 2011 and 201 O NOTE 10- INCOME TAXES The income tax expense differs from that computed at federal statutory rates due to the following at year ended December 31: Tax at federal statutory rate of 34% $ 759,877 $ (3,990,124) Increase (decrease) resulting from: Meals and entertainment 9,096 10,787 State and local taxes, net of federal income tax benefit 197,377 (1,239,546) Other (154,799) Total income tax expense $ ~ (5, ) The component of the net deferred tax asset follows: Allowance for loan losses $ 7,075,944 $ 10,005,450 Net unrealized loss on securities 597,251 Rent 944, ,292 Accrued reserves 107, ,005 Nonqualified stock options 183, ,974 Net operating losses 421,172 41,141 Deferred losses 164,030 Other ,949 9,598,777 11,345,811 Less: Deferred tax liability from depreciation (652,311) (724,938) Net unrealized gain on securities (440,673) Net deferred tax asset ~ ~ j Q, j 8Q,2QQ The net deferred tax asset is included in other assets in the consolidated statements of financial condition. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the estimated reversal of deferred tax items, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon projections for future taxable income over the periods, in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes it is more likely than not the Bank will realize the deferred asset recognized at December 31, 2011 and The Bank operates in New York State and New York City. At December 31, 2011, the Bank has New York State and New York City net operating loss carry forward of $3,844,662 and $3,725,335 which can be carried forward 20 years. It is anticipated that the Bank will utilize these losses in full. The Company is subject to examination by all taxing jurisdictions for years after The Company recognizes interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. The Company did not have any uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and does not anticipate any significant accrual of uncertain tax benefits in the next 12 months. 23

39 December31, 2011and2010 NOTE 11 - GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES General and administrative expenses consist of the following: Data processing $ 1,343,999 $ 1,371,620 Professional fees 2,683,435 2,584,784 Office expense 659, ,703 Stationary and printing 178, ,981 Marketing and advertising 303, ,572 Loan processing fees 298,293 1,280,792 Loan repurchase provision 519,948 Staff training 53,172 49,784 FDIC assessment expense 1,453,761 1,221,275 Insurance 729,658 82,592 Other 90, $ $ NOTE 12 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Litigation: The Company is a party to various legal actions normally associated with financial institutions, the aggregate of which, in management's opinion, would not have a material adverse effect on the financial position of the Company. Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk: The Bank is a party to financial instruments with offbalance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the financial statements. The Bank's exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the following off-balance sheet financial instruments were outstanding whose contract amounts represent credit risk: Loan commitments $ 18,505,000 $ 11,228,000 Unfunded commitments under lines of credit 31,235,000 45,907,000 Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. The commitments are structured as fixed rate and tied to Prime. Since some of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Bank evaluates each customer's creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained if deemed necessary by the Bank upon extension of credit is based on management's credit evaluation of the customer. Collateral held varies but may include personal or commercial real estate, accounts receivable, inventory and equipment. 24

40 December 31, 2011 and 201 o NOTE 12 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Unfunded commitments under commercial lines of credit and revolving credit lines are commitments for possible future extensions of credit to existing customers. Loan Sales Commitments to Federal Mortgage Association ("FNMA" or "Fannie Mae"): Best efforts commitments to deliver loans at fixed prices to the secondary mortgage market totaled $15,558,000 and $6,704,000 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Leases: The Bank leases branch and office space in Sunset Park, Brooklyn, New York; Manhattan, New York; and Queens, New York, under non-cancelable lease agreements expiring at various dates through 2023, excluding renewal options. At December 31, 2011, future minimum rentals under lease agreements are approximately as follows: 2012 $ 2,652, ,663, ,481, ,421, ,950,000 Thereafter $ 20,454,000 Total rental expense for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, was approximately $2,348,000 and $2,530,000, respectively. The leases contain a clause providing that the Bank pay for property taxes, maintenance, and utilities for the premises. NOTE 13 - DEFERRED COMPENSATION Deferred Compensation Plans: The Company has unfunded deferred compensation plans for certain officers of the Bank, as defined, and all directors of the Bank and the Company. Under the program, participants, in the case of officers, may defer receipt of all or a specified portion of regular salaries or bonuses and, in the case of directors, defer all or a specified portion of fees for service as a director and earn interest on their deferred amounts as described in the plans. No compensation amounts have been deferred by eligible participants under these plans since their inception. Salary Deferral Plan: In April 2005, the Company implemented a qualified 401 (k) salary deferral plan ("Plan") for all eligible employees who are at least 21 years of age, who have been employees for one consecutive year and who are credited with 1,000 hours of service as an employee during the Plan year. Service prior to implementation of the Plan was included for the purpose of determining eligibility to participate. Each participant may elect to make salary deferral contributions to the Plan on a pretax basis. Compensation for purposes of the 401 (k) was capped at $210,000 annually (subject to cost of living adjustments). Employee salary deferral contributions are immediately vested. More than 90% of all eligible employees elected to participate in the Plan. The Company does not match employee contributions. 25

