ONLINE APPENDIX (NOT FOR PUBLICATION) Appendix A: Appendix Figures and Tables
|
|
- Edwina Stanley
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ONLINE APPENDIX (NOT FOR PUBLICATION) Appendix A: Appendix Figures and Tables 34
2 Figure A.1: First Page of the Standard Layout 35
3 Figure A.2: Second Page of the Credit Card Statement 36
4 Figure A.3: First Page of the Alternative Layout 37
5 Table A.1: Test of Randomization Balance - Low-risk Clients Prominent Interest Maturity of the Disclosure Rate Featured Plan (1) (2) (3) Credit card limit (0.000) (0.000) (0.000) Credit card balance (0.000) (0.000) (0.000) Probability of using the revolving credit line (0.015) (0.001) (0.069) Average revolved balance (0.034) (0.002) (0.154) Average monthly Interest and fees charges (0.000) (0.000) (0.000) Probability of making a late payment (0.012) (0.001) (0.054) Time with the credit card (years) (0.001) (0.000) (0.006) Revolving interest rate * (0.003) (0.000) (0.014) F(8,13295) p-value Sample size Notes: Each column represents a separate OLS regression where the LHS variable is the corresponding treatment variable. F-test corresponds to a test that the coefficients on all variables are jointly equal to zero. Sample is restricted to low-risk clients. Robust standard errors in parentheses. * significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1% 38
6 Table A.2: Test of Randomization Balance - Medium-risk Clients Prominent Interest Maturity of the Disclosure Rate Featured Plan (1) (2) (3) Credit card limit (0.000) (0.000) (0.000) Credit card balance ** 0.000* (0.000) (0.000) (0.000) Probability of using the revolving credit line (0.028) (0.002) (0.127) Average revolved balance (0.053) (0.003) (0.240) Average monthly Interest *** and fees charges (0.000) (0.000) (0.001) Probability of making a late payment (0.022) (0.001) (0.096) Time with the credit card (years) (0.003) (0.000) (0.015) Revolving interest rate (0.007) (0.000) (0.031) F(8,3198) p-value Sample size Notes: Each column represents a separate OLS regression where the LHS variable is the corresponding treatment variable. F-test corresponds to a test that the coefficients on all variables are jointly equal to zero. Sample is restricted to medium-risk clients. Robust standard errors in parentheses. * significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1% 39
7 Table A.3: Test of Randomization Balance - High-risk Clients Prominent Interest Maturity of the Disclosure Rate Featured Plan (1) (2) (3) Credit card limit (0.000) (0.000) (0.000) Credit card balance (0.000) (0.000) (0.000) Probability of using the revolving credit line (0.030) (0.002) (0.130) Average revolved balance (0.048) (0.003) (0.216) Average monthly Interest and fees charges (0.000) (0.000) (0.001) Probability of making * a late payment (0.021) (0.001) (0.093) Time with the credit card ** (years) (0.003) (0.000) (0.014) Revolving interest rate (0.007) (0.000) (0.033) F(8,3170) p-value Sample size Notes: Each column represents a separate OLS regression where the LHS variable is the corresponding treatment variable. F-test corresponds to a test that the coefficients on all variables are jointly equal to zero. Sample is restricted to high-risk clients. Robust standard errors in parentheses. * significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1% 40
8 Table A.4: Price Sensitivity of Payment Plans Demand Risk categories Full Sample Low-risk Medium-risk High-risk (1) (2) (3) (4) Average take-up (concealed interest rate) (0.002) (0.002) (0.005) (0.006) Panel i: linear probability model Prominent interest rate (0.002) (0.003) (0.007) (0.008) Interest rate *** *** * (0.054) (0.060) (0.154) (0.186) Interest rate x Prominent interest rate ** (0.078) (0.086) (0.226) (0.252) N Panel ii: Logit marginal effects Prominent interest rate (0.002) (0.003) (0.007) (0.008) Interest rate *** *** * (0.054) (0.060) (0.165) (0.177) Interest rate x Prominent interest rate ** (0.079) (0.088) (0.231) (0.251) N Notes: Panel i presents coefficients of a linear probability model of take-up on interest rate, a dummy for emphasized advertisement, and the interaction of these two variables. Panel ii presents logit marginal effects. Column 1 presents estimates for the full sample, while columns 2 to 4 present estimates separately for low-, medium-, and high-risk clients. All estimates are weighted by the inverse of the probability that the client was selected so that they represent the original population. Robust standard errors in parentheses. * significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1% 41
9 Table A.5: Interest Rate Elasticities by Interest Rate Disclosure - Conditional on Revolving Interest Rate Revolving rate = 15.99% Revolving rate < 15.99% All Low-risk Medium-risk High-risk All (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Prominent Rate disclosure? No *** *** *** (0.163) (0.234) (0.319) (0.257) (0.257) Yes *** *** * *** *** (0.166) (0.223) (0.307) (0.253) (0.222) p-value (elasticities are equal) N Notes: Column 1 reports the interest rate elasticities when the interest rate is concealed and when it is prominently disclosed, along with the p-value of a test that these two elasticities are equal, for the sample of clients with revolving interest rate equal to 15.99%. Columns 2 to 4 present the results separately by each risk category restricting the sample to those with revolving interest rate equal to 15.99%. Column 5 presents the results for the sample of clients with revolving interest rate lower than 15.99%. The interest rate elasticities are calculated based on a Linear Probability Model, using equation 2. The interest rate elasticities are calculated based on a Linear Probability Model, using equation 2. All clients in this sample received a payment plan offer, with interest rate equal to 3.99%, 7.99%, or 11.89%. Estimates in columns 1 and 5 are weighted by the inverse of the probability that the client was selected. Robust standard errors in parentheses. * significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1% 42
10 Table A.6: Interest Rate Elasticities by Interest Rate Disclosure - Heterogeneity by Risk Profile Determinants 1 st quartile 2 nd quartile 3 rd quartile 4 th quartile (1) (2) (3) (4) i. Heterogeneity by recurrence in late payments Prominent rate disclosure? No *** *** *** (0.332) (0.282) (0.269) (0.281) Yes *** ** *** *** (0.301) (0.283) (0.271) (0.287) p-value (elasticities are equal) N ii. Heterogeneity by average revolving balance Prominent rate disclosure? No *** *** *** ** (0.545) (0.429) (0.296) (0.188) Yes ** ** *** *** (0.508) (0.462) (0.310) (0.175) p-value (elasticities are equal) N iii. Heterogeneity by average credit usage Prominent rate disclosure? No *** ** *** (0.303) (0.299) (0.289) (0.266) Yes *** ** *** ** (0.300) (0.316) (0.274) (0.254) p-value (elasticities are equal) N Notes: This table reports the interest rate elasticities when the interest rate is concealed and when it is prominently disclosed, along with the p-value of a test that these two elasticities are equal when the sample is divided in quartiles of recurrence in late payments (panel i), average revolving balance (panel ii), and average credit usage (panel iii). These variables are constructed based on information prior to the experiment. The dataset provides information of up to 19 months prior to the experiment. The interest rate elasticities are calculated based on a Linear Probability Model, using equation 2. All clients in this sample received a payment plan offer, with interest rate equal to 3.99%, 7.99%, or 11.89%. All estimates are weighted by the inverse of the probability that the client was selected. Robust standard errors in parentheses. * significant at 10%; ** significant at the 5%; *** significant at 1% 43
11 Table A.7: Test of Randomization Balance - Conditional on Enrollment Prominent Interest Maturity of the Disclosure Rate Featured Plan (1) (2) (3) Credit card limit 0.000* * (0.000) (0.000) (0.000) Credit card balance * (0.000) (0.000) (0.000) Probability of using the revolving credit line (0.080) (0.005) (0.361) Average revolved balance (0.111) (0.007) (0.502) Average monthly Interest and fees charges (0.000) (0.000) (0.001) Probability of making a late payment (0.053) (0.003) (0.232) Time with the credit card (years) (0.006) (0.000) (0.029) Revolving interest rate ** * (0.016) (0.001) (0.071) Medium-risk (0.050) (0.003) (0.221) High-risk (0.052) (0.003) (0.234) F(10,651) p-value Sample size Notes: This table replicates Table 3 for clients who enrolled in a payment plan. * significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1% 44
12 Table A.8: Comparison of Main and Larger Scale Samples Full Sample High-risk clients Main Larger Scale Main Larger Scale Experiment Experiment Experiment Experiment (1) (2) (3) (4) Credit card limit 1, , (17.0) (9.2) (17.9) (7.2) Credit card balance (7.4) (4.1) (12.9) (7.1) Probability of using the revolving credit line (0.003) (0.002) (0.009) (0.003) Average revolved balance (0.002) (0.001) (0.006) (0.002) Average monthly Interest and fees charges (0.5) (0.3) (1.8) (0.9) Probability of making a late payment (0.003) (0.002) (0.008) (0.003) Time with the credit card (years) (0.03) (0.01) (0.06) (0.02) Revolving interest rate (0.01) - (0.02) - Sample size Notes: Column 1 presents averages of the corresponding variable for the main experiment sample, while column 2 presents averages of the corresponding variable for the larger scale experiment described in Appendix B. Sample is restricted to high-risk clients in columns 3 and 4. Robust standard errors in parentheses. 45
13 Table A.9: Test of Randomization Balance - Larger Scale Experiment Offered i = 6.40% Offered i = 9.59% Control group (1) (2) (3) Credit card limit (0.000) (0.000) (0.000) Credit card balance 0.000* (0.000) (0.000) (0.000) Probability of using the revolving credit line (0.007) (0.006) (0.008) Average revolved balance (0.012) (0.011) (0.015) Average monthly Interest and fees charges (0.000) (0.000) (0.000) Probability of making a late payment (0.004) (0.004) (0.005) Time with the credit card *** 0.002*** (years) (0.001) (0.001) (0.001) Medium-risk (0.004) (0.004) (0.005) High-risk (0.005) (0.004) (0.005) F(9,103106) p-value Sample size Notes: This table presents a test of randomization balance for the larger scale experiment presented in Appendix B. Each column represents a separate OLS regression where the LHS variable is the corresponding treatment variable. F-test corresponds to a test that the coefficients on all variables are jointly equal to zero.. * significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1% 46
14 Table A.10: Causal Effects of Enrolling in a Payment Plan on Probability of Default Full Sample Low-risk Medium-risk High-risk Reduced 2SLS Reduced 2SLS Reduced 2SLS Reduced 2SLS Form Form Form Form (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) Offered i=6.39% 0.005* 0.006* (0.003) (0.003) (0.007) (0.007) Offered i=9.59% 0.006** 0.006** * (0.003) (0.003) (0.007) (0.007) Accepted i=6.39% 0.073* 0.110* (0.041) (0.059) (0.077) (0.059) Accepted i=9.59% 0.124** 0.149** * (0.050) (0.073) (0.095) (0.069) Control mean (0.002) (0.003) (0.006) (0.006) Sample size Notes: This table presents the reduced form and 2SLS estimates of the main effect of enrolling in a payment plan on the probability of default in the following 12 months, using the larger scale experiment carried out by the firm. Offered i=6.39% is a dummy variable equal to 1 if client received a payment plan offer with interest rate equal to 6.39%, while Offered i=9.59% is a dummy variable equal to 1 if client received a payment plan offer with interest rate equal to 9.59%. The omitted group received no payment plan offer. All estimates are weighted by the inverse of the probability that the client was selected so that they represent the original population. Robust standard errors in parentheses. * significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1% 47
15 Table A.11: Comparison of Compliers in the Main and in the Larger Scale Experiments Larger scale experiment Main Experiment Clients who enrolled at 11.89% because Sample Clients who enrolled at 9.59% the interest rate information was not prominently disclosed (1) (2) Credit card limit ,135.0 (37.4) (340.0) Credit card balance 1, ,073.5 (41.1) (269.0) Probability of using the revolving credit line (0.007) (0.088) Average revolved balance (0.007) (0.083) Average monthly Interest and fees charges (3.5) (26.2) Probability of making a late payment (0.007) (0.089) Time with the credit card (years) (0.10) (1.66) Revolving interest rate (0.00) (0.41) Notes: Column 1 presents averages of the corresponding variable for clients in the larger scale experiment (described in Appendix B) who were offered and enrolled in a payment plan with interest rate equal to 9.59%. Column 2 presents averages of the corresponding variable for clients in the main experiment who enrolled in a payment plan with interest rate 11.89% because the interest rate information was not prominently disclosed. The average for this group can be calculated by X = X D p ( X H X D ), where p = take-up when prominently disclosed take-up when not prominently disclosed, XD is the average for those who enrolled when information was prominently disclosed, and X H is the average for those who enrolled when information was not prominently disclosed. Robust standard errors in parentheses. 48