41 December31, 2011and2010 NOTE 14 - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS The Company's has 3,000,000 shares of authorized common stock. The Company has reserved 600,000 shares of common stock for issuance of options under the following stock-based compensation plans and 2,400,000 shares of common stock are available for general purposes. Under the Company's 2000 and 2005 Incentive Stock Option Plans, options to purchase 150,000 shares (for each plan) of the Company's common stock may be granted to employees. The exercise price of each option granted under the plans may not be less than 100% of the fair market value (as defined} of the Company's common stock on the date of the grant. However. for a grantee who owns stock possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of capital stock of the Company, the exercise price of each option granted shall not be less than 110% of the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the date of the grant. The term of each option shall be determined by a committee of the Board of Directors but in no event may an option be exercisable more than 10 years after the date of grant, except for a more than 10% stockholder, whose options may be exercised no more than five years after the date of grant. Under the Company's 2000 and 2005 Directors Stock Option Plans, options to purchase up to 150,000 shares (for each plan) of the Company's common stock may be granted to directors who are not employees of the Company. The exercise price of each option granted under the plan may not be less than 100% of the fair market value (as defined) of the Company's common stock on the date of the grant. The term of each option shall be determined by a committee of the Board of Directors but in no event may an option be exercisable more than 10 years after the date of grant. The right to grant awards under the 2000 Incentive and Directors' Stock Option Plans terminated on February 22, The right to grant awards under the 2005 Incentive and Directors' Stock Option Plans will terminate on March 15, The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using a closed form option valuation (Black-Scholes) model that uses various assumptions including the risk-free interest, expected term, expected stock price volatility, and dividend yield rates. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatilities of the Company's common stock. The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercise and post-vesting termination behavior. (Employee and management options are tracked separately.) The expected term of options granted is based on historical data and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding, which takes into account that the options are not transferable. The risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant. 26

42 December 31, 2011 and 2010 NOTE 14 - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS There were no options granted in 2011 and The options vested immediately upon granting. A summary of the activity in the stock option plan for 2011 follows: Outstanding at beginning of year 339,025 $ Granted Exercised Expired Forfeited 57, Weighted Weighted Average Average Remaining Aggregate Exercise Contractual Intrinsic Shares Price Term (Years) Value Outstanding at end of year $ $ Exercisable at year-end 281,035 ~ ~ As of December 31, 2011, there was no unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options granted under the Plan. NOTE 15-STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY/REGULATORY MATTERS The Company, on a consolidated basis, and the Bank are subject to various minimum regulatory capital requirements administered by the Federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company's and the Bank's financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors. Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable to bank holding companies. Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the accompanying table) of total and Tier I Capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier I Capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of December 31, 2011, that the Company and the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject. As described in the next paragraph, the Bank is not well capitalized at December 31, 2011 and 2010, due to regulatory consent orders that the Bank has entered with its regulators. 27

43 December 31, 2011 and 2010 NOTE 15 - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY/REGULATORY MATTERS In December 2010, the Bank entered into parallel Consent Orders (the "Consent Orders") with the FDIC and the Department of Banking of the State of New York ("NYSBD") in which it agreed among other things to improve supervision of the Bank by its Directors, develop a detailed 12 month operating budget develop plans to reduce loan concentrations for construction and non owner occupied commercial real estate loans, strengthen its processes for computation of allowance for loan losses, reduce the amount of classified, delinquent and nonaccrual assets, and strengthen its internal control policies and procedures. It also agreed to maintain specified thresholds of regulatory capital ratios (generally in excess of "well capitalized" thresholds-see below for description of "well-capitalized" thresholds) of 8% for tier 1 capital to average assets, 9% for tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets and 10% for total capital to risk weighted assets and to develop capital plans if such new thresholds were breached. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Bank's capital ratios exceeded the thresholds established by the Consent Orders. To date, the Bank has met all its deliverable requirements under the consent order and is working on executing on the plans and requirements to achieve reductions in loan concentrations, delinquent and classified assets, reductions in nonaccrual loans. It has also maintained its regulatory capital levels above the specified thresholds. The Company's and the Bank's actual capital amounts and ratios are also presented in the following tables: Minimum Capital Minimum to be Well Requirements Capitalized Under For Capital Prompt Corrective Actual Adeguacy Puq2oses Action Regulations Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio (Dollars in thousands) 2011 Total Capital to risk weighted assets Company $ 60, % $ 34, % $ N/A NIA Bank* 60, , , % Tier I Capital to risk weighted assets Company 55, , NIA NIA Bank* 54, , , Tier I Capital to average assets Company 54, , NIA NIA Bank* 54, , ,