16 Appendix B: Effects of Information Disclosure on Subsequent Financial Outcomes for High-Risk Clients The results in section 4.2 reveal that the degree of interest rate disclosure significantly affects high-risk clients decisions. In particular, high-risk clients are 2.8 percentage points less likely to enroll in a payment plan with a high interest rate when the interest rate information is prominently disclosed. But does this affect their future financial position in any meaningful way? While the scale of the experimental design in this paper is not sufficient to estimate how this change in behavior translates into subsequent financial outcomes, such as default probability 1, it is possible to use a larger scale experiment carried out by the same firm with another sample of clients to estimate the causal effect of enrolling in a payment plan. The credit card company designed this larger scale experiment to measure the impact that enrolling in a payment plan has on default rates. The larger scale experiment had two differences in the sample selection relative to the main experiment analyzed in this paper. First, the company selected only clients with the highest revolving interest rate (15.99%) in the larger scale experiment. Second, the main experiment restricted the sample to 4 different credit card due dates, while the larger scale experiment did not have this restriction. Appendix Table A.8 presents averages for baseline variables in the main and in the larger scale experiments. The two samples are similar with respect to observables, especially considering only high-risk clients 2. The credit card company carried out this larger scale experiment in July of 2010 with 103, 116 clients, randomly allocated in three groups. In the first group, 34, 743 clients were offered a menu of payment plans with interest rate equal to 6.39%, in a second group, 49, 573 clients were offered plans with interest rate equal to 9.59%, and finally a control group of 18, 800 clients did not receive any payment plan offer. Clients in the treatment group received a payment plan offer for 3 consecutive months. Appendix Table A.9 presents regressions of each treatment group (offered i = 6.40%, offered i = 9.59%, and no offer) on clients characteristics at baseline. The p-value of a test that all coefficients in these regressions are jointly equal to zero is smaller than 0.1 in one case (p-value=0.087 for the regression using a dummy for control group as LHS variable). Most coefficients in these regressions are not statistically different from zero, with exception of time with the credit card. All results based on this larger scale experiment are not sensitive to including all baseline variables as controls. In order to estimate the impact of enrolling in a payment plan on default rates, I use the following specification: Y i = α + ρ 6.39 E 6.39,i + ρ 9.59 E 9.59,i + ε i (1) where Y i is default in the 12 months after the offer, and E r,i is equal to 1 if client i enrolled in a payment plan with interest rate equal to r. The default variable is equal to 1 if the client does not meet the minimum payment for 3 consecutive months in the 12 months after the payment plan offer 3. The default variable is defined for the credit card account as a whole, and not for the payment plan in particular. 1 In a reduced form regression of information disclosure on default for high-risk clients offered a high interest rate payment plan, the standard error on the information disclosure coefficient is equal to 2.3 percentage points. Although the estimate is not statistically different from zero, it would not be possible to reject that information disclosure has large effects on default, given the large standard errors. 2 Given the differences in sample selection explained above and the large sample size, the differences in baseline variables in the two experiments are statistically significant for most variables. 3 This is how the credit card company defines that a client is on default. When this happens, the company cancels the account, and the client will never be able to apply for this credit card again. 1
17 Coefficient ρ r is the causal effect of enrolling in a payment plan with interest rate r on outcome Y. Note that this causal effect can depend on the interest rate offered. In order to estimate ρ 6.39 and ρ 9.59, offers of payment plans with rates 6.39% and 9.59% are used as instruments for payment plan enrollment at these two rates (the omitted group received no payment plan offer). The 2SLS estimates should, therefore, be interpreted as the local average treatment effect (LATE) of enrolling in a payment plan with interest rate r for those who enroll in such plans, relative to a scenario where they had only the revolving option. Note that this strategy uses payment plan offer (not payment plan interest rate) as instrumental variable for enrollment. Therefore, these estimates are not affected by adverse or advantageous selection. These estimates would capture, however, ex-post incentives on repayment as those would be part of the causal effect of enrolling in a payment plan (Karlan and Zinman (2009)). The results presented in Table A.10 indicate that, on average, enrolling in a payment plan at either of these two interest rates significantly increase the probability of default in the following 12 months. Considering only the high-risk clients, enrolling in a payment plan induces more clients to default when the interest rate is higher (9.59%). Extrapolating these results, enrolling in a payment plan with an even higher interest rate should also increase the probability of default. Since prominent rate disclosure reduces the demand of high-risk clients for payment plans when the interest rate is equal to 11.89%, this information treatment likely reduces the probability of default for clients that change their payment plan enrollment decisions because of the treatment. It is important to point out that reducing the probability of default would not necessarily mean an increase in welfare, as clients might be exercising strategic default. However, a survey with credit card clients in Mexico reported in Seira and Elizondo (2014) shows that over 9/10 said that defaulting would decrease their welfare taking the benefits of defaulting into account. Although these estimates suggest that high-risk clients who did not enroll in a payment plan when offered the full information treatment are less likely to default, another estimate of interest is the reduced form impact of information disclosure on default probability. Assuming that information disclosure only affects subsequent financial outcomes through the enrollment decision, consider the model: 2
18 E r,i = α 1 + β r D r,i + ε 1,i Y i = α 2 + ρ r E r,i + ε 2,i (2) where β r is the causal effect of information disclosure on payment plan enrollment, and ρ r is the causal effect of payment plan enrollment on outcome Y i. Note that these effects can vary with r. Combining these two equations: Y i = α + π r D r,i + ε i, where π r = (β r ρ r ) (3) Therefore, the reduced form effect of prominent rate disclosure would be the product of the effect of prominent rate disclosure on enrollment (β r ) and the effect of enrollment on the outcome variable (ρ r ). This strategy is similar in spirit to Angrist and Krueger (1992) Two-Sample IV. However, instead of using estimates from the reduced form and from the first stage in order to back out the structural parameter, the strategy used here combines the first-stage estimates from my experiment, and the structural parameter estimates from the firm experiment in order to produce an estimate of the reduced form. That is, the overall effect of prominent rate disclosure on default. An implicit assumption in this strategy is that the treatment effect for those who enrolled in a payment plan with interest rate 9.59% is a good approximation to the treatment effect for those who enrolled in a payment plan with interest rate 11.89% because the interest rate information was not prominently disclosed. This hypothesis might be problematic, as evidence from section 4.2 reveals important heterogeneities in treatment effects. While this hypothesis can not be directly tested given the experimental design, it is possible to check whether these two groups are similar in terms of observable variables 4. This comparison, presented in Appendix Table A.11, suggests that these two groups are similar with respect to their observable covariates. Another assumption for this strategy is that information disclosure does not affect the probability 4 I can calculate average characteristics for the sample that enrolls in a payment plan with interest rate 9.59% directly by conditioning on clients who were offered and enrolled in a payment plan with this rate in the larger scale experiment. For those who enrolled in a payment plan with interest rate 11.89% because the interest rate information was not prominently disclosed, it is necessary to assume that all clients who enrolled in a payment plan when the information was prominently disclosed would have also enrolled if the information was in the fine print. In this case, for each observable variable X, the average for this group can be calculated by X = X D p ( X H X take-up when prominently disclosed D ), where p = take-up when not prominently disclosed, XD is the average for those who enrolled when information was prominently disclosed, and X H is the average for those who enrolled when information was not prominently disclosed. 3
19 of default through channels other than enrollment in the payment plan 5. In any case, this exercise would still capture the effects of information disclosure on default that are mediated through changes in payment plan take-up rates. The first experiment provides an estimate for β ( ˆβ = 0.028, s.e ), while the second experiment provides an estimate for ρ 9.59 (ˆρ 9.59 = 0.121, s.e ). Assuming that ρ 9.59 ρ 11.89, combining these two estimates yields the reduced form effect of information disclosure on probability of default for high-risk clients ˆπ = (0.12) ( 0.028) = (s.e ) 6. Note that the standard error is around 10 times smaller than the standard error of the reduced form effects of prominent rate disclosure based on the main experiment (0.25 vs 2.3 percentage points), allowing even modest effects of information disclosure on probability of default to be ruled out. Therefore, prominent rate disclosure has a significant effect in reducing default for clients that are induced to enroll in a payment plan with a high rate because the interest rate information is concealed in the fine print. However, since it affects only a small proportion of consumers, the aggregate effect of such policy would be small even for the population of high-risk clients. 5 This assumption would be violated if, for example, clients realize that the credit card company charges high interest rates when this information is disclosed, and become more prone to default regardless of enrolling in a payment plan. 6 Standard error is calculated using the Delta Method. 4
20 References Angrist, Joshua D. and Alan B. Krueger, The Effect of Age at School Entry on Educational Attainment: An Application of Instrumental Variables with Moments from Two Samples, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1992, 87 (418), Karlan, Dean and Jonathan Zinman, Observing Unobservables: Identifying Information Asymmetries With a Consumer Credit Field Experiment, Econometrica, November 2009, 77 (6), Seira, Enrique and Alan Elizondo, Are Information Disclosure Mandates Effective? Evidence from the Credit Card Market, Social Science Research Network Working Paper Series, May
WORKING PAPERS IN ECONOMICS & ECONOMETRICS. Bounds on the Return to Education in Australia using Ability Bias
WORKING PAPERS IN ECONOMICS & ECONOMETRICS Bounds on the Return to Education in Australia using Ability Bias Martine Mariotti Research School of Economics College of Business and Economics Australian National
More informationDoes Manufacturing Matter for Economic Growth in the Era of Globalization? Online Supplement
Does Manufacturing Matter for Economic Growth in the Era of Globalization? Results from Growth Curve Models of Manufacturing Share of Employment (MSE) To formally test trends in manufacturing share of
More informationWeb Appendix for: Medicare Part D: Are Insurers Gaming the Low Income Subsidy Design? Francesco Decarolis (Boston University)
Web Appendix for: Medicare Part D: Are Insurers Gaming the Low Income Subsidy Design? 1) Data Francesco Decarolis (Boston University) The dataset was assembled from data made publicly available by CMS
More informationOnline Appendix Table 1. Robustness Checks: Impact of Meeting Frequency on Additional Outcomes. Control Mean. Controls Included
Online Appendix Table 1. Robustness Checks: Impact of Meeting Frequency on Additional Outcomes Control Mean No Controls Controls Included (Monthly- Monthly) N Specification Data Source Dependent Variable
More informationHome Energy Reporting Program Evaluation Report. June 8, 2015
Home Energy Reporting Program Evaluation Report (1/1/2014 12/31/2014) Final Presented to Potomac Edison June 8, 2015 Prepared by: Kathleen Ward Dana Max Bill Provencher Brent Barkett Navigant Consulting
More informationApplied Economics. Quasi-experiments: Instrumental Variables and Regresion Discontinuity. Department of Economics Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
Applied Economics Quasi-experiments: Instrumental Variables and Regresion Discontinuity Department of Economics Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Policy evaluation with quasi-experiments In a quasi-experiment
More informationEmpirical Methods for Corporate Finance. Regression Discontinuity Design
Empirical Methods for Corporate Finance Regression Discontinuity Design Basic Idea of RDD Observations (e.g. firms, individuals, ) are treated based on cutoff rules that are known ex ante For instance,
More informationPresented to. Commonwealth Edison Company. December 16, Randy Gunn Managing Director
Energy Efficiency / Demand Response Plan: Plan Year 2 (6/1/2009-5/31/2010) Evaluation Report: OPOWER Pilot Presented to Commonwealth Edison Company December 16, 2010 Presented by Randy Gunn Managing Director
More informationIn Debt and Approaching Retirement: Claim Social Security or Work Longer?
AEA Papers and Proceedings 2018, 108: 401 406 https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20181116 In Debt and Approaching Retirement: Claim Social Security or Work Longer? By Barbara A. Butrica and Nadia S. Karamcheva*
More informationa. Explain why the coefficients change in the observed direction when switching from OLS to Tobit estimation.