44 December 31, 2011 and 2010 NOTE 15- STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY/REGULATORY MATTERS Minimum Capital Minimum to be Well Requirements Capitalized Under For Capital Prompt Corrective Actual Adequacy Purposes Action Regulations Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio (Dollars in thousands) 2010 Total Capital to risk weighted assets Company $ 60, % $ 42, % $ NIA NIA Bank* 59, , , % Tier I Capital to risk weighted assets Company 53, , NIA NIA Bank* 52, , , Tier I Capital to average assets Company 53, , NIA NIA Bank* 52, , , * Pursuant to the December 2010 Consent Orders, the Bank is required to maintain total capital to risk weighted assets of 10%; tier I capital to risk weighted assets of 9%; and tier I capital to average assets of 8%. Dividends: The Bank is subject to various regulatory restrictions on its ability to pay dividends to the Company. The Bank may declare and pay a dividend only out of its net profits. The approval of the New York Superintendent of Banks is required if the total of all dividends declared in any calendar year will exceed the Bank's net profits for that year plus the retained net profits of the preceding two years, subject to certain adjustments. In addition, the Bank may not pay any dividend if the dividend would cause its capital to be reduced so that the Bank is no longer at least adequately capitalized. At December 31, 2011, as a result of the restrictions under the Consent Orders, the Bank's retained earnings available for payment of dividends to the Company, without the approval of the New York Superintendent of Banks was $0. The Company is also subject to various dividend restrictions as a result of its participation in the U.S. Treasury's TARP CPP program as described more fully in Note 17. NOTE 16- DISCLOSURES ABOUT ESTIMATED FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values: Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date. Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data. Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entity's own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. 29

45 December 31, 2011 and 2010 NOTE 16 - DISCLOSURES ABOUT ESTIMATED FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS The fair values of securities available for sale are determined by matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used to in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities' relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs). The fair value of impaired loans with specific allocations of the allowance for loan losses is generally based on either recent real estate appraisals or, for loans with modification agreements in place, discounted cash flow analyses. The fair value of real estate owned ("REO") is generally based on recent real estate appraisals. In valuing either impaired loans with specific allocations of the allowance for loan losses or real estate owned, appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments are usually significant and typically result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value. As previously disclosed in note 1, the fair values of real estate owned are recorded at lower of cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell and loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value, as determined by outstanding commitments, from third party investors. Also, as previously disclosed, the fair value of servicing rights is based on market prices for comparable mortgage servicing contracts, when available or alternatively, is based on a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing income. Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below: Fair Value Measurements At December 31. Using Quoted Prices Significant In Active Other Significant Markets for Observable Unobservable Identical Assets Inputs Inputs (Level 1) (Level2) (Level 3) Securities available for sale Corporate note securities $ $10,781,362 $ Mortgage-backed securities - residential 5,494,561 Collateralized mortgage obligation securities 13,012,782 Municipal securities 1,351,071 Asset back securities 3,486,413 Treasury securities 7,191,876 Mutual funds 3,981, Securities available for sale Corporate note securities $ $ 3,941,401 $ Mortgage-backed securities - residential 9,744,438 Collateralized loan obligation securities 10,924,836 Municipal securities 249,150 30

46 December31, 2011and2010 NOTE 16 - DISCLOSURES ABOUT ESTIMATED FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS The table below presents a reconciliation of collateralized debt obligations measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the years ended December 31: Balance of recurring Level 3 assets at January 1 $ 10,924,836 $ Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized): Included in earnings - realized 1,395,253 Included in other comprehensive income (1,168,328) 1,293,836 Purchases 9,631,000 Sales ( ) Balance of recurring Level 3 assets at December 31 $ $ Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Non-Recurring Basis Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below: Fair Value Measurements At December 31. Using Quoted Prices Significant In Active Other Significant Markets for Observable Unobservable Identical Assets Inputs Inputs (Level 1) (Level2) (Level 3) 2011 Impaired loans Real estate - commercial $ $ $ 23,370,297 Real estate - residential 3,569,232 Commercial and industrial 2,297,387 Consumer and installment Other real estate owned Real estate- commercial 1,081,485 Loans held for sale 6,068,489 Loan servicing rights 5,319, Impaired loans Real estate - commercial $ $ $ 36,680,901 Real estate - residential 2,072,652 Commercial and industrial 3,366,242 Consumer and installment Impaired loans, which are measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral for collateral dependent loans, had a carrying amount of $33,513,229 at December 31, 2011, with a valuation allowance of $4,276,314 at that date. Impaired loans, which are measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral for collateral dependent loans, had a carrying amount of $52,279,952 at December 31, 2010, with a valuation allowance of $10, 160, 157 at that date. 31