1. Using data from IRS Form 5500 filings by U.S. pension plans, I estimated a model of contributions to pension plans as ln(1 + c i ) = α 0 + U i α 1 + PD i α 2 + e i Where the subscript i indicates the
More informationWeb Appendix for: Medicare Part D: Are Insurers Gaming the Low Income Subsidy Design? Francesco Decarolis (Boston University)
Web Appendix for: Medicare Part D: Are Insurers Gaming the Low Income Subsidy Design? 1) Data Francesco Decarolis (Boston University) The dataset was assembled from data made publicly available by CMS
More informationQuant Econ Pset 2: Logit
Quant Econ Pset 2: Logit Hosein Joshaghani Due date: February 20, 2017 The main goal of this problem set is to get used to Logit, both to its mechanics and its economics. In order to fully grasp this useful
More informationAcemoglu, et al (2008) cast doubt on the robustness of the cross-country empirical relationship between income and democracy. They demonstrate that
Acemoglu, et al (2008) cast doubt on the robustness of the cross-country empirical relationship between income and democracy. They demonstrate that the strong positive correlation between income and democracy
More informationOREGON HEALTH INSURANCE EXPERIMENT ANALYSIS PLAN: EVIDENCE FROM VOTING DATA. Introduction
OREGON HEALTH INSURANCE EXPERIMENT ANALYSIS PLAN: EVIDENCE FROM VOTING DATA Introduction In 2008, Oregon held a lottery to allocate a limited number of Medicaid slots to low-income uninsured adults who
More informationTrading and Enforcing Patent Rights. Carlos J. Serrano University of Toronto and NBER
Trading and Enforcing Patent Rights Alberto Galasso University of Toronto Mark Schankerman London School of Economics and CEPR Carlos J. Serrano University of Toronto and NBER OECD-KNOWINNO Workshop @
More informationWeb Appendix Figure 1. Operational Steps of Experiment
Web Appendix Figure 1. Operational Steps of Experiment 57,533 direct mail solicitations with randomly different offer interest rates sent out to former clients. 5,028 clients go to branch and apply for
More informationCensored Quantile Instrumental Variable
1 / 53 Censored Quantile Instrumental Variable NBER June 2009 2 / 53 Price Motivation Identification Pricing & Instrument Data Motivation Medical care costs increasing Latest efforts to control costs focus
More informationReview questions for Multinomial Logit/Probit, Tobit, Heckit, Quantile Regressions
1. I estimated a multinomial logit model of employment behavior using data from the 2006 Current Population Survey. The three possible outcomes for a person are employed (outcome=1), unemployed (outcome=2)
More informationOnline Appendix for. Explaining Corporate Capital Structure: Product Markets, Leases, and Asset Similarity. Joshua D.
Online Appendix for Explaining Corporate Capital Structure: Product Markets, Leases, and Asset Similarity Section 1: Data A. Overview of Capital IQ Joshua D. Rauh Amir Sufi Capital IQ (CIQ) is a Standard
More informationLong Run Price Elasticities of the Demand for Credit: Evidence from a Countrywide Field Experiment in Mexico By: Dean Karlan and Jonathan Zinman
Centre for the Evaluation Centre for the Evaluation of Development Policies of Development Policies at The Institute Institute for Fiscal for Studies Fiscal Studies Long Run Price Elasticities of the Demand
More informationCredit Constraints and Search Frictions in Consumer Credit Markets
in Consumer Credit Markets Bronson Argyle Taylor Nadauld Christopher Palmer BYU BYU Berkeley-Haas CFPB 2016 1 / 20 What we ask in this paper: Introduction 1. Do credit constraints exist in the auto loan
More informationThe Effects of the Premium Subsidies in the U.S. Federal Crop Insurance Program on Crop Acreage
The Effects of the Premium Subsidies in the U.S. Federal Crop Insurance Program on Crop Acreage Jisang Yu Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics University of California, Davis jiyu@primal.ucdavis.edu
More informationRedistribution Effects of Electricity Pricing in Korea
Redistribution Effects of Electricity Pricing in Korea Jung S. You and Soyoung Lim Rice University, Houston, TX, U.S.A. E-mail: jsyou10@gmail.com Revised: January 31, 2013 Abstract Domestic electricity
More informationPeer Effects in Retirement Decisions
Peer Effects in Retirement Decisions Mario Meier 1 & Andrea Weber 2 1 University of Mannheim 2 Vienna University of Economics and Business, CEPR, IZA Meier & Weber (2016) Peers in Retirement 1 / 35 Motivation
More informationLifetime Earnings and Vietnam Era Draft Lottery. Evidence from Social Security Administration Records. Joshua Angrist
Lifetime Earnings and Vietnam Era Draft Lottery. Evidence from Social Security Administration Records Joshua Angrist 1990 Earnings equation: y cti = β c + δ t + s i α + u it y cti : earnings β c : cohort
More informationOnline Appendix to Grouped Coefficients to Reduce Bias in Heterogeneous Dynamic Panel Models with Small T
Online Appendix to Grouped Coefficients to Reduce Bias in Heterogeneous Dynamic Panel Models with Small T Nathan P. Hendricks and Aaron Smith October 2014 A1 Bias Formulas for Large T The heterogeneous
More informationAsymmetric Information and the Impact on Interest Rates. Evidence from Forecast Data
Asymmetric Information and the Impact on Interest Rates Evidence from Forecast Data Asymmetric Information Hypothesis (AIH) Asserts that the federal reserve possesses private information about the current
More informationCredit Demand and Interest Rate Transparency
Credit Demand and Interest Rate Transparency Bruno Ferman Department of Economics, MIT (bferman@mit.edu) Preliminary - please do not quote or cite without permission. Abstract How effectively can consumers
More informationEffects of Tax-Based Saving Incentives on Contribution Behavior: Lessons from the Introduction of the Riester Scheme in Germany
Modern Economy, 2016, 7, 1198-1222 http://www.scirp.org/journal/me ISSN Online: 2152-7261 ISSN Print: 2152-7245 Effects of Tax-Based Saving Incentives on Contribution Behavior: Lessons from the Introduction
More informationUniversity of California Berkeley
University of California Berkeley A Comment on The Cross-Section of Volatility and Expected Returns : The Statistical Significance of FVIX is Driven by a Single Outlier Robert M. Anderson Stephen W. Bianchi
More informationConsumer Credit and Financial Inclusion
Consumer Credit and Financial Inclusion Sara G. Castellanos 1 Diego Jiménez 2 Aprajit Mahajan 3 Enrique Seira 4 1 Banco de México 2 Stanford University 3 University of California, Berkeley 4 Instituto
More informationState Dependence in a Multinominal-State Labor Force Participation of Married Women in Japan 1
State Dependence in a Multinominal-State Labor Force Participation of Married Women in Japan 1 Kazuaki Okamura 2 Nizamul Islam 3 Abstract In this paper we analyze the multiniminal-state labor force participation
More informationGMM for Discrete Choice Models: A Capital Accumulation Application
GMM for Discrete Choice Models: A Capital Accumulation Application Russell Cooper, John Haltiwanger and Jonathan Willis January 2005 Abstract This paper studies capital adjustment costs. Our goal here
More informationCASE STUDY 2: EXPANDING CREDIT ACCESS
CASE STUDY 2: EXPANDING CREDIT ACCESS Why Randomize? This case study is based on Expanding Credit Access: Using Randomized Supply Decisions To Estimate the Impacts, by Dean Karlan (Yale) and Jonathan Zinman
More informationInterest Rate Pass-Through: Mortgage Rates, Household Consumption, and Voluntary Deleveraging. Online Appendix
Interest Rate Pass-Through: Mortgage Rates, Household Consumption, and Voluntary Deleveraging Marco Di Maggio, Amir Kermani, Benjamin J. Keys, Tomasz Piskorski, Rodney Ramcharan, Amit Seru, Vincent Yao
More informationDo Discount Rates Predict Returns? Evidence from Private Commercial Real Estate. Liang Peng
Do Discount Rates Predict Returns? Evidence from Private Commercial Real Estate Liang Peng Smeal College of Business The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA 16802 Phone: (814) 863 1046 Fax:
More informationREVISITING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE HEALTH INSURANCE TAX CREDIT
Dajung Jun Department of Economics Michigan State University, USA E-mail: jundajun@msu.edu REVISITING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE HEALTH INSURANCE TAX CREDIT Original scientific paper UDK: 364.32:336.564.23
More informationFinancial Liberalization and Neighbor Coordination
Financial Liberalization and Neighbor Coordination Arvind Magesan and Jordi Mondria January 31, 2011 Abstract In this paper we study the economic and strategic incentives for a country to financially liberalize
More informationThe Effect of the Internet on Economic Growth: Evidence from Cross-Country Panel Data
Running head: The Effect of the Internet on Economic Growth The Effect of the Internet on Economic Growth: Evidence from Cross-Country Panel Data Changkyu Choi, Myung Hoon Yi Department of Economics, Myongji
More informationHOW EFFECTIVE ARE REWARDS PROGRAMS IN PROMOTING PAYMENT CARD USAGE? EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE
HOW EFFECTIVE ARE REWARDS PROGRAMS IN PROMOTING PAYMENT CARD USAGE? EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE Santiago Carbó-Valverde University of Granada & Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago* José Manuel Liñares Zegarra University
More informationMotivation Literature overview Constructing public capital stocks Stylized facts Empirical model and estimation strategy Estimation results Policy
Efficiency-Adjusted Public Capital and Growth IMF-WB Conference on Fiscal Policy, Equity, and Long-Term Growth in Developing Countries Sanjeev Gupta April 21, 2013 1 Outline of Presentation Motivation
More informationTime Invariant and Time Varying Inefficiency: Airlines Panel Data
Time Invariant and Time Varying Inefficiency: Airlines Panel Data These data are from the pre-deregulation days of the U.S. domestic airline industry. The data are an extension of Caves, Christensen, and
More informationMeasuring Impact. Impact Evaluation Methods for Policymakers. Sebastian Martinez. The World Bank
Impact Evaluation Measuring Impact Impact Evaluation Methods for Policymakers Sebastian Martinez The World Bank Note: slides by Sebastian Martinez. The content of this presentation reflects the views of
More informationPension Wealth and Household Saving in Europe: Evidence from SHARELIFE
Pension Wealth and Household Saving in Europe: Evidence from SHARELIFE Rob Alessie, Viola Angelini and Peter van Santen University of Groningen and Netspar PHF Conference 2012 12 July 2012 Motivation The
More informationLABOR SUPPLY RESPONSES TO TAXES AND TRANSFERS: PART I (BASIC APPROACHES) Henrik Jacobsen Kleven London School of Economics
LABOR SUPPLY RESPONSES TO TAXES AND TRANSFERS: PART I (BASIC APPROACHES) Henrik Jacobsen Kleven London School of Economics Lecture Notes for MSc Public Finance (EC426): Lent 2013 AGENDA Efficiency cost
More informationTHE FINANCIAL WELFARE OF MILITARY VETERANS: DESCRIPTIVE EVIDENCE FROM A NATIONAL SURVEY. William Skimmyhorn. August 8, 2017
THE FINANCIAL WELFARE OF MILITARY VETERANS: DESCRIPTIVE EVIDENCE FROM A NATIONAL SURVEY William Skimmyhorn August 8, 2017 Abstract Using a large national household survey, this analysis provides evidence
More informationSolution to Exercise E5.
Solution to Exercise E5. The Multiple Regression Model. Estimation. Exercise E5.1. Beach umbrella rental Part I. Simple Linear Regression Model. a. Regression model: U t = β 1 + β 2 T t + u t t = 1,...,
More informationStock Liquidity and Default Risk *
Stock Liquidity and Default Risk * Jonathan Brogaard Dan Li Ying Xia Internet Appendix A1. Cox Proportional Hazard Model As a robustness test, we examine actual bankruptcies instead of the risk of default.
More informationCorrecting for Survival Effects in Cross Section Wage Equations Using NBA Data
Correcting for Survival Effects in Cross Section Wage Equations Using NBA Data by Peter A Groothuis Professor Appalachian State University Boone, NC and James Richard Hill Professor Central Michigan University
More informationVoting to Tell Others Online Appendix
Voting to Tell Others Online Appendix Stefano DellaVigna UC Berkeley and NBER John A. List UChicagoandNBER Gautam Rao UC Berkeley This version: January 13, 214 Ulrike Malmendier UC Berkeley and NBER 1
More informationChoice Probabilities. Logit Choice Probabilities Derivation. Choice Probabilities. Basic Econometrics in Transportation.