47 December 31, 2011 and 2010 NOTE 16 - DISCLOSURES ABOUT ESTIMATED FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS Other real estate owned measured at fair value less costs to sell, had a net carrying amount of $1,081,485, resulting in a write-down of $363,515 for the year ended December 31, At December 31, 2010, the Company's other real estate owned was not carried at fair value. Loan servicing rights, carried at fair value totaled $5,319,926 million, resulting in a charge of $1,630,069 for the year ended December 31, At December 31, 2010, loan servicing rights were not carried at fair value. Loans held for sale, carried at fair value totaled $6,068,489, resulting in a charge of $1,009,652 for the year ended December 31, Carrying amount and estimated fair values of financial instruments at year end were as follows (in thousands): Carrying Estimated Value Fair Value December Financial assets Cash and cash equivalents $ 49,006 $ 49,006 Time deposits with banks Securities available for sale 45,300 45,300 Residential mortgage loans held for sale 7,446 7,446 Commercial loans held for sale 6,068 6,068 Loans receivable, net 387, ,936 FHLB stock 1,437 N/A Mortgage Servicing 5,320 5,320 Accrued interest receivable 2,417 2,417 Financial liabilities Deposits $ 451,826 $ 456,316 Other borrowed funds 22,567 23, 111 Accrued interest payable 2,103 2,103 December Financial assets Cash and cash equivalents $ 31,640 $ 31,640 Time deposits with banks Securities available for sale 24,859 24,859 Residential mortgage loans held for sale 2,630 2,630 Commercial loans held for sale 18,260 18,260 Loans receivable, net 469, ,266 FHLB stock 1,640 NIA Mortgage Servicing 6,950 7,104 Accrued interest receivable 2,975 2,975 Financial liabilities Deposits $ 503,547 $ 507,468 Other borrowed funds 27,567 27,968 Accrued interest payable 2,071 2,071 32

48 December 31, 2011 and 201 O NOTE 16 - DISCLOSURES ABOUT ESTIMATED FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS The methods and assumptions, not previously presented, used to estimate fair value are described as follows: Carrying amount is the estimated fair value for cash and cash equivalents, interest bearing deposits, accrued interest receivable and payable, demand deposits, short-term debt, and variable rate loans or deposits that reprice frequently and fully. For fixed rate loans or deposits and for variable rate loans or deposits with infrequent repricing or repricing limits, fair value is based on discounted cash flows using current market rates applied to the estimated life and credit risk. The fair value of loans, not deemed to be impaired, does not consider any discounts due to market illiquidity. It was not practicable to determine the fair value of FHLB stock due to restrictions placed on its transferability. Fair value of debt is based on current rates for similar financing. The fair value of off-balance-sheet items is not considered material. NOTE 17-CAPITAL PURCHASE PROGRAM On March 13, 2009, as part of the U.S. Treasury Department Troubled Asset Relief Program ("TARP") Capital Purchase Program ("CPP"), the Company issued and sold 17,000 shares of the Company's Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A, having a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, for a purchase price of $17,000,000 in cash. Cumulative dividends on the series A preferred shares will accrue on the liquidation preference at a rate of 5% per annum for the first five years, and at a rate of 9% per annum thereafter. Subject to the approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Preferred Shares are redeemable at the option of the Company at 100 percent of their liquidation preference. In August 2010, the Company exchanged the 17,000 shares of TARP CPP preferred stock (Series A preferred stock) for 17,000 newly issued TARP Community Development Capital Initiative Shares ("CDCI"), shown on the balance sheet as series B preferred stock. The CDC! shares have the same liquidation preference terms as the TARP CPP preferred stock. The CDC! shares bear a dividend rate of 2% per annum for the first eight years from August 15, 2010 to August 15, 2018 and at a rate of 9% thereafter. Subject to the approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and U.S. Treasury Department, the preferred shares are redeemable at the option of the Company at 100 percent of their liquidation preference. The Securities Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which the Preferred Shares were sold, contains limitations on the payment of dividends on the Common Stock which effectively prohibits the payment of cash dividends while the securities are outstanding and on the Company's ability to repurchase its Common Stock, equity securities, or trust preferred securities. The Company is also subject to certain executive compensation limitations included in the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 which places limits on both golden parachute payments and incentive compensation or bonus payments based upon unnecessary or excessive risks. There is also a provision requiring the recovery of bonuses or incentive compensation paid based on reported earnings, gains, or other criteria that are later found to be materially inaccurate. Beginning with the May 2011 dividend payment, the Company must obtain regulatory approval prior to payment. As of December 31, 2011, the Company paid $85,000 in cash dividends on TARP preferred stock and declared but deferred payment on $255,000 in dividends on TARP preferred stock. See Note 15 for additional discussion of regulatory matters. 33