1/31 Choice Probabilities Basic Econometrics in Transportation Logit Models Amir Samimi Civil Engineering Department Sharif University of Technology Primary Source: Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation
More informationEstimating Market Power in Differentiated Product Markets
Estimating Market Power in Differentiated Product Markets Metin Cakir Purdue University December 6, 2010 Metin Cakir (Purdue) Market Equilibrium Models December 6, 2010 1 / 28 Outline Outline Estimating
More informationCash holdings and CEO risk incentive compensation: Effect of CEO risk aversion. Harry Feng a Ramesh P. Rao b
Cash holdings and CEO risk incentive compensation: Effect of CEO risk aversion Harry Feng a Ramesh P. Rao b a Department of Finance, Spears School of Business, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK
More informationSensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Confounding: Formulation, Implementation, Interpretation
Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Confounding: Formulation, Implementation, Interpretation Joseph W Hogan Department of Biostatistics Brown University School of Public Health CIMPOD, February 2016 Hogan
More informationStudent Loan Nudges: Experimental Evidence on Borrowing and. Educational Attainment. Online Appendix: Not for Publication
Student Loan Nudges: Experimental Evidence on Borrowing and Educational Attainment Online Appendix: Not for Publication June 2018 1 Appendix A: Additional Tables and Figures Figure A.1: Screen Shots From
More informationThe effect of Medicaid on Children s Health: a Regression Discontinuity Approach
The effect of Medicaid on Children s Health: a Regression Discontinuity Approach Dolores de la Mata Job Market Paper This version: December 2010 Abstract In this paper I estimate the impact of Medicaid
More informationEducation Policy Reform and the Return to Schooling from Instrumental Variables *
Education Policy Reform and the Return to Schooling from Instrumental Variables * KEVIN J. DENNY University College Dublin & Institute for Fiscal Studies, London COLM P. HARMON University College Dublin,
More informationAN ANALYSIS OF THE DEGREE OF DIVERSIFICATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE Zheng-Feng Guo, Vanderbilt University Lingyan Cao, University of Maryland
The International Journal of Business and Finance Research Volume 6 Number 2 2012 AN ANALYSIS OF THE DEGREE OF DIVERSIFICATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE Zheng-Feng Guo, Vanderbilt University Lingyan Cao, University
More informationForeign Direct Investment and Economic Growth in Some MENA Countries: Theory and Evidence
Loyola University Chicago Loyola ecommons Topics in Middle Eastern and orth African Economies Quinlan School of Business 1999 Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth in Some MEA Countries: Theory
More informationTechnical Track Title Session V Regression Discontinuity (RD)
Impact Evaluation Technical Track Title Session V Regression Discontinuity (RD) Presenter: XXX Plamen Place, Nikolov Date Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2009 Human Development Human Network Development
More informationExport markets and labor allocation in a low-income country. Brian McCaig and Nina Pavcnik. Online Appendix
Export markets and labor allocation in a low-income country Brian McCaig and Nina Pavcnik Online Appendix Appendix A: Supplemental Tables for Sections III-IV Page 1 of 29 Appendix Table A.1: Growth of
More informationGovernment Consumption Spending Inhibits Economic Growth in the OECD Countries
Government Consumption Spending Inhibits Economic Growth in the OECD Countries Michael Connolly,* University of Miami Cheng Li, University of Miami July 2014 Abstract Robert Mundell is the widely acknowledged
More informationThe Relative Income Hypothesis: A comparison of methods.
The Relative Income Hypothesis: A comparison of methods. Sarah Brown, Daniel Gray and Jennifer Roberts ISSN 1749-8368 SERPS no. 2015006 March 2015 The Relative Income Hypothesis: A comparison of methods.
More informationThe Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on the Export Performance: Empirical Evidence for Western Balkan Countries
Abstract The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on the Export Performance: Empirical Evidence for Western Balkan Countries Nasir Selimi, Kushtrim Reçi, Luljeta Sadiku Recently there are many authors that
More informationLecture 1: Logit. Quantitative Methods for Economic Analysis. Seyed Ali Madani Zadeh and Hosein Joshaghani. Sharif University of Technology
Lecture 1: Logit Quantitative Methods for Economic Analysis Seyed Ali Madani Zadeh and Hosein Joshaghani Sharif University of Technology February 2017 1 / 38 Road map 1. Discrete Choice Models 2. Binary
More informationHow Are SNAP Benefits Spent? Evidence from a Retail Panel
How Are SNAP Benefits Spent? Evidence from a Retail Panel Justine Hastings Jesse M. Shapiro Brown University and NBER March 2018 Online Appendix Contents 1 Quantitative model of price misperception 3 List
More informationAdditional Evidence and Replication Code for Analyzing the Effects of Minimum Wage Increases Enacted During the Great Recession
ESSPRI Working Paper Series Paper #20173 Additional Evidence and Replication Code for Analyzing the Effects of Minimum Wage Increases Enacted During the Great Recession Economic Self-Sufficiency Policy
More informationCross- Country Effects of Inflation on National Savings
Cross- Country Effects of Inflation on National Savings Qun Cheng Xiaoyang Li Instructor: Professor Shatakshee Dhongde December 5, 2014 Abstract Inflation is considered to be one of the most crucial factors
More informationCapital structure and profitability of firms in the corporate sector of Pakistan
Business Review: (2017) 12(1):50-58 Original Paper Capital structure and profitability of firms in the corporate sector of Pakistan Sana Tauseef Heman D. Lohano Abstract We examine the impact of debt ratios
More informationCompetition and the pass-through of unconventional monetary policy: evidence from TLTROs
Competition and the pass-through of unconventional monetary policy: evidence from TLTROs M. Benetton 1 D. Fantino 2 1 London School of Economics and Political Science 2 Bank of Italy Boston Policy Workshop,
More informationFriendship at Work: Can Peer Effects Catalyze Female Entrepreneurship? Erica Field, Seema Jayachandran, Rohini Pande, and Natalia Rigol
Friendship at Work: Can Peer Effects Catalyze Female Entrepreneurship? Erica Field, Seema Jayachandran, Rohini Pande, and Natalia Rigol Online Appendix Appendix Table 1: Heterogeneous Impact of Business
More informationGlobal Retail Lending in the Aftermath of the US Financial Crisis: Distinguishing between Supply and Demand Effects
Global Retail Lending in the Aftermath of the US Financial Crisis: Distinguishing between Supply and Demand Effects Manju Puri (Duke) Jörg Rocholl (ESMT) Sascha Steffen (Mannheim) 3rd Unicredit Group Conference
More informationWeb Appendix For "Consumer Inertia and Firm Pricing in the Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Insurance Exchange" Keith M Marzilli Ericson
Web Appendix For "Consumer Inertia and Firm Pricing in the Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Insurance Exchange" Keith M Marzilli Ericson A.1 Theory Appendix A.1.1 Optimal Pricing for Multiproduct Firms
More informationPublic Employees as Politicians: Evidence from Close Elections
Public Employees as Politicians: Evidence from Close Elections Supporting information (For Online Publication Only) Ari Hyytinen University of Jyväskylä, School of Business and Economics (JSBE) Jaakko
More informationRetirement, Saving, Benefit Claiming and Solvency Under A Partial System of Voluntary Personal Accounts
Retirement, Saving, Benefit Claiming and Solvency Under A Partial System of Voluntary Personal Accounts Alan Gustman Thomas Steinmeier This study was supported by grants from the U.S. Social Security Administration
More informationOnline Appendix to. The Value of Crowdsourced Earnings Forecasts
Online Appendix to The Value of Crowdsourced Earnings Forecasts This online appendix tabulates and discusses the results of robustness checks and supplementary analyses mentioned in the paper. A1. Estimating
More informationLate-Career Job Loss and Retirement Behavior of Couples
Late-Career Job Loss and Retirement Behavior of Couples Ajin Lee November 2015 Abstract This paper argues that wealth uncertainty influences when couples choose to retire. Using data from the Health and
More informationLifetime Income Inequality: quantile treatment effect of retirement on the distribution of lifetime income.
Lifetime Income Inequality: quantile treatment effect of retirement on the distribution of lifetime income. Małgorzata Karolina Kozłowska University of Rome "Tor Vergata" February 6, 26 Małgorzata Karolina
More informationWorking with the ultra-poor: Lessons from BRAC s experience
Working with the ultra-poor: Lessons from BRAC s experience Munshi Sulaiman, BRAC International and LSE in collaboration with Oriana Bandiera (LSE) Robin Burgess (LSE) Imran Rasul (UCL) and Selim Gulesci
More informationDoes Trade Liberalization Increase the Labor Demand Elasticities? Evidence from Pakistan
Does Trade Liberalization Increase the Labor Demand Elasticities? Evidence from Pakistan Naseem Akhter and Amanat Ali Objective of the Study Introduction we examine the impact of the trade liberalization
More informationCapital Gains Realizations of the Rich and Sophisticated
Capital Gains Realizations of the Rich and Sophisticated Alan J. Auerbach University of California, Berkeley and NBER Jonathan M. Siegel University of California, Berkeley and Congressional Budget Office
More informationInternational Journal of Scientific Engineering and Science Volume 2, Issue 9, pp , ISSN (Online):
Relevance Analysis on the Form of Shared Saving Contract between Tulungagung District Government and CV Harsari AMT (Case Study: Construction Project of Rationalization System of Public Street Lighting
More informationInternet Appendix for: Does Going Public Affect Innovation?
Internet Appendix for: Does Going Public Affect Innovation? July 3, 2014 I Variable Definitions Innovation Measures 1. Citations - Number of citations a patent receives in its grant year and the following
More informationSupplemental Table I. WTO impact by industry
Supplemental Table I. WTO impact by industry This table presents the influence of WTO accessions on each three-digit NAICS code based industry for the manufacturing sector. The WTO impact is estimated
More informationCountry Fixed Effects and Unit Roots: A Comment on Poverty and Civil War: Revisiting the Evidence
The University of Adelaide School of Economics Research Paper No. 2011-17 March 2011 Country Fixed Effects and Unit Roots: A Comment on Poverty and Civil War: Revisiting the Evidence Markus Bruckner Country
More informationFDI and economic growth: new evidence on the role of financial markets
MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive FDI and economic growth: new evidence on the role of financial markets W.N.W. Azman-Saini and Siong Hook Law and Abdul Halim Ahmad Universiti Putra Malaysia, Universiti
More informationThe Distributive Impact of Reforms in Credit Enforcement: Evidence from Indian Debt Recovery Tribunals
The Distributive Impact of Reforms in Credit Enforcement: Evidence from Indian Debt Recovery Tribunals Stockholm School of Economics Dilip Mookherjee Boston University Sujata Visaria Boston University
More informationThe Determinants of Capital Structure: Analysis of Non Financial Firms Listed in Karachi Stock Exchange in Pakistan
Analysis of Non Financial Firms Listed in Karachi Stock Exchange in Pakistan Introduction The capital structure of a company is a particular combination of debt, equity and other sources of finance that
More informationEconomics 300 Econometrics Econometric Approaches to Causal Inference: Instrumental Variables
Economics 300 Econometrics Econometric Approaches to Causal Inference: Variables Dennis C. Plott University of Illinois at Chicago Department of Economics www.dennisplott.com Fall 2014 Dennis C. Plott
More informationHow exogenous is exogenous income? A longitudinal study of lottery winners in the UK
How exogenous is exogenous income? A longitudinal study of lottery winners in the UK Dita Eckardt London School of Economics Nattavudh Powdthavee CEP, London School of Economics and MIASER, University
More informationAsian Journal of Economic Modelling MEASUREMENT OF THE COST-OF-LIVING INDEX IN THE EASI MODEL: EVIDENCE FROM THE JAPANESE EXPENDITURE DATA
Asian Journal of Economic Modelling ISSN(e): 2312-3656/ISSN(p): 2313-2884 URL: www.aessweb.com MEASUREMENT OF THE COST-OF-LIVING INDEX IN THE EASI MODEL: EVIDENCE FROM THE JAPANESE EXPENDITURE DATA Manami
More informationUnderstanding the underlying dynamics of the reservation wage for South African youth. Essa Conference 2013
_ 1 _ Poverty trends since the transition Poverty trends since the transition Understanding the underlying dynamics of the reservation wage for South African youth ASMUS ZOCH Essa Conference 2013 KEYWORDS:
More informationOnline Appendix to Bundorf, Levin and Mahoney Pricing and Welfare in Health Plan Choice
Online Appendix to Bundorf, Levin and Mahoney Pricing and Welfare in Health Plan Choice This Appendix compares our demand estimates to the broader literature on health plan choice, and discusses alternative
More informationViolence, Non-violence, and the Effects of International Human Rights Law. Supplemental Information
Violence, Non-violence, and the Effects of International Human Rights Law Supplemental Information Yonatan Lupu Department of Political Science, George Washington University Monroe Hall, Room 417, 2115
More informationPhd Program in Transportation. Transport Demand Modeling. Session 11
Phd Program in Transportation Transport Demand Modeling João de Abreu e Silva Session 11 Binary and Ordered Choice Models Phd in Transportation / Transport Demand Modelling 1/26 Heterocedasticity Homoscedasticity
More informationRisk-Adjusted Futures and Intermeeting Moves
issn 1936-5330 Risk-Adjusted Futures and Intermeeting Moves Brent Bundick Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City First Version: October 2007 This Version: June 2008 RWP 07-08 Abstract Piazzesi and Swanson
More informationMarginal Treatment Effects and the External Validity of the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment
Marginal Treatment Effects and the External Validity of the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment Amanda E. Kowalski Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Yale University Faculty Research Fellow,
More informationBakke & Whited [JF 2012] Threshold Events and Identification: A Study of Cash Shortfalls Discussion by Fabian Brunner & Nicolas Boob
Bakke & Whited [JF 2012] Threshold Events and Identification: A Study of Cash Shortfalls Discussion by Background and Motivation Rauh (2006): Financial constraints and real investment Endogeneity: Investment
More informationOnline Appendix Only Funding forms, market conditions and dynamic effects of government R&D subsidies: evidence from China
Online Appendix Only Funding forms, market conditions and dynamic effects of government R&D subsidies: evidence from China By Di Guo a, Yan Guo b, Kun Jiang c Appendix A: TFP estimation Firm TFP is measured
More informationDepression Babies: Do Macroeconomic Experiences Affect Risk-Taking?
Depression Babies: Do Macroeconomic Experiences Affect Risk-Taking? October 19, 2009 Ulrike Malmendier, UC Berkeley (joint work with Stefan Nagel, Stanford) 1 The Tale of Depression Babies I don t know
More information